Consultation launched on plans to merge college with university

Bury College has launched a consultation on its proposed merger with the University of Bolton.

The move was first revealed in an article by FE Week on April 7 — after our analysis found that at least 15 mergers involving 28 FE colleges and three sixth form colleges were planned for August.

A consultation on its proposal to merge with the university has now been launched by Bury College and will run until May 20, with the merger planned to complete by August 12.

Merging with the university was the “most compelling” option available to the college, through the Greater Manchester area review, according to the consultation document.

It said the decision had been based on a number of key considerations — including that it would be able to retain the name Bury College, and develop strong links already in place between the two institutions.

The college would operate as part of the university, but retain its own brand and identity “with substantial ownership and support”, the document added.

This would preserve the college’s identity “while providing a stronger infrastructure to support the delivery of its mission and its long term financial sustainability”.

Consultation_DocumentThe document claimed that being part of the university would “achieve substantial improvements in learners’ overall experience” and “enable provision of a state-of-the-art education environment”.

“It is clear that the university can help Bury College provide a wider and more compelling offer to the businesses of the local area than it can currently do alone, or in partnership with another FE provider, which only offers similar training and the same level,” it added.

“The introduction of significant higher education opportunities into Bury, via the college, is a major and decisive consideration in assessing the best option for Bury and its economic growth.”

The report added the merger “effectively at a stroke creates a university presence” in Bury, which would boost “enterprise, innovation, talent attraction and inward investment”.

Principal Charlie Deane (pictured above) said the proposal would “allow the college to provide a more comprehensive, flexible and responsive curriculum offer, with the potential to improve access and increase choice for a broader range of learners at all levels”.

He added: “It will allow us to build upon the existing strengths and specialisms of both organisations in order to strengthen the educational opportunities for learners, supported by employer demand and the guidance of our stakeholders.”

A spokesperson for the University of Bolton said: “We work closely with Bury College which offers some of our degree courses on its campus.

“The university welcomes the current proposals by the college to consider joining forces with the university, not least to strengthen opportunities for learners to gain even greater access to educational opportunities, including, higher education,” the spokesperson said.

 

Department for Education announces new permanent secretary

The government has today announced who will be taking over from Chris Wormald as the head civil servant at the Department for Education (DfE).

Jonathan Slater (pictured above), currently director general and head of the economic and domestic affairs secretariat at the Cabinet Office, will take up the role of permanent secretary at the DfE on May 3.

The news follows the announcement in January that Mr Wormald, who has been the DfE’s permanent secretary since March 2012, would be moving to the same position at the Department of Health (DoH).

Mr Slater, who described the new appointment as a “tremendous honour”, has been in his role at the Cabinet Office since October last year, where he has been responsible for co-ordinating policy advice to the Prime Minister and the Cabinet.

Earlier roles include director general of head office and commissioning services at the Ministry of Defence, from July 2011.

Mr Slater’s appointment was made by the Prime Minister David Cameron, in agreement with the Cabinet Secretary, Sir Jeremy Heywood, and Education Secretary, Nicky Morgan, following an open competition.

Ms Morgan said she was “delighted” by Mr Slater’s appointment.

“As well as his experience at the Cabinet Office, Jonathan will bring invaluable expertise in leading major delivery programmes at both the Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Defence, as well as his background in local government,” she said.

“He is particularly well-placed to lead the department to deliver the next phase of our reforms to education and children’s social care, and I look forward to working closely with him,” she continued.

Mr Heywood echoed Ms Morgan’s comments, and said that Mr Slater “has a real passion for education and helping all children to fulfil their potential”.

“I know he will do a great job at the Department for Education helping to support and deliver the government’s reform agenda,” he said.

A spokesperson for the DfE was unable to say when Mr Wormald would be moving to the DoH.

Government misses target to recruit volunteer careers advisers

The Government has admitted to missing its target to recruit 300 ‘volunteer enterprise advisers’ by the end of March this year, with 127 places yet to be filled.

