College mergers on cards in Shrewsbury and East London

Two further mergers have been proposed for the college sector.

Shrewsbury College, Shrewsbury Sixth Form College and New College in Telford have announced plans to discuss a proposal to merge, creating a single sixth form college group.

In a joint statement, the principals of all three — Steve Wain, Martin Ward and Fiona O’Brien, respectively — said: “If a merger goes ahead we are looking at a date from August 1, 2016, and internal and external consultations will commence in early 2016.”

Meanwhile Tower Hamlets College, in East London, is exploring mergers with Redbridge College and also Hackney Community College.

Gerry McDonald
Gerry McDonald

Gerry McDonald, principal of Tower Hamlets, said: “Government policy now clearly supports the creation of larger institutions that are both financially viable and able to adapt to address the country’s skills needs.”

A Tower Hamlets spokesperson said: “It is envisaged that any merger with Redbridge would take place in advance of organisational links between Hackney Community College and Tower Hamlets College.”

He added that the Redbridge merger, if agreed, would be formally completed by August.

It comes with the post-16 education area reviews expected to result in a number of mergers.

Such moves are already on the cards for New College Nottingham and Central College Nottingham, and Greenwich Community College and Bromley College of Further and Higher Education to name but two.

Main image: Martin Ward, Fiona O’Brien and Steve Wain

Sixth Form College Commissioner Peter Mucklow shares area review load with new advisers

These are some of the faces in Sixth Form College Commissioner Peter Mucklow’s new team as he shares the growing workload of post-16 area reviews.

They include an academy trust chief executive, a former sixth form college umbrella organisation executive director, an ex-Ofsted inspector and, of course, some old sixth form college principals.

Peter Mucklow - EFA
Peter Mucklow

The six new advisers were appointed by the Department for Education on two-year contracts paying up to £600 a-day.

An Education Funding Agency spokesperson said: “The team of six will support Mr Mucklow with both the early and formal intervention process to tackle poor performance, either in terms of financial management or quality. They will also support the series of area-based reviews of provision.”

The posts were advertised in September in a joint recruitment drive with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), which was looking for deputies at £700 a-day, and advisers, at £600 a-day, for FE Commissioner Dr David Collins.

The application process for all posts ended on September 30, but a BIS spokesperson said it had not made any appointments to Dr Collins team of 11 advisers yet.

Both commissioners have chair roles in area reviews and so far seven have been announced for 83 general FE colleges and sixth form colleges across seven regions.

Mike Southworth ex Priestley
Mike Southworth

More reviews are expected to be announced soon and Mr Mucklow will be able to call on the help of Neil Hopkins (main image, left), Felicity Greeves (main image centre), Daphne King (main image right), Josephine Nowacki, along with John Boyle and Mike Southworth, whose appointments in August were previously reported by FE Week.

Mr Hopkins, a governor at Sparsholt College, was principal of Peter Symonds College for 20 years until 2013. He was then executive director of the Maple Group of sixth form colleges from 2013 to 2015.

Ms Greeves is chief executive of the Fylde Coast Academy Trust and the Fylde Coast Teaching School. She was previously principal of Blackpool Sixth Form College from 2004 to 2014.

Ms King is the former principal of East Norfolk Sixth Form College from 2012 to August 2015. She is a trustee for the Diocese of Norwich Education and Academies Trust.

And former Ofsted FE and skills inspector Ms Nowacki completes the new appointments. She worked for the education watchdog from 2003 until 2015.

She was a senior inspector for North East, Yorkshire and the Humber in her last two years at Ofsted.

FE Week cartoon from edition 147, dated Septmber 21, about the commissioner's recruitment drive
FE Week cartoon from edition 147, dated Septmber 21, about the commissioner’s recruitment drive

James Kewin, deputy chief executive of the Sixth Form Colleges’ Association, said: “We welcome the appointment of the new sixth form college advisers. All are highly regarded individuals with significant experience in the sixth form college sector.

“Although we have major concerns about the rushed implementation of the ill-conceived area review policy, we hope these advisers will help to ensure the distinct identity and ethos of sixth form colleges is not lost through the process.”

