Community and culture come first in Norwich

Many leaders wrestle with the challenge of building an effective and coherent team. At City College Norwich, JL Dutaut finds that Corrienne Peasgood has not so much built one as grown one.

Decisions can feel like a high-wire act when you’re in a position of responsibility. Mistakes are visible, and inevitable. “There have to be Jacky moments,” says Jacky Sturman, the executive manager at City College Norwich – with a self-deprecation that I’ve already come to expect from the CCN executive team. “What matters is how you deal with them.”

Outstanding’ would be great for about a week.

A core strength pervades Corienne Peasgood’s team. It’s evident in their humility, how they treat each other, how they go about leading a college with almost 9000 students, and how they approach the many and diverse challenges they face.

Some are challenges they share with other colleges, such as government reforms of curriculum and assessment. Curriculum narrowing in schools has contributed here to a 20 per cent drop in the number of students taking food and hospitality courses. Then, there are those that are accentuated, depending on your locality, your catchment, your place in our fragmented education system.

In the bottom 10 per cent of areas in the country for social mobility, Norwich has a complex demographic. In its highest ward by economic indicators, 86 per cent of children achieve five good GCSEs, including English and maths. In its lowest, only 26 per cent achieve the same results. The city’s average is 44 per cent.

“It’s not an easy place to work,” Julia Buckland, the vice-principal for curriculum and quality, says, “but it is a great place to work”. Sitting next to her, Jerry White, the deputy principal, explains that they need to hire the Norfolk County showground and close most of their main site to administer resits for 1,200 students, close to a third of whom have additional needs. “We have 450 students with educational health and care plans (EHCPs) in our 16-to-18 cohort,” he says, “an equivalent of 12 EHCP reviews a week.”

Helen Richardson-Hulme, the assistant principal for student services, talks of the number of students who are, or are children of, asylum seekers, and the legal ramifications of providing for them. White also cites students excluded from sixth forms because they haven’t achieved high enough grades.

Each example is devoid of any sense of excuse or blame. In fact, Ed Rose, the higher education and apprenticeships director, presents them as a benefit. “It keeps the challenge fresh and the collaboration strong.” When I tell him that this attitude isn’t a given, he shrugs and smiles.

A key refrain throughout the day, and I sense throughout every day at CCN, is that “there is only us!” All the staff are keenly aware that they are the last line of defence against an awaiting cycle of deprivation and hardship that is harmful to individuals and detrimental to their community.

The second refrain I hear throughout my visit is that the staff are “custodians of a very long legacy”. Just three years ago, Norfolk celebrated 125 years of having a college on CCN’s site. It is an event this team took to its heart. Their passion for the college’s community in the widest sense – its past and its future – is evident. A high proportion of the executive team is home-grown and there is real pride in White’s voice when he tells me about the construction students taking part in a unique heritage project on the Norfolk broads.

This rootedness in Norfolk is central to the college’s ongoing success. It empowers the team to make strong pragmatic decisions, such as valuing mergers on whether they will benefit the community, rather than as financial transactions or opportunities to grow for the sake of growth.

Rated “good” across all areas of inspection but one – “provision for learners with high needs”, which inspectors deemed “outstanding” – it is plain that validation by external regulators is not what drives this college’s executive. It is, if anything, an added bonus for work that is its own reward.

“If ‘outstanding’ is the aim, what’s your commitment to the long term? To the community?” asks Rose. “’Outstanding’ would be great for about a week. Then we’d be asking ‘What next?’”

Regarding the new inspection framework, Laura McLean, the director of strategic development, simply says: “It’s business as usual.” Her role is to be the executive’s eyes on the horizon, to see and prepare for what’s rolling in. I get a clear sense that Ofsted’s big sea change this September is more of a ripple than a wave in this part of Norfolk. There are bigger fish to fry.

Four key leadership principles frame how this team operates: their “ways of working”, setting out parameters for professional communication, their high expectations that span everything from comportment to professional ethics, their commitment to the team (“not the one you lead, but the one you’re in”), and their encouragement of entrepreneurialism and professional agency.

