Robert Halfon, MP for Harlow

“I always think the best test of a person is not when they’re winning; it’s how they recover from defeat and adversity,” says Rob Halfon. And he would know. It took him three attempts to win his seat in parliament. On his second go, he lost by just 87 votes.

But the Harlow MP, best known for pioneering apprenticeships in Westminster, has faced struggles in his own life, which may go some way to explaining his persistence and determination. Halfon was born with Spastic Diplegia, a form of Cerebal Palsy, which affects the lower extremities – usually the legs, hips and pelvis.

Halfon says he has a moderate version of the disease (he was a late walker and underwent several major operations as a child) and things were “relatively good” until his early thirties when he started to suffer with osteoarthritis, as a result of all the surgery he’d had as a child.

He jokes stoically that his worsening health problems were the “curse” of becoming a Tory candidate. But he refuses to feel sorry for himself and is keen to point out that he has “no hang ups”. In fact, he says, he has been very lucky in life.

By his own admission, he had a privileged upbringing in a Jewish family with traditional values and went to Highgate, an independent school in north London. His father had a fruit and vegetable wholesalers in East London. “It was work hard, save hard and do the right thing…that kind of mentality,” he recalls.

His father, and his grandfather before him also knew about struggle, he says. They fled Libya in the early days of the Gadaffi regime, after the family house and business were seized by the dictatorship. His father came to the UK with nothing, made money, and lost it all again in the recession of the 1990s.

Halfon says he was “terrible” at school, always wanting to do his own thing, (lying on his bed reading and listening to the radio, mainly). Academically, he didn’t start to shine until sixth form when he only had to study things that interested him, he says. By that point, he was already active in the Conservative party, “canvassing…knocking on doors and stuffing envelopes – the whole thing.” He also had his heart set on becoming a Tory MP and his inspiration was Margaret Thatcher.

“I loved Mrs Thatcher from the beginning,” he says, practically drooling. “I remember seeing a cartoon about her in the Express and think ‘God she was strong.’ I love strong women, always have done. Queen Elizabeth was always my favourite queen, my favourite monarch in history.” So while other teenage boys’ bedroom walls were plastered with Blondie, Linda Lusardi and Sam Fox, Halfon had the Iron Lady’s signature on his. “My dad took me to a St. John’s Ambulance event when I was about 16 and I shook her hand and she signed the invitation which I framed,” he explains, still clearly chuffed about it. “In fact, I have it framed in my loo.”

Halfon went on to Exeter University to study politics, where he became chairman of Exeter University conservatives and the Western Area Conservative Students. He also famously took the National Union of Students (NUS) to the European Court of Human Rights – and won – on the issue of compulsory membership.

After a stint selling hotel memberships at a posh London hotel, he got a job as a part-time researcher with Harold Elletson (who subsequently defected to the Liberal party) and over the following decade worked for various Tory MPs including Michael Fabricant, MP for Lichfield. But after losing the Harlow seat a second time in 2005, he decided it was all or nothing.

“It’s not like any job when you’ve got another interview next week,” he says. “You’ve got to wait another four years and campaign more. The count went on for three days, and when you have wanted something from the age of 10 and you’re that close…it was terrible but you can either make a decision of crying and sitting in a darkened room and thinking ‘I’m never going to fight again’ or dust yourself down and try again.”

And that is exactly what he did. He quit his job (by then he was Oliver Letwin’s chief of staff) to work as a freelance consultant, so he could devote more time to his campaign. Halfon says he chose Harlow, where he now lives with his girlfriend (unlike many MPs, he doesn’t have a second home, he is keen to point out) because of its “incredible community spirit.” He also wanted to work in a place where there were social issues, because despite all the “nasty party stuff” the Conservatives are interested in helping the vulnerable or disadvantaged in society, he says.

I think it’s criminal when people leave school unable to read. Whoever’s responsible for that should be shot really”

In fact, it was this kind of work that first got him interested in apprenticeships. “I was visiting a charity called Catch 22 and I met these kids who’d had various problems with the law…and they all started talking about apprenticeships. They starting saying that there were no opportunities for them and if they looked at the National Apprenticeship Service website they might be lucky if there was one apprenticeship advertised in Leeds or something. The God’s honest truth is that I was moved.”

And he wasn’t alone, he says. At a hustings debate at Harlow College, in the run up for his third attempt to win the Harlow seat, he recalls seeing “everyone just wake up” when he started to talk about apprenticeships. “It was incredible, the feeling from the room. And when I talked to parents that was what they wanted…I decided to make it a central plank of my manifesto.”

