Apprenticeship quango tender for quality assurance won by incumbent

The Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education has once again awarded its long-term external quality assurance (EQA) contract to Open Awards.

The decision sees a continuation of service from the awarding body who has been delivering quality assurance for apprenticeships assessment on behalf of the institute since 2017.

Its previous long-term contract came to an end in March 2019 but as FE Week reported earlier this month, Open Awards had agreed to extend this work until June while the institute’s “competitive” procurement was finalised.

They demonstrated how they will combine value-for-money with first-rate quality of service

The institute announced today that Open Awards will hold its new EQA contract, which will run until March 2021 and could earn the organisation at least half a million pounds.

“We are delighted to confirm that Open Awards will provide EQA on behalf of the Institute for the next two years,” Nikki Christie, the IfATE’s deputy director for apprenticeships, assessment and quality said.

“They were re-awarded the contract following a competitive tendering process and demonstrated how they will combine value-for-money with first-rate quality of service, delivering against our new EQA framework to ensure high quality end point assessment.”

Heather Akehurst, chief executive of Open Awards, said: “The re-award was a tribute to the hard work undertaken in the last two and a half years by Open Awards staff and importantly the EPAOS with whom we work.”

The IfATE said this new contract will mark a “step-up” in service provision as it requires delivery against a new EQA framework, due to be published by the institute in the coming months.

The institute is the nominated EQA provider for 295 approved standards.

Under its old contract with Open Awards, the institute did not charge end-point assessment organisations (EPAOs) for the quality assurance service.

But this will change as its new contract comes into play.

Tender documents for the institute’s new contract, seen by FE Week, state that “legislation allows the institute to charge EPAOs a fee per apprentice that undertakes an end-point assessment and it is these fees that will pay for the EQA service”.

The re-award was a tribute to the hard work undertaken in the last two and a half years

They add: “The institute’s budget is limited and we are seeking to work with a supplier who will deliver a high-quality service at a price that offers strong value for money.”

The bidding organisation was asked to “confirm what price they would charge per end-point assessment”, and would receive a minimum payment of £20,000 a month for the duration of the contract.

The ESFA sets a funding band for each apprenticeship standard, which is usually the value given to providers to deliver the training.

Up to 20 per cent of the total funding is available to fund the end-point assessment. The EQA cost is paid by the end-point assessment organisation and is factored into the EPA price.

There are currently 18 approved external quality assurance bodies that monitor end-point assessment organisations, to ensure the process is “fair, consistent and robust”.

FE Week revealed the “ridiculous variability” in approved external quality assurance charges in February, which were criticised by sector leaders for ranging from a free service to £179 per apprentice.

Government to fully-fund college pension cost increase

The Department for Education has today revealed it will provide extra funding to cover the rise in pension contributions for colleges.

The announcement followed a consultation launched in January, where the department asked feedback on its proposals to support certain education institutions with the increase to pension scheme in 2019/20.

The DfE had previously said it expected to publish a response in March 2019, but only today confirmed it will fully-fund the increased costs of the scheme for “state-funded schools and colleges, as well as other publicly-funded training providers”, which will cost a total of £940 million.

However, it is not clear for how long the government will provide the extra funding.

Education Secretary Damian Hinds said the “scheme is, quite rightly, one of the most generous pension schemes in the country”  and is aimed at ensuring “schools and colleges can focus their resources on providing the best education”.

It was announced last year that the amount colleges and other public-funded FE training providers must contribute to staff pensions was set to rise from the current rate of 16.48 per cent to 23.6 per cent – an extra £142 million a year – from September 2019.

But because the increase comes into force half way through the financial year, the DfE estimated that colleges would have to pay £80 million extra in 2019/20. This will rise to the full amount of £142 million in 2020/21.    

The Association of Colleges previously warned this publication that the increase in employer contributions could spark a “financial crisis” in FE.

Today, the DfE said FE institutions will receive funding “based on their actual costs”.

The outcome of a valuation of teachers’ pensions was released in August 2018, which the Treasury undertakes every four years, and said public sector workers would get improved benefits from 2019.

Julian Gravatt, deputy chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said it welcomed the government’s decision to “ensure that the increase does not destabilise the sector”.

He added: “We will be pressing government in the spending review to not only maintain this budget but to ensure that colleges have the resources they need to provide high quality teaching and training to young people, adults and employers.”

