Provider shuts its doors to hundreds of young engineering apprentices

Exclusive

A training provider has laid off all 30 staff and shut its door to hundreds of young engineering apprentices, FE Week can reveal.

West Yorkshire-based Kirkdale Industrial Training Services Limited (KITS), an Ofsted grade 2 registered charity that is more than 50 years old, informed their staff and the government of the decision to close on Tuesday.

A total of 278 young apprentices, typically in the engineering and manufacturing sector, have now been left without a training provider.

The decision also impacts 62 learners on study programmes taught by KITS through a subcontract with Calderdale College.

While this publication did not receive comment from the charity’s owners about the situation at the time of going to press, it is understood the main reason for pulling out of delivery was coronavirus related.

KITS website has been taken down and its phone went unanswered.

The Department for Education said their officials are now working with the company to help make sure their apprentices are able to continue their studies with alternative providers.

Calderdale College, which declined to comment, will be responsible for making alternative arrangements for the young people on study programmes so they can complete their learning.

While KITS is understood to be one of the first apprenticeship providers to shut up shop as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did report a healthy financial position in its latest accounts for the year ending March 2019.

They show a £122,259 surplus and state that the charity’s financial position “remains strong” with cash in the bank of £2.2 million.

KITS decision to cease trading came in the same week the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education published their latest board minutes and warned of up to 300 “at risk” providers.

The minutes, for a meeting in March, state: “The chief executive outlined the anticipated impact of Covid-19 on the apprenticeship programme. It was noted that 300 independent training providers/ colleges are estimated to be at risk, and that there were reports of disruption to apprenticeship assessments.

“It was further noted that a poor economic outlook for employers may reduce levy receipts, affecting apprenticeship starts and completion rates.” 

A spokesperson for the quango told FE Week the 300 figure was an “early possible estimate” of what the impact of Covid-19 might be, based on a consensus of other informed stakeholders, such as the Association of Employment and Learning Providers.

Since March, the AELP has been warning government that providers could soon go bust as a result of the pandemic, without extra financial support as apprenticeship starts drop off.

Data published last week by the DfE showed that from March 23 – when lockdown began – to May 31 there were 26,090 starts compared to the 50,050 reported between those months in 2019 – a fall of 47.9 per cent.

While the ESFA has offered providers some form of Covid-19 supplier relief, in which they receive payment in advance of delivery, it excludes the majority of apprenticeships – those offered by levy-paying employers.

Latest education roles from

Biology GCSE Tutor (Variable Hours)

Biology GCSE Tutor (Variable Hours)

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Work Experience Support Assistant

Work Experience Support Assistant

Bournemouth and Poole College

EHCP & SEND Administrator

EHCP & SEND Administrator

Bournemouth and Poole College

Director of Governance

Director of Governance

Stanmore College

Lecturer in Policing and Public Services

Lecturer in Policing and Public Services

West Suffolk College

Personal Progress Tutor

Personal Progress Tutor

West Suffolk College

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 Comments

  1. Darren

    A real shame. A good provider with a good track record. This is inevitable for the sector however. Many more will go over the coming months and the sector needs a radical overhaul. A disingenuous headline by FE Week to state ‘the provider has walked away’- clearly you do not understand that this scenario will not have been by choice in a difficult trading period with a negative immediate future ahead. Good luck to all those affected.

    • Steven

      Sad news indeed Darren. My 16 year old had recently secured a three year apprenticeship with KITS to train as a motor vehicle mechanic… that plan, and, as he sees it, hope for a future, is now dust.

      I know nature, and commerce, abhors a vacuum, and that something will emerge to take the place of KITS, but that isn’t likely to happen in the short term, and certainly not before September. When whatever emerges does take form, the opportunities of training like that offered by KITS will largely not be readily open to this year’s 16 year olds… they’ll possibly be eclipsed by, and competing against, current Yr10 pupils.

      I really feel for the plight of this year’s cohort of 16 and 18 year olds, who have not had the chance to prove themselves fully academically, and will now go through their lives with the qualifications they are awarded under the shadow of suspicion in the eyes of prospective employers and education providers. In many ways, I think we are looking at two age groups that will suffer the hardest from the world we have all been plunged into, who will bear the consequences throughout their adult lives.

      It’s not only students suffering with the closure of KITS though, it’s also their staff who now find themselves unemployed. At every turn the staff there were nothing but helpful, professional, and supportive. they deserved better

  2. Andrew Roberts

    Shame this has happened, but you’ll find the senior management have a nice little nest egg to fall back on.
    And watch what happens to the remaining money.

  3. Jamie Davidson

    A disingenuous headline from a newspaper or even FE. You are shocking and surprised why? It’s how the media can make you and break you in an instance. Just think love island.

  4. Jason Pepper

    So despite the complex and bureaucratic RoATP process – which is supposed to weed out weak/at risk apprenticeship providers – PTPs continue to go under?

    PTP staff, employers and apprentices are left high and dry. And the ESFA are unwilling or unable to cover the often substantial costs involved in transferring learners to other training providers.

    Unless there is proper structural reform the risk is that employers will begin to view the whole apprenticeship system as unfit for purpose: too risky and volatile to be worth the trouble.