Is your college a ‘going concern’?

What would happen to your college if the Skills Funding Agency held back funding for 45 days? It’s just one of the tough questions that need to be asked if you’re planning to stay afloat, says Ian Sackree.

One of the most (if not the most) important tasks for the college’s accounting officer, is to ensure that the college remains a Going Concern — and is a ‘thriving business’, even in the most challenging of times.

To fulfil this responsibility it is not necessary for the principal to be an accountant, but it is essential to ask the right questions of the accountant, and often.

Look at your own financial situation (or perhaps that of others you know) and imagine life without the next three pay slips and without replacement employment.

Some commentators suggest that more than 80 per cent of us could be facing mortgage arrears or eviction if we had to go 90 days or more without income, but with the same level of expenditure. This is a practical, sobering interpretation of Going Concern.

The problem with Going Concern is that you generally only hear the term from your auditor, once a year at accounts sign-off time.

Given that the number of acutely balanced colleges is believed to be 50-plus and rising, I suggest to you that ‘Going Concern’ and ‘Organisational Sensitivity — the what if? questions ‘ought (if not already) to rapidly become part of your daily and weekly leadership and management overview.

Do not leave it to the finance committee that meets too infrequently to be wholly effective; start to take an interest today

Now I know that for every financially-qualified or savvy principal there is a principal and chief executive out there who prefers only to know the necessary when finance is concerned. Now that’s OK to a point — what on earth would the sector look like if it were led by just accountants. But let’s not forget the role and responsibility attributed under the FE Act to the accounting officer. This cannot be delegated so my advice is to start to ask some frequent and regular questions of those in the college that do and should know about the factors associated with Going Concern.

Do not leave it to the finance committee that meets too infrequently to be wholly effective; start to take an interest today.

These are my top tips for those who are feeling the financial noose tightening: monitor (and discuss with your senior leadership team) reported bank balances and cash projections weekly; make it your business to understand where the cash is coming from over the next 12 months, and any timing issues that may arise between significant payments out and receipts in. Remember, cash is king.

Understanding cash days is key; it’s your 90-day plan.

Guard your college’s cash; avoid capital project-creep or the ‘can you just’ jobs in estates and ICT that may unwittingly eat in to your cash.

Ask questions about long-term debtors. Are there any chunky ones over 90 days, if so, why? Effective credit control is essential.

On the journey in to college each morning ask yourself a new ‘what if?’ question — what if the SFA withheld payment for 45 days, could we run the payroll? What if the SFA clawed £1m back under audit, could we pay the final balance on the new build? If the answer is ‘No’ then you have a challenge.

For cash purposes remember that depreciation is your friend. It is a non-cash expense in the income and expenditure account, which effectively makes it cash generative. It is not the long-term solution to ‘feed off the estate’ but it will get you through the next three years if you can spend less than your depreciation charge on estate and ICT infrastructure.

Make a point of asking your financial director to reconcile monthly management accounts to the college cash forecast. If a planned surplus of £500k switches to a deficit of £500k then you have a ‘negative swing’ of £1m in your bank account that needs financing.

Make it your business to know your college bank relationship director, and keep your borrowing facilities (short-term and long-term) under regular review. Include this as board-business.

Watch the use of ‘Income Accruals’. It’s a common trick to replace income not yet invoiced with income that we think in an ideal world has actually been earned. If used correctly, no problem. In difficult times they can however be used to ‘prop up’ income when delivery may actually be behind the level of income recognised.

 

SFAsteps in for campus revamp go ahead at cash-strapped college

A cash-strapped East Midlands college’s plans for a multimillion pound campus revamp have been saved after the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) and local authority stepped in with £12m of funding.

New College Nottingham (NCN) has already had a grant of £15m from the SFA for its Basford Hall campus redevelopment, and the new deal will bring the funding up to the £27m needed for the work.

It is understood finances at the college, which triggered an inspection from FE Commissioner Dr David Collins in February, had proved a concern for potential bank lenders.

However, a spokesperson for the college, which suffered a loss of £2.4m last academic year, said it would now be able to open the revamped campus on time this September following a £5m loan from Nottingham City Council and, FE Week understands, a £5m SFA grant and exceptional financial support of £2m.

