A new chapter in education protection!

The value of an insurance broker

When it comes to protecting your college’s assets and ensuring continuity of operations, having suitable insurance coverage is crucial. By using our experienced insurance brokers to procure insurance, we can provide specialist and professional advice, a range of risk management solutions from the insurance market, guide your organisation through volatile market conditions and help manage claims.

As one of the leading providers of insurance broking and risk management services, Gallagher offers professional advice tailored to suit the specific needs of your college. We understand the unique risks and challenges faced by further education colleges and can provide specialist guidance on suitable insurance solutions.

A broader offering for comprehensive protection

One of the key advantages of Gallagher is the broad range of insurance solutions and specialisms we provide. Gallagher is one of the largest insurance brokers in the world with over 50 offices in the UK, and a presence in over 130 countries. This allows us to utilise the experience and resources globally to be able to support you college at a local level. Gallagher can offer specialist cover of a range of complex insurance offerings such as:

  • Cyber Insurance – we have a team of specialists who understand the unique risks faced by colleges and can provide tailored coverage against data breaches, ransomware attacks and other cyber threats.
  • Risk Management – we go beyond just insurance coverage and offer comprehensive risk management services, our team works closely with colleges to identify potential risks, develop strategies to mitigate these and implement effective risk management programmes.
  • Full Revenue Cover (Business Interruption)

One of the key advantages of Gallagher is that we can arrange innovative approaches to insuring your specific and complex risks, which provides our clients a diverse selection of insurance products and services.

By leveraging their industry expertise and market relationships, we can help colleges navigate the insurance market and secure coverage that meets their specific needs.

In addition, we regularly advise our clients on developing trends that we may see in the education sector which could be relevant. We continuously review new and emerging risks throughout the year and advise on potential exposures to you and suitable risk control measures.

Support on claims and reducing costs

As a broker, we know we can add value in supporting you in an emergency. Our specialist experience in the education sector has meant that we have handled a range of incidents in this sector.

We provide a full claims service to support you through the entirety of any claim you may have, including:

  • 24 hours claims service
  • Appointment of Loss Assessors to help manage any property claims over £5000
  • Specialist fraudulent claims service to better protect your interest.

This claims service works in conjunction with our Risk Management offering and the objective of this is to improve your risk, manage any potential exposures, control premium spends and effectively help to prevent or mitigate claims occurring from the outset.

Familiar service proposition, but with more support

Following the rebrand to Gallagher, FE Protect’s clients continue to be supported with insurance and risk management services by the existing team that know and understand your college, whilst additionally benefiting from Gallagher’s wealth of industry knowledge and insight from its wider team.

To find out more about how Gallagher can support your college visit https://www.ajg.com/uk/education/education-insurance/ or call Karen Banks on 07804042951.

Arthur J. Gallagher Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered Office: Spectrum Building, 55 Blythswood Street, Glasgow, G2 7AT. Registered in Scotland. Company Number: SC108909.

First London university to get top Ofsted marks

A university in London has secured the highest possible Ofsted rating across the board in its first full inspection.

Brunel University received a glowing report from the watchdog today which found apprentices are taught “highly sought after” skills in healthcare and digital technologies sectors.

There are 78 apprentices studying level 5 to 7 degree apprenticeships who feel “privileged and proud to study at the university” which employs “exceptional lecturers who are experts in their field”.

The university began delivering apprenticeships in 2020. Ofsted recognised how leaders faced “significant challenges” in their first year of offering the skills programmes due to Covid-19-related disruptions mainly in the healthcare sector.

In their first cohort of a small number of nursing associate apprentices, only a few remained on their course and achieved. But leaders took “prompt action and rapidly improved their employer engagement and student support interventions to make sure that apprentices received effective and timely support both on their course and in the workplace”.

Retention of apprentices and their achievement rates then improved “significantly” from the previous year and the “vast majority of apprentices stay on their programmes and are making excellent progress”.

Brunel becomes the only university in London and the south of England to achieve ‘outstanding’, and one of only four across the country to receive the highest Ofsted inspection grade.

Professor Andrew Jones, Brunel’s vice-chancellor and president, said Ofsted’s report was an “impressive independent assessment of the excellent work by our teaching and support teams, and of the amazing achievements of our apprentices”.