It is adherence to these that have led them to abandon all formal lesson observations, and to normalise instead an open-door and supportive culture of learning walks – and they walk the soles off their shoes! It’s all part of an attitude to accountability that is reciprocal. The executive team regularly put out “You said… We did…” literature for staff and students alike. The results for staff are strong retention and low turnover.

But two fundamentals precede all else. First, shared values, chief among them their belief in their community. Second, shared language, the refrains and phrases they all speak.

These are shared by Martin Colbourne, the managing director of CCN’s independent off-shoot, Norfolk Educational Services (NES), which provides the group with non-teaching support services. He talks about the challenge of mergers being to rebuild morale with a clear vision. He is proud that his team is made up of specialists who have the space and trust to do their work so that he can do his. He is equally proud that all 250 NES staff are on the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) and haven’t been forced on to a lower provision.

They are shared too by Emily Staley, the president of the student union and full member of the executive team. She arrived from Adelaide in 2015, got her GCSES, then her health and social care qualifications, and became the college’s women’s officer, leading a successful campaign to support young women in period poverty. Her passion for civic leadership awakened, she now sits as an equal in all executive meetings. Daunting? Yes. “But I can say what I want there and then.” She ensures, in her own words, that “students govern”.

Elaine Dale, the director of SEND support and college nursery, explains that these values and this language emanate from a “creative excellence” leadership development programme the college ran in 2010. “We realised quickly that inclusion wasn’t limited to SEND, but had to be about a culture of inclusion for everyone.”

It isn’t simply a way of working that a visitor encounters here. You walk into a culture. It has roots. It has had time and space to grow, to take wrong turns, to overcome challenges and to keep going. It reaches for the sky while nurturing its soil. I ask Peasgood, the chief executive, what she thinks the secret ingredient to her team’s coherence and drive are. Her answer: “Success comes from culture. My job is to make that culture part of everyone’s DNA.”

It’s not an easy place to work, but it is a great place to work.

And despite her humility – because, in fact, of her humility – it is clear how she has achieved it. The belief in Norfolk’s community and the language of “zero blame” are hers. Talking the talk is the easy bit, and walking the walk is harder, but for Peasgood, it’s important to go further still. “It’s not just what you say, but how you say it,” she says. To lead like that truly is a very visible high-wire act, and that’s why you need a strong safety net. In her executive team, she has exactly that.

Cash-strapped college appoints accountant as interim principal

A financially troubled college being looked into by the FE Commissioner has appointed an experienced FE leader and chartered accountant as its interim principal.

Diane Dimond, who retired from the Ofsted grade two Petroc College last month after being at the helm since 2015, will take the reins at Richmond-upon-Thames College on 1 October.

Her appointment comes after former principal Robin Ghurbhurun left in July for “personal reasons”, around the same time of a visit from the FE Commissioner amid financial concerns.

FE Week understands the commissioner’s routine diagnostic assessment of the college was elevated into a more comprehensive inquiry, and a report on his findings is due to be published in the coming months.

A college spokesperson has today confirmed: “Richmond-upon-Thames College is working closely with the FE Commissioner’s office with a view to ensuring the future success of the college.”

Dimond led Petroc when it was named college of the year in FE Week’s NICDEX league table in 2018. Prior to joining Petroc in 2011, she was the director for finance at New College Swindon, a job she held for four years.

The Richmond-upon-Thames College spokesperson said Dimond is a qualified teacher as well as a chartered accountant, and has a “strong track record of driving and maintaining good and outstanding financial health in the colleges she has worked for”.

Dimond is undertaking the role through her new job as a management consultant for FE Associates.

The FE Commissioner’s inquiry into RuTC comes after it generated a £2.4 million deficit in 2017/18.

Between November 2016 and April 2017, the college had to make use of an overdraft facility of £750,000, which was fully paid back in May 2017.

