Latest news from FE Week | FE Week

New inspection framework

Ofsted have released the new Common Inspection Framework as part of the Handbook for the inspection for further education and skills.

Changes to the framework, which will be implemented from September, include the reduction of inspection notice periods from three weeks to two days and the replacement of the ‘satisfactory’ judgement with ‘requires improvement’.

There will normally be a full inspection of providers judged to ‘require improvement’ within 12 to 18 months and providers judged to ‘require improvement’ twice in a row may be judged inadequate on their third inspection if they have failed to improve.

Matthew Coffey, national director for learning and skills, said: “Ofsted received hundreds of valuable responses to the Good education for all consultation enabling us to listen and act on any concerns raised. Often learners were more positive about the proposals than many of the providers. In shaping the arrangements for inspection Ofsted has given particular weight to learners as the primary users of the services within the sector.”

Concern over VAT on FE loans

Learners taking out an FE loan next year could be forced to pay 20 per cent VAT if they study with an independent training provider, according to Graham Hoyle, Chief Executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) .

The charge will be introduced as part of the “24+ advanced learning loan” scheme next year, but will not affect learners studying at a general FE college.

Mr Hoyle, said the new VAT payment was “worrying” and “entirely unacceptable”.

Speaking on the first day of the AELP National Conference 2012, he said: “That really will be a nonsense if there is a VAT differential between the type of provider.”

Mr Hoyle said he was told about the 20 per cent VAT payment by a colleague that attended a meeting with a Treasury official, but did not tell AELP members because he “didn’t want to upset them”.

John Hayes MP, minister of state for further education, skills and lifelong learning, didn’t comment on the issue publicly.

“Well Graham you know me well enough to know that I am far too professional a politician to ever speak, answer or comment outside of my box,” he said

“But I hear what you said and I have no doubt you will be making a recommendation to me and I will be making one as well to George Osborne in the treasury.”

Martin Doel, chief executive of the Association of Colleges (AoC), was also presenting at the conference, and used the morning session to outline other key differences between independent training providers and colleges.

Mr Doel said colleges, universities and schools operated on different ‘playing fields’ to private providers.

He argued that general FE colleges are different in particular because they are not-for-profit and serve their local community.

“I am quite aware that some colleges serve beyond the place they’re located in,” he said.

“But I would submit to you that the defining characteristic of a college is that it belongs to the place, in a way that is very different from a university, which of course serves a region or national agenda.

“Colleges serve and belong to the place where they are, and how they affect upon that community.”

Mr Doel said that if independent training providers wanted to operate on the same ‘playing field’ as colleges they would need to accept accountability to their local community.

“With freedom comes responsibility,” he said. With responsibility comes accountability, and that accountability must be to their community or the stakeholder in the communities.”

The AoC chief executive acknowledged that while a number of AELP members are either charities or not-for-profit, colleges are always looking to reinvest surplus funds.

“They’ll do things that are not easy to achieve – success in the various metrics that are being applied by Ofsted or by government – because they are the right things to do, the necessary things to do to serve that community,” he said.

CBI report reveals basic skills deficit

Employers remain dissatisfied with school and college leavers’ basic skills according to a report by CBI.

Around a third of employers said that young people lacked the necessary skills for work – the same amount as a decade ago.

CBI, a business lobbying organisation, found that 42 per cent of businesses had to provide remedial training for school and college leavers.

At the launch of the report, Keith Attwood, chair of CBI’s education and skills committee and chief executive of e2v technologies, said: “The education and training of our current workforce and future recruits to our workforce is central to economic recovery. It’s their skills and their creativity that will be at the heart of the recovery process.

“Long term economic success is inexplicably linked to a nation’s standard of education and skills.”

This was supported by Rod Bristow, the president of Pearson, which sponsored the survey. He said: “Nothing is more important for the future of economic success in our country and the lives of young people than education.”
The president said that higher expectations needed to be set for literacy and numeracy, but employers were also finding insufficient life skills. Young people lacked initiative and the problem solving capabilities needed to thrive in employment.

