Boles ducks question over skills white paper delay

Skills Minister Nick Boles ducked a question about delays to the first skills white paper in more than 10 years — after Labour’s Gordon Marsden raised the issue in parliament.

The exchange, during House of Commons business, innovation and skills questions, came after FE Week exclusively revealed last week that the first skills white paper in more than 10 years has been delayed.Boles final session HLSMC

After quizzing Mr Boles (pictured right) yesterday about cuts to the adult skills budget, Shadow Skills Minister Mr Marsden (pictured above) asked: “Why is the government’s key white paper to address technical skills shortages being delayed?”

But Mr Boles’ response focused on government funding for FE and did not answer the question about the white paper directly.

He said: “We are increasing total funding available for further education by 40 per cent in cash terms during this parliament.

“He talks about last year because he doesn’t like this year, because this year tells a story of a government investing in skills for the future,” Mr Boles added.

This prompted Mr Marsden to table a parliamentary question about government plans for the skills white paper.

He asked the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills “when his Department plans to publish its skills white paper”.

The question, tabled on May 3, has yet to be answered.

As reported by FE Week, the Skills Funding Agency released a document in February called ‘The Legal Entitlements for 2016 to 2017’ which referenced an upcoming skills white paper that it said would be published in the spring.

But this reference to when it would be unveiled had been removed in version two of the document, updated in March.

The delay to the white paper may be because the independent panel on reforms to technical and professional education (TPE), set up by the government and led by Lord Sainsbury, has not yet reported its findings.

The panel, which was set up to help the government create “up to 20 specific new professional and technical routes, leading up to employment or degree-level”, was due to have completed by March.

But FE Week understands the panel will now not be reporting its findings until mid-to-late May.

A spokesperson for DfE said the report from the Lord Sainsbury review would be published in due course, but declined to comment on the planned briefing for awarding organisations.

Factors affecting choice of college aren’t set in stone

Holger Bollmann analyses the results of a recent survey of FE students and parents which looked at what factors affect college choice most.

What matters most when choosing a college?

This is a question for which an answer wasn’t readily available. So, we partnered with YouGov to find out, asking FE students and their parents what key factors influenced their choices.

Having conducted the survey both this year and last, what we discovered was a noticeable variation in the importance of factors over the course of the two years.

We discovered a noticeable variation in the importance of factors over the course of the two years

This is significant news for institutions looking to heighten their appeal to prospective students, as it suggests the importance of factors is liable to change year-on-year.

The two factors registering the largest increases in importance to students were employability and financial assistance.

In our 2015 survey, they received 21 per cent and 10 per cent of the vote respectively, with these figures rising to 26 per cent and 17 per cent in 2016.

With over a quarter of students now ranking employability as their most important factor, it is clear that colleges are expected to help improve their career prospects, particularly as the job market becomes more competitive.

Colleges should also be aware that financial support is quickly rising up the student agenda, most likely as a response to the changes made to the student finance system over the past year.

Course and institution reputation dropped the most in importance to students, falling from 37 per cent to 30 per cent and 29 per cent to 21 per cent respectively over the space of a year.

These changes suggest students are increasingly valuing ‘experience’ factors like careers and financial support over factors linked directly to the reputation of the institution and its courses.

Equivalent changes to parents’ attitudes were not forthcoming across the two surveys.

In both 2015 and 2016, parents selected course reputation, proximity to home, and institution reputation as their top three factors when assessing which college is most suitable for their child.

Survey respondents were also asked about expectations of and attitudes towards FE payments.

Most significantly, we noticed a decrease in the numbers of students and parents expecting colleges to take cash and cheques, and an increase in the desire to make all payments online.

In addition, 2016 marked the first time the majority of students (57 per cent) said they would prefer to make all fees and services payments by web or mobile apps.

This corresponds with increases in student usage of credit card payments (+8 per cent), mobile payments (+7 per cent) bank transfers (+5 per cent), and PayPal (+5 per cent).

When it comes to paying for catering fees or physical goods, more students are expecting to be able to pay using contactless (+13 per cent).

The results further indicate the importance of meeting student expectations of payments.

Over a quarter (29 per cent) of respondents said they would complain to their friends and families if they received an unsatisfactory of bad experience when making a payment to their college.