On top of that, it has seen a 47 per cent decline in 16 to 18 learner numbers between 2014/15 and 2018/19, which equates to a 38 per cent decline in funding over that period, according to ESFA allocations.

But this did not stop work starting on a new £80 million campus building in June 2018.

The spokesperson said: “The first phase of the new campus development is on track for completion this academic year.”

RuTC has boasted this first phase of the project would include a TV studio, theatre, 3D prototyping fabrication laboratory, art gallery, 60-cover silver service Chef’s Academy with views over Twickenham, spa and wellness centre, sports centre and digital golf studio.

RuTC was previously in FE Commissioner-led financial intervention from November 2015 until July 2016.

Last week it was announced that Ghurbhurun will soon take up a role as managing director of further education and skills at education technology company Jisc.

After he left RuTC, he was replaced by deputy principal Jason Jones on an interim basis; Jones will return to his previous job once Dimond starts.

Sponsored: Qualifications face the biggest shake up in a generation – time to have your say

Talk to anyone in the awarding industry and they will tell you that the only constant is change. The sector has already responded to government and a raft of regulatory reforms by developing innovative new ways of meeting evolving learner, skills and employer needs, across the UK.

Awarding bodies are making big investments in the apprenticeship reforms, by undertaking the lion’s share – over 65% – of end-point assessments against the new standards.

Over the past 5 years the number of vocational certificates issued by FAB members in England has declined by 2.2 million, to just over 5 million per annum. There was a 19% decrease in Level 2 qualifications and a 62% decrease in Level 1/Level 2 qualifications

We now know from various government commissioned reviews, that this decline in qualifications has had a negative impact on social mobility. It has fuelled the concern in some communities that the ‘skills ladder’ of opportunity is being kicked away.

The government’s post-16 Level 3 and below review of qualifications has the potential to make an already difficult situation for learners, far worse.

It is why the Federation comes together with the industry and our stakeholders every year to debate the latest policy and sector developments. Our theme this year is ‘diversity and choice in qualifications’, because we believe a dynamic and competitive qualifications marketplace is in the best interests of learners and the wider economy.

Please join us at FAB2019 and have your say!

FE Week are the Official Media Partner for FAB 2019. To find out more about the conference visit: https://awarding.org.uk/conferences/fab2019/

(Main image: Former skills minister, Rt Hon. Anne Milton MP, addressing the FAB conference 2018. )

 

Parents are key to unlocking HE potential

Parents are the most important influencers when a student decides about higher education, says Bart Shaw. It’s time to get them on board

As enrolment season ends and students get into the groove of their courses, keen eyes will already be looking to the horizon for what comes next. Efforts to support students from under-represented groups into higher education need to start early, and they need to be well-focused and evidencebased.

But competing pressures – not least dramatic budget cuts across the sector – make that job increasingly challenging. It’s time to call in the reinforcements.

When it comes to students’ decisions about HE, our research shows that parents are the most important influencers. Students are looking for advice that takes into account their own personalities and that is grounded in a deep understanding of what might suit them as individuals. Unsurprisingly, family members are best placed to do this. Advice from external sources is less likely to hit the mark.

When it comes to students’ decisions about HE, parents are the most important influencers.

Over the past few years, we have spoken to hundreds of students about their next steps. They have consistently emphasised that their parents are their most trusted sources of information and often the “makers or breakers” for students weighing options. Students in Teesside, for example, explained that their sense that colleges or universities are “selling” HE courses was a major turn-off.

Many parents can hold sceptical views about HE, sometimes based on misconceptions. Our 2018 report on parental engagement with university outreach showed that although most, regardless of socio-economic group, want their children to go to university, they also have deep fears about debt, living costs and employment prospects. While colleges can and should address gaps in students’ knowledge about HE, the messages students receive at home will either reinforce or undermine any such efforts. That is why it is crucial to work with parents to understand their concerns and develop their knowledge. This is particularly the case when working with students whose parents do not have first-hand experience of HE. Colleges should think about three main things.

