Did you #askHayes about launch of National Careers Service?

The skills minister was questioned about the new National Careers Service and impartial information, advice and guidance in a live Twitter debate this morning.

John Hayes MP, the first minister from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) to ever take part in a Twitter Q&A, answered questions submitted via the hashtag #AskHayes in 140 characters or less.

“I really enjoyed today’s Q&A and thanks to everyone who participated for making it such a great discussion, it is definitely something I would consider doing again,” Mr Hayes told FE Week.

“I was delighted at the number of responses we received and it shows the depth of passion people have for careers guidance.”

Mr Hayes added: “I wanted to answer everyone’s questions but unfortunately ran out of time.

“If there was anyone I missed out then please do write and I will reply.”

Questions were raised in the session over how a biased or reduced careers advice service, such as from schools with sixth forms, would be monitored and sanctioned by government.

Peter Cobrin, co-founder of Apprenticeships England, tweeted: “What will the Minister do about schools who deny impartial information about alternatives to sixth form study?”

Mr Hayes later replied: “The new law means schools must provide advice that is balanced, including information on vocational options like apprenticeships.”

Similar concerns were voiced by Stephen Exley, a reporter at the Times Educational Supplement (TES), who tweeted: “What stick is there to deter schools with sixth forms offering reduced careers advice to try and keep their students?”

The skills minister reassured Mr Exley that such practice would be against the law.

The new National Careers Service offers an impressive online product, & we expect it to get 20m hits a year! But even more than this, with 3250 locations up & down the country, we estimate 700,000 people will have face-to-face help.

Mr Hayes tweeted: “The new law says schools advice must be independent and impartial.

“What you describe wouldn’t be either.”

The FE loans system, due to be implemented in the 2013/14 academic year, will affect learners aged 24 or above and studying a course at level 3 or higher.

Steph Hulford asked Mr Hayes whether the National Careers Service would be in charge of explaining the system to potential adult learners.

She tweeted: “How will you sell “loans” to adults already concerned about HE funding, will the new service provide financial info?”

The skills minister replied: “Careers advisors will, as part of the package, offer advice on costs and finance.”

Concerns were also raised by Twitter users over the number of face to face advice and guidance sessions available to users through the National Careers Service.

Pam Hewitt, a self employed CV consultant asked: “As an experienced guidance professional I know people want to talk face to face and discuss their futures, not tap on a keyboard.”

I was delighted at the number of responses we received and it shows the depth of passion people have for careers guidance.

The skills minister responded: “The new National Careers Service offers an impressive online product, & we expect it to get 20m hits a year!

“But even more than this, with 3250 locations up & down the country, we estimate 700,000 people will have face-to-face help.”

The live question and answer session coincided with the launch of the National Careers Service, the replacement for Next Steps which will offer information and advice for both young people and adults.

(Note: If you’re not familiar with Twitter, download our beginner’s guide here.)

Work experience essential for preparing next apprentices, says Ofsted

Young people who take part in work experience or vocational study at school are more likely to succeed in an apprenticeship than those who have no exposure to the workplace, a report by Ofsted has revealed.

The education watchdog is calling on the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) to develop “a national set of expectations” for the outcomes of work experience placements, ensuring all young people are prepared for an apprenticeship.

“When preparing post-16s for apprenticeships schools need to provide meaningful work experience,” Matthew Coffey, national director for learning and skills at Ofsted said.

“While the majority of learners are completing their apprenticeships around a quarter are dropping out.

“It is clear that more work experience, vocational study and course tasters are needed to ensure learners are on the right apprenticeship for them and that they understand the demands of work.”

The report asked 15 providers and employers, including Barnsley College, Cornwall College and McDonald’s, how they had successfully recruited young people as apprentices.

Respondents said they needed the transferable skills, such as a professional attitude and a “commitment to employment”, which are picked up and shown by potential apprentices during work experience placements.

“Employers welcomed work experience as a way of evaluating young people’s work ethic,” the report states.

“Young people who had undertaken well-organised work experience, or some form of vocational taster courses while still at school, were more successful in making good progress with their apprenticeship framework than those starting straight from school without such experience.”

