Awarding organisations are perfectly placed to break barriers to LLE 

DfE permanent secretary, Susan Acland-Hood recently acknowledged significant hurdles along the way to the first delivery of Level 4 and 5 courses via the newly remaned Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE) in 2025. One of these is the establishment of a third registration category by the higher education regulator, the Office for Students (OfS) which providers and awarders of short courses or modules will require to be eligible for funding via the LLE.

To be ready for delivery in autumn 2025, the OfS will need to publish the new regulations for this category and set up a process for providers to apply for registration. Providers relying on this registration will need to have completed the process well ahead of launching courses so that they can confidently advertise their programmes. Many will be holding back on planning provision until some outline of the regulatory requirements are available. 

However, Awarding Organisations (AOs) are already well placed to act as the conduit between students and education providers to assure quality and standards. Instead of – or as well as – registering providers for LLE provision through OfS, explicitly endorsing the existing role of AOs could open up LLE-powered provision rapidly. It would also negate any additional regulatory burden in time for the launch in 2025. After all, they are already held to account by Ofsted and IfATE for the quality of provision through FE colleges and other centres.

This model is already successful for regulating arguably higher-stakes assessments such as GCSEs and A Levels and could expedite the approval process for the OfS’s new ‘third category’ of providers. This could particularly benefit smaller and specialist providers who might resist the demands of additional regulatory burden.  

In addition to reducing regulatory burden, such an approach would help drive investment in and sector-wide marketing of LLE programmes to create awareness and demand for short modular credit-bearing programmes.  

Giving existing AOs a greater role in the LLE is one of eight recommendations in Pearson’s recently published policy Spotlight on the Lifelong Learning Entitlement. The Spotlight includes public polling and feedback from expert roundtables.  

LLE represents a genuinely pivotal shift

The Spotlight also recommends launching a multi-channel awareness campaign to drive demand and share clear information and guidance for interested individuals, particularly those who might be hesitant to take out income-contingent loans without a full understanding of the commitment they are taking on.

The polling is clear that adults in the target market, typically already in work and with family and financial commitments, currently have low appetite for loans and low understanding of the repayment terms which vary according to salary benefits gained.

Other recommendations go to the heart of the design of the LLE, for example reducing the 30-credit minimum to broaden access to shorter courses and micro-credentials.

Similarly, the requirement for LLE modules to be nested into ‘parent’ qualifications could be relaxed to ensure providers can respond in an agile way to fast-moving technological advances such as generative AI. 

Not surprisingly, our research also concluded that it is vital that support and funding for Level 3 learning remains in place after Advanced Learner Loans are absorbed into LLE. Those who would benefit most from upskilling might struggle to access Level 4 or 5 programmes without improved progression pathways from Levels 1 to 3. 

Many respondents also emphasised that the success of LLE hinges on the seamless transfer of credits between different providers. Questions about the value of credits from different institutions, recognition of prior learning and the alignment of credit levels have yet to be resolved. This will require extensive collaboration between providers.  

The requirement for standardised transcripts for all LLE-funded modules offers a unique opportunity to reimagine how we record learners’ journeys. Using digital skills wallets and blockchain technology could create dynamic and coherent records of individuals’ educational achievements.   

This innovation would meet with the public’s desire for tangible and secure certifications and ensures that learners can showcase their incremental learning to employers and for progression to further learning.   

LLE represents a genuinely pivotal shift in how individuals will access education throughout their lives. Such changes are, of course, complex. We hope our recommendations are a step towards overcoming the early hurdles, and look forward to working with the sector to unlock LLE’s full potential.  

Revealed: Funding band changes from IfATE’s ‘top’ 100 review… so far

Funding bands for 18 apprenticeships have been boosted by the government, so far, amid a promised review of the 100 “most-used” apprenticeship standards.

However, questions have been raised about how the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education is deciding which apprenticeships are in scope for the special review, which was pushed for by ministers, as FE Week analysis shows many involved have low starts.

As part of its “crackdown on rip-off university degrees” media push over the summer, the Department for Education committed to “updating 100 apprenticeships in sectors such as construction and healthcare, so they reflect the latest technological advancements and work better for employers and apprentices”.

The IfATE then told the FE sector it would “review the content of 100 of the most-used standards so they reflect technological developments and up-to-date technical skills”.

Those reviews had started in April and the institute pledged to “complete” the 100 reviews by the end of December 2023. To date, the institute has completed 59 reviews but is yet to even identify the other 41 standards.

Of those 59 reviews (see full list below), 18 have included an increase to funding bands. Five have ended up being retired.

The apprenticeship with the biggest funding band increase was the level 6 chartered legal executive, which shot up by £15,000 from £12,000 to £27,000.