Principal Dawn Whitemore (pictured) said the Basford Hall campus deal was “a solution that safeguards what is the single biggest investment in FE in the city for many years”.

“The college has been involved in financial discussions with our funding partners for some time,” she said.

The new campus will accommodate 4,500 construction, science, engineering and technology students a year.

A Nottingham City Council spokesperson said: “Basford Hall is such an important college site — it’s in the heart of the north of the city, surrounded by the communities most in need of support in developing skills for work.” He added the funding package would “help NCN on its road to financial recovery”.

An SFA spokesperson said NCN’s initial grant was approved in November 2013 through the College Capital Investment Fund (CCIF).

“Through the year end management of the CCIF programme and clarification of funding available it was agreed that a further grant could be awarded to NCN as part of their CCIF project in accordance with the ‘rules’ of the CCIF programme,” she said.

Financial issues at the college, which is looking to shed around 80 posts, mean it has also been forced to put its contribution to a £60m city-wide skills hub on hold — although it remains involved with a scheme steering group. “We are working together with Central College Nottingham and other partners on the Skills Hub development,” said Ms Whitemore.

“It has been a challenge to commit to the levels of resource needed, but both colleges are still committed.”

Dr Collins’ report on NCN, which was given a grade three rating by Ofsted in June, is yet to be published.

 

Golden girl Rebecca opens splashing new sports centre

Double Olympic gold medal-winning swimmer Rebecca Adlington officially opened a new £13.5m sports centre for Blackburn College.

It was developed by the college and the local authority and is open to both students and the community.

It was opened with the unveiling of a commemorative plaque by Ms Adlington, who retired from competitive swimming last year.

She took a tour of the facilities before taking part in a Q&A session with learners.

The complex features two sports halls, an 80-station fitness gym, aerobics and separate spinning studios, a 25-metre swimming pool, training pool and a sports science performance and testing laboratory.

Blackburn College governors’ board chair Bill Taylor said: “I would like to salute the council and the college for their courage and creativity in creating such a world class facility.”

Main pic: Rebecca Adlington joins students from Blackburn College at the opening of the Blackburn sports and leisure centre. From left: Level three extended diploma in sport learners Paige Brogan, aged 16, Nathan Hartshorne, 18, Ms Adlington, level three sport diploma students Nicole Carter, 18 and Josh Bristol, 17

 

Coalition parties let manifesto differences get between them

Funding increases, University Technical Colleges (UTCs) near every English city, a commission on funding for lifelong learning and millions of apprenticeships were on the agenda as the two Coalition parties went head-to-head with their general election manifestos.

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats may have presided over the same education policies in Government, but apart from common ground over boosting apprenticeship numbers, each party tried to distance itself from the other as they launched their manifestos a day apart.

The Tories chose UTC Swindon as the venue for their manifesto launch, which was light on new announcements for FE. Prime Minister David Cameron promised a UTC “within reach of every city” and the manifesto document announced plans to publish “more earnings and destination data for FE courses”.

When challenged by FE Week about low students numbers for UTCs following the launch on Tuesday (April 14), Education Secretary Nicky Morgan (pictured above left) was up-beat about the programme.

She said: “I think we will see an improvement in recruitment. UTCs are a very important part of our overall education offer.”

The Lib Dems, who launched their manifesto in a warehouse in Battersea, West London, the following day, pledged to factor rising learner numbers into their two to 19 budget protection, which will result in a real-terms rise in funding. They also announced plans for a cross-party commission to examine adult learning funding.

Education Minister David Laws (pictured above right) said he hoped his party would be able to increase Adult Skills Budget funding from 2017/18 after “balancing the books”.

He told FE Week: “Because we are doing something very different from the Tories after 2017/18, which is growing public spending in line with the growth of the economy, it’s going to mean we have got much more money than the Tories for areas such as that. I would aspire to that (increase in post-19 education funding) but I can’t promise it because we are defining our pledges in the terms we have defined them here today.”

The proposals sparked a mixed reaction from sector leaders. Association of Colleges chief executive Martin Doel said new UTCs should be opened only in areas where places were needed, and called on the Tories to match Labour and the Lib Dems’ extension of the funding ringfence to include 16 to 19 education.

He said: “The Liberal Democrats’ pledge to protect education funding from cradle to college is very welcome one. But simply protecting the current allocations from further cuts freezing won’t ensure a sustainable and balanced system.

