Peter Marples, director and owner, Aspire Achieve Advance

In early 2006 Peter Marples, fresh off the back of a merger between his provider Assa and training giant Carter & Carter, was vaunted in national press as “one of the least known and more powerful people in further education”.

When I tell him this, he laughs and describes it as “an inappropriate comment by an exuberant journalist”.

“It’s certainly not true now,” he says.

The claim may not be true, but current venture Aspire Achieve Advance certainly has some clout.

As of last month, it held subcontractor contracts worth £5.8m, according to the Skills Funding Agency, and works with around 1,500 apprentices.

However, one of Marples’s biggest regrets is the Assa deal (which he pitches more as a sale than a merger) despite the fact it resulted in his appointment to the role of business development director at Carter & Carter.

He had been managing director of Assa when the deal was struck in August 2005. The £24.2m Carter & Carter paid for Assa made Marples — who had led a management buyout of the transport, aerospace and food and drink industries provider just two years earlier — a multi-millionaire almost overnight.

But, he says: “I think the timing was not right to sell Assa at that point.

“I think the business could have gone on independently to probably have been now the biggest and best provider in the sector.”

He chose to go ahead with the deal partly, he says, because of a “genuine belief that being part of something bigger would have helped us grow faster”.

But Carter & Carter’s subsequent demise meant his dreams for Assa were not to be.

Inset: Peter Marples with wife Sarah at a Radio 2 driving experience in aid of Children in Need
Inset: Peter Marples with wife Sarah at a Radio 2 driving experience in aid of Children in Need

Carter & Carter had begun life in 1992 with a contract to improve the accident and repair division at the Vauxhall car firm. Five years later it moved into training, winning the British Audi Academy contract.

In 2005 Carter & Carter was floated on the stock market with an £80m valuation before Assa was acquired and by April 2007, Carter & Carter shares were trading hands for more than £12 each, valuing it at £550m-plus.

But the growth strategy came to an abrupt end with the tragic death of founder Phillip Carter, who died along with his 17-year-old son, Andrew, in a helicopter crash in May 2007.

Within eight months the 27,000-learner company was in administration with shares tumbling to 85p before they were suspended.

It was eventually bought out in the main by NCG (formerly Newcastle College Group). The deal was thought to have helped save the jobs of around 1,500 of Carter & Carter’s 2,200 staff.

“It was very difficult personally because I should have been with Phil in that helicopter — the company lost its charismatic leader,” says Marples, who resigned following the tragedy.

He adds: “I had an allegiance to Phil and respected his vision and drive and I didn’t trust the vision and drive of those who replaced him.”

Despite this, he tells me he was “of course” surprised the company declined so rapidly. He is also defensive about the huge growth of Carter & Carter.

“It was part of a strategy that the board fully supported and that business would have continued to prosper with Phil at the helm,” he says, refuting any suggestion that the growth had made the company unstable.

“There isn’t a negative perception of so much growth at NCG or at Vision West Notts, or at Learndirect,” he adds, defiantly.

The attitude betrays “an entrepreneurial streak” that Marples, now 49, says first evidenced itself during his childhood in the village of Wirksworth, in the Derbyshire Peak District.

His mother and father, Jean and Walter, ran the local Post Office where Marples tells me he was bought up sitting on the counter, counting money from the age of three and his choice to go into accountancy was, he says, down to his mother.

There isn’t a negative perception of so much growth at NCG or at Vision West Notts, or at Learndirect

“My mother said I was no good with my hands, so I was either going to be a bank manager or an accountant,” he says.

Marples took on an accountancy apprenticeship at Derbyshire County Council at 16, before joining the Audit Commission in 1987 and then being “head-hunted” by consultancy firm KPMG in 1990.

After nearly 13 years he left to join Assa and then, helped by profits from the company’s sale to Carter & Carter and in true millionaire style, he led a consortium that bought Derby County Football Club in 2006. It was, he says, “probably the craziest thing I’ve done”.

