Sam Parrett, principal, Bromley College

As her heart raced, her mouth dried and her imagination ran wild with the tragic scenes that could lay ahead after reports of a gunman on campus, Sam Parrett was calmed by the wise words of her then-principal.

“No matter how much you’re panicking inside, all the people in that building are panicking much, much more so our job is to keep everybody calm, keep the show on the road, make sure the students become safe, and that the police take away the person with the gun,” she was told by then-Plymouth College principal Bill Grady.

Parrett with, from left, sons, Greg and Ollie at a college award ceremony in December 2014
Parrett with, from left, sons, Greg and Ollie at a college award ceremony in December 2014

Parrett was his vice principal at the time — around 10 years ago — and together they were responding to news a student had brought a gun to college and shot another student.

“I was like ‘Oh my God, what are we going to do?’ and I got into real panic mode,” she explains.

Thankfully, it turned out no student had been shot, while the gunman was swiftly arrested.

However, those wise words in time of extreme stress have stayed with Parrett, principal of Bromley College, in South East London.

“You just learn from that, that so much of your job running a college is to keep the show on the road — whatever it is that’s going on outside,” says 44-year-old Parrett.

“You have to decipher in your own mind which are the policies which are going to impact on you, which aren’t, which are opportunities, which are threats and keep your organisation stable.”

You have to decipher in your own mind which are the policies which are going to impact on you

 

The mother-of-two tells me this while sitting in the college’s plush new training restaurant — itself perhaps testament to her belief in differentiating between challenges and opportunities.

The restaurant is part of a bid to revamp the Orpington campus and make the most of the town centre regeneration — but it’s also the result of a surprise announcement Parrett faced on her second day as principal of Bromley in 2010.

“The principal of Orpington College came to see me and said Orpington was a million and a half in the red, its numbers were falling and the governors had instructed him to find a merger partner,” she says.

“So in that first year where you’re on probation and you’re trying to make a go of being in your first principal’s job, I also had a merger to deal with.”

Parrett, aged one, with her mother Jackie in 1971
Parrett, aged one, with her mother Jackie in 1971

And the restaurant development, says Parrett, was part of cementing that merger.

“I decided we needed to create a focus for Orpington so the staff felt we were investing in Orpington — it wasn’t a takeover or about running it down and then closing this site down,” she said.

At the time of the interview, the restaurant had only been open four weeks, and was staffed by nervous 14-year-old Careers College students — but already it was full and attracting people from outside the college.

Parrett’s own education became something of a “cornerstone” for her, she says, a constant when her father Phil’s job as a salesman meant she had lived in Yorkshire, Lancashire, Gloucestershire and North Wales by the time she was 11, when the family settled in Dorset.

Her parents’ work ethic (her mum Jackie was a sales rep for Pedigree dog food) was passed on to Parrett, who passed her grade eight flute exam — equivalent to a level three qualification — by the time she was 12.

From left: Parrett’s son Greg, Parrett, husband David and son Ollie at Christmas
From left: Parrett’s son Greg, Parrett, husband David and son Ollie at Christmas

However, her A-level results were lower than predicted — thanks, she says, to TV heartthrob Jason Donovan.

“I was doing my GCSEs and A-levels in the first three years of Neighbours,” she explains.

“And I used to run home from sixth form at lunch to watch it, and I never went back afterwards.

“So my A-levels weren’t quite where I wanted them to be so I didn’t go to my first choice university and life began — at Kingston, rather than Warwick.”

However, she says, she should probably thank Mr Donavon, as alongside her sociology degree, she carried on her retail career at Kingston’s newly-opened John Lewis.

By the time she’d finished university and a postgraduate diploma in HR the recession had hit and there were no HR jobs available.

But in her job at John Lewis she had progressed to become a staff trainer and so was able to get a part-time job as an assessor in retail in the early days of NVQs for private provider Link Training.

So much of your job running a college is to keep the show on the road — whatever it is that’s going on outside

 

“So none of my education was at all relevant — but because I’d done this part time job for six years, I had a lot of experience in the retail sector,” she says.

After three years at Link as a regional manager in Berkshire, she was asked by the local training and enterprise council to help pilot the new modern apprenticeships.

Surprisingly, the work was not a million miles away from the focus of today’s apprenticeships reform, she says.

“I think that’s always been the case that apprenticeships are employer-led,” she says.

“Even right back in the early days, we would go out and meet with employers and you had the opportunity to design a local framework and that’s exactly what we were doing 20 years ago.”

The pilots were successful — but Parrett felt she was “in an ivory tower telling people how to do it, which just wasn’t me”.