“In this context we are therefore very pleased that the Liberal Democrats have committed to a series of cross-party commissions on issues such as lifelong learning, national colleges and a review of VAT rules for sixth form and further education colleges.”

Association of Employment and Learning Providers chief executive Stewart Segal warned against the “chasing of substantial volume targets” on apprenticeships and said that any expansion of the programme would have to be matched with expanded investment.

He added: “Mr Laws’ comments on starting to reverse the cuts in the adult skills budget from 2017/18 are welcome in addition to his party’s protection of the 16 to 19 budget.

“While funding for apprenticeships and traineeships is currently prioritised, we believe that funding to provide skills for the unemployed is also important to help people into sustainable employment and earn at least a living wage.”

Plans for the commission on adult learning funding were also welcomed by the National Institute of Adult Continuing Education, which called for similar in its own manifesto. Deputy chief executive Tom Stannard said: “We are ready to help any future government make the work of this commission a success.”

Conservatives

 

3m apprenticeship starts in the course of the next Parliament

University Technical Colleges within reach of every city in England

Continued replacement of low-level FE courses with apprenticeships

Continued improvement of FE through new national colleges

Publication of more earnings and destination data for FE colleges

Abolition of employers’ national insurance contributions for apprentices under 25

 

Liberal Democrats

 

Higher spending on two to 19 education based on rising learner numbers

Increase in number of apprenticeships and extension of apprenticeship grant

Review of VAT treatment of general FE and sixth form colleges

Establishment of a cross-party commission on lifelong learning funding

Development of national colleges

Increase in number of apprentices from BAME backgrounds

 

 

Sea change in training for 2,000-mile swim

Hartpury College staff are facing their biggest challenge yet in training a charity fundraiser to swim across the Atlantic from Africa to Brazil, writes Billy Camden.

Swimming 2,000 miles in 6.5m strokes may seem an impossible task to most, but not father-of-one Ben Hooper, who will have four Hartpury College lecturers to thank if he succeeds in crossing the Atlantic.

Richard Collins, Tom Cresswell, Ben Drury and James McCarron are the sports and exercise team behind 36-year-old Ben, whose swim is due to begin in November.

The 90-day challenge will see Ben swimming front crawl for up to 12 hours a-day when he starts his ‘Swim the Big Blue’ adventure in aid of four charities — Plastic Oceans Foundation, Maggie’s Cancer Care Centres, Addaction and SOS Children’s Villages.

Ben Hooper
Ben Hooper

He could come face-to-face with deadly jellyfish and 30ft waves, not to mention killer sharks.

Ben said: “This is without doubt the biggest challenge I have ever faced.

“I am on a mission to prove that nothing is impossible and the support of Richard, Tom, Ben and James at Hartpury has been invaluable in preparing me, both physically and mentally, for what lies ahead.”

And the man charged with making Ben mentally strong enough for the challenge is chartered sport and exercise psychologist Richard, head of sports psychology at Hartpury.

He said: “Ben will face difficult and dangerous conditions, not to mention overwhelming fatigue and, although he’ll be supported by a crew, contact with them will be minimal. Being effectively alone for two months or more is a huge psychological barrier to overcome and in-depth mental and physical preparation will be vital to his success.

“We’re monitoring Ben’s heart rate, sleep patterns and emotional state on a daily basis and I’m trying to find his breaking point – that’s something you have to practice.”

Ben will also swim through the Doldrums — areas near the equator infamous for their stillness and humidity, and not forgetting the prospect of raging storms.

Learners at Hartpury College will benefit from the challenge by using it as a case study on their courses. And after the challenge is completed, Ben will visit the students to give inspirational talks and workshops.

From left: Ben Drury, Richard Collins, Ben Hooper and Tom Cresswell at the training facilities at Hartpury College
From left: Ben Drury, Richard Collins, Ben Hooper and Tom Cresswell at the training facilities at Hartpury College

“The best way for us to teach sports science as lecturers is to use case studies and this one is perfect for us because we are physically involved in it,” said Richard.

“The students are responding great and are really excited for the talks later in the year.”

Head of physiotherapy at Hartpury Tom Cresswell aims to make Ben as physically ready for the challenge as possible, as he could be burning up to 12,000 calories a-day.

