Student mental health has become one of the defining challenges across both further and higher education. Colleges and universities are seeing more learners who are facing anxiety, depression and stress-related issues than ever before. Yet the ability of institutions to respond has not kept pace, resulting in a wider gap between what students need and what academic institutions can provide.
Rising demand, limited capacity
Research by the Association of Colleges found that 95 per cent of colleges had seen an increase in disclosed mental health difficulties among their 16–18-year-old learners. Similarly in higher education, an Office for National Statistics survey found that around four in ten first-year university students showed symptoms of depression or anxiety.
Waiting lists for counselling and wellbeing services often stretch into weeks, during which time the mental health of these students can worsen.
While both the FE and HE sectors are committed to widening participation, this success brings with it additional complexity. Learners from disadvantaged backgrounds are entering in greater numbers into FE and HE, but they are also more likely to experience mental health challenges (Sutton Trust, 2019). With resources being stretched, often the students who need support the most are struggling to access it.
FE and HE: different contexts, shared challenges
There are some differences between FE and HE. Colleges are catering to a younger audience, many of whom are still trying to navigate through adolescence. They often lack the resilience to deal with major life transitions. Universities, however, are supporting large numbers of international students and mature learners who are balancing multiple pressures.
Despite these differences, the challenge each sector is facing is similar: growing demand with limited resources. Too often, institutions are relying on overstrained counselling services as the first and only line of support, instead of embedding wellbeing across the teaching and learning environment.
The case for early intervention
Evidence has clearly shown that early intervention can make a big difference. In FE, this can mean having regular wellbeing check-ins at enrolment or using pastoral systems to highlight any concerns before they become major problems. In HE, it may involve giving staff adequate training to recognise signs of distress and signpost appropriately.
Having strategies such as flexible deadlines, mentoring schemes and transparent communication around what is expected can decrease stress before it turns into a major crisis. These methods are not resource-intensive, but they require a cultural shift so that responsibility for mental health is seen as shared across the institution, not just left to specialist teams alone to deal with these issues.
Building capacity and partnerships
No institution can solve the mental health crisis on its own. Colleges and universities need to collaborate to build stronger partnerships with local health services, charities and community organisations. Having a joint approach can expand capacity and provide learners with a broader network of support.
At the same time, staff development is imperative. Tutors and lecturers are the very first point of contact, yet many are not prepared to respond to student disclosures. Constant CPD in safeguarding, mental health awareness and referral pathways need to be a part of professional development across both sectors (Universities UK, 2021).
Towards a culture of care
To tackle the mental health gap is not just about offering more counselling sessions, valuable as these are. It is about creating a culture of care that values wellbeing as much as academic success. That means leadership teams must prioritise mental health within strategies, allocate sustainable funding, and ensure accountability for outcomes.
Colleges and universities face immense pressures. But ignoring the mental health of learners is not an option. If FE and HE are truly to prepare students for work, life and active citizenship, then mental health support must be embedded, accessible and prioritised.
The choice is ours invest in early intervention now, or continue to see learners disengage, drop out, or struggle unnecessarily. The mental health gap is not just a student issue; it is a systemic challenge that goes to the heart of education’s purpose.
Your thoughts