Mark Bramwell, associate director of sixth form colleges at the Association of Colleges, said: “We welcome these additional commissioners as they all have recent and extensive experience of the work of sixth form colleges.

“We are pleased to see the distinctive interests of sixth form colleges being reflected in the make-up of the area review teams.”

Live with Linford at AoC Conference 2015

Nick Linford, founder and former editor of FE Week, is out-and-about during AoC Conference 2015 bringing you all the news, gossip and fun. Stay tuned for live updates!

FE Week is proud to be a media partner and the premier news source for the FE and skills sector.

Also, register now for Nick’s free post-conference analysis and Budget predictions this Friday at 1pm (click here) and read a selection of the latest college related news and views via the links below.

College chairs’ bid to prevent Chancellor George Osborne raid on finances

More than 100 college governors’ board chairs put on a united front to Prime Minister David Cameron in a desperate bid to defend FE funding from Chancellor George Osborne and the impending Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR).

They wrote to Mr Cameron outlining the sector’s “parlous financial state that has been caused by the impact of an accumulation of funding changes that have uniquely hit colleges”.

The letter outlined the effect of cuts this year of 24 per cent and then a further 3.9 per cent, along with the 17.5 per cent reduction in funding for full-time 18-year-olds, among other issues affecting colleges.

It was signed by 127 chairs of colleges across the country and comes ahead of the CSR, which is expected on November 25.

It said in the letter: “The National Audit Office study into the sector expressed concern about its financial health, and the Education Secretary has also said the sector is financially “fragile”. Professor Alison Wolf, in her most recent research paper, commented that the sector was heading for the precipice in financial terms.”

It added: “There is a real fear that further funding cuts in the next CSR round will indeed tip us “over the precipice”. Moreover, there is an even greater fear that this could happen by accident or a lack of detailed understanding of the impact of recent decisions.

“The CSR offers an opportunity to ensure colleges can help government deliver what it aims to achieve.”

The chairs went on to issue five requests of Mr Cameron. They said they wanted “no further reduction in the quantum of adult funding” and “consistent and equitable funding for all 16 to 18-year-olds at college”.

They also said they wanted “more certainty and predictability of funding over a reasonable period of time, ideally three years” and a “re-examination of the current thinking relating to post 16 provision” along with all current and proposed post 16 providers to be included in post-16 education area reviews.

The final request was for “recognition that effective delivery of the maths and English agenda requires new and adequate resources, sufficient funding and long-term support to help recruit qualified specialist staff”.

The letter, dated October 31, concluded: “Colleges have a vital role in helping your government achieve its ambitions with regard to social cohesion, social mobility and economic success.

We are unique and responsive institutions that share these same ambitions and care deeply about our communities.

“We hope this letter clearly explains our fears and frustrations that we cannot do this as effectively as we would like and hope you will consider our concerns and our proposals which we believe will better deliver your government’s agenda.”

The Association of Colleges said it supported the letter.

Number 10 declined to comment, but confirmed the letter had been received and said that a response would be given in due course.

Concern at ‘tight’ 18-month ESF delivery timescale

Sector leaders have reacted with concern to a “tight” Skills Funding Agency (SFA) timetable for handing out £650m of delayed European Social Fund (ESF) cash — with delivery completed in just 18 months.

It was exclusively revealed on feweek. co.uk that the SFA was planning to run a “sequence of procurement” that must be finished by the end of September next year at the very latest to allow a minimum delivery period of 18 months (see timeline below right).

The delivery period, up to March 2018, was determined with ministers unable to say the SFA would oversee anything other than apprenticeships beyond then.

It follows a summer in which ESF-funded providers were forced to lay off staff amid delays in issuing 2014-202 contracts as the government sought to iron out regional devolution issues with local enterprise partnerships (Leps).

Stewart Segal, Association of Employment and Learning Providers chief executive, said: “These further delays will mean that the gaps in provision for those people who need the most help continue.