Tom said: “This will be a gruelling trial of endurance and the focus will be on building robust shoulders and a torso that doesn’t waste energy. An efficient stroke will then support the engine that will be fine-tuned by strength and conditioning.”

Visit www.swimthebigblue.com to follow Ben’s progress and donate.

Main pic: from left: James McCarron, Ben Drury, Ben Hooper and Richard Collins during training for Swim the Big Blue

Edition 134: Heather MacDonald & Paul Corcoran

The commercial director of a railway software, technology and services company is to become the new chief executive of The Sheffield College.

Heather MacDonald’s seven years in post come to an end this summer, at which point she will be replaced by Paul Corcoran, from DeltaRail. He is due to start his post at the college on June 22.

He said: “I am delighted to be joining The Sheffield College to work with an outstanding team, and to continue to build on the many achievements of the current chief executive, Heather MacDonald.

“It is widely recognised that the UK needs to develop a skilled workforce to achieve sustainable economic growth.”

Paul added: “Having worked in both industry and higher education, I believe the college can play a leading role in meeting this challenge by finding innovative ways to bring together the education and training needs of both students and employers.

“Enhancing our students’ career prospects and helping employers meet their many challenges will be among my highest priorities. I have longstanding personal ties with Sheffield and am looking forward to spending more time in the city.”

Mr Corcoran has been commercial director of DeltaRail for the past six years, prior to which he held the post of director of projects for two years.

He has also held director-level positions with Amey Infrastructure Services, Amey Datel and Jasmin Plc.

He previously worked at the University of Derby during which time he was a senior lecturer in engineering and provided consultancy to industry, eventually moving into the role of head of division in electronic systems.

He graduated from Coventry Polytechnic with an honours degree in engineering, and also holds a PhD in engineering from Warwick University. He completed his MBA at Durham University.

Ms MacDonald said: “The Sheffield College plays a key role in the growth of the city region’s economy and it feels right to be handing over the role of chief executive to someone of Paul’s experience and calibre.

“I wish him every success in taking the college forward.”

Richard Wright, governors’ board chair and executive director of Sheffield Chamber of Commerce, said: “Inevitably there is a degree of mixed emotions. Heather MacDonald is leaving us after a superb period when she has steered the college through some difficult times. She goes with all our thanks and admiration.”

He added: “Paul joins us when we are being challenged by government to get closer to employers and understand their needs, to explore alternative sources of funding, and to work hard to better satisfy the needs of students and their parents by ensuring they are well set up for a life in employment as well as their future studies.

“Paul brings a different perspective and set of skills to the college, having come from a higher education background and worked successfully in a commercial environment for many years. We believe he is very well equipped to lead us on this.”

 

Your FE & skills General Election questions answered — part three: Liberal Democrats

The Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats have all come in for grilling with a host of questions from FE and skills figures.

In this last of three articles, a spokesperson for Nick Clegg’s (pictured) Liberal Democrats takes the stand to answer your questions.

Business, Enterprise and Energy Minister Matthew Hancock answered yesterday for the Conservatives, while Shadow Skills Minister Liam Byrne responded for Labour this morning.

 

Will FE be funded at all in the future — if so for what?

Yes – a vibrant FE sector is vital to the future of the economy and individual life chances.  Liberal Democrats will protect the education budget in real terms – including schools, colleges and 16-19 education – as we have done for schools in this parliament.

Will colleges be appropriately funded to deliver English and maths?

We recognise the pressures colleges have experienced as government completed the difficult but necessary task of balancing the books.  That is why we want to protect the Department for Education’s 16-19 budget, to ensure colleges have the resources they need.

How do you envisage the provision for learners requiring “second chances “if students have not succeeded in the school system?

In a globalised world, where technology moves fast and industries can be transformed overnight, we also need to establish lifelong learning for all. No-one should expect to study just once in their adult life: we should be helping everyone to reach their full potential rather than writing people off.
Liberal Democrats will improve provision of independent careers information, including through job centres for people seeking new options later in life.  We will also introduce lifelong learning accounts to give people more control over their learning, and set up a cross-party commission to secure a long-term settlement for the public funding of re-skilling and lifelong learning.

Are you going to address tax avoidance?

