Opinion

Establishing a guild for the FE sector

Agreeing to chair a group setting up yet another representative body for FE is probably a career-limiting move unless there is a very good reason for another one. So I am pleased to say I think there is indeed a great need for a new body to take a leadership role in FE and I am excited by the unique opportunity we have to enhance the status and reputation of the sector.

The challenge we face in FE is huge because the world is changing rapidly around us and we need to serve young people and adults who are grappling with changes in society, work and technology which can sometimes seem bewildering.

We need to develop the sector to be fleet of foot, to keep up with changes in work, to use technology to deliver learning which equips people with the skills they will need to keep learning and be resilient to the changes around them.

The best in the sector do this day in day out, so we know that FE can do it, but we need stronger leadership and focus from employers, practitioners and their representative bodies to set standards which everyone aspires to.

The new guild provides us with the chance for the sector to come together just as the government and its agencies have retreated.

It also represents a moment of truth for the FE sector.

Can the sector take responsibility, collectively for its own future when part of its very strength is the diversity of organisations and learners in it?

I believe the diversity of learning, learners and organisations in FE should be celebrated as a key strength and that a new guild can play a leadership role across it.

A clear focus on delivering and supporting great learning to all adults across their lives will bind and unite the diverse voices, interests and organisations.

What we need is for employers and practitioners and the organisations which represent them to come together to make this work on behalf of the adults and young people who are served by the sector.

I am certain we can develop a new organisation which advances professionalism, improves leadership and governance and helps to deliver even better learning opportunities across England.

It will be this clarity of purpose which we will use to bring people together and keep us all focussed.

I believe the diversity of learning, learners and organisations in FE should be celebrated”

I was invited to chair the steering group, I believe, for two reasons. Firstly, because of the unique place and purpose of National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE) in advocating more, different and better learning for all adults.

This means we are not representing any particular interest group, other than learners.

Secondly, I hope that I have a reputation for getting things done and there is a lot of work to be done in order to build consensus about the purpose, role, structure and governance of the FE Guild and I hope to be one of the people driving that forward over the coming months.

We are planning now for an intense period of engagement with employers and practitioners and representative bodies to debate and discuss what the FE Guild should focus on, how it should be set-up and what the governance arrangements will look like.

That debate and discussion needs to be thorough and professional and I would urge everyone with any interest in FE to get involved.

We cannot afford for people with positive ideas and contributions not to come forward in the new year to enter the debate. Part of my role as chair of the steering group is to support an inclusive process in which all views are heard.

Our aim is to have the guild up-and-running in mid-2013, starting to develop its role and its activities and having an impact in the next academic year.

In order to achieve that we will work hard, consult properly, listen well and be decisive because all of us came into FE to support and deliver great learning and the guild can take a critical leadership role in achieving that.

David Hughes, NIACE chief executive and chair of the FE Guild steering group

More Reviews

Devolution is not incompatible with learner demand – but it is a barrier

Mark Dawe channels Bon Jovi to make the case for putting learners in charge of how further education is...

JL Dutaut

What Labour and LibDems can learn from Singapore’s SkillsFuture Credit scheme

Singapore’s example shows individual learner accounts can work and don’t need to wait for central government to be tried...

JL Dutaut

Gateway is a ‘no man’s land’ that leaves apprentices vulnerable

Caught between completion and assessment, too many apprentices are left to an inadequate support system

JL Dutaut

You’re never too young (or too old) for honest self-appraisal

Learners must understand their strengths and weaknesses to find fulfilling avenues for their talents - and so do we

JL Dutaut

8 reasons we shouldn’t use the term ‘provider’ – and what we could say instead

The term ‘provider’ is problematic and we need a new and better one to replace it in our lexicon...

JL Dutaut

How colleges can foster safe engagement with the Israel/Palestine conflict

The legal framework is complex but can help colleges strike a difficult balance between freedom of speech and ...

JL Dutaut

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. “A clear focus on delivering and supporting great learning to all adults across their lives will bind and unite the diverse voices, interests and organisations.

    What we need is for employers and practitioners and the organisations which represent them to come together to make this work on behalf of the adults and young people who are served by the sector.”

    I think an important element in bringing employers to the table could be having them represented on the Board that makes the decisions. There has been too much of Educators believing that they have ‘listened’ to the views of employers but in reality, haven’t heard what was being said. The evidence for that is everywhere – frameworks, funding, practices, systems, procedures that don’t meet business needs but which are rigidly continued, year after year, in the face of minimal engagement of the business community. Senior College managers may not believe their role is to serve the needs of business, instead it is to serve the needs of students. Guess what – those students are at College to improve their chances of getting work – even if many of them are using College as a delaying tactic to entering the Big Bad World the Taxpayer is sending them to College to improve their chances of getting work!

    If the FE sector is going to be truly relevant there are some significant sacred cows that are going to have to be put to slaughter. Does the FE sector have the courage, the vision and the belief to do that? We will see.