“The shortening of the timescales also means that these complex and often expensive tendering processes need to be managed effectively.esf1

“The SFA, DWP and the Leps need to work closely with the sector to make sure the tender process is clear, simple and transparent.”

He added: “We now need a clear timetable from the funding agencies to allow providers to put their bidding plans together.”

An Association of Colleges spokesperson said: “It took longer than expected to get EU sign-off for the UK ESF programme so there’s a good case for pushing ahead with procurement.

“Ideally, the government would consult on its devolution plans via a green paper so issues like this can be properly discussed in advance.”

Details of the timetable featured in a letter, leaked to FE Week, to Lep and European Structural and Investment Fund (ESIF) committees from Mike Bell, SFA deputy director for localism policy implementation.

“The attached timeline shows the tight deadlines we will have to meet so that all contracts are at least 18 months long,” he wrote.

He said the SFA would, however, introduce a “simplified procurement initiation document which will capture the required local input to be inserted into themed specification frameworks”.

“We will work … to ensure the local input fully reflects requirements as we draft the specifications so that they can be finalised and approved without any undue delay,” he wrote.

“We believe this approach enables us to ensure minimal disruption in the transition of skills budgets to localities.”

An SFA spokesperson said it had nothing to add to Mr Bell’s letter in response to timescale concerns.

Network for Black and Asian Professionals to close ‘due to lack of funding’

The Network for Black and Asian Professionals (NBAP) is to close “due to lack of funding,” FE Week can exclusively reveal.

Its chief executive, Rajinder Mann OBE (pictured above), delivered the blow to members today and said closure was the “result of the current political environment and the austerity cuts in the public sector”.

In a heartfelt letter, she wrote: “It is with deep sadness and regret that I am writing to inform you that the NBAP board has reluctantly resolved to close down the NBAP organisation and dissolve the company.”

It comes just months after Ms Mann outlined in FE Week how the NBAP was struggling financially amid question marks over the promotion in the sector of black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) principals.

The NBAP’s accounts for 2013-14, with Companies House, show that it had nearly £300k in members’ funds – down £60k on the previous year.

But, said Ms Mann, ever-tightening public purse strings meant “organisations which we have previously worked with over the past two years have not renewed their contracts, either due to their own lack of finance or not seeing the importance of positive action work for race equality”.

“Despite numerous attempts to mitigate closure by cutting our staff and costs to the bone we can no longer sustain the organisation,” she wrote.

“Over the past year we have attempted to find a partner organisation which might ensure the sustainability of our work but this has been without success, as the core issue of funding remained.”

The Wolverhampton-based organisation was set up in 1998 to address under-representation of black staff in FE, particularly in teaching, management and senior positions.

Ms Mann listed a number of achievements since then, including winning the Queens Diamond Jubilee Volunteering award for the 13-year-old Black Leadership Initiative (BLI) mentoring programme and engaging “one third of the FE sector leaders as BLI mentors”.

Ms Mann, who took over as NBAP (previously called the Network for Black Professionals) chief executive in 2013, described the closure as “hugely regrettable”.

“The NBAP has punched above its weight since 1998 and it has made a profound difference to the lives of many individuals and stakeholders, not only in the FE sector, from where it emerged, but also across a range of public, private and third sectors, including schools, universities and the Civil Service,” she wrote.

“The work has significantly increased the number of black principals, head teachers and middle managers in FE and schools over the last decade, a figure that cannot be matched in other public sector bodies.

“Most importantly over the last eighteen years, we have provided support and guidance on race issues for both individuals and organisations.”

She said the NBAP had “won hearts and minds, engaged both black and white staff across education and beyond in order to ensure that the race equality agenda was being addressed”.

“Our vision of being the collective voice for black staff providing professional development activities to unlock their talent has been significantly achieved, enabling the FE and other sectors to make progress in diversifying their workforce at all levels,” wrote Ms Mann.

“Although the NBAP will be closing, the important work on race equality has not ended.  More than ever before, there will be a continuing need to increase race awareness, to combat prejudice and to develop role models for our staff and all our learners.”

