Headline Ofsted grades scrapped with immediate effect – but only for schools

The move will 'follow' for colleges and ITPs, but the government has not said when

The move will 'follow' for colleges and ITPs, but the government has not said when

2 Sep 2024, 0:01

The government has scrapped single-phrase headline Ofsted grades “with immediate effect” for schools, and said the move will “follow” for other sectors like FE.

It comes ahead of a switch to new report cards next September.

Education secretary Bridget Phillipson said the removal of headline grades was a “generational reform and a landmark moment for children, parents, and teachers”.

“Single headline grades are low information for parents and high stakes for schools. Parents deserve a much clearer, much broader picture of how schools are performing – that’s what our report cards will provide.

“This government will make inspection a more powerful, more transparent tool for driving school improvement. We promised change, and now we are delivering.”

The immediate scrapping of headline grades will apply to state schools only. It will “follow” for private schools, early years settings, colleges, independent training providers, social care and initial teacher training, but the government has not said when.

The DfE told FE Week that removing single headline grades isn’t possible to implement across all sectors all at once because this “takes time and capacity”.

The department could not say whether the policy will be extended to FE and skills providers before report cards are introduced in September 2025.

David Hughes, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said there would have been “a lot of support” from college leaders, parents and students for this to “immediately change for colleges as well”. He added: “I look forward to hearing more from Ofsted about why that has not happened”.

Report cards from 2025

Labour pledged ahead of July’s election to scrap single-phrase Ofsted judgments and replace them with a system of report cards. It followed the death of headteacher Ruth Perry. 

Last November a coroner ruled an Ofsted inspection contributed to her suicide after she was told her school had been rated ‘inadequate’. 

The government today confirmed the new report cards will come into effect from September 2025 following a consultation on their design and content.

Government has promised “extensive consultation with parents, schools and the sector”.

The current sub-judgments of quality of education, behaviour and attitudes, personal development and leadership and management will continue to be used this year. And schools will continue to be graded for each of those areas.

The DfE said Ofsted’s “big listen” consultation, which is set to report back tomorrow, found only three in 10 professionals and four in 10 parents supported single-phrase judgments for overall effectiveness.

Schools that have already been inspected and received a headline grade will retain it until their next inspection.

Intervention to be based on sub-grades

Ministers said Ofsted would continue to identify, and the Department for Education would “continue to intervene where necessary, in cases of the most serious concern”.

The watchdog is under a legal duty to identify schools causing concern – defined as those requiring special measures or requiring significant improvement.

Intervention will be triggered by the sub-judgment grades, often referred-to as limiting judgments because under the previous system if one is rated ‘inadequate’, the school’s overall effectiveness of a school is deemed ‘inadequate’ too.

Intervention would include issuing an academy order, “which may in some cases mean transferring to new management” and by issuing existing academies with termination warning notices.

Perry family ‘delighted and relieved’

Julia Waters

Perry’s sister, Professor Julia Waters, said her family was “delighted and relieved” headline grades had been scrapped for schools.

But she said headline grades were “just the most visible feature of a fundamentally flawed inspection system”. 

“I hope this moment marks the beginning of more extensive reform of Ofsted’s punitive inspection system, and the end of its unaccountable and defensive institutional culture. Too many people in Ofsted have mistaken nastiness for rigour and inhumanity for efficiency.”

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the National Association of Headteachers, added: “There is much work to do now in order to design a fundamentally different long-term approach to inspection and we look forward to working with government to achieve that.”

Pepe Di’Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, added report cards have “the potential to provide parents with a more rounded picture of performance”.

“The big challenge now is to make sure that we get this right and that we don’t end up replacing one flawed system with another flawed system.”

Latest education roles from

Principal & Chief Executive – Bath College

Principal & Chief Executive – Bath College

Dodd Partners

IT Technician

IT Technician

Harris Academy Morden

Teacher of Geography

Teacher of Geography

Harris Academy Orpington

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Exams Assistant

Exams Assistant

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Skills Bootcamps Are Changing – What FE Colleges Must Know 

Skills Bootcamps are evolving as funding moves to local control and digital skills trends shift. Code Institute, an Ofsted...

Code Institute
Sponsored post

Building Strong Leadership for Effective T Level Implementation

Are you struggling with T Level curriculum and implementation, or building strong employer relationships? Do you want to develop...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Derby College Group DIRT and TOES: A Story of Enhanced Learning and Reduced Workload

"Feedback is one of the most powerful influences on learning and achievement" - Hattie and Timperley 2007. This powerful...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Keeping it real – enriching T Level teaching with Industry Insights

T Level teachers across all subjects are getting invaluable support from the Education and Training Foundation’s (ETF) Industry Insights...

Advertorial

More from this theme

Colleges, Ofsted

Shrewsbury College celebrates ‘outstanding’ Ofsted result

Landmark inspection outcome achieved just 5 years after the sixth form group controversially received the lowest possible grade

FE Week Reporter
Ofsted

Ofsted looks at renaming new ‘secure’ grade

But expert warns: 'It’s not that word, it’s the structure of the grading system'

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

‘Inadequate’ blow for newcomer to care home manager training

Franhen Consultancy’s apprenticeship funding contract now hangs in the balance

Anviksha Patel
Ofsted

Joyce’s interim replacement at Ofsted revealed

Senior skills inspector steps into FE deputy director role temporarily

Billy Camden

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments

  1. Andrew Turner

    Only for schools?
    No acknowledgement of the devastating impact of one word judgements on colleges and ITP’s then?
    ITP’s in particular have been dealt an awful hand by one word judgements, with many staff losing their livelihoods.
    There should be a consistent approach to all Ofsted inspections.

    • Agree – this should be system wide not just schools. An inspection has an incredible impact and causes great concern and anxiety amongst other providers too! The thought of it makes people ill.

  2. Phillip Hatton

    We have already had so called report cards in college reports in ALI times that broke down judgements for every stream such as 16-18, adults and apprenticeships. Grading meetings were longer and the process of the team making the card of grades eventually became farcical and ill-judged. Inspectors referred to them privately as ‘bingo cards’. Should we not ever learn from mistakes of the past?