Yes. In coalition we have fought to make the tax system fairer – cutting income tax for millions of people on low and middle incomes while clamping down on tax avoidance.  We have made huge progress, but there is still a minority of wealthy individuals and companies who actively seek to avoid paying their fair share. This cannot be right.  We will aim to raise an extra £6bn by 2017/18, by taking tough action against corporate tax evasion and abusive avoidance strategies.

What would you do to ensure that government funded training leads directly to a job outcome?

The most important thing to ensure is that there are jobs available.  Under a Liberal Democrat Business Secretary, this coalition has an excellent record on creating jobs in the private sector.  But we need to finish the job off of fixing the economy.  We will balance the books but in a way that is fair – without decimating public services.
However, we also recognise the importance of matching skill sets to job opportunities which is why we would develop National Colleges as national centres of expertise.  These colleges would identify a need for certain skill areas, such as renewable energy and then the college would deliver high level vocational skills to match businesses needs in that area.

What are you going to do to make sure schools are giving young people the information about apprenticeships?

Over 2m apprenticeships have been created since 2010, with 53 per cent of them going to women. But we wish to create more which is why we will improve provision of independent careers information, advice and guidance for all. Making sure young people are receiving all the information they need to make the right choice for them.

How are you going to address the relationship between university qualifications and vocational qualifications and make sure their contribution to the economy is equally recognised?

By increasing the quality, the number and the industries apprenticeships are available they will gradually gain parity with university qualifications.  Employers, government and schools need to work together to promote the opportunities apprenticeships offer.

What are you going to do to help support young people who have found themselves in difficult situations with the law or unemployment to turn their lives around and get into jobs?

We need to be investing in children when they are young rather than picking up the pieces when they are older.  We will protect the schools budget and drive up quality in the early years. Our pupil premium, taken from the front page of our last manifesto, has got £2.5bn into schools to support the children who need extra help.

How does Government plan to better help employers financially to achieve its plan to place all school leavers, without a job or college place, into an apprenticeship?

We will extend the Apprenticeship Grant for Employers for the remainder of the next Parliament.

What does the Government intend doing to help build better relations between schools and businesses, in order to prepare school leavers for the workplace?

It’s no secret that Liberal Democrats have clashed with Michael Gove on the provision of careers advice.  Put simply, children and young people won’t know what opportunities are out there if no one tells them.  Businesses have an important role to play – and need to be part of an ongoing dialogue with schools particularly on skills, work experience and careers advice. Our new careers body puts businesses in the lead – to make sure they are contributing to careers advice and making sure that advice properly reflects the world of work.

What will you do to break the current ‘top down’ nature of the skills funding system, to put more power in the hands of the customer (employers)?

We have sought to address this through apprenticeship funding which goes directly to the employer.

What will you do to overcome the inherent mismatch between young people’s career aspirations and the skills needs of industry?

It is essential that young people are given good, impartial advice so they are able to make informed decisions. A Liberal Democrat government will push to create more apprenticeships in more industries, such as the creative and digital industries, so that young people have a range of opportunities open to them.
We will also work to link skills and jobs together by making National Colleges centres for expertise. Where there is demand we will create colleges which focus on a particular industry, such as renewable energy, with the college delivering high level vocational skills for that sector.

What will you do to make apprenticeships and higher level apprenticeships the educational pathway of choice?

Over 2 m apprenticeships have been created since 2010, we of course want this number to continue to rise in the next parliament. Making young people aware of the opportunities which arise from doing apprenticeships involves giving them excellent independent career advice so they can make the right decision based on their skill set. 

Rather than put increasing pressure on colleges and independent providers to improve the English and mathematics skills of our young people, how are you going to address the poor teaching in schools that is the main reason for the problem?

We completely agree that the best way to improve education is to start early.  Education will continue to be the Liberal Democrats’ priority in the next parliament.  We will protect the education budget in real terms from early years to 19 and an aim to eradicate illiteracy and innumeracy by 2025.
We will invest in the early years, and allow early years staff to work towards Qualified Teacher Status.  We will maintain our Pupil Premium – which has been one of the coalition’s most important policies and came straight from the front page of the last Liberal Democrat manifesto. This gets extra money to the children who need the most help, ensuring teachers have the resources they need to support these children.
We want to see a new Royal College of Teaching to drive improvement and spread best practice on what works; will increase the number of teaching schools, and raise the bar on entry to the profession.  Finally, we will also guarantee that all teachers in state funded schools will hold Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) or be working towards it.

