Apprenticeship frameworks could be discontinued without SFA approval

The UK’s food and drink frameworks could be switched off against the government’s wishes, FE Week has learned.

The Skills Funding Agency is currently deciding on which frameworks it will discontinue from April 2018, but because the new food and drink standards are not yet ready, it hasn’t put them up for consideration.

However, the National Skills Academy for Food and Drink, which still has powers as an issuing authority left over from a previous incarnation, is running its own consultation on whether or not to cancel the frameworks it administers – raising the real possibility that learners might not have access to certain pathways for a year or more.

The NSAFD used to be a sector skills council, and is understood to have the power to switch frameworks off without input from the Department for Education, a reality the DfE has now confirmed.

The news has sparked major concern across the food and drink industry.

In a letter to apprenticeships and skills minister Robert Halfon, seen by FE Week (below), Bill Jermey (pictured), chair of the Food and Drink Training and Education Council (FTC), wrote: “We naturally assumed the government’s own SFA/IfA had the final say on framework withdrawals, but we are astonished to discover the NSAFD still retains the ‘issuing authority’ powers of the defunct SSC to terminate frameworks at their will.”

 

He was particularly worried, he said, that “by closing the framework they stand to gain financially”.

Sector skills councils were granted powers both to issue and withdraw apprenticeship frameworks, as issuing authorities, under the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009.

An email from the SFA has now indicated the limits of the government’s power over such issuing authorities.

“The NSAFD (if they are the listed issuing authority) do have the power to withdraw the food and drink framework outside of the framework withdrawal process,” it said, adding that the NSAFD had “very recently engaged” with the SFA and had “agreed to share the results of the consultation”.

This, however, represents “only a small assurance” because the SFA is only empowered to “make recommendations on their proposals”.

NSAFD’s chief executive Justine Fosh refused to say whether or not her organisation intended to exercise its power as an issuing authority to switch off the frameworks.

The NSAFD’s own consultation document reveals that it is “seeking input to inform recommendations to the DfE”, saying that “in a changing landscape it is down to each issuing authority to inform the approach” for framework switch off.

We do not think this is ready to withdraw yet as this would leave gaps in the market

The document outlines the NSAFD’s decision-making criteria, which it said had been agreed by the Federation of Sector Skills and Standards, and then lists its recommendations for each of the existing food and drink frameworks.

However another email from the SFA has cast doubt on those recommendations.

“Our mapping of standards to the food and drink framework pathways show some low-volume pathways, gaps and some mapping where the standard does not quite cover the chosen pathway,” it said.

“As you can see we do not think this is ready to withdraw yet as this would leave gaps in the market.”

NSAFD owns the only awarding body – Occupational Awards Ltd – that offers mandatory qualifications in the level two and three food and drink process operator standards.

The awarding body is also registered as an end-point assessor for both of these standards.

So far 82 frameworks have been, or are due to be, switched off, and the government is currently consulting on the withdrawal of a further 62 full or part frameworks.

All frameworks are expected to be phased out by 2020.

England’s rugby league team announce new training base at Rochdale college

The England rugby league team has announced its move to a new training base at Hopwood Hall College, where students were invited to watch one of the team’s first training sessions.

Currently ranked third in the international stakes, players from the team will be using the facilities at the Manchester college as their new training ground.

They will use the same facilities as the students on the BTEC and diploma rugby courses, including access to the on-site gym, fitness suites and extra rugby pitches at the college’s Middleton campus. 

The move comes as the team gears up for the start of the rugby league World Cup in October, where they will take on reigning champions Australia in their first game.

Lee Registe, a student taking a BTEC level three in sport and rugby league at the college, said: “It was unbelievable being able to see the England Rugby players up close and personal like that. It was really inspiring seeing them, an unforgettable morning.”

Kyle Amor, who plays as St Helens’ prop forward, said: “Part of our role as players is to inspire the next generation of fans. We’re here first and foremost to train, but encouraging a new fan base or setting an example to the rugby students is really important to all the players.”

 

Main photo: Scrumming it: England players train at the college

Government considers legislation change to protect learners with loans when providers go bust

The government is considering a change in legislation to protect learners left in loans debt after their providers go bust, in a move that would mark an early victory for FE Week’s #SaveOurAdultEducation campaign.

