Skills Minister admits to ‘nerves’ over making employers cough up for apprenticeships

Skills Minister Nick Boles has admitted to being “nervous” about proposed employer cash contributions towards apprenticeship training costs.

Addressing the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) autumn conference in Birmingham last week, Mr Boles acknowledged employers already contributed to their apprenticeship programmes in “a million ways”.

And he said he was still considering whether mandatory cash contributions would be a good idea.

He said the government was right to pilot its apprenticeship reforms, which include a requirement that employers pay one third of training and assessment costs, but said they would not necessarily work for all businesses.

He said: “I think we should all be honest and observe that the employers involved in delivering apprenticeships under that pilot are employers of a particular kind, a particular depth of resource and the apprenticeships involved are a particular kind of apprenticeship, they’re not necessarily absolutely typical.

“I would like every employer who is creating an apprenticeship to want to dig into their pockets to contribute in cash as well as in all of the other million ways employers do contribute, towards the success of that programme, but the question is, do you require it?

“I am nervous, I think, about the effect, particularly on all those employers which do not currently do apprenticeships, I am nervous about the idea of an obligation to put in cash.”

It comes after FE Week exclusively revealed earlier this month that Mr Boles had hinted at plans to scrap the contributions in his first interview since his appointment in July.

Mr Boles also admitted that the task of getting apprenticeship starts past the 3m mark by 2020, which was set for him by Prime Minister David Cameron in his speech to the Conservative Party Conference, had made his “stomach turn”.

He said the percentage of employers providing apprenticeships was still “tiny”, and added: “We don’t need 10 per cent or 15 per cent of employers doing apprenticeships, we need 40 per cent, 50 per cent, 60 per cent, and that is the really important challenge the Prime Minister has set me.

Crowd-Shot

“It’s not so much the headline number of 3m, though it’s always good to have something which makes your stomach turn slightly as a challenge, it’s the idea that there should be a simple guidance given to every young person.”

He said he wanted young people to understand that apprenticeships and university are the two “gold-plated, gold-standard routes through life” and that government would do “anything in its power” to help people down one of them.

He used his speech to outline his belief in three “profound responsibilities” towards young people held by his generation, which he said had “created the world in which these youngsters are growing up”.

He said the government and providers needed to be honest about the fact that jobs increasingly demand a certain level of literacy and numeracy, and that promoting and boosting functional skills would play a part in that.

He added that young people needed to be “challenged and stretched” but not “mollycoddled”, and said that with this in mind the government had been right to cancel a “raft of qualifications which might have been quite fun to do and…easier and cheaper to teach, but actually provided very little value to the young people taking them”.

He added: “The third responsibility we have towards these young people is to guide them, to steer them, not to leave them stumbling around in the dark without adequate information on which to make the choices about their future lives.

“That’s why as a government we have much more to do on careers advice.”

His comments came after AELP chief executive Stewart Segal told delegates that independent learning providers were continuing to deliver valuable training despite cutbacks at government level.

He said: “There is no doubt that you, and we and the department have faced a lot of change, that’s quite fair. Budgets overall are decreasing, so the value for money issue is more important than ever.

“But within that, we should be pleased that many of the programmes which you deliver, those work-based programmes, those programmes which link with employers, are the ones which have high-priority apprenticeships, work experience within study programmes, traineeships, that’s all very positive.

“And you’re also at the forefront of delivering programmes for the unemployed, which currently gets core non-apprenticeship funding, and our view is that funding should be prioritised as well and programmes for
the unemployed should have a higher priority.”

AELP chair and Skills Training UK chief executive Martin Dunford used his speech to warn the conference that the main political parties were focusing on quantity over quality when it comes to apprenticeships.

He said: “Isn’t it fantastic to have all three parties talking about apprenticeships? They’ve finally got the message, but it’s all about millions, millions, millions. The way they get around the success rates is to say ‘the quality’s not good enough and it needs to be improved’.