In a response to a parliamentary written question about the government’s careers initiatives, it was revealed that the Department for Education (DfE) currently has just 173 (or 60%) of the advisers in place.

The role of the volunteer enterprise advisers is to support young people between 12-18 in schools and colleges with careers advice.

Commenting on the response to his written question, Labour’s Shadow Skills Minister Gordon Marsden said: “Over a year and a half since Ministers first announced their Careers and Enterprise Company, there is very little clarity on what focus or priorities it will have.

“How on earth does the Government expect to try to resurrect a careers programme with such flimsy foundations?

“Young people make career decisions on the basis of their own hands-on experiences as well as from advice by adults. Yet, the DfE continues to fail young people – by not including an obligation for work experience at Key Stage 4 in the curriculum.”

Mr Marsden estimates that with only 173 advisers in place, each currently has responsibility for supporting 18,408 students at secondary school level and 4,600 students in FE and sixth form colleges, making 23,000 young people in total.

When the Government reaches its 300 target, each adviser will support around 13,000 students.

He added that young people “are in danger of being short-changed” over their future career options, with information, advice and guidance or vocational routes in particular remaining “very restricted”.

The Careers and Enterprise Company, first announced by education secretary Nick Morgan in December 2014, was launched in the summer of 2015. Led by chief executive Claudia Harris, the company now has 18 full time equivalent staff members.

Ms Harris commented on the finding, saying: “In what can be a confusing landscape, we use targeted evidence and interventions to make it easier for schools, colleges, employers and careers and enterprise providers to work effectively together to support young people. By working in partnership with other organisations, we are able to significantly amplify our reach.

“We are working with the Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) to build local networks of senior business volunteers to connect to schools and colleges, and we are funding existing providers to scale-up proven careers and enterprise programmes in areas of need.”

She added that in its first year, the company has launched three key interventions which it is “delivering ahead of schedule”.

These include an analysis of areas in England where young people face the greatest need for careers and enterprise provision; the launch of a £5m Careers & Enterprise Fund to invest in organisations in these areas of need; and the launch of the Enterprise Adviser network, which is active in 35 LEPs with over 400 schools.

“The core of our approach is to work in partnership with others, building on what works and testing and learning as we go, to help better inspire and prepare young people across England for work,” she said.

When asked about missing the recruitment target, a Department for Education spokesperson: “Latest figures show the number of young people not in education or training is at the lowest on record and we have the highest ever number of young people going into higher education.

“We have introduced a more rigorous curriculum so every child learns the basic skills they need such as English and maths so they can go on to fulfill their potential whether they are going into the world of work or continuing their studies.

“We are investing £70 million in our careers strategy over the course of this parliament to transform the quality of careers education. We have also set up the Careers & Enterprise Company to bring young people into contact with employers and develop closer links with employers so they can play a greater role in preparing young people for the world of work.”

 

Area review completion delays drag on as new six month target missed

At least three of the seven regions involved in the first wave of post-16 education and training area reviews have already overrun the extended government target for completion, FE Week has found.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) initially advised in September that post-16 education and skills area reviews should take three to four months to complete — then extended this to four to six months in a second guidance document published in March.

At the time of going to press, three areas which held their first steering group meetings in September and early October had now passed the six-month deadline.

A number of principals involved blamed the hold-ups on the unexpected government announcements during this time that sixth form colleges (SFCs) could apply for academy status and that a restructuring facility was to be made available to fund area review recommendations.

Chris Thomson, principal of Brighton, Hove and Sussex Sixth Form College (BHASVIC), which is part of the Sussex area review, told FE Week: “We didn’t know anything at the start about academisation of sixth form colleges, which is a pretty key thing.

“We didn’t know anything at the start about a restructuring fund — again another really key thing. So clearly if you bring things like that on half way through a process it will lengthen it,” he said.

The Sussex area review, which began on October 22, was due to have held its final steering group on February 29, but this has been put back twice and is now scheduled for May 16, Mr Thomson said.

Steve Frampton, principal of Portsmouth College, an SFC in the Solent area, which had its first steering group meeting on November 5, spoke of his frustration at not having all the information needed at the start of the process.

