Youth organisations including the Scouts, Duke of Edinburgh Award and the National Union of Students have launched their own curriculum and assessment review to shadow the government’s.
Organised by climate action charity OVO Foundation, the youth-led review is “essential to the legitimacy of the government’s review” according to its chair, the National Union of Students president Amira Campbell.
Education secretary Bridget Phillipson appointed Professor Becky Francis to lead a curriculum and assessment review shortly after the July general election.
A call for evidence was launched in September and closes this Friday, and Francis has been touring the country hosting roadshow events seeking views on the most needed changes in curriculum and assessment for children and young people up to age 19.
Twelve young people will be appointed as panellists for the shadow review, which has been launched in part because the call for evidence and roadshows have not been accessible to students.
UK Youth, SOS-UK, Young Citizens and the National Youth Agency are also signed up.
Campbell said: “Students know firsthand what does and doesn’t work in the current curriculum.
“We know that meaningful inclusion of youth voice is essential to the quality and legitimacy of the government’s review, and this shadow review is the perfect avenue to lay out students’ and young people’s visions of what a truly liberated, inclusive and innovative curriculum could and should look like.”
Organisers said the shadow review will run its own set of roadshows and calls for evidence, and aims to publish an interim and final report ahead of Francis.
An interim report from Francis is expected in early 2025 with a final report due in autumn 2025.
Student volunteer Enfys said: “Our shadow review will demonstrate the range of issues that young people care about and how this could be better reflected in the curriculum and in how we are assessed.
“I don’t feel that the curriculum reflects the fact that young people are growing up in a world shaped by the climate emergency and ecological crisis. This is an exciting opportunity to change our education, and we are ready to share our views with the DfE.”
The government’s review panel, led by Francis has two college principals but no young people.
Francis told the Association of Colleges annual conference last week that she “wanted to avoid the sort of tokenism of putting a single young person on the panel to reflect all young people, which is, of course, impossible”.
Curriculum issues
Phillipson tasked Francis with coming up with recommendations that could improve outcomes for young people, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, without overloading education staff.
The government said at the time: “The review will look at ensuring all young people aged 16 to 19 have access to rigorous and high-value qualifications and training that will give them the skills they need to seize opportunity as well as ensuring they are ready for the changing workplace.”
Principals Lisa O’Loughlin, from Nelson and Colne College, and John Laramy, from Exeter College, are members of the panel alongside Francis.
Francis is expected to make a recommendations on the future of the government’s controversial GCSE English and maths resits policy and on the “complex” landscape of education pathways for young people at levels 2 and 3.
But Francis told the Association of Colleges annual conference last week that a “stretched” workforce is among “capacity issues” in further education that will limit her final recommendations.
Skills England has launched an “initial engagement exercise” with employers in priority sectors on what non-apprenticeship training should be funded through the new growth and skills levy.
The quango’s informal consultation will involve construction, health and social care stakeholders, and the eight “growth-driving sectors” identified in the government’s industrial strategy green paper.
In an update today, the Department for Education said its new agency – currently set up in “shadow” form – will run the exercise “in November and December”.
Assessments of each sector’s skills needs should be published “early 2025”.
Sectors identified as having “high growth potential” in the green paper are:
advanced manufacturing
clean energy industries
creative industries
defence
digital and technologies
financial services
life sciences
professional and business services
They were chosen based on the UK’s current and emerging “strengths”.
Construction and health and social care are also priorities as they are “essential” to the government’s five missions.
It remains to be seen precisely which organisations Skills England will engage with or how they will be selected.
However, “stakeholders” have been invited to email evidence to the DfE.
Skills and the levy
Labour announced its intention to widen the apprenticeship levy into a new growth and skills levy in 2022. It will allow a broader range of training to be funded through the levy, although a timeline for implementation is yet to be released.
Skills England will play a “crucial role” in deciding what training is eligible through assessments of skills needs and “extensive engagement” with the skills system.