Julia Harnden, funding specialist at the Association of School and College Leaders, also said the announcement was welcomed as, without this funding, “the extremely serious financial pressures they are already facing would be made even worse”.

However, she warned the funding announcement is for one year and that “we do not know what will happen over the additional cost of the teachers’ pension scheme in subsequent years”.

“This will be a matter for a spending review planned by the government this year which will set departmental budgets for the next three years.

“However, the chancellor has suggested that this spending review will only take place if an EU exit deal is agreed. Schools and colleges are currently unable to accurately plan their long-term budgets, not only in terms of how the teachers’ pension scheme will be funded, but over their income and costs in general. This uncertainty needs to be settled sooner rather than later.”

Apprenticeship funding band reviews to include updated ‘affordability measures’ in wake of budget warnings

The Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education is updating its ‘affordability measures’ when making funding band recommendations.

Minutes published this week for their approval and funding committee, dated 21 March, say the Digital and Data Science Team “gave an update about work to improve the affordability measures, which will be further developed over the next few months”.

When asked about the plans, a spokesperson for the IfATE told FE Week: “The budget for the apprenticeship programme is finite” and affordability was being considered alongside “evidence submitted by Trailblazer groups, guidance from sector experts on our Route Panels, and evidence we have gathered ourselves about comparative training costs”.

And the Department for Education’s Strategic Guidance to the IfATE, published on 27 March, said: “We expect the Institute to consider the wider affordability of the apprenticeships programme when making funding band 12 recommendations.”

The spokesperson would not be drawn on what the specific measures are or would be, beyond saying they were “analysis of the cost of the apprenticeship programme” and that “the measures are being updated to reflect the fact that there is now a larger amount of information related to the cost of apprenticeship standards, and the shape of the programme”.

It was IfATE that first warned of an apprenticeship levy budget over-spend in a presentation to employers at the end of last year.

This was then followed by a National Audit Office report into the programme that found the actual average amount of funding was double the DfE forecast.

And in recent weeks the DfE permanent secretary told the Public Accounts Committee that without additional treasury funding as part of the forthcoming spending review then “tough choices” would need to be made.

IfATE rates reviews have proved controversial so far, with many employer groups opposing reductions that would render the apprenticeships “financially non-viable”.

In the first review launched last May, included 31 of the most popular standards, many of which say a rate reduction.

For example, the level 2 hair professional was cut 22 per cent from £9,000 to £7,000 and the controversial chartered manager degree was cut 19  per cent from £27,000 to £22,000.

The IfATE revealed last December the 30 apprenticeship standards included in its second funding band review, expected to be completed by this summer.

Rate reviews got underway after the institute moved to having 30 funding bands – the maximum rate paid for from the levy – to choose from, up from the previous 15.

According to the IfA’s 2018/19 business plan, the funding band reviews ensure “they support high quality delivery, and maximise value for money for employers and the taxpayer”.

It also said the IfA is “working with DfE to develop the best approach for pricing apprenticeships in the long term.”

When it announced the second review, the institute said “We understand the review might be a concern to employers which is why we are working collaboratively to ensure the review is carried out in an open and fair way, and as quickly as possible.”

Bidders remain in the dark as DfE delays Institutes of Technology tender results

The Institutes of Technology tender has fallen behind schedule, with the final 16 providers left waiting to be told if they have been successful.

The Department for Education released the final stage two of the £170 million competition in October last year, and said it expected to announce the outcome in March 2019.

But FE Week contacted a number of the shortlisted colleges, who told this publication they have not heard anything as of yesterday afternoon.

Uxbridge College, York College and Dudley College confirmed they have not been given any indication to whether their proposals have been the successful.

FE Week has also contacted the DfE to find out the reason of yet another delay.

In May last year, this publication reported the competition was falling behind schedule, with providers who applied to open one IoT not knowing if they had been successful.

IoTs, which were first mooted back in 2015, are intended to bring together FE and HE providers along with employers to deliver technical skills training, with a particular focus on levels four and five.

According to application guidance from the DfE, they will offer “higher-level technical skills on a par with more academic routes” and will “achieve the same level of prestige as universities”.

Between 10 and 15 of the institutes are expected to be created.

In December 2017 the Department for Education said: ” We expect the first IoTs will be open in 2019”.