“I felt I could run it like a business, and make it successful using business principles,” he says.

But he quickly found that running a football club was not like running a business.

“It’s one of those things that you get caught up in the emotion of buying your club you support, and when you get into it you realise it’s not quite what it seems,” he says.

Under Marples, the club made it to the Premier League, something he is evidently proud of, but in 2008 he decided to sell the club.

His next move was to set up Aspire Achieve Advance with former West Nottinghamshire College principal Di McEvoy-Robinson.

“I didn’t need to do it, but I’m very driven by trying to be successful at whatever I do — and apprenticeships are something that’s really important to me,” he says.

Though nowhere near as large as Carter & Carter, Aspire Achieve Advance has also grown quickly. In September 2012 it teamed up with City of Liverpool College to buy the “majority” of business from First4Skills — a provider behind around 10,000 apprenticeships across the country that had gone into administration.

But  Marples insists there should be no concern about over-expansion.

“We spend a lot of time on the quality side and… talking to employers, learners and staff about how we can continuously improve that quality,” he says.

Marples, who is married to the Aspire Achieve Advance quality and compliance director Sarah and has two children, Thomas, aged 20, and Samantha, 23, is reticent about his life outside of work.

He seems to be someone who does not switch off easily, although he’s clearly committed to his charity work with Children in Need and Frazer’s House, which helps parents of children suffering with brain tumours.

“Being successful brings lots of different types of rewards,” he says.

“It’s not about writing cheques. Anyone can write a cheque and walk away. It’s about putting your energy and the skills you’ve got into those sorts of things.”

No FE question time on Question Time

Further education figures were left disappointed by a lack of sector talk as Skills Minister Matthew Hancock and Professor Alison Wolf both appeared on BBC Question Time.

Professor Wolf, whose government-commissioned review of vocational education for 14 to 19-year-olds was published in early 2011, and Mr Hancock answered a broad range of questions — but nothing was raised about the FE and skills sector.

They were quizzed about anonymity in rape cases in light of the acquittal of Coronation Street actor William Roache and whether workers in essential services should have the right to strike, among other issues.

Sue McLeod, principal of MidKent College, where the show was filmed, was one such disappointed viewer, tweeting that the show was “feisty but lacking in #FE relevance”.

Still no end in sight to SFA software nightmare

There remains no end in sight to the problems faced by providers trying to use new funding software to calculate how much government cash they are due.

Skills Funding Agency (SFA) deputy director for programme delivery and performance Rich Williams and deputy director for funding systems Una Bennett (pictured) spoke in a webinar hosted exclusively by FE Week publisher Lsect, presented by FE funding consultant Nick Linford. They spoke about ongoing issues with the new Funding Information System (Fis) software.

I cannot say we have fixes for every one of the [25] known issues for FIS but we are working very hard on that.”

It should have been available in August last year, but was not released until November — and providers say it is still giving unreliable funding data reports.

Mr Williams admitted Fis was still creating inaccurate data and could not say when the issues would be resolved.

He said: “I cannot say we have fixes for every one of the [25] known issues for FIS but we are working very hard on that.”
A spreadsheet on the Data Service’s website has listed more than 70 problems with Fis.

A report issued this week by the SFA also conceded Fis was producing inaccurate data in five out of 12 key reporting areas.
The government’s Learning Aim Reference System (Lars) online search engine should also have been available by last August.

It is supposed to help providers’ management information system (MIS) officers check whether qualifications are eligible for funding, and how much per learner providers should receive.

However, it is still not available and providers are having to use Lars Lite instead — a temporary downloadable database from the SFA that providers claim is also producing unreliable data.

When asked when Lars will be released, Mr Williams said: “Any date I give I would be making up, so I’m not going to give you a date.”
When asked if development of Lars had been paused while the other funding software issues were being resolved, he added: “The focus has been elsewhere, absolutely.”