First, they should help parents plan ahead for conversations about HE. There’s no better time than the present to provide basic information about pathways their college courses might lead on to, and the basics about the language of HE. For example, what is an apprenticeship? What are the differences between different levels of apprenticeship? What is the difference between HE and FE? What is the difference between a foundation degree and other degrees? What do BA and BSc mean?

Next, colleges should provide detailed support around some of the things parents worry about most. Gaps in knowledge about finance, living away from home and job prospects can drive inequitable access further down the line.

Colleges therefore need to address common worries such as whether students will struggle to complete their HE course if they take part-time work, or the perceived pressure from student debt to take a low-paid job after graduation.

Finally, and perhaps hardest of all, colleges should work with universities to make sure parents are included in widening participation activities. Visits to universities should include an option for parents to come along where appropriate, and colleges can work with universities to offer parents’ sessions within the college.

The University of Bath, for example, builds activities for parents into its outreach programme, and provides contact details to allow parents to access advice at times that suit them. Given many low-income parents’ unpredictable and complex work patterns, such opportunities need to be offered many times throughout the day.

The solution to the problem of widening participation is standing on our doorsteps. Supporting students in their decision-making around HE means supporting their parents at the same time. It might mean doing some things differently, but with parents fighting on our side, there’s no destination on the horizon that can stay out of students’ reach.

The government must take steps to reform the apprenticeship levy

Government policy on apprenticeships is not working as intended, says John Cope. What’s needed is further (and urgent) reform

Employers invest more than £44 billion a year in training and are, more than ever, passionate supporters of apprenticeships. They all agree that the apprenticeship levy helps to plug skills gaps, especially given the focus on delivering more of the high-quality training that firms need to succeed. But it’s two years since the levy was introduced and apprenticeship starts are down 31 per cent. It’s clear that government policy is not working as intended, especially for young people and smaller firms.

Common problems hold many firms back, such as small, independent companies going to local training providers and being told the money has run out, to large levy-paying employers struggling with the complexity and inflexibility of the system.

Despite its rocky start, employers want to support the government’s efforts to evolve the system and play their part in making the levy work. That’s why this week, the CBI published a new report, Learning on the job: Improving the apprenticeship levy, outlining four urgent steps the government must take to reform the system and make the apprenticeship levy a success.

First, firms rightly expect transparency around levy receipts and expenditure. They are confused and crying out for clarity on how their levy funds are being used.

They read speculation in the papers that the levy is overspent, but are themselves struggling to utilise their levy funds for training – something that feels totally paradoxical. It’s essential to be more open with employers about how the levy system is working, what’s being funded, and how their contributions are being spent. This includes clarity on levy money covering the apprenticeship provision for nonlevy payers.

Second, companies want the apprenticeship levy system to become more user-friendly – whether that’s helping smaller businesses switch to the National Apprenticeship Service, or much better guidance on the 20 per cent off-the-job rule so it doesn’t act as a barrier.

The levy risks becoming a roadblock to modernisation

The CBI also wants more locally-led “matching services” that allow large firms to pass on levy funds to their supply chains where appropriate.

In the West Midlands, local leaders are already making those crucial connections between SMEs and levy-paying firms. Since the initiative launched in March, large firms have supported more than 70 apprentices in the region.

In Greater Manchester, the combined authority has set up an online portal to link smaller businesses short of the necessary capital to invest in training with big local employers with the capacity to help.

There is no reason these successful projects can’t be replicated.

Third, given the financial press on the levy, making it sustainable is becoming more and more urgent. By introducing an immediate £100 million annual government top-up to the levy budget, employers can continue using the scheme in the short to medium term to take on apprentices of all ages and skill levels.

Without this, there’s a serious risk that the status quo can’t be sustained. Uncertainty is starting to undermine confidence in the apprenticeships brand with the potential, if it continues, to make employers rethink their programmes.