What’s more, over three quarters (76 per cent) said they would be less likely to recommend the college as a result.

This shows how easily a bad experience in one area of student life can turn alumni from potential promoters into detractors.

There are many factors that can influence a college’s ability to recruit students in the future – poor payment processes shouldn’t be one of them.

Proactive colleges will be aware the factors influencing students’ choice of institution aren’t set in stone, and should work consistently to improve in all areas to guarantee successful recruitment.

However, what is clear at present is that overarching factors such as college and course reputation aren’t guaranteed to have the heaviest influence on student choice.

Rather, factors associated more closely with student experience, such as employment and financial support services, are just as likely (if not more) to hold most sway.

*Based on the opinions of 424 FE students and 606 parents of FE students.

Getting personal

As an employer myself, it was a surprise to learn that Ofsted had decided not to take any action against one of its own employees for vehemently criticising Sir Michael Wilshaw.

But on reflection, Wilshaw’s outspoken criticism of the sector has created an unprecedented situation.

He brought Ofsted into disrepute as a witness to the education select committee, expressing personal views that did not reflect the position of the important organisation he leads.

Ofsted said in its statement, explaining why it had dropped the investigation against Mr Davis, that everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

I don’t think that can ever really apply though to the leader of the national inspectorate — who should always bear in mind the importance of maintaining its credibility with all of the education sectors.

It is little wonder then that inspectors who represent him on the front line feel let down, and Mr Davis was speaking up for them.

Mr Davis writes with a great deal of authority on page 14, and has shown a huge amount of guts by speaking out.

And given the special circumstances, Ofsted should also be congratulated for backing away from disciplining him.

Hull College votes to strike over pay and lesson observation

“Angry and demoralised” staff at Hull College have voted to go on strike in a row over pay, and a controversial new lesson observation system.

The University and College Union (UCU) said the college had offered staff a 0.7 per cent pay rise last September, and had also promised to make changes to unannounced lesson observations, which have been heavily criticised by teachers.

But the college went back on its promise to increase pay, while staff have complained that changes to the lesson observation system are leaving them more stressed and anxious than ever, the union has claimed.

John Giddins, UCU’s Yorkshire and Humberside regional branch development organiser, branded the situation as “appalling financial management”.

He told FE Week: “The staff have had no pay rise for the past couple of years while other colleges in the region have implemented pay deals to reward their staff. Hull College is unwilling to do that even though they were forecast to make £103,000 surplus.”

Mr Giddins said staff were “rightly anxious” that a “judgement based upon a snapshot”, such as the college’s observations process, could affect their career, type of pay, or even leave a “massive slur on people’s professionalism, which demonstrates a lack of trust in their staff”.

He added: “Part of the issue is that observations are flawed in essence. A whole raft of academic evidence shows that big decisions should not be predicated on the results of classroom observations because of the lack of reliability and validity.”

Hull College currently uses lesson observations to make a variety of decisions on staff, including peer progression, selection for redundancy criteria, and capabilities.

Mr Giddins said: “The consequences of these unannounced observations is that people could be waiting all year for them, and instead of focusing on teaching and learning, they are actually wondering when someone is going to walk in with a clipboard and use quite a restrictive notion of what is good teaching practice to measure them by.

“Staff really want to play a part in owning an observation teaching and learning policy rather than having it done to them.”

Julie Kelley, one of UCU’s regional officials, said strike action was always a “last resort” but staff at Hull College felt they had no choice.

Mr Giddins added that the way Hull College had conducted its industrial relations was “appalling and threatening”.

He said: “They have issued a statement on their staff portal that is unequivocal in that any action short of a strike would be deducted at full pay, and the language that they use is appalling.”

A spokesperson for Hull College said that less than 12 per cent of the college’s overall workforce voted for the strikes.

The spokesperson said: “The management team and UCU are continuing to meet to resolve the issues which ensure the group’s overall financial position is protected in a challenging funding climate for the FE sector, as well as ensuring the high quality of our teaching and learning is maintained, as highlighted by Ofsted in our most recent inspection.”

The college was rated as good by Ofsted in its latest inspection which took place in November 2015.