Many in the sector have claimed the problems with Fis and Lars Lite corrupted key information in the Statistical First Release published on January 30.

A note in the report itself stated: “There is evidence of increased data lag for the first three months of 2013/14 compared to the same period of the previous year.”

Jobcentres steer teens away from traineeships

Jobcentre Plus (JCP) advisers have been told not to direct 18 and 19-year-olds to the government’s flagship traineeship scheme because it would put their benefits at risk, FE Week has learned.

Documents seen by FE Week show staff in a number of JCPs are being instructed to ignore the work experience and employability programme — even though the rule affecting benefits is due to be by-passed.

In the Autumn Statement, Chancellor George Osborne promised trainees would be exempt from the Department for Work and Pensions’ (DWP) rule preventing anyone working or training for more than 16 hours a-week claiming Job Seekers Allowance (JSA).

However, there has been no further announcement, although FE Week understands the exemption could be in place within a month.
In the meantime, an email sent to advisers and managers in one JCP from regional managers said: “Following conversations this week with the DWP, they have said they are currently not promoting traineeships to 18 and 19-year-old JCP customers who are in receipt of JSA. This is because… this group of people would lose their entitlement to benefits.”

Kevin Ayton, managing director of provider KSA Training and Development Ltd, told FE Week that traineeship referrals from JCPs had “dried up by 100 per cent”. He said: “We’re struggling at the moment because the JCPs are bulging at the seams with people who would be ideal for a traineeship but aren’t being offered them.” He added that it didn’t seem to be limited to 18 and 19-year-olds.

“The JCP take on this seems to be a blanket rule until clarification [on the 16-hour rule exemption] from DWP is received,” said Mr Ayton. “A 21-year-old learner who had seen our flier attempted to enrol on our programme but was told by JCP to not do that as her benefits would be in jeopardy.”

Two further JCPs have confirmed that they were following similar ‘ignore traineeships’ guidance.

The email saying not to promote the programme went on to say DWP had raised the JSA issue with the Treasury and was hopeful it would be resolved “quickly”.

It added: “In the interim the advice to advisers and providers is to ensure that any 18 or 19-year-old’s benefit entitlement is checked with their local JCP office prior to starting a traineeship.”

Since the traineeship programme, aimed at 16 to 24-year-olds, was introduced in September, it has suffered with lower than expected uptake and this latest development will do nothing to ease concerns.
A DWP spokesperson said traineeships were “an important part of the government’s long-term plan to create a stronger, more secure economy”.

He added: “Traineeships have the flexibility for providers to design them so jobseekers can participate without it affecting their benefits.”

He said where traineeships offered more than 16 hours a week “it is appropriate that Jobcentre Plus advisers make claimants aware of this and for the provider to consider reviewing the design of the programme.”

However, last month, Andrea Webb, director of traineeship provider Profile Development and Training, told FE Week that designing traineeships around the 16-hour rule was “limiting” and prevented them offering “a meaningful experience”.

Meanwhile, the Association for Employment and Learning Providers (ALEP) had, according to director of employment and skills Paul Warner, “a very productive meeting” met with DWP officials.

He added: “The signs are hopeful that the proposed change with regards to the 16-hour rule as applied to the study element of traineeships will take place shortly.”

————————————————

Editorial 

Keep the flagship afloat

Traineeships should have no enemies and yet there’s been much talk that they’re simply not taking off.

To what extent this has been the case we can’t say as traineeship data did not feature in the most recent statistical first release, despite promises it would be.

Regardless, it’s been clear for some time that the problem has been benefits.

The programme is simply not attractive to learners who stand to lose their Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) — to take part in a scheme that more often than has no immediate financial benefit.

This has been brought home by the email to Job Centre Plus advisers, who are told to steer teenagers clear of traineeships while the wait for the promised JSA exemption for traineeships goes on.