The industrial strategy suggests that the Office for Investment and Skills England will also offer investors a “skills triage service.”
According to Skills England’s first report, published in September, the agency planned to conduct a series of roundtables and webinars in the autumn to “further test and refine the initial assessment of skills needs.”
It is also expected to work closely with the Migration Advisory Committee to grow the domestic skills pipeline.
Fiona Aldridge, chief executive officer of the Federation for Industry Sector Skills & Standards (FISSS), said: “We welcome Skills England’s intention to consult with employers and other key organisations to provide a view on what training should be available through the growth and skills levy – and would encourage the government to be proactive in reaching out to all those who can usefully inform this work.
“It is helpful to see that the consultation includes construction and health and social care, alongside the Industrial Strategy’s eight growth-driving sectors, given that they account for nearly 20 per cent of jobs across the economy and are integral to achieving the government’s missions.”
Jill Duffy will step down as leader of the OCR exam board after seven years at the helm.
Duffy will leave her role as group managing director for UK education at Cambridge University Press and Assessment, OCR’s parent organisation, in September.
She will take on “new non-executive positions” as she “steps back from full-time executive leadership”.
Duffy joined OCR as chief executive in 2018, having previously worked as senior vice president of Pearson’s schools arm.
OCR said it had grown and introduced “innovations” such as digital exams and a new GCSE in natural history during her tenure.
But the landmark new GCSE is unlikely to be introduced by its original target of next September, FE Week’s sister publication Schools Weekpreviously revealed.
‘A privilege’
Duffy is also chair of the Joint Council for Qualifications board and a governor of Oxford Brookes University.
“I’ve loved this job. It’s a privilege to work with such a talented team of people who really care for and connect with students, teachers and society,” Duffy said.
She said the OCR job “was, and is, in many ways, my dream role”.
“It brings together my passion for education making a difference in young people’s lives, and in making an organisation work for the benefit of all,” she added.
Duffy said she will ensure a “smooth transition” before stepping down.
The search for her successor starts this week, OCR said.
Peter Phillips, Cambridge University Press and Assessment’s chief executive, said Duffy has “achieved a huge amount for education” in her seven years at the top of OCR.
“Her commitment to learners, expertise in the sector and personal leadership have been outstanding. Jill’s relentless focus on doing what’s right for students and for teachers is an inspiration to everyone who works with her,” he added.
Before joining Pearson, Duffy spent 22 years in educational publishing, beginning her education career as an editor at Oxford University Press.
She has a PGCE and a degree in English Literature from Oxford University.
Security and construction regulators have been hauled in for a summit to clamp down on qualification fraud.
Exams regulator Ofqual has also today published a five-point “counter fraud action plan” that includes “formalising” information sharing with other agencies to identify the scale of malpractice.
It follows high-profile cases of qualifications fraud involving security guards and an FE Week investigation that found a flourishing trade in fake Construction Skills Certification Scheme (CSCS) cards sold on social media.
Today’s summit attendees reportedly included the regulator Security Industry Authority (SIA), licensing body Construction Skills Certification Scheme (CSCS) and other “government agencies and ministries”.
‘Work ever more closely’
Ofqual’s chief regulator Sir Ian Bauckham said: “Our action plan reflects the strong commitment made by key agencies to fight qualification fraud.
“We’ll work ever more closely to prevent, disrupt, and detect fraud in qualifications wherever it occurs.”
Ofqual’s action plan includes issuing a “fraud prevention advice note” to awarding organisations, exploring how to share intelligence “more easily”, and a commitment to “improve awareness”.
The government will also “make it easier” to report suspicious activity by raising awareness of possible indicators of fraud and how it can be reported.
It comes weeks after the exam regulator launched a consultation on new so-called “principle conditions” that would require awarding organisations to “act with honesty and integrity” and “promote public confidence” in qualifications.