The 16 IoT proposals currently in the final stage are:

University of Exeter

South Essex College of Further & Higher Education

Queen Mary University London

Weston College of Further and Higher Education

York College

Milton Keynes College

West Suffolk College

Newcastle College Group

University of Lincoln

Barking & Dagenham College

New College, Durham

Harrow & Uxbridge Colleges

North Warwickshire & South Leicestershire College

Solihull College

Dudley College of Technology

Swindon College

Revealed: The 34 colleges with £270m of government loans and bailouts last year

The Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) has revealed the colleges with millions in government loans and bailouts.

According to documents released by the ESFA and analysed by FE Week, a total of 34 colleges across the country received £270 million in Exceptional Financial Support and Restructuring Funding loans and grants by July 2018.

This was the first time the ESFA revealed individual values of grants and loans awarded to colleges. The agency explained it had decided to release this information to allow FE colleges to “compare their financial data with national totals and other colleges and organisations”.

When similar figures were released last year, the Department for Education immediately removed any reference from its monthly expenditure list, and said they would remain secret “to ensure the college’s financial position can be managed effectively during the period of support”.

The documents released last Friday revealed Hull College received the biggest amount in restructuring grands – a total of £34,187,000 – to support its ‘fresh start’ arrangement and to help its “significant financial and operational turnaround”.

FE Week had previously reported that the college received a £54 million government bailout in order to balance the books, which was believed to be the highest ever given to an English college.

The college also said in its 2016/17 accounts, which were published almost 18 months late, that it had overspent £10 million.

Meanwhile, Trafford College was awarded a total of £29.11 million in restructuring grants. The college merged with Stockport College in April last year – just a month after Stockport was rated ‘inadequate’ for the third time in five years.

As a result, the grant was provided to enable the merged college to deliver a “significant financial and quality turnaround”.

The government also awarded Chichester College £3 million in loans (EFS and restructuring grants) and £21.37 million in grants.

The ESFA said the college was given restructuring facility funding to facilitate its merger with Central Sussex College, which had also received exceptional financial support funding and a third successive Ofsted rating of ‘requires improvement’ prior to the merger.

The college was last month named one of the institutions that will receive a total of 1.8 million in grants through a strategic improvement fund, designed to support struggling colleges.

Moreover, the agency has revealed that, of its £470m restructuring facility funding allocation, it has spent £290m as of January this year. It said it has received 78 applications for the restructuring facility during the same period. Of these, 58 have been assessed and approved and five remained in the assessment and approval processes.

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “The department publishes college accounts based on data provided by colleges. It is the responsibility of individual colleges to ensure that the data they submit is accurate and to contact us if they believe the data they submitted is inaccurate.”

See the full list of colleges that received loans and grants as of July last year:

College name
ESFA Loans
(EFS and
restructuring
grant)
ESFA restructuring grant
Total ESFA loans and grants
Hull College
£0
£34,187,000
£34,187,000
Trafford College
£0
£29,112,000
£29,112,000
Chichester College
£3,000,000
£21,373,000
£24,373,000
East Kent College
£0
£16,976,000
£16,976,000
Birmingham Metropolitan College
£15,244,000
£0
£15,244,000
St Helens College
£0
£14,100,000
£14,100,000
Telford College of Arts and Technology
£216,000
£13,373,000
£13,589,000
Lambeth College
£13,586,000
£0
£13,586,000
Nottingham College
£13,000,000
£0
£13,000,000
South and City College, Birmingham
£0
£10,800,000
£10,800,000
City of Wolverhampton College
£6,250,000
£3,424,000
£9,674,000
City of Bristol College
£8,949,000
£0
£8,949,000
Sussex Coast College Hastings
£4,397,000
£3,668,000
£8,065,000
North Shropshire College
£5,874,000
£0
£5,874,000
Stoke-on-Trent College
£5,625,000
£0
£5,625,000
South and West Cheshire College
£5,200,000
£0
£5,200,000
London South East Colleges
£4,401,000
£0
£4,401,000
Lowestoft College
£3,450,000
£742,000
£4,192,000
Cornwall College Group
£3,238,000
£697,000
£3,935,000
South Essex College of Further and Higher Education
£3,500,000
£0
£3,500,000
Accrington and Rossendale College
£3,475,000
£0
£3,475,000
Redcar and Cleveland College
£3,251,000
£0
£3,251,000
North Warwickshire & South Leicestershire College
£2,818,000
£0
£2,818,000
Kirklees College
£2,800,000
£0
£2,800,000
Southport College
£0
£2,737,000
£2,737,000
Berkshire College of Agriculture
£0
£2,575,000
£2,575,000
Ruskin College
£2,280,000
£0
£2,280,000
West Nottinghamshire College
£2,100,000
£0
£2,100,000
Weymouth College
£2,019,000
£0
£2,019,000
Epping Forest College
£900,000
£0
£900,000
South Gloucestershire and Stroud College*
£753,000
£0
£753,000
Cadbury Sixth Form College
£300,000
£0
£300,000
Solihull College
£0
£100,000
£100,000
Cleveland College of Art and Design
£53,000
£0
£53,000
Total 2017/18
£116,679,000
£153,864,000
£270,543,000