Chris Jones, chief executive and director general of City & Guilds, says work experience is a “crucial transition” for young people into the job market.

“Whilst City & Guilds supports work experience to help young people into employment, more needs to be done to create better links between education and employment, so young people are exposed to the world of work while they are still at school and making important choices about their futures,” Mr Jones said.

” Meaningful work experience must be developed with employers and must become be a mandatory part of the school curriculum.”

The Ofsted report says BIS should be improving the availability of careers guidance on post-16 options for young people and also gathering data on those who are unsuccessful when applying for an apprenticeship vacancy.

It also says training providers should be developing more pre-apprenticeship programmes for young people at risk of becoming disengaged with education or employment.

“There has been much concern lately about the quality of apprenticeships,” Mr Coffey added.

“When looking at the national picture we can see that around 70 per cent of apprenticeships are good or outstanding but more needs to be done to improve provision further.

“The apprenticeships for young people best practice report will provide a vast pool of knowledge and examples on how to deliver apprenticeships successfully and will act as a useful guide for trainers, assessors and educational leaders wishing to improve.”

The report later recommends improving the promotion of apprenticeship training to under-represented groups by creating aspirational role models within each provider.

(The “Apprenticeships for young people: A good practice report” can be downloaded here.)

Sector calls for delay to FE loans implementation

Four of the largest organisations representing colleges, staff and students have joined forces to call on the government to delay the implementation of FE loans.

The Association of Colleges (AoC), National Union of Students (NUS), University and College Union (UCU) and UNISON will write to ministers next week arguing that the sector is not prepared for the changes and consequences of the system.

“The government must halt progress on the introduction of fees for college students,” Toni Pearce, NUS vice-president for further education said.

“We’ve all seen the consequences for students when things go wrong with the loans system and the government must not risk that happening again.”

We want an immediate halt to the implementation of the Government’s damaging fees policy or they risk residing over complete chaos and a fees system that is simply not fit for purpose.”

The letters sent to ministers will suggest a “pause” in the introduction of FE loans until there has been a full assessment on the impact of the system and further consultation has been carried out with the sector.

Martin Doel, chief executive of the AoC, said: “We understand that the impact assessment for FE loans will not be published until May, which will be the same time as regulations are brought before Parliament.

“We do not feel this gives stakeholders, nor indeed Parliament, sufficient time to consider the details of the regulations and also take into account the impact assessment.

“Therefore, we feel there is a need for a pause between publication of the impact assessment and the issue of regulations.”

The FE loans system will be introduced for the 2013/14 academic year, with learners applying from next March if they are over 24 and studying at level 3 or higher.

Sally Hunt, general secretary of the UCU, said the system would discourage potential students thinking about studying both at further and higher education.

“At a time of record unemployment the last thing the Government should be doing is putting up even more financial barriers to education,” she said.

“Ministers must listen to the concerns of staff, students and colleges before increasing course fees.”

Jon Richards, UNISON national secretary for education and children’s services, added: “Ministers risk pricing many adult learners out of colleges altogether, just when they need to update their skills to help them find work.

“We want an immediate halt to the implementation of the Government’s damaging fees policy or they risk residing over complete chaos and a fees system that is simply not fit for purpose.”

The call for a delay follows a letter, seen by FE Week and sent by NUS, UCU and UNISON to John Hayes MP last month, expressing concerns about the proposed loans system and the speed at which it is being introduced.

The letter requests an “urgent meeting” with the minister and an indefinite delay until “a concrete and tested plan can be put forward”.

It also expresses concerns about the Student Loans Company (SLC) and its capacity to cope with the further education sector, a far more complex and diverse system than in higher education.

“in previous years there have been numerous, high-profile complaints about the administration of the higher education loans system,” the letter reads.

“No detailed proposals have been put in place to show how the SLC will deal with a diverse further education system that has no UCAS-style central body to simplify the system.”

Some of the concerns about FE loans have been echoed by the 157 Group in a briefing document titled “Further Education Loans: Issues and Options.”