So in 1997, Parrett walked into an FE college for the first time as a business development manager for work-based learning at Bracknell and Wokingham College, and within six years become a vice principal before heading to the Association of South Eastern Colleges.

Parrett with sons, from left, Greg and Ollie at Osborne House on the Isle of Wight in 2014
Parrett with sons, from left, Greg and Ollie at Osborne House on the Isle of Wight in 2014

From there, she was told she needed more experience in colleges if she wanted to be a principal and was pointed in the direction of Plymouth College, where, she was told, the principal would be able to mentor her.

When a job came up, she applied and was successful — but in between getting the role and starting, the college was slapped with an Ofsted grade four, prompting the principal to leave.

Experienced college troubleshooter Mr Grady was drafted in part time, but the rest of the time Parrett and her fellow vice principal were left holding the reins, an experience she describes as “career defining”.

But after the aforementioned gun incident, Parrett began to look for a college to call her own.

“I went for a job at another college and got down to the last two but wasn’t chosen,” she says.

“And the recruitment agent said, ‘Don’t worry Sam, you get the college which you deserve in my experience — and I’ve got a college up which I think is the right one for you.’”

What makes Bromley College right for Parrett, she says, is its connection with the community.

Parrett in fancy dress as a flower fairy in 1974
Parrett in fancy dress as a flower fairy in 1974

“The principal who left Plymouth College just after I arrived said to me: ‘Don’t live within 30 miles of the college — you won’t be able to into Sainsbury’s on Saturday without a student serving you or everybody knowing your business’,” Parrett tells me.

“And I remember thinking ‘How weird — why would you want to live that far away from the college and the community that you’re working with?’

“And I made up my mind that that wasn’t me really — I live 400 yards from the Bromley campus.”

She adds: “When I talk to my colleagues in the sector there are principals who go round to lots of different colleges, stay for five years and then move on — and then there are others who stay somewhere for 15 years and they get it to outstanding.”

And there seems to be little doubt in Parrett’s mind that Bromley is where she’ll stay.

“I fit here in Bromley,” she says.

It’s a personal thing

What’s your favourite book?

It’s always the latest one that I’m reading — at the moment its Boris Johnson’s The Churchill Factor. It’s all about his leadership style and you’d think there could be nothing new written about that but it’s got the Boris Johnson insight and his interpretation so it’s really an interesting read

Parrett at a college award ceremony in December 2014
Parrett at a college award ceremony in December 2014

What do you do to switch off from work?

Family stuff because I work really long hours so I rarely see my kids during the week, so we go to the gym, kids’ yoga and keep fit tennis. And I’m doing a PhD in my spare time

What’s your pet hate?

Jobsworths — “computer says no” people. I come across far too many of those. And also people who say “that’ll never work”, who aren’t open to trying new things

If you could invite anyone, living or dead, to a dinner party, who would it be?

Gary Barlow, not only because I am of the right era to be a massive Take That fan, but also I had a stillborn baby about three years ago and he went through a similar thing at the same time and he wrote this lovely song called Let Me Go. And [renowned crime writer] Martina Cole — she’s been a really great advocate of the Bromley Children’s University work we’re doing with children here

What did you want to be when you were growing up?

I always thought I was going to be a social worker because I was one of those kids at school who looked after everybody

 

 

Getting on the balcony — sustaining leadership in times of turmoil

Having attended a two-day leadership workshop with Professor Marty Linsky, of the John F Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, Marie-Thérèse McGivern passes on the key lessons and messages she picked up.

I first came across Professor Marty Linsky when I read Leadership on the Line, a
book he co-authored with Ronald Heifetz around 2002.

At that time I worked in local government and was grappling with creating a new vision for the city of Belfast as we turned from conflict and set out to create a new and forward looking city.

I was attracted by one of the opening lines — ‘to lead is to live dangerously’ — which definitely had resonance for the city I was working in then.

Fast forward to the present and I find myself as a college principal living in times of change again, an experience increasingly shared by many like me across the UK.

It is clear to me that what started as ‘austerity’ has now become a paradigm shift in what we recognise as public service.

The question for all of us as public servants is how we can continue to transform people’s lives for the better, which is surely why we turn up every day, while also trying to create the sustainable resource base to continue doing the work.

It is clear to me that what started as ‘austerity’ has now become a paradigm shift in what we recognise as public service

What is clear is that the old givens are going and we will need to find new ways to truly change the world for the better.

We are in the business of changing ‘hearts and minds’ more than just systems.

So, when the 157 Group managed to secure two days’ of Professor Linsky’s time as part of our challenging leadership programme, I was delighted to participate.

