Federation of Awarding Bodies chair and vice-chair to step down

Paul Eeles and Terry Fennell, the chair and vice-chair of the Federation of Awarding Bodies respectively, are to step down from the positions at the end of the year.

The pair have each served two terms – seven years – on the board and will officially leave the membership organisation at their next annual general meeting in December.

A statement from the FAB board said they will put in place a succession plan over the summer and a further announcement will be made in the autumn.

Eeles (pictured above left), who is also the chief executive of the Skills and Education Group, joined FAB as a board member in 2013 and became chair in 2016.

He said it has been an “honour and a privilege to serve on the FAB board for over seven years and to have been its chair for just over four years”.

“When I was elected chair my overriding goal was to ensure FAB was sat around the right tables with agencies and government on behalf of its members, representing the collective voice of the awarding sector on the issues which impact directly on members and the learners and stakeholders they serve,” he continued.

“Together as a board, staff and membership we have achieved that. I am proud of our achievements. This now feels the right time with a strong staff and board to step down.” 

Fennell (pictured above right), the chief executive of awarding body FDQ Ltd, also joined the FAB board seven years ago and was elected vice-chair in 2016.

“I have really enjoyed serving as vice chair at FAB and I have learnt so much from the various apprenticeship and technical interest groups that I was fortunate to oversee these past few years,” he said.

“It has also been a pleasure supporting Paul as chair and you could not find a more committed and passionate advocate to represent the interests of the awarding sector. I wish Tom, the hardworking federation team, the board and indeed all FAB members the very best in the future”

Tom Bewick, chief executive of FAB, said: “On behalf of the whole staff team, past and present, I would like to say how fortunate the organisation has been to have been led and supported at board level by Paul and Terry, who both care so much about the future of UK awarding, apprenticeships and assessment.

“When I came into post just over two years ago, they communicated a very clear vision of where FAB needed to develop. It is a great credit to them both and their leadership skills that they retire from the board having created a far more innovative and influential industry body.” 

ESFA to force ‘significant’ reductions to FE subcontracting by 2022/23

The Education and Skills Funding Agency has confirmed it will apply a cap on the volume of subcontracting as it moves to “significantly” reduce the practice in further education.

A new externally assessed “standard”, which all providers will need to meet in order to subcontract ESFA funds, is also to be introduced to tackle “poor oversight and fraud”.

Other areas that will change include “acting on the use” of brokers to “sell on” provision to subcontractors, and placing “restrictions and limits” on types of subcontracting that have been identified as higher risk.

Providers will also need to gain “prior approval” for geographically distant 16 to 18 study programme provision from 2021/22.

The agency made the announcements today as part of their response to their subcontracting consultation that was run earlier this year.

ESFA chief executive Eileen Milner previously wrote to the sector highlighting concerns about the “continued rise” in cases of fraud linked to subcontracting arrangements managed by agency.

She said today: “I have been clear that the current arrangements in place for subcontracting were not going far enough from an agency, accounting officer and sector perspective.  

“We must all be satisfied that public money is being managed properly.

“The changes ESFA is introducing will strengthen oversight by lead providers and give confidence that the limited subcontracting that is necessary in the future evidentially and defensibly meets the needs of specific learners or employer, is of good quality and is managed responsibly by the lead provider.

“We will work with the sector to test and implement these changes gradually to ensure that the outcome for learners is central.”   

The cap value has not yet been decided. The ESFA will “take forward work” this academic year to establish the “right threshold for that cap and timescales for a staged reduction”.

The consultation had said it should be a cap of 25 per cent of a provider’s ESFA post-16 income in 2021/22, and further reducing that percentage to 17.5 per cent in 2022/23 and to 10 per cent in 2023/24. But most respondents disagreed with the proposal.

Going forward, all providers’ corporations and boards who choose to subcontract will also have to publish a “curriculum rationale for their limited subcontracted activity”.

FE Week analysis of ESFA data shows that subcontracting accounted for £650 million in government funding for adults in 2018/19, and the practice fully or partially funded 25,230 students aged 16 to 19 at 587 subcontractors.

