Six ‘impacts and benefits’ of Gazelle

More than £3.5m of public money was paid out by 23 principals to Gazelle group of colleges, FE Week revealed in edition 107, where it was also highlighted that the highest-paying individual college dished out £642,000. The editor’s comment went on to question the wisdom of such spending in light of the fact no independent research had been published looking at what, if any, benefits that membership of Gazelle brings. Stella Mbubaegbu CBE responds on behalf of Gazelle.

We are taking this opportunity to set out in some detail what we believe Gazelle delivers and why colleges have chosen to align themselves with the common goal of developing an entrepreneurial and enterprising culture and practice.

The Gazelle Colleges Group is a not-for-profit membership group, and I am writing in the capacity of elected chair. We are a democratic group where both the leadership and spend are collectively debated and determined.

The Gazelle impact has been real for our colleges

Here we seek to set out the facts as they stand on investment within the group. Above all we want to be clear about the aims and objectives of Gazelle — and essentially it is to help colleges create more vibrant learning environments and experiences for students, and to prepare for a challenging financial future where enterprise and new revenue growth will be necessary to help compensate for loss of public funding.

The primary impacts and benefits of Gazelle are the sharing of knowledge, enterprise competitions, leadership development, entrepreneur network, curriculum development and commerciality.

So firstly, knowledge sharing and the organised and coordinated sharing of innovation, training and research across 23 colleges. We have six cross-college working groups in areas ranging from curriculum development to commercial growth, teaching and learning, marketing and student experience and science, technology, engineering and maths (Stem).

This shared activity is producing major benefits, including a model for Gazelle Stem centres, pioneered by South West College, now adopted by two additional Gazelle colleges with more to follow.

Secondly, on enterprise competitions, Gazelle has encouraged and enabled significant student engagement in national enterprise competitions and in a range of social enterprise activities. In the past three years, students from across the college network have participated in both the Market Maker Challenge and the Pantrepreneur social enterprise competition.

These are essential to the motivation and development of students, equipping them with skills, experience and confidence that traditional qualifications alone cannot.

Thirdly, leadership development and since 2012 Gazelle has been working with Babson College, America’s leading business school for entrepreneurship, to co-create a leadership development programme in which 90 staff have now participated. Indeed this has been evaluated in considerable detail by the Education and Training Foundation (ETF), a supportive report we will invite the ETF to make more widely available.

Fourthly, entrepreneur network. Gazelle has developed an exceptional network of business leaders and entrepreneurs for the benefit of our member colleges. Our colleges are challenged to grow income and create new markets and to this end we are working with people who have experience at the highest level. Contributors to Gazelle events and reports have included Confederation of British Industry (CBI) director-general John Cridland CBE, Patisserie Valerie owner Luke Johnson and former Dyson chief executive Martin McCourt.

Fifthly was curriculum development
and more than 60 curriculum leaders at Gazelle colleges have completed world-class training and development with university and college practitioners from around the world.

The learning from this activity has already manifested itself in quite radical curriculum reform in many Gazelle colleges, increasing relevance and reducing costs to students.

Finally, commerciality. The development of the Gazelle Learning Company model is helping to create both a realistic commercial environment in which students learn vital business skills, and also new revenue streams for colleges through employer partnerships and enhanced recruitment potential. We are working with the UK Commission for Employment and Skills, the CBI and the ETF on an independent evaluation of this.

Gazelle’s overriding ambition remains to equip colleges and students alike for a fast-changing world and we welcome an honest dialogue on how this is to be achieved.

We do not pretend to have all the answers, but are confident that the Gazelle impact has been real for our colleges and that the group and its aims will continue to flourish in the years to come.

Stella Mbubaegbu CBE, chair of the Gazelle Colleges Group and principal of Highbury College, Portsmouth

 

Upturn in 16 to 18 apprenticeship fortunes

The fortunes of 16 to 18 apprenticeships appear to be changing with the first year-on-year rise for the third quarter (Q3) of the academic year since 2010/11.

The number of under 19 apprenticeship starts for Q3 of the current academic year was 18,400 — the same period last year was 17,300, in 2011/12 it was 21,300 and in 2010/11 it was 24,800, but the year before that it had been 23,700.