“Well actually the success rate is higher than ever, the satisfaction rate is higher than ever, and it’s embarrassing to talk about that when you’re trying to change something that’s not broken.”

But he said he had received a positive response from the new minister.

He added: “In our meetings so far we have seen a very positive response to our ideas and concerns, quite surprising actually. The minister knows that we share the
key objectives for our sector, which is to deliver high quality programmes to meet the needs of individuals and employers.”

Third of employers in dark about their own apprentices

Almost a third of employers with apprentices did not know they were running government-backed programmes, a senior civil servant has admitted.

Jennifer Coupland (pictured), deputy director of the joint apprenticeship unit at the Departments for Education and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, told the AELP
autumn conference that a recent survey of employers had presented some “grim” statistics.

Speaking after Skills Minister Nick Boles, she said: “It’s really heartening to see we are on track now for delivering 2m apprenticeship starts over this parliament. That’s amazing stuff, so you really do deserve a pat on the back. We also know the quality of those apprenticeships has been improving across the last four years.Jennifer-Coupland

“But if you do look under the bonnet, and I don’t want to rain on the minister’s very good presentation this morning, there are some grim facts as well.

“Our last employer survey showed that 29 per cent of employers who had apprentices were unaware of the fact they had an apprentice. They were training somebody, they were aware of that, but they didn’t know the government was paying for a full apprenticeship.

“We also know around a fifth of small firms are unable to find a framework which really does meet their needs, and as the minister has pointed out you’ve still got pretty low penetration into the numbers of employers offering apprenticeships. It’s hovering around the 10 per cent mark depending on how you measure.”

She added: “The reform plan was conceived as a way to address this sort of thing once and for all. To grow the quality and the quantity of apprenticeships, and we are going to do this by making it an employer-driven programme.”

Manifesto calls for investment to fill skills gap

Continued investment to fill the skills gap is a top priority in the newly-rewritten manifesto of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP).

The updated document, which sets out a wish-list for government after the 2015 general election, was unveiled at the organisation’s autumn conference, and puts investment at the core of its message.

The manifesto insists that “tackling growing skills shortages is key to sustaining the recovery,” and that investment is needed to make sure everyone reaches a minimum level of skill, with programmes for the unemployed focusing on early intervention and personalised delivery.

Other priorities for the AELP in its updated manifesto include the need to “grow the credibility of traineeships,” better access to information about the labour market and more integration between programmes and initiatives.

Stewart Segal (pictured), AELP chief executive, said: “Training providers will be encouraged that party leaders have placed apprenticeships among their highest priorities for the next parliament and I believe that growing the programme will not just make a big difference to people’s careers but will also make a significant contribution to answering employers’ skills needs as the economy continues to recover.

Stewart-Segal-1

“However we have shown in AELP’s updated manifesto that other actions are also required to maximise the return and effectiveness of government investment in training in order to underpin a sustainable economic recovery and strengthen social inclusion.”

The manifesto sets out 10 key points for action, including a balanced curriculum in schools with a focus on basic skills and functional English and maths, access to high-quality careers guidance, government funding for basic employability skills
and competencies up to level two, better access to information about the labour market and training options and
high-quality apprenticeships and traineeships.

Other points include an insistence that apprenticeship reforms must not risk the disengagement of young people and smaller businesses, increased credibility for traineeships, more coherent procurement across government departments, an emphasis on the “important role” of local enterprise partnerships and the need for open and transparent funding.

Second academic issues guidance criticism

Further education sector bodies have called for action after another academic criticised careers advice in England.

In a report written for the Sutton Trust, Professor Tristram Hooley of the University of Derby described statutory guidance issued by the government on careers advice as “weak” and called for the role of the National Careers Service (NCS) to be extended and its website reviewed.

The report, entitled Advancing Ambitions, is the second of its kind this year after Sir John Holman, Emeritus Professor at the University of York, said advice had “failed young people for generations” in his report entitled Good Careers Guidance, written for The Gatsby Foundation in April. It comes after the government passed the legal responsibility for careers advice on to schools in 2011, and earlier this year clarified statutory guidance to require schools to specifically promote vocational routes in their advice.