The level 2 bricklayer, level 3 assistant accountant, and level 2 hairdressing professional apprenticeships all had increases of £4,000.

Despite its claim that the “most-used” apprenticeship standards would be part of the 100 reviews, 18 of the 59 reviewed so far had zero starts in 2021/22.

Simon Ashworth, director of policy at the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, said: “Unlike other areas, there is a process to enable the regular review of both the content and funding of apprenticeship standards.

“However, as we have pointed out, that process takes far too long. The impact this has had on both provider financial stability and market supply is unacceptable. We are also still awaiting the outcome of some standards from the exceptional funding band review announced at our Autumn conference last year.

“It was positive to initially hear the announcement in July to speed up the review process and commitment to 100 reviews by December 2023, but the 59 standards reviewed to date are by no means the ‘most used’ ones, and to support the IfATE we will be providing a list of standards which we believe need urgent reviewing before December 2023.”

The IfATE told FE Week that several high-volume apprenticeships, including carpentry and joinery, digital technology solutions professional, hairdressing, installation and maintenance technician, bricklayer, assistant accountant and retailer have been reviewed.

However, the “need to take account of a range of factors in prioritising reviews inevitably means that some of the other recently reviewed apprenticeships have not been high volume ones”.

The institute said that beyond the 59 reviews already completed since April, it is “not possible to say definitively which four reviews will be completed by December and contribute to the ‘100 target’ because of the need to involve external stakeholders”.

When prioritising apprenticeship reviews, the institute considers several factors including the time since the last review, its external quality assurance rating, withdrawal rates, start volumes, the existence of any dispensations, and its published target to “green” certain apprenticeships.

Each review involves the institute and employers considering whether an apprenticeship’s content “still fully complies with IfATE policy and meets employer needs”.

This could lead to “outputs ranging from significant changes to the occupational standard and end-point assessment plan, with the potential for a resulting funding band change, through to retirement of an apprenticeship or no change at all”.

Incoming Ofsted chief ‘misled’ MPs

The incoming Ofsted chief inspector has been accused of misleading MPs over claims exclusion rates in his turnaround trust’s schools were “lower than most” in the areas they work.

Analysis by FE Week’s sister publication Schools Week found Outwood Grange Academies Trust’s secondaries excluded twice as many pupils as other schools in some of their regions.

The trust’s chief executive, Sir Martyn Oliver, made the comments to the education committee earlier this month at a pre-appointment hearing. The committee later endorsed him for the top job.

Frank Norris, an education adviser at the Northern Powerhouse Partnership, said the comments “could be viewed by members of the committee to have been misleading and those statements were relied upon by those who voted that he was indeed appropriate to appoint”.

Kim Johnson, the only education committee MP who voted against appointing Oliver, said he should now be “brought back to the committee to answer for his words. Had we heard the truth at the committee, others may have raised similar concerns.”

‘He should be brought back to the committee to answer for his words’

Oliver made the comment after being challenged by MPs over the trust’s high suspension rates. He said: “Our figures for permanent exclusion are lower than most in the areas in which we work.” 

However, Schools Week’s analysis shows OGAT’s 13 secondary schools in the Yorkshire and Humber had a 0.31 exclusion rate, compared to 0.17 across the region’s other secondaries. In the north east, OGAT’s seven secondaries had a 0.64 exclusion rate, compared to 0.3 in others. The trust has four secondary schools in the East Midlands and two in the north west, where its exclusion rates are negligibly smaller (see table). The analysis only looked at secondary schools.

The national permanent exclusion rate for secondary schools was 0.16, compared to 0.33 at OGAT.

An OGAT spokesperson told Schools Week that Oliver was “grateful for the opportunity to clarify his comment”.

“He was comparing permanent exclusion rates between some individual schools in Outwood to some of the other schools in the same LAs [local authorities] which have a similar profile,” they added.

The trust did not provide any analysis or examples to back up the claim.

Schools Week looked at the three councils where OGAT had three or more secondaries in 2021/22. The trust’s schools had higher exclusion rates than other secondaries in two of the areas, with one negligibly higher.

In Wakefield, OGAT’s four secondaries had an exclusion rate of 0.36, compared to 0.24 among the council’s other 15 secondaries.

The trust spokesperson added schools had been “under-performing for years and were some of the most challenging in the system when we took them on. These schools have been transformed by OGAT.

“They now provide academic rigour and high standards in our academies alongside high levels of personalised care and support, and our approach has achieved some of the best Ofsted grades in our schools’ histories, with most ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ – sometimes the only schools rated ‘outstanding’ in the areas we work.”

All OGAT schools also “play a full role in taking permanently excluded children, children educated off site and children directed to us via fair access panels,” the spokesperson added.