What are you going to do about ensuring independent careers advice?

We will improve provision of independent careers information, advice and guidance for all, including through job centres for people seeking new options later in life.  We want to see careers advice driven by local employers working closely with schools – and a focus on raising children’s aspirations through initiatives like Speakers for Schools.

To bring back respect for politicians should MPs not be allowed to have a ‘second job’ and should their salaries simply be linked to the cost of living index like so many others are?

We absolutely believe that our MP’s core focus is to represent the constituents they are elected to serve.  MP’s salaries are now considered by an independent body and MP’s rightly have no involvement in how their salary is set.

What effect has raising the school leaving age had on young people not in education, training or employment?

The education leaving age has now risen to 18, but the entitlement to support for school transport now ends at 16. Bursary payments are not always enough to cover rising bus fares.
Some young people are finding it expensive to access education, apprenticeships and employment, and for many parents the travel costs are a huge burden too.  We will introduce a new Young Person’s Discount Card, for all young people aged 16-21, giving an automatic 2/3rds discount on bus travel. This will assist all bus users by helping to maintain the viability of existing bus routes and making it easier to open new ones.
We will also enable government departments, local councils and private businesses to add discount offers to the Young Person’s Discount Card.

What’s the best and worst thing about being a politician?

The best thing about being in politics is seeing the policies and causes you champion become reality.  After years in opposition, long standing policies like the raising of the tax free allowance, the pupil premium, early years expansion, more apprenticeships, equal marriage, investment in mental health and shared parental leave have now happened – because Liberal Democrats are in government.
The worst thing is seeing the threat to liberal values from populist parties like UKIP, feeding on the economic difficulties of the last few years.  That is why it is so important that there is a strong, centrist Liberal Democrat voice in the next parliament.

How are you going to make sure that opportunities for adults to change or develop their careers don’t decline due to lack of funding?

We will introduce lifelong learning accounts to give learners more control over public   investment in their learning and establish a cross-party commission to secure a long-term settlement for the public funding of re-skilling and lifelong learning.

By how much would you cut the adult skills’ budget?

Liberal Democrats are clear that there should be a mixture of spending cuts and tax rises in order to balance the books.  We do not think it is right, as the Tories propose, to ask for no contribution from the super-rich and to continue cutting even once the books are balanced.  After 2018, we want to see spending on public services rise again.
We will cut less than the Conservatives and borrow less than Labour – ensuring a fairer society and a stronger economy.

What measures will you introduce to improve basic skills in the working age population?

We will introduce lifelong learning accounts to give people more control over public   investment in their learning and establish a cross-party commission to secure a long-term settlement for the public funding of re-skilling and lifelong learning.

Your FE & skills General Election questions answered — part two: Labour

The Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats have all come in for grilling with a host of questions from FE and skills figures.

In this second of three articles, Shadow Skills Minister Liam Byrne (pictured) takes the stand for Labour.

Business, Enterprise and Energy Minister Matthew Hancock answered yesterday, while a Lib Dem spokesperson fields questions later today on feweek.co.uk.

 

Will FE be funded at all in the future — if so for what?

Absolutely, and what Labour’s said is we’ll protect the 16 to 19 FE budget in real terms — now that’s worth a lot of money to FE because about £8bn is spent on 16 to 19 FE today. Protecting it in real terms up until 2018 or 19 will lift that budget by £400m so that will be a big boost. In addition to that, I want to see FE take on a big role in welfare to work provision and of course a bigger role in higher education provision too. At the moment FE is being hammered and the swiftness and the deepness of the cuts is jeopardising FE all over the country and actually we need to create in FE Institutes of Technical Excellence that really help us open new possibilities for learners, but crucially close Britain’s yawning productivity gap with our key competitors. FE is at the forefront of tackling the skills gaps that we’ve got in Britain so it’s ludicrous that FE is being cut back so far. We need stronger FE not weaker FE in years to come.

Will colleges be appropriately funded to deliver English and maths?

Yes.

How do you envisage the provision for learners requiring “second chances “ if students have not succeeded in the school system?

That’s a level of detail we’ll set out post-election.

What would you do to ensure that government-funded training leads directly to a job outcome?

