FE Commissioner ends involvement with seven providers

Seven FE and skills providers have been told by Skills Minister Nick Boles that their FE Commissioner interventions have come to an end, FE Week can reveal.

Letters confirming the conclusion of Dr David Collins’ involvement with the five colleges and two local authorities were published before Christmas and earlier this month, after being sent to the providers between September and November.

Dr David Collins
Dr David Collins

They were Stoke-on-Trent College, Guildford College, New College Nottingham, Weymouth College, the Marine Society College of the Sea, Norfolk County Council, and Wandsworth Borough Council.

The Skills Minister’s letter to 15,000-learner Stoke-on-Trent College, dated October 26, marked the end of an intervention which began in November 2014, when Dr Collins was called in following concerns by the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) over the college’s finances.

Sarah Robinson, chief executive at the college (pictured above left), said: “The report reflects the FE Commissioner’s confidence that the college is financially able to sustain its improvements and services to the local community in the future.”

A notice of concern from the SFA was also the trigger for a visit to Guildford College by one of Dr Collins’ advisers in August 2014.

His report on the 9,476 learner college, which was rated as ‘requires improvement’ following its last Ofsted inspection in July, highlighted cash flow for its planned capital programme as the “key risk” facing the college.

Mr Boles’ letter to the college, dated September 10, confirmed that the college had addressed the necessary improvements to end the FE Commissioner’s involvement.

Dr Mike Potter, principal of Guildford College Group, said the college had “valued the support of the FE Commissioner and his team in helping the college through a period of great change”.

In his letter to Norfolk County Council, dated October 26, Mr Boles said that he was “heartened” by the action taken by the council to improve its adult education service.

The FE Commissioner’s visit to the 11,500-learner service in April came after it was branded inadequate by Ofsted in March.

Richard Bearman, chair of the Norfolk County Council Adult Education Steering Group, said: “I welcome the recognition that our improvement plan is working.”

Nick Boles
Nick Boles

Mr Boles’ letter to Wandsworth Borough Council, also dated October 26, confirmed that Dr Collins’ intervention at the council’s lifelong learning service, which began in February following an inadequate Ofsted rating in January 2015, had ended.

A spokesperson for the council said: “We’re obviously pleased that with the support of the Commissioner we’ve been able to raise service standards up to the desired level within such a short period of time.”

In a letter dated November 17, the Skills Minister confirmed that Weymouth College was no longer in administered college status.

As previously reported by FE Week, Dr Collins’ involvement at the 4,000 learner college, which improved its Ofsted rating from inadequate to good in December, began in March 2014 following SFA concerns over its financial health.

Nigel Evans, interim principal at Weymouth (pictured above right), said: “We’re happy that we’ve come out of administered status and delighted to be a good college. We want to do the right thing.”

In his letter to New College Nottingham (NCN), dated November 4, Mr Boles confirmed that the FE Commissioner’s intervention at the college had ended in recognition of “progress against the recommendations made as part of the original assessment [by the FE Commissioner’s team] and “on the basis that the college has decided to merge with Central College Nottingham”.

As previously reported by FE Week, Dr Collins was called in to the 20,000-learner college in February following an SFA notice of concern over its finances.

Dawn Whitemore, NCN principal, told FE Week in November that she was delighted the college’s progress had been recognised by Dr Collins.

The Skills Minister’s letter to the Marine Society College of the Sea (MSSC) in October ended a 10-month long intervention at the Lambeth-based provider, as previously reported by FE Week.

Dr Collins visited the provider, which has around 350 learners each year, on December 10, 2014, after it was slapped with an inadequate Ofsted rating in November 2014.

Mark Windsor, MSSC director of lifelong learning, told FE Week in November that he was “delighted” at the end of Dr Collins’ intervention.

Provider comments in full:

Stoke-on-Trent College

Sarah Robinson, chief executive of Stoke-on-Trent College said: “Stoke-on-Trent College is performing well with strong enrolments in all areas. However, there is a legacy of relatively high levels of borrowing to invest in the basic infrastructure of the estate.

“The college commissioned KPMG to review efficiencies prior to the FE Commissioner’s report and, with the support of the FE Commissioner’s team over the last twelve months, we have ensured we have exceeded all targets resulting in a strong operating position for last year.

“The college is engaged in wave two of area reviews and is now modelling opportunities, challenges and risks in respect of future funding models.

“The report reflects the FE Commissioner’s confidence that the college is financially able to sustain its improvements and services to the local community in the future.”

