Graham Hasting-Evans, chief executive, NOCN

Graham Hasting-Evans’s career has revolved around building. “I wanted to do something practical, to build things,” he says.

“And then from building things, I started to build organisations and build people’s skills.”

It’s a career that has taken him from a small Welsh farm, to Libya, Thailand, the London 2012 Olympics and to his current role as chief executive of awarding organisation NOCN.

We liked living in Libya. It might sound strange, but we did

GHE-speaking-(b&w)-e103
Graham speaking at the Continuous Improvement conference last year

The turning point, from building things to building up people, he says, was while he was working at Bristol City Council.

“I will always remember this one chap was brought in to be sacked because he and his whole team — there were four of them — were useless,” says Hasting-Evans.

“So they came in and I sat them down and it turned out that of the four of them, three couldn’t read or write — including the supervisor — and they had never been trained.

“So I got the three that couldn’t read or write into literacy studies at the local college and there was a bit of reluctance, but they did go.

“And about three months down the line, they were one of the better workforce groups, and they were quite productive.

“It taught me that if you can invest in people in the right way, you are giving them something worthwhile, and the employer is getting something worthwhile rather than sacking them and starting again.

“It just taught me the power of training — don’t give up on people, give them a chance and that was it, I just got more and more into it.”

Hasting-Evans, now aged 62, had always wanted to be an engineer and he learned his desire to move forward and meet deadlines from his parents, farmers Nora and John.

If you can invest in people in the right way you are giving them something worthwhile

Graham-in-the-peak-district-e103
Graham at home in Peak District

“My family were farmers and soldiers, and builders, so growing up there was always a sense of ‘that’s got to be done, it’s that time of year, this must be done’,” says the dad-of-two.

“And when I went to university in Cardiff, my engineering courses was like that — things have got to be done, make a decision now and get on with it, so I just got used to that way of thinking.”

Hasting-Evans jumped at the chance to do a degree with a year in the industry, spending six months at an engineering company in Cardiff and six months in Denmark, building a new town which, he says, “was fantastic — that experience was really enriching and opened your mind up”.

It was at university that Hasting-Evans met his future wife, Maggie.

He graduated and was offered a job at the company he had worked for during his course and the following year he and Maggie bought a house and got married.

However, the company had other plans.

“We hadn’t actually lived in the house at this stage, we’d gone on honeymoon, came back on the Monday morning to be told ‘You’re going to Halifax for a year — sell your house, off you go’,” he says.

“So we went to Halifax, then we went to Preston, then we went to Libya.

“I suppose I worked in an industry where people moved around, and moving around the world, I felt, was a great experience.

“Not everyone does — a lot of people were frightened of it… but I love those sorts of things.”

The couple moved to Libya in 1976, during the war between Libya and Egypt.

“That wasn’t necessarily the most pleasant of experiences, but we were safe,” he says.

Graham_Hasting-Evans-polaroid-e103
Graham (right) on site in Benghazi, Libya, in the late 1970s

“We were in Benghazi, probably not that far from the front, but it only lasted about two weeks and petered out.”

He adds: “It was obviously very tense, and there were rumours, people saying ‘they’re going to bomb Benghazi tonight’ and of course it didn’t happen.

“The Libyan people were fabulous, a really welcoming, nice people.

“We liked living in Libya. It might sound strange, but we did.”

Their first son, Edward, was born in Libya, and second son, Geraint, was born in Malta, where Hasting-Evans was sent to work after he had completed his project in Libya.

The family also lived in Thailand, where once again, Hasting-Evans had a brush with political turmoil.

“I was working in Thailand and I had to visit somewhere and the only way to get to it was cutting through Malaysia and back into Thailand — it was the only road through.

“And there were bandits and a war on the border, so I had to have a Thai army platoon take me half way across no-man’s land, then a Malaysian army platoon take me around to the other side, then picked up the other side by another Thai platoon, with about 10 soldiers in an armoured vehicle, then all the way back, so I could spend about three or four hours there doing some work.