 

*South Gloucestershire and Stroud College has said the figure is an “error” either by the ESFA or via data supplied by the college, and claimed that SGSC has not been in receipt of any restructuring loans

Since this article was published a number of colleges have got in touch to say the figures in the government’s data are wrong. If your college has any concerns about the figures please contact the ESFA directly. We’re currently waiting for an explanation from the ESFA.

Revealed: The winners and losers in the £170m Institutes of Technology competition

The Department for Education has today unveiled the colleges and universities in line for a share of £170m in capital funding and a licence to be named an Institute of Technology.

One day after FE Week reported delays in its competition process, due for announcement last month, the department revealed the names of the first successful applicants.

See the list of nine colleges and three universities below.

The government said the institutes will be “unique collaborations” between universities, FE colleges, and employers including Nissan, Siemens and Microsoft.

They will specialise in delivering higher level technical training at level four and five in STEM subjects, including digital, advanced manufacturing and engineering.

According to the DfE, all institutes must hold an Ofsted ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ rating at the time the licence and capital funding agreements are signed.

However, one of the colleges made it to the final list of 12 despite plummeting two Ofsted grades from its previous ‘outstanding’ in December last year.

When asked about how the grade three college could be a successful applicant, a DfE spokesperson simply said: “Swindon College, like all the other successful applicants, put forward a high-quality proposal and met our requirement to be Ofsted ‘good’ or better when they submitted their application in November 2018.

“We have been clear that all the successful applicants must hold an Ofsted ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ rating at the time their licence and capital funding agreements are signed. Until that happens they will not formally become an Institute of Technology.”

Pressed again on how Swindon College can qualify as one of the 12 on this the list of Institutes, the spokesperson replied: “We have nothing further to add to this statement.”

And the DfE did not say how much it planned to award each provider from the £170m capital fund, but Dudley College told FE Week it will receive £16.8 million to support its £32.5 million project. Milton Keynes College revealed it expects to receive £28 million and York College will get around £10 million in capital funding.

The four providers that had made it to the second stage but were not included in the final list were North Warwickshire & South Leicestershire College, West Suffolk College, South Essex College of Further & Higher Education and Newcastle College Group.

A NCG spokesperson told FE Week it had decided to withdraw the bid for an IoT to “focus on the development of Newcastle College University Centre”.

But FE Week has previously reported the government had broken its own rules by putting NCG through the final bid despite its three Ofsted rating.

A spokesperson for the department explained at the time that NCG would need to improve its Ofsted rating by November to have a chance of getting approved. Earlier this month, Ofsted published the results of a monitoring visit, which found the college had made ‘reasonable progress’.

Meanwhile, Marion Plant, principal and chief executive of NWSLC said: “We are disappointed that our bid for grant funding to create a dedicated IoT for logistics has not been taken forward by the DfE. In fact, none of the successful projects are focused on the logistics sector, which is a great pity considering the requirements of the industry.”

Angela O’Donoghue, principal and chief executive of South Essex College, also said she was the college was “disappointed not to have been successful” in its IoT bid.

IoTs were first mooted back in 2015 and are intended to bring together FE and HE providers along with employers to deliver technical skills training, with a particular focus on levels four and five.

According to application guidance from the DfE, they will offer “higher-level technical skills on a par with more academic routes” and will “achieve the same level of prestige as universities”.

The DfE said today the pre-award stage will now start, where the details of each Institutes licence agreements and capital funding will be agreed. IoTs will then receive their licence to operate and start to access their capital to develop the buildings and facilities they need.

The first Institutes are expected to open from September 2019.