The briefing document raises issues about the future of Career Development Loans, the progression of adults through access to HE courses and the protection of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects.

It later proposes introducing the FE loans system gradually, “focussing at least initially on those area where the return on investment is highest and most secure.”

Lynne Sedgemore CBE, executive director of the 157 Group, told FE Week: “The FE system is so much more complex than HE in terms of the different kinds of programmes and how they’re delivered in relation to FE loans.

“We’re worried about the scale and the complexity of it, so we do urge a caution around making sure it’s all ready to go.”

EMFEC takes full control of ABC Awards

ABC Awards has become a formal part of the EMFEC group.

Paul Eeles, chief executive of  EMFEC, has taken control of the company and will soon become chief executive of ABC awards.

“ABC Awards is a well-respected Awarding Body which I believe has a sound future in a competitive market,” Mr Eeles said.

“It is our intention to build on the success of Nigel Florence and his team and to cement ABC Awards as a national sector owned and sector responsive awarding organisation.”

Nigel Florence, executive director of ABC Awards, will remain in an advisory capacity until he retires at the end of August.

A review of EMFEC and ABC Awards will be led by John McNamara, former CEO of the Alliance of Sector Skills Councils and Chair of the Federation of Awarding Bodies, to ensure both companies are “truly responsive to their customers and members.”

ABC Awards was setup in 1998 as a joint venture between EMFEC, CENTRA and Learning South West.

CENTRA transferred its interest in the company on March 1, followed by Learning South West on April 2.

Skills Funding Agency publish rules for 2012/13

The Skills Funding Agency have published version one of Funding Rules 2012/13, replacing the various Funding Requirements documents that currently exist.

The forward states there will be an “updated document in May 2012 which will include the supporting audit evidence requirements. For the first time we will consolidate the Funding Rules and associated evidence requirements for all of our funded provision into one document. The document published in May will also give us the opportunity to make adjustments where areas of clarification are needed, particularly those where the sector thinks any specific rules could be made clearer.”

Paragraph 12 is likely to cause colleges some difficulties, as it states that “Where the Agency has made a full contribution to the costs of a Learner’s programme, Providers must not make compulsory charges to employers or Learners for any delivery of the learning activity funded by the Agency. This includes: administration, registration, assessment, materials or examination costs whether incurred directly by the Provider or charged by other organisations such as awarding organisations. This includes charges for identification passes, uniforms, tools and material where without them, a learner cannot complete and achieve their learning aim.”

The Agency will base future years’ funding allocations on the performance of each Provider in getting unemployed people into work.”

New for the 2012/13 are rules concerning minimum durations for apprenticeships aged 19+, which was announced on Sunday.

Providers are likely to want clarification on paragraph 88, which states: “Providers should not claim the full amount of funding available for an Apprenticeship completing in fewer than 12 months and will not ever be able to claim the achievement element of an Apprenticeship not withstanding proven and documented prior learning with a duration of fewer than six months in any circumstances.”

The Agency have also confirmed that they have scrapped plans for an Outcome Incentive Payment and will instead pilot Job Outcome Payments. The document states that “ten per cent of the rate will be paid where an eligible Learner leaves without achieving the learning aim but enters work.” In effect the 10% Job Outcome Payment will opporate as a reduced fine, as it only applies when the provider is not paid the 20% achievement funding. However, paragraph 37 will need some further explanation as it simply states:  “The Agency will base future years’ funding allocations on the performance of each Provider in getting unemployed people into work.”

To download the Funding Rules 2012/13 document click here.

Panorama investigation into apprenticeships sparks sector-wide response

The government and leading membership bodies have responded to “The Great Apprentice Scandal” Panorama programme broadcast on Monday.

David Way, chief executive of the National Apprenticeship Service, said yesterday he was “very concerned” for the apprentices affected on the programme and would be tackling any training providers who are not “up to scratch.”

“I am very concerned for the apprentices who appear to have been seriously misled by poor quality training providers and would like to reassure current and future apprentices and their families that we are committed to making sure their experiences are as good as they can possibly be,” he said.

“We are clear that all Apprenticeships should offer employment, new learning and a nationally recognised qualification and where apprentices have been let down this isn’t good enough.”