Why isn’t Nick Clegg stepping in and banging heads together? Isn’t the DPM supposed to be sorting out youth unemployment schemes? We know that every day a young person is out of work the harder it will be for them to secure a job.

The FE sector is willing and able to make a success of traineeships, but unnecessary barriers outside of their control put the whole scheme at risk.

Removing these barriers is perhaps the only way to ensure it really is a flagship policy, as opposed to a sinking one.

Chris Henwood, editor (chris.henwood@feweek.co.uk)

Gove attacked over excellent ‘extra-curricular’ claims

Funding for “expensive and untested” free schools should be used to improve extra-curricular activities at existing institutions, Sixth Form Colleges Association (SFCA) deputy chief executive James Kewin has said.

How can they possibly expect the same level of education when resources across the sector are so different?”

His comments follow a speech by Education Secretary Michael Gove at the London Academy of Excellence on Monday, February 3, in which he said he had “never visited a school that excelled academically, which didn’t also excel in extra-curricular activities”.

Mr Kewin hit out over the comments, saying the Department for Education had cut funding for extra-curricular activities by 10 per cent in 2011 and made further reductions which could see some sixth form colleges lose a third of their funding by 2015.

Mr Kewin said a recent £62m investment in nine new free schools for 16 to 19-year-olds would be better spent on existing sixth form colleges.sixth-form-stats_E92

He said: “Mr Gove gave us no indication of how state sixth form colleges are supposed to provide the sort of extra-curricular activities available in the independent sector with just a third of the funding.

“Some of the funding required for these activities could be found if the government stopped lavishing funding on new, more expensive and untested free school sixth form colleges while existing sixth form colleges are being forced to cut courses and reduce the support they can offer to students.”

Ian MacNaughton, principal of Sixth Form College Colchester, said: “In December 2012, Michael Gove said government funding cuts had happened by accident and not by design.

“We have had no sense of rectification, but rather a further deterioration with the funding cuts for 18-year-olds.

“How can they possibly expect the same level of education when resources across the sector are so different?”

 

Boss speaks out over payments ‘dispute’

The managing director of a London-based independent learning provider has defended his firm after details of an alleged subcontractor payment dispute emerged.

James Clements Smith, of Prevista Ltd, a lead provider allocated £3.8m by the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) this academic year, confirmed there was an issue, but claimed to have paid all subcontractors “in line with conditions”.

It comes after several of its subcontractors wrote to other companies with a warning about alleged payment problems, and the SFA confirmed it had received “correspondence” about the issue.
But Mr Clements Smith told FE Week: “The company has paid all sub contractors and partners in line with negotiated and agreed service level agreements [SLAs], in line with funder requirements and in line with our audit practices. All legitimate outcome payments have been passed to our supply chain.

“I understand there is a letter circulating from a group of suppliers. All of whom have under-delivered to beneficiaries and on their SLA agreements with Prevista by some considerable margin.

“The dispute, if there is one, is with these suppliers who are all subject to audit and compliance issues related to their delivery across government funded programmes.

“Audit and compliance is underway across all of our funded programmes and as part of our annual audit cycle. Any dispute which may arise will be subject to legal proceedings.

“Prevista has a strong balance sheet, has been in the market for close to 20 years, has a strong cash balance and has firm contract value for the foreseeable future across a range of funding streams.”

Nine providers held SFA contracts, totalling £1.87m, through Prevista at the start of 2013/14, but other organisations outside the SFA’s remit also subcontract for the organisation.

Among Prevista’s current SFA subcontractors were Westminster Kingsway College and EXG Ltd.

The college has a £166,860 contract with the organisation, and confirmed an issue with payments had arisen, but would not go into detail.

A college spokesperson said: “We can confirm that the college has worked in partnership with Prevista and we are in discussions with them regarding some payments.”

And EXG Ltd, which had a £106,693 contract with Prevista at the beginning of the 2013/14 year, confirmed it ended its working relationship with the firm “earlier than planned”, but would not say why.