Supporters of zero-tolerance turnaround approaches, such as OGAT’s, say short-term rises in exclusions are sometimes a necessary consequence of embedding better behaviour policies to both improve standards, and protect pupils and staff.

However, of OGAT’s 13 Yorkshire and Humber secondaries, the three most recent to join were in 2018 – five years ago. On average, the schools have been with the trust for nine years. In the north east, the average is seven years.

Norris, who has been analysing school performance across the north in his role for the Northern Powerhouse Partnership, said: “This is not sustainable school improvement. High exclusions over a long period of time doesn’t suggest a trust that has got a handle on embedding effective school improvement.”

After a fall during the pandemic, permanent exclusions rose nationally in 2021/22. However, they are still below the peak in 2018/19. However, an investigation by Schools Week last week found many councils have reported further rises last year. Official figures are lagged and will not be published until later in the year.

Temporary exclusions (suspensions) are at their highest rate since recent records began. One in 17 secondary school pupils were suspended at some point in the 2021/22 academic year.

Collective effort can bring college pay back where it needs to be

After campaigning hard all year, we were delighted that in July the Secretary of State for Education secured around £200 million in 2023/24 for colleges and other FE providers to address key priorities, including the recruitment and retention of staff.

The money is significant – and yet not enough.

Significant because it has allowed the AoC to this week recommend that colleges aim to increase pay by 6.5 per cent, in line with the school teachers’ pay award accepted by the teaching unions. Not enough however, because after 13 years of funding cuts, college pay still lags behind schools and industry, and the cost-of-living crisis is still biting hard.

Three things are clear to me. First, we have shown that by a concerted campaign nationally, supported by college leaders across the country, we can win the investment our sector so sorely needs. 

That’s why we have invited the college staff unions to join us in that campaigning and put down their ballot papers – we have shown our resolve to win funding to go into pay and we want staff and union support for that over the coming months and years.

Second, this year’s win must be only the starting point in bringing college pay back to where it should be after years of declining investment by this government and its predecessors. 

The extra money came about because DfE officials and ministers agreed to consider college staff pay alongside teacher pay in schools and recognise that the enormous gap between schoolteachers (£42,000) and college lecturers (£33,000) is not acceptable. That bodes well for the future and our prospects of closing that gap completely.

Third, the mechanism that DfE used to distribute the additional funding has resulted in very different amounts of money available in each college to put into pay. That was inevitable whichever mechanism they used, but we know that some colleges will simply not get enough additional funding to afford our recommended 6.5 per cent. 

That’s why we have also recommended that every college is fully transparent with how much additional funding they have got and how it is being spent on staff. We campaigned saying we needed more money to pay staff better, so we want to show that we meant it.

With a general election on the horizon, we know that we need to influence the thinking and the manifestos of the political parties. 

Investment in colleges was decimated after the 2010 election; let’s all work together now to make sure that is reversed whoever wins in 2024. Staff in colleges deserve it, our communities and employers need it.

AoC advises colleges to match 6.5% school teacher pay rise

The Association of Colleges has advised colleges to “aim” to increase staff pay by 6.5 per cent to help close the “unacceptable” gap between FE and the school sector.

A pay award of 6.5 per cent, to apply to FE staff for the 2023/24 academic year, would match the pay rise accepted by school lteachers earlier this year following unprecedented strike action.

The college recommendation came after the latest round of negotiations between the AoC and the five unions making up the National Joint Forum (NJF), which is calling for a 15.4 per cent pay rise for college staff.

The AoC has until now refused to make a non-binding pay recommendation to its members until extra funding had been provided by ministers.

The representative body said today that colleges should use all of their cut of the £200 million government 16 to 19 funding boost announced in July to fund the staff pay boost and “address staff recruitment and retention challenges”.

Announcing the new funding, Gillian Keegan, the education secretary, told MPs in the House of Commons that she “expects” this extra funding “to go to the front line”.

AoC chief executive David Hughes said: “We have long said that the gap between the school and FE sectors on teacher pay is unacceptable, and it is an enormous step forward that the government has finally accepted their responsibility as funders to put that right.”

The association did acknowledge the “difficult position” colleges with smaller 16 to 19 cohorts face and will likely not be able to afford such a pay recommendation.

That’s because the extra funding, £185 million in 2023/24 and £285 million in 2024/25, is being allocated to colleges through increased programme cost weightings and the per-student funding rate for 16- to 19-year-olds.

Colleges with larger adult or apprenticeship cohorts will therefore struggle to meet the AoC’s recommended 6.5 per cent pay award.

“It [6.5 per cent] will be exceptionally hard for those colleges with small or no 16 to 18s,” said Mark Malcolmson, principal of City Lit, a large adult education college.

“It would have been much fairer if the whole college sector was treated equally.”