We have been demanding justice for hundreds of learners who have recently been left with thousands of pounds of student loans but no qualification after several training organisations were suddenly wound up with no warning.

After the launch of our campaign at the end of February, the shadow skills minister Gordon Marsden, asked a parliamenatary question (PQ) to education secretary Justine Greening if she would meet with the Skills Funding Agency and the Student Loans Company to discuss the feasibility of writing off student loan debts in such situations.

FE Week now understands that the government is mulling over secondary legislation to protect learner loans when providers go out of business in the future.

We will consider what might be done to avoid these learners being unfairly disadvantaged

“We are committed to finding a solution for each learner and making the process as smooth as possible,” Mr Halfon said in response to the PQ.

“Where there may ultimately be no viable alternative providers available for some learners to complete their study, we will consider what might be done to avoid these learners being unfairly disadvantaged.”

FE Week asked the government to clarify his words, but while the Department for Education did not deny the issue was under consideration, its spokesperson would only refer us back to the minister’s comments.

Asim Shaheen, a former learner left with more than £8,000 in debt after his provider, John Frank Training, went bust in murky circumstances in November, said it was “shocking” that the government didn’t already have a backup plan in place.

He wants a contingency plan introduced “as quickly as possible”, rather than having the SFA “sitting back and waiting for this ricochet to continue”.

“The people who put the loans scheme in place should have thought of different eventualities happening in the first place,” he said.

“Normal people on the street have to think about every eventuality, so for people at such a high level in government, where we’re talking about millions and billions of pounds, surely they should have thought well hang on, these providers we are accrediting, what happens if one of them goes bust?

“They need to put something in place now because the longer they leave it the worse our cases are going to get. It can’t continue like this.”

FE Week first revealed the demise of John Frank Training in January, which left hundreds of learners, who had taken out FE loans to train with the London-based provider, with hefty debts but no course.

The longer they leave it the worse our cases are going to get. It can’t continue like this

It went into liquidation on November 30, leaving no assets, despite recording a profit of £1.3 million in the first half of 2016.

A month later FE Week revealed that another 100 learners were left in the same situation after Hampshire-based Edudo Ltd went bust.

The provider, allocated £500,500 in advanced learner loans by the SFA as of September, went into voluntary liquidation in January, after the company’s “assets and business” were sold to Learning Republic Group Ltd last November.

And this week Focus Training & Development Ltd was found to have left 39 learners on the hook for their loans cash, again with no qualifications to show for it, after it went bust following an ‘inadequate’ Ofsted report in November.

FE Week’s #SaveOurAdultEducation campaign launched in the Houses of Parliament last month and is demanding three things from the government.

The first is to write off unwarranted loan debts, the second is for the government to consult on a proper adult education strategy, and the third is for the introduction of FE maintenance grant loans for adult learners.

Qualifications aren’t created in a day

The government should learn from past mistakes and revise its reform timelines so it doesn’t set the sector up to fail, says Kirstie Donnelly

Asking how long it takes to develop and launch a qualification is like asking the length of a piece of string. It depends, among other factors, on whether it is a new qualification or an adaptation, on required teaching and assessment models, and on its expected duration and level.

A better question might be: how long does it take to develop qualifications that are truly fit for purpose – the purpose being to help learners gain the skills needed for meaningful employment and progression? Or, as in the present landscape, how long will it take to develop a qualification that aims to fundamentally change the way we deliver professional and technical education?

The government’s latest skills timeline answers this question. It allows just under a year from selecting an awarding organisation to finalising the content, then implies teaching will begin four months later. 

We can’t afford another Diploma fiasco

In a Whitehall office these timings might seem ambitious yet achievable but here in the real world, they are nothing short of fantasy.

Creating qualification content is not a case of sitting in a room, writing. When you set out to develop qualifications that meet the needs of employers, employers need to be consulted! Professional and technical education must genuinely reflect the latest technologies and practices in industry, but this only happens through close collaboration with employers in the development phase, which takes time.

The behavioural changes required to introduce new ways of teaching and learning must also be considered. Moving from a model of teaching underpinning theory to one that prepares learners practically for the workplace involves a mindshift that doesn’t happen overnight. Practitioners must be convinced of the value of new approaches and additional training and support are needed to embed new content and changes to assessment models. 