Cheating and fake certificates
According to Ofqual, qualification fraud is an “ever present risk” in England’s regulated qualification market, which is worth over £800 million a year in entry fees.
The watchdog said there is a risk of malpractice in all qualifications, but qualifications that are required to gain a licence, job or immigration status are “more likely to be targeted by those willing to commit fraud”.
Fraud can involve fake certificates, delivering ‘fast-track’ training and helping learners cheat during tests.
Suspected fraud should be reported to awarding organisations, which Ofqual requires to take “all reasonable steps” to prevent malpractice.
A BBC exposé last year alleged two London-based security training providers offered shortened courses for a higher fee, forged timesheets and, at one, taught ways to “kill and be killed”.
Ofqual found the SQA had failed to investigate malpractice at centres offering health and safety certificates needed for CSCS cards between 2017 and 2019, but did not inform the safety card organisation until this year.
A historic case of alleged qualification fraud in 2015 saw awarding organisation Industry Qualifications hit with a £50,000 fine over its handling of security guard qualifications.
The firm was eventually slapped with a £115,000 fine and legal costs after a four-year appeal.
Paul Fullwood, director of inspections and enforcement at the SIA, said: “We’re committed to combatting malpractice and a concerted effort from all parties involved working together to share information and best practice is vital to tackle this issue.
“This summit represents the collaboration we need to build on in taking forward our shared vision to root out qualification fraud.”
A spokesperson for CSCS said: “We commend Ofqual for convening industry leaders to address this issue. Ensuring that qualifications are obtained through legitimate means is essential for maintaining safety and trust in the construction industry. CSCS remains committed to working with others to combat qualification fraud.
“In cases where CSCS is notified a card was gained using a fraudulently obtained qualification the card is cancelled immediately – this means when the card is next checked using the CSCS Smart Check software it will alert the site manager that the card is no longer valid.”
Ofsted chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver talks to FE Week senior reporter Josh Mellor about the next inspection framework and why accountability measures in further education (FE) mean it’s complicated to “unpick” one-word judgements.
Q: At last week’s Confederation of School Trusts conference you said some school leaders were “putting pressure on inspectors and making the inspection process more adversarial”. Have you seen the same issue in FE?
A: No – I’ve been really clear with my staff that they should be professional, courteous, empathetic and respectful, and I wouldn’t expect any one of our staff to deliver a standard less than that. I expect and hope that we receive that in return.
If I look holistically across all of the 97,000 providers we inspect, where we see the greatest challenge more recently is in the multi-academy trust world where sometimes the tension between a headteacher and an executive can lead to a heightened dynamic on inspection.
But in colleges, we find a much more collaborative, cooperative inspection model. In FE it’s really quite empowering to see the nominee on an inspection who I think is the bridge between the inspectors and the inspected.
Something I’m thinking about is: is that something I should consider for other remits? It helps us significantly with the professional relationship we have in FE.
Q: So FE provider inspections are less adversarial despite the fact that the stakes are higher due to one-word judgments still being in place, unlike for schools?
A: It’s something that we’re committed to removing. It’s just that in state schools, the law, the Education and Inspections Act 2006, still requires Ofsted to identify an acceptable, and therefore an unacceptable, standard of education, and schools that are in special measures and require significant improvement – we call it serious weaknesses.
Despite the removal of the single-word judgment, the law requires us to make that decision and the law isn’t changing at the moment.
Now, in the FE world, it’s in the contract as well as intervention from the DfE and the regulator. So, unpicking the financial contract requires them to make a determination on the back of an Ofsted grade. That has to be worked out and can’t just be a unilateral decision because that would leave providers and the DfE unsure of what to do if they had a poor inspection outcome.
Ofsted is working to develop an inspection framework which meets the needs of the sector but doesn’t thwart government in its right to develop a contract with FE and to intervene as the regulator.