College leaders that spoke to FE Week, but wished to be unnamed, said that while there was widespread agreement that the 16 to 18 allocation process was unfair, several would be able to fund a pay award of around 6.5 per cent. 

Others were worried about losing staff to nearby colleges that received an big increase to their 16 to 19 allocation and were concerned about the medium to long-term impact on their budgets.

Gerry McDonald, chief executive of New City College and chair of the AoC’s employment policy group, said he would like to see as many colleges as possible making the 6.5 per cent pay award.

“College leaders do not want pay in colleges to slip even further behind schools and industry roles,” he said.

“However, it is absolutely clear that a number of colleges will not be able to achieve 6.5 per cent because the new funding is simply and transparently insufficient.

“By using the 16 to 18 budget to distribute funds and linking it to high-cost subjects, the additional funding available for college pay as a proportion of overall college turnover varies enormously between colleges. This would make a simple single pay award recommendation difficult to achieve for a large number of colleges.”

Hughes called on the unions to halt striking. 

“My hope is that this funding will be only the first step towards closing the gap over the coming years, but I know that we will need to campaign hard to achieve that,” he said. “That’s why we are asking the unions to campaign with us nationally, rather than taking action locally. We have shown this works.”

Earlier in May, the Association of Colleges doubled down on its refusal to make a pay proposal for next year, as doing so will “let the government off the hook” for funding colleges properly to pay its staff.

Unions are understood to be pressing the AoC to agree to a national pay bargaining framework for the sector and call an end to the annual process of non-binding pay recommendations, which colleges can choose to accept or ignore. 

UCU general secretary Jo Grady said: “Our analysis shows the money is there for college bosses to raise pay and treat staff fairly.

“The money has now arrived to pay our members fairly and a conditional recommendation of 6.5 per cent has been made.”

Last year, the AoC made a 2.25 per cent pay award recommendation, below the 10 per cent demand from unions. It was subsequently rejected. 

UCU is currently balloting union members in 89 colleges to vote for industrial action, which will close on Tuesday 10 October 2023.

Mark’s out the AELP Dawe: Former CEO quits board

Former Association of Employment and Learning Providers chief executive Mark Dawe has resigned as a board member of the membership body.

Dawe, who leads The Skills Network, was re-elected to the AELP board in February but has decided to leave after serving just seven months of his new four-year term.

Over the past two decades, he’s served as a director of the organisation for 12 years. He held the top job at the association from 2016 to 2020.

Dawe said he’s leaving the board as it is a “new phase for AELP with the recruitment of a new chief executive and other changes”.

It comes three months after Jane Hickie stood down as AELP chief executive amid a suspension pending an investigation into her tenure. Hickie was chief operating officer of AELP while Dawe was chief executive and replaced him in the role after he left to lead The Skills Network.

Dawe said: “After eight years as chief executive of AELP and board member, and involvement with the organisation for the past 20 years, I have decided it is time to step down from the AELP board.

“It is a new phase for AELP with the recruitment of a new CEO and other changes, along with a general election looming and new policy to consider. It is therefore an appropriate time to step aside.”

He added that The Skills Network will continue to be an active member of AELP.

An AELP spokesperson said: “AELP and the board want to extend their gratitude for Mark Dawe’s service and dedication over the past eight years, which have played a major role in shaping AELP’s success and growth.

“As an ongoing member of AELP, we look forward to Mark’s future contributions in supporting the sector and AELP.”

The election process for Dawe’s replacement will start in the later part of 2023, with the annual general meeting taking place in the new year, the spokesperson added.

AELP’s board has 13 members, including chair Nichola Hay and vice chair Rob Foultson.

Before joining the AELP, Dawe was the chief executive of exam board OCR for five years.

He had a stint as a college principal before this at Oaklands College and is a former deputy director for FE and adult basic skills strategy at the Department of Education after joining the civil service in 2003.

Careers: Colleges will be ‘expected’ to report Gatsby progress

Schools and colleges will be expected to report their progress against national careers advice benchmarks at least once a year, under plans to beef up statutory guidance.

The Department for Education has also announced plans for a new “strategic action plan for careers”, a single “digital front door” for young people to access guidance online and to eventually create an “all-age careers system, unified under a single strategic framework”.

But ministers have rejected calls for direct funding of careers advisers and extra “numerical targets” for the number of schools and colleges meeting the Gatsby Benchmarks of good careers guidance.

Robin Walker MP
Robin Walker MP

The Parliamentary education committee has published the government’s response to its report into careers advice and guidance in England. Chair Robin Walker welcomed ministers’ “broadly positive response”.

Secondary schools and colleges are currently encouraged to self-report their progress against careers education benchmarks through an online tool called “Compass”.

The committee’s report, published in June, recommended that the DfE “update its statutory guidance to make reporting through the Compass tool compulsory for all secondary schools and colleges”.