Since then he has gone on to recruit the first apprentice in parliament, help launch a National Apprentice Card (in conjunction with his old nemesis, the NUS) and a professional society for apprentices is in the early stages of development.

Halfon has also been instrumental in setting up a new parliamentary apprentice programme with the charity New Deal of The Mind Known as the “school of apprentices”, it will offer 16- to 19-year-olds the chance to spend up to three days a week working in Westminster, along with two days working towards a level 3 apprenticeship (equivalent to A-level) in business administration.

It’s early days for the cross-party scheme, but around 12 of the 650 MPS have signed up so far and more are thought to follow. His second apprentice, Louis Luck, has just been appointed
But in an age of Blackberries (Halfon is certainly addicted to his) and Twitter, being an MP is more 24/7 than it ever it was and he admits it can be hard to find time to relax. He still reads a lot, mostly news, but also gadget and techie magazines. He also collects watches and has almost 200 displayed all over his house.

Watching “rubbish” on the telly (he is a fan of soaps and of course Essex-based reality TV show The Only Way is Essex) is another popular pastime, which acts “like a vacuum cleaner of the mind” for him. But, he admits, it can be tough to switch off and he is often up at ridiculous hours of the night, tweeting or writing his blog. While he finds it easy enough to drop off, he is often awake, a few hours later, his mind racing.

Like many Westminster folk, caffeine and adrenaline gets him through the long days in parliament.

As well as his apprenticeships work, Halfon is also an active campaigner on tax cuts (particularly on petrol) and says he believes in “tax cuts for the many, not for the few.” But education and training is what really seems to drive him; he is a big fan of university technical college and would like his next campaign to focus on basic literacy. He explains with his typical candour. “If you look at the statistics of young delinquents and criminals and so on…most of them have dyslexia or reading problems. I think it’s criminal when people leave school unable to read. Whoever’s responsible for that should be shot really.”

A closer look at non-traditional delivery models

In the last few weeks, the National Apprenticeship Service (NAS) revealed to FE Week that a review was underway into short apprenticeships. Delivery models, the NAS said, which do not come up to scratch with specific guidance in the Specification of Apprenticeship Standards for England (SASE) may need to change or face the loss of funding. However, the body also said the review will judge some cases as “appropriate”, despite not meeting the SASE.

FE Week takes a closer look at two different delivery apprenticeship models being advertised at present.

SQi training provider pays the wage for 15 week apprenticeship

A training provider is offering free work placements to businesses including the cost of the wage for an apprentice.

SQi Watford Ltd (SQi) has revealed to FE Week it advertises free placements and pays the wage as an incentive to businesses to take on apprentices.

But West Herts College and its subcontractor Best Practice Training and Development (BPT) say the arrangement is “compliant” with Skills Funding Agency (SFA) guidelines.
BPT is subcontracted by West Herts College to provide training to apprentices. They then pay SQi but insist it is not from their SFA pot.

In August, the NAS, reiterating a document from the SFA, said providers should not use money from the SFA to pay apprentices.

In Paragraph 66 of the SFA’s Apprenticeship Funding Requirements 2011/12 document, it reads: “Apprenticeship funding cannot be used to pay Apprenticeship wages, as its primary function is to fund learning. Therefore, where the Provider is the employer, or an associate organisation is the employer, the Provider must be able to positively demonstrate that Agency funds are not being used in this way.”

SQi offers Level 2 Business and Administration apprenticeships over a 15-week course for 16 to 18-year-olds. It includes a 10-week work placement, with apprentices placed into local businesses “free-of charge” by SQi, who pay £2.60 per hour apprenticeship minimum wage for a 30-hour week.

Mikki Davis, apprenticeship manager at SQi, said: “SQi pay the wages. People find it very difficult to get work placements.

“It’s tight and businesses don’t have money to pay apprentices. We couldn’t find placements when they (businesses) had to pay. We are trying to bring that (businesses paying the wage) into effect.”

Duncan Murray, the director of skills and enterprise at the college, said BPT is “registered separately at Company House” to SQi. A check by FE Week found they share the same two directors and registered address.

Mr Murrary added: “West Herts College is aware SQi pay the wages of apprentices registered with us, and this is completely compliant with SFA guidelines. Our compliance team is perfectly happy with the arrangement as is the NAS and their Best Practice team.”

David Allenstein, director at BPT, said SQi are funded by a different arm of BPT, which does not involve SFA funding.