Education Secretary Damian Hinds said: “These new IoTs will be the pinnacle of technical training – new collaborations between universities, colleges and business to make sure young people have the skills they need to build a well-paid rewarding, career, while the economy gains the skilled workers it needs to be more productive.”

He added they will help employers get “the skilled workforce they need, especially in much sought-after STEM skills and will offer young people a clear path to a great, well paid career”.

But a spokesperson for the Association of Colleges pointed out there are “many more colleges than the successful ones which have suffered from capital spending in colleges being at a 20-year low because of reductions in government grants and commercial lending”.

“The £170m for IoTs is welcome but we probably need another 50 or 60 IoTs in the next decade.”

The 12 providers leading the successful IoT bids are:

University of Exeter

Queen Mary University London

Weston College of Further and Higher Education

York College

Milton Keynes College

University of Lincoln

Barking & Dagenham College

New College, Durham

Harrow & Uxbridge Colleges

Solihull College

Dudley College of Technology

Swindon College

Chartered Institute of FE admits to having no employees

The Chartered Institution for Further Education has been left with no employees after its CEO quietly stood down in December.

FE Week had been attempting without success to contact the CIFE for several weeks concerning their 2017-18 annual report and accounts, which remain unpublished.

Speaking to FE Week this morning, Dan Wright said there are no longer any employees and that he has been acting as an adviser on a voluntary basis since his departure. The CIFE will continue under the stewardship of the council members.

The future of the institution has early this year been left in doubt after the Department for Education said it would no longer financially support it.

The CIFE, which was conceived in 2012 and has so far received £1.5 million in subsidies, received one final payment at the end of January and has since been on its own.

A statement released just before Christmas said that an “increase in membership and remodelling of our infrastructure enables the institution to stand free of government funding”.

“We expect membership to grow as we use our voice independently”, it said at the time.

According to its website, the CIFE currently has 12 members, far fewer than the 80 Wright previously said it would need to be “completely free” of government subsidy.

FE Week reported last September that the CIFE had received £430,000 from the DfE in 2017-18 under their grant funding agreement.

This was on top of the £1 million it had already received since its conception, as revealed by an FE Week freedom of information request last January.

The institution was the brainchild of the former skills minister John Hayes, and was created to get high-achieving FE providers a royal seal of approval. It took three years for it to be finally granted its royal charter, and it began accepting applications in November 2015.

Colleges and training providers must be rated grade one or two by Ofsted to apply, and also meet the institution’s quality standards.

The annual subscription fee for members who have achieved chartered status is £5,000, but for interested parties there is also a £3,000 non-refundable fee to have an application reviewed in the first place.

List of CIFE council members:

Picture: Happier times in 2016 for the Chartered Institute of FE members at their inaugural admissions ceremony in the House of Lords.

Two years since the levy launched, skills minister reflects on success of a ‘carrot and stick’ policy

Employers with a payroll of £3 million or more made their first monthly apprenticeship levy payment in April 2017 and if they do not use it by the end of this month they will lose it forever.

But despite many apprenticeship courses still in the design phase, the government will not reconsider taking the funds off employers as part of its “carrot-and-stick” approach, Anne Milton has said.

FE Week was speaking to the skills minister in the week that marks the second year of the levy, a policy that she says has made “phenomenal progress”.

The two-year mark brings with it the first 24-month ‘sunset period’, in which employers will lose all of their first monthly payment if they’ve not spent or transferred it yet.

In March, Keith Smith, the Education and Skills Funding Agency’s director of Apprenticeships, told the public accounts committee that employers are expected to lose around £12 million next month, or 9 per cent of what they paid in April 2017.

One key reason why employers have not spent all of their funds is because the apprenticeship standards they want to use are still in the design and development phase. The NHS, for example, has at least 20 standards still being developed that it plans to use to up-skill its workforce.

Asked whether it is fair that the health service will lose a chunk of its public funding next month, Milton said: “It’s quite a tough thing for employers to suck up but it’s only a month’s worth that they lose, not all of it.

“There is an element of carrot and stick in this.

“Would we’ve got the standards in place if there hadn’t been an imperative to do it because the funds were running out? I have to ask myself that question.

“I think it’s tough but we want the skilled workforce and this is the way we get it, and the money will be recycled into apprenticeships.”

Speaking to FE Week last month, the national programme manager for apprenticeships at Health Education England, Lucy Hunte said the NHS expects to lose “huge amounts” this May when levy payments begin to expire.