Finally, companies want the government to launch the public consultation promised in last year’s budget about the levy’s future. Reform was initially scheduled for 2020. That is just three months away.

Many companies want the apprenticeship levy to broaden into a more flexible “skills levy” to allow them to deliver more high-quality training that helps to grow their business and gives people successful careers. Such a change would involve an honest conversation, given the potential trade-offs and funding issues. That conversation needs to be had.

Without this urgent action set out in the CBI’s report, especially on transparency, the apprenticeship levy risks becoming a roadblock to the government’s wider and welcome efforts to modernise the skills system for employers and employees alike.

 

Rethinking education in the era of the talent economy

A learner-driven revolution in education is unfolding around the world, says Rod Bristow, as Pearson launches its inaugural Global Learner Survey.

The new study captures the opinions of learners worldwide, but are we ready to hear them?

Technology, automation, globalisation and an unpredictable political environment are affecting everything about our world – especially work and education.

To meet the demands of this new world of work and a fast-changing economy, learners tell us they are in turn demanding more from traditional institutions that have shaped learning for generations, and are looking for a different approach to education that is more practical, hands-on and skillsbased to help prepare them for the changing environment.

Pearson conducted a survey of over 11,000 learners in 19 countries across the world, including both developed and emerging markets. It provided learners with the opportunity to voice their opinions on the current and future state of education. We believe it is the first time the collective voice of global learners on such a wide range of education topics has been heard.

There is a huge opportunity here for FE colleges to grow and evolve

Around the world, learners still place a great deal of faith in education to help them achieve success, but the way they are obtaining an education is changing, and it is all because the new talent economy has arrived with gig jobs, unconventional career paths and tech disruption.

This opens a new universe of opportunities to help people learn in more accessible and affordable ways, and with better outcomes. The learners in our survey embrace technology and online learning. They want more career-focused education, soft-skills training and bite-sized learning across the course of their lifetime.

Virtual learning, micro and stackable credentials, and on-demand learning for everyone can help meet the needs of today’s sophisticated learner. Governments, educational institutions, employers and social and tech disruptors are uniquely positioned to apply their vast and unique expertise to help drive this change.

The smartest of these innovators already know what the learners in our survey have said: traditional career paths are increasingly outdated. With increasing pressure for education to deliver learning and employability outcomes, learners want colleges and universities to offer opportunities to develop softer skills and more choices for adult learners. There is a huge opportunity here for FE colleges to grow, evolve and provide services for a whole new generation of learners who need education over the course of their lifetime.

Universities are well positioned to use their vast expertise to re-imagine the learning opportunities they offer with online courses and degrees.

More employers now see education as an employee benefit, like healthcare for example. Career-focused learning, like BTEC, is providing people with more options than ever before when choosing their career pathways.

But we cannot stop there. We need to build a wider ecosystem to meet the needs of the learners in our survey.

Colleges and universities should expand access to mid-career adults with short courses, soft-skills training and stackable credentials. Employers should be working with them to re-skill more of their workforce. We should use technology to make education engaging and accessible, and government must help address ways to make education more affordable and widely available. Most importantly, we need to better understand the learner voice.

Learners are clear that they value their education but are exploring a variety of options to get it. The advances of the 21st century have given us the greatest opportunity in human history to improve lives through education. Our survey starts this conversation, but there is still a long way to go.

Principal’s £150k expenses revealed… finally

Ministers have ordered the FE Commissioner to investigate a principal’s “deeply concerning” corporate credit card use after her college was forced by FE Week to reveal £150,000 was spent in just four years.

Over 500 receipts obtained by this newspaper following a year-long freedom of information battle with Highbury College have lifted the lid on the lavish spending of its boss Stella Mbubaegbu.

College funds were spent on first class flights and five-star hotels in London and around the world.

“I have already asked the FE Commissioner to urgently look into this matter”

She racked up a £350 bill – including a £45 lobster and nearly £100 on cocktails – at a Michelin star restaurant.