The ESFA’s consultation received over 400 responses. The agency said the “majority” of its ten proposals were supported.

These included the “requirement for a clear curriculum rationale; control of the volume and value of provision delivered by subcontractors; simplifying third party arrangements with specialist providers such as sport; rationalising funding rules; requiring the publication of fees and charges across all funding streams; and the introduction of an externally validated standard”.

The implementation of these reforms will begin in time for the next academic year, but they will be phased in over the next three years until 2022/23 to “allow for a period of adjustment”. 

A single subcontracting “reference guide” that will contain the rules that apply across all provision types will be published by 2021/22.

The ESFA said it will be setting out the detail of these reforms “later this year”.

Association of Employment and Learning Providers chief executive Mark Dawe said: “The foremost priority in the regulation of subcontracting should be maximising the amount of public money that reaches frontline delivery of learning and our initial response to today’s announcement is that the ESFA is taking a measured approach towards achieving this aim.

“It seems to largely mirror the changes we saw with apprenticeships when the levy was introduced.”

He added that the AELP “especially welcomes” the renewed commitment to crack down on brokerage, but “we remain perplexed as to why the agency doesn’t join the combined authorities in imposing an outright 20 per cent cap on management fees.

“We still hear too many cases of subcontractors being held to ransom over the level of fess in order to retain business.

“At least we will see a return to greater transparency with the requirement on providers to publish the details of their subcontracting arrangements.”

PM promises ‘every young person’ the ‘chance of an apprenticeship or an in-work placement’

The prime minister has promised to offer an “opportunity guarantee” that will give “every young person the chance of an apprenticeship or an in-work placement” to boost the economy after Covid-19.

But details of how this policy would actually work or how much it would cost are not yet known.

Boris Johnson delivered a speech at Dudley College this morning to launch a “new deal” which accelerates £5 billion on infrastructure projects across the country to “build build build”.

He said that for a “century we have failed to invest enough in further education and give young people the practical training and further education they need” before reiterating that the government will invest £1.5 billion for refurbishments to “dilapidated” college buildings, starting this year.

The prime minister then said: “We will also offer an opportunity guarantee, so that every young person has the chance of an apprenticeship or an in-work placement so that they maintain the skills and confidence they need to find the job that is right for them.”

Johnson has previously said he thinks that every young person should be given an “apprenticeship guarantee”.

Responding to today’s speech, Association of Employment and Learning Providers chief executive Mark Dawe said: “The fact that the prime minister sees work placements as a key part of a new opportunity guarantee for young people is an important step forward and we recently submitted at the government’s request what has been holding back the highly effective traineeship programme from taking off.

“We believe incentives for SME employers will be needed.”

It was reported by The Sun yesterday that chancellor Rishi Sunak could be about to announce handouts of £3,000 to employers  for each apprentice under the age of 25 they hire.

Dawe said the AELP “does not believe that the floated £3,000 employer incentive is going to cut it”.

“To meet a 50 per cent wage subsidy, the subsidy for a young apprentice in their first year should be around £4,000 and up to £7,500 in second year depending on their age,” he added.

Johnson said today that Sunak will provide an update on his economic recovery strategy next week.

Following today’s speech, the Department for Education said the “guarantee” involves several government departments, and the detail is still being finalised.

They added that the basic premise is that they recognise the substantial risk that some young people who would usually enter the labour market this year will find themselves unemployed.

Number 10 was also approached for comment.

 

Exam boards to investigate claims of ‘bias’ in teacher-assessed grades

Exam boards will be expected to investigate claims from students that schools and colleges have not shown “care or integrity” in stamping out “bias” in teacher-assessed grades.

In updated draft guidance on appeals for exam boards, Ofqual said while they expect such allegations to be rare, it is an “important safeguard” for pupils in this year’s grading arrangements.

A consultation has been launched on new guidance today which sets out the information exam boards must provide schools considering an appeal, and the circumstances an appeal may be allowed because the “wrong data” was used.