The figures from the Statistical First Release, out on Thursday (June 26), were all provisional, but for August to April (quarters one, two and three) they also showed improvement with 95,200 16 to 18 starts this year versus 90,900 in 2012/13 — although in 2011/12 it had been 104,500.

Skills Minister Matthew Hancock told FE Week: “These provisional statistics show this government is supporting young people, with an increase in the number of 16 to 18-year-olds starting apprenticeships.”

However, the overall number of apprentices in Q3 fell by 900 on last year’s 100,400 and for August to April it was down by 45,600 from 360,200 due to declines in both 19 to 24 and 25+ apprentice starts.

The SFR further revealed there had been 7,400 traineeship start since the programme was launched in August, up until April.

The principal of a large and well-established FE college writes about life at the top — the worries, the hopes, the people and the issues they have to deal with every day.

Time to budget

Further education is a funny place to be at the best of times, but this time of year it’s always testing and leaves most principals mentally exhausted, not to mention bereft of humour.

The budget of course and, sadly, the more-often-than-not resulting cost savings that prove necessary along with the dreaded reorganisation and redundancies.

There has been much said and written of late about the fate of colleges up and down the land slipping from lofty heights either because the finances have gone to pot or Ofsted grades have worsened — and in some isolated cases both.

Indeed even the mighty 157 Group has had its casualties. So when last week I received, as all principals and chairs of governors did, a letter from FE Commissioner Dr David Collins, it read as a gloomy reminder of what can and is happening to colleges.

Let’s face it, it’s a tough and often lonely job being a principal — constantly being reminded of what fate lays in store for you should you fall from grace.

Loans opportunity

The current adult funding regime and methodology has been geared to save the government money, of course, however the introduction of 24+ advanced learning loans is in my view an opportunity for most colleges to increase income to offset the decrease in adult funding.

There is a downside however, and the process and, critically, the time it takes for the decision on the loan is not always as smooth and quick as it should be.

What’s clear is that loans are the shape of the future for most adult funding and I suspect the gap that currently exists for 19 to 24-year-olds will soon be plugged.

I like the loans system — it puts the emphasis on the college to be more competitive and customer-focused, which can’t be a bad thing in my view.

Gazelle

The recent FE Week article on Gazelle got me thinking. While almost without exception most principals aspire to create a culture and ethos of entrepreneurship for students and indeed the college itself, does it really require paid membership to a group to do this?

Money is tight for everyone, but handing out significant sums of public money to become a member college seems to be slightly perverse in a sector where sharing good practice, collaboration and expertise is the norm — or is it?

I’m not sure who really benefits although to be fair and balanced, some of the member colleges have been cited by our cheery friends from Ofsted as improving.

Adult Learner’s Week

I couldn’t go on without saying how pleasing it was recently to see the National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (Niace) pull out all the stops for Adult Learners’ Week.

Well done David Hughes [Niace chief executive] and the team and thank you.

My own college put on a range of activities and events and what was genuinely gratifying was the passion and enthusiasm of everyone who took part.

Adult learning changes people’s lives. It transforms individuals and families and enables them to accomplish so much. I feel so humbled when I meet and see people from all walks of life, ethnicity, religion, and gender trust the college with their futures.

We should lobby harder for adult leaning and protect the funding going forward — it’s our duty to the future generation of adult learners.

Budget, again

Well, one more board meeting for the year — the final budget ready; hopes and dreams for the year ahead; many happy and successful students finishing up; and, staff looking forward to the well-earned holidays. Which reminds me, I really must book something soon.

Principals, enjoy your summer — you also deserve a rest. Forget about Mr Gove, Dr Collins, politicians and policy-makers. Worry not about Ofsted (well, at least for now) and forget the finances… oh, by the way, how are the application numbers looking?

See you in September for another fun-packed year.

The Secret Pricipal features on the last Monday of every month

 

Sue Pember, education consultant

A veteran of the skills sector, Dr Sue Pember has worked under eight Secretaries of State, from David Blunkett to Dr Vince Cable.

But despite having left her government job for a life of freelance consultancy work earlier this year, the 59-year-old mother-of-one still won’t say who was her favourite boss.

“I definitely have favourites, but that’s definitely to be kept to myself”, says Pember.