Mr Way added: “Where there are problems with training providers or quality isn’t up to scratch we tackle this vigorously.

“The NAS and Skills Funding Agency are aware of all of the cases raised in the programme and we have been working closely with these providers for some time to address and resolve the issues raised and ensure the best outcome for learners.”

The new interim chief executive also defended the apprenticeship scheme run at Morrisons, which was criticised in the Panorama programme for delivering training which would have occurred with or without government funding.

“We will continue to work with employers of all sizes and sectors who, like Morrisons, make a vital commitment to Apprenticeships – they offer employment opportunities and develop the skills of new and existing employees including those who don’t have functional literacy and numeracy skills,” Mr Way said.

“This investment in skills benefits the employer and supports economic growth.”

The Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) has emphasised that lead contractors need to be responsible and accountable not only for the apprenticeships they deliver directly, but also the provision of any sub-contractors which they use.

Graham Hoyle, chief executive of the AELP, said yesterday: “No young person or adult should experience poor provision under the apprenticeship programme and AELP has always fostered a culture of good quality among its member providers.

“This explains why we have always been so keen to work closely with Ofsted and quality improvement services such as LSIS, as well as with the NAS and SFA who are responsible for the flagship skills programme.”

Mr Hoyle added: “None of the sub-contractors featured in the Panorama programme are AELP members, but we believe that while it is a legitimate business practice, sub-contracting is an issue which requires action now.

“The AELP position is that lead contractors, whether they are colleges or independent providers, should not only be fully responsible for the quality of their own directly-delivered apprenticeship provision but they should also be strongly accountable for the provision of their sub-contractors.

“After all, they are sometimes taking significant ‘management fees’ in the process which is public money. We welcome the new SFA pilot which may encourage those that wish it to become directly contracted with the agency so that the lines of accountability are more clearly drawn.”

The Association of Colleges (AoC) say most apprenticeship schemes are of high quality and that any poor or questionable delivery is only “at the fringes.”

Martin Doel, chief executive of the AoC, said yesterday: “The apprenticeship model is fundamentally a good one, as we have seen in the UK and other countries, and AoC agrees with John Hayes MP, Minister for Further Education, Skills and Lifelong Learning, that the focus must continue to be on quality.

“Apprenticeships delivered by our member Colleges are done so with integrity, are of a high standard and are verified by Ofsted.

“Colleges are not-for-profit organisations which serve their communities for the long-term; it is not in their interests to provide poor quality education.”

Mr Doel added: “When there is significant investment and growth in a nationwide training scheme there will inevitably be a few sophisticated operators who try to play the system.

“If there are legitimate questions raised about the quality of any employer or training provider, then they need to be thoroughly investigated by the relevant Government agencies.

“It is imperative that the strong reputation of apprenticeships is maintained; to do that any element of poor quality, however marginal, needs to be eradicated.”

The 157 Group agree that further education colleges are delivering high quality apprenticeships valued by learners and businesses.

Lynne Sedgmore CBE, executive director of the 157 Group said yesterday: “Colleges deliver high quality apprenticeships which provide young people with the skills and experience needed to progress into skilled employment.

“The Government and FE Minister John Hayes is right to champion their cause as they enable learners to both learn and earn at the same time and they should be taken up more widely.”

Marilyn Hawkins, chair of the 157 Group, added: “It is crucial that we do not undermine the true value and worth of apprenticeships and all that they offer to learners.

“In our Apprenticeships case studies launched last May there is a wonderful selection of best practise examples of employer, college and apprentice partnerships and it is this we should be highlighting to encourage greater investment from employers.

The full response from David Way (NAS) can be read here.
The full response from Graham Hoyle (AELP) can be read here.
The full response from Martin Doel (AoC) can be read here.
The full response from the 157 Group can be read here

FE colleges to be directly funded for pre-16s in 2013


Further education (FE) and sixth form colleges could be funded for 14 to 16 year-olds on a similar basis to schools from 2013.