Guildford College

Dr Mike Potter, principal of Guildford College Group, said: “After all our hard work, we are naturally pleased that the FE Commissioner is satisfied that his engagement in the current process with the College is now complete.

“We have, however, certainly valued the support of the FE Commissioner and his team in helping the college through a period of great change.

“These nevertheless remain challenging times for the FE sector and we remain focused on providing quality education and training for our students and local employers.”

Norfolk County Council

Richard Bearman, chair of the Norfolk County Council Adult Education Steering Group, said: “We’re pleased that both the FE Commissioner, and Ofsted in their recent re-inspection monitoring visit, have acknowledged the significant progress made since the initial Ofsted report in March 2015.

“I welcome the recognition that our improvement plan is working and thanks to the hard work of staff we are clearly heading in the right direction. The commitment shown by all the staff and senior managers for adult education has given the cross-party steering group confidence for the future of this service in Norfolk.”

Wandsworth Borough Council

A spokesperson said: “We’re obviously pleased that with the support of the Commissioner we’ve been able to raise service standards up to the desired level within such a short period of time.
“This support was particularly useful in helping the service strengthen its strategic planning and prioritise its resources. The service is now moving forward with a much clearer view of how it can maximise funding for the benefit of local residents.”

Weymouth College

Nigel Evans, interim principal at Weymouth College, said: “Dr Collins and his team have been very helpful to us, in terms of providing clarity, and supporting us by asking us some quite challenging questions and ones that helped guide us. We’re happy in the sense that we’ve come out of administered status and we’re delighted to be a good college. We want to do the right thing.

“He made it very clear to us when we went into administered status what we had to do, and we’ve done it. In that sense, we’re pleased. Clearly, we haven’t suddenly gone from a notice of concern to outstanding, so we have to be on our toes at all times. I think we are in a different place.

“We have to be continually financial vigilant and at the same time put the needs of the students at the centre of what we do, and that’s what we’re trying to do.”

New College Nottingham

Dawn Whitemore, principal at New College Nottingham said: “We’re on track to achieve our planned £1m surplus in 2015/2016.”

Ms Whitemore wrote an expert piece for FE Week in November about NCN’s road to recovery.

The Marine Society College of the Sea

Mark Windsor, MSSC director of lifelong learning, said: “We are delighted the Skills Minister has confirmed that the charity has made sufficient progress and therefore FE Commissioner-led intervention is no longer needed.”

Ofsted boss hits out at ‘inadequate’ FE sector

The FE sector is “inadequate at best” according to Ofsted’s Sir Michael Wilshaw, who has also hit out at colleges’ “uniformly weak” careers advice on offer.

He is due to make the comments in a speech later this afternoon, called ‘Ambitions for English Education’, for the thinktank CentreForum.

“Educational provision, for the many children who do not succeed at 16 or who would prefer an alternative to higher education, is inadequate at best and non-existent at worst,” Sir Michael is expected to say.

Responding to achievement targets for 16-year-olds, set out by CentreForum in its annual report, published Friday (January 15), he is due to say: “But what of the quarter to a third of youngsters who cannot achieve those challenging targets? What is to become of them?

“Even when I was head at Mossbourne Academy in Hackney, which had a great academic reputation, 20 per cent of youngsters failed to reach our targets.

“Most of them went to a local FE college, usually a large, impersonal and amorphous institution, and did badly.”

Sir Michael is also expected to criticise the standard of careers advice on offer at schools and colleges.

“Preparation for employment remains poor and careers guidance in both schools and colleges is uniformly weak,” he is expected to say.

He adds: “No area of the country, however, can really claim to succeed when it comes to provision for those youngsters who do not do well at 16.

“Nor can we say that we are really delivering high-quality vocational education to youngsters of all abilities who would prefer to take this route.

“The statistics show that those who fail to achieve the required grades in maths and English at 16 make little or no progress in FE colleges two years later.

“The 16-19 Study Programme is yet to make an impact on these success rates.”

Sir Michael is also expected to outline his vision for what he called “federations” of schools, which would include university technical colleges “that would admit youngsters across the ability range to focus on apprenticeships at levels 4, 3 and 2”.

“It would not be a dumping ground for the disaffected and cater just for the lower-ability youngsters.”

Expansion plans revealed by new 157 group chief Ian Pretty

The 157 Group is set for expansion following a strategic review, chief executive Ian Pretty has revealed in an exclusive interview with FE Week in which he claimed that up to 15 colleges had already asked about signing up.