“I wondered afterwards, ‘Why am I doing this?’ It was a bit surreal at the time.”

As Edward, now in his 30s, got to eight years old, the family returned to England, and Hasting-Evans began to move towards “building organisations, and building people”.

In 2006, Hasting-Evans was brought onto the Olympic project as head of strategy, and in 2007 moved over to develop the employment and skills strategy for the London 2012 Olympics.

He laughs when I compare him to Hugh Bonneville’s character in the BBC sitcom 2012 about a fictional Olympics delivery team.

“It’s a bit like Yes, Minister, and like anything else there are strains of truth in it but it’s the exaggeration which makes it fascinating TV, and makes everyone laugh and enjoy it,” he says.

“But what struck all of us that worked on it — a really tough, professional team — was the feeling that this is going to get done, we are going to make whatever decisions we need to, whenever we need to make them.”

The £9bn contract involved employing around 100,000 people over the five year run-up to the games and the games themselves.

“We had joined up all the dots, so from Jobcentre Plus to being sifted out to whether you could go through the training, if you pass the training then on to a job,” he says.

“Some had been unemployed and written off, some with three generations of unemployment — but we got them into work, we gave people mentors.

“On that scale, you can do something, you can create a programme over a period, and actually use it to help skills development within the industry — and I enjoyed doing that, it was really fulfilling.”

He adds: “I remember getting told a few years ago, when I was told I was moving to Bristol not to think of it as a challenge — it’s an opportunity.”

Now at NOCN, Hasting-Evans can see plenty of opportunities for the organisation in the sector and finally has no plans to move on.

“I’ve enjoyed my time at NOCN — we’ve got a great board and great teams, so I am enjoying doing that very much indeed,” he says.

———————————————————————————————–

It’s a personal thing

What’s your favourite book?

I recently enjoyed The White Queen. It was historical, which I like, but it was all political intrigue and family and fighting. Before that probably Catch 22, which had the same mixture of intrigue

 

What do you do to switch off from work?

I walk a lot. I live in the Peak District National Park so I go walking in the national park, rambling and scrambling up hillsides and things like that. It helps me to switch off. I’ve also got two Cavalier King Charles spaniels dogs, Betty and Alice

 

If you could invite anyone to a dinner party, living or dead, who would it be?

Alexander the Great and Barack Obama

 

What did you want to be when you grew up?

An engineer

 

What’s your pet hate?

Taking too long to do things. I like to do things quickly, which probably comes from my time in construction. I know people say builders take forever, but in major civil engineering contracting, things have to be done

 

College bursary roll-overs stopped

Colleges are to be stopped from rolling unspent 16 to 19 bursary money of more than £500 over into new financial years, the Education Funding Agency (EFA) has announced.

In new guidance on how bursary money should be spent by providers, the EFA has stipulated for the first time that underspends totalling more than £500 must be reported and handed back.

But the EFA is yet to clarify whether the new rule will come into effect this academic year or in September, sparking concerns from sector leaders.

We’re clarifying the details and whether EFA will allow exceptional cases.”

Julian Gravatt, assistant chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said: “It is late in the day to introduce a new rule on carrying forward underspends, given that colleges and schools have been allowed to do this in the past.

“We’re clarifying the details and whether EFA will allow exceptional cases.”

Stephan Jungnitz, college expert for the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “The EFA’s intention that bursary monies are received by students is of course entirely appropriate, but only allowing £500 roll-over from one year to the next could make life difficult for colleges with large numbers of needy students. Bursary allocations are based on out of date data.

“Colleges need greater flexibility in seeking to address the needs of students from one year to the next.”

And Sixth Form Colleges Association chief executive David Igoe (pictured) said: “My impression is that most of our members spend up their bursary allocations and most actually add to it in order to support all the students in need.