“It demonstrates our commitment to the needs of business, industry and the professions by delivering the highest quality of education and training to meet their skills needs,” he added.

Inspectors found that “staff provide effective support to apprentices with additional learning needs throughout their training” while apprentices display “exemplary” professional behaviours throughout their training and in the workplace.

The inspectors added that employers make sure that apprentices have access to high-quality on-the-job training and support in the workplace, and that staff work efficiently with employers to ensure that apprentices make exceptional progress.

The vast majority of apprentices sustain their employment and gain additional responsibilities or promotion at the end of their apprenticeships.

Raj Kakaiya, head of apprenticeships at Brunel, said: “Our apprenticeships aim to address some of the biggest skills gaps in the UK, such as those outlined in the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan. We know that our apprentices are having precisely the impact we’ve readied them for, developing clinical services, improving patient outcomes, enriching the NHS’s data analytics capability and even making airport operations more efficient.

“We deliver purpose-driven apprenticeships, and our apprentices benefit from transformational career development.”

East Sussex sixth form college upgraded to ‘outstanding’

A sixth form college in East Sussex that teaches over 2,250 students has been upgraded to ‘outstanding’ following its latest Ofsted inspection.

Bexhill College was awarded grade one marks across all areas apart from its adult learning programme, which was deemed ‘good’.

Inspectors examined Bexhill between January 23 and 26 and found “highly motivated” students and a “consistently high” standard of teaching across the college.

The sixth form college had 2,200 students aged 16 to 19 enrolled at the time of inspection studying level 3 programmes as well as 59 adult students and 16 students in receipt of high-needs funding.

The ‘outstanding’ award is an improvement from its last full inspection in 2010, where it was graded ‘good’. The college since had two short inspections in 2015 and 2019, both of which were grade two.

Principal Karen Hucker said: “To be recognised as ‘outstanding’ is an extremely significant achievement and the result of years of hard work, determination, and dedication from all staff.

“I am absolutely delighted for all the students, staff, and everyone connected with the college.”

During the full inspection, inspectors praised leaders’ use of their “detailed” knowledge of the provision to provide development activities that improved teaching practice, which was shared amongst colleagues.

For example, science teachers shared their knowledge of using online polling software to gauge students’ opinions with colleagues in the English department. 

“As a result, the standard of teaching is consistently high across the college,” the report said.

The quality of education was also found to be “consistently high” after the watchdog found leaders’ quick solutions to issues at the college.

Leaders had recognised that too many students were not completing their programme successfully and executed “sensible actions” to retain more students. 

Hucker added: “This report is recognition of that and is something that not just the college, but the town of Bexhill and the surrounding area can be proud of.”

“We strive to provide the highest standard of education possible in a college that welcomes, encourages, and embraces its students,” she said.

The report also found that the college makes a strong contribution to meeting skills needs through liaising with employers and integrating stakeholders into the curriculum.

SEND college considers closure after ‘wrong’ Ofsted result

A SEND college is facing potential closure after a second ‘inadequate’ grade from Ofsted, as leaders accuse the watchdog of unprofessional conduct and a “wrong” judgment.

Leighton Education Project is a small college in Kentish Town, London that teaches less than 20 young people with learning disabilities run by charity Elfrida Rathbone Camden.

The college was downgraded from ‘good’ to ‘inadequate’ in June 2022 due to concerns about safeguarding, medical training of staff and its curriculum.

Following a re-inspection in November 2023, the education watchdog said students were still “making slow progress” because the curriculum did not meet their individual needs.

In a statement understood to have been sent to parents and stakeholders, Elfrida Rathbone Camden said Leighton Education Project, which has been teaching young adults with special educational needs like autism since 1983,  was “very disappointed” and is considering whether to close in July this year.

The statement said: “What this second inadequate means for the college and our learners is not yet clear. There will be implications for our funding and the number of learners that will be placed at the college in future.”

This adds to existing “financial pressures” stemming from the college’s falling student numbers.

As a result, a final decision on whether to continue operating in the next school year will be made by March.

Management complained that the college should have been graded as ‘requires improvement’ after “working tirelessly” to improve the curriculum after the last inspection.

In a message shared with FE Week, management said: “We submitted a formal complaint to Ofsted explaining why we felt our grading was wrong and also detailing unprofessional conduct by the inspection team during the inspection.”