Professor Hooley said: “These changes have resulted in a major reorganisation of the delivery of career guidance in schools.

“Unfortunately this has not been monitored in any systematic way, and only limited attempts been made to measure the impacts of the changes. We need a much stronger NCS to support schools and colleges in delivering for young people.”

But Brian Lightman, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “This report provides yet more evidence about the need for young people to have access to face-to-face guidance from a qualified careers professional. There is no need for any further reports about this matter. It is time for action.” Dr Mary Bousted, general secretary at the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said: “There is a limit to the amount of research about the weakness of careers advice which the government can ignore.”

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “We know there is much more to do and we are looking closely at how we can further strengthen the system to ensure that every child has access to the support they need to make the right choices at the right time.”

 

‘Light-bulb moments’ figure in final IfL survey

The results of the final Institute for Learning (IfL) survey of teachers and trainers in FE and skills are presented by Shane Chowen, IfL policy officer (communications and research).

graph

It has been a privilege to work for FE teachers and trainers as the IfL’s policy officer for the last three years.

My policy colleague Rachel Cooke and I have worked together, consulting IfL members and representing their views on a plethora of consultations involving more than 50,000 practitioners.

Often, these were in reaction to government or sector organisations and so, given the pace of change in FE and skills, we rarely had the opportunity to ask the questions we really wanted to ask.

In June, the IfL launched what was to be our final major member consultation — an omnibus survey for members and non-members to complete over the summer.

The questions were designed to provoke reflection and creativity, two things that IfL has long valued in the considered insights of teachers and trainers.

The survey, and consequently the report of the findings, had three main sections: questions about professionalism, professional identity and careers; questions about policy; and questions about continuing professional development.

We received more than 1,200 responses. One of the best things about working for IfL has been the ability to connect with practitioners across all parts of the FE and skills sector. This survey was no exception.

We had responses from teachers and trainers in the armed forces, public services and employer providers as well as FE colleges and independent training providers.

We wanted to be able to record the reflective perspective of practitioners on what it is about the job that gets them out of bed in the morning and what can be improved.

More than anything, it seems that the central motivation for teachers in FE and skills is the successful achievement and progression of learners.

Time and time again we saw phrases like “light-bulb moments,” “when students get it” and “when you see learners get where they wanted to go”.

In terms of improving the job, practitioners across the sector talked about redressing the balance between teaching and administrative duties.

Shane Chowen
Shane Chowen

Echoing the sentiments articulated by Education Secretary Nicky Morgan in her speech at the Conservative Party conference this year, teachers and trainers in our sector do not feel that enough time can be dedicated to planning and evaluation, thus potentially inhibiting creativity and innovation in the classroom.

Too many examples were presented of planning, reflection and professional development not being considered legitimate parts of the working week.

Careers advice and guidance is a big theme in our sector’s narrative, but how often do we invest attention to the career paths of our own people?

Our research highlights that most teachers and trainers see career progression in terms of becoming more advanced and experienced teaching professionals, rather than being ‘promoted’ to management positions.

Teachers and trainers in FE and skills are aspirational, and IfL research shines a light on the kinds of roles and activities — teaching, management, professional or academic — they consider in their career aspirations.

If an FE teacher or trainer were appointed as the minister responsible for the sector after the next general election, the lack of fair funding would be a key priority.

his finding comes from an open question inviting survey participants to list five things they would seek to achieve if they were the minister for FE and skills. Other priorities included reinstating requirements for teachers to undertake teacher training; ensuring school leavers had the right skills to progress to FE; and increasing freedoms and flexibilities for teachers by redressing workload issues.

Teachers and trainers also felt that their local labour markets were failing to provide good jobs for their learners; that the general public had become more aware of FE than previously; and that the current education and skills system was not sufficiently accessible for adults who need retraining.

I commend these findings to the sector as valuable insight for further development of pedagogy, policy, professionalism and professional development in our sector.

