Dozens of National Apprenticeship Awards winners announced in ceremonies across England

[slideshow_deploy id=’40567′]

Dozens of high achieving apprentices and employers have been recognised at National Apprenticeship Awards ceremonies across England.

The events for London (pictured above), the South West, North West (including Liverpool, Cumbria and Lancashire), Yorkshire and the Humber, West Midlands, and North East took place between Thursday (October 8) and yesterday (October 15).

It is understood that awards and special commendations went to 47 apprentices and 53 employers.

Speaking after the North East ceremony at the Discovery Museum, in Newcastle, yesterday, Skills Minister Nick Boles said: “From local businesses to large household names, from intermediate to degree apprentices, all of today’s winners truly deserve this recognition.

“The success of each winner reminds us of how crucial apprenticeships are in supporting our workforce, our businesses and our economy.

“This is why we are committed to delivering 3m apprenticeships by 2020.”

The awards celebrate the success of the country’s highest achieving apprentices and apprenticeship employers.

More outstanding apprentices and employers will be recognised in ceremonies for the South East, on Wednesday (October 21), North West (including Manchester, Cheshire and Staffordshire), on Thursday (October 22), Thames Valley and Solent, on Thursday (October 22), East of England, on Tuesday (October 27), and East Midlands, on Thursday (October 29).

Sue Husband, director of the National Apprenticeship Service, said that the awards, now in their 12th year, “enable talented apprentices and committed employers to receive the recognition they richly deserve”.

“They not only help celebrate the achievements of apprentices and businesses, allowing them to gain the credit for investing in their own futures, but they drive up quality and encourage others to get involved,” she added.

Here are the winners and highly commended entries:

Yorkshire and the Humber
Winners:
McDonald’s Award for Intermediate Apprentice of the Year: Karolina Polniaszek, Superdrug
EAL Award for Advanced Apprentice of the Year: April Bell, Monica F Hewitt
City & Guilds Apprenticeship Champion of the Year: Martin Kennedy, Portakabin Ltd
The E.ON in partnership with the National Skills Academy for Power Award for Medium Employer of the Year: Genix Healthcare Ltd
BAE Systems Award for Large Employer of the Year: Portakabin Ltd
BT Award for Macro Employer of the Year: Lloyds Banking Group
EDF Energy Award for Newcomer SME of the Year: Sheffield Media and Exhibition Centre Limited

Highly Commended:
Kathrine Rundell, Third Energy UK Gas Ltd
Ruby Magson, Hemingway Bailey
Matthew Weeks, Bluefin Insurance Services
Yorkshire Coast Homes
Margaret & Michael Naylor & Associates
Wakefield Council
Yorkshire WaterHull City Council

West Midlands
Winners:
Mcdonald’s Award for Intermediate Apprentice of the Year: Kathleen Sandford, the Community Housing Group
EAL Award for Advanced Apprentice of the Year: Joshua White, IBM
The Nuclear Decommissioning Site Licence Companies Award for the Higher Apprentice of the Year: Stephanie Palmer, Fujitsu
Unilever Small Employer of the Year: ISO Quality Services Ltd
BAE Systems Award for Large Employer of the Year: Redrow Homes
BT Award for Macro Employer of the Year: Compass Group UK & Ireland
EDF Energy Award for Newcomer SME of the Year: eTech Solutions Ltd
Rolls-Royce Award for Newcomer Large Employer of the Year: Highways England

Highly Commended:
Bethany Griffin, Sanctuary Housing Association
Ryan Shemwell, Green Lighting Ltd.
Hannah Scott, Jaguar Landrover
Andrew Morley, Jaguar Landrover
Green Lighting Ltd
The Community Housing Group
The Landscape Group
Jaguar Land Rover ltd
Halfords Ltd (Retail)
Black Country Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

North West
Winners:
McDonald’s Award for Intermediate Apprentice of the Year: Adam Huddleston, Dr Oetker UK Ltd
EAL Award for Advanced Apprentice of the Year: Paul Haynes, BAE Systems (Submarines)
The Nuclear Decommissioning Site Licence Companies Award for the Higher Apprentice of the Year: Joanne Sharples, BAE Systems
City & Guilds Apprenticeship Champion of the Year: Poppy Wolfarth, Asset Training and Consultancy Ltd
Unilever Small Employer of the Year: Prima Software Ltd
The E.ON in partnership with the National Skills Academy for Power Award for Medium Employer of the Year: A & G Precision and Sons Ltd.
BAE Systems Award for Large Employer of the Year: Silentnight Brands
BT Award for Macro Employer of the Year: Sellafield Ltd
EDF Energy Award for Newcomer SME of the Year: Driscolls Antiques Ltd