He said: “SQi does not draw funding from the Skills Funding Agency for the payment of apprenticeship wages. This area is funded by the commercial training arm of Best Practice Training.”

The NAS are investigating the case.

Bloom offer Estate Agents 26 week Level 3 apprenticeships

Changes will be made to a delivery model to ensure it is an “accurate reflection” of its outcome.

Training provider Bloom offers Level 3 apprenticeships in Sale of Residential Property and Letting and Property Management, which appear to take place in half of the time of the suggested framework.

As set out by Asset Skills, the Sector Skills Council, in their Property Services apprenticeship framework document, it is “envisaged that the apprenticeship will take 12 months” to complete.

However, the courses delivered by Bloom are said to take place over “26 weeks” which includes “a mixture of classroom based activity and work placements” with two sales and two lettings models run each year.

A schedule on the firm’s website shows a typical plan, which details the mix of work at the Bloom Training Centre and on work placements.

Following an induction week and week two on IT training, the apprentice is put on the placement for week three and four. The programme continues in the centre completing three NFOPP units, interspersed with time on placements.

In total, the apprentice will spend 16 weeks on placement and the remaining 10 weeks working to qualifications. A final 27th week is for graduation.

However, Steven Proudfoot, Chief Operating Officer at Asset Skills, said: “It’s an ambitious timeframe. Our concern is to ensure everything is done correctly and the right learning hours are allowed and it’s being delivered effectively.

“We have been working with Bloom and delivered 10 to 12 certificates for Bloom, which have taken nine months to complete.

“We are working with them to make sure their website is updated to show it is a more accurate reflection to the actual model.”

He added: “We always want to work with the providers and the sector to make sure the model is the best for the candidate.”

Di McEvoy-Robinson, director at Bloom, said they set the 26 week model after talks with the employers in the sector.

However, they are now working to rework the model.

She said: “However, the reality for the first 14 to 15 candidates is that it’s taken nine to 10 months. If some take 15 months, then that’s fine too. It’s about meeting the candidates individual needs.”

Concerns over funding for FE teacher training

Questions have been raised over the further education (FE) sector’s ability to attract experts into teaching in the face of proposed government reforms.

The Institute for Learning (IfL) has expressed concerns about proposed teacher training reforms and the implications of funding changes for initial teacher training (ITT).

In responses to two government consultations – Attracting, training and retaining the best teachers and New challenges, new chances: next steps in implementing the further education reform programme – the IfL highlighted several policy areas for closer examination and review.

It was concerned about the sector’s ability to attract experts from industry into the teaching workforce, when ITT tuition fees rise significantly from 2012, and the lack of parity between teacher training opportunities in the education sector.

IfL’s chief executive, Toni Fazaeli, said: “Our data shows that the average age of new teachers and trainers coming into our sector is around 37, by which time individuals are likely to have a family, mortgage, and other financial commitments, including perhaps existing student loans.

“The prospect of taking on additional debt of at least £6,000 for ITT qualifications could deter them from moving into teaching as a second profession, where their pay is likely to be lower.

“We owe our international competitiveness, the influence of our innovation and the strength of our communities to the skills of our teachers and trainers, and we should be welcoming the most talented individuals into our sector with open arms.

“It cannot be right that while teacher training in schools attracts generous bursaries of up to £20,000 for priority subjects, there is no such support for those wishing to teach or train in FE and skills, even if their professional expertise lies in science, technology, engineering or mathematics.”

The IfL also believes the Troops to Teachers programme should be funded in FE, while the facility for young people aged over 14 to benefit from being taught by vocationally trained experts should be “at the heart” of the education system.

Mrs Fazaeli added: “The dramatic change in the accessibility of post-compulsory teacher training is unprecedented and poses significant risks to the sustainability of our high-quality teaching workforce.

“The education select committee should recommend an urgent review of the likely implications and potential remedies to mitigate the impact of tuition fee increases, such as writing off student debt for trainee teachers, providing tax relief or offering generous bursaries on a par with those for school teacher trainees.”

IfL’s concerns are shared by the Universities Council for the Education of Teachers (UCET), whose executive director, James Noble-Rogers, said: “The new fees regime could undo progress towards professionalisation and parity of esteem with schools, have an adverse impact on widening participation and damage the quality of students’ education.

“The problem could  easily be solved through bursaries or a continuation of direct funding for training courses.”

Learning and Skills Network in administration

A charity with more than 25 years experience in the education sector has been placed into administration.