The results of the review were explained at an event in London on Thursday (January 14) and Mr Pretty, who took over from executive director Dr Lynne Sedgmore in September, said members told him they wanted the group to grow.

Mr Pretty (pictured above), whose previous roles included senior roles in HMRC, the Cabinet Office and Capgemini, told FE Week: “The members wanted to take the 157 Group in a different direction, which is why they took the conscious decision to hire someone from outside the sector.

“What I said to them was in order to create this new mandate for the 157 Group we need to undertake a strategic review — the members agreed.”

He added: “Our members have agreed that we should look to take on new member colleges. We have 26 members at present and there has been discussion over whether we want to have more or less in future. We decided to look at expanding.

“I am aware that anywhere between 10 and 15 colleges who have expressed an interest in joining us, with the bulk of those contacting us over the last six months.”

The 157 Group is now based at Ealing, Hammersmith and West London College, which according to the representative organisation’s website was still a member, even though it was hit with an inadequate Ofsted rating in December. It indicates a relaxation of previous membership guidelines, as Dr Sedgmore said in March 2014, with an “honourable agreement” existing among members that they would “voluntarily leave” if served with a grade four Ofsted rating.

Mr Pretty said: “A set of new attributes have been agreed to assess any future requests from a college to join. Colleges would typically be large, diverse, technically and professionally focused, employer facing, focused (or aspiring to focus) on level three four and five provision and successful.”

But, he said: “Ofsted grades one and two are regarded as successful, but inadequate is not, but there are other factors to be taken into account. There are a number of indicators of success that could be considered, for example if a college has been given a Beacon Award or impressive success rates.”

Mr Pretty acknowledged the 157 Group “was previously very focused on influencing government policy”. But he said following the review “we want to move toward a heavier focus on policy implementation — so, for example, how we can work with the government to help in area such as the development of Institutes of Technology and technical and professional education pathways including apprenticeships.

“I’m of the view that there is little to be gained from spending an awful lot of time on trying to affect a policy decision,” he said.

Mr Pretty said that over the next five years members aimed to, for example, support devolution, find alternative funding streams to government payments, and identify cost efficiencies which “means effectively collaborative buying” for example with energy suppliers.

Visit the research section on the 157 Group website for more details of its new strategy.


Editor’s comment

Stick to founding principles not floundering principals

The 157 Group was set up in 2006 because of a perceived gap in the market.

Sir Andrew Foster described in paragraph 157 of his review of FE colleges the need for “greater involvement of principals in national representation”.

Specifically, “those from larger, successful colleges where management capacity and capability exists to release them for this work.”

The Association of Colleges represents nearly all colleges, so Foster’s paragraph 157 spawned a new membership organisation, with very particular “large and successful” entry requirements.

Jump forward a decade and the 157 Group has its second boss in chief executive Ian Pretty consulting with members as to where to take the organisation next.

Growing the large and successful college membership is to be encouraged, but at what cost to the group’s reputation if unsuccessful colleges aren’t politely shown the door?

Foster was right that the FE sector needed a 157 Group and I wish Ian and the new team another decade of success.

Chris Henwood

chris.henwood@feweek.co.uk

 

Dear Dr Sue (Edition 160)

On the third Monday of every month Dr Sue Pember, Holex director of policy and external relations, answers your questions, backed by the experience of almost a decade as principal of Canterbury College, in addition to time served in senior civil service posts at central government departments covering education and skills.

 

Is Carver any good?

I have been involved in recent board discussions about alternative models of governance for our college. Please can you tell me the benefits of Policy Governance (Carver Model) and what are its pitfalls? Is this model as hands-off as I have been led to believe?

This model is an entirely different way of thinking about governance and approaching board work, which I think is widely misunderstood. Many seem to have grasped the idea of having one small governing board with no sub-committees but have missed the fact that this concept is actually very hands-on.

small-board-cartoon

If done properly and effectively, the governing body has to spend lots of time in the set-up phase establishing and refocusing policies, systems, delegations and the level and type of accountability and reporting. When it works well, the governing body is very clear about which decisions it will make and which decisions others will make. It can be a much more satisfying experience for both governors and the senior leadership team as it provides clarity of role and responsibility.

The data doesn’t yet show whether boards that have moved to this model are any more effective than those using the more traditional models. In fact, there are instances where colleges developing this model, when they came up against a particularly difficult problem, have found they have not had the expertise and knowledge on the governing body to resolve it and had to resort to quickly setting up a sub-committee to drill down into the institution and ascertain the extent of problem, work out a solution, and make appropriate recommendations to the board.

