Latest news from FE Week

Labour proposals to abolish level two apprenticeships were rejected by Unionlearn at the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) 2020 Vision conference.

Tom Wilson, director of the education wing of the Trades Union Congress (TUC) told audience members in London’s Congress Centre that plans would be a “grave injustice”.

“We do not think that level two should be abolished,” he said on Thursday (February 19).

“I think that would frankly be a grave injustice to the thousands and thousands of apprentices who’ve currently got level two.

“Of course, everybody aspires to level three, we aspire to level three, wouldn’t it be great if level three become the norm?

“But the way to do that is not just to abolish at a stroke level two, it’s to work with employers, work with unions, work with the sector bodies and try and create that sense of progression.”

He described his comments as “a plea for a bit more nuancing and a bit more care in how these issues are expressed”.

Stewart Segal, AELP chief executive, also blasted the policy, saying Labour had “got it all wrong”.

“All this talk of higher apprenticeships is great,” he said.

“But at the same time they’re talking about getting rid of level two and this has to be a ladder of opportunity and in my view it should start at level two.”

The role of apprenticeship providers in ongoing reform discussions was also hot topic as the conference — aimed at examining the future for learning providers over the next five years — opened.

Mr Segal outlined his key issues with the reforms, which have seen apprenticeship standards redesigned by trailblazer groups of employers, and proposals to route funding through employers rather than providers.

“I’m trying to separate the trailblazer and standard issues from the funding issues,” he said.

“We did need to refresh the frameworks — in fact we’ve been putting off doing it for the last few years because we knew something big was coming.”

He said AELP “absolutely” supported the principals of the 2012 Richard Review of Apprenticeships, which laid the groundwork for the reform proposals.

However, he said: “I want to see employers getting control of funding — but not getting the actual pound notes through their bank account, that’s where we have the issue.”

He went on to acknowledge that government was beginning to pay more attention to training providers’ concerns.

“We’ve made our views clear, we hope that if we can work together with all stake holders with all the sector experts we could find the model that will drive that growth that all the political parties have committed to,” he said.

He was followed by Skills Funding Agency (SFA) director of apprenticeships Sue Husband.

“The apprenticeship reforms are crucial in ensuring that apprenticeships are fit for purpose to support the skills system now and in the future,” she said.

“Key to these important changes are making sure that employers are in the driving seat and can shape the competencies required in a successful apprenticeship.”

She added: “The role of training providers is vital for apprenticeships both now and in the future.

“Training providers are expertly placed to step up and influence the future. Your involvement and your voice are crucial.”

The attention turned to Local Enterprise Partnerships in the afternoon with the conference coming just days after the SFA released a document detailing how it planned to increase their influence on skills budgets.

Mr Segal told FE Week this could have a particular impact on his members.

“There are issues for national providers who are delivering locally in multiple Leps. The processes for local links have to take into account that providers and employers often operate across many different Leps,” he said.

“Because of the way that independent training providers are funded by the SFA, ie funded on delivery in response to local employer demand, we are confident that their provision is meeting local economic needs.”

And in a panel discussion at the close of the conference, Mr Segal warned against an overemphasis on localism.

“There has to be a balance between national programmes and the benefits you get from that — being high profile, everybody knows where they stand, everybody has access to it — and then local influence on that national programme,” he said.

“When you’re looking at a core programme like apprenticeships, traineeships, work programmes, they should have some standardisation so everybody knows where they stand, and then if locally that group of organisation can enhance and improve that position then that’s great.

“If it doesn’t look like it’s going right, those national programmes should be challenged by those local organisations, but it’s not about having your own one — we’ve all come from a time when we were involved in Training Enterprise Councils and we had 74 different systems, I don’t think we want to go back to that.”

South East Midlands Lep (Semlep) chief executive Daniel Mouawad said: “We don’t want to be controlling the funds but we certainly want to ensure that we bring the right influence on where the funding goes to ensure that we close the skills gap that is clearly opening up in our labour market.”

Peter Lauener, chief executive of the SFA, sought to reassure providers about the document.

“The main mediation needs to happen between colleges, providers and Leps without SFA getting in the way,” he said.

“The document is about a direction of travel and trying to establish the importance of the Lep relationship, about trying to clarify rules and responsibilities.