The Department for Education (DfE) is proposing to fund FE colleges using a “simplified local funding formulae” managed by the Education Funding Agency (EFA) from the 2013/14 academic year.

The new proposals are detailed in the ‘School funding reform: Next steps towards a fairer system’ consultation document, published by the DfE on March 26.

“With effect from 2013 and following Professor Alison Wolf’s review of vocational education, FE and Sixth Form Colleges will be able to make full time provision for 14-16 year olds,” the consultation document reads.

“We need to ensure that there is a fair and effective means of funding this.”

It later adds: “FE colleges making provision for 14-16 year olds should be funded so far as possible in the same way as schools in the local area.

“From 2013-14, we think this will mean using the simplified local funding formulae arrangements.”

The DfE plan to use four of the existing 37 formula factors, currently applied to schools through the “simplified local funding formulae”, for FE colleges in 2013:

a) the Age Weighted Pupil Unit (AWPU) for the relevant age group;
b) deprivation;
c) looked after children; and,
d) SEN.

The consultation document states: “The remaining factors relate to premises and the lump sum.

“These are needed for schools as the funding is for the whole institution.

“It would not be appropriate to include these factors for colleges because the funding is for small numbers of pupils at the margin of the institution’s activities.”

However, it is currently unclear how FE and sixth form colleges will apply for an allocation for this type of provision.

The consultation documents says the EFA will be responsible for calculating the funding for each institution, with payments being made “through the normal channels.”

Responses to the consultation document need to be submitted to the DfE by May 21.

(Read the consultation document, ‘School funding reform: Next steps towards a fairer system’  here.)

Top principal salaries detailed for 2010/11

The Skills Funding Agency has published a new version of the College Accounts 2010/11 spreadsheet detailing the salaries of every FE college principal.

The top ten salaries, shown above, contain some inaccuracies however.

Loughborough College has told FE Week the salary for their principal in 2010/11 was in fact £124,000.

A statement from the college reads: “The salary for the Principal of Loughborough College for 2010/11 reported as £242k in FE Week, 3rd April 2012, is incorrect.

“This figure (242k) represents the total salary for 2010/11 for the three senior postholders of the college.”

A spokesperson for Loughborough College told FE Week the reason for the inaccuracy was because of a mistake in their data submission.

The salary published by the SFA for the principal of Barnfield College is also said to be inaccurate.

“Pete Birkett is chief executive and principal of the Barnfield Federation, which is made up of more than Barnfield College alone,” a spokesperson for Barnfield College told FE Week.

“The Federation consists of an existing four academies, three subsidiary companies, the College and five new academies who will be joining the Federation before September.”

The spokesperson added: “The turnover for the Federation is circa £60 million.

“There is a shared contribution towards the salary shown, so the figures quoted should be viewed from a Federal perspective.

“Within the accounts there is a qualifying statement explaining this.”

Barnfield College says the correct salary for Mr Birkett should be £193,000, with an additional £15,000 in benefits.

Dr Lis Smith, principal of Preston College, has contacted FE Week and said the figure used for her salary is also inaccurate.

“The figure that has been quoted, is a figure which has been taken from the accounts which also includes the previous principal’s salary as well,” she said.

“So my salary is £120,000.”

Dr Lis Smith says the amount published by the SFA is in fact a consolidated amount due to an overlap with the previous principal last year.

Warwickshire College and Sussex Downs College have also contacted FE Week and said that their 2010/11 figures are inaccurate because of a handover period with former principals.

Sussex Downs College has clarified that their salary figure should be  “around £160,000.”

Warwickshire College, meanwhile, say their figure should be changed to £170,000.

Derby College has clarified that while the figures published for 2010/11 are correct, the 2009/10  figures have since been restated due to the college’s merger with South East Derbyshire College.

A spokesperson for Derby College told FE Week that the principal’s salary for 2009/10 was actually £185,000, with benefits in kind of £1,000 and pension contributions of £26,000.

The Newcastle College Group (NCG) has confirmed the salary published by the SFA is correct for Jackie Fisher, chief executive of NCG and not Bev Robinson, principal of Newcastle College.

A spokesperson for NCG said: “Her basic salary was £192,000 and the rest is bonus.