“It is clear the whole process was launched prematurely in my view, and this has resulted in excessive workloads for both sides,” he told FE Week.

Another college principal in the Solent area told FE Week that the final steering group meeting for her area had been delayed from late April to early June.

And FE Week understands that only the Birmingham area review, which began September 18, has held its final steering group meeting.

A total of 50 FE colleges and 33 SFCs are involved in wave one of the area reviews, covering Birmingham, Greater Manchester, Sheffield, Tees Valley, Sussex, the Solent and West Yorkshire.

The announcement over SFC academy status was first made by the Chancellor during the spending review in November, and guidance was published on February 19.

BIS published guidance on the restructuring facility on March 1, two weeks after it had been reported by FE Week.

A BIS spokesperson said guidance on both had to be published after the start of the area reviews, as it had been dependent on the outcomes of the government’s spending review in November.

“It is right that each steering group should take the time needed to make sure that they can gain the benefit of these important initiatives,” she added.

Level three vocational route on rise as A-levels fall

The number of 19-year-olds gaining level three through A-levels has fallen for the first time in seven years, while the figures for those achieving the same standard through vocational routes continues to rise.

The proportion for A-levels fell by 0.3 per cent last year — the first drop since 2008, according to statistics published by the Department for Education (DfE) for level 2 and 3 attainment by age 19 in 2015.

In contrast, the figures for those gaining level three through vocational qualifications by age 19 rose by 0.8 per cent in 2015, to 18.4 per cent.

This represents an increase of over 15 per cent since 2004.

Responding to the results, David Corke, director of education and skills policy for the Association of Colleges, said: “The figures show that young people studying academic and vocational qualifications at level three are maintaining a good level of attainment.

“This demonstrates not only the hard work of the students but the quality of colleges’ teaching.”

The report, ‘Level two and three attainment in England: Attainment by age 19 in 2015’, also found that the number of students successfully gaining level two English and math by age 19 in England reached 70 per cent in 2015, up from 67.8 per cent in 2014.

The proportion of young people who had failed to achieve a level two qualification in English and maths at age 16, but had achieved both by age 19, also rose from 16.9 per cent in 2014 to 22.3 per cent in 2015.

DfE-stats-chart

Mark Dawe, incoming chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, responded to these findings, saying: “The data for vocational qualifications is encouraging, especially in respect of the increases in attainment for English and maths.

“We believe the success in English and maths is thanks to learners being put on appropriate programmes for their learning and in particular functional skills at the core of work based learning provision.

“We will be making this clear to Sir Adrian Smith’s review of the feasibility of compulsory maths until 18, announced in the Budget.”

David Hughes, chief executive at the Learning and Work Institute, said: “It is encouraging to see overall attainment of level two English and maths rising and that achievement gaps are closing.”

But he added: “Far too many young people are still leaving compulsory education without these vital skills.”

The DfE report also showed an improved outlook for students eligible for free school meals (FSM), and those with special educational needs (SEN).

Some 71.9 per cent of students eligible for FSM at 15 had achieved level two by age 19 in 2015, compared to 88.4 per cent of those that were not.

This was a small rise on 2014, when 71.3 per cent of those on FSM at 15 had achieved Level 2 by age 19, compared to 87.9 per cent of those that were not.

For students with SEN at 15, nearly two thirds (65.7 per cent) achieved level two by the age of 19 in 2015 — 0.5 per cent higher than in 2014.

In comparison, 91.9 per cent of those without a SEN at 15 achieved this level, leading to an attainment gap of 26.2 per cent — 0.7 per cent smaller than last year.

A DfE spokesperson told FE Week: “We are clear that vocational and academic qualifications are equally important, but serve different educational purposes.

“We are reforming AS and A levels to be robust and rigorous, to match the best education systems in the world and keep pace with universities’ and employers’ demands. Our reforms also incentivise the take-up of those 16-19 vocational qualifications that are of high value and support progression to further study or a good job.