“I don’t think people should read into it too much as a definitive fully mapped system, but the devolution agenda is important, its powerful, it’s not going to
go away.”

Main pic, from left: Unionlearn director Tom Wilson, AELP chair Martin Dunford, AELP chief executive Stewart Segal, Skills Funding Agency director of apprenticeships Sue Husband and Professor Bill Lucas, of the Centre for Real World Learning

Throughout the conference delegates had the chance to vote on the issues being discussed. Here’s how the voting went:

Question: How concerned are you about the trailblazer process?

Answers: very concerned — 33 per cent, a little concerned — 57 per cent, fine with it — 8 per cent, and not concerned at all (it will improve the apprenticeship programme) — 2 per cent.

Question: How do we increase the number of traineeships?

Answers: a greater commitment from local job centres to make referrals — 23 per cent, allow all providers access to the programme —18 per cent, improve careers advice offered to young people — 50 per cent, and simplify the contracting process — 9 per cent.

Question: What role should Leps perform?

Answers: improving labour market information — 58 per cent, co-ordinating delivery on the ground — 14 per cent, direct contracts with a Lep — 6 per cent, influencing and monitoring national contracting — 22 per cent.

————————————————————————————————————————————–

Conference-goers have their say

 

FE Week reporters Rebecca Cooney and Sophie Scott hit the AELP conference floor to meet delegates. They asked them (Q1.) what would you like to see all political parties include in their manifestos for the general election? They also asked (Q2.) what is it important for providers to be doing to ensure their survival to 2020 and beyond?

 

 

 

 

Apprenticeships should be “re-made” to give learners expertise, resourcefulness, craftsmanship, business-like attitudes and wider skills for growth, according to a report by the City & Guilds Alliance.

The Alliance has released its report Remaking Apprenticeships (pictured inset above), written by Professor Bill Lucas and Ellen Spencer of the Centre for Real-World Learning at the University of Winchester, which sets out five key recommendations (see below) for government, employers and providers so apprentices can reach six “outcomes”.

The report calls for a shift in focus to improve teaching and a debate about the pedagogy of apprenticeships, along with accessible guidance for employers and providers on teaching and a push to ensure government documents include references to pedagogy.

Kirstie Donnelly, UK managing director of City & Guilds (pictured above), said: “We firmly believe now is the time to remake apprenticeships and that, if we take the right approach and embed learning and assessment at the heart of an apprenticeship, as well as ensure they are designed to meet employers’ needs, we can ensure the UK’s apprenticeship system can compete with the very best on the world stage.”

“This timely report is launched in the run up to a general election where both Labour and Conservatives have promised a huge increase in the number of apprenticeships.

“It proposes a series of practical tools to enable government and the vocational educational sector to work together to rebuild apprenticeships to ensure they become a top choice for both learners and employers in the future, equal to other learning routes in a status.”

The City & Guilds Alliance also includes the 157 Group, the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) and the Centre for Real World Learning.

Stewart Segal (right), AELP chief executive, said: “Apprenticeships are now at the centre of skills development in the UK and therefore this report reinforces the message that high quality work-based learning is the most effective way forward.

“The report makes clear that both on-the-job and off-the-job learning should form a core dimension of an apprenticeship because the combination can help produce the desired job expertise, functional literacies and business-like attitudes required in a modern economy.

“We hope that the new standards being developed under the apprenticeship trailblazers will incorporate the report’s key recommendations.”

Further education colleges are failing to meet employer needs when it comes to digital skills, an influential group of Peers has warned.

In its latest report, Make or Break: The UK’s digital future (pictured below right), the House of Lords digital skills committee claimed that although the FE sector was “best placed” to respond to England’s digital skills gap, colleges needed to “move up a gear”.

In its report out today, the committee said FE colleges were already “well-placed to link local people with training and jobs”, but that evidence showed that there were “pockets of excellence in the FE system, but provision is patchy, unresponsive and not meeting employer needs”.

Committee chair Lady Morgan (pictured), a Labour peer and former chair of Ofsted, described the report as a “wake-up call for whoever forms the next government”.

The report said: “There is an urgent requirement for comprehensive industry input into the FE system. The government should encourage strong partnerships between industry and colleges. Training delivery must be revamped.

“FE colleges need to move up a gear and provide industry-designed and endorsed short courses that are going to lead to a job.”

