Why it’s easier than ever for employers to take on apprentices

Rupert Crossland digests the apprenticehip rule changes for this year and finds an emerging trend

Rupert Crossland digests the apprenticehip rule changes for this year and finds an emerging trend

30 Sep 2023, 5:00

The Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) and Department for Education (DfE) have released the funding rules changes for 2023-2024. After exploring the changes from the previous year’s rules, a theme emerges: many of the changes make it logistically easier for employers to take on apprentices.

Here are some of the changes that have particular significance for employers.

Flexibility in off-the-job training

Some of the greatest changes in terms of impact for employers are around off-the-job (OTJ) training. Previously, some active learning and OTJ had to take place every 4 weeks; now it must take place every calendar month.

This doesn’t sound like a massive change, but it provides important flexibility for employers who may want their apprentices to be working throughout most of a two-month period. For example, this will benefit those employing retail apprentices over Christmas and January sales.

Making enrolment easier

To help facilitate the sign-up process, the apprentice’s line manager is no longer required to sign the documentation. Any suitable individual at the employing organisation with responsibility to agree to the programme can do so.

In addition, training providers can now accept agreement on a training plan in the form of an email from the employer on the apprentice’s start date and obtain the employer’s signature within 42 days of that. However, using this new prerogative should remain an exception. To maintain a smooth onboarding process, we advise that employers continue to look to provide confirmation and a signature before the start date as a matter of policy.

There is also greater flexibility in the initial assessment process. The employer must, of course,  agree on the recognition of prior learning, how the apprenticeship will be achieved, the price of the apprenticeship and have input in progress reviews. However, if the employer is unable to attend the initial assessment, the provider can give them the opportunity to contribute afterwards and send them the relevant information after the meeting for review and signature.

Simplifying completion

Where an apprentice works less than 30 hours per week, employers must still extend the planned duration of the apprenticeship. However, apprentices can now complete once they have met the one-year minimum duration provided they have met the OTJ requirements.

On the more administrative side of these changes, a statement signed by the apprentice and the employer to agree that OTJ was less than planned only needs to be provided when both the duration is shorter than planned and hours worked are less than planned.

More flexible review timings

Progress reviews must be completed at least four times a year rather than every 12 weeks, and an alternative frequency can be agreed if there is evidence of good a reason. Similar to the initial assessment, employers must be sent details to review and sign after the meeting if they can’t attend the progress review.

A clearer role for ITPs

The changes also take some of the administrative workload from the employer and place the responsibilities with their training provider. Most noticeably, providers are now responsible for choosing the end-point assessment organisation (EPAO) for the employer, which allows them to draw on their experience and existing relationships. That said, the employer may continue to select the EPAO if they wish.

It has also been clarified that the provider is only responsible for checking that the apprentice is being paid a lawful wage by the employer while the apprentice is on programme.

What’s next?

Providers may wish to make employers aware of this greater degree of flexibility as part of their marketing processes. They should mean more businesses are incentivised to start offering apprenticeships or to expand the number they already offer.

These changes represent a leap forward in simplifying apprenticeships for businesses. However, the ESFA must now ensure that there is a robust and clear framework that allows employers to properly appreciate what is expected of them. The best way to do that would be to recognise and build upon the invaluable experience and expertise of training providers and EPAOs.

More from this theme


Revealed: The 8 colleges in DfE’s funding simplification pilot

Government hopes the trial will help decide how to roll out wider changes to funding rules

Josh Mellor
Colleges, Funding

16-19 funding to rise by 1.9% from August 2024

Uplifts won't help teacher recruitment and retention crisis, AoC said

Shane Chowen

Revealed: ‘Front line’ boost to 16-19 funding

Base rate to increase by an extra £111 per student

Anviksha Patel
AEB, Colleges, Funding

ESFA to run special AEB allocations review for colleges

Reduced funding given to providers who underperformed the most during Covid

Billy Camden
Colleges, Cost of living, Funding

MP urges struggling college to hit the brakes on campus closure

'Underutilised' site to shut to save on costs

Billy Camden

ESFA ups childcare cash for young parents as demand falls

Care to Learn allocations rise by £20 per week but data indicates falling demand for subsidies

Jason Noble

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Andrew Kitching

    Seriously Rupert? Enrolling an apprentice remains one of the most over bureaucratic and administratively burdensome processes throughout Further and Higher Education sector. A straw poll of SMEs will testify to that. Whoever thought of introducing the GOV.UK One login definitely wasn’t thinking of employers and simplification. It astonishes me that people in the sector actually think simplification is taking place. Do you honestly think a marketing campaign talking about simplification will really engage employers? I think before any article about simplification is written it should be considered from an employer perspective. Try talking simplification to the care or hairdressing sector and they will laugh before saying I’m too busy. Please add up the number of funding rule pages including the associated documents and then tell me the process has been simplified. It really hasn’t and until there is a considerable overhaul numbers of entry level apprentices will continue to dwindle.

  2. Sync Hole

    Lets just assume this is actually simplification (debatable).

    If it triggers an employer rush towards apprenticeships, then there are three fairly substantial considerations.

    1. The size of the apprenticeship budget (stingy)
    2. Provider capacity (constricted)
    3. All political parties wanting to widen the scope of the levy, leading to fewer apprenticeships. (roadblock)

    You can have different parts of a system all claiming progress, but if they’re progressing in isolation, in different directions…