 

1. Allegations of ‘bias’ in teacher-assessed grades to be investigated

Ofqual has, again, ruled out allowing individual students to challenge their teacher-assessed grades, as an appeal would have to be undertaken by “someone better placed than the student’s teachers to judge their likely grade if exams had taken place”.

“In the unique circumstances of this summer, we do not believe there is any such person,” Ofqual said.

However, the regulator said students who have concerns about “bias, discrimination or any other factor that suggests that a centre did not behave with care or integrity” when issuing teacher-assessed grades can complain to the school or college.

Where there is “evidence of serious malpractice”, Ofqual says it “may be appropriate to bring those concerns directly to the exam board in the first instance”.

“Where there is evidence, we require exam boards to investigate allegations as potential malpractice or maladministration. We expect such allegations to be rare, but this is an important safeguard for students and their overall confidence in this year’s grading arrangements.”

 

2. Student appeals guide to be published, and helpline set up

As part of the above, Ofqual has also committed to publishing a guide for students that sets out how their grades were calculated this year and the options available if they believe their result was not properly produced.

This will include “expectations about who can support students in understanding both the options available to them if they wish to query their result and how to access those routes”.

Ofqual has said this will be published by the end of July, before results days in August.

Sally Collier, chief regulator for Ofqual, said they are “committed to helping students and their families understand how to access an appeal or make a complaint about bias, discrimination, or another concern.

“We will provide accessible information and have a helpline available to students and their parents or carers to talk about the appeals process and any other questions they may have about their results this summer.”

 

3. No specific appeal route because of ‘significant demographical change’

Ofqual had promised to look into whether allowing an appeal where a school or college could show “significant demographical changes in its cohort to justify changes in how the standardisation process was applied to its students”.

The regulator justified this by analysis that found such circumstances were “exceptional” cases, as the “magnitude of change that would be required to affect calculation of results would need to be great”.

The guidance said such circumstances may include a school or college becoming single-sex, or having put in place an “accelerated learning programme for very able learners other than in year 11 or 13” who are for the first time entering qualifications.

Another case could be where teaching and learning for 2018 or 2019 was “significantly disrupted” due to “one or more extraordinary or momentous incidents or events”.

However – and importantly – Ofqual has said should this be the case, schools and colleges can use the “wrong data” grounds to appeal.

But Ofqual said appeals should not be made on the basis of inspection reports, curriculum choices or mock exams – it must relate to evidence that “something happened” to either the 2020, or an earlier, cohort that “may not be comparable with previous years”.

 

4. So what grounds can schools and colleges appeal on?

Ofqual has already said schools and colleges can appeal only on procedural grounds: the basis that the “wrong date was used to calculate results”, or where there was an administrative error.

The wrong data includes where a school or college has provided incorrected teacher-assessed grades or rank order information, where the exam board has used the incorrect data for its standardisation process, or where the exam board has “introduced an error” into the data.

For appeals based on the school or college making a mistake when submitting information, it will be on the school or college to evidence this.

Ofqual said: “We expect that any mistakes will be quickly found and corrected.”

 

5. Exam boards can provide further info to help centres decide on appeals

Ofqual said that, in “appropriate” cases, exam boards can disclose further information to schools and colleges to help them decide whether to appeal a grade.

The regulator said “sufficient information” would include the centre-assessment grades and rank order, the school’s or college’s historical results and the relevant prior attainment data used by the exam boards for its standardisation.

Exam boards must have arrangements in place to provide this information if requested by schools and colleges.

It’s also up to schools and colleges whether to disclose this information to the student whose grade may be appealed.

Information about teacher-assessed grades and rank orders are not allowed to be shared with pupils or parents amid concerns they “may try to exploit” the system. But the draft guidance states disclosure of such information from exam boards “at this stage will not represent a breach of confidentiality … because it will take place after results have been issued”.

GCSE and A-level autumn series grades to be based only on exams, Ofqual confirms

Student grades in this year’s autumn exam series will be based on their performance in the tests alone, not on any non-exam assessment, Ofqual has confirmed.