Ian Oakley-Smith, David Hurst and Karen Dukes of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) were appointed joint administrators of Learning and Skills Network (LSN) on Thursday.

The charity, with a turnover of around £13 million for 2010/11,  employs 117 staff and is based in London (48 employees), with offices also in Oxford (14 employees), Olney (16 employees), Cambridge (26 employees) and Belfast (13 employees).

It is not known at this time whether those jobs are secure.

It operates five separate businesses: Technology for Learning, National Extension College, Education, Skills and Research, Development Services, Learning and Skills Development Agency (Northern Ireland)/Learning and Skills Network.

David Hurst, joint administrator and director at PwC, said: “The charity operates a number of businesses and has suffered a dramatic decline in contract income since 2009 with its funded programmes diminished due primarily to the cuts in government spending.

“As a result of the decline in income and significant pension liabilities within the charity, the trustees concluded that they were unable to continue and have placed the charity into administration.”

He also said that buyers are now being sought.

“Our immediate priority is to seek buyers for the successful businesses within the charity, to enable their long term survival, preserve jobs and continue supporting customers and students. 

“We would encourage any interested parties to contact us as a matter of urgency,” he said.

Ian Oakley-Smith, joint administrator, director and head of charity advisory at PwC, said: “There has been a marked increase in the number of financially distressed charities approaching us for advice and assistance in recent weeks and months as the Spending Review begins to impact those charities reliant on government support.

“Learning and Skills Network has over 25 years experience of high quality delivery in the education sector.

“It is an organisation which has excellent relationships across all levels within the sector, previously working to deliver large scale projects and innovative solutions for clients including the UK Government and its agencies, FE institutions and large private sector clients.”

He added: “It appears that there is a good deal of interest in a number of Learning and Skills Network’s activities and we are hopeful that they will be able to continue under different ownership.”

FE Week has approached LSN for comment, but no one was available at the time of publication.

How would you survive without ‘Mickey Mouse’?

 What harm has Mickey Mouse ever done to anyone? No, I can’t think of anything either ... so how has poor Mickey’s name become associated with the worthless and the risible? Back in the summer the Sunday Express gave us this:

“…a stark warning from the British Chamber of Commerce: do not go to university unless you plan to study something useful. Policy director Dr Adam Marshall said: ‘There may be a course in underwater basket weaving but that does not mean anybody will actually want to employ you at the end of it.’ Universities should be banned from running Mickey Mouse courses that are best left to further education colleges.”

Poor Dr Marshall was on the receiving end of quite a lot of stick for this, but he was set up. It was that last sentence that seemed so gratuitous.

Of course, poor Mickey’s crumbling reputation is all the fault of Margaret Hodge (BSc Third Class). In 2003 she opined that a Mickey Mouse course: ‘is one where the content is perhaps not as rigorous as one would expect and where the degree itself may not have huge relevance in the labour market’.

Here comes Alan Johnson (11+) in the Guardian:

“We must rebalance taxpayers’ money towards the subjects where there is greatest need – so more plumbing, less Pilates; subsidised precision engineering, not over-subsidised flower arranging…”

Johnson went on to suggest that …

“Teachers and politicians should stop talking about ‘vocational’ courses and use the word ‘professional’ instead, as part of a drive to recruit young people with skills needed by industry and ‘end our endemic prejudice against vocational qualifications as inferior to academic achievement’.”

“The former postman said: ‘I would be quite happy to lose the word ‘vocational’ completely from our school dictionaries if it was proved to deter people from taking these vital courses.’”

He has a point, though the Guardian reporter (now Head of Communications for the Russell Group) just had to use that ‘former postman‘ prefix.

Indeed, scratch the surface and the class-based sneering is almost always there, even among Mickey’s friends. Here is Boris Johnson (BA Literae Humaniores) coming out in defence of poor Mickey:

“Kids these days! says our man with the pint of Stella, slapping the Daily Telegraph on the bar. Look at the rubbish they study!
… Why, he asks rhetorically, are we paying for students to waste their time on these Mickey Mouse courses, when it is perfectly obvious what they should be doing. Trades! Skills! Craft! … they would have been far better off getting stuck into a job after leaving school and engaging in an old-fashioned apprenticeship.”

Strip the tech out of a town and we’d all go shaggy and starve and have to walk everywhere.”

Yet we all interact daily with people who are the products of FE – the hairdressers, car mechanics, restaurant staff, receptionists … so how does FE achieve such apparent invisibility?