However, after an internal investigation, the education watchdog rejected the complaint and published its inspection report today.

FE Week understands that the college felt it did not have enough time to improve its curriculum between the June 2022 inspection and November this year.

In 2023, Ofsted inspectors attended the college at three points for monitoring visits and a final re-inspection.

Reports show that the watchdog recognised that the college had resolved the safeguarding issue – which partly related to having a secure entrance – and had “worked hard” to improve the quality of its curriculum.

But inspectors found that despite the college drafting in “external expertise” to advise on teaching improvements, tutors failed to assess students’ prior knowledge so could not plan a sufficiently “ambitious” core curriculum.

The inspection report said: “They assess all learners on the same topics regardless of their prior learning and how many years they have been at the college.

“Consequently, tutors do not have a good enough overview of what learners know and can do at the start of programmes.”

Other concerns included tutors not being “sufficiently qualified” and not thoroughly checking whether students understand what they are learning.

Cyber attacks: Exam boards told to introduce new security measures

Exams regulator Ofqual has asked exam boards to introduce new security measures, its chief regulator has said. 

It follows police investigations being launched after cyber attacks at three exam boards last summer. 

Sir Ian Bauckham, Ofqual chief regulator, said “clearly examinations cannot be fair if some people get access to secure examination materials beforehand”.

He said it was “critically important” that the sector focused on “maintaining the security of the IT systems that are used to hold and communicate important examination materials”. 

“I know that all of you, if you’re running schools or trusts or colleges, will be very focused on the security of your own systems as well as the resilience of those systems under pressure.

“We’ve asked exam boards to introduce additional security measures this year, including multi-factor authentication for accessing exam sites to make sure that those are only accessed by people who are authorised to access them.”

He recognised this could be “a bit annoying” when you’re “working under pressure and add a few minutes of extra time”. 

But he added: “I think all of us would understand that is an important process to go through to ensure that these materials are secure”. 

Police investigating the cyber attack at AQA said there were “no further positive lines of enquiry” to pursue. 

A separate investigation by Cambridgeshire Police into cyber attacks at exam boards OCR and Pearson is continuing. A 16-year-old boy was arrested on suspicion of theft, fraud and computer misuse. He has been released under investigation.

‘Rigorous checks’ on digital exams

All exam boards have set timelines to move towards on-screen examinations. But AQA announced this week that it has delayed its plans to “get this right and maintain public confidence in our exam system”. Ofqual has to approve the plans. 

Bauckham said the regulator will make “rigorous checks” to make sure they are fair and the stability to make sure “systems are not going to be at risk of falling over and messing up examinations”. 

He pointed to the Oxford University admissions test, where candidates were unable to sit entrance tests properly after problems with the online assessment, The Times reported.

“Lo and behold schools were beset with freezing screens and impossible log-ins and refusals to move onto the next question,” Bauckham said. “In fact the whole thing had to be abandoned.” 

“We cannot afford either a large-scale failure nor can we afford to have innovations in assessment which accidentally introduce unfairness. 

He added: “You only get one chance when you’re 16 taking your GCSEs. Failures in IT systems are not going to be acceptable as an excuse for your child’s GCSEs being messed up.” 

Asked by Schools Week how long the approval process would take, Bauckham said they “can’t be certain” at the moment but they are going to “make absolutely sure that we don’t take any risks with any of those areas.” 

Sir Martyn Oliver’s first big Ofsted speech: in full

Ofsted chief Sir Martyn Oliver has given his first keynote speech today, launching a new Big Listen consultation and declaring he wants to turn the watchdog into a “world-class inspectorate”.

In his speech to ASCL conference in Liverpool, Oliver added the watchdog “understands” the current difficulties facing school and college leaders, saying he will “do more to recognise the challenging circumstances you face”.

Sir Martyn Oliver’s first Ofsted speech: in full

Hello! Thank you for that welcome.

Thank you for the invitation, and for the many constructive meetings I’ve had with ASCL colleagues in my first couple of months.

I met with Geoff, thanks Geoff, on my fourth day in post, and I’m looking forward to working with Pepe when you take on the mantle next month.

I’m delighted to be here, speaking to you, the leaders of this country’s great schools and colleges.

I feel very comfortable here with you, because we share so many of the same experiences.

I’ve been a teacher; a head; a multi-academy trust leader; and a member of ASCL for nearly two decades before I took on this new role.