The exams regulator has published its decisions following a consultation on the autumn series, which will allow learners who are not happy with their summer calculated grades to sit an actual exam. 

Ofqual has also confirmed that exam boards must make exams available in all GCSE, AS and A-level subjects. However, exam boards will be allowed to withdraw an exam if there have been no entries by the closing date. 

Exam boards must also issue replacement certificates for the summer results if students request them, and boards must adopt the normal arrangements for reviews of marking and appeals.

The majority of the proposals set out in the consultation document, published in May, have been implemented. AS and A level exams are expected to be held in October, with GCSEs in November, but exact timings are to be confirmed in “due course”.

Ofqual said it had “listened carefully” to responses about what the grades should be based on, including arguments about the role non-exam assessment (NEA) plays in assessing aspects of a subject’s content that cannot be assessed by exam. 

Overall, 46 per cent of respondents agreed with the proposal, while 39 per cent disagreed citing concerns including the “de-motivating” effect on students if work they had completed before school and college closures was disregarded. 

There were also concerns about the possible impact of removing NEA for some students, including those with special educational needs.

Research published today by Ofqual, which appears to underpin its decision, claims there is “little evidence” coursework has any impact on outcomes for students of different socio-economic statuses, or those with special education needs.

This study includes data from six academic years between 2004 and 2017 and, within those years, it focused on specifications in five different subject areas.

“While it would be desirable for the autumn series to include NEA, on balance we believe the issues of manageability and fairness raised with us could further disadvantage some students and that it is not in students’ best interests overall,” Ofqual said.

The only exception would be for art and design qualifications, where a new “task”, which is technically an NEA, would be set.

The Association of School and College leaders has expressed concerns about how schools and colleges will be able to accommodate and manage a full suite of autumn exams alongside bringing all students back in September.

Geoff Barton, ASCL’s general secretary, said: “We had argued for the autumn series to be restricted to A-levels, and GCSE English and maths.

“However, we understand the pressure on the government and Ofqual to provide the option of a full suite of exams in the event that pupils and parents are unhappy with centre-assessed grades in August.

“We would reassure pupils and parents that the process for centre-assessed grades is robust. These qualifications will be every bit as valid as in any other year and will allow young people to progress to the next stage of the lives without hinderance, and without the need to use the autumn series.” 

Ofqual said it understood the “logistical challenges” schools and colleges will face this autumn, and will continue in-sector talks.  

It added that the Department for Education is exploring ways to minimise additional burdens on schools and colleges.

Profile: Sarah Stannard

FE Week meets a principal with a history of bravely sailing against prevailing winds. Is her ship about to come in?

Sarah Stannard learnt resilience young. The principal of City College Southampton, who cut her teeth in the business world before moving into leadership in FE, was brought up by a Navy man and strikes you as the sort of person you’d want to be stuck with on a boat in stormy weather.

Her father’s job meant she, her mother and sister moved around often when she was young, from Hampshire to Wales and Kent, attending comprehensives, grammar schools, sixth forms and sixth form colleges. It had two impacts on her outlook: First, experiencing different kinds of schools meant Stannard, who was herself academically capable, realised “an academic education is not right for everyone” and being helped towards a fulfilling career trumps top exam results. Second, she became a roll-your-sleeves-up kind of person. “What it taught me was to be pretty resilient. I reflect now that I’m not too bothered by change. We just got on with it.”

It’s a trait Stannard has needed, as any education leader does. But she has particularly interesting circumstances for leadership: last year, the Education and Skills Funding Agency told her that City College Southampton, which she has led since 2013, received the highest subsidy for free school meal students in England because of the very high level of disadvantaged learners on roll. The college is also in the top 10 per cent for students who arrive needing to retake English and math GCSEs. Meanwhile the challenges of recruiting to coastal colleges are well-documented, and parts of Southampton rank among the most deprived in the country.