The NBAP’s final annual meeting is expected to take place at the Association of Colleges annual conference on Tuesday (November 17) at the ICC Birmingham between 2pm and 3pm.

‘We hope the DfE-appointed group will have an open mind to solutions’

If the Department for Education (DfE) wants to get more 17-year-olds onto apprenticeships then it will need to consider the role that the independent learning provider sector can play, says Stewart Segal.

In placing a focus on the development of technical and professional skills, it is good that the DfE review is of a wider set of skills than just technical skills and it should include the IT, finance, legal and managerial skills which are required across many different sectors.

The focus on getting more people on to an apprenticeship applies to all providers

In AELP’s view, the biggest skill shortage in the UK is managerial skills.

We hope the review will look carefully at the existing delivery systems and not jump to a conclusion that we need a ‘new system’.

Clearly there are improvements we can make to the current system and we know we need to encourage more people to take new routes to higher level skills but everyone in our sector knows that constant change can confuse our customers, so we need to be careful about the implementation of any ‘ground breaking reforms’. We are certainly not against change but it has to build on what works.

High quality technical and professional training is the key for both young people looking at job and career options as well as older people looking at career development.

Everyone will have a different entry point and that may be at all levels in the qualifications system. We need to ensure everyone has a chance to climb the ladder of opportunities including apprentices to give them a route to higher level skills.

For young people the routes into the world of work look complex and AELP has long proposed a stop to the constant changes to work preparation programmes and instead much more of a focus on traineeships and apprenticeships as the key routes, but not the only routes into work.

We are not sure about the target to create ‘up to 20 new specific routes’ into work or education because it sounds like a pre-conceived solution before we know what the problem is.

We hope that the DfE-appointed group will have an open mind to the solutions and that they will be customer focused and not focused on particular structures or institutions. Many different types of providers are involved in delivering technical and professional training and the solution must recognise that choice for learners and employers.

We support the option of apprenticeships as an important choice for young people and older workers looking to get the higher level skills that will move them into sustained employment.

Many young people in particular will need the support of the traineeship programme to get them their first step on the ladder.

As the DfE press release says, only 6.9 per cent of 17-year-olds take an apprenticeship which could be a lot higher if young people were given better information about their options at school.

There are many of those young people in jobs who are not apprentices and we need to ensure more of them participate in the programme.

The focus on getting more people on to an apprenticeship applies to all providers. Independent learning providers and colleges can deliver more apprenticeships, but it takes time and effort to get more employers to make the big commitment to employ an apprentice. We welcome the support of the Confederation of British Industry and the Federation of Small Businesses in doing this, but we must have a responsive contracting and funding system that supports that growth.

Many technical and professional apprenticeship programmes are delivered by partnerships of private and college providers where the college might provide some of the technical training.

These partnerships need to be recognised by the review and we will therefore want to work closely with the review group to ensure they consider all of the issues across the sector.

Future of Fisss uncertain as BIS plans new system for apprenticeship certificates

The future of the Federation for Industry Sector Skills and Standards (Fisss) was today uncertain with the government looking at a new system of issuing apprenticeship certificates.

More than 7,500 providers and 500,000 apprentices in England, Scotland and Wales work with Fisss as it verifies that programmes have been finished successfully before handing out final paperwork.

However, the position of Fisss, which has certificated nearly 320,000 apprenticeships in the last year, was put into question with the Deregulation Act 2015.

A Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) spokesperson the Act meant it was “considering options for a system for the issue of apprenticeship certificates for new approved standards”.

The Act was designed to simplify existing statutory arrangements and allow employers to design Trailblazer apprenticeship standards, with the post of Business Secretary responsible for issuing certificates — a responsibility that can be delegated.

Mark Froud (pictured above), managing director of Fisss, said: “We remain committed to ensuring high quality standards and certification with minimal bureaucracy in both the current and the new system. “We have been discussing how to achieve this going forwards with BIS and a number of Trailblazer groups, the Association of Colleges (AoC), Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP), Federation of Awarding Bodies and a number of large awarding organisations over the last year.

“In terms of the future we await decisions from the Minister.”