Picture caption:
Hull College staff during strike action, in February, over the Association of Colleges’ recommendation for a zero per cent pay rise in 2015/16

First skills white paper in 10 years faces delays

The government has delayed publication of a new skills white paper that is supposed to spell out its technical and professional education (TPE) reform plans, FE Week has discovered.

The last 14-19 education and skills white paper to be released by the government came out over 10 years ago, in 2005.

However, in February the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) released a document labelled ‘The Legal Entitlements for 2016 to 2017’, which referenced an upcoming skills white paper for this year.

The document said: “The 2016 to 2017 funding year is part of a transitional period as we move towards full skills devolution and the implementation of Technical and Professional Education (TPE) reforms.

“This transition gives time to move to new entitlement qualifications as well as make any changes to curriculum that come out of the reform of TPE. More information will be available when a skills white paper is published in the spring.”

But the release of the paper appears to have been delayed, as an updated version of the same document appears to have removed the reference to when it would be unveiled.

The link to the first version of the document has also been altered to redirect straight to the new updated copy.

It highlights the recent TPE reform work of an independent panel, led by Lord Sainsbury (pictured) and set up to help the government create “up to 20 specific new professional and technical routes, leading up to employment or degree-level”.

Other contributors on the panel included Professor Alison Wolf (pictured), whose landmark 2011 Review of Vocational Education sparked the introduction of the study programmes; Simon Blagdon, non-executive chairman of Fujitsu UK; and Bev Robinson, principal of Blackpool and the Fylde College.

FE Week understands the panel will not now be reporting its findings until mid-to-late May — even though this was supposed to have been completed last month — which may be delaying the release of the white paper.

The ‘Legal Entitlements for 2016 to 2017′ documents also highlight a hold-up in agreeing “the process for adding new qualifications”.

The first version promised that by March a “final list of qualifications that can be delivered as part of the entitlements” and that a “process for adding new qualifications to the entitlement” would be agreed with the Department for Education.

This, it said, would follow a “consultation with colleges, other training organisations and awarding organisations”.

However, the March version indicated this had still not been carried out.

Alison-Wolf-QT
Professor Alison Wolf

It said: “We will agree the process for adding new qualifications to the entitlement with the DfE. We will confirm this following the publication of the skills white paper.”

The DfE and SFA declined to comment on the delay, or when the skills white paper would be released, or whether further information about reforms to technical and professional education would be provided.

Featured: Marathon effort for caped crusaders

A North Shropshire College (NSC) lecturer proved he was a superhero by raising thousands of pounds for children who suffer from cancer by completing the London Marathon last Sunday, writes Billy Camden.

North Shropshire College sport lecturer Paul Clark has completed the mammoth 26.2 mile London marathon and helped raise nearly £4,000 for a cause close to his heart.

He was part of a sea of nearly 40,000 people who took part in the race on April 24.

Feature-inset

Mr Clark ran with his brother Mike, who works in a children’s cancer unit in Liverpool, with both wearing superhero-style capes.

They raised almost £4,000 together for Children with Cancer.

“My brother has been witness to the pain and suffering children and families have gone through,” said Paul.

“No parent should ever have to lose a child, especially to cancer, and that inspired us throughout the run.”

This was the second marathon the brothers had completed together, “so we knew what we was letting ourselves in for”, said Paul.

The pair started side-by-side at Greenwich Park and kept together for the first third of race, high-fiving spectators and “getting the crowd going” in their costumes, which they wore to symbolise their status as “superheroes” in the eyes of the children and families they raised money for.

But the pair, who wanted to cross the finish line arm-in-arm, were eventually split up when variables including restroom breaks and the sheer amount of runners separated them.

Paul explains: “You go through a number of different stages throughout the run.

“The first six miles is joy and excitement and elation and you’re just involved with the crowd. After that you start paying more attention to your body as your legs start to ache.

“You notice little hotspots appearing, you ache, your breathing starts playing up and you get hot so you have to consider what to take on board to get through it.

“I wanted to stop around mile 18 because of the pain but you just have to keep going.”

But he said the physical pain was all worth the emotional reward when he reached the famous finish line at the Mall.

“Your determination and effort is rewarded straight away because you touch the clock as you go through and you know you have been part of something ridiculously special.

“All the pain for about three seconds disappears and you’ve got loads of adrenaline and you’re buzzing.”