Pictured: a selection of the findings from the IfL report Pedagogy, policy and professionalism — its final survey

WorldSkills wins £18m BIS boost

The government has pledged to continue funding the Skills Show, skills competitions and the UK’s entry to WorldSkills for another two years.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) promised £18m for Find a Future, which organises the Skills Show and WorldSkills, spread over 2015-16 and 2016-17.

From April, the funding will be routed through the Education and Training Foundation (ETF).

Find a Future chief executive Ross Maloney said he was “pleased” by the move, which he described as a government commitment “to continuing its investment in young people, and the development of their skills”.

A BIS statement said the decision to route funding through the ETF would bring the Skills Show and Skills Competitions closer to sector-wide activity on professional standards and employer engagement.

David Russell, ETF chief executive, said bringing together the ETF’s work and Find a Future would “provide great opportunities to build on the success of The Skills Show and WorldSkills UK Skills Competitions in our mission of supporting standards of vocational excellence”.

Find a Future will also raise cash by increasing commercial sponsorship of shows.

 

QCF ‘needs fixing, not ditching’

Ofqual has been urged not to “throw the baby out with the bathwater” after its boss hinted the Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF) could be scrapped.

Federation of Awarding Bodies (FAB) chief executive Stephen Wright said he would like to see the brand and good elements of the QCF retained after Ofqual chief executive Glenys Stacey said it had been “found wanting” at the FAB conference in Leicester on Tuesday (October 14).

Her comments have been seen as an indication the QCF had already been written-off by the qualifications watchdog despite a consultation on its future having only ended on Thursday (October 16).

Mr Wright said: “When we consulted members the biggest thing that came out was not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. QCF is not perfect, but needs fixing, not completely ditching.”

A spokesperson for NOCN said: “We do accept that change is necessary to create greater flexibility for the new employer-led requirements and to deal with what we see as important issues of ‘un-intended’ consequences deriving from the funding arrangements.

“But reliance on the General Conditions of Recognition as a replacement for an employer-recognised framework is inadequate to meet the needs of our economy and will in our view undermine public confidence in vocational qualifications.”

Ms Stacey, said: “However well-intentioned the QCF may have been, we have looked at the reality on the ground and we have found the QCF wanting.

“We know and have heard about how difficult its introduction was, that some awarding organisations were forced to shoehorn good qualifications into the QCF.

“That’s not to say that all QCF qualifications are not fit for purpose, there are strong qualifications in there. But in many cases the QCF rules have done the opposite .”

Ms Stacey also revealed that the requirement for qualifications to be accredited by Ofqual before they are regulated would be lifted from November 3, a move the watchdog consulted on earlier this year.

“Why? Because we have found that accreditation itself, a check at the start of the qualification, is not an effective way of securing a valid qualification as it runs,” she said.

“It’s easy to assume at the moment that an accreditation process provides a vital seal of approval for a qualification but it does not.”

See page 12 for an expert piece on qualifications reforms by former Ofqual accreditation manager Jim Proudfoot

OCR policy director Paul Steer welcomed plans to lift the accreditation requirement, but said: “There is also a need for clearer public communications around the proposals, making it clear to the public that vocational qualifications will continue to be subject to high levels of regulation.”

 

Apprentice group campaigns on childcare

The National Society of Apprentices (NSOA) has called for a childcare funding scheme that hands out up to £8,400 a-year to young adults in FE extended to apprentices.

The group — launched by the National Union of Students (NUS) in March, as reported at the time by FE Week (pictured) — gathered views from 50 apprentices across London, Bristol, Liverpool, Doncaster and Birmingham last month on key issues facing members.

A common complaint, it said, was that Care to Learn, which provides under 20s with up to £8,400 a-year in London and £7,680 elsewhere in England for childcare, was not available to apprentices.

The NSOA has therefore made the issue one of its first campaigns with an aim to make the government extend the scheme.

Another campaign suggestion from apprentices was to develop a new kite mark for “excellent” apprenticeships.