“Even the best performing nations say that the number one issue is to better equip school leavers with the broader skills needed for working life,” he said.

The number one issue is to better equip school leavers with the broader skills needed for working life”

The education and skills survey found that of the 542 firms questioned 61 per cent said school and college leavers had not developed the self-management skills needed for work.

Mr Bristow spoke about the importance of businesses engaging with schools and colleges. Over the past year, one third of businesses increased their engagement, but the president said this was “still no way near enough”.

The report said the survey “paints an encouraging picture”, with 81 per cent of employers planning to increase or maintain levels of investment in training. The number of firms that said they were going to reduce investment, however, increased from 2011 from 8 to 19 per cent.

Shadow Education Secretary Stephen Twigg highlighted the importance of careers guidance.

“Employers see the quality of careers advice for young people as not good enough by a remarkable balance of minus 68 per cent,” he said.

“That is neither a surprising finding to me nor one that we can afford ignore.”

“I am very worried that when government policy is moving away from an emphasis on face-to-face careers guidance that already very stark and negative figure might only get worse.”

AELP Conference 2012 Special Edition

FE Week brings you a 16 special edition, with content from the first the first day at the Association of Employment and Learning Providers’ (AELP), as well as exclusive FE Week expert articles.

Click here to download the hi-resolution version (19mb)

Click here to download the low-resolution version (5mb)

Richard Review interview

Entrepreneur Doug Richard is to lead an independent review into the future of the apprenticeship programme in England.

The former Dragon’s Den investor has been commissioned by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) and Department for Education (DfE) to look at how the government can build on the record number of new apprentices.

Mr Richard, speaking exclusively to FE Week, said he had been chosen to lead the review because of his extensive history working with small businesses.

“I’ve been asked really to take a forward look at the role of apprenticeships in society,” he said.

“As you can imagine it’s all changing terribly quickly, so I think the value that I bring is just my point of view.

“ I’m to the benefit of – and from the perspective of – small businesses, that’s where my life’s work is and I think that that happened to be something that is important to (the government) at this point in time.”

The ‘Richard Review of Apprenticeships’ will look at what the core components of an apprenticeship should be in the future, considering the needs of the ever-changing economy.

It will also consider how best to ensure every apprenticeship delivers a high amount of quality training, looking at the qualifications and skills which they provide employers
“I think there is a zeal for apprenticeships,” Mr Richard told FE Week.

“Any area where the government is either growing the economy and growing jobs or creating ladders for success, I think they look at and say what more can we do?”

Mr Richard said he is “very open to consultation” and is already drawing up a list of the key stakeholders he wants to hear from.

“I’m putting together a small brain trust of people who I think can bring some innovative thinking, and I’m going to be looking to them to work with me for framing what the potential for an apprenticeship could be,” he told FE Week.

Mr Richard said he hopes to publish the report in October.

Business secretary Vince Cable said: “To build a prosperous economy we need a skilled workforce.

“The apprenticeship programme has been a real success, not only boosting chances for young people, but also helping businesses to address their skills gaps.

“However in the past vocational youngsters have been let down by weak courses and our competitors have stolen a march.

“To keep pace it is vital that we build on our initial success and continue to look at how apprenticeships can adapt to meet our future needs in the fast-evolving global economy.”

Mr Richard is the founder of School for Startups, a social enterprise teaching new entrepreneurs how to start and run a successful businesses.

He also produced the ‘Richard Report’ in 2008, a document which investigated the British government’s support of small businesses.

Michael Gove, secretary of state for education, says Mr Richard is a “proper entrepreneur” and will help “get apprenticeships right”.

“It’s great that the numbers taking up apprenticeships has grown, but there are still serious issues,” he said.

“There is still too much bureaucracy getting in the way of small firms taking people on, too much money appears to be going to middle men and the quality of some vocational qualifications taken by apprentices is still not good enough.