And now I stand in front of you for the first time as His Majesty’s Chief Inspector at Ofsted.

I lead an organisation that is, at every level, a reflection of the sectors we inspect and regulate. The teams I now lead are drawn from schools, from further education, from early years, from social care. I have colleagues inspecting the training of military recruits who have served time in the armed forces. I have others inspecting prison education who have worked (I said ‘worked’!) in prisons.

That experience and insight is so important. So important. It’s what gives us credibility. Credibility with you. And credibility when we talk to those in power.

And it’s what gives us the right to inform parents about the services their children are getting.

Because that’s the other side of the coin: we are of the system, but we exist – as you exist – for children, for learners and, of course, for parents and carers.

Challenges

Ours is – or it really should be – a joint enterprise. We talk about raising standards and improving lives – but in truth, our role is to help you do that.

Ofsted does not educate children. You do.

You’re the ones out there every day, educating, inspiring, and shaping the lives of children and learners. I promise you that I’ll never forget that.

I worked in schools for 29 years. Many of them were schools in very difficult situations which needed help.

These schools were often described as being in “challenging circumstances.”

But that phrase begs the question of what circumstances other schools are facing.

I don’t think anyone working in our sector would say their circumstances aren’t “challenging.”

After all, we’re all struggling to various degrees:

  • with the legacies of COVID
  • with cost-of living difficulties
  • with the intertwined problems of attendance and behaviour
  • with increasing demand for mental health and Special Educational Needs and Disabilities services
  • And with a stubborn and stark gap in the performance of disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged children

And of course, looking at other areas we inspect and regulate, we see rising demand for childcare, for alternative provision, for support services and for safe and nurturing children’s homes.

It’s hard to see what you call that other than “challenging.”

But, whilst these are real challenges, there are also reasons to be optimistic. Ours is a great and noble profession full of people, like you, who care deeply about children. Passionate professionals who want the best and can see the impact on individuals when we, as a system, cannot deliver this, for whatever reasons. This makes it difficult. I understand that. But I also understand that the best of you take on your leadership roles not because it is easy, but because it is hard. You want to make a difference, especially to those who are most disadvantaged and vulnerable, and so do I.

So, I want to reassure you that I get it. And that Ofsted gets it.

Why I joined Ofsted

It’s that challenge that brought me to this job. I didn’t apply for it to maintain “business as usual.” I want to meet these challenging times head-on and I want to improve and change the way Ofsted goes about its work.

My ambition is for Ofsted to be a modern, world-class inspectorate and regulator – fit for purpose and also trusted by parents, by children and by you, the sectors we work with. I will need your help in doing this.

I want us to be the best, because children deserve the best.

And because we share the highest expectations for all children – especially the most disadvantaged. They deserve that from us.

I want us all to challenge the so-called soft bigotry of low expectations wherever we find them. Low expectations are pernicious, they are malignant, and they are just plain wrong.

We want to see high standards for all children, and positive outcomes for all children. This is how we start to tackle disadvantage as a society, by opening new doors, creating new opportunities and better life chances.

That’s why, we will of course continue to call out providers when they aren’t meeting the needs of children and parents. Children only get one childhood. None of us want to see their potential limited because of where they were born – or their future mapped out based on their background.

But that doesn’t mean that we can ignore context. I know we can do more to recognise the challenging circumstances you face. To look at the bigger picture and the context in which you’re working.

We can be better at focusing on the things you are and should be doing. The areas where you can add value and make a difference.

But no single school can do it all. I know you all want to do everything you can for the children and communities you serve, but you cannot do it alone. And we don’t expect you to.

And I know only too well that being a teacher, or a lecturer in a college, is a difficult enough job on its own. And so is being a social worker, or an educational psychologist, or any of the other roles in our sector. We shouldn’t expect teachers to try to combine these roles – it just isn’t fair to them, and it isn’t fair to children and learners.

So, I want Ofsted to be better at understanding the decisions you make, in the context you are working in. Understanding why you made those decisions and the difference that they made for your children.

And when we find problems that you can’t control, I want us to do more to follow the thread and hold the right people to account.