The most important thing that we have to do is transform FE role in the apprenticeship delivery system in Britain, so we see FE as a much bigger part of that.  Also, if you look at our plans to introduce the future jobs fund, they would entail FE taking on a much bigger role in training provision for young people who are struggling to get into work — so in a lot of different ways we want to strengthen FE’s relationship with employers.

But then of course on top of that we’ve got to transform careers services, so reintroducing genuinely independent face-to-face careers counselling is one of the most important things that we can do to help to ensure learners are also much better informed about the relationship between training and work.

How are you going to address the relationship between university qualifications and vocational qualifications and make sure their contribution to the economy is equally recognised?

We ‘ve said that we want to bring FE and higher education closer together so we’ve said that our priority for expanding the higher education system will be technical degrees, in effect, earn while you learn degree programmes. And I envisage FE being a place that takes on a big part of the delivery of those technical degrees. The system reform we’d like to see is the creation of college partnerships with FE and higher education working much more closely together in a way that’s quite similar to the American community college partnership model.

What are you going to do to support skills competitions and help continue the great work they do for young people who are involved with them?

WorldSkills is just extraordinary. It’s been just a huge privilege to watch it grow over the last few years. We think that the future model of careers services needs include a big element of inspiration, so that the work that the Skills Show and WorldSkills do is developed and supported and I hope in a way that is much stronger regionally than nationally.

How will you support the FE Sector to generate more income to replace the 24 per cent reduction in adult skills budgets?

We think that skills budgets should be determined much more locally, so the local city regions and combined local authorities have got a much bigger role in shaping the way that skills provision is shaped and the way the skills budget is spent. That would allow you to tailor budgets much more closely to regional needs but in addition if we expand the role of FE in higher education you’ve actually got quite an ambitious growth plan for FE underpinned by real-terms protection.

What will you do to overcome the inherent mismatch between young people’s career aspirations and the skills needs of industry?

We need to start much earlier — the reintroduction of face-to-face careers advice will be one of the big changes that we want to make. You’ve got to get businesses much more involved in ITPs and I want to JCPs do their part too because ultimately JCPs are sitting on top of lots of Labour market information that’s not currently shared with the country or young people.

What measures will you introduce to improve basic skills in the working age population?*

I’m afraid the adult education budget has been left in such a mess by this government we’re going to need a pretty wide-ranging review of the way that we reboot adult skills provision in Britain and that is something that we’re only going to be able to do in office.

*A number of questions were not posed due to timing constraints

Lib Dems pledge 16 to 19 funding boost in budget protection plan

Funding for 16 to 19-year-olds would receive a boost under Liberal Democrat plans to budget for rising learner numbers, the party has claimed.

The Lib Dems are due to launch their manifesto this morning. It includes a pledge to protect the education budget for two to 19-year-olds in real terms, including an allowance for rising learner numbers, which the party claims will mean a budget £2.5bn larger than Labour’s and £5bn larger than the Tories’.

Speaking at a launch in London, Deputy Prime Minister is expected claim that his is the “party of education”, and say that the manifesto is a “blueprint for a stronger economy and fairer society”.

He will add: “We want to ensure that every child, no matter where they are born, the colour of their skin, or how rich their parents are, has the same opportunity to reach their potential is.

“At the last election, protecting schools spending and investing huge amounts of extra money towards the poorest pupils was one of our top priorities. I am immensely proud that we did just that in government. But we won’t rest there.”

In their pledge, the Lib Dems are vowing to protect spending on two to 19-year-olds in real terms until 2017/18, when they hope to eradicate the cyclically-adjusted current budget deficit, and then increase education spending in line with economic growth. The pledge allows for a forecast increase in pupils of around 460,000 by 2020.

A party spokesperson said: “This year the two to 19-year-old education budget is £49.2bn. We will increase it to £55.3bn by 2020, the same level of funding required to protect per pupil funding in 2020.”

The spokesperson claimed that Tory plans to freeze spending for five to 16-year-olds at its current level, leading to a cut in real terms and the threat of further slices from unprotected education budgets, would mean overall spending of £5bn less than the Lib Dems by 2020.

It said Labour, despite a protection for the whole education budget, had not allowed for the pupil numbers increase and would therefore spend £2.5bn less than the Lib Dems in the same period.