And what about the learners? Young people, and their parents, need time to understand the benefits new types of education can bring. The confidence to step away from traditional routes into employment doesn’t happen overnight.

I can say all this with the experience of someone who has been there recently. Over three years ago, well before the current government existed, we began to develop our City & Guilds TechBac 14-19 programme – at the heart of which sit our technical qualifications, designed to give young people deep industry knowledge through meaningful work experience, alongside the skills and behaviours needed by employers. This decision was about making the right investment and being bold in innovation, without any government intervention. 

Current government thinking doesn’t show any appreciation of real timescales or impact

Three years later, after extensive consultation with employers, engagement with the FE sector and a year of piloting, we are half way through our first year of teaching. Even now we still have a long way to go in terms of educating the sector itself, as well as end users. We always accepted it would be a significant investment (over £3 million), and a long-term one (5+ years). 

Current government thinking doesn’t show any appreciation of real timescales or impact and it’s worrying that they seem not to be learning from past mistakes. The sector still recoils fromdiplomas, remembering the well thought-through reform on which government compromised due to pre-election nerves. Then, the risk was mitigated as we still had a fully functioning qualifications market. If current government plans are allowed through, any last-minute U-turns will leave us without a system to fall back on, which would be catastrophic for the sector and the country. 

Professional and technical education really matters. It has the power to transform lives, businesses and economies and if we are to create the skilled workforce the UK needs for the future, our sector has a huge role to play. 

That is why government has to get this right. My plea to them is to look 10 years ahead: be bold, go further than your predecessors, ask for help from organisations like ours who believe the right change is needed but want it to be done properly. 

We can’t afford another diploma or Train to Gain fiasco; we need a healthy skills system focused on developing high quality professional and technical qualifications that are given time to succeed. I urge the government to learn from past mistakes, genuinely work with the sector and revisit its timelines so it doesn’t yet again set the sector up to fail.

 

Kirstie Donnelly is Managing Director at City & Guilds

Hairdressing team scoop eight medals at regional awards

Students from East Durham College’s hair and beauty department have won eight medals at the Association of Hairdressers and Therapists regional finals.

Twelve colleges from across the north-east of England competed in a range of different disciplines at the event, including hairdressing, barbering, beauty and make-up.

East Durham’s student team picked up three first-place gold medals, three silvers and a bronze, with level two hairdressing student Abbey Johnson receiving the Bobby Mukabaa memorial award. 

The first place wins went to Abbey Johnson for ladies’ evening hair, Laura Burnham for gents’ long hair finish and Natalie Lofthouse in the nail art category.

Craig Harman, Joleen Hope and Tyler Thirwell Johnson took home silvers in the gents commercial, fantasy and face painting, with Charlotte Quinn and Laurie Borgesson taking bronze in the team bridal category.

Angela Johnston, the hairdressing lecturer at the college, said: “Competition is an integral part of the training our students receive, preparing them for the world of work by building their confidence, resilience and self-belief.”

The AHT national finals will be held on the 13th March at Blackpool’s famous Winter Gardens.

 

Main photo: Cream of the crop: Angela, centre, with the team

National Apprenticeship Week is unlike any other week

This week, the skills and apprenticeships minister Robert Halfon travelled the country, meeting apprentices and employers all over the UK. Here, he argues that apprenticeships are going from strength to strength

Why are we celebrating the tenth National Apprenticeship Week? Because we want to showcase the brilliant work employers and their apprentices have been doing.

This week doesn’t just showcase the very best apprentices around our country, but is also incredibly important in raising the prestige of apprenticeships and skills – vital if we are to really build an apprenticeships and skills nation.

NAW 2017 is unlike any other week. We are highlighting the best of the best and shining a light on some of the hardworking, aspirational apprentices and employers around the country. It is good that FE Week does so much to highlight the importance of apprenticeships. Transforming the prestige of apprenticeships must be done by all of us, whether in politics, the media, business and our communities.

What makes this NAW even more special is the wonderful announcements in the budget on technical education. It has really raised the profile of non-academic routes and gives a real chance for millions of young people to climb the ladder of opportunity to get the skills and jobs they need for their future.

Skills truly are at the heart of this budget. The announcements made by the chancellor, Philip Hammond, are the most ambitious post-16 reforms since the introduction of A-levels 70 years ago.