And it was worth every minute of the two days spent with more than 30 other passionate colleagues as we sought, against many odds, to keep open the bridge to opportunity and life enhancement that FE offers.

We were introduced to the concept of Adaptive Leadership — the premise of which is that many of the challenges that we face cannot be solved with purely ‘technical’ solutions as they may have been in the past.

The pace of change is now such that many of our obstacles are complex and interrelated and require more flexible and adaptive approaches.

What was clear from the beginning of the workshop was that we were not there to learn some new techniques for heroic leadership.

Professor Linsky made it clear that the capacity for leadership is everywhere and lies with everyone, even in the most mundane of situations.

While we did pick up many tools during the two days, what really enhanced the experience for me was the space to explore from a distance how we could assist leadership in all parts of our own organisations.

Perhaps most powerful was the notion of ‘getting on the balcony’.

This is a conscious decision to actively ‘stand back’, to watch the action, to notice what exactly is going on and, thereby, to get a true perspective.

It sounds deceptively simple but, in the cut and thrust of what many in FE are going through presently, it seems like a luxury to just stop and check.

It’s a practice I am determined to embrace.

There were many ‘a-ha’ moments and the ability to share with other FE-ers built a tremendous solidarity that was at times very emotional as we worked through our own particular challenges with the assistance of Professor Linsky, Mary Joyce and some of the finest practitioners and thinkers in the sector.

Linsky finishes his book with these words: ‘Opportunities for leadership are available to you and to us every day.

‘But putting yourself on the line is difficult work for the dangers are real.

Yet the work has nobility and the benefits for you and those around you are beyond measure.

‘The world needs you.’

Two days with Professor Linsky has left me reinvigorated, determined to unlock adaptive leadership in others and, perhaps, more ready to live in dangerous times.

 

Don’t scrap GCSEs without ‘coherent’ 14 to 19 overview, Labour adviser warns

Labour plans to replace GCSEs with a “national baccalaureate” with both academic and technical routes will only work if those in power take a “coherent view of routes across upper-secondary,” the party’s skills taskforce chair Professor Chris Husbands has said.

Speaking to FE Week this morning, the Institute of Education director (pictured above left) said GCSEs had “less function in the system” than when they were introduced almost 30 years ago, but should not be scrapped without plans in place for an over-arching 14 to 19 education system to replace them.

His comments come after Shadow Education Secretary Tristram Hunt (pictured above right) told the Guardian his party could get rid of GCSEs in the next 10 years, replacing them with a single baccalaureate for 14 to 19-year-olds similar to the one recommended by Mr Husbands’ taskforce, which was initially passed over in favour of the technical baccalaureate.

Mr Husbands said he didn’t take Mr Hunt’s comments as a policy commitment, and said such a move would be difficult “politically” for any party, but added that with the participation age rising to 18 this September, there was less of a need for GCSEs.

He told FE Week: “When I started teaching in the early 1980s, loads of kids left at Easter before they did their exams. Introducing GCSE was a way of keeping them at school. GCSEs have less and less function in the system.

“But we need a coherent view of routes across upper-secondary, and that’s when we can get rid of GCSEs. But, electorally, my understanding from speaking to Conservative and Labour MPs, is that going into an election, getting rid of GCSEs would just be so difficult to defend. It needs to be done with consensus and it needs to be done gradually.”

During the earlier press conference, Mr Husbands said Labour had been wrong not to adopt his proposals for a national baccalaureate, which would have provided a “better map across upper secondary”.

He said: “My preference, and I thought I outlined a deliverable way of doing it, was for a single over-arching baccalaureate framework within which a technical route exists and an academic route exists. I think if you don’t give that, you will end up with fragmentation which is wildly unhelpful.

“I recommended a national baccalaureate. I thought it could have been delivered through a re-thinking of existing qualifications, it wasn’t an expensive route, I think it could have been achieved, and the party said they had decided they would not do that, that they would go with the tech bacc.

“Needless to say I think I was right and they were wrong.”

Ex- Arsenal boss talks to learners

Students at Merseyside’s Hugh Baird 14 to 16 College were left feeling “inspired” after hearing from one of football’s most influential business leaders, David Dein.

The former vice-chairman of Arsenal football club and the FA spoke to learners about his experiences in business and football as part of a visit from Speakers for Schools, a charity that aims to give motivational talks in schools and colleges.

One of his themes was the attitude needed to be successful including persistence and pride.

He also told the learners about his ‘turtle mentality’, explaining that if they did not stick their neck out they would not get anywhere in life.