Actually, FE does an OK job of thinking into the future

For her first principalship and second FE college, it was already a tough outlook. Yet in the past six years, Stannard has also weathered two ‘requires improvement’ Ofsted grades (with reasonable progress noted at last year’s monitoring inspection) and put forward proposals for two college mergers, both which were rejected by the Department for Education. She’s now onto her third merger, and is staunchly hopeful. When I ask her future plans for the college, she replies determinedly: “To get this done.”

The younger Stannard completed her secondary education at grammar school and won a place to read history at King’s College London. The first person in her family to attend university, she was determined to build a solid career and landed a graduate scheme place with Abbott Laboratories, a US pharmaceutical company with a Kent branch. Later she moved to another huge global US company, Kraft Foods, which specialised in coffee, chocolate and cheese, working with brands such as Kenco from their Cheltenham branch.

The company’s investment in staff development has stayed with her. “I’ve got files from the training courses sitting in my cupboard and I still go back to them occasionally, as they were really high quality!” Kraft was also the first place Stannard encountered apprentices, who were trained at nearby Banbury College. “I got to see apprentices from the employer’s point of view, and I could see it was a great way of bringing them into the company. It was about people coming in at entry level and developing them.” Stannard was placed on Kraft’s Top Talent scheme, but it wasn’t quite compelling enough. It would soon become clear that a passion for developing others would eventually take Stannard out of the business world altogether.

She continued as a senior management consultant for PricewaterhouseCoopers and then IBM until 2006 and simultaneously volunteered for 15 years with the Tall Ships Youth Trust. As watch leader, she was responsible for 16- to 24-year-olds for a fortnight at sea, many of whom were from disadvantaged backgrounds and had never set foot abroad. “It was brilliant. I think I learned a huge amount about how quickly people can change. You saw people blossom in two weeks. I also learned a lot about leading a team. People ask me, what was your most important people management learning moment? For me it was that.” Stannard seems to have gained nerves of steel, as she’s sailed in the famous Bay of Biscay race amid force 10 gales.

Her first role in FE was a very senior job, as vice principal responsible for business development at Chichester College. During almost seven years there, she observed that the world of business and FE are not so unaligned. “People often say to me, ‘it must have been a huge shock moving over from business’. But my standard answer is actually it wasn’t. They’re both big, complex organisations employing many people.” She also thinks FE beats itself up too much about not having a long-term strategy. “Actually business operates in some ways even more on a day-to-day basis. The meetings are all about what this quarter’s results are like. I think actually FE does an OK job of thinking into the future.”

However, there was one area that struck Stannard as in need of improvement. As someone with both a career and an employer’s perspective, she felt not enough was being done to really encourage students onto their next steps. Shortly after she joined Southampton, she was invited to the local Education Forum, comprising all the secondary schools, colleges and universities in the area. “I remember being very passionate about the fact that careers at that time was still low on schools’ priority and the Ofsted framework didn’t give much attention to it. Meanwhile, employers were still saying that students weren’t arriving work-ready.”

Stannard told the forum that “although nationally no one is very interested in this, we can do something in Southampton if we want to”. She has been vindicated since, with Ofsted announcing careers guidance in schools wasn’t working just months later and the DfE introducing a full careers strategy by 2017. “We certainly started focusing on it before it hit the national agenda. 

But the real challenge was more unexpected. The college, which was briefly graded ‘good’ in 2011, got graded ‘requires improvement’ in 2017 and again in 2018. It will have placed some pressure on Stannard and her team, who were nevertheless praised for delivering “good-quality, impartial careers advice”. There have been improved indicators since: the percentage of students completing their level 2 programmes has shot up from 83 per cent three years ago to 92 per cent in 2019, with similar rises for level 3 qualifications. But achievement rates in a minority of courses remain too low and particularly declined last year for marine apprenticeships, says Ofsted. One wonders how much the inspection outcome reflects a highly disadvantaged student body, but Stannard doesn’t complain about the ratings, except to note that “there is a selective process going on about who goes where” in terms of post-16 education in the area. “We are the most inclusive college in the city.”