Pember was born in Pontypridd, South Wales, and after what she describes as a “very good” childhood, she turned to teaching, a path which had been set out for her at an early age.

“When I was in the primary school I was very keen on swimming and they knew this,” she says, “so we had to write an essay on what we wanted to be when we grew up.

“My essay was really quite simple. I wanted to be a competitive swimmer, and to sponsor myself to do the swimming, I wanted to be a hairdresser. A week after writing the essay, I was told I had to go to the headmaster’s study because he had said my ambition wasn’t great enough and I had to write the essay again.

“I suppose, coming from a working class background, you don’t get many role models of different types of job. I didn’t want to be a doctor, so what do you say? I thought saying I wanted to be a teacher would pacify him, so I wrote the essay saying I wanted to be a teacher. I did pacify him, and that’s when I decided it was the easiest thing to do.”

I definitely have favourites, but that’s definitely to be kept to myself

Originally enrolled at Glamorgan College of Education on Barry Island for a certificate of education, Pember was guided by the “progressive” college towards the degree route, which was to become the norm in the changing world of teaching.

She says: “When we were there the law changed about teacher status and they made it very clear to us at the time we left that it would be a degree profession. So we stayed on an extra year to do the degree, and that’s how I did it.

“I think it was a very progressive teacher training course. It talked about marketing, it talked about ensuring parents were happy. It talked about your own ambitions, like if you wanted to be a head teacher you had to move jobs every three years, it was actually very ambitious about the students.”

Emerging with a Bachelor of Education degree issued by the University of Wales, and having specialised in textiles and geography, Pember felt Wales did not have what she was looking for, but Redbridge Technical College did in the form of a textiles lecturer job.

“I hadn’t seen myself teaching in FE,” says Pember, “but mainly because I didn’t know much about it.

Pember, aged 11, after swimming
Pember, aged 11, after swimming

“If I had known about FE, I think I would have done my A-levels in it, because it turns out one of my friends from grammar school did and did it part time and was able to work. If I had realised that, that would probably have been my route.

She adds: “The move to London didn’t faze me, although my students of the day were more street-savvy than me, and would get nervous for me going out at night.

“My 16-year-old students were more nervous for me than for themselves. But I already had a friend working up here, it didn’t seem strange. Also, my nana, before the First World War when she was young, she moved to London to play the piano in Oxford Street at Woolworths.

When somebody wanted some music, they didn’t know what it sounded like so she actually demonstrated it in the shop.”

Pember worked at Redbridge from 1977 until 1983, when she became deputy head and lecturer at Southgate College in North London.

Three years later, after steering a pilot scheme aimed at connecting colleges with industry, she moved into her first policy role at local authority level.

“A bit of me was sad about leaving the students,” she says, “but it was still related to making things better for them. When I was growing up my Saturday jobs and holiday jobs were in factories in South Wales.

With a cousin outside number 10“But when I started teaching textiles, there was a discord between what gets taught and what I could see operating in a factor. Simple things like the way a zip was put in. That was my first feeling that we could do better.”

Pember’s senior role in the education department at the London Borough of Enfield lasted from 1986 to 1991, when the incorporation of colleges beckoned her to a new kind of role at Canterbury College. She remained there as principal for nine years.

In 2000, Pember took her first government job when she was recruited to implement David Blunkett’s Skills 4 Life initiative, one she is particularly proud of, but to this day Pember remains adamant she had never wanted to be a civil servant.

She says: “I came in to government for a very specific role. It would only have been that role which would have attracted me out of a college. I came to lead a national initiative which was really quite important.

“Every three or four years we did a baseline survey, and the one that was completed in 2011/12 demonstrated that something like 10m people had improved their literacy up to level two. That was a huge achievement, however, the pipeline never stopped and there were still more people to help and that’s why this government has such a focus on literacy and numeracy now.”

In 2004, Pember conducted the then-Labour government’s first review of apprenticeships, which led to a change in policy direction.

Pember and her husband in Zermatt, in Switzerland
Pember and her husband in Zermatt, in Switzerland

She says: “From that review, which I’m quite proud of, that then incentivised government to put more money into it. It was a springboard to where we are with apprenticeships now. We made it clear that there was a case for investment and it’s worked.