Mike finished 10 minutes ahead at a time of 3hrs 50mins, while Paul completed it dead on 4hrs.

This year was a special occasion for the London marathon as one lucky runner would have become the millionth finisher in the history of the race, which was first held in 1981.

Their identity will be revealed in May, and they will also enter the record books.

Whether he was the actual millionth runner or not, Paul said it was a “great achievement” to be classed as “one in a million”.

He returned to college on the Monday just a day after the gruelling race and said the feeling was like “waking up still drunk”.

NSC’s principal, Jackie Doodson, said: “The college is really proud of Paul. It is a brilliant charity he’s supporting and it is fantastic he finished dead on four hours. Well done Paul.”

You can still donate to Paul and Mike’s marathon effort by visiting: http://goo.gl/3TfHA9

Main pic: Superheroes Paul Clark (Left) and his brother Mike raise their fingers to show they are one in a million at the London marathon

Warnings over finances for three colleges and council’s adult education provision

Three more colleges have had concerns raised over their finances, alongside Wakefield council’s adult education provision, according to the latest reports from the FE Commissioner.

The reports for Telford College of Arts and Technology (TCAT), Richmond upon Thames College (RUTC), Warrington Collegiate, and Wakefield District Council were published on April 21, following visits by the Commissioner, Dr David Collins’ (pictured), team to each of them between December and February.

His report into TCAT recommended placing the college in administered status.

Dr Collins’ advisers visited the college from December 7 to 11 after it was issued with a financial notice of concern by the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) in November.

He said in his report that “the college has experienced a rapid decline in its financial health in recent years”.

In his letter to TCAT chair Rick Tyrer, dated January 27, Skills Minister Nick Boles said: “The financial recovery plan is incomplete and there are still serious concerns over financial planning and forecasting.”

Jo Lomax, TCAT’s interim principal, whose appointment was one of a number “significant changes” to its senior management following Dr Collins’ visit, said the college had been “disproportionately affected” by funding cuts to adult education provision.

“We welcome the support from the FE Commissioner in helping us to overcome difficulties,” she added.Letter

The FE Commissioner’s intervention at RUTC came after the college was assessed as inadequate for financial health for 2015/16 by the SFA.

In his report, dated January 2016 and based on a visit by his team from December 7 to 11, Dr Collins said the college’s staff-costs-to-income ratio was too high, and reducing it could save the college £1m.

As a result, he recommended that “the college should revisit its decision not to take forward further staff restructuring during 2015/16”.

An RUTC spokesperson said the college acknowledged the findings of Dr Collins’ report.

The college’s strategy “is supported by a robust financial plan which will deliver outstanding financial health through continual review of revenue opportunities and management of costs,” she added.

Dr Collins’ involvement at Warrington Collegiate was also prompted by a judgement of inadequate financial health by the SFA in November.

In his report, based on a visit by his team from December 15 to 17, the FE Commissioner praised the “prompt action” taken by new principal Nichola Newton.

But he added: “The college faces a difficult financial situation, and needs to strengthen its recovery plan.”FE comm table

Ms Newton said the report was “not reflective of the college’s current position” and that feedback they had received from his team, who revisited the college on April 26 and 27, “indicates good progress against all the recommendations”.

The Commissioner’s report on Wakefield District Council’s Adult and Community Education Service (ACES), based on a visit by his team from February 23 to 25, said that subsequent action taken by the council after the service had been branded inadequate by Ofsted in November was “very positive”.

But he said “there is no proof so far these changes have benefited learners”.

John Wilson, the council’s corporate director for children and young people, said a governing improvement board established “to focus on increasing the speed of improvement in the quality of teaching and performance of learners” was bearing fruit.

 

 

Main pic: David Collins

College and council responses in full:

Telford College of Arts and Technology (TCAT)
TCAT said it had already made significant changes to its senior management team since the Minister of State’s letter, including the departure of principal Chris Scott.
Interim principal Jo Lomax said: “These are challenging times in the Further Education sector, particularly for colleges with a large adult education provision, where funding has fallen significantly.

“Here at TCAT, we have one of the largest adult education provisions in the region, so we have been disproportionately affected. So we welcome the support from the Further Education Commissioner, in helping us to overcome difficulties that we are facing.

