Apprenticeship levy should be more flexible for employers

Conservative manifesto pledge: Allow employers to use their levy to pay apprentices’ wages

Neil Carberry argues FOR

The Conservative manifesto pledge to allow firms access to levy funding to cover wage costs for some forms of training came as a surprise – and we certainly shouldn’t read too much into one line, in what was a long and complex manifesto.

But the commitment – and other commitments to levy flexibility in manifestos from many of the parties – represents a change from the debate of the past two years.

READ MORE: Let’s leave the apprenticeship levy alone

Parties seem to have worked out that the challenge in delivering real change in the English skills system is not primarily about where the money comes from. Instead, it’s about the incentives at work in the system and how we encourage the growth of high quality provision.

Delivering great training should always be the best option for levy payers – and without changes to the system as set out in 2015, that wasn’t going to happen.

This is a trend that we should welcome. For too long, English skills policy has been stuck on a two-year cycle of new policy and too little time for delivery. The new approach to standards, coupled with levy funding, has the potential to change that.

As I set out a couple of weeks ago in FE Week, stability in this system is essential to long-term investment by employers, confidence amongst providers and belief in the value of technical and professional routes amongst potential learners.

Delivering great training should always be the best option

We know that there are big challenges to face, so the approach should evolve over time. Manifestos can reflect that, as they look to 2022. Among the key issues are effective quality control and learner protections. Likewise, the standards approval process needs to quicken and become more interlinked. These are big jobs for the new Institute for Apprenticeships.

But there is more to evolving the system for success than this. At present, there is still a strong sense amongst many businesses that the long-promised focus on genuine skills needs has not followed the imposition of a significant new payroll tax in the way that they had hoped. Globally, training levies are generally designed to be reclaimable in full by employers who do the right thing. Yet we started building a system where those who don’t play – or who game the system – are not necessarily worse off.

The answer to this is to ensure firms can reclaim more of the real costs of providing high quality training that focuses on improved outcomes for learners – not just participation. As the CBI has said repeatedly since 2015, that should start with a better reflection of the cost/benefit position firms face when making investment decisions about training.

Up until now, government has stuck to a simplistic definition of employer cost: training cost is only training cost if it is charged for by a provider for off-the-job training on an apprenticeship. This may sound great in Whitehall, but it is nonsense for businesses in Walsall, and across the country.  It is not a model into which one can hammer the entirety of what firms do to support good learning – and it sets up perverse incentives that limit the impact of the policy.

The CBI has always been clear that this needs to change, to take account of things like senior staff time spent supporting training, capital costs for equipment in training centres, or an ability to support other firms with your levy. While we might not have chosen learner salary cost as our first priority, the Conservative proposal at least shows that parties are thinking about repairing the mistakes of 2015.

If accompanied by good standards of quality control and learner protection, more levy flexibility is a change to be welcomed, and will help build a higher performing system.

 

Neil Carberry is Director for People and Skills at the CBI

Free further education for all is not a realistic aim

Manifesto promise: Scrap fees and loans in further education by doubling the Adult Education Budget

Graham Taylor argues AGAINST

There is much to admire in the Labour manifesto on education and skills. Labour has promised to make all further education free at the point of use. And who wouldn’t want this?

They would “introduce free, lifelong education in Further Education (FE) colleges, enabling everyone to upskill or retrain at any point in life”. Fantastic.

More specifically, they promise to “replace advanced learner loans and upfront course fees with direct funding, making FE courses free at the point of use, including English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) courses”.

Oh, and they’re also promising to scrap university tuition fees.

Wonderful.

And boost school funding and introduce free primary school meals for EVERYONE.

READ MORE: Why education should be free for everyone

Hooray!

We know that all manifestos are largely works of fiction, full of motherhood and apple pie promises to attract voters.

Asking me to evaluate their promise is a tough call, though. Saying I don’t support it is hardly likely to make me popular with the learners that access those services, and who struggle to save up for their fees, or are faced with the prospect of thousands of pounds in debt after completing their courses.

So yes – I would love all education to be free. But I would also love free beer for the workers.

Clearly the question here isn’t what we would all like, but what is actually affordable without raising taxes too high or running up more debts.

And frankly, this policy is regressive.

It means the rich will get things for free as well as the poor. At present colleges bend over backwards to waive fees for those who can’t afford them. In any case, many adult learners already have free entitlements to study English and maths; first-time level 2 and level 3 courses and fees are waived for the unemployed.