An NUS spokesperson said: “Care to Learn is a lifeline to many young parents who are looking to continue their education while caring for their children. The NSOA think it would be fantastic if its provision could be extended to apprentices.”

A government spokesperson declined t comment on whether Care to Learn would be extended to apprentices, but told FE Week: “Apprentices are entitled to a range of support and financial benefits [but not Care to Learn] in the same way as any other employees — such as child tax credits, to help them support their family and continue their education.

“We have also doubled the number of two-year-olds that are eligible for 15 hour-a-week free childcare to 116,000.”

Parents entitled to child tax credit, which is for example available to most one parent families with a combined income of £26,000 or less, can be paid up to £2,750 a-year per able-bodied child and £7,105 annually for each seriously disabled child.

Npg-edition-95-page-6-ragout-web

David Hughes, chief executive of the National Institute of Adult Continuing Education, said: “This is a good example of how inconsistent and unfair the learner support systems for young people
can be.

“I am sure the intention was never to disadvantage young apprentice parents, but the way this policy [Care to Learn] works means it does. I would hope that common sense prevails and this problem can be addressed quickly.”

The NUS spokesperson said “nothing is solid enough to present just yet” regarding the proposed apprenticeship kite mark.

But, she added: “Apprentices at the events [in London, Bristol, Liverpool, Doncaster and Birmingham] wanted a way of differentiating between apprenticeships. This year the leadership team will be looking at how this might work.”

All providers that train apprentices can register with NSOA. It already represents 150,000 apprentices from 130 registered training providers.

After providers join, their apprentices are entitled to apprentice extra discount cards launched by the NUS in 2012.

 

Study programmes

Click here to download the supplement

Study programmes have had more than a year to bed down now and so it’s a fair time to reflect on what effect they’re having on the FE and skills sector.

While a work experience element is included in the study programme ‘package,’ the most notable component is that of the requirement for learners to achieve English and maths qualifications.

A huge leap in the amount of teaching was always going to be required with providers’ funding dependent on this provision where a learner has not achieved his or her GCSE grade C in the subjects.

And so efforts to meet this demand are covered in our first news item on the page opposite, where there is an update from the Education Funding Agency on its review of planned hours, announced nearly five months ago.

On page 4 there is a more in-depth explanation of study programmes, before the architect of the system herself, Professor Alison Wolf, outlines her view of their progress.

North Warwickshire and Hinckley College and South Leicestershire College principal Marion Plant and National Hairdressers’ Federation chief executive Hilary Hall discuss the impact of study programmes on page 5, before the Ofsted review of last month is covered on the following page.

An exclusive Q&A session with Skills Minister Nick Boles just months into his ministerial tenure features on page 7.

The learner view of study programmes from National Union of Students president Toni Pearce is on page 10, along with an explanation of how the maths element is being handled by providers from Steve McCormack, communications manager at the National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics (NCETM).

With such a monumental change in education policy, where funding shifted from per-qualification to per-learner, there were bound to be knock-on effects — or unintended consequences. These are the focus of page 11.

An exclusive FE Week survey shows how the sector is coping ‘on the ground’ with study programmes, and the results feature on pages 12, 13 and 14, before the work experience element of the system is discussed on page 15 by Fairtrain chief executive Beth Gardner and UK Commission for Employment and Skills senior manager David Massey.

Lambeth strike vote shelved to consider ‘new offer’

A ballot that could have led to renewed industrial action at Lambeth College has been suspended to allow union members to consider a “new” offer, FE Week can reveal.

University and College Union (UCU) members walked out for five weeks from June 3 in a dispute over new staff contracts introduced on April 1, which the UCU said would leave staff with longer working hours, less sick pay and less annual leave.

The UCU opened a ballot on September 22 on whether to launch a new strike ahead of scheduled talks between college and union leaders on October 6.

But a UCU spokesperson said the ballot, which was supposed to close on Monday (October 13), was suspended on Friday (October 10) to allow for consideration of offers made during the October 6 meeting by college management.