“The reason for the reduction of £29,000 was that Jackie Fisher was given a one off retention payment last year relating to the period August 2007 to July 2010.

“This payment was agreed by Governors to provide continuity and stability within NCG during a period of significant growth and development, NCG’s merger with Skelmersdale & Ormskirk College and the acquisition of Intraining.”

West Nottinghamshire College has also confirmed for FE Week the £205,000 figure is correct for 2010/11.

FE Week is continuing to contact colleges for confirmation of the published figures.

The College Accounts 2010/11 spreadsheet can be downloaded from the Skills Funding Agency website here.

The previous spreadsheet, detailing the College Accounts for 2009/10, can be downloaded here.

(Note: The table above has been created using government data and may include anomalies. FE Week will amend any data which is confirmed as inaccurate in the SFA spreadsheet.)

Call for re-evaluation of apprenticeships following Panorama programme

Image: Apprenticeships England founders Lindsay McCurdy (left) and Peter Cobrin (right) read FE Week

The largest independent group of people engaged in apprenticeships has called for a “root and branch re-evaluation” into how apprenticeships are regulated and administered by government.

A statement by Apprenticeships England, a movement with more than 5,000 members which originated on the social networking site LinkedIn, says: “It is far too easy for cowboy operations to flourish under this regime, often with the active connivance or at best the turning of a blind eye by ‘reputable’ institutions including some colleges.

“We call for a root and branch re-evaluation of the way apprenticeships are regulated and administered.”

The statement, issued by group founders Peter Cobrin and Lindsay McCurdy this morning, criticises the government’s management of the apprenticeship programme following the Panorama show “The Great Apprenticeship Scandal”.

“The current apprenticeship programme has been tarnished/damaged by confusion over policy, definition and administration from Government,” the statement reads.

“This was directly responsible for two of the items featured on Panorama last night – the Zenos training programme which only now does John Hayes disown as “not an apprenticeship”, and concerns over “excessive profits” made by some training providers thanks to a payment regime designed, implemented and administered by government and its agencies, the Skills Funding Agency and National Apprenticeship Service.”

The joint response later says the monitoring of training providers is “unfit for purpose” and also erratically administered, leading to a lack of confidence from within the further education sector.

The real question is what will the government do next, if anything.

The Panorama programme, which was broadcast on BBC One last night, interviewed a number of young people which had been let down by poor quality vocational training.

Kyle Emery, who enrolled on a painting and decorating apprenticeship delivered by Forward Thinking Training Solutions, said the scheme had virtually no training and was ultimately a vehicle for cheap labour.

“All it was, was here’s some paint and here’s a brush, crack on and don’t make a mess,” he said.

Other private training providers including Zenos and Elmfield Training were questioned by reporter Shelley Jofre for delivering apprenticeships within a short time frame or with large profit margins.

Mr Cobrin told FE Week however he believes the Panorama programme will have “little impact” because it focuses too heavily on historical case studies.

“There wasn’t any shock or scandal,” Mr Cobrin said.

“Everything they revealed, we knew about. The colleges turning a blind eye, the training providers milking the system, it was nothing new.”

He added: “The real question is what will the government do next, if anything.”

The Panorama programme featured the relationship between Morrisons supermarket, which has enrolled 40 per cent of its workforce on an apprenticeship, with the private training provider Elmfield Training.

The show highlighted how Gerard Syddall, company director and 95 per cent shareholder of Elmfield Training, used pre-tax profits of more than £12 million in the financial year ending September 2010 to pay himself dividends of almost £3 million.

Neil Lakeland, marketing manager at Hadlow College, tweeted: “Can’t believe the CEO of Elmfield Training got a £3m bonus for a Grade 3 satisfactory. Who needs bankers! #bbcpanorama”

Mr Syddall is said to be one of the speakers at the “Making Apprenticeships Work Even Better” conference, organised by Apprenticeships England and to be chaired by Nick Linford, managing editor of FE Week, in Leeds on July 7.

It follows a successful first conference, entitled “Making Apprenticeships Work”, held by the group in March.