At present, 90 per cent of schools and colleges use the Compass evaluation, and 3,172 use “Compass+”, which enables tracking of Gatsby Benchmark achievement “at an individual pupil level”.

The DfE said in its response it wanted to “avoid mandating the use of Compass as a reporting tool”.

But it said it would update statutory careers guidance to “set a clear expectation that all secondary schools and colleges should self-report progress against the Gatsby Benchmarks at least once during every academic year”.

DfE wants ‘unified’ all-age careers system

The committee’s report criticised a “confusing, fragmented and unclear” careers system. Schools and colleges are responsible for providing advice and guidance, overseen by the Careers and Enterprise Company.

Some responsibility also sits with the National Careers Service, and with the Department for Work and pensions and its agencies.

The DfE said it agreed there needed to be “greater coherence between publicly funded careers services, across all ages”.

Its ambition is to “develop an all-age careers system, unified under a single strategic framework, that helps to address the fragmentation in careers services identified by the committee”.

But they “do not have firm views yet on what this will look like but we want to start exploring the issue further”.  Stakeholder and “early market engagement” will begin this autumn.

The first step will be a “single starting point for careers and skills”, launching this autumn.

This “digital front door” will help young people and others find the “trusted impartial careers and skills information that they need”.

User testing of the prototype “has revealed that young people found it useful and would return to it in future”.

National Careers Service website gets a refresh

The government has also launched a “new and inspiring look and feel to the National Careers Service website” to make it more accessible to young people. The new “front door” will be built on this.

“Our goal is to build digital and inperson services which form a unified careers system which best enables citizens to explore and develop their careers, skills and training options at any point in their lives.”

The committee also called for a refreshed careers strategy, which was last updated in 2017. Instead, the DfE said it would publish a “strategic action plan for careers” in 2024. It will set out “strong objectives to continue to increase the number of schools achieving the Gatsby Benchmarks in full”.

But setting additional numerical targets for benchmark achievement “risks encouraging a tick-box approach”, ministers said.

The DfE also rejected a recommendation that it update statutory guidance to “suggest an appropriate proportion of time” that careers leaders should be given to fulfil their role, and a call for schools to report how much time they give to their leaders.

They said there was a “risk that by quantifying an appropriate proportion of time we are creating additional pressure on resources and taking the focus away from other school or college priorities”.

Ministers reject direct funding of advisers

The department also “does not agree” with the committee’s suggestion that it directly-fund school and college careers advisers. It said schools and colleges were “best-placed to determine their own arrangements”.

The committee’s report criticised an administrative “burden” preventing access to work experience.

The DfE said it would “look at what more we can do to address barriers to organising work experience”.

Ministers also agreed with the committee that there was “potential for an online platform that promotes a range of work experience placements both locally and across the country. But again, this is a “longer-term aspiration”.

Beefed-up legislation requiring schools to give alternative education providers access to their pupils came into force earlier this year. The committee said the DfE should “directly track compliance” and ensure “appropriate action” against those failing to comply.

The DfE said schools could already record compliance through the Compass tool, and that the CEC had a “single place for providers to register a concern if they have reason to believe that a school is not complying”.

However, although there have been “lots of requests for clarification and support, there have not been any concerns registered by providers to date through the CEC’s website”.

Retail apprenticeships provider ‘disappointed’ after Ofsted grade 4

An apprenticeship provider that delivers training to high-street retailers such as Peacocks and Dunelm has been hit with an ‘inadequate’ rating following its first full Ofsted inspection.

Northern Training Academy (NTA), based in Bolton, was given a grade four after inspectors found “poor” quality of training being delivered to most apprentices and learners.

The company was inspected in mid-May and had 375 apprentices and 14 adult trainees. It delivers 25 different apprenticeship standards from levels 2 to 6, mostly in retail but also in travel and warehousing.

While leaders and managers were praised for having a “clear rationale” to provide training that meets the post-pandemic skills shortages of local and national employers, inspectors found big concerns with oversight of the training.

Today’s report said too many apprentices are either “behind in their learning or have not achieved their apprenticeships on time”, adding that around a third are “significantly behind in their progress towards achieving their functional skills English and mathematics”.

Leaders were also unaware that apprentices on the level 6 assistant buyer and merchandiser apprenticeship were still in-learning during the inspection.

Ofsted also slammed the quality of NTA’s retail traineeship curriculum. Inspectors found that leaders have halved the time taken to teach trainees since its early monitoring visit in 2021.

The government scrapped traineeships as a stand-alone skills training programme earlier this year amid years of low starts, despite pumping hundreds of millions of pounds into the scheme during the pandemic. Traineeships can still be offered, but they’ve been integrated into adult education budget delivery.