“I suspect they may be more concerned about the ‘beefing’ up of the audit requirement… — audit firms will be getting a guidance note to check proper compliance with the rules for allocating and distributing bursary funds. Up until now the audit regime has been quite relaxed but that is all about to change.”

The EFA guidance says: “Any underspend below £500 from the 2013 to 2014 academic year can be rolled forward into the 2014 to 2015 academic year and used with the discretionary allocation for the 2014 to 2015 academic year.

“If an institution does have an underspend they should check that they are being proactive enough in identifying the students that are in need, or if they are giving them enough money to cover the needs that they have.
“If institutions have underspends of more than £500 that they will not be able to spend within the academic year, they should report it to EFA.”

The EFA declined to comment.

Commissioner claims first scalp

The FE Commissioner has claimed his first scalp with LeSoCo principal Maxine Room standing down at the end of the year.

Ms Room’s resignation from the 17,000-learner college in South East London comes after leadership and governance at the college was criticised by commissioner Dr David Collins.

Dr Collins was sent into the college in January after it was rated as inadequate by Ofsted following a visit by inspectors in November.

Over the last five years I have had the privilege of working with an absolutely fantastic team.

The college, which resigned from the 157 Group after the result, came in for renewed criticism from the education watchdog last month when inspectors said there was insufficient monitoring of sub-standard teaching.
But on Wednesday (May 14), Ms Room said: “It is with sadness that I announce my retirement from LeSoCo this summer.”

She added: “Over the last five years I have had the privilege of working with an absolutely fantastic team.

“The passion, commitment and dedication of the staff at LeSoCo is unrivalled, and the students are simply inspirational. Both students and tutors are united in their ambition, resilience and inclusivity.”

A spokesperson for the college’s board of governors confirmed that governors’ chair John Landeryou, in place since 2012, would remain in post and said: “Maxine Room CBE has decided that at the end of this academic year she will retire from her post as principal, although she intends to remain active in the FE sector.

“The governing body is very grateful for the commitment, passion and leadership that Maxine has shown during her time as principal.

“We will now begin the search for Maxine’s successor, who we hope to have in place by the beginning of the 2014/2015 academic year.”

It had initially looked like the commissioner’s criticism of the LeSoCo leadership fell on deaf ears with a college spokesperson saying late last month that no one at the top was standing down.

Skills Minister Matthew Hancock has since said the commissioner’s findings will be made public, prompting hopes that public pressure could help to force change at failing colleges.

He told FE Week: “I hope publishing the reports of the commissioner will help in two ways. The first is to shed light and transparency on turning around colleges.

“Where colleges aren’t performing we’ve got to make sure that they’re open and honest about that and take action on behalf of students because this is all about improving standards for learners.

“But the other thing is that as the commissioner goes around lots of different colleges he and his team are learning lots of things about good practice, as well as things that need to improve.”

Free school meal pay-outs leave colleges feeling short-changed

Colleges claim they have been left short-changed after learning how much money they will receive to pay for the government’s new universal free school meals programme.

The Education Funding Agency (EFA) wrote to colleges on Monday (May 12) to tell them how much they would receive to pay for meals for disadvantaged learners.

It comes after it was revealed last month that colleges would receive funding equivalent to £2.41 per meal per learner, based on 4.5 days a week and 33 weeks of study a year.

But many providers have complained that the figures they received, which are based on data from previous years, are much lower than what they were expecting,

The extra money is good news, but as the guidance was issued in April and the allocations in May, colleges are going to have to move quickly to get arrangements in place by September. Schools have had twice as much time to prepare for infant free school meals.

and the relatively low government contribution towards set-up costs has also been criticised by the Association of Colleges (AoC).

The DfE was not able to provide a full list of allocations, but a survey of 79 college leaders conducted by FE Week showed that money for set-up costs amounts in most cases to 5 per cent of the total allocation, but capped at £6,000, which means bigger colleges with large allocations will lose out.