But why would the state take on such a massive burden for learners who can actually afford to pay for their studies? 

So of course there must be a cap. The unintended consequences of this can be surprising. 

For example in Scotland, where there are no higher education tuition fees, there’s a smaller proportion of disadvantaged learners studying than in England – where there is no cap and fees help to subsidise (via bursaries, etc.) learners who can’t afford to pay. 

In Scotland the rich have ‘crowded out’ the poor; this is what happens when resources are limited. 

Student loans are effectively a graduate tax, as the richer you become, the more you pay back. In many cases (some forecast up to 66 per cent) the loan will never be repaid, because the threshold of earnings, currently £21k, will not be met in some years or at all. 

I would love all education to be free. But I would also love free beer for the workers

That’s a progressive tax.

There are many things that could be improved to help disadvantaged learners access education, but waiving all fees is not the solution.

Here are some things Labour could offer, to achieve the same end: provide funding for a mentoring system for vulnerable learners; improve access to mental health diagnosis and support; force schools to offer better independent careers guidance on post-14 and post-16 educational options that might be best for each learner; allow businesses to choose which courses and qualifications are most appropriate for their workforce, rather than being restricted to apprenticeships.

Or how about this? Protect the FE budget in real terms until 2022 and allow us to charge fees as well. Giving us the freedom to vire funds between 16-18s and adults depending on demand would also be welcomed.

Doubling the Adult Education Budget would cost about £1.5bn extra per year; compare this to the money being poured into the apprenticeship programme (some £2.5bn by 2020). So if adult education takes priority over health, social care, schools, security and infrastructure, then so be it. But they can’t all be affordable without another financial ‘crisis’.

So rather than serve up universal promises, I would feel more confident in Labour’s proposals if they were suggesting policies that more accurately targeted socially and financially disadvantaged and vulnerable learners.

 

Graham Taylor is principal and chief executive of New College Swindon

Two large colleges pull back from inadequate Ofsted ratings

Two large colleges have pulled back from ‘inadequate’ Ofsted ratings – with both recognised for improved performance in reports out this morning.

City of Bristol College and North Shropshire College have now been rated grade three.

Inspectors recognised in today’s report on the former, which was rated grade four 17 months ago, that “senior leaders have recruited specialist managers and staff with relevant skills and experience”.

This had led to “improvements in the quality of provision for learners and a positive change in the expectations of staff and learners”.

They said the college now had “strong leadership”, while at the time of the previous inspection, it “was in a precarious financial situation – the principal [Lee Probert] was new, the senior leadership team was incomplete”, and staff and learners’ expectations were low.

“Since then, senior leaders and governors have secured a better financial position, halted the decline in poor achievement rates and driven forward improvements in the quality of provision across the college.”

But looking to the future, it warned there is still not enough provision “which is good”.

All different provision was rated grade three, except for courses for people with special needs and adult provision which were both ‘good’ (grade two).

Inspectors also recognised that learners received good-quality advice and guidance “throughout their time” at City of Bristol.

But the report warned: “Staff do not coordinate this effectively enough to provide learners with a detailed action plan that moves them towards their careers or next steps; a few learners are unclear of their next steps.”

“The progression of learners and apprentices from one level of course to another, especially from level two to level three, is low,” it added.

Mr Probert said: “With the full support of the city, we have worked tirelessly since January last year delivering improvements for our students and I’m delighted that we are no longer judged to be ‘inadequate’.”

He added: “We asked for an early inspection in order to secure access to the Register of Apprenticeship Training Providers; this means we knew we would go into the inspection with no new data about student success for the current academic year.

“We also know we have not yet achieved everything that we want to, but the fundamental improvements we have made in the key areas of quality of teaching and learning, and student progress and attendance, will ensure those results are much more positive.” 

North Shropshire College, which was rated ‘inadequate’ last January, was graded three for all areas in the latest report, except adult learning programmes which was ‘good’.

It was positive about learners’ personal development, behaviour and welfare, saying “they develop a wide range of skills that support them to move successfully to their next steps into further learning or employment”.

Inspectors added that governors and senior leaders had transformed the college’s approach to protecting learners. “A strong culture of safeguarding now permeates the college at all levels,” the report said.

Adult learning programmes, rated ‘good’, were also praised.

