Large drop in number of standards lacking end-point assessors

The proportion of learners on apprenticeship standards without an approved assessment organisation is dropping rapidly, according to new figures.

Statistics published in October showed 42 per cent of all starts (1,790 out of 4,240) until July had no assessment organisation to choose from – a situation that former top skills civil servant Dr Sue Pember described as “diabolical” (pictured).

However, FE Week has crunched the numbers in the latest government data, released on Thursday (January 26), and found that the proportion of courses without assessors had fallen by more than half to 18 per cent in October.

In all, 82 per cent of apprentices were on standards with at least one approved assessment organisation at the end of October 2016.

There were 9,550 overall starts on the new standards by the end of that month, which meant that 1,680 apprentices were still forced to start on programmes that didn’t have any end-point assessment organisations in place.

And 950 of these without an end-point assessor – representing 10 per cent of all starts – were on standards that had their first start back in 2014/15.

The lack of assessors is significant because all apprentices on the new standards, which are gradually replacing frameworks, are required to pass an end-point assessment to complete their apprenticeship.

These must be carried out by AOs that have been cleared for the task by the government, on the Skills Funding Agency’s register of apprentice assessment organisations.

Dr Pember told FE Week in October that it was “diabolical” to allow an apprentice “to start a programme without explaining not only what the end test will contain, but where it will be, what shape it will take and who will be the organisation to oversee and manage the process”.

There are currently 159 standards approved for delivery, of which 81 have at least one assessment organisation in place, while 78 are without.

So while the number of standards with an assessment organisation in place is rising, the proportion without is still hovering around the 50 per cent mark.

The latest statistical release included provisional data on apprenticeship starts between August and October 2016, as well as final data on starts from previous years.

It showed that the number of standards to have attracted at least one start has increased to 90 – up from the 56 in October’s SFR.

And while 35 of these standards have not yet secured an assessment organisation, compared with 33 in October, this represents a significantly smaller proportion than before – 39 per cent compared with 59 per cent.

Six of these standards had their first starts in 2014/15, meaning that some apprentices have been studying for more than two years without knowing how they will be assessed at the end of their apprenticeship.

Five of these standards – electrical/ electronic technical support engineer, manufacturing engineer, mechatronics maintenance technician, product design and development engineer, and product design and development technician – were developed by the automotive Trailblazer group led by Jaguar Land Rover.

A spokesperson for Jaguar Land Rover told FE Week: “Although EPA is outstanding, we are still very confident that the solution will be in place when it is required.”

The sixth standard, relationship manager (banking), was developed by the financial services Trailblazer group led by Barclays.

A spokesperson for the bank told FE Week that it had no concerns about the lack of an end-point assessment organisation for the standard.

The Department for Education said in October that it was working with the Skills Funding Agency to encourage more assessment organisations to apply to the register.

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. Mark Andrews

    It is good news that new EPA organisations are coming on line and being approved. I have to wonder how many of them are ready and have the capability to deliver however. If the volume of calls to my college from AO’s who want us to do the actual work is representative, I would say that a good proportion of the accredited EPA organisations don’t even plan to deliver, but intend to take a brokerage/management fee for developing the assessments, referring learners, and overseeing the quality of assessment done by a network of training providers. I wonder how many will fail to secure agreements which will offer sufficient capacity, availability and geographical coverage.

  2. N Smalley

    Reffering back to Dr Pember comments of not explaining what the EPA contains. It clear states in the EPA assessment plan what is involved and who will oversee this part. The emphasis is on the employer. The whole point of the apprenticeship reform was to bring more involvement from employers. Having been planning the delivery of our apprenticeship programme im finding employers are lacking the knowledge of what is suppose to happen from start to finish.