The survey also revealed many providers felt they had been short-changed because the number of entitled learners calculated by the EFA was different to the number worked out by the providers themselves.

East Durham College learner services director Mark Moore said the £138,876 his college had been allocated was enough to pay for around 200 meals, when the college paid bursaries to more than 1,000 learners with low household incomes.

He said: “This is yet another burden placed on colleges to administer. In times when college budgets are being cut we are increasingly managing devolved funding. Free school meals is just another to add to the list, along with 24+ advanced learner loans and the bursary which is managed at learner level, high needs funding, again, managed at learner level with masses of localised bureaucracy.

“Adults additional learning support is also managed at learner level along with 16 to 18 vulnerable bursaries. The government is trimming back on costs in their departments and passing the load to individual colleges whose budgets are not being increased to reflect the additional work required.”

Julian Gravatt, assistant chief executive of the AoC, said: “The extra money is good news, but as the guidance was issued in April and the allocations in May, colleges are going to have to move quickly to get arrangements in place by September. Schools have had twice as much time to prepare for infant free school meals.

“Colleges educate the majority of low-income 16 to 18-year-olds and so they will get the majority of the money available, but the start-up funding doesn’t really cover the full cost. Once the arrangements have settled in, it would be worth looking at whether the management of this could be combined with other 16 to 18 support funding.”
The Education Funding Agency declined to comment.

Bright storm continues as Highfield hits back

An awarding organisation has hit back at claims by Bright Assessing chief executive Krissy Charles-Jones about its qualifications.

She had told FE Week that the troubled Warwickshire-based provider was “never approved or used” by Highfield Awarding Body for Compliance (HABC).

But the awarding body has disputed Ms Charles Jones’s statement.

Terry Bloor, HABC quality assurance manager, told FE Week: “Bright was approved as an HABC-approved centre on September 16, 2013, after completing our centre application process and paying the required approval fee [£336].”

He added the company was sent “a centre certificate confirming that Bright had been allocated centre number 13255”.

Mr Bloor said the provider still claimed it was accredited by ‘Highfield’ on its website — five months after HABC suspended ties with Bright without approving any qualifications for its learners [it had not removed the claim as FE Week went to press].

But Ms Charles-Jones said she was “sticking by” her original statement.

She said: “Bright have not received any confirmation from Highfields that we are an approved centre, we have no centre number. We never received a centre approval certificate.”

NCFE (formerly the Northern Council for Further Education) stopped certificating Bright courses in February following its investigation into alleged malpractice. The findings have not been made public, but Bright disputed “the findings and the sanction” and appealed. NCFE has now confirmed it has de-certificated at least one former learner, who took a level three assessing vocational achievement qualification with Bright.

A Skills Funding Agency (SFA) spokesperson indicated several former learners could face losing their qualifications.

She said: “For learners that the agency has funded, the lead providers have been working with NCFE to resubmit their portfolios and arrange for qualifications to be awarded. Privately funded learners are encouraged to contact NCFE.”

She declined to comment on whether the SFA would fund retraining for former learners who had passed publicly-funded Bright courses yet faced losing qualifications.

OCR and Ascentis confirmed last week they had cut ties with Bright — a move which, it is thought, left the provider without an awarding organisation.

OCR declined to comment on whether it would revoke certification from former Bright learners. Ascentis had “no concerns” about validity of its certificates.

Ms Charles-Jones said she planned to complain to Ofqual about NCFE, claiming the awarding organisation was to blame for former learners’ qualifications being revoked as it had not carried out sufficient “external moderation” of Bright courses.

She said: “Learners should not be concerned if they have contacted NCFE and have been told they are not registered, this is because they are about to become registered as we are data cleansing and collating our final lists.”

Ofqual said it was “being kept up-to-date” on the NCFE appeals process and enquiries should be made to its helpline on 0300 3033346.

Learners should email vocational.qualifications@ocr.org.uk, qualityassurance@ascentis.co.uk, or service@ncfe.org.uk for advice.