Ofsted said NTA’s traineeship curriculum is “unambitious and does not meet the needs of the trainees”, adding that the retail traineeship does not include any retail-specific topics to help trainees to improve their knowledge of the sector.

Inspectors did however praise NTA’s provision for apprentices on the level 3 travel consultant apprenticeship, who receive an “ambitious curriculum that prepares them well for working in the travel industry”.

Jo Roche, managing director of NTA, said: “While we are disappointed with our grading, we are pleased that the Ofsted report recognises the positive impact of our travel apprenticeship provision.”

She added: “We take pride in our learners and their progress, especially amidst the ongoing challenges in the retail sector following the Covid-19 pandemic. We are committed to addressing these areas and have already taken steps to improve the training and support provided to our learning and development coaches.”

Independent training providers typically have their funding contracts terminated by the Education and Skills Funding Agency following ‘inadequate’ Ofsted judgments.

A spokesperson for NTA told FE Week the ESFA has not been in touch about contract termination “at this point in time”.

RAAC: DfE lists 3 more affected colleges

Crumbly RAAC concrete has forced three more colleges to close parts of their sites, according to the Department of Education.

An updated list of affected schools and colleges was published by the DfE this morning. It shows the number of education settings with RAAC has increased to 174, up by 27 since the list was first published two weeks ago. The new snapshot figures list settings that have confirmed RAAC as of September 14.

Farnborough College of Technology, Grantham College and Marple Sixth Form College – part of The Trafford College Group – have joined Petroc as the only further education colleges that have identified reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) so far.

One specialist post-16 college, Royal College Manchester (Seashell Trust) is also listed.

But all the colleges have their students in face-to-face education, according to the DfE’s list.

Only one affected school has switched to fully using remote learning.

DfE caused ‘significant hinderance’

Farnborough College criticised the DfE’s indecision for causing a “significant hindrance” after identifying RAAC months before DfE began ordering closures.

At first, the college surveyed its buildings which revealed RAAC, but, following the DfE’s standards, found the concrete planks were “generally in good condition” and did not have any cracking, back in July. The surveyors recommended it worked to improve the planks though some parts of the RAAC were “sub-standard”.

In early August the DfE said a technical advisor would visit the college within six weeks to verify the advice. However, on 31 August, just days before the start of term, it received an “urgent request for a meeting” when it was told all colleges with RAAC should close immediately.

Farnborough College told FE Week that it was forced to close 177,000 square feet of its space after the DfE sounded the alarm in August. “A small number” of its adult learners could not come in in the first week due to the RAAC problems, though they have now returned to college. The college has around 3,600 students on its books.

The college also had to re-sequence some courses so that they could continue to offer studies without specialist equipment currently stuck in the building where RAAC has been identified.

It is currently focusing on the theoretical side of the courses, before moving to the technical side once the buildings have been remediated.

The college expects to open seven of the fourteen blocks affected by the end of September, FE Week understands.

Farnborough College expects to spend £800,000 remediating the site, but that should be funded by the DfE. But it expects the full RAAC replacement project to cost “millions of pounds”. The DfE has also indicated that it will fund mitigating costs too.

‘Difficult decision’

Grantham College, which has around 1,200 learners in total, has also been forced to close parts of its campus after a DfE-commissioned survey found RAAC on four buildings in total. That forced a “difficult decision” to close those buildings, the college said on its website.

It has closed the entire Link Block, part of its engineering block, part of the construction workshop and part of its library block.

But the college said it had “adjusted timetables so that face-to-face teaching can continue”. Paul Deane, the college’s principal, said he appreciated the timing of the decision is “far from ideal”.

Trafford College Group, which serves more than 12,000 students across four colleges, has closed part of its Marple Sixth Form College campus including six classrooms. A spokesperson for the college said it had “restrict[ed] access to the affected area while we complete further surveys and if necessary, remedial works”.

“The classrooms affected will not be in use until we are reassured that they are fit for purpose and have passed all necessary health and safety checks,” they added.

The area is isolated on one side of the campus and there have been “no delays” to anyone starting term on time, as there is extra capacity. But it is “too early” to say when the RAAC will be removed from the site.

RAAC surveys are continuing across the country but surveyor shortages have delayed the vital checks in some education settings, including England’s biggest college group, NCG.