For too long there has been an underinvestment in skills in this country. I really welcome the commitment the chancellor has made to a £500 million investment every year to increase training for 16- to 19-year-olds. This will ensure technical education is on par with our world-leading higher education system and create two genuinely equal options.

Alongside this, the chancellor has confirmed the that maintenance loans will be made available to students on higher technical education courses at levels four to six in national colleges and institutes of technology. This puts technical routes on a real level footing with university. £40 million extra will also be invested in lifelong learning so we can develop pilot schemes to see what works best for learners.

We are working hard to make apprenticeships higher quality by putting employers in the driving seat so people can get their foot on the ladder of opportunity and get the skills they need to fulfil their true potential. Groups of employers have been coming together to create new high-quality apprenticeships. This means there will be the right workforce out there for employer’s needs.

Three million more apprenticeships by 2020 means three million more life-changing opportunities for people of all backgrounds and all ages around the country.

When I attended the National Apprenticeship Awards earlier this year, I was able to meet some extraordinary apprentices from the Get In Go Far campaign, and apprenticeship ambassadors as well. It really was a celebration of the best of the best, and I hope more employers and learners will be inspired by their stories.

We want to showcase the brilliant work employers and their apprentices have been doing.

During this week, I have been travelling round the country alongside the National Apprenticeship Service and meeting some more brilliant apprentices across many diverse fields of employment. From EDF Energy to Crossrail, Sunseeker to Premier Inn, this really has been a fantastic opportunity to hear some inspirational stories.

Along the way I have met some extremely inspirational young women who are working hard to achieve their potential – Josanna at Bridgwater College, who is working hard to become a luthier (someone who crafts string instruments) and at Poole, Ellie, who has risen the ranks at Premier Inn, completing her level three and soon to move on to a level four. Already at the age of just 23, she has become an operations manager.

As part of NAW this year, I have also spoken at a Westminster Hall debate about the importance of trying to make sure everyone who wants to is able to get into an apprenticeship.

Apprenticeships work and that is a fact. The numbers speak for themselves – it is remarkable that 90 per cent of people that do apprenticeships go on to further work or additional education. This really is something to shout about.

We have been making considerable progress towards Britain becoming an apprenticeships and skills nation. Apprenticeship participation in England stands at nearly 900,000 – the highest figure on record.

It is also an important achievement that there have been 780,000 apprenticeships started in England since May 2015.

Apprenticeships really are one of the greatest success stories of the decade.

Through the new apprenticeship levy, £2.5 billion will be invested in apprenticeships by 2019-20, which is double the amount spent in 2010-11. With more money than ever, we will be helping people get into more and better-quality training schemes. Monies raised means that we can help finance small businesses so that they can get the apprenticeships they need to succeed. We also are doing everything possible to invest millions of pounds in ensuring that apprentices from all walks of life, whatever their background or disadvantage, have every possible chance to climb the ladder of opportunity. 

The levy will ensure a step change in apprenticeships numbers and quality giving employers the highly skilled workforce they have been crying out for.

We have come an extremely long way and April is going to be really significant for apprenticeships and our reforms. We will be seeing the apprenticeship levy come into force as well as the launch of the new and independently led Institute for Apprenticeships. The new register of apprenticeship training providers will be in place and trailblazers will continue to work tirelessly to ensure there is a quality apprenticeship out there in every industry.

I hope that NAW 2017 inspires more employers and people to do an apprentice. I congratulate every apprentice, every employer and every provider, whether FE or private for the work they are doing to ensure that millions of people can climb the ladder of opportunity.

More loans misery as provider goes under

Yet another training provider has gone bust, leaving dozens more blameless learners left with plenty of loans debt but no qualifications to show for it.

Focus Training & Development Ltd, a Darlington-based training provider with a £1.5 million allocation from the Skills Funding Agency, went into liquidation on November 29 last year.

It closed soon after it received an ‘inadequate’ rating in an Ofsted report earlier in the month, with administrators called in. 

The SFA terminated its funding after Ofsted’s report came out, which is standard practice when independent training providers are hit with the lowest rating, a grade four.

Of FTD’s £1.5 million SFA contract, £136,500 had been allocated for the delivery of advance learner loans.