Q: Data shows there hasn’t been an ‘inadequate’ report in FE since Ofsted dropped overall judgments for schools in September. Is that a coincidence or has there been a conscious decision to avoid giving the lowest grade internally?
A: No, we don’t do anything like that. We’re really pleased by the quality of what we see out in the FE world. It’s really encouraging, and so I’m delighted at the quality of consistency in our training. Our inspectors will find what they find.
No one is ever put under pressure to change a grade or to meet a quota. We have a clear, standard framework, which is consulted on.
Inspectors inspect against that framework. We quality assure their evidence gathering against the framework, their judgment is their judgment.
Q: Ofsted is set to consult on a new inspection framework next year – will there be a separate framework for FE?
A: My intent is to look at providing frameworks which meet the needs of individual remits, from early years through to FE and eventually children’s services and social care. The challenge, which we will want to talk about in the consultation, is do parents want to see a coherent system that they can easily understand?
I really want to focus on the links between different areas because I think we’ve become too compartmentalised.
Q: Report cards are due to be rolled out next September. Are they definitely going to happen for FE and skills?
A: Let’s be clear, the report card is something that the secretary of state has talked about. I’m talking about a report card inspection framework.
Now, whether or not the secretary of state and the Department for Education choose to add over time and build upon a minimum viable product to make the report card even more sophisticated, to provide more information to learners, to parents and to providers – I’m sure that’s something they will want to really think hard about.
Holex chief executive Caroline McDonald is on a mission to increase education opportunities for those who missed out on the best start in life
As a young graduate living in South Africa, Caroline McDonald was walking through Cape Town one morning listening to music on her portable CD player, on her way to the homeless boys’ hostel where she was a volunteer.
At the time (2001), she was working as a night manager at a backpackers’ hostel while also volunteering at the hostel.
Some boys from a local street gang approached and asked if they could listen to what was, to them, her strange musical contraption (she was playing “Travis on repeat, in between Phil Collins”).
She handed it over and they “popped it in their ears and laughed”. Onlookers “didn’t know what to make of it” in a city where muggings were common. “But I trusted them”, she says. They repaid her trust and handed it back.
The story is typical of McDonald’s faith in human potential and the importance of giving opportunities to those who lack the best start in life. These days she draws on those values while leading Holex, representing the country’s 140-plus adult community education providers who are themselves busy turning lives around.
McDonald on Table Mountain overlooking Cape Town
Her experiences in South Africa, where she confronted “off the charts” poverty and young gang members “fighting for survival”, were the catalyst that compelled her to carve out a career helping adults to access education.
In August she became the first chief executive of Holex, leading three staff including Sue Pember, “the queen of adult education”, who has been its policy director for the past nine years.
The team has no office building – McDonald speaks to me on her son’s laptop (hers is being fixed) from her living room in Maidstone, Kent. But, while small in human resource, Holex is mighty in clout.
In “every meeting” that McDonald has had with key sector players, including the FE commissioner and DfE officials, she has been told that “Holex punches above its weight”.
But McDonald has been taken on to help it grow – “not just in our reach, but the representation of our membership”.
Her job description explains how the infrastructure supporting adult education has “reduced and changed”, with members looking to Holex for “added advice and guidance. In response, Holex is now ready to grow into a new form.”
The mice and the pumpkin
It has already come a long way since being formed in 1993. A year earlier, general FE was removed from local authority control, leaving councils with responsibility for adult education services that were then (bizarrely) known as “large external institutions”.
Holex was formed to support their heads, and the somewhat clunky name it was given – heads of large external institutions – stuck.
For the next 10 years adult education providers saw cash pouring in from central government and the European Social Fund (ESF), with public spending on adult skills in England peaking at £6.3 billion in 2003-04. By 2022-23 it had shrunk by 30 per cent to £4.4 billion, with adults’ classroom-based learning decreasing by two-thirds, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
In 2016 Holex’s members included over 700,000 learners. By last year that had shrunk to 400,000.