Alun Owen, director of the college, said: “It was an excellent experience for all involved. Mr Dein really inspired, enthused and gave the learners self-belief that they themselves can go on and achieve in whatever they have a passion for.”

Main pic: David Dein (centre front) talks business with learners from Hugh Baird 14 to 16 College

 

The next government must bring stability to the sector

With further education being placed centre stage in the 2015 General Election, Andrew Gladstone-Heighton considers whether policy change is needed in an industry that has already endured so much recent reform.

The focus on FE seen from each political party so far in this election campaign has been more than encouraging.Issues such as vocational training and youth unemployment are being put front and centre in party manifestos, with both the Conservative party and the Labour Party setting ambitious new apprenticeship figures to achieve over the next five years.

Issues such as vocational training and youth unemployment are being put front and centre in party manifestos, with both the Conservative party and the Labour Party setting ambitious new apprenticeship figures to achieve over the next five years.

The Prime Minister, on his campaign trail, unveiled a series of announcements by UK firms to create new apprenticeships, with Morrisons committing to train more than 9,000 over the next five years, while Whitbread plans to hire 6,000 more by 2020. National Grid and Dairy Crest were also highlighted as committing to take on hundreds more.

This will be welcome news for many, but interestingly is likely to resonate particularly well with the younger electorate.

Our own recent research showed that tackling youth unemployment is the primary concern that young people wish the next government to address, above education policy or even tuition fees.

There continues to be a significant knowledge gap around post-school options among the younger generation, and the main political parties’ much-lauded approach to tacking the issue through apprenticeships is in serious danger of floundering if this is not urgently addressed

With the unemployment rate for 16 to 24-year-olds not in full time education currently over 14 per cent (compared with an overall unemployment rate across the UK labour force of just 5.7 per cent), this comes of little surprise.

However, despite these steps there continues to be a significant knowledge gap around post-school options among the younger generation, and the main political parties’ much-lauded approach to tacking the issue through apprenticeships is in serious danger of floundering if this is not urgently addressed.

Our own research conducted last month found just 18 per cent of 18 to 24-year-olds had even considered undertaking an apprenticeship, and if the Conservatives’ ambitious 3m apprenticeships by 2020, or Labour’s extra 80,000 new apprenticeships a-year, are to be realised, learners need to be properly informed of the value of these earn-as-you-learn schemes.

Labour’s pledge last week to guarantee face-to-face individual career advice for teenagers is a much-needed response to this issue. Also highlighted in their education manifesto is the assurance of budget protection for post-16 education, but we await further detail on this.

Yet the proposal for a new education bill to be introduced within 100 days of the party taking office should they win the next General Election is a concerning one, and raises the question; how helpful is it for a sector that has already been through significant reform?

Labour is right to consider an education system where students can choose between an academic or vocational education at 14. However, reform so soon in the future could create further turbulence for the learner, at a time where they need greater stability and guidance. It’s also unclear how the new proposals would fit in with the newly-introduced careers company.

The next government of this country must be careful not to bring in reform for reform’s sake. Rather they should look to work more closely with a sector that is already under significant pressure having already changed substantially.

A period of education policy stability would be significantly beneficial to employers, too. With limited time and resources to invest in apprenticeships, specifically with small to medium-sized businesses, increased bureaucracy will only help to make things worse.

In order for the next government to meet their ambitious apprenticeship targets, all parties should look to work directly with the education sector, to develop progressive policies rather than tearing up the playbook and starting from scratch.

 

Secret Principal

The principal of a large and well-established FE college writes about life at the top — the worries, the hopes, the people and the issues they have to deal with every day.

Is there a general election? Whither education, education and education?

Is there a general election? Whither education, education and education?Well, we’re all reeling from 24 per cent cuts to adult budgets, but has any front-line politician mentioned this? There are millions fewer adult learners compared to a decade ago.

It’s great that there are now a record number of jobs, but with low levels of productivity in the UK — the main reason for a lull in gross wage increases — does anyone out there think that maybe, just maybe, education and training helps towards improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the UK workforce?

Has every party given up on lifelong learning and the glories and benefits of learning for its own sake? If the UK is a knowledge-based economy are we supposed to gain knowledge by a process of osmosis?

The parties are strangely silent on this. Although they go weak at the knees for apprenticeships — ‘NVQs with knobs on’ (Functional Skills) — they still worry about standards. Assessment-based work inevitably leads to ‘variable practice and outcomes’ and they seem to want to give them to employers. Labour want to beef them up — all level three with a posh title (baccalaureate — if you can spell it do you pass?)

What’s wrong with the other 10,000 adult qualifications? Why cut this funding by a quarter when they cover the knowledge and skills that learners and businesses want.