It’s partly that their achievements are badged by the exam boards. That framed certificate is branded by Edexcel, not by FE. But ask any cabby for the local college and they will say, ‘You mean the Tech?’ and take you there while telling you all about the courses they and their kids have attended.

Strip the tech out of a town and how would you ever get anything fixed, cut or cooked? We’d all go shaggy and starve and have to walk everywhere. Next time you get your hair cut or your car repaired, ask them where they trained. I guarantee the ‘tech word will crop up.

Wasn‘t it Kenneth Baker who invited the ‘Cinderella sector’ to come onto the dance floor? He is now busy with his university technical colleges, which have the revolutionary idea of training 14–19 year olds in practical vocational skills. My old dad knew about those in the 1930s – I still have the agreement signed by him, his employer and Leicester Tech in 1933 for his apprenticeship, recently rediscovered with delight by Asda

Let’s allow Boris the last word:

“It is ridiculous for these saloon-bar critics to denounce ‘Mickey Mouse’ degrees, and say that the students would be better off doing vocational courses – when the whole point is that these degrees are very largely vocational.
It’s just a pity that he didn’t pause to consider who is fixing his bike or styling his hair.”

 

By Nick Warren

Inspections for sale. Whose bright idea was that!?

Time is running out to respond to Ofsted’s consultation on its new Common Inspection Framework proposals.

The deadline is November 24 so if you’re thinking about adding your two-penneth, you need to get your skates on.

This is a rare opportunity to pass judgment on Ofsted (doesn’t normally happen that way around).

After reading the document, Agitator felt the need to share one of the more ‘radical’ proposals.

The consultation proposes that ‘Ofsted will welcome requests for inspection and it will be for HMCI to decide whether and when to inspect the provider.

The Education Bill provides Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) with additional powers to agree to requests for schools and providers to be inspected and to charge a fee for such an inspection.’

So, it’s Ofsted’s idea that colleges should have the ability to buy a quickie re inspection.

Now, call me a bluff old traditionalist but doesn’t this have the words ‘unintended consequences’ written all over it? I mean, Ofsted is not X Factor… should you really be able to ‘come back’ the following year, if you don’t quite live up to expectations, and pay to have another go?

Clearly the price tag once decided would be of considerable interest, and discussions I’ve heard in the sector have mooted figures of between £35K and £50K for a re inspection.

You might wonder why college’s would spend their increasingly squeezed budgets on more Ofsted inspections.
Here’s a few reasons why:

College A is less than happy with its new Ofsted grade. It may have been an outstanding college that has narrowly missed its previously earned ‘beacon’ status.

College A is going to be under tremendous pressure to part with £50K of its learners’ dosh to buy back its reputation.

College B is a good provider that has improved significantly since its previous inspection, it may feel that there is compelling evidence (£50K’s worth) that it might be judged outstanding were it to be re inspected.

College C was previously judged outstanding and is exempted from routine inspection it’s feeling pretty confident and would like to renew its ‘outstanding’ badge and is happy to pay tens of thousands of pounds to do so.

College D is a really failing college, and is asking if there’s a ‘buy two get one free’ offer!

Joking aside, this new departure doesn’t sit right. College relationships with Ofsted are bound to change as they become a source of income.

Will colleges be demanding a different service if they are paying for it? Will Ofsted get any future business if re-inspections do not result in higher grades?

As Ofsted becomes commericalised there may even be competition, like the train and utility companies.

I guess the big and concise question that I’m actually asking is, How will Ofsted be able to maintain its independence if its for hire?
Will Ofsted be tempted to downgrade colleges to upsell a re inspection? How would we know?

And… will Ofsted have institution or monetary targets to meet, to measure the effectiveness of this new…venture?

Agitator lays the unanswered questions bare, inspect them carefully and let me know what you think….at no charge.

FE Week mini-mascot (Edition 8)

Follow the adventures of FE Week’s biggest and smallest fan!

Mostly this week I have been facing forward in my new car seat!”

And also you can follow our FE Week mini-mascot on Twitter @daniellinford

Colleges to keep left-over funding

Clawback will be waived for providers who have delivered 97 per cent or more of their targets, the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) has revealed. The SFA, in Issue 81 of their updates weekly bulletin, say they have agreed principles for managing 2010/11 funding outturn for all grant-funded providers.

This is subject to the final data return for 2010/11, which is due this month. The proposed approach, the Agency say, is intended to ensure that past and current performance is reflected in future funding allocations. It reads: “A tolerance of three per cent will be applied to the final outturn for 2010/11, so clawback will be waived for providers who have delivered 97 per cent or more. Therefore, most providers will not be subject to clawback for 2010/11.”

