Labour’s levy plan would limit apprenticeships to 140,000 a year, government claims

Proposal would cost an additional £1.5bn, new estimations suggest

Proposal would cost an additional £1.5bn, new estimations suggest

Expanding the apprenticeship levy so that half of funding can be spent on other forms of training would limit the country to 140,000 apprenticeship starts per year, the government has claimed.

New Department for Education estimations for the plan, which has been proposed by the Labour Party in the buildup to the general election, state that doing so would cost an additional £1.5 billion.

Skills minister Robert Halfon revealed the forecast in an answer to a parliamentary question, tabled by Conservative MP Simon Jupp. He said it is “important that the apprenticeships budget remains ring-fenced for apprenticeships to ensure continued affordability of the programme”.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer last year announced his intention to reform the apprenticeship levy so that it can be spent on other types of training if the party comes into power.

It would be called the “growth and skills levy” and allow businesses to use 50 per cent of their funds to fund non-apprenticeship training. But experts have warned this would swallow up funding for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) which are funded by the levy as well as large firms.

In June, then shadow skills minister Toby Perkins committed to additional spending for a ringfenced budget for apprenticeships in SMEs.

Halfon reiterated that in the last two financial years, an average 98 per cent of the Department for Education’s apprenticeships budget was spent.

He said: “If employers were able to use 25 per cent of their levy funds for non-apprenticeships training, the department estimates that this would create an additional cost of up to approximately £700 million per annum.

“Allowing employers to use up to 50 per cent of their funds for non-apprenticeship training would increase this cost to up to £1.5 billion per annum.

“Without making additional funding available to support this flexible use of levy funds, the department estimates that this would require a significant reduction in new apprenticeship starts to approximately 140,000 per annum.”

This is around a 60 per cent decrease on the 336,000 apprenticeship starts reported for the 2022/23 academic year.

The DfE told FE Week it calculated the estimations on the basis that around £3 billion enters levy payers’ apprenticeship service accounts each year, so “assuming the 50 per cent flexibility is fully utilised by employers (i.e £1.5 billion), and that the apprenticeships budget remains around £2.5 billion a year, that would leave around £1 billion annually to support apprenticeships”.

Education secretary Gillian Keegan said today she was “shocked at Labour’s plan to halve the number of apprentices. It’s an attack on working people”.

Data expert and chief executive of the Learning and Work Institute Stephen Evans said the DfE’s estimates are based on “quite simplistic analysis”.

He told FE Week: “The analysis involves dividing the apprenticeships budget by two and four.

“It just says if all large employers use all of their levy and use up the 50 per cent they might be allowed for non-apprenticeship training then this is the gap that there would be.

“Non-apprenticeship qualifications can also be a good thing and it depends what incentives you set up in the system as well – so what rules do you place around what employers can and cannot do, what rules do you place around SMEs.

“It is pretty simplistic and we need a bit more of a nuanced analysis.”

Labour did not respond to requests for comment.

Latest education roles from

Main Grade Lecturer – Business and Travel (0.8FTE)

Main Grade Lecturer – Business and Travel (0.8FTE)

Barnet and Southgate College

GCSE Maths Teacher (Mat cover)

GCSE Maths Teacher (Mat cover)

Barnsley College

Trainer Assessor – Countryside & Water Environment (Central/Midlands)

Trainer Assessor – Countryside & Water Environment (Central/Midlands)

Bridgwater & Taunton College

Trainer Assessor – Countryside & Water Environment

Trainer Assessor – Countryside & Water Environment

Bridgwater & Taunton College

Quality Reviewer

Quality Reviewer

Gateshead College

Head of Langdon College (London)

Head of Langdon College (London)

Kisharon Langdon

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

#GE2024: Listen now as Let’s Go Further outlines the FE and skills priorities facing our new government

The Skills and Education Group podcast, Let’s Go Further, aims to challenge the way we all think about skills...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

How can we prepare learners for their future in an ever-changing world?

By focusing their curriculums on transferable skills, digital skills, and sustainability, colleges and schools can be confident that learners...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Why we’re backing our UK skills ‘Olympians’ (and why you should too)

This August, teams from over 200 nations will gather to compete in the sticky heat of the Paris summer...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Is your organisation prepared for a major incident?

We live in an unpredictable world where an unforeseen incident or environmental event could disrupt a Further Education (FE)...

Advertorial

More from this theme

Politics

Jacqui Smith: 10 facts about the new skills, FE and HE minister

Roles have not been officially announced, but Smith confirmed her brief in a recent podcast ahead of a college...

Josh Mellor
Election 2024, Politics

No ‘quick and easy solutions’ to ‘major’ challenges, Phillipson warns education sector

Labour's 6,500 new teachers pledge will apply to colleges, according to a letter from the new education secretary

Freddie Whittaker
Election 2024, Politics

Former home sec Jacqui Smith expected to become skills and FE minister

Former Labour home secretary Jacqui Smith will return to government

FE Week Reporter
Election 2024, Politics

Who is Bridget Phillipson? 8 facts about the new education secretary

What we know about the minister handed the keys to the Department for Education

Freddie Whittaker

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments

  1. JustSaying

    A 60% reduction in starts is a similar value to the number of Apprenticeship currently undertaken by employed adults already in the job role they are receiving this training to undertake. Engagement in this training is not done because it is an apprenticeship. It is done because apprenticeship funding is the only option available to fund the type of qualification based skills training they want! Whilst some apprenticeship provision may be good it doesn’t deflect from this point!
    Allowing 50% of the levy to tackle the provision of skills training with qualifications to existing employees is a good thing that should be welcomed by all employers and employees. In addition, if the levy funding mechanisms are also used to disperse this to the approved training organisations, then the disastrous funding mechanisms currently used in relation to AEB/ Level 3 Entitlement can also be removed.

  2. A couple of things to add to the comment above.

    The parliamentary question was flawed; “important that the apprenticeships budget remains ring-fenced for apprenticeships to ensure continued affordability of the programme”. The words ‘remains’ and ‘ring-fenced’ are out of place given that we know a huge amount of levy funds didn’t make it as far as the budget. How many billions was that again?

    Secondly, remember the recent ‘I don’t understand why achievement rates aren’t 99%’. If achievement rates were 99%, on current volumes that would cost an additional c£800m in on-programme and achievement payments.

    I feel sorry for the civil servants forced to provide figures for such unbalanced narratives. It can’t be healthy.