“If you look back at the results in 2003, something like less than 25 per cent passed. The achievement success for apprenticeships now is amazing. I think the growth has been at the right level. You can’t go at it too fast.”

Pember worked for the Department for Education and Employment, which became the Department for Education and Skills [DFES]. The now defunct Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills [DIUS] eased her transition into the new Department for Business, Innovation and Skills [BIS], a transition she admits to having found very exciting.

She says: “It would have been a lot more of a culture shock doing straight from DFES into BIS. But those three years in DIUS generated a vision and mission that was important for the country.

“So when it went into the old department for industry, it was like a change agent because it was already formed with what we needed to do, and therefore it gave
Vince Cable a good platform when he got there.

“It was an exciting transition for me. People would assume that I’m an educator, but if you look back at my history, all I’ve done is try to bring education closer to employment, closer to industry, so going into a department where they’ve got posters about manufacturing everywhere was like going home for me.”

 

Glory beckons in Brazil for WorldSkills UK hopefuls

England’s hopes for the World Cup glory in Brazil may have been dashed, but the hunt for young people to do the UK proud at WorldSkills in São Paulo next year is well under way.

A WorldSkills UK squad selection event took place in Belfast last week, with 160 young people competing across 37 skills — and FE Week went along to find out what it takes to be among the best.

The three days of competition, hosted by Northern Regional College, Belfast Metropolitan College and College of Agriculture, Food and Rural Enterprise, kicked off on Monday, June 23.

As well as technical skill and an ability to cope under pressure, the competitors have to have the potential for development, as getting in to the squad means 11 months of intensive training before the final team to go to Brazil is announced.

Yolande-Stanley-e108
From left: Yolande Stanley,WorldSkills UK confectionary training manager, Mike Zietek, judge and executive chocalatier at Mars, and Will Torrent, medal-winning chef from 2007 WorldSkills

“The standard expected at squad selection is a step up from the regional competitions,” said WorldSkills UK stonemasonry judge Marc Pate, a production manager at Wells Cathedral Stonemasons in Somerset.

“When they get to WorldSkills, it’ll be even higher again, and the marks that win a medal will be in the 95th percentile and above, so they’ve got to be really hitting almost perfection.”

As a former competitor himself, Marc can appreciate what involvement in WorldSkills can do, even for those who do not progress past the squad stage.

“It’s hugely confidence building,” said the former student of Northamptonshire’s Moulton College.

Northern Ireland’s Employment and Learning Minister, Stephen Farry, with Gillian Greenfield, chemistry lecturer at Belfast Metropolitan College
Northern Ireland’s Employment and Learning Minister, Stephen Farry, with Gillian Greenfield, chemistry lecturer at Belfast Metropolitan College

“Both professionally and personally — you’re able to work at great speed, which employers love, and it’s almost a platform for further development because it gives you that feeling of ‘OK, I’ve done this, what can I do next?’”

The competition can have a positive effect on teachers as well, according to WorldSkills UK confectionery training manager Yolande Stanley who also lectures at Westminster Kingsway College.

Marc Pate, WorldSkills UK stonemasonry training manager
Marc Pate, WorldSkills UK stonemasonry judge

“It keeps me up to the top of the grade just by watching other people, even watching competitors and what they’re drawing from their mentors – it’s CPD [continuing professional development] on a massive scale,” she said.

It’s the first time squad selection has been held outside of England, and Northern Ireland’s Employment and Learning Minister, Stephen Farry, was in hand to welcome competitors.

Robyn Clarke, aged 19, works at mechatronics
Robyn Clarke, aged 19, works at mechatronics

He told FE Week: “We’re very pleased squad selection is happening in Northern Ireland and we wish competitors every success.

“They’ve been very successful to get to this stage already and not everybody will be chosen to go on to the squad. But for those who will be, we are confident that the UK team will put in a great performance.”

The UK squad for WorldSkills São Paulo, which takes place from August 11 to 15 next year, will be announced on July 7 — so check the FE Week website to find out who made the cut.

Main pic: Brendan Magee, aged 20, painting and decorating

Danny-Hoang-box-out-e108

 

‘Enemy’ minister Hancock hands union £15m

Skills Minister Matthew Hancock pledged £15m of government support for Unionlearn next academic year having been labelled an “enemy” before he addressed the trade union body’s annual conference.