But Milton argued if “they’ve got big levy funds then they should transfer them out, there is a lot of bodies, charities that delivery NHS services”.

In January the Confederation of British Industry said employers should be allowed to appeal for more time to spend their apprenticeship levy cash if the standards they want to use are still in development.

Under such a system employers would have the right to request an extension on the 24-month limit for spending their levy funds “as long as the business commits the funds” in their accounts.

Asked if the proposal was something that the government was considering, Milton said no.

“The difficulty is that if we make exceptions, then everyone wants to be an exception.”

She added that the levy transfers that are expected this month from big levy payers “could be significant” and “I know a couple of transfers that will take place that will be in favour of the public sector”.

Considering that employers, like the NHS, have not had the full necessary suite of standards ready to use, some will not have been able to make strong progress on the government’s public sector apprenticeship target.

The target, which came into effect in April 2017, obliges public sector organisations to make sure that new apprentices make up at least 2.3 per cent of their overall workforce numbers on average over the next four years.

The NHS had 13,800 apprenticeship starts in 2017/18, which represented 1.2 per cent of a total headcount of 1,194,614.

Asked if there was any view to rethink the target, Milton said: “No, there is not.”

“I actually think that some delegations should probably have more ambitious targets. If you look at some NHS Trusts I visited during National Apprenticeship Week they are doing a fantastic job.”

Since the levy was launched in April 2017, there have been two notable policy changes: upping the amount employers can transfer to other employers from 10 per cent to 25 per cent, and halving the co-investment to 5 per cent.

Asked if there were any other changes in the pipeline, Milton said: “We are really open minded.

“If we introduce flexibilities we have to be able to police that. Most employers are very responsible and will spend it on the things we allow the flexibilities for but there are always people that will try and stretch the envelope and spend on things we don’ think it should be spent on. So we have to be very careful.”

 

Ofsted watch: UTC jumps from ‘inadequate’ to ‘good’

A university technical college was celebrating this week after it climbed its way up from ‘inadequate’ to ‘good’, while six other providers also secured grade two ratings.

But the week wasn’t without its lows, as one provider dropped to ‘inadequate’, three received ‘insufficient’ ratings in early monitoring reports, and another fell from grade one to three.

Bolton UTC, which was given a grade four in October 2017, was lauded by inspectors this week after its acting principal and senior leadership team oversaw “rapid improvements in every aspect” of the 14 to 19 college, at the same time as developing an “inclusive and supportive community”.

Inspectors found the quality of teaching and learning at the now grade two UTC has improved since their last visit, leading to students, including those with special education needs or disabilities, making good progress.

Elsewhere, St Mary’s College, a Catholic sixth form college in Blackburn, saw its rating improve from ‘requires improvement’ to ‘good’.

Inspectors found that governors, leaders, managers and staff have created an “aspirational culture” and now provide a “high-quality education which supports students to fulfil their potential”.

Ofsted also upped Brighter Futures Merseyside’s grade from three to two this week.

Inspectors reported that tutors at the private provider have “very good subject knowledge” and direct experience of the sectors in which they teach, and learners benefit from “high-quality” resources and sector-specific digital technologies that they will encounter in future employment.

LIPA Sixth Form College was awarded ‘outstanding’ across the board in its first-ever full inspection. The Liverpool-based free school for 16-18 year olds was found to have created a culture in which staff have “very high expectations”, with students aspiring to reach “exceptionally high standards” in their written work and practical skills.

Inspectors also said students benefit from “consistently high-quality teaching from dedicated, inspirational and experienced tutors” and a “well planned” project-based study programme.

The London College of Beauty Therapy also received a grade two, going up from a three. The report said lecturers and assessors plan learning well, and engage learners to that they make good progress and achieve their potential.

It was also a good week to Envisage and Debut Training Academy, which were both given grade twos in their very first full inspection report.

Ofsted found the large majority of learners at Envisage achieve their qualifications and do so within the planned time and pursue higher level study or move into employment or more demanding work roles afterwards.

Learners and apprentices at Debut Training Academy were found to gain good skills that make them employable within the “competitive” beauty industry.

Meanwhile, the Reynolds Group maintained its ‘good’ rating with Ofsted.

However, Moor Training, EMA Training and Vogal Group were found making ‘insufficient progress’ in at least one field judged in their early monitoring visits of their new apprenticeship provision.

