Exclusive: Non-levy allocations no longer ruled out for unsuccessful colleges


Non-levy allocations will no longer be ruled out for the dozens of colleges that weren’t listed on the new register of apprenticeship training providers at the first attempt following political pressure, FE Week has learned.

However, there should be no behind-closed doors special treatment offered to colleges that would work against the private sector, the AELP boss Mark Dawe has warned.

Apprenticeships and skills minister Robert Halfon revealed, during parliamentary education questions, that providers who did not make it onto RoATP would be able to reapply from today – with it subsequently emerging applications need to be in by April 7.

This prompted FE Week to ask DfE if providers who didn’t get on RoATP first time round, had missed their chance to get an SFA allocation for non-levied employers.

The DfE has now indicated a softening of its previous position, with a spokesperson responding today that it’s something the department “will decide on once the new system becomes established”.

It comes as news of the results of up to £440 million of non-levy allocations (funding for apprentices with employers who do not pay the levy) for those that are on RoATP continues to be delayed.

The results of the tendering process should have been published on March 14, according to the Skills Funding Agency’s own timetable. FE Week reported on the delay to the allocations on that date – after it was confirmed on the government’s Bravo e-tendering portal.

The DfE’s director of apprenticeships David Hill then tried to reassure delegates at FE Week’s Annual Apprenticeships Conference in Birmingham, that the delayed results were “imminent” but not “civil-service imminent”.

FE Week understands the Association of Colleges has been lobbying the SFA to find additional non-levy allocation funding – on top of the £440 million – for those colleges that will get on the RoATP at the second time of trying.

Otherwise, the AoC has suggested holding back some of the £440 million for providers successful in the second round as a “contingency”.

David Hughes, AoC chief executive, said: “Ideally SFA would have had time to get the register right and then to confirm tender decisions for small company training.

“However, they had to run the two processes at the same time so AoC has suggested that they process the latest register applications quickly while making sure there is funding available for the highly quality training that the excluded colleges offer.”

His counterpart at AELP, Mr Dawe, insisted that it would be wrong if any special dispensation were given to colleges that missed out on RoATP first time round.

He said: “If there is a private deal done with the colleges that didn’t get on the register first time that is unacceptable. Every provider type needs to be treated fairly. The same approach should be applied to everyone.”

FE Week also asked the DfE what date providers would be able to start apprenticeships from, if they are successful in the RoATP re-application process.

While the DfE spokesperson said he had been unable to pin down a precise date for this, he added “those who are successful in the RoATP process when it reopens, can start in May”.

The questions reflected anxiety among the sector, with Chris Hayden, employer engagement manager for apprenticeship and workforce development in life sciences with South and City College, tweeting: “Great to see applications available again, but, will we have decision before May? Our clients want to know!!”

The new April 7 deadline for the new round of RoATP applications, means the new window is less than three weeks.

This is shorter than that for the first round of applications that opened on October 24 and closed on November 25.

The SFA warned on November 25, just hours before the register deadline, that some providers were failing to follow instructions and were applying via more than one route.

As then reported by FE Week, the Skills Funding Agency published the new RoATP last Tuesday.

Only those providers on the list will be able to deliver apprenticeships from May.

The absence of a number of major providers of apprenticeships, including at least 21 colleges with a combined current allocation of £44 million, caused shock and disbelief across the sector.


Latest education roles from

Marketing Specialist – New Business

Marketing Specialist – New Business

HFL Education

Assistant Head – Curriculum (Vocational Pathway) Post 16 Learners with Special Educational Needs

Assistant Head – Curriculum (Vocational Pathway) Post 16 Learners with Special Educational Needs

Newfriars College

Business Teacher

Business Teacher

Barnsley College

Cover Supervisor

Cover Supervisor

The Stockwood Park Academy

GCSE English Teacher

GCSE English Teacher

Barnsley College

Apprentice Development Leader

Apprentice Development Leader

GP Strategies

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Surely the question is – how is it possible that the 21 colleges, with their huge resources and experience, managed to fail what was a simple process. All they had to do was answer 4 questions with 2000 character answers and tick a few boxes. I think we should question their capability more than anything. After all 73% did get on the register and many of those did not have the huge resources of an FE college to draw upon.

    • Andrew H

      I think the main question is how did the SFA interpret these questions once submitted and decide which had passed and which had failed ? Filling them in wasn’t the issue it was a case of not knowing if they liked the format/layout of your answer. Having now seen several answers I am amazed how some were accepted and others failed – an answer from the SFA on their selection process would be nice !

    • Norman

      Surely the question should be why did inadequate and insolvent organisations get through. Are you really suggesting that a 2000 Character response should determine allocations and a pass for the quality question trumps Ofsted, experience etc.

      The fiasco continues as those high quality organisations who are on now on the RoATP but have no experience have to have mandatory training. Behave yourself as this is fast turning into a nightmare

  2. Nelly B.

    Outrageous. Why do colleges and their FE Week supporters think that they have a divine right to receive Apprenticeship funding? Of that combined £44m pot that these poor old colleges were once allocated, how much did they actually sub-contract out and cream a big juicy management fees from?
    You’ve got colleges in Nottingham sub-contracting millions of pounds to providers in London. Why? Just give the money direct to the sub-contracted providers who are possibly severely inflating the colleges’ overall Apprentice success rates in the first place.

  3. That’s all well and good but it is completely unfair that those who did get on the Register first time still don’t know what, if any, allocation for non-levy employer funding we might get – with only 4 weeks to go until that funding kicks in. How on earth are we expected to effectively “plan” our provision? The Agency should advise all successful RoATP applicants of their allocations now and any residual funding after that allocated to those who failed first time round.