Mbubaegbu also travelled in luxury cars, including a Cadillac and “executive chauffeurs” and spent £434 on a pair of headphones.

It comes at a time of redundancies at the college, in Portsmouth, which axed its sixth form two months ago, amid deteriorating finances and its Ofsted grade plunging from ‘outstanding’ to ‘requires improvement’. The last time staff got a pay rise was in January 2013.

Department for Education minister Lord Agnew, who oversees the FE Commissioner, said he and education secretary Gavin Williamson were “deeply concerned by these revelations”.

“I have already asked the FE Commissioner to urgently look into this matter,” he added.

“School and college leaders must treat taxpayers’ money with the utmost care and in a way that benefits their students. Where this does not happen we take the strongest possible action.”

The college’s board appears to have recognised the excessive spending. Minutes published from a meeting in May show they have restricted international and first class travel, as well as banning lunch and alcoholic drink claims.

A £2,000 limit has now been placed on the principal’s corporate card. The college would not say whether this was a monthly or annual limit.

A college spokesperson said the expenses released to FE Week were “approved and authorised and were then subject to independent audit, as is usual practice”.

The receipts acquired and analysed by this newspaper covered the academic years 2014/15 to 2017/18.

The highest spend was for travel – totalling over £70,000. That included first or business class flights and trains, as well as luxury car rides including in Cadillacs.

Mbubaegbu claimed for over 30 flights, 17 of which cost over £1,000 – with an average of £3,170 – to several destinations for an annual conference in the USA, as well as trips to Canada, India, Germany and Dubai.

The most expensive single flight was for £6,202, purchased on May 3, 2018, to Saudi Arabia – where the college runs Jeddah College.

The findings prompt questions over the extent of international travel, as the college does not have ventures in the majority of the countries visited. FE Week is investigating this further.

The college refused to say if any of the flights were not first class.

Receipts from the principal’s travels also show taxi rides including the use of “executive chauffeurs”.

The £356 Michelin star restaurant receipt

One shows that after landing in London Heathrow on November 16, 2016, Mbubaegbu paid £175 for a firm called Connect Executive Cars to take her to the Hilton Birmingham Metropole hotel, while another firm, Aqua Cars, picked up her luggage and took it back to her home address in Hampshire.

Accommodation was the second highest expenditure. In total she spent more than £60,000 on hotel stays and reached Hilton Diamond status – which typically requires 60 or more night bookings in a single year.

Hotels were mostly four or five stars and ranged from stays across America, Canada, Germany, South Africa, Dubai, China and Saudi Arabia, to four separate nights at the Portsmouth Marriott Hotel – located less than a 10-minute drive away from the college and 20 minutes from her home address.

The principal’s international trips haven’t gone unnoticed by staff as the board minutes from May state: “Staff wanted management, especially the principal, to be more visible within the college. Staff wanted to feel valued and heard.

“The chair believed morale was low and that staff felt disempowered.”

A chunk of expenses were claimed for activities in England. In July 2018, the principal spent £356 for a meal with three other guests at Quilon, a Michelin star restaurant in London.

The receipt shows that the drinks bill alone, including cocktails such as mojitos and margaritas, cost over £100. A £45 lobster main course was also included in the order.

The day before the meal Mbubaegbu travelled to London and stayed at the Hilton Hotel in Euston for one night at a cost of £313. On the night of the meal she checked into the five-star Conrad St James hotel in Westminster. Her one-night stay cost £385.

Another standout monthly corporate card expense, for November 2016, shows that Mbubaegbu purchased BeoPlay H8 Headphones at an Apple Store in Washington, America for $528 (£434).

Elsewhere, in January 2015, she paid for a $655 (£445) dinner for six people at Ruth’s Chris Steak House while out in Orlando. It included a $56 (£44) bottle of Kim Crawford Sauvignon Blanc and multiple $50 (£40) ribeye steaks.