Ofsted’s position

Because Ofsted has a unique position overseeing almost all of the services that affect a child’s life, especially a most vulnerable or disadvantaged child:

  • their childminder or nursery
  • if they need help from social services
  • their primary and secondary school
  • if they go on to a college or an apprenticeship
  • if they access SEND support
  • if they’re referred to alternative or specialist provision
  • if they need help from mental health services

And of course, we inspect their local authority, and report to the government and parliament along the way.

So, we have the ability to pull the threads across services and follow where they lead, and I want us to do it more. Because we know that good education and care isn’t the work of one institution – it’s down to all the influences on a young life.

And so, seeing that bigger picture is vital. It’s one of my biggest priorities for Ofsted over the next 5 years.

It means we can see how a child moves between these services, or if they fall through the gaps.

It means we can better understand the difficult decisions you make, particularly where your options are restricted.

And it means we can draw policy makers’ attention to significant gaps, postcode lotteries, where services are not joined up, and where things just aren’t good enough.

Ofsted holds a unique position, and we use it to provide these insights and help to link the whole system together.

Disadvantaged and most vulnerable children

Because I want Ofsted to be a champion for children. Helping you to attain high standards, and improvement through the dissemination of best practice.

And I want us to do that for all children. Especially the most disadvantaged and vulnerable. That’s my other big priority.

We want the right opportunities and the best chances for every child from South Shields to Southampton, from Canterbury to Carlisle, and from Lands End to Lowestoft.

We don’t want disadvantage or vulnerability to be a barrier. Because if you get it right for the most disadvantaged, you get it right for everyone.

Ofsted has a crucial role to play in making sure that happens, and pointing out when it doesn’t.

My first two months

So I have set out a path for Ofsted. And I have set out two big priorities for my tenure. To fully utilise our position, and make the most of our insights. And to make sure our focus is always on the most disadvantaged and vulnerable.

These are big ambitions, and not things that can be achieved overnight. But I hope the steps I’ve taken in my first two months show you that I’m serious.

Serious about Ofsted doing better. Serious about making a difference. And serious about working with the sector to make sure all children have the best possible education, care, and life chances.

On my very first day I announced three things:

  1. an immediate package of training for inspectors on mental health awareness
  2. a full response to the Coroner’s inquest into the tragic death of Ruth Perry
  3. a Big Listen exercise to hear from everyone we work with and for

And I have delivered on those three things.

  1. Every lead inspector has already completed the training package, with support from Mental Health First Aid England. And every inspector used will have completed it by the end of this month.
  • We have published our full response to the Coroner following her inquest into Ruth’s death. We accepted her findings and responded to every single recommendation. Ruth’s death was a tragedy and I am determined to do everything I can to prevent such tragedies happening in the future. It should never happen again, and no one should feel as Ruth did.
  • And today we are formally launching our Big Listen.

Other activity

As well as delivering on those three promises:

  • we have introduced a new policy on pausing an inspection
  • we have made clarifications to our handbooks including setting out how leaders can raise concerns during an inspection, who can attend inspection meetings, and the sharing of provisional outcomes
  • we will shortly be publishing our response to the Education Select Committee’s recent report into our work

And another small change that we are working on, is to make changes to our website to show the full range of component grades at a glance, not just the overall effectiveness grade.

This neither promises nor precludes further changes to our gradings, but I hope it shows that we are listening. That we have heard the views of you, the ASCL members. And that we are acting.

You are clear that all the sub-judgements that Ofsted makes about your schools matter and all should be seen. And it should be about much more than just the overall grade.

By showing the full range of judgements, we hope that parents will be better able to compare providers.

Better able to see a more rounded, contextual picture that speaks to what they care about: behaviour and attitudes to learning, quality of education, their child’s personal development and the way the school or college is run.

So, hopefully you can see, that we will always listen to your views and the views of all the sectors we inspect and regulate.

Of course, the views of children and parents must always come first. They are our highest priority, as I know they are yours too.

And I hope that we can bring together the views of professionals with the views of parents to plot an improvement journey that meets everyone’s needs.

Big Listen

And that leads me nicely back to the Big Listen.

The Big Listen is just that, a big, comprehensive effort to listen to everyone we work with and everyone we work for.

And we want to hear from as many people as possible. From parents and from providers. From children and from commissioners. From educators, and from carers. And from representative groups.

We want to hear from those providing services, those commissioning them, those arranging them, those receiving them, and those impacted by them.