I didn’t foresee that it would be so difficult

She is, however, evidently frustrated by the long delay to a goal she’s held since 2013 (and officially recommended in an area review not long afterwards), which is to merge the college in order to secure its finances and future. FE Week readers will know her first proposal for a merger, with Southampton Solent University, fell through in 2018, while a plan to join Eastleigh College collapsed at the eleventh hour in 2019 after an application for emergency funding was rejected by the ESFA. Third time tantalisingly lucky: the college is set to join Itchen Sixth Form College in August 2021, delayed only by the coronavirus. In the meantime, the college got about £2.5 million in emergency funding last year and warned it would soon run out of cash. I ask Stannard whether she expected such challenges when she joined.

“I knew when I joined that it didn’t have very much money. But I didn’t know funding was going to decline as much across the sector in the way it did.” In Southampton, the failure to merge has been all the more frustrating because there are three colleges in the city and three more on the outskirts – too many. “I didn’t foresee that it would be so difficult.”

“No, I’ve never wanted to throw the towel in,” she responds to my inevitable question. “I do ask myself the question sometimes. The frustration has been not having control over it.

“But the community in this city really deserves good education. It doesn’t matter what the name over our door is. That sense of doing the right thing by the community is what’s kept me and our staff going.”

Stannard has needed that resilience. Let’s hope the ESFA finally lets her sail this ship into harbour.

Official figures reveal 85% fall in apprenticeship vacancies

The number of vacancies on the government’s Find An Apprenticeship website plummeted by more than 80 per cent in each of the first two full months of lockdown.

“Repurposed” data published by the Department for Education on Thursday showed apprenticeship vacancy figures for the first time since they were last published in 2017.

The figures reveal that in April and May 2020, there were 2,020 and 1,850 employer vacancies for apprentices, which compares to 10,400 and 12,580 in the same months of 2019 respectively.

It comes as the government works on policy to encourage businesses to take on more apprentices as part of their Covid-19 recovery plan.

Prime minister Boris Johnson sent a letter to Commons Liaison Committee chair Sir Bernard Jenkin last week and stated: “We are looking at how we can support employers, especially small businesses, to take on new apprenticeships this year and will provide detail in due course.”

Director of apprenticeships in the Education and Skills Funding Agency, Peter Mucklow, said on Friday that discussions were underway with Treasury about what “incentives” they can give employers to take on more apprentices.

Johnson has previously said he thinks all young people should be given an apprenticeship “guarantee” following the pandemic.

It was reported by The Sun last night that chancellor Rishi Sunak could handout £3,000 to employers  for each apprentice under the age of 25 they hire.

A number of high-profile businesses have announced large-scale apprentice recruitment drives in recent weeks.

British multinational defence, security, and aerospace company BAE Systems, for example, has announced they are continuing with plans to recruit 800 apprentices – a “record” number – this year.

Yesterday, the UK’s largest independent travel agency, Hays Travel, announced plans to take on 700 apprentices nationwide.

Commentary published alongside the DfE’s vacancy data said the figures from Find An Apprenticeship represent “only a subset of the total number of vacancies available across the marketplace as a whole, as many apprenticeships are not advertised through this website”.

The department did used to publish data on apprenticeship vacancies but this stopped back in 2017.

They have begun publishing it again as part of their efforts to “repurpose our statistics and commentary to make them more relevant to the current pandemic”.

A spokesperson said as part of this, the DfE has been considering other data and intelligence that they may want to consider releasing – for example “we’ve started providing the very latest month of starts that we don’t usually do given high levels of underreporting when first submitted by providers”.

“We’re only doing this temporarily for transparency purposes and to evidence whether there is continuing activity in the apprenticeship programme in a more timely manner,” they added.

“Similarly we have decided to publish apprenticeship vacancy data at this point as we believe users will find this a useful piece of information currently, especially if in future months we start seeing signs of a recovery, which an increase in vacancies may indicate – this doesn’t mean we will return to publishing vacancies data as before, but during the affected period we believe it provides additional valuable insights for our users.”

