The Education and Training Foundation (ETF) has launched a new professional membership body for FE practitioners.

The creation of the Society for Education and Training (Set) follows the demise of the Institute for Learning (IfL), which transferred its legacy and assets to the ETF in November after running into financial difficulties.

Set’s £63 annual membership offer will include direct and indirect access to development opportunities and face-to-face and online communities that share best practice and support with research, an ETF spokesperson said.

Tim-Weiss-cutout

She added refreshed membership levels and enhancements to Qualified Teacher Learning and Skills (QTLS) status would also be available — with a plan to push the number of QTLS status lecturers above 20k in the next three years.

Further benefits are expected to be announced in the coming months, although membership will not be compulsory.

Tim Weiss (pictured), ETF director for strategy, quality and research said: “We want the society to bring members clear added value to their practice, so that being a member speaks for itself in terms of a commitment to professionalism, to ongoing development, and to the sector.”

The responsibility for QTLS was transferred to the ETF when the IfL closed, with members automatically joining the ETF’s Professional Membership Service.

David Russell (pictured below, left), ETF chief exective, said it had been “consulting over the past six months to inform the vision and strategy for the new professional membership service.”

russell web 2And while Set is currently supported and hosted by the ETF, its aim is to be self-sustainable and for membership subscriptions to fully fund the provision of member benefits in the medium to long term.

However, it has already faced criticism over its £63 membership fee — the same as the IfL’s at the time of its transfer to ETF.

Freelance interim FE manager Jayne Stigger (pictured below) said: “For the majority of poorly paid staff in FE the fee probably is too much. And compared to the amount of CPD available free and online, I don’t yet see the value of spending £63 a-year to join an organisation that appears to be moving us back in time rather than supporting the new initiatives that have sprung up during the wilderness years.”Jayne_Stigger

She added: “My status within my field of expertise is my track record, my employment record, the impact I have had on the colleges I have worked for and the staff and learners I have been responsible for — not how many times I have sat through a prescribed series of CPD activities.”

An ETF spokesperson said: “We recognise that affordability is important and will be offering the payment option of monthly direct debits to allow members to spread the cost.”

FE Week understands the Set chair, chief executive and board members, as well as members of the practitioner advisory group, are expected to be appointed in time for full operation by the autumn.

Latest education roles from

Assessor in Education and Early Years

Assessor in Education and Early Years

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Business Development Support Officer

Business Development Support Officer

Bradford College

Catering Assistant – Maternity Cover

Catering Assistant – Maternity Cover

Heart of Yorkshire Education Group

Progress and Retention Officer (Part Time 0.4 FTE)

Progress and Retention Officer (Part Time 0.4 FTE)

Bradford College

Invigilator

Invigilator

Halesowen College

Curriculum Manager – Multi-Skills

Curriculum Manager – Multi-Skills

South Thames College

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. FE Lecturer

    Jayne Stigger is absolutely correct and I am sure that most lecturers feel exactly the same about this. We need less bureaucracy and we could do without highly paid ‘experts’ specifying how many hours of CPD we need to do and checking we have done it.
    If FE colleges are to survive they need to avoid this nonsense about CPD hours and let us get on with the job. Invariably when you put in a request to do a course the answer coming back is the college can’t afford it – they just send the chosen few on courses that cost money.