A number of factors will be taken into account for those below the tolerance, states the SFA, such as performance in previous years and accuracy of mid-year estimates for 2010/11 in deciding whether clawback will be applied.

SFA adds: “Where a provider has delivered more than 100 per cent of the allocation for 2010/11, the assumption will be this year that the Agency will fund over-performance, subject to a normal maximum of 10 per cent of the total allocation or £1m, whichever is lower.”

The update also states “In cases where there has been significant under-performance and where this was not declared in mid-year estimates, the Agency may rebase a provider’s allocation for 2011/12.  This may be in addition to, or instead of, clawback.”

This month, the SFA’s relationship teams will speak to providers who may be subject to clawback or rebasing to “understand the circumstances” behind it. Decisions will be communicated to providers next month. The SFA also revealed it is in a position to allocate additional funding in 2011/12.

The update adds: “This will be used to increase training opportunities targeted at low skilled young people aged 19-24 who are NEET. “Providers who have delivered on target or above in 2010/11 and/or believe they could deliver more provision for this group in 2011/12 are invited to speak to their Agency Relationship Team before November 18.”

Funding Allocations for the next academic year, due to be released next month, will be calculated on the actual performance in 2010/11. The final funding allocation for 2012/13 is due to be issued in March 2012 and it will be updated to reflect mid-year estimates for 2011/12. The update adds: “This means that it may be higher or lower than the initial allocation. The Agency will review mid-year estimates to ensure they are reasonable and realistic, including looking at the accuracy of estimates for previous years. This will ensure that allocations for 2012/13 reflect current performance in 2011/12, as well as past performance in 2010/11.”

Train to Gain volumes prove ‘lesson in government-speak’

The number of learners starting workplace learning continues to thrive despite the government’s focus on increasing apprenticeships.

The number of new starts in Train to Gain/ Workplace learning fell to 444,700 in 2010/11, a figure still higher than the record number of new apprentices, a total of 442,700, praised by the government last week (see page 8).

The figures, found in the latest Statistical First Release (SFR), also mean that there has been little growth in the overall number of people starting work-based training.
Professor Alison Wolf, an advisor to Government on 14-19 vocational learning, said: “If you search for ‘Train to Gain’ on line, you’ll be told that the government abolished it last year in order to free resources for more valuable activities. So these figures are an interesting lesson in government-speak. Given what is also happening with apprenticeships, you have to wonder whether ministers are taking rising youth unemployment an iota as seriously as they should be.”

Overall numbers of Train to Gain/Workplace learning starts did fall, but some areas saw increases. Qualifications in the Leisure, Travel and Tourism Sector Subject Area rose dramatically by 34 per cent in 2010/11.

The SFR supplementary tables also showed an increase of eight per cent in Train to Gain/ Workplace learning starts in Tottenham and Slough, and there was a similar increase of seven per cent in Hastings and Rye during 2010/11.

They assume all apprenticeships are all about making the first step into training and work. Apprenticeships also serve a vitally important function in providing an opportunity for people to add to their skills who are already at work.”

The findings add to fears that some of the new apprentices being praised by government could in fact be existing employees which would have previously been funded under Train to Gain. New apprentices aged 25 and above increased by 126,500 in 2010/11, while new learners starting a Train to Gain/Workplace Learning qualification went down by 130,200.

John Hayes, Minister of State for Further Education, Skills and Lifelong Learning, told FE Week that he was not concerned with the rise in apprentices aged 25 and above. Mr Hayes said: “You’re right. There was growth in 25+, partly of course because we’ve made apprenticeships our principle vehicle for reskilling and up skilling the workforce.

“It’s true that we need to calibrate the system to ensure there’s growth across the piste, and we are looking at that. I wouldn’t want growth to be exclusively in one area, and it isn’t currently, but if there were any risk of that I would take action to ensure there was consistent and sustainable growth. There’s a misunderstanding I think on the part of people who don’t quite get apprenticeships. They assume all apprenticeships are all about making the first step into training and work. Apprenticeships also serve a vitally important function in providing an opportunity for people to add to their skills who are already at work.”

Train to Gain came under heavy criticism from Mr Hayes when he was Shadow Minister. In November 2009 he said: “The service has a massive dead weight cost. Money for Train to Gain will be transferred into a new budget. The scheme accredits existing skills that are on offer and assesses rather than trains. It doesn’t focus on higher-level skills.”