It comes after Prevista was rated as grade four, inadequate, in all areas following an Ofsted inspection last June.

The report said that the proportion of learners successfully achieving their qualifications was too low, and that planning and delivery of teaching, learning and assessment did not “provide an effective learning experience”.

The report added there was not enough focus on learners achieving functional skills qualifications, which was undermining success rates for apprentices.

But Mr Clements Smith insisted improvements were being made and claimed Ofsted had since revisited.

An SFA spokesperson said: “The chief executive of the SFA holds a contract with Prevista as the lead provider.
“It is not appropriate for us to get involved in any contractual disputes between a lead provider and subcontractors.
“We have received correspondence on this matter and have passed on the concerns raised to Prevista.”

Principal ‘devastated’ by girl’s nursery death

The principal of a Yorkshire college said she had been “devastated” by the death of a three-year-old girl who got her neck caught in a rope at the college nursery in September 2012.

Unfortunately, it has taken the death of a three-year-old girl to expose the flaws in their health and safety practice…”

York College was found guilty of health and safety breaches over the death of Lydia Bishop, who became entangled while going down a slide on her first day at the nursery.

Alison Birkinshaw, York College principal, said: “This has been an extremely difficult period for all involved and we remain devastated by the awful events of September 17, 2012.

“We deeply regret what happened and can’t begin to imagine the pain experienced by Lydia’s family and everyone affected by this terrible tragedy. They remain constantly in our thoughts.”
A Leeds Crown Court jury heard Lydia lay unnoticed for 20 minutes before any attempt to revive her.

They heard safety measures to stop children using ropes alone or going unsupervised to a slide had not been enforced.

It emerged that the rope that had been left tied to the slide against health and safety policy.

The college was found guilty of failing to ensure the safety of babies, toddlers and pre-school children at its nursery between August 1 and September 18, 2012.

“The governing body and all at York College fully respect the legal judgements made in this case and remain committed to learning from this tragedy,” said Dr Birkinshaw.

“The college took the decision to close the nursery immediately after the tragedy, and it will not reopen.”

Nursery worker Sophee Redhead, aged 25, from York, was cleared of the charges against her at the end of the three-week trial. She had been accused of manslaughter by gross negligence and faced an alternative charge of failing to ensure Lydia’s health and safety.

Detective Chief Inspector Nigel Costello, of North Yorkshire Police, said: “This was an extremely tragic case for all concerned, not least for Lydia’s family who have been left devastated by the loss of their daughter.

“It is only right that a full investigation into her death was conducted to provide her family with some answers and to establish if there was a criminal case to answer.

“Unfortunately, it has taken the death of a three-year-old girl to expose the flaws in their health and safety practices and I hope this case serves as a warning to other organisations that it isn’t enough to just have a procedure written down.”

Judge Mr Justice Coulson said the college would be sentenced on Friday, February 14.

Euro funding could be better spent locally — DWP official

European funding for tackling youth unemployment could have been better spent at local level, a Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) official has admitted.

The head of the DWP European Social Fund (ESF) Division, Angus Gray, told a House of Lords inquiry into youth unemployment that too much of the fund had been spent centrally.

He pledged to ensure more control over the money was handed over the bodies such as Local Enterprise Partnerships (Leps).

Mr Gray was appearing alongside Skills Minister Matthew Hancock and DWP Employment Minister Esther McVey as part of the inquiry by the Lords EU Sub-committee on the internal market, infrastructure and employment, led by Baroness O’Cathain.

Sub-committee member Baroness Valentine said: “We have received evidence from some witnesses that the use of EU funds in England is too centrally-directed and delivered and that this inhibits the development of effective local responses.

“While Leps should have a greater role in determining priorities for the next programming period, we have not been persuaded that the government’s plans give sufficient powers to actors at the local level, particularly when it comes to delivery rather than planning.”