Ofsted said Moor Training’s leaders and managers have “insufficient knowledge to develop and provide a fully successful apprenticeship programme”, and do not evaluate the quality of on and off-the-job training accurately because “they do not know how to do so”.

EMA Training was rated ‘insufficient’ across the board after Ofsted found leaders and managers do not monitor the delivery of the programmes “effectively” and “do not understand fully” the quality of apprentices’ experiences or the slow progress they made, according to the visit report.

Vogal Group received one ‘insufficient’ rating as Ofsted found its safeguarding arrangements are “not effective”.

And ProCo NW Limited, a private provider based in Wigan, went from a grade three to a four after inspectors found the quality of provision has “not improved sufficiently”.

The provider’s leadership and management of subcontracted courses, which account for almost half of the provision, are “poor”, and achievements are “too low” for apprentices.

Meanwhile, adult and community learning provider Education and Training Skills Ltd fell from ‘outstanding’ to ‘requires improvement’, after Ofsted found the quality and effectiveness of its provision has “declined progressively”.

Inspectors said the standards of training and support apprentices receive are not consistently high and that too many apprentices are not making the progress they should be making.

Simian Risk Management Ltd, in its first full inspection, was rated ‘requires improvement’ after inspectors found the private provider has been slow to “prioritise” improving the quality of teaching and learning.

Pennine Camphill Community, in the meantime, received two ‘insufficient progress’ and one ‘reasonable’ in a monitoring visit after it was rated grade three in April 2018, and NCG, the country’s largest college group, was found making ‘reasonable progress’ in all areas after being judged ‘requires improvement’ in May last year.

Five private providers – Crown Vocational Training Limited, TRS Training Limited, First Intuition Bristol Limited, Royal British Legion Industries and Developing ‘U’ Ltd – were found to be making ‘reasonable progress’ across the board in early monitoring visits of their new apprenticeship provision, while another, Runway Apprenticeships Limited, was found making ‘significant progress’.

Beacon Education Partnership received one ‘insufficient’ and three ‘reasonable’ progress judgements in a monitoring report that took place after it was rated grade three last year.

And finally, employer provider Select Service Partner UK Ltd maintained its ‘requires improvement’ rating.

Independent Learning Providers Inspected Published Grade Previous grade  
Beacon Education Partnership Limited 05/03/2019 04/04/2019 M 3 RIRRR
Debut Training Academy Limited 05/03/2019 03/04/2019 2 n/a  
Envisage 06/03/2019 01/03/2019 2 n/a  
Crown Vocational Training Limited 07/03/2019 02/04/2019 M M RRR
Vogal Group Limited 27/02/2019 03/04/2019 M n/a RRI
Runway Apprenticeships Limited 28/02/2019 03/04/2019 M M SSR
TRS Training Limited 13/03/2019 03/04/2019 M M RRR
EMA Training Limited 27/02/2019 03/04/2019 M M IIR
First Intuition Bristol Limited 05/03/2019 03/04/2019 M M RRR
Royal British Legion Industries 19/03/2019 04/03/2019 M M RRR
Simian Risk Management Ltd 05/03/2019 05/04/2019 3 n/a  
Developing ‘U’ Ltd 06/03/2019 03/04/2019 M n/a RRR
Moor Traning Ltd 13/03/2019 05/04/2019 M n/a IRI
The London College of Beauty Therapy Ltd 12/02/2019 30/03/2019 2 3  
ProCo NW Limited 12/02/2019 02/04/2019 4 3  
Brighter Futures Merseyside Limited 26/02/2019 01/04/2019 2 3  
The Reynolds Group Limited 26/02/2019 03/04/2019 2 2  

 

Sixth Form Colleges Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
St Mary’s College 27/02/2019 04/04/2019 2 3

 

Adult and Community Learning Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Education and Training Skills Ltd 12/03/2019 01/04/2019 3 1

 

Employer providers Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Select Service Partner UK Ltd 26/02/2019 01/04/2019 3 3

 

Other (including UTCs) Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Bolton UTC 13/03/2019 03/04/2019 2 4

 

Specialist colleges Inspected Published Grade Previous grade  
Pennine Camphill Community 13/03/2019 02/04/2019 M 3 IIR

 

GFE Colleges Inspected Published Grade Previous grade  
NCG 27/02/2019 04/04/2019 M 3 RRR

 

Sixth Form Colleges Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
LIPA Sixth Form College 26/02/2019 01/04/2019 1 n/a