 

Government to ‘fast track’ £200m of £1.5bn capital budget to refurbish colleges

The government is to make £200 million of its £1.5 billion college capital funding pot available from this September – a year earlier than planned, prime minister Boris Johnson has announced tonight.

The cash for repairs and upgrades to college buildings and estates was promised by chancellor Rishi Sunak in his March budget but the five-year project was supposed to start in 2021.

Johnson has now said that £200 million of the investment will be accessible this year.

It comes alongside a ten-year “rebuilding programme” for schools also announced by the prime minister tonight, which includes £560 million being made available to them this year for refurbishment.

A government spokesperson said this “fast tracked” activity will “further support the government’s wider plans to protect jobs and incomes and drive forward the country’s economic recovery from the [Covid-19] pandemic”.

Johnson said: “As we bounce back from the pandemic, it’s important we lay the foundations for a country where everyone has the opportunity to succeed, with our younger generations front and centre of this mission.  

“This major new investment will make sure our schools and colleges are fit for the future, with better facilities and brand new buildings so that every child gets a world-class education.”

David Hughes, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said this is a “good first step by the government to support colleges to be central players in the country’s recovery”.

“For colleges, they will be desperate to have the resources quickly, so I hope this is delivered through a simple formula which grants the money with minimum bureaucracy.

“That way, colleges can invest in the repairs, adaptations, equipment and crucially the digital infrastructure they need to provide a great learning experience from September.”

The government previously told FE Week that the capital fund will require colleges to match the funding with 21 per cent – so for every £1 invested by the government, “we are expecting an average 21p college contribution”.

Hughes continued: “The overall package of £1.5 billion committed in the March Budget will only be sufficient if colleges are financially healthy enough to secure commercial borrowing to extend the fund, and that is in doubt unless further revenue investment comes very soon.  

“Overall this is a very welcome announcement which will show college leaders that they are viewed by the government as a vital part of the recovery effort. They want to be, and can be with the right investment.”

Education secretary Gavin Williamson said: “Replacing and upgrading poor condition school and college buildings with modern, energy efficient designs will give our students and teachers the environment they deserve, and support them to maximise their potential.

“As we look forward to this September and all children returning to school, we can be assured that for years to come this country’s education system will drive opportunity and prosperity for all.”

And minister for apprenticeships and skills Gillian Keegan said: “This investment is fantastic news for colleges and means they can kick start work to refurbish their facilities and equipment from as early as this September.

“The FE sector will play a pivotal role in our economic recovery post-Covid-19, ensuring more people can gain the skills they need to get ahead. This is just the start of work to transform the FE sector including making sure students have access to high quality, fit for purpose facilities and are great places to learn.”

She added that the Department for Education will set out further details of how the £200 million college capital funding will be allocated “in due course”.

 

Exams regulator to lose their FE lead

The head of Ofqual’s vocational and technical qualifications (VTQs) department is stepping down.

Phil Beach, who is currently leading the regulator’s Covid-19 response across further education providers and students for cancelled exams, will leave to become chief executive of Energy and Utility Skills – a membership body for the utility workforce – on September 21.

Ofqual said arrangements to secure his successor are being made.

Beach joined the regulator in January 2015 as the director of strategic relationships for general qualifications before becoming its executive director for vocational and technical qualifications.

“We are delighted for Phil, and wish him every success with this new opportunity,” a spokesperson for Ofqual told FE Week, adding that he has “done much to shape and improve the quality of the complex VTQs landscape”.

“Under his direction the regulation of VTQs has strengthened, as has Ofqual’s regulation of the awarding organisation market. This has, of course, been most noticeable over the recent months as he has steered us through the arrangements for awarding VTQs this spring and summer.

“Phil will continue to lead this work until he moves to his new role in September, over which period arrangements to secure his successor will progress.”

Before he joined Ofqual, Beach served in the Royal Air Force. He received an MBE in the 2000 New Year’s Honours List, a Queen’s Commendation in 2004 and a CBE in 2014.

Beach said he was “delighted to be joining Energy and Utility Skills at such an important time for the organisation and the sector”.