The report is based on months of evidence-gathering, and includes testimony from business leaders including Siemens skills partner Martin Hottass and City & Guilds chief executive Chris Jones, along with Skills Funding Agency apprenticeships boss Sue Husband, Skills Minister Nick Boles and FE sector leaders, academics and others.

It said skills cash, controlled by the Skills Funding Agency, was “not presently targeted sufficiently to improve the capacity of the UK’s workforce and grow its economy”.

It called for a greater focus on “short, more flexible courses”, and for money to be diverted to making them happen, but it did not go into further detail about how much funding should be re-allocated.

It added: “Provision is cumbersome and slow to adapt. There is a clear opportunity for the government here, to join-up industry, FE and funding.

“The government’s proposals to improve FE will not have the desired effects without an overhaul of the funding system.”

The report said apprenticeships could help “plug the short and medium-term skills gap”, adding: “We believe 16 to 19-year-olds must be targeted by employers, teachers, and careers guidance professionals to enable them to choose and take up good apprenticeships. There is also a need to tackle negative perceptions of vocational education among schools, teachers, head teachers and parents.

“Including a digital element in all apprenticeship schemes, as well as offering more digital apprenticeships for specific technology occupations and sectors (taking into account the predicted changes to the labour market), could improve general digital skills.”

It said: “There is widespread support for the expansion of apprenticeship programmes, but the UK’s interests and ambitions need increased scale. There are not enough apprenticeships in digital subjects or apprenticeship schemes with digital featuring as an important element of content. Apprenticeships need to be seen as a viable alternative to higher education and the more traditional education routes.”

Lady Morgan said: “This report is a wake-up call to whoever forms the next government in May. Digital is everywhere, with digital skills now seen as vital life skills. It’s obvious, however, that we’re not learning the right skills to meet our future needs.

“Our overwhelming recommendation is that the incoming government creates a digital agenda, with the goal of securing the UK’s place as a leading digital economy within the next five years.

“Digital skills can no longer be dealt with by individual departments – this must all join up. We urge the new government to create a cabinet minister post to steer this digital agenda through.”

The National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (Niace) has demanded that the next budget tackle the “crisis” facing adult skills in England.

A new advancement service for the jobless, extension of the apprentice charter, a citizens’ curriculum for employment support allowance claimants and partnerships to help loans boost participation in education are all suggestions made by Niace in its budget submission.

The organisation has made its submission (pictured below right) to Chancellor George Osborne ahead of this year’s budget, which is due to be published on March 18.

In the document, Niace commends its idea of a “national advancement service”, with career coaches and personal budgets for job-seekers, to the Chancellor, along with a proposal to extend the apprentice charter across trailblazers as a “co-designed mark of high quality” to improve standards.

Niace has also proposed the establishment of a citizens’ curriculum for employment support allowance claimants because “current employment programmes are not delivering for disabled people” and asked Mr Osborne to fund local partnerships between employers and providers to make loans work.

David Hughes (pictured above), Niace chief executive, said: “The skills crisis is at the top of every discussion about a stronger and more sustainable economy, and the UK is suffering with chronic low skill levels.

“Our proposals match the rhetoric on skills with tangible policy solutions to better help millions of people trapped in low paid, low skilled jobs.

“We want to see productivity boosted through a new national advancement service that could help 5m low paid workers, an apprentice charter so employers and apprentices get the most from the experience and a citizen’s curriculum approach to basic skills provision for ESA claimants.

“The imbalance in skills funding between younger entrants to the labour market and a comprehensive, all-ages approach needs urgent attention. We call on the Chancellor to back our proposals and build stronger foundations for a higher skilled, higher earning Britain.”

It comes after Niace announced it had been commissioned by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills to evaluate the success of the government’s FE reform programme, following previous research about the sector and potential future developments in 2010 and 2013.

Alongside BMG Research and CFE Research, Niace will conduct a telephone survey and interviews with FE providers to examine how partnerships between local enterprise partnerships (Leps), local authorities and others have helped local provision evolve and try to “understand how providers have reacted to changes in funding and the new requirements around apprenticeships”.

Dr Fiona Aldridge, assistant director for development and research at Niace, said: “The results of this research will be used as the basis for future developments in FE in the next Parliament.