Mr Gray said: “I think what I’d say is those criticisms are absolutely valid of the way we have run the programme to date.

“I always point out that all provision is local, individuals are being helped in a city, or in a town, in a place and they are being helped to connect to the local labour market, but nonetheless it is true that the approach I and my predecessors have been managing over the last seven years has been more national than local.

“But we are changing that for the next programme, and I am testing the faith of people out there in whether they think I am making the change I am saying we are making.”

Mr Hancock also re-assured the committee, adding: “The ESF money has now been devolved to LEPs. Maybe we can use that to demonstrate the strength of our intentions in this area.

“It is true that in many cases funding is demand-driven, i.e. when you get an apprenticeship, that triggers the government funding, rather than giving money to an intermediary to then spend in a particular area. In that sense, it is devolved right to the ground to the employer or to the individual who is doing the training.”

The ESF supports Skills Funding Agency projects worth £874m and other schemes run by the DWP and National Offender Management Service totalling £354.6m.

It also gives an allocation of funding to regions — ranging from £2.8m (Gibraltar) to £403m (London).

The ESF spending across the European Union (EU) amounts to around 10 per cent (£62.4bn) of the EU’s total budget The aim of ESF spending is to support the creation of more and better jobs in the EU.

Provider staff admit ripping off taxpayers

The boss of A4e has spoken of his disappointment at four former employers after they admitted ripping off taxpayers while employed by the welfare-to-work provider.

Ex-A4e recruiters Julie Grimes, Aditi Singh, Bindiya Dholiwar and Dean Lloyd, pleaded guilty to more than 30 charges of forgery and fraud when they appeared  at Reading Crown Court (pictured) on Monday, February 3.

I am deeply disappointed that a small number of people who formerly worked for A4e…”

The case followed a police investigation into financial rewards claimed for helping the unemployed into work through the European Social Fund (ESF) ‘Aspire to Inspire’ Lone Parent mentoring programme, which ended in July 2011.

It is alleged that they forged documentation to support fraudulent claims for rewards for work with learners who had not found work or did not exist over a period of four years until February last year.

Grimes, 51, of Staines, admitted nine charges of forgery and Lloyd, 37, of Milton Keynes, admitted 13 offences of forgery.

Dholiwar, 27, of Slough, admitted seven counts of forgery while Singh, 30, of Slough, admitted two counts of forgery and one of fraud. No date was set for set for sentencing.

Andrew Dutton, A4e chief executive, said: “I am deeply disappointed that a small number of people who formerly worked for A4e on the Aspire to Inspire contract in the Thames Valley up to 2011 clearly let down the people they were supposed to help, and in turn the taxpayer, Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and A4e.

“A4e co-operated fully with the police enquiry, after our own internal investigation first brought these incidents to light.
“Since these events took place, we have augmented our controls and processes to seek to ensure that nothing like this could ever happen again.

“This includes implementing all of the recommendations for improvement made to us by White & Case LLP following their independent review of our core processes.

“Furthermore, rigorous audits undertaken by the DWP and the Skills Funding Agency have concluded that there is no evidence of fraud on any of the contracts that we currently hold with them.

“A4e has, of course, committed to paying back in full the total value of unsubstantiated claims that were made to the Department for Work and Pensions as a result of the activities of these former employees.

“I would also like to say thank you to our 3,000 loyal, hard-working and principled staff who each day deliver public services to the highest standards that help to improve the lives of thousands of the most vulnerable in our society.

“I am intensely proud of what they do and deeply sorry that the allegations have for so long cast a shadow over their good work.”
The trial of eight other ex-A4e defendants, who pleaded not guilty to all charges at Reading Crown Court, including conspiracy to cheat, is expected to start on October 6.

A further defendant, Nikki Foster, aged 30, of Reading, recruiter, was not at court on Monday. She is due to appear
on Tuesday, February 11, over charges including fraud.
All defendants were unconditionally bailed.
[Proceeding]