A delegate asked why an MP from “the enemy” had been invited instead of a Labour politician, before Mr Hancock outlined the government’s ongoing support for Unionlearn last Monday (June 23).

The learning and skills arm of the Trades Union Congress (TUC) was awarded a Department for Business, Innovation and Skills grant of £18.9m for this academic year — down from £20.2m the previous year.

“Despite tight finances that we all recognise, we’re backing your efforts by providing over £15m of funding for Unionlearn — funding that will continue in 2014 to 2015,” said Mr Hancock.

“In addition, we’ve also protected the £210m annual Community Learning budget — even though finances remain tight — because we know the importance of non-formal learning.

“You deserve credit for reaching out to disadvantaged workers, people who face some of the biggest barriers to accessing in training and development at work, but who arguably have much to gain from it.”

He had also earlier paid tribute to Unionlearn’s network of learning reps. “We want everyone of all ages, especially young people, to benefit from this growth in jobs and opportunities, and that means addressing the urgent need for skills for everyone, adult learners as well as school pupils. I know that we share this goal and we are working together to achieve it,” said Mr Hancock. “We support Unionlearn because you in turn, through 30,000 union learning reps, work to reach deep into the UK workforce to drive up skills.”

The conference took place at London’s Congress House. Frances O’Grady, TUC general secretary, was one of the speakers. She said recent months had been “tough” after a one-fifth cut in government funding, but said the “professionalism and commitment” of staff had kept the programme alive.

She said: “This year there have been 34 successful bids for new workplace projects, each one different, each one making a difference, and that’s what our work is all about.”

There was also a memorandum of understanding signed during the conference by Unionlearn board chair Dr Mary Bousted and National Extension College (NEC) chief executive Dr Ros Morpeth aimed at making it easier for union members and Union Learning reps to improve skills for work through online and distance learning.

The agreement gives UK trade union members a 10 per cent discount on all NEC courses, including GCSE, IGCSE and A-levels.

Dr Bousted said: “The flexible provision offered by providers like NEC makes it easier than ever for businesses to fit employee development into the workplace.”

Dr Morpeth said: “Our agreement to work more closely with Unionlearn recognises our joint commitment to give more opportunities to learn to people who missed out first time around.”

HMRC to give out learner details

A new government bill aims to allow Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to give out learner details for the first time.

The Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill means anonymised former FE learners’ job, education or benefit claimant status could be tracked through the tax system and passed on to colleges and schools.

The bill, which also contains legislation covering zero-hour contracts and transparency measures on company ownership among other things, could lead to new funding and performance management measures for providers, as well as allowing wage gain analyses.

It has been welcomed by Joy Mercer, director of education policy at the Association of Colleges, amid hopes it could pave the way for a robust destination data system.

She told FE Week: “The measures introduced in this bill to improve the provision of information about the destinations of 16 to 18-year-olds by linking this to other national data, including that held by HMRC, is in line with the experimental data about to be released by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills for adults.

“This approach will appeal to colleges as they currently spend inordinate amounts of money trying to track the destinations of former students. DfE was initially unable to adopt this method of collecting data via HMRC for 16 to 18-year-olds without a change in legislation; this bill provides that legislative change.

“In short it will make it easier to collect the destinations of students from other sources of public information as long as individuals cannot be identified.”

It comes in addition to mandatory requirements for providers to collect data on what happens to learners after they finish courses in individualised learner records (ILR) from 2014/15.

The new bill was introduced to Parliament on Wednesday, June 25, by Business Secretary Dr Vince Cable.

However, the Department for Education (DfE) is handling the destination data element of the bill.

A DfE spokesperson said: “The bill will help us assess how effective education or training is by better understanding the impact of education choices on careers, the relationship between pupil attainment and earnings, and by improving destination data.”

A date for the bill’s second reading in Parliament is yet to be announced.

Agency loses tolerance on delivery

A Skills Funding Agency clampdown on under-delivery next academic year has prompted concerns that providers could be hit by growing “financial instability”.

The agency is cutting its tolerance of under-delivery, meaning more providers could be hit with an in-year reduction to their allocation.

This academic year, providers who were 15 per cent below their SFA contract target at November 2013 faced an in-year reduction. At February this year the tolerance level was 8 per cent and at May it was 5 per cent.