“This is why it is vitally important for the FE sector to be involved and share with us their views on the impact and outcomes of the FE Reform Programme. We need to know what’s worked and what hasn’t, and how learners have been affected as well as providers.”

An “apprenticeship guarantee” will create 80,000 more starts a year by 2020 if Labour forms a government in May, Ed Miliband will pledge today.

In a speech at a Jaguar Land Rover plant in the West Midlands, the Labour leader will outline plans for a guarantee he claims would allow “every school leaver who gets the grades…to begin a high-quality apprenticeship”.

Mr Miliband will claim new measures requiring firms recruiting from outside the EU or bidding for government contracts to hire apprentices, creating a new apprenticeship fast-stream in the civil service and giving employers more control over the government’s apprenticeships budget will add up to 80,000 more apprenticeship starts a year by the end of the next Parliament.

He is expected to say: “For too long this country has believed we can succeed with just some people having access to world-class education, training and skills. So our plan begins with a revolution in vocational education: A new gold standard vocational baccalaureate in our schools; new technical degrees at our universities; and real high-quality apprenticeships as well.

“At the moment just one-in-10 employers in England offers an apprenticeship. Six times fewer high quality apprenticeships than Germany.

“We can do better, and with our plan we will: the public sector playing its part with thousands of apprenticeships; every firm that wins a major government contract required to deliver apprenticeships; every firm recruiting from outside the EU required to do the same; with businesses having more control over the funding.

“It is time to match the aspirations of our young people with the high quality apprenticeships they deserve. So under the next Labour government, if you get the grades at 18 you will be guaranteed an apprenticeship. That is what I mean by a better plan for working people, a better plan for Britain.”

According to the party, the increase in apprenticeships will be paid-for by “reversing the Tories’ rebadging of in-work training schemes for existing employees”.

This relates to Labour’s pledge to scrap apprenticeships below level three and those which are less than two years in duration and comes after a survey revealed that 93 per cent of apprentices over 25 years old already worked for their employer before starting their apprenticeship.

Labour has also said half of the new starts will come from efforts to “reverse the trend” away from young people doing apprenticeships, but has not explained how this will be implemented.

Martin Doel, chief executive at the Association of Colleges, said: “Apprenticeships are important in helping young people into work, and we welcome political support for them. But they are not the only option.

“Employers and colleges should be given the flexibility to work more closely to develop learning programmes and qualifications which are relevant and up to date, so that young people can gain the skills required for the modern workplace.

“Not everyone is ready to start an apprenticeship – particularly those aged 16 to 18 – and a strong pre-apprenticeship programme should be developed to make sure they are prepared for the world of work.

“Careers advice and guidance needs to be improved to make sure young people can find information about what is available for them when they leave education.”

A spokesperson for the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) said: “We support the drive to increase the numbers choosing an apprenticeship and the commitment to ringfence the apprenticeships budget is very welcome.

“We believe that can be done by driving the demand by employers and young people rather than using legislation designed to require employers to employ apprentices.  On the idea that winning government contracts should be tied to offering apprenticeships, our view is that this might prompt companies to train more staff, but it is not something that should be used as a quota.

“Driving growth from legislation simply causes too great a risk of apprenticeships being created for the wrong reasons.

“However we do support Ed Miliband’s proposal that there should be a major increase in the number of apprenticeships in local and national government, government agencies and the NHS.”

The principal of an FE college is planning to take-on students left stranded after an academy trust dropped plans to open a specialist STEM (science, technology, engineering and maths) school sixth form in Croydon.

STEM Academy Trust had originally planned to open the school sixth-form at the former South Norwood police station, in Croydon, in September last year.

This never happened and the trust announced on Monday (February 9) that it no longer intended to push ahead with the plans, even though the Department for Education said today that it had already bought the ex-police station in anticipation of it being turned into a school.

Frances Wadsworth, principal of Croydon College, told FE Week she had decided to put on a special session at the college’s next open day for up to 50 students and their parents that it is thought applied for places at the STEM Academy and now need to find an alternative place to study.

She said: “We already offer all STEM subjects to A-level and their equivalents, as well as apprenticeships in these areas. We are in the second phase of significant investment in STEM after creating two new labs last year, and we’re investing in enhanced engineering and science facilities and equipment ready for September.

“If we can help these stranded students and their anxious parents, we will.”

