GCSEs vs functional skills: which English and maths resits should your students take?

When only one per cent of E-grade students pass their maths GCSE on resit, why are they not sitting functional skills instead? Bill Watkin describes an alternative, win-win scenario.

Every 16-year-old who has not achieved a C-grade or higher in their GCSE maths or English by the end of Year 11 must now continue in Year 12 to work towards passing a level two qualification (GCSE or equivalent), if they are to meet the DfE’s condition for funding.

Those who achieved a D-grade at 16 have no choice: it is the GCSE that they must resit. But those who achieved anything between E and U can either resit the GCSE, or study an alternative: the functional skills courses. So there appears to be a perverse incentive at play: is it better to get an E than a D at GCSE?

In the GCSE resits, most students, having failed to achieve a C after five years in school, were, perhaps unsurprisingly, still unable to make the grade after just over two terms of post-16 study. Only 18 per cent of those with a D in maths in 2014 went on to pass their resit in 2015; only one per cent of those with an E managed to do the same.

READ MORE: What is Core Maths and why is funding it so important?

But E-grade students can take the alternative functional skills, so why do some colleges still enter them for the GCSE? Why would an E-grade student, with just a one per cent chance of passing, resit the GCSE rather than the alternative?

Dr Becky Allen at Datalab suggests that functional skills might not be on offer, or that the GCSE might be perceived by teachers or students as a better route to eventual success.

So which are the right English and maths resits for students with an E or lower in their GCSE?

Too often, students are asked to resit the GCSE even though it is not necessarily best suited to their aptitudes, interests, other studies and workplace aspirations.

An applicant who has functional skills will be in a better place than one who has neither functional skills nor GCSE

Some argue that the GCSE qualification is more rigorous, more demanding and therefore more valuable and respected by employers; to enter students into a supposedly lesser alternative would be to do them a disservice because their future prospects will be less bright if they do not have a GCSE.

Others say that functional skills courses, following recent reforms, are now more difficult than they used to be, less accessible to lower-ability learners, more academic in nature and perhaps less of a viable alternative. And then there are those in the other camp, who point out that functional skills are more relevant in the context of preparing for technical and trade-related destinations and give students a better chance of reaching the required standard.

And what of employers? How do employers view a functional skills qualification compared with a GCSE? Well, inevitably, a GCSE will give a job applicant an edge. On the other hand – and this may be the crucial point here – an applicant who has functional skills will be in a better place than one who has neither functional skills nor GCSE.

And if the reformed, more difficult 2017 GCSEs are to be increasingly out of reach, and if the GCSE course-content is less relevant to the job than the applied literacy and numeracy that some employers will require for parts of their workforce, maybe this could lead to a win-win situation, where employers recognise the value of functional skills and applicants are better equipped.

Functional skills might be more suited to some students’ aptitudes; they also count towards the new level two English and maths measure in post-16 performance tables. To top it off, they offer a better route to a pass for E-U students. But in some colleges, GCSE is still the currency of choice.

Despite all this, it is reassuring to know that the government’s analysis of 2014/15 shadow measures shows that sixth form colleges get better results, notably than schools and academies, in English and maths resits. Early data returns this summer appear to bear this out, which is certainly something to celebrate.

Bill Watkin is Chief Executive of the Sixth Form Colleges Association

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. I agree that Functional Skills is for many a better option, however as a retired Full Time Functional Skills lecturer but experience suggest that only a very few students who achieved an E at GCSE would be capable of completing level 2 Functional Skills without doing level 1 first. Therefore this needs to be regarded as at least a 2 year journey.

  2. We have found that too many learners are now failing the functional mathematics and English qualifications at level 1 and 2 since the recent Ofqual reforms. We have discussed with colleagues in other colleges – many of whom were very successfully using functional skills qualifications with learners last year, they are also seeing the same decimation of results at level 1 and level 2.
    As a college, we have moved wholesale to GCSEs – except for a very small number who are working towards entry level functional skills. I am also concerned that the iGCSE will no longer be available for English after this year. The absence of pre 19th Century text makes it much more meaningful and accessible for young people who have failed to achieve a C grade in English after full compulsory teaching in this subject over many years. This morning, I spoke to many of our English GCSE resit learners, after their exam, who say the paper is much better than the GCSE paper they failed last summer in school. I have seen bright and articulate young people today who feel more confident in themselves after a good experience in the English iGCSE exam today.

    • Gurinder Singh

      I got a U in Maths and a 3 in English i’m resitting them for the 3rd time now very frustrated as you can imagine and i am looking for some tips.