“It is important that schools and colleges provide students with high quality advice about their qualifications choices, including which qualifications will support their future education and career aspirations.”

Kelvin Hopkins, chair, All-Party Parliamentary Group for Sixth Form Colleges

With his softly-spoken and self-effacing manner, Kelvin Hopkins MP might seem an unlikely candidate for prompting one of the biggest ever upsets in British politics — but appearances can be deceiving.

The leftwing MP for Luton North since 1997 and chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Sixth Form Colleges (SFCs), which has backed calls for SFCs to not be subject to VAT, was first to nominate Jeremy Corbyn for Labour leader last June.

“The nominations opened at 12, and I was in there at five past,” he says.

The day that Corbyn was elected party leader was “the best of my political life, because finally the neoliberal, pro-capitalists had been beaten by the party membership,” says Hopkins, who is a former college teacher and long-time governor at Luton SFC.

While he acknowledges that Corbyn has had a difficult time, Hopkins remains a supporter and says: “Jeremy has been doing extremely well, better and better every week.”

Hopkins was born in 1941 in Leicester to Joan, a medical secretary, and Harold, a renowned physicist who invented fibre optics and the first zoom lens.

Following his parents’ divorce when he was seven, Hopkins was brought up by his father and his second wife, Christine, an artist.

They were, Hopkins says, “a left-wing socialist family”, and he remembers asking his father questions about politics at the age of just nine.

Hopkins grew up in High Barnet, where he attended Foulds County Primary School and later Queen Elizabeth Boys Grammar School.

But despite his father’s insistence, at the age of 14, that he should study science, Hopkins wasn’t destined to follow in his father’s academic footsteps — not least because he discovered a passion for playing music.

“When I was young, I was a jazz musician, so I spent most of my energy playing jazz, and even when I was a student, at times I was playing five nights a week in gigs,” he says.

His face lights up as he describes the height of his jazz career, when — during his time at the University of Nottingham in the 1960s — he played saxophone as part of the interval band for a performance by the Woody Herman Orchestra.

He recalls that they were a great American jazz orchestra and his band played in the big downstairs bar, while members of Woody Herman’s group sat along another wall drinking as we were playing.

I have always lobbied for FE

“At the end of the evening I walked out of the fire escape with my tenor saxophone and felt like one of them,” he says. “I thought, ‘It doesn’t get better than this’.”

It was around this time that Hopkins married his wife Patricia, in 1965.

The two met when Hopkins was “about 17 or 18, very young” when they were both doing the same Christmas job.

He recalls that she proposed as it was a leap year, but admits “it was a bit of a joke, really — I bought the ring and I said, ‘You pretend.’”

The couple have two children, Daniel and Rachel, aged 46 and 43, and two grandchildren, Sophie and Emma, aged eight and seven, whom Hopkins is clearly besotted with.

“They’re wonderful, bright and funny and always make me laugh,” he says.

Hopkins “did eventually do a degree at Nottingham”, graduating with a 2:1 in politics, economics and maths with statistics in 1969.

A career in trade unions was the natural next step for Hopkins, and he worked in research for the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and Nalgo (which later became Unison) from 1969 until 1997.

His work involved writing “a whole series of publications for them, speeches for the general secretary, motions for conferences, speaking for them”, which he describes as “the political side, not the negotiating side. It was fascinating, and I loved it”.

In the middle of his time at the TUC, Hopkins took a couple of years off from the trade union to teach politics, economics and statistics at St Albans College, from 1971 until 1973.

He says: “I saw this job advertised, applied and got the job. And I thought that I’d always wanted to do a bit of teaching, and it was wonderful.”

He recalls his students fell into two groups — those doing A-levels from middle class backgrounds and those doing day release who were alienated and fed up with being forced to go back to college.

“The cultural difference between the two was so great,” he says. “It just reinforced my socialist view that we’ve got to try and break these divisions down, and FE is the place where you can do that.”

He talks passionately of challenging the perceptions of his day release group, who “all assumed I was Conservative because I wore a suit, had a degree and read the Guardian”, via the medium of newspapers.

