Ofsted has been accused of “moving the goalposts” for colleges following a damning annual report that pointed to a threefold increase in the number of colleges judged inadequate.

Association of Colleges (AoC) chief executive Martin Doel hit out at the education watchdog after its report highlighted how 13 colleges received the lowest possible grading in 2011/12, compared with four the previous year and how, for the second year running, no college achieved an outstanding grade for teaching and learning.

Ofsted further questioned college governance, monitoring of apprenticeships, the “relatively small” growth in the number of apprenticeships among under-19s and said there was a “real danger” that increased subcontracting would dilute quality.

But Mr Doel said that colleges had been doing what government asked of them and questioned the “transparency” of the new inspection regime — brought in from September — and the “relevant experience” of inspectors.

“If the goalposts are being shifted by Ofsted, we at least need to know the rules of the new game.”

“The annual report no longer represents a state-of-the-nation view of provision, but rather a snapshot of inspections that are now triggered by a risk-based approach. By definition this is skewed towards more negative results,” he said.

But he admitted that, “without doubt”, the report included difficult messages for the sector.

“Every AoC college is committed to doing the best that it can for its students and is committed to achieving continuous improvement,” added Mr Doel.

“Colleges are delivering what government has asked of them and we are interested to discuss how college performance might be better reflected in a wider basket of measures.

“But if the goalposts are being shifted by Ofsted, we at least need to know the rules of the new game. A fair and transparent inspection regime makes an important contribution to this process.”

He further said that there was too little data in inspection reports to provide this transparency or the information required by colleges, parents, employers and potential students.

“We have further concerns about the relevant experience of some Ofsted inspectors and that the inspections do not give a true reflection of the whole of a college’s provision,” he said.

The wider Ofsted annual report was based on the findings of nearly 25,000 inspections of early years and childcare, schools, colleges and adult learning and skills.

It said that schools were improving, with year-on-year rises in the proportion of those rated good or better.

In the learning and skills sector, 70 colleges were inspected, with 63 adult and community learning providers and 128 independent learning providers.

“Overall, the quality of provision in the learning and skills sector is not improving,” said the report.

“Almost 1.5 million learners are being supported by providers who are not yet good and some colleges have now been satisfactory for over 10 years.”

Chief inspector Sir Michael Wilshaw called on the government to “shine a spotlight” on the FE sector, branding it a “real concern”.

An Ofsted spokesperson defended the revamped inspection reports, saying they were more “user-friendly,” containing bullet points rather than lengthy pieces of text, declined to comment on the AoC statement.


Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. Maybe colleges do need to improve? The new CIF seems to be finding these currently. We have had an inspection last week and i thought the inspection team was very good and were fair in their judgements.

    • Mike Cooper

      Colleges do indeed need to improve — as do all providers. And that’s irrespective of whether or notthey are graded explicitly as ‘Requires Improvement’. Are those rated as ‘Outstanding’ and ‘Good’ automatically exempt from such considerations? I would certainly hope not — and I would hope they see that themselves, despite the recent linguistic contortions of the Ofsted Grade 3 ‘caption’.

      The point here is that they’re not alone in that. Ofsted and its own approaches also ‘require improvement’, just as my colleague Mick Fletcher indicates here (and in other regards, as well).

      It’s even possible that others involved in the sector do, too: bodies such as SFA, BIS, DfE and so on. However, they and their approaches aren’t really mentioned in the Ofsted Annual Report.

      No-one would really wish to let providers off the hook when it comes to improving, and especially improving ‘outcomes for learners’. But we shouldn’t let the other participants stakeholders in this process off the hook, either.

  2. Just dropping everyone by one grade will not in itself result in better learning outcomes. In the FE sector and the non-academic, skills are key These are not learned by better management of colleges they are taught by experienced artisans who have been educated well in the art of teaching.