Highly Commended:
Jacqueline Whitehead, Plus Dane Group
India Ratcliffe, Loungy Upholstery Ltd, Craig Eccles, Paradigm Precision
Natassia Sinclair, Weightmans LLP
Hannah Bell, GlaxoSmithKline
Natalie Roberts, Merseyside Police
Liam Hogan, Cathy at Image Hair and Beauty
Arthur Padgett Limited
Weightmans LLP
Unilever UK Limited
Aintree University Hospital
Eden Rivers Trust

South West
Winners:
McDonald’s Award for Intermediate Apprentice of the Year: Odette Carroll, Brunelcare
EAL Award for Advanced Apprentice of the Year: Jonathan Taylor, Alcoa Power & Propulsion
The Nuclear Decommissioning Site Licence Companies Award for the Higher Apprentice of the Year: Malgorzata Barzowska, level 3, Airbus UK
City & Guilds Apprenticeship Champion of the Year: Hayley Barnden, Defence Equipment and Support, Ministry of Defence
Unilever Small Employer of the Year: Beauty Oasis Spa
The E.ON in partnership with the National Skills Academy for Power Award for Medium Employer of the Year: River Cottage Ltd
BAE Systems Award for Large Employer of the Year: South West Water Limited
EDF Energy Award for Newcomer SME of the Year: Vector 7

Highly Commended:
Meghan Callaghan, L J Boyce Ltd
Jessica Herbert, Rolls Royce Plc
Tom Heal, ME and WJ Heal
Andrew Cooper, GKN Aerospace
The Seafood Restaurant
Plymouth City Council

London
Winners:
McDonald’s Award for Intermediate Apprentice of the Year: Maria Dare-Ojo, Compass Group UK and Ireland LTD
EAL Award for Advanced Apprentice of the Year: Lauren Tiller, BT
The Nuclear Decommissioning Site Licence Companies Award for the Higher Apprentice of the Year: Sean Norgate, BT
City & Guilds Apprenticeship Champion of the Year: Joshua Uwadiae, eCourier
BAE Systems Award for Large Employer of the Year: Breyer Group plc
Rolls-Royce Award for Newcomer Large Employer of the Year: UBS Wealth Management
The E.ON in partnership with the National Skills Academy for Power Award for Medium Employer of the Year: Troup Bywaters + Anders
BT Award for Macro Employer of the Year: BAE Systems Plc
Unilever Small Employer of the Year: Keybridge IT Solutions

Highly Commended:
James Manning, ASDA Home Shopping Centre
Aaron Barrett, Breyer Group Plc
Naim Hamade, BT
Gabriele Power, Channel 4 Television Corporation
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Lancaster London
Barclays Bank plc
IBM UK Ltd.
Sweett Group PLC
Haymarket Media

North East
Winners:
McDonald’s Award for Intermediate Apprentice of the Year: Ryan Davies, South Tees -Hospitals NHS Trust
EAL Award for Advanced Apprentice of the Year: Matthew Collins, Proctor and Gamble
The Nuclear Decommissioning Site Licence Companies Award for the Higher Apprentice of the Year: Nathan Charrada, Proctor and Gamble
City & Guilds Award for Apprenticeship Champion of the Year: George Ritchie MBE, PX Limited
EON and The National Skills Academy for Power Award for Medium Employer of the Year: Sotech Limited
BAE Systems Award for Large Employer of the Year: Gestamp

EDF Energy Award for Newcomer SME of the Year: PROPS North East

Highly Commended:
Ryan Hepple, TW Steam and Heating Ltd
Victoria English, Caterpillar Peterlee Ltd
Bethany Cross, Northumberland Fire and Rescue
Stephen Gowland, Ils solicitors
Caterpillar Peterlee Ltd

 

 

 

 

Edition 151: Movers and Shakers

Ellen Thinnesen will be the new principal of Sunderland College come the New Year, following the retirement of Anne Isherwood.

Ms Thinnesen will arrive from Tameside College where she was deputy principal. Prior to this, she held various senior management and teaching roles at Grimsby Institute of Further and Higher Education.

Ms Thinnesen said she felt “honoured” to be joining Sunderland College.

“The organisation already has an excellent reputation for the quality of its teaching and learning and I’m looking forward to working with the staff, students and governors to build upon this,” she added.