However, it is likely that these instances have arisen from a rushed set up and these colleges probably did not spend enough time determining the required and rigorous monitoring systems that must be in place to support the board.

 

Why past data?

My college is involved in an area review and from what I have seen I wonder if these reviews are really about the future or just retrofitting the past? The worst possible scenario is that we go through this whole exercise giving up thousands of hours and we just end up with one or two fewer colleges. Do you know why we are spending such a disproportionate amount of time looking at retrospective data which doesn’t even cover school sixth forms?

The rationale for looking at past data is so that the pattern of offer can be established and the travel to education routes detailed. The guidance does say that all data will be reviewed so, even if schools are not formally in the review meetings, their data will be evaluated and considered when determining the needs and requirements of an area.

On creating the space for considering new ways of delivery, I see this to be crucial to the exercise. One of the roles governors can play is to try to make sure that time is put aside to look at future needs. Delivery is changing not just through IT but also through the change of employment patterns. The new agenda will need to evaluate new skills requirements caused by adults working longer and the resulting requirement that we need an infrastructure that can support career change plus adult well-being through education. Also, the new funding systems will change student and employer behaviour, so it is important that all those issues are discussed and analysed.

 

Board review on hold

We’re thinking of refreshing our college board membership and moving to a more streamlined form of governance as we are aware the current make-up doesn’t mirror our community, but we have put the exercise on hold until after the area review. Do you think this was the right decision?

I can understand the logic of putting this exercise on hold but one of the solutions that may stem from your area review is an option for you to merge. If that is the case, it would be very useful to have some early insight into the type of governance appropriate for the new college.

I am aware that several of the mergers being considered at the moment are going to be steered by representation from their existing governing bodies. That approach may offer some reassurance that the interests of each of the colleges are going to be met. However, it could do the reverse and slow down the assimilation into a new institution, with a new ethos and new behaviours.

Having ideas on the new governance structure and how you are going to recruit new members already worked out, together with benefits recorded and risks mitigated, could be a useful and vital addition to ensuring success of the new college. So it might be worth setting up a sub-committee to look at new models and, when the time is right, expand membership to embrace members from the other colleges that may merge with you.

 

Segal stepping down as Association of Employment and Learning Providers boss and moving to new role at training provider

Stewart Segal will be stepping down as chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) at the end of March to move to a newly-created role at a grade one-rated apprenticeship training provider.

Mr Segal will continue in his current role until March 31, an AELP spokesperson said, before starting as the director of strategy, policy and funding at Aspire, Achieve, Advance (3aaa) on a yet-to-be agreed date in April.

Speaking exclusively to FE Week, Mr Segal said: “I’ve been working on policy issues around apprenticeships for many years, and this was just an opportunity, with the apprenticeship policy established now, with the levy, to work more closely with a training provider, more directly, to help put those policies into practice and to get a bit closer to the delivery side.”

Mr Segal said the AELP was “in a strong position” after his three years in charge.

“I think the voice of training providers is now respected and very much part of the development of policy and providers are now seen as part of the solution. And the organisation itself is very strong. Membership is growing.”

Martin Dunford OBE, chairman of AELP, said: “Stewart has done an excellent job in what is an extremely demanding role. We have many members and a multitude of relationships with government, their agencies and many other stakeholders and Stewart has managed this growing network very effectively.

“During his time as chief executive, AELP has achieved a great deal during a period of substantial change.  AELP is in a very strong position with apprenticeships, skills and employability at the centre of the government’s agenda and the voice of training providers is stronger than ever.

Mr Segal has worked with AELP in a number of roles since its formation in 1998.  He was one of the original directors and then worked with AELP as the funding and contracting expert for 10 years before becoming chief executive in 2013.

Peter Marples and Di McEvoy- Robinson, Founders and joint owners of 3aaa said they were “absolutely delighted” to announce Mr Segal’s appointment.

“We have invested heavily in the business over the past five years and these appointments are further commitment of this,” they said.

Mr Segal will continue to work with AELP as a representative member organisation and supporting the work on policy issues such as apprenticeship reform.

“I’m not disappearing, I’ll just be working with AELP in a different role,” Mr Segal told FE Week.

 

 

Sector figures gather for Learning and Work Institute launch

Senior figures from across the FE world gathered for the official launch of the Learning and Work Institute (LWI) at London’s Canary Wharf.

The new organisation was formed through the merger of the National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (Niace) and the Centre for Economic & Social Inclusion (Inclusion).