The report said: “Local issues are identified in consultation with employers and relevant courses provided to fill labour shortages.

“Courses have been successfully established to respond to the needs of Syrian refugees. Unemployed adults benefit from short, intensive employability courses to improve their job-seeking skills.”

But it added: “Despite improvements in some areas, managers’ actions have not yet resulted in consistently good teaching, learning and assessment.”

City of Bristol College, with four main campuses across Bristol, had 14,100 learners over the previous contract year.

North Shropshire College is based on two main campuses at Oswestry and Baschurch, with smaller specialist centres in Shipley, Burford and Wem. It had 2,222 learners over the previous full contract year.

The new report recognised that it has made a federation agreement with Reaseheath College, in Nantwich, and is “actively working towards merger”.

Interim principal Peter McCann said: “I know I can speak for myself, the senior leadership team and the board of governors who are proud of the cultural change within the college.

“It is very difficult for a college to be assessed by Ofsted as improving two grades from ‘inadequate’ in learning and skills within the timescale of re-inspection; indeed only one college has achieved this nationally under the revised Ofsted framework.

“That said I believe, as the report states, the changes being made are showing impact but we need to ensure that we reach every part of the college and not just the 80 per cent who have made excellent progress to date.”

Blue pill is tough to swallow

Since the snap election was called by the Conservatives seven weeks ago, it has been interesting to see the reaction to their handling of the media.

The overriding theme has been one of avoidance: stories of the press being locked out of events, being allowed to ask pre-vetted questions only and of ministers darting in and out of back doors have been frequent.

And even when interviews have been granted, journalists have been left complaining of questions going unanswered and replaced with “strong and stable” soundbites.

Most recently, Jeremy Corbyn changed his mind and decided to participate in the TV leadership debate, but Theresa May stayed away.

This prompted a cartoon in the Times in which our prime minister hides behind the sofa.

We’ve drawn up our own version, in which she is seen completing an online course in media management from the safety of her breakfast table.

And we now know, two weeks after we first asked for an interview, that the Conservatives are determined to keep FE Week away from the apprenticeships minister Robert Halfon.

The lack of opportunity to scrutinise the manifesto commitments weakens the democratic process.

Would you choose to buy a medicine from a pharmacy that refused to even make itself available to ask about potential side effects?

I’m not going to endorse one party over another, but the best way to change the behaviour of a salesperson is to refuse to buy their product.

Traineeship to apprenticeship progression rates fall below 20%

The proportion of adult trainees funded by the ESFA who progress onto an apprenticeship has dipped below 20 per cent, FE Week can exclusively reveal.

Traineeships were launched four years ago, as part of the government’s drive to help low-skilled unemployed people below the age of 25 onto apprenticeships.

The scheme, which funds work placements, replaced Access to Apprenticeships and before that, Programme-Led Apprenticeships.

But fears have grown on their low take-up rate and increasingly unclear purpose.

The Department for Education’s said in March that there were 10,500 traineeship progressions in 2015/16. Of these, “7,000 were to a job, apprenticeship, further full time education or other training for those aged under 19, and 3,400 were to a job or apprenticeship for 19-24s.”

FE Week lodged a Freedom of Information request for the second year running in an effort to find out how many progressed to an apprenticeship – originally the main purpose of a traineeship.

The resulting DfE figures for the last full academic year showed that just 600 of 3,400 overall progressions for 19- to 24-year-olds were to apprenticeships.

Adult education can provide a strong foundation to help those in low-income communities break the cycle of deprivation.

That’s just 17.6 per cent, down from 20 per in the previous year.

The proportion of overall progressions to apprenticeships for all age groups stood at 22 per cent for 2014/15.

Last academic year there was an improvement, to 37 per cent, or 3,800 of 10,400.

Having seen the latest figures, shadow skills minister Gordon Marsden was concerned that an overwhelming majority of traineeship learners were still not progressing to apprenticeships, including older learners.

“Anything that further devalues the traineeship brand, which is so important in our view for progression to and expansion of apprenticeships, is to be regretted,” he warned.

“This is why we have pledged to have a proper pre-apprenticeship traineeship scheme for young people.”

The 2017 Labour general election manifesto has pledged to increase capital investment to equip colleges to run “an official pre-apprenticeship trainee programme” – which it is thought could leave traineeships obsolete.

The disappointing progression figures for 19- to 24-year-olds raised questions over whether traineeships should be geared towards younger people not in education, employment or training.