“There are some exciting times ahead with the opening of the college’s new £29m City Campus, which will provide our students with the highest quality learning environment and I’m delighted to be leading the college into its next stage of development.”

Rob Lawson, chair of governors for Sunderland College, said the board were “delighted” with the appointment of Ms Thinnesen and thanked outgoing principal Ms Isherwood for her three years of service as principal.

“She [Ms Isherwood] has overseen the development of the new £22m Sports and Arts Academies at Bede Campus, played an instrumental role in securing the development of our City Campus and built upon the college’s core strength of teaching and learning,” he said.

Meanwhile, training provider Qube Learning has appointed funding and compliance specialist David Hawkins of SRF Consultancy as their new quality and compliance director.

Mr Hawkins has spent more than 16 years at SRF where he advised colleges and independent providers.

He said he “couldn’t be more pleased” to have joined the Qube executive team.

“Qube are an organisation that I have always enjoyed working with and share my values of having the learner experience at the heart of operations,” he said.

“It’s too easy today for observers to knock apprenticeships from a distance without understanding the immense effort and skill it takes on behalf of learners and providers in order to achieve, whereas Qube are able to celebrate the learner journey.

“I’m very much looking forward to helping the organisation continue to grow and make a difference to the apprentices and learners they develop.”

And, Jason Gunningham, head of sport, outdoor education and public services at Bridgwater College, has been appointed to the national committee of the England Colleges Football Association (ECFA) by the Association of Colleges Sport.

The role will see Mr Gunningham help support and shape the various initiatives being planned by the ECFA to “enhance and develop” football provision within FE.

Mr Gunningham said: “I am extremely honoured to have been asked to apply and then accepted onto the ECFA national committee.

“The initiatives aim to increase the participation, quality and breadth of offer that colleges can deliver within their own institutions, and obviously this allows me to transfer best practice throughout the country to our own award winning provision, here at Bridgwater College.”

New subcontracting audits requirement questioned by Association of Colleges

A new Skills Funding Agency (SFA) requirement for lead contractors to pay for an external audit of their subcontracting arrangements will “create the need for hundreds of additional reports,” Association of Colleges assistant chief executive Julian Gravatt (pictured) has warned.

He said the requirement, contained in funding agreements for 2015/16 and requesting ‘annual subcontracting assurance,’ was already carried out internally by providers as “good practice”.

A notice has been sent by the SFA to lead providers about the new clause, which requires lead providers that “subcontract more than a defined level of provision to obtain a report from an external auditor that provides assurance on the arrangements in place to manage and control their subcontractors”.

Lead providers must also provide “a certificate confirming that the report provides satisfactory assurance,” according to the notice, which has not been sent to subcontractors but is available on feweek.co.uk.

“It is good practice for college audit committees to get an internal auditor to look at their education and training subcontracts, but it is not necessary for the SFA to be so prescriptive on the issue,” said Mr Gravatt.

He added the new clause would “create the need for hundreds of additional reports for colleges and larger training providers”.

Policy Consortium member and Institute of Education senior research associate Mick Fletcher said: “It seems to me to be another example of passing a job and the associated costs to providers because the SFA no longer has the resources to provide proper oversight of the sector.

“Lead providers will no doubt pass the extra cost to their subcontractors and ultimately it will come out of resources intended for learners — there is nowhere else.

“Meanwhile, the government will continue to claim that cutting ‘back office’ staff at the SFA doesn’t affect the front line.”

And Association of Employment and Learning Providers chief executive Stewart Segal also questioned the need for the new clause.

“The external assurance can be integrated into the existing assurance process, including financial and process audits, and we believe

it should not add significant costs to the process,” he said.

“We will continue to discuss the implementation of these new requirements with the SFA.”

The SFA declin declined to comment on criticism of the new clause. It is understood that information in the notice will be incorporated into future published guidance.

Apprenticeship exam costs concern at CBI as AELP issues ‘don’t start Trailblazers without fees info’ warning

  • CBI calls for ‘clarity’ on Trailblazer assessments

  • AELP warns against new starts without knowing costs

 

The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has hit out over fears that companies and providers could be hit by costly new apprenticeship exams with big awarding organisations (AOs) yet to say what they’ll charge.

In an exclusive interview with FE Week Neil Carberry (pictured above left), CBI director for employment and skills, said businesses had been increasingly concerned about rumoured end-point assessment costs.

Three AOs have so far been approved by the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) but none has so far set a price.

And Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) chief executive Stewart Segal (pictured above right) has gone even further and cautioned members, saying they “should be aware of the cost of assessment before they take on any new starts”.

Mr Carberry said: “What is important is giving businesses and providers clarity as soon as possible on the new assessment system and associated costs.

“Companies are concerned that assessment costs for trailblazers are proportionate.

“We have been getting more worried that government inspired end assessment criteria are driving up costs for trailblazers.”

It comes with provisional government figures this month showing 400 starts under the new standards in 2014/15.

Each Trailblazer group has to include an estimate of costs when they submit their assessment plans — but this information is not published.

However, a number of published assessment plans include some reference to potential costs.

The level three electrician standard includes an AM2 test which “will be approximately £700”.

Meanwhile, the Tech Partnership, the employer-led network behind both the network engineer and software developer Trailblazer apprenticeships said in its assessment plan that “our aim is that assessment costs will be 10 to 15 per cent of the total cost of the apprenticeship”. This would give a “direct cost of assessment of three days of assessor per apprentice”.

Terry Fennell, group operations director at the Food and Drink Training and Education Council Group of Companies, told FE Week that the Butchery Employer Trailblazer group had estimated the end point assessment cost for the butcher standard to be around £600.

Despite the uncertainty over assessment fees, providers are expected to include costs when claiming funding from the SFA.

A City and Guilds spokesperson told FE Week: “We are still working with trailblazer groups to decide the pricing structure for end assessment apprenticeships.”

A spokesperson for Pearson said it was “too early at this point” to have information about how much they would charge.

An OCR spokesperson said: “It’s too early to say what OCR will be charging as nothing has been finalised.”


 

Editor’s comment

I agree with Stewart

This week Sajid Javid, the Secretary of State at the Department for Innovation and Skills (BIS), told the select committee he felt it necessary to support the introduction of an apprenticeship levy because the new ‘higher quality’ standards were more expensive than the current frameworks.

Cheap portfolios with tick box assessor observations are out, to be replaced in many cases by attendance at an approved test centre.

This new end point assessment, in the case of the network engineer standard for example, will last a full week at a test centre.

Significantly upping the cost of assessment isn’t necessarily a bad thing. If employers see a real value from any corresponding increase in the quality of training and rigor of assessment to achieve a pass, merit or distinction.

But it raises some important questions, such as; how can providers responsibly negotiate fees with employers if they don’t know the cost of assessment? If only one assessment organisation gets approved for a standard what is their incentive to offer a competitive price? And, who will pay for the apprentice travel and accommodation for assessment centres and who will pay for expensive assessment resists if the learner fails to attend or pass?

Steward Segal, the chief executive of the AELP, is right.

Providers need to down their trailblazer tools and stick to the current frameworks until these questions are answered.

Chris Henwood
FE Week editor
chris.henwood@feweeek.co.uk


Click here to download Nick Linford’s Trailblazer funding slides, presented at the AELP Autumn Conference

London Mayor Boris leading London area FE review

Boris Johnson (pictured) has been given a key role in deciding the future of London’s FE colleges, FE Week can reveal.

The London mayor will, it is understood, lead the capital’s post-16 education area review, which is yet to be officially announced.

A City Hall spokesperson told FE Week that Mr Johnson, who is also the MP for Uxbridge and South Ruislip, had already taken a leading role in preparations for the review.

He said: “The mayor is working with borough leaders, government and the skills sector, using the area review process to help deliver our vision to strengthen post-16 skills and education in London.

“It is vitally important that businesses can access workers with the right knowledge and skills if the capital is to maintain its current strong position as a global hub for business, talent and creativity.”

The government has said the reviews were “designed to achieve a transition towards fewer, larger, more resilient and efficient providers, and more effective collaboration across institution types”.

It announced the second lot of the first round of reviews on September 25, involving 21 general FE colleges and 13 sixth forms colleges (SFCs) in the Tees Valley, Sussex Coast and Solent regions.

Twenty two general FE colleges and 16 SFCs were announced in the first round of reviews for Birmingham and Solihull, Greater Manchester and the Sheffield City region, announced on September 8.

College governors’ board chairs, joined by either their chief executives or principals, and officials from local authorities take part in each steering group.

Members of local enterprise partnerships (Leps), the FE Commissioner, the Sixth Form College Commissioner and Regional Schools Commissioners, and Department for Education and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) officials will also attend.

The Greater Manchester group chair is chief executive of Trafford City Council Theresa Grant, but FE Commissioner Dr David Collins is chairing the five other steering groups.