He said: “The ballot at Lambeth was suspended following the improved offer by the college management. Members are now being consulted over that new offer and the consultation finishes on Wednesday [October 22].”

A college spokesperson said it had offered a guarantee that staff taken on before April 1 would stay on the original contract until at least September 2017.

Alternatively, existing staff could accept a £1,500 “cash incentive” to transfer to the new contract by September 2016.

The spokesperson said both options would be dependent on staff agreeing to work an extra hour per week from September — increasing their overall annual working hours from 828 to 864.

Mark-Silverman,-Lambeth-web

The UCU spokesperson said members would now vote on whether “they wanted to accept one of the two options or reject both”.

There could be another ballot for strike action if both offers were rejected.

Principal Mark Silverman (pictured) said: “I remain hopeful that UCU members, the majority of whom understand and support the changes that have transformed this college since 2012, will accept our propositions and that we can bring a swift and decisive end to the dispute.”

Meanwhile, the UCU’s FE committee was set to meet on Friday as FE Week went to press to decide how to respond to a court ruling that stopped it launching a national strike.

The protest, which was scheduled to take place on Tuesday (October 14), was called off after the High Court handed down an injunction the day before barring industrial action.

Members were due to walk out over an ongoing row over pay, but the AoC challenged the UCU over the validity of a ballot of members.

Marc Whitworth, acting director of employment services at AoC, said: “Strike action relying on an old ballot was prevented, which meant colleges and their students could go about their day-to-day business as normal.”

The UCU spokesperson said: “We were disappointed the AoC decided to make a late dash to the High Court to overturn the ballot rather than deal with members’ concerns over pay.”

 

Trial over a4e seven accused of fraud offences under way

The trial of seven people charged with fraud-related offences after allegedly ripping off the taxpayer at welfare-to-work provider A4e is under way at Reading Crown Court.

Ex-A4e recruiters Hayley Faye Wilson, Matthew Hannigan-Train, Sarah Hawkins, Serge Wyett, Yasmin Ahmad and former account managers Ines Cano-Uribe and Zabar Mehmood Khalil all pleaded not guilty when the trial opened on Monday, October 6.

The case followed a police investigation into financial rewards claimed for helping the unemployed into work through the European Social Fund (ESF) ‘Aspire to Inspire’ Lone Parent mentoring programme, which ended in July 2011.

It is alleged that they “made false instruments” — forged documentation to support fraudulent claims for rewards for work with learners who had not found work or did not exist over a period of four years until February last year.

Wilson, aged 26, of Milton Keynes, Cano-Uribe, 38, of Madrid, Hannigan-Train, 30, of Bristol, Hawkins, 32, of Bagshot, Surrey, and Wyett, 40, of Richmond, are all charged with conspiracy to make false instruments.

Cano-Uribe and Khalil, 35, of Slough, are jointly charged with making false instruments but separately face further charges — Khalil is charged with a further three counts of making false instruments, while Cano-Uribe faces one more of the same charge.

Yasmin Ahmad, 40, of Colchester, faces charges of making false instruments and making articles for use in fraud.

A Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson said: “Under the terms of the contract, payments were made when the scheme successfully placed individuals in employment.

“It is alleged that many of the reward payments related either to people who never attended A4e or to clients whom A4e had not successfully placed in employment. The contract was to deliver motivation and training and to assist people to find employment.”

Andrew Dutton, A4e chief executive, said: “A4e co-operated fully with the police enquiry, after our own internal investigation first brought these alleged incidents to light.

“Since these alleged events took place, we have augmented our controls and processes to seek to ensure that nothing like this could ever happen again.

“Furthermore, rigorous audits undertaken by the Department for Work and Pensions [DWP] and the Skills Funding Agency have concluded that there is no evidence of fraud on any of the contracts that we hold with them.

“A4e has, of course, committed to paying back in full the total value of alleged unsubstantiated claims that were made to the DWP.”

A CPS spokesperson said the case was expected to run for five weeks in total.

All defendants are on unconditional bail.

[Proceeding]