However, next academic year the levels are falling to 12 per cent, 6 per cent and 3 per cent, respectively.

Both the Association of Colleges (AoC) and the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) warned against the move.

An AoC spokesperson told FE Week: “Despite rising demands to fund apprentices, adult learners and people who are out of work, the agency has less money available in its budget.

“There’s naturally pressure on the agency to redistribute funds during the year, but there is also a risk that such decreasing of tolerance with regard to in-year reductions will add to financial instability within the sector and institutions.”

The levels, which apply to contracts worth more than £10,000, were laid out in the agency’s Operational Performance Management Rules 2014 to 2015 published on Wednesday (June 25).

Stewart Segal, AELP chief executive, said: “The current system was developed when there was more flexibility in the Adult Skills Budget. We now have restrictions on the opportunity to vire funds so it is very difficult for providers to manage delivery to four quarterly measurement points as well as managing to a financial year and an contract year.

“The reduction of the thresholds will make this management even more difficult, so the agency has to be very clear as to what the priority delivery programmes are and their decision-making must be more transparent and timely to enable providers to respond to the contract changes.

“We have had several instances where contract increases come far too late to deliver the increased volume and reductions are made in the following quarter.

“With these reduced thresholds and the new contract management system within the agency, we need a full review of how the system will work in 2014-15.

“We also believe that any system of in-year contract reviews should apply to all providers.

“Providers will have to deliver Trailblazer pilots from within their existing allocations but we hope any changes to volumes will be taken into account in the quarterly reviews.

“Those quarterly reviews must also be open and transparent and must allow providers to make a case for retaining volumes where specific circumstances affect their delivery profile.”

An agency spokesperson said: “We are seeing improved performance by providers against contract values, and have therefore adjusted the tolerances to reflect more closely the actual pattern of performance.

“As now, providers will be able to make a case for retaining contract values where they can demonstrate that their profile of delivery will differ from the performance profile.”

Anti-voc quals favouritism fear

Official judgement on 2012/13 provision for 16 to 19-year-olds could be weighted against those offering mainly vocational qualifications, the Association of Colleges (AoC) has warned.

The Education Funding Agency said on Friday (June 20) that it would use the minimum standards of 2011/12 for the following academic year.

Its key stage five minimum standards, which take into account 16 to 18-year-olds’ performance in A-levels and other level three academic and vocational qualifications, branded school sixth forms or colleges as underperforming if their results showed less than than 40 per cent of students achieving an average point score per entry in vocational qualifications of at least 194.

And for academic qualifications it was fewer than 40 per cent of students achieving an average point score per entry of at least 172 points.

Failing to meet the minimum standards in either academic or vocational courses would lead to colleges being given written or verbal notice to improve, and would prompt a visit from the EFA commissioner.

However, the AoC warned colleges offering more vocational qualifications could be more likely to fall foul of the rules.

Joy Mercer, AoC director of education policy, told FE Week: “Although these interim standards remain the same as last year, our original concerns persist.

“For academic qualifications the standards are fixed at an average grade D achievement, which is recognised as low achievement, whereas for many vocational qualifications the average is fixed at merit and in some qualifications a mixture of merit and distinction — this is considered by all to be a good achievement.

“This anomaly could lead to a college which delivers mainly vocational qualifications finding it more of a challenge to be above minimum standards than a school where the main programmes are A-levels.”

The agency calculates minimum standards by taking the highest average scores for both academic and vocational qualifications in the bottom 5 per cent of post-16 schools and colleges — the fifth percentile — giving the 194 figure for vocational qualifications and 172 for academic qualifications.

The agency spokesperson said: “By establishing separate measures for performance in academic and vocational qualifications, comparing like with like, we are able to build a clear picture of how institutions are performing in different areas of their level three provision.”

Standards for the 2013/14 academic year are due to be agreed in August.

Mrs Mercer added: “AoC agrees there have to be standards that support student success and progression but don’t want to see disincentives to offer vocational qualifications and challenging mixed programmes… further work needs to be done before the Department for Education makes its decision on precise measures in the autumn.

“As qualifications for 16 to 18-year-olds change in 2016 we hope minimum standards will reflect the challenges of the new qualifications.”