It is understood Mr Johnson will be working with London Borough leaders in his role. There will be little opportunity for delay, with his term of office set to end in May.

The government has said that more area reviews would be announced “shortly”.

However, a BIS spokesperson declined to comment on when the London area review would be announced, or how many general FE and SFCs would be involved.

‘Boost FE with higher education cash’ report from Policy Exchange due

The government is expected to face calls to boost FE budgets with funding from the higher education sector in a new report.

The Policy Exchange is due to publish its report on Monday (October 19) and it is thought the conclusions will include a rebalancing of government finances towards the two sectors.

It comes after Jonathan Simons, head of education at the right-leaning think-tank, which counts Skills Minister Nick Boles as founder, said the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) should divert cash from universities to help FE, which is “falling over”.

In an exclusive interview with FE Week, and expanding on his above comments from the Northern Rocks pedagogy conference in Leeds in June, he said the government needed to ensure value for money for “all students, regardless of what route they take”.

Mr Simons said: “In advance of a challenging spending review, we need to think hard about how we best spend all available government funds. When it comes to post-secondary education, the field is currently skewed in favour of higher education.”

The Skills Funding Agency announced in July that FE providers faced a cut of 3.9 per cent on their non-apprenticeship adult skills budgets between August and March 2016.

It came on top of cuts of up to 24 per cent already made to adult skills budgets earlier this year.

Mr Simons said: “When the adult skills budget is being cut by 24 per cent in 2015/16, and at the same time the higher education sector reports discretionary reserves for 2013/14 equivalent to just under half of their entire annual income, I’d expect BIS to think hard and work with colleges, universities, employers and training providers to ensure value for money in education for all students after the age of 18, regardless of what route they take and which qualifications they study.”

A BIS spokesperson said: “Any funding decisions will be made following the spending review.”

Mr Simons’ comments come with the adult skills budget having been cut by 24 per cent since 2009-10. And, according to the National Audit Office, more than one-in-four of the entire FE college network could effectively go bankrupt within 12 months.

Image: cartoon from edition 142 of FE Week

Post-16 education and training area review anounced for West Yorkshire

Seven general FE colleges and four sixth form colleges (SFCs) will be involved in a post-16 education and training area review for West Yorkshire announced by the government this morning.

It is set to launch on November 16 and West Yorkshire will be the seventh and final English region involved in the first wave of such area reviews, a Department for Business, Innovation and Skills spokesperson said.

It comes after the government announced that 43 general FE colleges and 29 SFCs would be included in reviews for the Tees Valley, Sussex Coast, Solent, Birmingham and Solihull, Greater Manchester, and Sheffield city areas.

Skills Minister Nick Boles said this morning: “We are developing an FE system which creates a productive, innovative and competitive workforce for the 21st century.

“This review will support the hard work of FE teachers and lecturers in the West Yorkshire area, and give local people and businesses a greater say over how and what young people are taught.”

The chair for the West Yorkshire steering group, which will hold its first meeting on Monday November 16, has yet to be announced.

Just like the six area reviews previously announced, West Yorkshire’s will not directly involve any school sixth forms or independent learning providers.

It comes as FE Week has revealed today that London Mayor Boris Johnson will play a leading role in the London area review, details of which are yet to be announced.

There was previous criticism from sector leaders last month over the reviews not directly including school and academy post-16 providers.

They included James Kewin, deputy chief executive of the Sixth Form Colleges Association, who told FE Week: “A genuine process of area based reviews would be extremely welcome, as it would scrutinise the performance and viability of all 16 to 19 providers — including school and academy sixth forms.”

There was further criticism, reported in FE Week on October 2, that the steering groups for the area reviews already announced were “unwieldy”, with numbers per group potentially swelling to 45.

Each review will start with an assessment of the economic and educational needs of the area, and the implications for post-16 education and training provision, also including school sixth forms and independent learning providers.

The reviews will then focus on the current structure of FE and SFCs, although a BIS spokesperson has previously told FE Week that “there will be opportunities for other institutions (including schools and independent providers) to opt in to this stage of the analysis”.

The first group of area reviews to be announced, as reported in FE Week on September 8, covered 22 FE colleges and 16 SFCs in Birmingham and Solihull, Greater Manchester, and Sheffield. More reviews, involving 21 FE colleges and 13 SFCs, were announced on September 25 for the Tees Valley, Sussex Coast and Solent regions.

The colleges involved in the latest review are yet to comment.