It took about six or seven weeks before “one lad in the front row” realised he wasn’t a Conservative, Hopkins says.

“I opened their eyes — just because it’s a tabloid and simple language doesn’t necessarily mean it’s Labour, and just because it’s a thick newspaper with lots of words in doesn’t necessarily mean it’s Conservative,” he explains.

Though he only taught at the college for a little over two years, Hopkins’ support for the sector stayed with him.

He’s been a governor at Luton Sixth Form College (LSFC), where Daniel and Rachel studied, since 1993, and before that from 1981 to 1984.

“Both my children in their time were chair of the student council, which are therefore student governors,” he says. “My wife also was a parent governor at different times.”

Hopkins has used his time in parliament to lobby extensively for SFCs and wider FE.

“The first speech I ever made in here was about SFCs, and the way that they are not taken seriously,” he says.

“They were the geese that laid golden eggs. And of course I lobbied for FE in broad terms, general terms, always.”

From 2001 to 2010 he was co-chair of the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) for further education and lifelong learning, and he’s now fighting for SFCs as chair of the all-party parliamentary group.

It was set up in 2010 “because SFCs need defending, I think — they’ve been marginalised by successive governments, but are brilliant institutions”.

One focus for the group has been the campaign for SFCs to not be subject to VAT.

The recent announcement that SFCs can convert to become academies is, Hopkins says, “a way of them [the government] trying to save face” over the VAT issue, which “the government has refused time and time and time again to allow SFCs not to pay”.

Hopkins’ political style is, he says, to “tell the truth as I see it” and to apply “constant, constant pressure on particular issues”.

With reforms to SFCs and FE high on the government agenda, there are sure to be plenty of opportunities for Hopkins to apply that “constant, constant pressure” in the coming months.


IT’S A PERSONAL THING

What’s your favourite book?

Lord of the Flies by William Golding – a politically metaphorical novel about the fragility of democracy and the ever-present threat of fascism.

What do you do to switch off from work?

Listen to music, collect (and occasionally drink!) wine; collect antique glassware; watch sport; cook.

What’s your pet hate?

Cruelty — of any kind.

If you could invite yone to a dinner party, living or dead, who would it be?

JK Galbraith — the great economist and writer.

What did you want to be when you were growing up?

I made model aircraft as a boy and wanted to design aircraft. I actually spent two years in the aircraft industry in early adulthood and much enjoyed it.


CURRICULUM VITAE

Born:

1941: Born in Leicester

1944: Moved to High Barnet

Education & Career:

1946 – 1959: Attended Foulds County Primary School and Queen Elizabeth Boys Grammar School, High Barnet

1965: Married Patricia

1969: Graduated from University of Nottingham

1969 – 1970, 1973 – 1977: Worked in TUC economic department

1971 – 1973: Taught economics, politics and statistics at St Albans College

1977 – 1994: Worked as policy and research officer for Nalgo (now Unison)

1981 – 1984, 1993 – present: governor of Luton Sixth Form College

1997 – present: MP for Luton North

2001 – 2010: co-chair for further education and lifelong learning

2010 – present: Chair of APPG on sixth form colleges


 

Click on the image for a larger version

timeline-kelvin-hopkins

 

 

Left to sink or swim 

Mick Fletcher reflects on the findings of the House of Lords Social Mobility Committee’s report on improving the transition from school to work.

If I have one big criticism of the important new report from the House of Lords Social Mobility Committee it is that the title ‘Overlooked and left behind’ implies neglect of those young people not on the A-level route to higher education.

In fact, what the report documents in impressive detail is better described as abuse.

Provision for this group of young people has not been overlooked — rather it has been subjected to an endless stream of ill-thought out interventions accompanied by a deliberate and systematic reduction in the resources available to support them.

Disadvantaged young people have not so much been left behind as thrown overboard and left to sink or swim.

The findings of the enquiry will not come as a surprise to those working in FE, but they still make shocking reading.

They set out clearly how the FE sector, already less well-resourced than 11-16 schools, has borne the brunt of education cuts.