“It can only assist us in our quest to ensure that we continue to be a vibrant college playing a positive role in helping great futures to begin for our learners.”

The college has this month begun talks with its near neighbour, New College Telford, with a view to a possible merger – in line with recommendations from an area review of further education provision.

Richmond upon Thames College
The college acknowledges the findings of the FE Commissioner endorsing a college led recovery process which started with the arrival of a new leadership team in 2014/15.

We continue to deliver improvements in our financial position reflected in the improved outturn for 2014/15 and are committed to delivery of our strategic plan Richmond 2020. The strategy is supported by a robust financial plan which will deliver outstanding financial health through continual review of revenue opportunities and management of costs. The FE Commissioner’s report fully recognises the significant upside of the college redevelopment which in turn has the full backing from the Greater London Authority.

The college welcomes the area review process and the estate redevelopment not only provides for specialist facilities and resources but also demonstrably delivers a significant return to the public purse through estate rationalisation, creation of new schools and housing. The corporation board is regularly refreshed and continues to appoint members with considerable industrial and financial expertise, notwithstanding the reports acknowledgement that the chair has considerable capital and estate management expertise.

Warrington Collegiate
Nichola Newton, Principal and CEO of Warrington Collegiate, said: “The FE Commissioner’s report published only recently was the outcome of a visit from the FE Commissioner’s team in December 2015 and, having made good progress against the recommendations contained within it, is not reflective of the college’s current position.

“The FE Commissioner’s team has just completed a follow up visit (26th and 27th April) and, whilst we await the final report, we are very pleased with the positive verbal feedback we have received which indicates good progress against all the recommendations in the original report. We expect to receive the FE Commissioner’s report formally outlining the findings from the follow up visit in the next few weeks.”

Wakefield District Council
John Wilson, corporate director children and young people at Wakefield Council said: “The report confirmed the areas of concern which we had already identified and were already seeking to improve.

“Further to the Ofsted report we have established a Governing Improvement Board, with an independent chair to focus on increasing the speed of improvement in the quality of teaching and performance of learners. The board meets fortnightly and we are already seeing improvements in both these areas.”

Another brick in the wall

A former Walsall College construction student has proven her quality after claiming the rising star honour at this year’s Women in Construction Awards.

Claire Brittain (right) being presented with her rising star award by Sue Pollard, principal geotechnical engineer at Atkins Construction
Claire Brittain (right) being presented with her rising star award by Sue Pollard, principal geotechnical engineer at Atkins Construction

Claire Brittain, assistant site manager at BAM Construction, was presented with her award at a glittering awards ceremony at the Palace Hotel in Manchester.

In between having her two children, Claire decided to build on her skills and enrolled onto a level three BTec in construction and the built environment course at Walsall College.

She then landed her dream job with BAM, who sponsored her to complete her level four higher national certificate, which she completed in 2014.

After receiving her award, 27-year-old Claire said: “It shows that you can be a woman, have children, and have a career in construction. It’s important that if women want to get into the construction industry, they follow their dream and let nothing stand in their way.”

Claire has now continued onto the BSc Honours in Construction Management qualification to achieve her full degree, which she is due to complete in 2017.

Balls bounce for Buckingham

An inaugural cup competition between Bridgwater College and Richard Huish College, set up in memory of a staff member who died last year, has raised nearly £500 for Bloodwise UK.

The Luke Buckingham Varsity Cup between the two colleges in Taunton was contested over the best of three sporting fixtures in netball, basketball and football.

The tournament was established in remembrance of Luke Buckingham, creator of Team BC Sport at Bridgwater College who died in October 2015.

Huish took the netball crown, beating Bridgwater 26-44, followed by an “epic” game of basketball where Team BC won 71-67 leaving the Varsity Cup all-square at 1-1.

The final fixture, football, went down to a winner-takes-all game under the floodlights at Bridgwater Town FC.

And it was Huish who sealed victory with a 3-1 win on the night to claim the Varsity Cup.

Sam Reilly, head of sports, outdoor education and public services at Bridgwater College said: “The standard of sports and the excitement of the day was outstanding and made a fitting spectacle for the Luke Buckingham Varsity Cup.”

 

Main pic: The netball teams from Bridgwater College (blue kit) and Richard Huish College after their match in the Luke Buckingham Varsity Cup