“Trying to run a service within a local authority is incredibly hard when they’re being squeezed from every angle,” says McDonald.
While some see adult providers as the “Cinderella of the education sector”, she believes they are “the mice and the pumpkin, scrambling around for the scraps. Yet, we’re the ones that magically make things happen on the tiniest crumbs.”
While children’s education “resonates with the public on a higher level”, sometimes “it feels like working with adults is not the sexiest of jobs”. It’s very difficult to engage in an emotive fight for funding when “no one wants to take away money from children”.
Despite this, providers have somehow managed to improve the quality of their services: 97 per cent of Holex’s members are rated ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted, up from 88 per cent four years earlier. Yet there is little public awareness of how adult education is being run locally.
Almost 70 per cent of the country is now devolved, with regional combined authorities equipped to manage their own adult education budgets.
Control over the budget is a carrot being dangled in all the new devolution deals. But the “classic electoral rhetoric” of combined authority mayors tends to be around public transport and jobs – not adult education.
Last week, Holex ran a webinar called “influencing the influencers”, helping its members to “speak to this new tier of politician, policymaker and commissioner, particularly in mayoral combined authorities”.
Providers within local authorities “don’t have comms teams or policy advisers – experts at their fingertips to write a paper and pop it on the mayor’s desk – so we’re trying to help them”.
There is also the challenge of delivering local agendas while being “dictated to on a national level through wider budgets and policy decision-making”.
In a recent survey, over 90 per cent of Holex members saw the interpretation of new government policy as a “high” or “very high” priority when it comes to the support they need.
A Brum start
McDonald has spent the past two decades watching policy shifts in adult education from a different angle, in roles that involved community outreach and engagement work for the university sector.
The eldest of four siblings, she was the first in her family to go to university, studying politics at Leicester. She hails from Birmingham’s Peaky Blinders territory of Small Heath but believes she “must be the only person” in the city not to have watched the show.
As a “huge Aston Villa fan”, she never misses watching Match of the Day with her 13 and 10-year-old sons, Glenn and Shaun.
Watching Aston Villa with kids Glenn and Shaun and dad Pete
McDonald’s mum was only 19 when she was born. Her parents split up when McDonald was 12 and she lived with her dad, Pete, a former marine who left school at 16 but encouraged his children to push themselves academically.
He discovered a love of learning history and geography later in life, which influenced McDonald’s conviction that “it’s nonsensical” to believe that “education should be closed off because you’re no longer classed as young”.
After graduating and moving to Cape Town, she met her husband, a Dutch engineer travelling the world. She checked him into the hostel where she worked. They have been together ever since.
Human jigsaws
On returning to England a year later, McDonald moved to London, where she ventured into outreach work for Kilburn Into Training and Employment (KITE). The now defunct charity benefited from “loads” of ESF money targeting neighbourhoods needing skills improvements.
McDonald helped local people to develop their CVs and interview skills. One single mum, Deli, was “highly capable” despite having mental health problems. She was determined to be a positive example to her son.
McDonald put support around her that enabled her to do a level 2 course. This provision was “hyper-local” – a really important factor in getting many adults learning again – and provided “at a pace suited to her”.
She thinks that adult education has felt the cuts “most acutely” in the loss of such “hyper-local providers and charities … Without them, you just take away opportunities to engage with adults.”
McDonald learned to reject the misconception that adults “only have ambition for their children, not for themselves”. She saw them as “human jigsaw puzzles”.
Typically, adults cannot progress in their education and training until “every single piece of their puzzle is in place”. This might include “childcare, benefits, or sorting their mum out on a Wednesday… then, they’re absolutely ready to rock”.
Outreach for HE
She spent the next two years as a community outreach manager for South Bank University in London, boosting its local community relations. She had “an absolute blast” on information stands at Elephant & Castle shopping centre, directing locals to careers guidance and taster courses.