But the Workers’ Educational Association defended the scheme’s ongoing availability to older learners, telling FE Week: “While the benefits of lifelong learning may not be tangible in the short-term, adult education, including traineeships for older learners, can provide a strong foundation to help those in low-income communities break the cycle of deprivation.

“We believe it is important to invest in education and training opportunities for the least advantaged members of our society in order to stand a real chance of improving social mobility.”

Mr Marsden brought poor traineeship progression rates up on the floor of the House of Commons last July, referencing the FE Week story that exposed them for the first time.

He warned at the time that “if we don’t get a proper scheme that fills the needs of the economy and creates more apprentices, then that is no good”.

There were 19,400 traineeship starts in 2014/15, an increase of 86.3 per cent on the previous academic year, and 24,100 in 2015/16.

UTC applications surge after letters sent to parents

The body that runs the university technical colleges has been making bold claims about a surge in demand for places for 14-year-olds.

New figures shared exclusively with FE Week by the Baker Dearing Trust indicate that applications from 14-year-olds are running at nearly “double the rate” compared with last year.

Silverstone UTC, for example, currently has 201 year 10 students applying for a place in 2017/18, despite only 86 showing interest in February. Last year the college, which is based at the famous Silverstone motor-racing track, had 149 year 10s apply in total.

Aston University Engineering Academy in Birmingham had 140 year 10s on its waiting list in 2016/17, but that figure has risen to 270 for this year. And UTC Sheffield has had 389 applications for year 10 this year compared with 218 last year.

If demand truly is on the rise, it will come as a welcome development following years of low student numbers at many UTCs, of which seven have closed or announced plans to do so.

The “trend is very encouraging”, according to Charles Parker, the chief executive of the Baker Dearing Educational Trust.

“Applications for year 10 entry to UTCs in September 2017 are running at more than double the rate compared with this time last year,” he added.

Applications for year 10 entry to UTCs in September 2017 are running at more than double the rate compared with this time last year

BDT claimed this trend is being replicated with many other UTCs, but could not provide other examples.

The UTCs which revealed improved application rates have partly ascribed it to a change in the law, which now requires every local authority in England to write to parents of 13-year-old children telling them about local 14-19 institutions.

These were sent out for the first time in February and March.

Neil Patterson, the principal of Silverstone, which is rated ‘good’ by Ofsted and has 430 learners on roll, said its “unique” location meant Northamptonshire county council and a number of other local authorities wrote to parents, resulting in “a surge of applications like we have never seen before”.

Mr Patterson told FE Week he was “delighted” and that the UTC is “now significantly oversubscribed”, claiming this “shows the problems of recruiting at the age of 14 can be overcome”.

The next area that needs to be addressed, he said, is “decent information being provided in schools”.

Mr Patterson believes this will happen from this September, when the new Baker clause, passed with the Technical and Further Education Bill, will oblige schools to give FE providers, including UTCs, access to their pupils.

Daniel Locke-Wheaton, the principal at the 509-learner Aston University Engineering Academy, also hailed the effectiveness of the letters from local authorities.

While they resulted in more people knowing about his institution, he admitted he had received “numerous complaints” from parents because the letters went out after the application deadline in January.

“They [parents] weren’t very impressed about that,” Mr Locke-Wheaton told FE Week. “This year it will go out in September, so that will make a big difference.

“Parents want the choice. UTCs are not for everybody, but they want to have the option, and that was the biggest anger we’ve had, that they didn’t know about it.”

An FE Week investigation in April revealed that learner numbers dropped at around two thirds of established university technical colleges this academic year.

UTC Plymouth then announced in May that it would not be taking on any new year 10 students from this September owing to dwindling learner numbers, and two weeks ago Leigh UTC in Kent announced it would be opening a feeder school next door to ease recruitment worries.

University technical colleges plan to switch recruitment age to 13

University technical colleges across the country are planning to recruit students a year before their standard 14 starting age, an FE Week investigation has found.

Five UTCs are consulting on taking students in from year nine, instead of year 10, in future academic years – with more expected to follow suit.

The UTC project is currently under the cosh: seven have either closed or announced their intention to do so, suffering from the requirement recruit at 14. FE Week reported two weeks ago that Leigh UTC, in Kent, was opening an 11-to-14 feeder school next door as an attempted remedy.