We want to hear from ASCL and all the other representative bodies as well as all of you, as individual teachers, practitioners, and leaders.

And we want to hear from everyone working in our other sectors. Everyone in social care, early years, further education, SEND provision, prison education, teacher development, and local authorities.

As well as the professionals we work with, we want to hear from the people we work for – parents, carers and their children.

So, if your work, your children, your decisions, your education, or your care are impacted by what we do, we want to hear from you.

But please, this is just the beginning. The Big Listen is how we will learn the lessons we need to learn. And how we will improve. But it will not end with listening. The Big Listen will be followed by real action. You can already see action being taken, but I know we have more to do.

Improvement

Ofsted is an organisation filled with talented and committed people. People who have come from schools, colleges, nurseries and local authorities. I think they do a crucial job, and in most instances, they do it very, very well.

And I often hear that same feedback from you. I don’t think the minority who just want to see the back of inspection represent the people in this hall. I think the vast majority of leaders agree with accountability and recognise the importance of inspection.

But I know many of you – perhaps most of you – think Ofsted can be better.

And I agree. We can be better. I have big ambitions for the organisation, and for the impact it can have.

And to deliver on that ambition, we need to listen. We need to listen to feedback. To criticism. To ideas for small changes and for big reforms.

So please help us. And please encourage others to as well. Your colleagues and contacts, as well as the parents at your school or college.

We’re casting the net as widely as we can.

We have commissioned two external organisations to undertake surveys and focus groups with parents and professionals on our behalf – presenting us with a fully impartial take on what they hear.

And, we will also gather views directly at the many events and meetings that our staff attend.

And we will conduct an open online consultation, asking questions and inviting comments.

You can find more information here.

As I’ve said, we are also determined to gather a wide range of children’s views – including from children who are in the care of social services. We’ll have more to say about that in a couple of weeks’ time.

We work in their interests, so we will listen to what they have to say too.

Every voice will be heard, and nothing, NOTHING, is off the table.

Rebuilding relationships

So, the Big Listen is about us doing better. But I also want it to mark a new chapter in our relationship with those we inspect and regulate.

I said, when I announced it on my first day, that I wanted a “fresh start.”

I want to earn and rebuild your confidence in Ofsted. And the confidence of parents and children too.

I know you may not like every decision we make, but I hope you’ll see that we’re doing everything we can, within our constraints, to work with you.

It’s obviously still early days, and I know we still have a long way to go, but I hope our approach is starting to make a difference. I have seen comments from teachers who have been inspected this year describing inspections as understanding, courteous and positive. But I’m not complacent – I want to make sure that is everyone’s experience, and will do all I can to make that happen.

In particular, we want inspection to feel like it is done with you, not to you. I’ve been on the receiving end of quite a few inspections myself, and I know they can be challenging. Rightly so.

But I want you to have the confidence that inspection will be built around a respectful professional dialogue, and that we all have the same aim: the best outcomes for children.

I want you to be confident that you have the autonomy to innovate and make the decisions that deliver those outcomes for your children.

I have been clear with my teams that they must go about their work with professionalism, empathy, courtesy and respect.

And I hope, in turn, our inspectors will be received with the same. I want to calm any tensions and reduce any friction that has built up in recent months. And I know doing this will help with one of my stated ambitions – right back at the education select committee before I took up this role – I want to involve more serving practitioners, and school and college leaders in inspection.

I want to make sure we recruit inspectors who represent the best of the sectors they inspect.

People with the expertise, understanding, and empathy to make the difficult judgements, as well as to praise innovation and outstanding practice.

And who are able to interrogate and report on the things parents really care about.

In short, I want inspections of the sector, by the sector, for children and their parents.

Conclusion

Because, just like all of you, everything, everything, we do is for children.

So please get involved with our Big Listen – and help us to work better with you – in their interests.

Because we work with incredible people. Throughout my career, I’ve had the privilege to meet and work with some of the most generous, hardworking, dedicated, and passionate people. With fantastic teachers and leaders, carers and social workers, childminders and nursery staff, specialists and advisers, and all the other people who dedicate their lives to children’s education and care.

So, it’s only right that, as the inspectorate and regulator for these sectors, we reflect that excellence and live up to the standards you set.

Thank you.

Keegan: ‘I’d have punched Ofsted inspector’

The education secretary has said she would have “punched” disrespectful Ofsted inspectors that ran the rule over a school that she recently visited.