Sometimes, people “just wanted to be heard and told, ‘you’re not incapable’”. Others wanted help finding pathways to their dream careers.
McDonald spent the next 18 years at Birkbeck University, starting in a role heading up a new outreach project in pre-Olympics Stratford. The area’s demographics were completely different to the Bloomsbury-based university’s traditional intake.
Birkbeck had received significant funding from the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) to take a “more flexible approach to learning, in a part of London where HE participation was really low”. McDonald was “proud as punch” to have been part of a venture that “really changed Birkbeck”.
She also got involved in applying for funding and developing access agreements at a more strategic level. But she became painfully aware of the difficulties involved in “continuing the mission to be a mature learning institution”, when “that market was diminishing”.
“How do you keep your values going when all the pressures around you are saying, ‘don’t do it?’ That was really hard.”
She started working with local authorities, including Camden and Barking and Dagenham, to explore the “hyper-local perspective around what their residents needed”, then tailoring Birkbeck’s programmes around those needs.
A free community leadership programme was launched to help local volunteers to become “advocates and activists”.
It helped them to “identify and tackle a problem at a community level, while also giving them analytical thinking and research skills. At the end, you’d say to them, ‘look, you’ve just done a university module’ and they wouldn’t even know it.”
The golden thread
When she joined Holex, McDonald was already familiar with the adult education sector, but she was still surprised by the “sheer volume of what they do that isn’t talked about enough”.
She has taken the helm at a time of great need for more investment in adult education; the national retirement age keeps creeping upwards, and the employment rate of the over-50s has decreased each year post-pandemic (from 72.5 per cent in 2019 to 70.7 per cent in 2023).
Meanwhile, the rate of 16 to 24-year-old NEETs (not in employment, education or training) was up last year. McDonald is concerned that higher wage bills as a result of post-budget tax changes will see it spiral further, piling pressure onto adult education providers.
While at Birkbeck she prepared the university for the lifelong learning entitlement, which had initially been due to launch in February 2025 but has been pushed back to January 2027. She even held a presentation for Holex members on the issue. But she worries that the entitlement “won’t benefit adults unless you have an adult education system that prepares them for study”.
She finds it “hilarious” that there is currently no national lifelong learning strategy around the entitlement. She and Pember “talk all the time” about the need for one.
Just as championing adult education has been a golden thread running through her career, McDonald is now passionate about making it a “golden thread running through this government’s policy decisions”.
She gets frustrated on her members’ behalf, that the “security of funding and longer-term planning that could really make a difference in communities just isn’t happening the way it should.
“There’s incredible provision that exists up and down the country. But you don’t always know it’s there until you need it.”
A sixth form college in Leeds has received its third consecutive ‘outstanding’ grade from Ofsted.
Notre Dame Catholic Sixth Form College was awarded a grade one in all six areas for students’ “exceptional behaviour” and “ambitious” leaders, according to a report published today.
At the time of inspection, the college had 2,744 enrolled students, mostly on level 3 qualifications, predominantly A-levels and a smaller group on T Levels.
The college first received a grade one rating from Ofsted in 2008, and then again in 2022.
In its third ‘outstanding’ report, Ofsted inspectors highlighted how Notre Dame Catholic Sixth Form College made a “strong” contribution to meeting skills needs.
Inspectors found the college works with local employers, universities and community organisations to “plan their provision precisely”.
To develop the local health workforce for example, the college linked up with the local NHS trust, universities, local college leaders and community groups to ensure that the work placement for its T Level health course gives students exposure to clinical settings.
“Early in their placements, students have a range of experiences, including sterilising equipment and observing surgery,” Ofsted observed.
In college, leaders place a very “strong focus” on the quality of education, the report said. They gave students work-related experience in simulated environments, such as mock courtrooms for criminology students.
As a result, inspectors found “students develop the skills, habits and virtues that they need to thrive in life and work, becoming well-rounded individuals with a strong sense of citizenship”.