All five specialist technical providers looking at year 9 starts said they were considering this because of the government’s new longer and harder GCSEs, for which most traditional schools now allocate three years of preparation.

Charles Parker (pictured), chief executive of the Baker Dearing Trust, which holds responsibility for overseeing UTCs and which claims demand for learner places at 14 may be on the rise, told FE Week he “fully supports” the colleges proposing the change.

Students in year nine would still be classed as key stage four learners – the earliest stage UTCs have always been able to recruit from.

“Many schools now allocate three years to the study of GCSEs, increasing key stage four from two to three years,” Mr Parker said. “Where this is the case in the local education landscape it is sensible for UTCs to offer the same.”

Tougher English and maths GCSEs were introduced for exams this summer.

Many schools now allocate three years to the study of GCSEs … it is sensible for UTCs to offer the same

Higher-tier maths papers, for example, previously devoted 25 per cent to questions at the A and A* level. In this year’s exams, questions relevant to grades seven, eight and nine – the new equivalent to A and A* – make up half the paper.

The five UTCs consulting on changing their admissions age to 13 are Liverpool Life Sciences UTC, London Design and Engineering UTC, UTC Cambridge, Sheffield UTC, and Aston University Engineering Academy in Birmingham.

Liverpool Life Sciences, which had 528 pupils on roll as at January last year and is rated ‘good’ by Ofsted, said in its consultation to the local community that a “significant number” of secondary schools in the area now put aside three years for students to prepare for GCSEs.

London Design and Engineering UTC, which only opened this academic year, said the new GCSEs introduced by the Department of Education “particularly in maths and English” place a “greater expectation on what students need to know and master in order to get a good grade”.

As a result, the college is proposing that from September 2018 it will have both a year nine and 10 intake, while from September 2019 it wants a year nine-only intake.

To accommodate the intake of 13-year-olds, it has had to reduce its published admissions number – the amount of students it can recruit – at year 12.

Meanwhile UTC Cambridge, which has 280 learners and is rated ‘inadequate’ by Ofsted, has had to chop its PAN for year 10 students in half to accommodate for the recruitment of year 9s.

From 2018/19 the college will take in 50 students in year 9, 50 in year 10, and 100 in year 12.

Sheffield UTC, one of the more successful institutions of its kind, with 467 students on roll and a ‘good’ Ofsted rating, and Aston University Engineering Academy, which is also rated ‘good’ and has 509 learners, are also consulting on expanding their intakes to year nine from September 2018.

Daniel Locke-Wheaton, principal of Aston, told FE Week he has received an influx of comments from parents complaining that transition at age 14 is now “too late” as a result of the new GCSEs.

NSAFD U-turns on mandatory vetting of apprenticeship qualifications

In an embarrassing U-turn, the National Skills Academy for Food and Drink has dropped controversial plans for mandatory vetting of apprenticeship qualifications.

The body, which leads the food and drink apprenticeship trailblazer group, recently announced that any awarding organisation wanting to develop their own versions of qualifications included in food and drink standards must submit a draft to the chair of the group for approval.

But the NSAFD was forced into a climbdown after FE Week pointed out that the policy contravened the Institute for Apprenticeships’ rules.

The announcement had sparked fears that the NSAFD, which happens to own the only awarding body offering the qualifications in three of the standards, was trying to restrict the market.

After its change in heart, NSAFD’s chief executive Justine Fosh told FE Week that there “had been a widespread understanding in what is a complex landscape, that the employers had a responsibility, to confirm that proposed mandated qualifications were in line with the industry design and therefore the criteria proposed for funding”.

She continued: “However, in dialogue with the IfA it is now clear that this can be done as a voluntary, rather than compulsory approach,” Ms Fosh said.

She also gave her thanks to FE Week “for identifying and helping clarify the situation”.

Four standards developed by the food and drink trailblazer group and approved for delivery include mandatory qualifications.

The qualifications for level two food and drink process operator, level three food and drink advanced process operator, food and drink maintenance engineer at level three are currently only offered by Occupational Awards Limited, which the NSAFD bought in July 2016.

Terry Fennell, the chief executive of awarding body FDQ, which plans to submit a version of the diploma mandated in the level two food and drink process operator standard for approval by Ofqual in June, hit out at the NSAFD.

“A free and open market must come before self-interest,” he said, criticising it for attempting to “arbitrarily extend the remit of the food and drink-related trailblazer it supports with the intention of restricting or sanctioning qualifications that may offer competition to the version already offered by its own AO”.