Here are the colleges involved in the West Yorkshire area review announced by the government:

FE Colleges

Bradford College

Calderdale College

Kirklees College

Leeds City College

Leeds College of Building

Shipley College

Wakefield College

Sixth form colleges

Greenhead College

Huddersfield New College

New College Pontefract

Notre Dame Catholic Sixth Form College

Apprenticeship levy plans may be better as ‘nuclear’ deterrent, says top Oxford University academic

A senior academic has said apprenticeship levy plans were like a “nuclear weapon — it may be worth threatening you are going to use it more than actually use it.”

Professor Ewart Keep (pictured below right), director of Oxford University’s centre on skills, had told the House of Lords Social Mobility Committee he was “very surprised” by the government announcement in June of plans for the apprenticeship levy.Professor-Ewart-Keep-during-the-committee-hearingwp2

He said: “What worries me is with firms that have not previously had apprenticeships before, but will fall inside levy payments — certain sorts of private training providers will say to them, you are now paying the levy, let’s see how we can work with you to gain the system to get some of your money back for training that you might have been doing anyway.”

Professor Keep added: “I fear that, particularly as it is really tied to the government’s 3m apprenticeship target [by 2020], what we will see is quality will be sacrificed for quantity.

“My general expectation is that when push comes to shove and there is any indication that the target won’t be met, quality will get traded off.”

Professor Keep’s comments to the committee, which is investigating the transition between school and work and its impact on social mobility, follow widespread sector concerns about apprenticeship quality as reported in FE Week.

Such concerns have been raised, for example, by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills consultation on the proposed levy, which raised the possibility of allowing employers to use providers not subject to an approval system or even Ofsted inspections.

And although Skills Minister Nick Boles has outlined his view that employers’ apprenticeship levy money could only be spent on Skills  Funding Agency-registered providers, and that Ofsted would have a continued role in inspecting them, his shadow, Gordon Marsden, has also expressed concern about falling apprenticeship success rates.

Tanith-Dodge,-HR-director-at-Marks-and-Spencerwp2However, Tanith Dodge (pictured left), HR director at Marks and Spencer, told the committee on Wednesday, October 14, that there was a “naivety among young people about the opportunities out there [for vocational training].”

“The whole process of applying is so important. Employers have got a big responsibility to help young people with feedback [if they don’t get on an apprenticeship] for future applications,” she said.

Nick Chambers, director of the Education and Employers Taskforce charity, agreed that “more could be done with applications for apprenticeships”.

“A lot more are going to older workers and not younger people,” he said. “Things like helping [young people] with a mock interview or a CV can make a real difference.”

Emma Codd, managing partner for talent at Deloitte, also said during the hearing: “Businesses have to put in the time to show people who go in at level two how they can progress [to higher level apprenticeships].”

The committee is expected to have at least two further evidence sessions — on October 21 and 28 — before reporting its findings by March 23.

Witnesses for future evidence sessions are yet to be announced.

Learning opportunities ‘detrimental’ to small business productivity

The difficulty faced by small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in running apprenticeships was raised with members of the House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Select Committee.

Stephen Ibbotson, director of business at the Institute of Chartered Accountants, told the committee, which held its first evidence session, chaired by Hartlepool MP Iain Wright (pictured above) looking at the government’s Productivity Plan on Tuesday (October 13), that SMEs were generally supportive of apprenticeships.

But, he said, for others, getting an apprentice “can be detrimental to productivity because it takes experienced people to work with them, and they also sometimes struggle to get the calibre of apprentice they want”.

The Productivity Plan outlines, among other things, a number of apprenticeship-related measures including the large employers’ levy and employment targets for public sector bodies in order to increase skills.

However, Allan Cook, ATKINS chairman and vice president of the Royal Academy Engineering, told committee MPs that — while apprenticeships were a “big part of the solution” to the skills shortage in engineering — businesses, and particularly SMEs, found it very difficult to navigate the different government initiatives.

“The coordination that has to exist between education — FE, higher education — and industry, helped by the government, is absolutely essential. It has to be a holistic approach,” he said.

Miguel Coelho, fellow, Institute for Government, expressed concerned over the government’s focus on apprenticeship targets.

“The quantity seems to have been one of the persistent problems we’ve had over the years — a focus on quantity and not on quality,” he said.

In contrast, he added, the evidence from countries such as Germany and Austria, which have long-standing apprenticeship programmes, “suggests that the really interesting thing about vocational education is when you have three-year degrees”.