Mr Bloors told FE Week:

“Following its approval, Bright put numerous references to being approved by us on its website, including the HABC logo.

“We have asked Ms Charles-Jones to remove the ‘Highfield’ reference [on Bright’s website], but have not been provided with a response.

“Following Bright’s approval and prior to its suspension, HABC held ‘centre visits’ at Bright’s head office in Alcester on two separate occasions.

“On no occasion in our meetings or in the numerous correspondences between HABC and Bright (including Ms Charles-Jones) has Bright questioned whether they were indeed an approved centre, including correspondence confirming approved centre status had been suspended in December 2013.

“Neither have they questioned the whereabouts of an approval certificate or approval number.

“Bright’s centre status has now been permanently removed by HABC. We will under no circumstances work with Bright or Ms Charles-Jones in the future.”

Former BIS chief in governance warning

The former head of skills investment at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (Bis) has warned that entrepreneurial education in colleges must be underpinned by good governance.

Dr Susan Pember, now education and management adviser to the Association of Colleges, told delegates at the Gazelle Annual Summit on Tuesday (May 13) that moves to make FE institutions more enterprising “need to be built on really sound accountability systems”.

Dr Susan Pember
Dr Susan Pember

She said: “My message to you is probably what some of you don’t want to hear but I’m going to say it anyway.

“I’ve had the privilege of going into colleges up and down the country and I’ve seen some absolutely brilliant stuff but also seen some stuff where if you tried to be entrepreneurial on top of that your college would come crumbling down.”

The question for colleges wanting to be more entrepreneurial, she said, was “how do you balance risk and compliance?”

“It’s wrong, isn’t it?” she told the audience at assembled at London HQ of BIS.

“When you think of entrepreneurial things, you think of it as being not bureaucratic, not regulatory and not having rules and regulations.

“However, if you’ve got a really sound base… then it’s easy to move up.”

She pointed to her experience of visiting good and outstanding private providers and colleges.

“They were very clear about their governance structures, and by being clear about your governance structures, you give staff the freedom to innovate,” she said.

Dr Pember’s comments came the same week the Inspiring Governors Alliance, a group dedicated to encouraging high-calibre people to become governors, was launched and followed publication of the Leadership of teaching, learning and assessment by governors report by 157 Groups and Ofsted [see feweek.co.uk for coverage of both].

Skills Minister Matthew Hancock also spoke at the conference.

He told FE Week that for him, enterprising colleges were “innovative, self-confident, have strong leadership and good governors that hold the feet to the fire of principals and holds them to account for what they deliver.”
But, he said, he was unwilling to define what exactly an entrepreneurial college was.

“The great thing about entrepreneurial colleges is there’s so many different ways to define it that I wouldn’t want to restrict that,” he said.

“What I’m trying to do is release the constraints that are put… onto colleges so that they can respond to the needs of their learners and crucially, be held to account for what they achieve.”

Click here to read the Gazelle summit expert pieces from Signe Sutherland and Sharron Robbie

Providers in dark about job status of learners

More than half of providers are failing to meet targets for collecting data about the employment status of their learners, figures released by the government have revealed.

The figures in the latest Individualised Learner Record (ILR) have revealed that 50.3 per cent of providers (481) missed an Information Authority (IA) target of 0.6 per cent for the number of learners for which they do not hold employment status information upon enrolment.

The sector as a whole, against the 0.6 per cent target, in fact had 8.2 per cent as “unknown” or “not provided”.

The target was for the halfway mark of the current academic year, but the result could mean that the employment status of tens of thousands of learners is not clear.

However, Steve Hewitt, strategic funding, enrolments and examinations manager at Morley College, said there was no consequence for failing to hit the target.

“The reason some [providers] are missing that target is there’s nothing that happens to us if we don’t provide that information,” he said.