More than 100 guests, including Jeremy Benson, executive director for vocational qualifications at Ofqual, David Harbourne, acting chief executive of The Edge Foundation, and Carole Stott, chair of the board of the Association of Colleges, attended the launch at JP Morgan, on Wednesday (January 13).

David Hughes, former chief executive of Niace, who has taken up the role of chief executive at LWI, thanked them for showing support, adding he assumed they would agree the organisation’s new website was “sexy”.

David Hughes
David Hughes

He said: “It is great to see so many friends of both Niace and Inclusion.

“I hope you realise how excited we all are about the new organisation. The logo of course is brilliant, the branding is amazing, the new website is really quite sexy, I’m sure you’ll agree.”

“We have a very ambitious vision,” added Mr Hughes. “We don’t think that everyone has equal life chances and can realise their potential in life and are ambitious to change that.”

“We really want to make inroads into poverty and disadvantage. To achieve that, we have to work with all of you [bodies represented by the guests].”

“On the one hand this is a new organisation,” said Mr Hughes. “But we also want to continue the legacy of two really, really important long-standing organisations [Niace and Inclusion].”

Reflecting on what learning and work will mean to LWI, he said: “By ‘learning’, we mean expansive lifelong, all forms, all types and for all sorts of people.”

“We have a very broad sense of what that means and we think ‘work’ needs to be a good experience,” he added.

Other speakers, including Jeremy Moore, director general at the Department for Work and Pensions, and Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA), reflected on how their organisations had worked with Niace and Inclusion in the past and could now help the new organisation achieve its aims.

The other speakers were Hang Ho, head of Europe, Middle East and Africa, JPMorgan Chase Foundation, and Helen Chicot, skills and employment manager, economic affairs at Rochdale Borough Council.

A spokesperson for the LWI, which launched its website on Tuesday (January 12), told FE Week on Tuesday (January 12) that no staff members from either body had been laid off as a result of the merger.

Niace, based in Leicester, and Inclusion, based in London, announced their alliance in February 2015 and said at the time that future merger could not be ruled out.

The full merger and was confirmed at the IntoWork Convention on July 14, 2015.

The new name of the LWI had previously been approved by Niace members on November 4.

[slideshow_deploy id=’43542′]

Top Department for Education civil servant set to move on

The head civil servant at the Department for Education (DfE) Chris Wormald will move to the Department of Health later this year.

Mr Wormald was appointed Permanent Secretary for the DfE in March 2012.

But the government announced today that he will take up the same role at the Department of Health, replacing current boss Dame Una O’Brien, who will stand down at the end of April.

Mr Wormald, who said his new appointment was a “privilege and an honour”, joined the DfE in 2012, having previously worked as director general in the deputy prime minister’s office and as head of the Cabinet Office’s economic and domestic secretariat.

He has also served as director general for local government and regeneration at the Department for Communities and Local Government, and was principal private secretary to former education secretaries Estelle Morris and Charles Clarke.

Mr Wormald appeared before MPs on the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee hearing on October 19 that ‘overseeing financial sustainability in the FE sector’, as reported in FE Week.

He addressed the issue of whether new school sixth forms should be approved while post-16 area reviews are going on.

Hwe told MPs that the reviews would not influence approval decisions “at this moment”.

Education secretary Nicky Morgan and cabinet secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood, who is head of the paid civil service, both paid tribute today to Mr Wormald and his tenure at Sanctuary Buildings, but no details of plans to find his successor have been announced.

Ms Morgan said Mr Wormald had done a “superb job” in leading the DfE, and played a “crucial role” in major reforms.

She said: “Ministers and staff will miss Chris hugely when he moves on, and we wish him all the best in taking up this new challenge.”

Sir Jeremy Heywood echoed Ms Morgan’s praise, and said he would bring a “wealth of leadership, implementation and policy experience” to his new role.

Movers and Shakers: Edition 160

Education technology stalwart Bob Harrison has been appointed to the board of trustees at Central YMCA — which includes awarding organisation, YMCA Awards.

Mr Harrison, a regular FE Week contributor, is hoping to help steer YMCA Awards through the next phase of its “evolution” as it looks to digitise more services.

His career experience has included being chief examiner at vocational education specialists City and Guilds for 12 years, and a member of the Ministerial Educational Technology Action Group.

He was also a member of Feltag and was recently announced as a judge at the prestigious Stanford University Education Technology Expo in the USA.

Mr Harrison said: “I’m thrilled to be joining the board of such an important organisation. I’m particularly attracted to the values and mission of the YMCA and its commitment to the transformational power of education and training. I am also looking forward to supporting the organisation on its journey to a more digital future.”

