Key sector figures have urged the government to continue with its apprenticeship reforms following Thursday’s Brexit vote – and warned of the consequences if it doesn’t.
The vote by the British public to leave the European Union came after a speech by skills minister Nick Boles on June 13 raised concerns that such a verdict could kill off the apprenticeship levy.
It has already led to the resignation of prime minister David Cameron, on Friday, and a mass exodus from Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s shadow cabinet on Sunday.
Mark Dawe, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, was among those who argued it was now more important than ever to press ahead with its apprenticeship plans.
He said: “If anything, the referendum result means that a skilled British workforce will be needed more than ever, so the target of three million apprenticeship starts by 2020 takes on a new significance.”
Mr Dawe also stressed the need for “clarity” from the government on its levy plans.
He said: “I can understand they’ll pause for a moment and think, but if we don’t know what’s going to happen it’s going to by default not happen in April.”
Chris Jeffery, non-executive director for independent training provider Skills Group, reiterated Mr Dawe’s call for clarity.
While she said it could be a “long time before you see the impact” of the referendum vote, she warned that “any delay regarding the detail is only going to frustrate providers even more and employers as well”.
Their views were echoed by Professor Alison Wolf, who made the case for an employer levy to fund apprenticeship training in a report published days before the government first unveiled the charge last July.
She told FE Week that “skills policy has become more important than ever” in the light of the referendum result.
She said: “One argument for the apprenticeship levy was that firms had cut back their training expenditures over the years, in part because they found it cheaper and easier to use skilled migrant/immigrant labour.”
Professor Wolf said that if the UK decided to opt out of the free movement of labour within Europe “the need to increase our skilled, level three apprenticeship numbers will be more pressing than ever”.
But Gordon Marsden, shadow skills minister, warned that if companies’ “collaboration and cooperation with European companies in building things and winning contracts was being diminished, then obviously either their ability to or their need to recruit more highly skilled apprenticeships could become quite volatile.”
Martin Doel, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, pressed the government to “make it clear as soon as possible how it will continue to fund education and training for the good of everyone.”
And Shakira Martin, National Union of Students vice president for FE, cautioned that if the levy were scrapped “we’re going to see the aspirations of so many young people wanting to get into training and work squashed”.
She urged: “The government should be assuring young people that they have a future in the UK’s skilled workforce, not removing our future chances.”
But Nadhim Zahawi, the prime minister’s apprenticeship adviser, said the “apprenticeship levy and the enhancement of our nation’s skills is a central government policy, and this will continue to be the case.”
Others have raised concerns over the impact of the Brexit vote on the ESF cash the UK receives from the EU for skills training.
Sue Pember, director of policy and external relationships at HOLEX, urged the government to “stabilise their policy” around ESF-funded activities.
She said: “These funds have provided vital support for our adult education students and they will need to be replaced.”
A spokesperson for the University and Colleges Union (UCU) said that colleges received “significant funding” from the ESF, and called on the government to “act quickly to quell uncertainty and set out its plans for sustainable further education funding now and in the future”.
Janet Clark, education policy adviser at the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said that it would be against any post-16 funding cuts but added that “future funding will depend on what happens to the economy”.
Brett vox pops from the AELP Conference.
Your thoughts