Mr Fennell said the FDQ version of the food and drink process operations qualification would “comply with Ofqual general conditions of recognition and align with the IfA approved assessment plan”.

He continued: “With validity assured by the regulatory and responsible quality authorities it is for employers and providers to decide, on which qualification they wish to procure.”

The IfA was unable to comment on the controversy, due to the purdah, or period of silence, it is obliged to maintain during the run up to a general election.

Guidance published by the IfA makes it clear that trailblazer groups can’t limit which awarding bodies can offer mandatory qualifications.

Where a standard includes such a qualification, it “must name the qualification in terms which do not ascribe it to a specific awarding body so that any awarding body which is Ofqual regulated and offers that qualification can do so”.

“In the case of a regulated qualification, you should not specify a particular awarding organisation, as you could otherwise prevent another awarding organisation from developing a qualification for the standard.”

In March, FE Week reported that the UK’s food and drink apprenticeship frameworks could be switched off against the government’s wishes.

The NSAFD, which retains the powers of an issuing authority from its previous incarnation as a sector skills council, ran a consultation on whether or not to cancel the frameworks it administers.

Details of “any actions to be taken is expected in April”, according to its website – but nothing has yet been published.

Ofsted watch: Traineeships silver lining for provider stuck on grade three

Independent training provider Nottinghamshire Training Network found itself stuck at a grade three this week, with all its provision deemed to ‘require improvement’ except traineeships, which were rated ‘good’.

Problems with leadership and management were identified at the provider, such as leaders failing “to ensure that subcontractors meet the additional learning needs of all learners and apprentices” and managers collecting “inadequate information on the progression to employment, FE and training of adult learners”.

Tutors and assessors were also said to “place insufficient focus on the development of adult learners’ and apprentices’ English and mathematics skills”.

Ofsted said too many tutors at the ITP made “insufficient use of the results of assessment” to support the progress of learners, and were “insufficiently confident to reinforce effectively the dangers of radicalisation”.

Apprenticeship provision was criticised for low achievement rates and a lack of advice and guidance.

However, strengths identified included effective action “to increase the proportion of apprentices who achieve their apprenticeship framework”, and the successful introduction of traineeship programmes in the current academic year.

There was also some “good use of work placements and experience” by tutors “to help trainees develop useful employment-related skills”.

Nottinghamshire Training Network was given eight points to improve on, including ensuring “newly appointed leaders and managers take swift, decisive actions to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment” and “all subcontractors are held accountable for improving all learners’ and apprentices’ outcomes”.

Staff members were also advised to “promote British values to learners and apprentices and secure their understanding of the risks of radicalisation and its potential impact on their lives and work”.

This week also saw a positive result for Bridgwater and Taunton College, which had its residential provision rated ‘outstanding’ under the social care common inspection framework.

The accommodation is situated in four lodges at a site in the local village of Cannington and with host families in Bridgwater and Taunton. 

There are 39 students under 18 at the Cannington site and 19 young people, including overseas students, staying with hosts.

The experiences and progress of these young people were found to be ‘outstanding’, taking into account how well they were helped and protected and the effectiveness of their leaders and managers.

Ofsted said the college provided “highly effective services that consistently exceed the standards of good”, and contributed to “significantly improved outcomes and positive experiences for young people”.

The grade one was based on “a culture of positivity” and “high aspirations” in an “open and inclusive environment”, with managers leading by example.

Safeguarding was said to be “robust and effective”, creating a feeling of “well-being and security” for residential students.

They were found to be “making excellent progress in vocational and personal skills”, giving them the “knowledge and confidence to succeed in their chosen vocation”.

Care for residential student was described as “highly individualised” and “exceptionally supportive” by the education watchdog, meaning they had “respect for others, leadership and team work” as well as being “very proud of their college”.

Areas for development included the suggestion to review “the arrangements for the oversight and monitoring of the host family provision in Taunton and Bridgwater”, particularly ensuring information and contact numbers were up to date.

 

GFE Colleges Inspected Published  Grade Previous grade
Bridgwater and Taunton College (social care inspection report) 09/05/2017 02/06/2017 1 1
         
Independent Learning Providers Inspected Published  Grade Previous grade
Nottinghamshire Training Network 09/05/2017 31/05/2017 3 3