Gillian Keegan made the statement during a question-and-answer event at the Association of School and College Leaders annual conference this morning.

The senior Conservative recalled feeling “shocked” after hearing about the inspectors’ conduct as “you don’t expect somebody to come in and not be respectful”.

“I heard recently actually from a fantastic school I went into, [and] they told me how their Ofsted experience had gone,” she told the audience.

“I was shocked, I was actually shocked. I thought, ‘God, if I’d met these people, I’d have probably punched them.’ They were really rude.”

‘Completely unacceptable’

Matt Newman, national officer at the FDA union, which represents inspectors, said her comments were “completely unacceptable”.

“Ofsted inspectors are hard-working, decent people who are passionate about what they do.

“For a minister to suggest that it is acceptable to assault inspectors is irresponsible and dangerous. It will only serve to undermine the credibility of the inspection process.”

Keegan added that the “most important thing” in schools is “getting good people, retaining good people, continuing the professional development of good people, [and] listening and respecting to good people”.

“You expect people to be rude to you when you’re a politician,” she continued.

“But when you’re trying to run a school and change lives you don’t expect somebody to come in and not be respectful.”

Ofsted boss responds to Keegan comments

Keegan noted that after meeting headteacher Ruth Perry’s loved ones and reflecting on what happened, she decided “the biggest thing that we needed to change was the culture” of inspection.

Asked about Keegan’s comments, Ofsted chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver said he thought “people should act with professionalism, courtesy, empathy and respect on both sides”.

“I think [Keegan’s comments are] referring to a previous period, I’m much more interested in a fresh start and calming down tensions. That’s in far better interests for the children and professionals in the country going forward.”

UNISON head of education Mike Short said: “Clearly there’s much that can and should be improved in the way Ofsted inspections are carried out. But to suggest punching people is an appropriate reaction is not becoming of a government minister.

“Making light of violence in schools when staff are increasingly likely to face assaults while doing their job is in very poor taste. Ofsted inspectors are already dealing with a great deal of hostility while they work. So much for showing respect.”

Correction: This article has been amended to add ‘probably’ into Keegan’s comment about punching an inspector

Ofsted website change will show ‘component’ grades – Oliver

Ofsted will change its website so visitors see the “full range of component grades” for each provider “at a glance”, and not just their overall effectiveness.

Announcing the change at the ASCL conference this morning, new chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver said the change “neither promises nor precludes further changes to our gradings, but I hope it shows that we are listening”.

At present, each college or training organisation’s page on Ofsted’s website only shows the headline judgment for each inspection.

The change will mean that, for each inspection, the pages will also show all the component judgments – quality of education, behaviour and attitudes, personal development and leadership and management – as well as ratings for early years provision if they have it.

FE Week understands Ofsted is aiming to make the change by mid-April. 

‘Much more than just the overall grade’

Oliver said Ofsted had heard ASCL members’ views and is “acting”.

“You are clear that all the sub-judgments that Ofsted makes about your schools matter and all should be seen. And it should be about much more than just the overall grade.

“By showing the full range of judgments, we hope that parents will be better able to compare providers.

“Better able to see a more rounded, contextual picture that speaks to what they care about: behaviour and attitudes to learning, quality of education, their child’s personal development and the way the school or college is run.”

It comes as Oliver launched the watchdog’s ‘big listen’, a 12-week consultation on further inspection changes following the death of headteacher Ruth Perry.

This comprises an online survey, which staff, education organisations and parents are urged to complete. 

There is no specific proposal on axing single-phrase judgments, which would require a change in government policy. But a free text box in the section of the consultation on reporting can be used for feedback on this issue.

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 454

Kim Morrison

Regional Growth Director, Woodspeen Training

Start date: February 2024

Previous Job: Head of Employer Partnerships, Woodspeen Training

Interesting fact: Kim has always been passionate about the opportunities apprenticeships can give young people. Living in a deprived town (Blackpool), she has watched apprentices lives and careers transformed through their courses.


Paul Padda

Interim Principal and CEO, East Coast College

Start date: February 2024

Previous Job: Deputy Principal, East Coast College

Interesting fact: After moving to the region, Paul ran a street food business with a friend offering a range of Indian and South African foods – he even ran a bar from a horsebox!