The SFA confirmed this week that 39 learners had outstanding loans to pay for training from FTD which they would not now receive.

A spokesperson told FE Week: “We terminated our loans agreement with Focus Training & Development Ltd in November 2016 with immediate effect.

“Our priority is to support the learners affected to complete their learning with minimal disruption, working closely with the Student Loans Company.”

FE Week has recently reported on a spate of provider collapses, leaving hundreds of learners who took out loans to pay for training with heavy debts and no qualifications. Through our new campaign, #SaveOurAdultEducation, we are calling for these debts to be written off.

FTD’s website is not operational, and lists no phone number on which to contact the owners.

FE Week spoke with John Birkinshaw, the lead liquidator working on the case, who passed on our request for comment to FTD’s director Kuldip Brooks, but we received no response from her despite repeated attempts.

The Student Loans Company also declined to comment.

Focus Training & Development Ltd used Aspire Education Consultants UK Ltd, which trades under the name Aspire College, as a subcontractor to deliver its advance learner loans provision, according to Ofsted’s report in November.

The programmes on offer included level three qualifications in business and management, health and social care, travel and tourism, and information and communication technology.

Ofsted’s damning report concluded that learners “make slow progress” and that no-one who had reached their planned completion date had achieved their qualification.

“Although a minority of learners, particularly those who have not participated in learning for a considerable time, improve their confidence initially, they do not achieve the vocational knowledge and employability skills necessary to enable them to advance their career aspirations,” it said.

FE Week approached Aspire, but the provider, based in London, would not comment.

FTD is the third provider to go bust that FE Week has reported on this year.

The first of these was London-based John Frank Training, which folded in January leaving hundreds of learners owing up to £8,000 each.

And last month we revealed that another 100 learners had been left in the same situation after Hampshire-based Edudo Ltd went bust.

The SFA has so far refused to write off the debts of those affected, but FE Week now understands the government is considering secondary legislation that might protect learners from situations like this in the future.

SFA blasted over ‘mystery shopper’ scheme

FE Week readers are up in arms about the Skills Funding Agency’s new mystery shopper scheme to test apprenticeships, because many of them don’t even know when or if they’ll be able to start delivering their own.

The SFA announced its new initiative in its online update on March 8, and said it would use undercover tactics to help identify “any further support the sector may need to be ready to meet employer demand” shortly after sweeping apprenticeship reforms launch in the coming weeks.

Our story on the plan, which went online that day, provoked a very angry reaction from readers, most of whom reckon the SFA would be better off making sure it is itself ready for the reforms.

Their ire was compounded by another story that day – which revealed that the SFA had cancelled a key meeting meant to decide how much money providers would be allocated in non-apprenticeship levy employer funding.

No alternative date has been scheduled, and it should have followed the results of the latest applications to the new Register of Apprenticeship Training Providers, which has also not seen the light of day.

The let-downs were all too much for our readers, with Jon Carr taking offence at the SFA’s claim that its mystery shopper scheme would help it understand what the sector needs.

“Further support? Perhaps telling providers if they have a contract would be a good start,” he said.

Bob Smith, meanwhile, wrote: “It’s a bit rich this isn’t it!?!? I don’t think the SFA are even prepared fully themselves, never mind checking on us. I’m expecting a full on disaster scenario once the reforms kick in. I don’t know any college or training provider that is fully prepared and there will be a fall out.”

Another poster, who identified himself only as Norman, added: “Hilarious and what a cheek.

“The reason many aren’t ready is the lack of clarity and guidance from the SFA, Institute for Apprenticeships and the unceremonious rush to get the new reforms in, despite common sense and experience saying we need more time!”

The reforms will come into force after the apprenticeship levy in April, and employers are being given far more influence over the design and funding of apprenticeship programmes.

Many in the sector have asked whether the SFA is ready for the changes, and fear ministers are rushing them through without proper concern.

FE Week employed its own in-house mystery shopper back in November, to test out the government’s directory of apprenticeship training providers, which had been launched the previous month.

The website, entitled ‘Find Apprenticeship Training’, was described as a one-stop shop for any employer, large or small, which wanted to take on apprentices, and we found it relatively easy to use.

We asked the Department for Education if its own mystery shoppers would be in-house employees or hired from outside, but received no response before going to press.