“While they would like 0.6 per cent, the fact is, it’s 8.2 per cent which still isn’t bad for 1m learners.

“For the 50 per cent who are above that target there is no actual comeback.”

Despite the lack of information on learners upon course starts, the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) will, from next year, still be expecting providers to keep track of learners after they have completed courses by providing learner outcome and destination data.

Mr Hancock told FE Week: “Of course there’s always measurement issues around data, and I think that they’re important to resolve. But in a sense they are the means to the end.

“The end is holding colleges, schools, sixth from colleges to account for what they achieve for their students.”

In 2012, FE Week revealed that 40 per cent of providers sent data about apprentices to the Information Authority with details of employment status missing.

This led to calls by the then Shadow Skills Minister Gordon Marsden for the SFA and National Apprenticeship Service to do more to encourage providers to give a full picture.The SFA declined to comment.

Make-up and photography students work on fantasy photoshoot

Level three photography and make-up artistry students from Norton Radstock College worked together on a fantasy-themed photoshoot.

Norton-Radstock-College1--originalwp2The 21 learners were challenged as part of their courses to design, create and photograph a series of imaginative looks for posters that will be displayed around the college.

As well as applying make-up and taking the photos, learners were also involved with adjusting lighting and liaising with models to make sure they struck the right poses.

Faye Griffiths, photography course co-ordinator at the college, said: “It was good to get two diverse groups together to share their skills.

“It was a great success and we are already discussing improvements for next year.”

Cap from left: Models James Milner and Jordan Ashmen are made to look like scary mannequins by make-up artistry student Megan Scott, aged 17, and pictured by photography students Mitch Stock, 17 and Lauren Ashman, 16. Inset:

Photography students William Gill and Jacob Whittaker, both aged 17, prepare lighting for a photo as James Milner watches in the background

ETF_FPS_campus-banner

 

 

 

WHERE IS CAREERS ADVICE GOING

Download your free copy of the FE Week 16-page feature supplement on ‘where is careers advice going’  partnership with ABC Awards.

Click here to download (6 mb)

———————————————————-

Introduction

To the generations of us who remember being asked what we wanted to be when we grew up and being told, no matter what it was, that we had to go to university, the idea of good careers guidance is a bit of an oxymoron.

I am sure I am not alone when I say careers advice was the only bit of my education that let me down.

I was lucky enough to receive guidance outside my school, which led me to the eminently sensible decision to duck the low-hanging branches of an expensive higher education and get immediately out into the real world.

But others are not so lucky, and with the number of 16 and 17-year-olds not in education, employment or training (Neet) having risen from 31,000 between July and September to 38,000 between October and December last year, the need for advice which can get young people back into work or training is as strong as ever.

As so many of our knowledgeable experts in this supplement point out, we are living in a post-Connexions world in which schools have been ordered to fill the void, impartially.

The page opposite paints the picture of this world, how we got here, and what next.

New statutory guidance for schools is key to government hopes for the future of careers guidance, and it is covered across the following four pages.

The post-Connexions world was intended to be one where the newly-established National Careers Service (NCS) would provide key support for schools and colleges, but it has faced its own issues surrounding the nature of its delivery and also funding. These issues are outlined on page 10, along with a view of the future of the NCS from its director, Joe Billington.

Skills Minister Matthew Hancock has previously spoken of the role of the NCS and has now ushered in the new statutory guidance for schools. He faces tough questioning on careers guidance on page 11, before fellow politicians from Labour and the Liberal Democrats have their say on page 12.

Amid the calls for action, and the issuing of new statutory guidance, came a key report on what a school’s careers guidance service should look like — and what it would cost. Professor John Holman was the author and he discusses his report on page 13.

With this focus on schools and their provision, Ofsted gives its view on the situation bearing in mind its inspectors now look at the service before the views of lecturers, learners and practitioners are represented, across pages 14 and 15.

As always, you can tell us what you think on the FE Week website and on Twitter @FEWeek.