The report also highlighted the sixth form college’s “experienced and well-qualified” teachers who “blend the development of relevant skills seamlessly through their planning and approach”.
The watchdog said teachers frequently revisit past content and use a range of innovative methods to engage students and ensure they achieve “very well”.
For the college’s 300 SEND students, inspectors said leaders designed an inclusive curriculum that “very effectively” meets their needs.
“Students progressively develop their knowledge and skills while increasing their independence and autonomy. As a result, they make excellent progress, achieve their qualifications and, where applicable, the targets in their education, health and care plans,” the report said.
The report also commended Notre Dame for fostering a culture of “high expectation and ambition” that students thrive in.
“Staff create an ethos in which every student is supported to reach their academic and personal potential, regardless of their starting points. This ethos is firmly rooted in the college’s Catholic values and a commitment that every student becomes the ‘best they can be’,” the report said.
Principal Justine Barlow said: “We are immensely proud to share this outcome. This success reflects the dedication of our staff, the hard work of our students, and the distinctive ethos of Notre Dame. Our commitment remains to help every student reach their full potential, guiding them to become ‘the best that they can be’ and preparing them for bright and successful futures.”
Previous Job: Director of Young People’s Essential Skills, South Bank Colleges
Interesting fact: Asma was in the territorial army and worked as a security guard while doing her degree
Helen Wooldridge
Vice Principal Growth, Planning & Performance, Bishop Burton College
Start date: October 2024
Previous Job: Campus Principal, East Riding College
Interesting fact: Helen is a big fan of heavy rock/metal music and has seen over 250 bands live in concert
Scott Forbes
Managing Director, EducationScape
Start date: January 2025
Previous Job: Acting CEO, Skills and Education Group
Interesting fact: In his younger days with the British Council’s global changemaker programme, Scott recalls attending international summits with world leaders and celebrities like the Crown Princess of Norway, President Clinton, Gordon Brown and Annie Lennox
The Association of Colleges held a closed session at this week’s conference to debate the pros and cons of a pay review body for colleges. Afterwards, FE Week spoke with chief executive David Hughes to find out how discussions for this “complex” but “seductive” proposal had progressed.
While the creation of a pay review body for further education is “seductive”, leaders are “quite nervous” about the proposal, says David Hughes.
The chief executive of the Association of Colleges said his organisation had informally consulted members about the prospect of a pay review body in recent months as a vehicle to close the £9,000 pay gap between school and college teachers.
He told FE Week the AoC began canvassing opinions when it anticipated a change in government, since it considered Labour was “more likely” to support the setting up of independent pay review bodies that make pay recommendations for public sector workforces.
The first evidence of this came last month when the government unveiled plans to revive the School Support Staff Negotiating Body and set up an adult social care negotiating body.
Seductive but complex
The arguments for a FE pay review body were strengthened after the Department for Education excluded FE colleges from a £1.2 billion pay rise pot in July and used the excuse that colleges did not have their own pay review body like schools do through the School Teacher Review Body (STRB).
Hughes said: “It’s a seductive idea, because you go, ‘wouldn’t it be lovely if we just had one’, and it said colleges need a 35 per cent pay award and then DfE went, OK, we’ll do it,’ and Treasury gave the money.”
But even if the money was there for universally funded pay rises, an FE pay body would have an “enormous” job to standardise wages across the sector because pay scales vary between colleges.
“We know that a lot of colleges will pay a premium for a construction lecturer, for instance, because they need to recognise the labour market as it is,” Hughes explained.
In September, education secretary Bridget Phillipson instructed the STRB to consider the impact on FE when making recommendations on teacher pay. Sources at the time speculated that official advice from the STRB on the gap between school and college pay would be harder for the Treasury to ignore.
Ultimately, Hughes thinks a new FE pay review body is unlikely given the “number of years it would take to implement something that made any sense”.