They remind us of the further cut for those aged 18, cynically justified by the claim that they have already benefitted from the meagre remains of the enrichment budget.

Disadvantaged young people have not so much been left behind as thrown overboard

They point up the contrast between the 15 hours teaching per week, which is all that English FE can afford with three years of 30 hours per week that is the norm in many of our continental counterparts.

The committee is also right to highlight the destruction of independent careers information advice and guidance, the last step in which was the delegation of responsibility to schools without a budget to do it properly and every incentive to offer partial advice.

It is right to highlight the corrosive effect of inter-institutional competition, ramped up and distorted by league tables and high stakes inspection.

Most important of all perhaps, it pinpoints the gaps in government policymaking — not just the damaging division between BIS and DfE, but also the lack of a vision for anything other than universities and apprenticeships.

While the committee is clear about the problems and how they work together to frustrate attempts to improve social mobility, their recommendations lack some of the power of the analysis.

In some respects, they risk allowing policymakers to wander off down the same blind alleys as in the past.

They talk for example of the need to make the system of vocational qualifications more coherent, one noble baroness going so far as to describe current arrangements as gobbledygook.

Yet the report itself notes that the low visibility of many vocational qualifications is in large part due to constant churn driven by previous unsuccessful attempts to standardise and simplify.

The last thing FE needs is a further bout of qualifications ‘reform’.

In a similar way, repeating well-worn clichés about the need to increase the status of vocational education misses the point.

It is not vocational education that has low status, but occupations like care work and plastering and the training that leads to them.

Well intentioned advocacy of the need to raise the status of the vocational will once again be hijacked by engineers to justify more investment in higher technical training — which may be a good thing, but is something else entirely.

The real message of the report perhaps is not headlined in a specific recommendation, but it is there if you look for it.

It is clear from analysis of both English practice and that in more successful jurisdictions that the problem is not that we are doing the wrong things.

Everyone agrees we need to focus on English and maths (though not just GCSE), on building stronger local links between education institutions and employers, providing quality work experience; and providing clear impartial guidance to young people.

We don’t need another ‘reform’ programme or another attempt to push busy employers into a so-called ‘driving seat’.

We just need institutions that are much better resourced and educators who are allowed to get on with it.

Colleges agree ‘hub and spoke’ London proposal could work

The 157 Group’s proposals for a ‘hub and spoke’ approach to provision at level 3 and above in London have been given qualified support by several non-member colleges in the capital, as well as the Association of Colleges (AoC).

On Twitter, Ian Pretty, chief executive at the 157 Group, described the proposals published on Tuesday as a “huge opportunity to ensure that London is rising to the skills demand”.

It called for single colleges to act as hubs for training at level 3 and above in key industries, including housebuilding, creative industries and financial services.

These hubs, or technical institutes, would form a single point of contact for employers in that particular industry, while other colleges across London would act as the spokes, or satellite centres.

“It is good to see that the 157 Group’s manifesto for the London mayoral elections reflects the priorities identified in the AoC London manifesto,” an AoC spokesperson told FE Week.

However, the spokesperson warned against creating additional institutions where provision already existed.

“It is important for colleges to retain their autonomy so they can continue to provide education and training at all levels for anyone who wishes to study there,” the spokesperson added.

The 157 Group’s proposals, ‘Skills for Work, Skills for London’, call for Boris Johnson’s successor as London mayor to have accountability for training at levels 3 to 5.

“London faces its biggest skills challenge at levels 3 and above,” the report said.

“A 32 borough or subregional solution will not work. It needs a London-wide solution led by the mayor,” it added.

Ian Ashman, the principal of Hackney Community College, said that the proposals were an interesting contribution to the debate over “the issue of specialisation, as well as how we better meet the needs of priority sectors”.

“I believe we colleges need to lead the debate about what should be in the core offer in each locality,” Mr Ashman added.

Peter Mayhew-Smith, principal of Carshalton College and Kingston College, said that “a collaborative approach, drawing colleges together around a specialist hub with strong HE and employer links would be vastly preferable to single institutions working alone”.