Teresa-Frith-e107Teresa Frith (pictured left), senior skills policy manager for the AoC, said: “We are pleased with Fisss taking a collaborative approach to the development of a new issuing system for apprenticeship certificates that will fit with the reforms and will work for colleges and other providers.”

Stewart Segal, chief executive of AELP, said: “Certification of the apprenticeship programme is an important step as part of the overall assurance process.  AELP has worked with Fisss to ensure that this is an effective and simple process.  There are still a lot of details to be resolved around the assessment plans and the systems will need to be flexible but consistent.”

The work of Fisss is funded through charging providers for the issue of certificates and Mr Froud said Fisss had been working to achieve efficiencies.

“We charge £22 per apprenticeship certificate issued under the current framework system,” he said.

“This is a 25 per cent reduction on the previous fee and saved the system and training providers over £7m in the last two and a half years.”

 

Colleges can meet new policy for young apprenticeships — but are the jobs there?

The Department for Education’s plans to get 16-year-old classroom-based vocational learners into apprenticeships after a year are assessed by Dame Asha Khemka.

Skills Minister Nick Boles’ announcement of a “ground-breaking” overhaul of technical and professional education last week represented the latest in a long line of reforms to the FE and skills sector.

The major issue with this policy agenda rests with the availability of high-quality apprenticeship places for 16 to 18-year-olds that lead to real jobs

The proposed reforms provide us with some interesting questions, perhaps some opportunities and almost certainly several challenges – not just for the sector but for government in its implementation.

The cynical view is that this is yet another erosion of colleges; that this policy is a way of diverting funding from the full-time study programme to achieve the 3m apprenticeship target, which will be challenging to meet and even harder to fund.

Apprenticeships are not inherently ‘cheaper’ in funding terms, yet around 70 per cent are currently not delivered within colleges.

Take this to its ultimate conclusion and there is a risk that college funding will be reduced — particularly if we lose our 16 to 18-year-olds to other providers from the age of 17.

Some of our young people already progress from a one-year level two course onto an apprenticeship, or leave their study programme early to pursue one — so having a system that recognises this as a valid and intentional route is no bad thing.

If the policy works as it should, then colleges will be best placed to offer that progression route. It will also enable us to extend our provision of directly-delivered apprenticeships and create opportunities for strategic relationships with more employers, providing the pipeline for their future workforce in a structured way.

Who knows, this may redress the balance and see more apprenticeships delivered by colleges within this parliament which, in turn, may well enhance the sector’s reputation with government as we become a key leader in meeting this major priority for skills. This could finally be an opportunity to create a vocational pathway that is as highly-valued as the academic.

There are, however, pitfalls. The major issue with this policy agenda rests with the availability of high-quality apprenticeship places for 16 to 18-year-olds that lead to real jobs. There seems to be an assumption that if young people want and are ready for an apprenticeship, they will be able to access one. Yet this ignores the essential ingredient — an actual vacancy.

We already know that the number of apprenticeship vacancies is the single biggest limiting factor in young people following this pathway. What will be different under these reforms to change that?

The risk is we create a two-tier system whereby the brightest progress and the rest are left behind. If the government uses some kind of financial ‘bribe’ to encourage employers to take on an apprentice, there becomes a real danger that no sustainable and long-term employment is available for them once they complete their training — potentially leaving us with a cadre of young people without a job at the end of their apprenticeship.

How will these latest reforms affect the viability of courses within colleges?

If only half of students can progress, then surely the second year of a full-time study programme suddenly looks a lot less viable than before. What about the readiness of young people to progress?

We all know that not all 17-year-olds are the same. Some are more than ready to take on the challenge of work while others need more time learning the softer skills needed to be a great employee. What will the 20 vocational routes looks like? And where do ‘hybrid’ subjects like creative media sit?

If all this seems as though there are far more questions than answers, it’s because there are.

However, one thing is certain. The sector that emerges from the current reforms will be very different to the one we know. Will it be stronger? If the vision being set out is realised and we take the opportunities on offer, then yes — I believe it will be.