The DfE’s full RAAC list

Setting NameLA AreaSetting Mitigation (14/09/2023)
Abbey Lane Primary SchoolSheffieldAll pupils in face-to-face education
All Saints C of E Primary SchoolManchesterAll pupils in face-to-face education
Altrincham CollegeTraffordAll pupils in face-to-face education
Anglo European SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Ark Boulton AcademyBirminghamAll pupils in face-to-face education
Ark John Keats AcademyEnfieldAll pupils in face-to-face education
Arthur Bugler Primary SchoolThurrockAll pupils in face-to-face education
Aston Manor AcademyBirminghamMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
Avenue Centre for EducationLutonAll pupils in face-to-face education
Baildon Church of England Primary SchoolBradfordAll pupils in face-to-face education
Barnes Farm Junior SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Baskerville SchoolBirminghamMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
Batley Girls High SchoolKirkleesAll pupils in face-to-face education
Baynards Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Beehive Lane Community Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Bentfield Primary School and NurseryEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Birchington Church of England Primary SchoolKentAll pupils in face-to-face education
Bishop Douglass School FinchleyBarnetAll pupils in face-to-face education
Bispham Endowed Church of England Primary SchoolBlackpoolAll pupils in face-to-face education
Brandhall Primary SchoolSandwellRAAC not present
Broomfield Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Buckhurst Hill Community Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Buttsbury Junior SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Canon Slade SchoolBoltonAll pupils in face-to-face education
Carmel CollegeDarlingtonAll pupils in face-to-face education
Cherry Tree AcademyEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Chipping Ongar Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Clacton County High SchoolEssexMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
Claydon High SchoolSuffolkMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
Cleeve Park SchoolBexleyAll pupils in face-to-face education
Cockermouth SchoolCumberlandAll pupils in face-to-face education
Colyton Grammar SchoolDevonAll pupils in face-to-face education
Corpus Christi Catholic Primary SchoolLambethAll pupils in face-to-face education
CranbourneHampshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Danetree Primary SchoolSurreyAll pupils in face-to-face education
Denbigh SchoolMilton KeynesAll pupils in face-to-face education
Donnington Wood Infant School and Nursery CentreTelford and WrekinAll pupils in face-to-face education
East Bergholt High SchoolSuffolkMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
East Tilbury Primary SchoolThurrockAll pupils in face-to-face education
Eldwick Primary SchoolBradfordAll pupils in face-to-face education
Elmstead Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Eversley Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Farlingaye High SchoolSuffolkAll pupils in face-to-face education
Farnborough College of TechnologyHampshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Ferryhill SchoolCounty DurhamMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
Godinton Primary SchoolKentAll pupils in face-to-face education
Grantham CollegeLincolnshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Great Leighs Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Great Tey Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Hadleigh High SchoolSuffolkMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
Harlowbury Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Harwich and Dovercourt High SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Hatfield Heath Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Hatfield Peverel St Andrew’s Junior SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Henham and Ugley Primary and Nursery SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Hillhouse CofE Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Hockley Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Holcombe Grammar SchoolMedwayAll pupils in face-to-face education
Holy Trinity Catholic Voluntary AcademyNottinghamshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Holy Trinity CofE Primary School, Eight Ash Green and AldhamEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Hornsey School for GirlsHaringeyAll pupils in face-to-face education
Hounsdown SchoolHampshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Jerounds Primary AcademyEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Joyce Frankland Academy, NewportEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Katherine Semar Infant SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Katherine Semar Junior SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Katherines Primary Academy and NurseryEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
King Ethelbert SchoolKentAll pupils in face-to-face education
Kingsbury High SchoolBrentAll pupils in face-to-face education
Kingsdown SchoolSouthend-on-SeaAll pupils in face-to-face education
Lambourne Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Langney Primary AcademyEast SussexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Lubbins Park Primary AcademyEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Markyate Village School and NurseryHertfordshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Marling SchoolGloucestershireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Maryvale Catholic Primary SchoolBirminghamAll pupils in face-to-face education
Mayflower Primary SchoolLeicesterAll pupils in face-to-face education
Merrylands Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Mersea Island SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Mistley Norman Church of England Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Mulberry Stepney Green Mathematics and Computing CollegeTower HamletsAll pupils in face-to-face education
Myatt Garden Primary SchoolLewishamAll pupils in face-to-face education
Myton SchoolWarwickshireMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
Northampton International AcademyWest NorthamptonshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Ortu Corringham Primary School and NurseryThurrockAll pupils in face-to-face education
Our Lady’s Catholic High SchoolLancashireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Outwoods Primary SchoolWarwickshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Palmarsh Primary SchoolKentAll pupils in face-to-face education
Park View SchoolHaringeyAll pupils in face-to-face education
Parks Primary SchoolLeicesterAll pupils in face-to-face education
PetrocDevonAll pupils in face-to-face education
Pippins SchoolSloughAll pupils in face-to-face education