The principal’s card was also used to purchase a £219.99 Kenwood dishwasher from Curry’s on September 11, 2017. The college would not say whether this was bought for personal or college use.

Multiple books for the senior leadership team were also bought on Mbubaegbu’s corporate card, including one single £750 purchase for 50 copies of Mission: How the Best in Business Break Through.

Other titles of some of the books include: Governance of Financial Management and Check The Ego: Operate with a high degree of humility by admitting mistakes and taking responsibility.

Highbury College’s latest accounts, for 2017/18, show a deficit of £2.48 million and state that its financial position has “deteriorated over the last three years”.

The board minutes from May 2019 state there “was a very limited safety net if cash ran out”.

They added that “in the light of budgetary constraints”, all foreign travel must now be authorised by the chair or vice-chair; all travel to be 2nd class unless authorised by the chair/vice-chair; and no lunch claims or alcohol claims can be made.

The college spokesperson added that Highbury “maintains continuous review of its procedures” to ensure that it “achieves good use of public money to meet the needs of our students and the community”.

The college declined to comment on whether any of the expenses were reimbursed by the principal.

Highbury College blocked its staff from accessing FE Week’s website in January after we reported published board minutes had revealed its lawyers were trying to recoup a £1.4 million debt in Nigeria.

The college lifted the block following outcry from then skills minister Anne Milton and chief Ofsted inspector Amanda Spielman, and after the Press Gazette reported the hypocrisy of a college restricting access to the media whilst promoting high quality journalism courses.

The college also attempted to keep the expenses a secret by refusing our FOI request, a decision that the information commissioner investigated and then overturned.

Agnew said: “The attempt to block disclosure in this instance, which was rightly overturned by the information commissioner, was shocking and FE Week should be commended for their dogged pursuit in this matter of public interest.”

Mbubaegbu as the principal of Highbury College 18 years ago, and was awarded a CBE in the 2008 New Year Honours for services to further education.

 

Halton report is useful precedent as Atkins gets to work

The FE Commissioner, Richard Atkins, is now being sent in to investigate the use of Highbury College’s principal’s corporate card.

Atkins was a college principal when the government funding agency investigated “extravagant” college credit card spending at Halton College 20 years ago.

So in terms of a precedent, it is well worth dusting off the ‘Report of the Investigation into Alleged Financial Irregularities at Halton College’ published in April 1999.

The report author, David Melville, chief executive of the Further Education Funding Council, wrote: “I have identified a number of inappropriately extravagant items of expenditure on certain trips…staying in expensive hotels, eating in restaurants with costly food and wine, and incurring excessive or unnecessary expense. None of this expense has been properly related to the benefit of the college…I find that expenditure on college credit cards was not adequately controlled.”

But like Highbury in recent months, the Halton board had begun to tackle the problem.

“I am pleased to note that the college has now amended the financial regulations to state that the use of college credit cards should be reduced to an absolute minimum and that expenditure on credit cards should be claimed with the same receipting procedures and with the same frequency as any other expenses claim.”

The Halton report concluded that: “The level of accommodation or class or means of travel, whilst appropriate to business needs, should not be capable of being regarded as lavish. In addition, colleges should ensure that the use of college credit cards is covered by their financial regulations and monitored carefully.”

And “the findings of these investigations indicate that the principal has not properly discharged his duties as accounting officer of the college, and therefore raise sufficient doubt for the board to consider his future as principal of the college”.

Shortly after publication, the BBC reported on 15 April 1999 that the principal and deputy principal had “resigned after a damning report on its finances”.

“Martin Jenkins and Jenny Dolphin quit their posts at Halton College in Widnes, Cheshire, with immediate effect,” it said.

“They left, citing ill health, within 24 hours of the publication of a report which found the college was unable to justify spending more than £6m of public money.”

In September 1999 the BBC reported the college auditors had been sacked after further investigations by the National Audit Office and Public Accounts Committee hearing.

And in 2006 Halton College and Widnes and Runcorn Sixth Form College merged to create Riverside College.