Rob May, director of YMCA Awards, said: “In 2016 and beyond, YMCA Awards will continue to build on our learning technologies and the way we deliver education. The appointment of Bob can only support our aspirations in this space, and I’m sure that he will help to both challenge and inspire us to create education technology products that learners will love.”

Meanwhile, Andrew Cropley has been announced as the new deputy principal for curriculum at the Warwickshire College Group.

He moves from his position as the executive director for strategic planning and business development at The Sheffield College and chair of the university technical college (UTC) Sheffield governing body and academy trust.

Mr Cropley said he was “thrilled” to join Warwickshire College Group.

“The group has an outstanding reputation for teaching and learning and some amazing facilities that provide a first class experience for thousands of students and apprentices each year across Warwickshire and Worcestershire,” he said.

“I am looking forward to working with the team to ensure that the group is well placed to meet the challenges faced by the FE sector.”

Before joining The Sheffield College Mr Cropley served for 21 years in the Royal Navy in a variety of roles.

These included commanding officer at the Defence School of Languages, staff officer for personnel development at Fleet Headquarters and requirements commander at the Directorate of Naval Training and Education.

He was also chair of Don Valley UTC Academy Trust and Governor Sheffield Inclusion Centre.

And Richmond upon Thames College principal Robin Ghurburun will join the board of trustees at Jisc this month.

At the same time Heather MacDonald, interim principal of Loughborough College, will step down after a three-year tenure on the Jisc board of trustees.

David Maguire, Jisc chair, said: “First of all I would like to thank Heather for her guidance and enthusiasm as a board trustee and Association of Colleges [AoC] representative. During her three years with us we have benefited greatly from her insight.

“Robin will take over from Heather bringing fresh expertise to our board in particular from the FE sector. As well as joining us as a trustee, Robin will also act as the representative for the AoC one of our owners, bringing his expertise as vice chair of the AoC’s technology portfolio group,” he said.

Hopes of merger answer to finances concern

A Cumbria sixth form college rapped over the knuckles for the condition of its finances by the Education Funding Agency (EFA) is hoping a merger will solve its funding problems.

Barrow Sixth Form College was issued with a financial notice to improve this month having been graded as inadequate for financial health in September.

The 900-learner college, rated by Ofsted in May as good, pointed to falling numbers of Year 11 students in local schools — from 959 in 2009 to 747 this year — among the issues it was facing.

It also explained how government funding for 16 and 17-year-olds was 22 per cent lower than 11 to 16-year-olds — and a further 17.5 per cent less for 18-year-olds.

However, it is in talks with Furness College, three miles away, about a possible merger to become “financially strong”.

Mike Phipps, governors’ board chair, said: “Our challenging financial situation is the same as that faced by many colleges across the country as funding to the sixth form sector has been cut, in real terms, year on year since 2010. Funding levels will remain the same for the next five years despite the fact that costs will rise.

“Barrow Sixth Form receives one of the lowest rates of funding per learner of any educational establishment in Cumbria and is not able to reclaim any VAT unlike schools.”

He added: “We are working hard to be proactive to find a solution and are currently in talks with Furness College about a merger.

“A merged college would be financially strong and ensure school leavers have a broad choice of education provision with opportunities to mix academic and vocational training to meet students’ career goals and the needs of our business community.”

The two colleges are expected to feature among wave three area reviews, taking place from April.

But Barrow was told by the EFA to prepare a corporation-approved financial plan by November last year to, according to the notice, “ensure that the college remains in satisfactory financial health through 2015/16 in readiness for the planned structural change at the end of that period”.

An implementation plan, reviewed by Sixth Form College Commissioner Peter Mucklow, is to be handed over by February 19 to the EFA, where a spokesperson said: “We are monitoring Barrow’s progress to ensure students continue to get the best possible education, and the notice will be in place until we are satisfied that effective action has been taken to address our concerns.”

John Butler, governors’ board chair at 3,000-learner Furness College, which was rated as good in April, said the two colleges had already been working together closely and that both boards were “keen” to explore how the relationship could develop to broaden the provision for students ahead of area review.

“This is an excellent opportunity to develop the post-16 curriculum in Furness to ensure that students can choose the best course to enable them to achieve their career aspirations, be that through A-levels, vocational courses or a combination of both,” he said.

“By coming together, the colleges will be in the strongest possible position to serve the needs of young people, adults and employers and to secure the long-term sustainability of education and skills training in the area.”