Prince Albert Junior and Infant SchoolBirminghamAll pupils in face-to-face education
Ravens AcademyEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Redhill SchoolDudleyAll pupils in face-to-face education
Roding Valley High SchoolEssexMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
Royal College Manchester (Seashell Trust)StockportAll pupils in face-to-face education
Sale Grammar SchoolTraffordAll pupils in face-to-face education
Sandbach SchoolCheshire EastAll pupils in face-to-face education
Scalby SchoolNorth YorkshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Selworthy Special SchoolSomersetAll pupils in face-to-face education
Seven Mills Primary SchoolTower HamletsAll pupils in face-to-face education
Shawfield Primary SchoolSurreyAll pupils in face-to-face education
Sir Thomas Boughey AcademyStaffordshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Springfield Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Andrew’s CofE Primary School, Over HultonBoltonAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Anne’s Catholic Primary School, Harlow GreenGatesheadAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Bartholomew’s Catholic Primary School, SwanleyKentAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Bede’s Catholic School and Byron Sixth Form CollegeCounty DurhamMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
St Benet’s Catholic Primary School, OustonCounty DurhamMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
St Clere’s SchoolThurrockMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
St Columba’s Catholic Primary School, WallsendNorth TynesideAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Elizabeth’s Catholic Voluntary AcademyDerbyshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Francis’ Catholic Primary SchoolNewhamAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Francis Catholic Primary School, South AscotWindsor and MaidenheadAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Gregory’s Catholic Science CollegeBrentAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Helena SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Ignatius CollegeEnfieldAll pupils in face-to-face education
St James’ Catholic Primary School, HebburnSouth TynesideAll pupils in face-to-face education
St James’ Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary SchoolKentAll pupils in face-to-face education
St John Bosco Catholic Primary School, Town End Farm, SunderlandSunderlandAll pupils in face-to-face education
St John Catholic Primary SchoolHertfordshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
St John Vianney Catholic Primary School, West DentonNewcastle upon TyneAll pupils in face-to-face education
St John Vianney RC Primary SchoolHaringeyAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Joseph’s Catholic Primary SchoolBuckinghamshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Joseph’s Catholic Voluntary AcademyLeicestershireAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Lawrence Church of England Primary School, RowhedgeEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Leonard’s Catholic School, DurhamCounty DurhamMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
St Mary and St John Junior and Infant SchoolBirminghamAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Michael’s Catholic SchoolBuckinghamshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Paul’s Catholic Primary School, Thames DittonSurreyAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Teresa’s Catholic Primary SchoolDarlingtonAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Thomas More Catholic Comprehensive SchoolGreenwichAll pupils in face-to-face education
St Thomas More Catholic School, BlaydonGatesheadAll pupils in face-to-face education
St William of York Catholic Primary SchoolBoltonAll pupils in face-to-face education
Stanway Fiveways Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Steeple Bumpstead Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Stepney All Saints Church of England Secondary SchoolTower HamletsFully remote learning
Sunny Bank Primary SchoolKentAll pupils in face-to-face education
Surrey Street Primary SchoolLutonAll pupils in face-to-face education
Tendring Technology CollegeEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
The Appleton SchoolEssexMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
The Billericay SchoolEssexMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
The Bromfords SchoolEssexMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
The Coopers’ Company and Coborn SchoolHaveringMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
The Ellen Wilkinson School for GirlsEalingAll pupils in face-to-face education
The FitzWimarc SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
The Gilberd SchoolEssexMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
The Holy Family Catholic School, a Voluntary AcademyBradfordAll pupils in face-to-face education
The Honywood Community Science SchoolEssexMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
The Link SchoolSuttonAll pupils in face-to-face education
The London Oratory SchoolHammersmith and FulhamMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
The Macclesfield AcademyCheshire EastNew case – triage in progress
The Palmer Catholic AcademyRedbridgeAll pupils in face-to-face education
The Ramsey Academy, HalsteadEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
The Thomas Lord Audley SchoolEssexMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
Thomas Bullock Church of England Primary and Nursery AcademyNorfolkAll pupils in face-to-face education
Thurstable School Sports College and Sixth Form CentreEssexMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements
Thurston Community CollegeSuffolkAll pupils in face-to-face education
Marple Sixth Form College (part of Trafford College Group)TraffordAll pupils in face-to-face education
Waddesdon Church of England SchoolBuckinghamshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Wallingford SchoolOxfordshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Water Lane Primary AcademyEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Welbourne Primary SchoolHaringeyAll pupils in face-to-face education
Wells Park SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Westlands SchoolKentAll pupils in face-to-face education
White Court SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
White Hall Academy and NurseryEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Widford SchoolHertfordshireAll pupils in face-to-face education
Winter Gardens AcademyEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Wood Green AcademySandwellAll pupils in face-to-face education
Woodkirk AcademyLeedsAll pupils in face-to-face education
Woodville Primary SchoolEssexAll pupils in face-to-face education
Wyburns Primary SchoolEssexMix of face-to-face and remote arrangements