Sam Parrett, principal of Bromley College and Greenwich Community College said that, while she was “in favour of a hub and spoke model”, she believed “a more market-driven, less prescriptive approach should be considered, to ensure that colleges can adapt to the needs of their local area, rather than having to focus on only one specialism”.

Ms Parratt also warned that, without improved transport links in outer London boroughs, “our students would be unable to benefit as greatly” from the proposals.

A spokesperson for the 157 Group told FE Week: “A main point we are making is that this type of sector institute should be collaborative across many institutions, a hub and spoke model with many colleges and providers across London specialising in aspects of the overarching sector provision.

“This idea does not limit choice for the learner, it enriches provision. As the document specifies, this model works for colleges as it is agile and cost-effective and it is beneficial for learners as it leverages the full capability London providers have to offer.”

A spokesperson for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills declined to comment on the proposals. A spokesperson for the Mayor’s office was unable to comment due to pre-election rules.

It isn’t just about the money

Carolyn Woolley explains her college’s approach to the problem area of recruiting and retaining sufficient numbers of maths and English teachers.

Among the many challenges that FE faces, attracting the very best teaching talent is certainly one of them.

There is huge demand for talented teachers across all educational sectors, with a particularly scarce supply of English and maths teachers.

As a major employer in our borough, we are not only in constant competition with other schools and colleges, but with industry too.

It’s ultimately a race as to who can get the best talent as quickly as possible.

As a result, we are always looking for ways to ensure we find, and ultimately attract, the right people to teach and inspire our diverse student community.

There is no doubt that teaching maths and English at our college and indeed many other colleges around the UK, is a great proposition.

By a college’s nature, students have generally chosen to be there, meaning they are keen to learn, listen and develop.

This in turn leads to success and real rewards for both the teacher and student.

Maths and English skills underpin all vocational disciplines and are simply essential for career success in any industry.

Being part of such a crucial element of a student’s learning journey is not only rewarding, but the reason that so many teachers choose to enter the profession in the first place.

Our innovative approach to teaching and learning appeals to many aspiring and/or trained teachers — the development of our maths and English provision, for example, and our continuous focus on securing successful outcomes for learners of all ages and abilities.

A shortage of teaching talent inevitably pushes costs up for a college, which is an additional challenge at a time of real austerity

A shortage of teaching talent inevitably pushes costs up for a college, which is an additional challenge at a time of real austerity across the sector.

However, in my experience, the best individuals are not incentivised by money alone.

A range of non-financial benefits such as a good work-life balance, a secure employer, continuous CPD and flexible working are all an essential part of the ‘package’.

We constantly review our offer, to ensure it remains both appealing and competitive to prospective candidates.

Crucially, teaching at an FE college offers a unique opportunity to move between age groups and develop the skills needed to teach people of varying abilities and with different goals.

This makes for an excellent developmental opportunity, bringing with it the chance for talented individuals to progress quickly and advance a very successful career.

But of course, financial incentives are important too.

These have to be finely balanced with the ever-growing cutbacks our sector is having to make.

At Bromley, we have implemented a range of incentives to help us attract the right staff from both the FE sector and from industry.

As well as top-scale salaries, we also offer an annual £4k R&R allowance, pension scheme, gym membership and generous annual leave scheme together with many other benefits.

For those FE colleges struggling to recruit, particularly in — but not only – maths and English, it is vital to consider what makes you unique, rather than simply trying to compete on pay alone. The consideration has to be how you can improve your offer, or indeed make it more interesting, than your competitors. Look at it from a personal perspective; where would you like to work and where would you take your talent? Money will only ever be one facet of the decision.

Recruitment challenges can be addressed by providing the right working environment, the right leadership and the right package of both financial and non-financial benefits. We must also pull together as a sector and wax lyrical about the many benefits a career in FE can bring.

We all want to feel like we have made a difference as well as advancing our own careers. There is no better place to do this than in FE — an environment which encourages aspiration and changes many lives for the better.