Tony Sewell, local chair of governors, STEM Academy Croydon Gateway, said: “We have taken the decision not to continue with our proposal to open STEM Academy Croydon Gateway, our planned 16-19 academy for Croydon.

“This has been a very difficult decision for the trust to make.

“However, setting up a free school is a major undertaking and at this present time we feel that we are unable to commit the level of resource required to successfully launch a new academy whilst also fully supporting STEM Academy Tech City, our existing 16-19 academy in Islington.

“We would like to thank everyone who has supported our proposal for an academy in Croydon. We remain committed to STEM Academy Tech City and to providing a specialist STEM education to our existing student cohort.”

STEM Academy Trust’s website states that it was founded in 2011 by London Skills and Development Network and The Skills and Development Agency in “recognition of the growing educational, political and business demand for high-quality, relevant and current STEM-related education provision”.

It, the website adds, opened Stem Academy Tech City in Islington, which currently has around 140 learners but has not yet been inspected by Ofsted, in 2013.

A DfE spokesperson said: “No final decisions have been made about the future of the [police station] site.

“When deciding on its future we will ensure we get the best possible outcome for the taxpayer.”

He declined to comment on how much funding DfE had already provided the trust to open the school sixth-form in Croydon.
However, he said: “All approved free school projects are paid a grant to cover costs prior to opening. Where a project withdraws from the programme, all future payments of the grant are stopped and we take steps to recover unspent funds.”

STEM Academy Trust declined to comment on repayments to the DfE.

It came after FE Week reported on Monday (February 9) that Suffolk New College, which runs the New Academies Trust (NAT), had been told by the DfE to hand over its 11 to 16 academy to new sponsors after inspectors gave it grade four results in every area following a visit in early December.

It was also reported in the paper last month that South Gloucestershire and Stroud College had announced that it would become the new sponsor of Forest Academy, formerly Heywood Community School, in Cinderford in the Forest of Dean from March.

The school, given a grade three “requires improvement” rating by Ofsted following inspection in May 2013, had been sponsored by E-Act (formerly EduTrust Academies Charitable Trust), which controlled more than 30 schools before the Department for Education asked it to scale down last year after Ofsted inspectors raised concern about a number of the chain’s academies.

The school, which converted to academy status in 2012, is the ninth to be given up by E-Act in response and the fourth taken on by a general FE college.

A singing science lecturer from Middlesbrough College is in the running for a $1m first-prize after making the top ten of finalists for a competition to find the best teacher in the world.

Dr Richard Spencer is the only teacher in Europe to make the shortlist for the $1m Varkey Foundation Global Teacher Prize.

The A-Level biology lecturer will be flown to Dubai, along with the other nine finalists, for an award ceremony taking place on Sunday (March 15) at the Global Education and Skills Forum.

He was chosen at random as one of three of the original 50 shortlisted candidates to meet Pope Francis at the Vatican in Rome on February 5, at the IV Scholas Occurentes World Educational Congress.

Dr Spencer, who encourages learners to join in science-inspired role-playing, YMCA-style dance routines and reworkings of popular songs with lyrics including ‘Don’t blame it on the phosphate’, said: “I still can’t quite believe that I’ve been shortlisted. I keep pinching myself.

“It’s a great honour to be chosen as one of the final ten candidates, all of whom are doing incredible things in the world of teaching and learning.

“I’m very mindful that the whole purpose of the global prize isn’t to make a celebrity out of a teacher, but to celebrate the teaching profession and the importance of teaching.”

Dr Spencer who has previously won the Salter Prize for Teaching Chemistry and two national STAR awards (Further Education Teacher of The Year and Outstanding Subject Learning Coach), studied for a PhD in molecular biology before becoming a teacher.

He was awarded an MBE in 2010 for services to science communication and was named as one of the UK’s Leading 100 Practising Scientists in 2014.

He is a member of three UK science committees — Science on Stage UK, Nuffield Bioethics Education Advisory Group and Commemorating Biology Working Group —and involves his students with presentations at conferences and festivals across Europe.

Dr Spencer, known to his students as Doc, said:  “What I love about teaching is the privilege of working with young people, to fire their passion and reciprocate their energy.