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 290

Your weekly guide to who’s new and who’s leaving.


Rachel Musson, Chair of audit (designate), Education and Training Foundation

Start date: December 2019

Concurrent job: Founder and owner, Positively Resourceful

Interesting fact: She has recently returned from a year-long sabbatical taking in over 22 different countries around the world.


Peter Latchford, Chair (designate), Education and Training Foundation

Start date: October 2019

Concurrent job: Chief Executive, Black Radley Ltd

Interesting fact: He likes to oil paint in his spare time.


Diane Dimond, Managing consultant, FEA

Start date: August 2019

Previous job: Principal and CEO, Petroc

Interesting fact: Diane lived in the Charente-Maritime region of France for a couple of years.


Nicola Rosewarne, subject leader for performing and production arts, Plymouth College of Art

Start date: August 2019

Previous job: Programme leader for HE performing arts, City College Plymouth

Interesting fact: While playing the role of Persephone, she had to abseil down a tin mine, in the dark, wearing a ball gown and singing a Japanese Enka song.

Flagship national college plans to ‘dissolve’ despite DfE bailouts

One of the five government flagship national colleges plans to “dissolve” and hand over its courses to a college and private training provider after failing to recruit enough students, FE Week can reveal.

National College Creative Industries was set up in 2016 with £5.5 million of government funding, and despite bailouts to stay afloat is now consulting on moving to a licensing model in which it quits as a provider.

Under the plans Access Creative College will take over running the apprenticeships, while South Essex College will take over classroom provision and the running of The Backstage Centre, the commercial production and rehearsal venue where NCCI is based.

A spokesperson for the NCCI said “the existing FE Corporation will dissolve to form a new Company Limited by Guarantee and deliver provision through its partners, this is similar to the successful model demonstrated by the National College for Nuclear.

“The National College vision will continue to be promoted and strengthened through the new legal structure.”

A new company, NCCI Ltd, will “steer the development of new curriculum at higher levels to address sector needs, while also ensuring the quality of its licenced provision”, added the spokesperson, much like the Baker Dearing Trust manages licences for university technical colleges.

Sue Dare, NCCI’s interim principal, said: “We are aiming for a seamless transition to our new way of working and are confident that these new arrangements will enable us to continue to improve our delivery and support for employers, apprentices and learners, while also enabling us to extend our capacity and reach for creative industries employers across the country.”

Its plans will need sign-off from the Department for Education of they are to go ahead on January 31.

Angela O’Donoghue, the principal of South Essex College, said the partnership would “create further opportunities to engage with providers from across the sector,” and would make The Backstage Centre “a magnet for industry and industry training in the southeast”.

NCCI started to look for partner organisations after it made it through 2017-18 as a “going concern” after a £600,000 bailout from the Department for Education, as FE Week reported in June.

It also received a £1.25 million working capital loan, £745,000 of which was paid out during 2017-18, with the remaining £505,000 drawn down in 2018-19.

The DfE also reprofiled loans and deferred the repayment start date from March 2019 to March 2023.

NCCI opened in 2016 as one of five centres the government promised would train an estimated 21,000 students by 2020 in “industries central to the productivity agenda such as digital and high-speed rail”.

Yet NCCI started with just 16 learners and has struggled to meet its target of 1,000 learners a year since then – recruiting only 167 between May 2018 and May this year.

The DfE revealed in a written answer in May that NCCI was looking for potential partners as part of a structure and prospects appraisal.

The National College for High Speed Rail has also had to move from its original model and is looking to change its name to the National College for Advanced Transport and Infrastructure to broaden its offering.

This is after it needed a £4.55 million DfE bailout to avoid being unable to sign off its 2017-18 accounts.

The National Colleges for Digital Skills and Nuclear are both open, but the National College for Onshore Oil and Gas has not started yet.

The DfE, which has sunk £80 million into the colleges, late last year launched an evaluation of the scheme.