“The buzz of seeing those ‘light bulb’ moments when challenging topics start to make sense for students makes you realise that the hours of planning innovative learning experiences were worthwhile.
“Seeing my students develop in confidence, knowing that I have helped to prepare them for future success way beyond their time with me in the classroom is hugely rewarding.”

The competition, which was launched in March 2014, is widely referred to as the Nobel Prize for teaching.

The other teachers that have made the top the ten are from Afghanistan, India, Haiti, Kenya, Cambodia, Indonesia and the United States.

Zoe Lewis, Middlesbrough College principal, said: “It’s amazing news, we’re thrilled for Dr Spencer and for the college.

“Doc is an inspiration to staff and students and we wish him the best of luck when he travels to Dubai for the final.

“Of course it will be marvellous if he wins, but just getting to the top ten is a magnificent achievement and he’s already a winner as far as we are concerned.”

Main pic: Dr Richard Spencer dancing in the classroom with students. Inset left: Dr Spencer meeting the Pope. Inset right: Dr Spencer

A Labour government would protect 16 to 19 education as part of plans to protect the entire Department for Education (DfE) budget, party leader Ed Miliband has announced.

Mr Miliband set out his party’s policies on education for the May 7 general election in a speech at lunchtime today at his old school — Haverstock, a comprehensive in Camden, north London.

He raised sector hopes through the speech, in which he also said that a Labour government would address poor careers advice at schools and bring about a “revolution in apprenticeships”, that Labour was going protect the entire FE budget including adult skills.

However, this turned out to be untrue.

Mr Miliband said: “If we are to act on the principle that education is a passport to success in life for individuals and our nation’s economy we must be willing to invest in the early years, in schools and in FE.

“The next Labour government will protect the overall education budget, rising budgets protected in real terms every year, not cut as they will be under the Conservatives.”

But a Labour spokesperson later said that Mr Miliband only meant that Labour planned to protect the entire DfE budget, including 16 to 19 education.

He was not, the spokesperson said, referring to Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) education funding.

Mr Miliband’s spending commitment was still welcomed by FE sector leaders.

Martin Doel, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said: “Ed Miliband’s announcement that a future Labour government would protect education funding right the way through from 0 to 18 years old will be immensely reassuring and encouraging to young people and those charged with providing their education.

“Education and training of 16 to18 year-olds is too important to leave to chance.

“College and sixth form students have unfairly borne the brunt of funding cuts for far too long.

“Labour has recognised that in order to sustain and grow the economy our young people need to be supported in developing skills for the global workplace and be protected from future cuts.

“However, education funding still needs to be put on a more rational and stable footing and that’s why the next government of whatever hue needs to prioritise a once in a generation funding review of how money is spent at each stage of education to ensure we can adequately educate and train all children and young people.”

James Kewin, deputy chief executive of the Sixth Form Colleges’ Association said: “This is an extremely welcome announcement that could throw a lifeline to the Sixth Form College sector. The Labour party has responded to the deep concerns of students, teachers and parents that sixth form funding has been cut to the bone over the past five years. Without real terms protection, some Sixth Form Colleges will close and others will only be able to provide an impoverished educational experience to students.

“This is an important step towards addressing the chronic underfunding of sixth form education. As young people are now required to participate in education and training until the age of 18, the current policy of ending funding protection at the age of 16 is absurd. As the Prime Minister confirmed last week that a future Conservative government would continue this policy, there is now a stark choice between the two main parties on sixth form education.”

A spokesperson for the Association of Employment and Learning Providers said: “Apprenticeships, traineeships and study programmes for 16 to 18-year-olds are very important for producing the skilled young workforce that employers are now demanding, so we would be very pleased if the DfE’s budget for these programmes was protected.”

It came on the same day that the Liberal Democrats announced the party’s five priorities for the next five years, which included guaranteeing education funding from nursery to 19-year-olds.

Sally Hunt, the University and College Union general secretary, said: “For too FE has had to bear the brunt of funding cuts. We are pleased that Ed Miliband has pledged the sector will not suffer the same plight under a Labour administration.

“The Liberal Democrats have also put further education at the heart of their election pledges and we now need to see more details from all parties on their plans for education.”

The Conservative Party, which has so far only pledged to ringfence school funding, declined to comment on whether it would extend its commitment to 16 to 19 education.

Picture: Hannah McKay/PA Wire/Press Association Images