What is politics?

Peter Hitchens called politics a “mild form of mental illness”; some wag said “it’s showbusiness for ugly people”. Groucho thought “politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies”.

We all want better public services like education, the trouble is most of us don’t want to pay for them — either through tax or directly via fees or loans. Politicians can’t be honest about how they raise money to pay as there are few votes in raising taxes so they pray for growth or run up debts and hope no-one notices. When you see ‘fully funded’ plans in the manifestos — be sceptical. They’ve no real idea what will happen next year, never mind the next five.

So why don’t they say more about education?

Mumbled words about preserving cash budgets in schools and the Lib Dems saying much the same for 16 to 18s, ignoring that post-16 funding rates are 25 per cent lower than pre-16. And significant productivity gains have been sneaked in — witness full-time learner funding from 450 to 540 hours and the £700 cut for each 18 year old — kept under the political radar.

At the very least they could preach the value of learning and encourage it. Do they really like FE?

And if the Government of the day (in this line of thinking Nicola plus Ed) promises an end to Austerity, why has FE been clobbered so hard in Scotland with their mass mergers?

My manifesto — aside from free beer for the workers it would be:

Support the FE sector — all parties make the right noises but then make cuts

Don’t pass money directly to employers — money is wasted eg the employer ownership of skills training pilots; they have their own training budgets

Sixteen to 18 funding rates — align with schools and no more funding cuts in cash terms

Switch other Government training budgets — eg DWP to education and skills to reduce waste

Have less hypothecated funding — leads to underspend or rushed work

We want freedom to follow learner demand, let the customer decide

Stop changing things all the time — Governments of all political hues, however well intentioned, love to meddle and keep changing what we do (which kings are we teaching in history again?), quality measures, systems and methodologies

Unrelenting change doesn’t help anyone. Like-for-like data and quality comparisons are lost over time.

Reagan got it right. He advised politicians: ‘Don’t just do something, stand there!’

This is actually quite profound and applies to the constant tinkering and change that politicians make in Education. Assign the budget, set quality standards and then let us get on with it!

But do vote — democracy is the least-worst form of Government and we get the politicians we deserve. Oh dear.

Jade’s scary start as author

An ambitious young writer from West Suffolk College is hoping to get her career off to a frighteningly good start by self-publishing her horror novel on Amazon’s Kindle.

Jade Klassen, aged 17, first created the plot structure for her book, Reflections of Darkness, when she was just 15.

It took her just nine months to complete the novel about a demon-possessed mother and daughter, and she plans to write three more.

“The paranormal intrigues me. I have an aversion to horror books that have happy endings, I’m much more of a realist and I prefer books that end more darkly,” she said.

Despite her love of writing, Jade studies a level-three business, finance and accountancy BTec course.

“I want to be a full time writer but I know that offers an uncertain future,” she said. “So I decided to train to be an accountant and that way I can always have a steady profession and write in my spare time.”

Main pic: Jade Klassen

 

Boxing clever to raise money in memory of loved one

Shipley College tutor Matthew Green traded in the classroom for the boxing ring to help raise money for the fight against cancer and in honour of his father-in-law, writes Billy Camden.

When Matthew ‘Raging Pig’ Green knocked his opponent to the floor in the second round, he thought the gruelling eight-week preparation for his Ultra White Collar Boxing (UWCB) bout had paid off in style.

But despite a broken nose, Gary ‘G-Dog’ Reeves got back to his feet to the cheers of the 500-strong audience and the fight, to raise money for Cancer Research UK, continued.

“I was thinking ‘don’t get up’ because I was shattered already. But he pulled himself off the floor and fought right up until the end and then I got the majority decision,” said 37-year-old Matthew, a Shipley College level two BTec sport lecturer.

Matthew’s father-in-law Mike Fawcett who died after suffering with lung cancer
Matthew’s father-in-law Mike Fawcett who died after suffering with lung cancer

The fight went the distance — a third and final two-minute round — before Matthew was awarded the win.

He took on the UWCB charity challenge in memory of father-in-law Mike Fawcett, who died 18 months ago after battling with lung cancer.

“You wouldn’t believe how hard it was physically, it is a lot tougher than it looks. Just constantly throwing punches and trying to keep out of the way and the nervous tension that was building up throughout the day really got to me. But overall the match went really well,” said Matthew.

He raised £670, while UWCB has raised more than £1m in total putting on bouts for people with no boxing background and training them for eight weeks.

“When I saw this was a boxing event it appealed to me straight away because I’ve always had an interest in the sport and then when I saw it was to raise money for Cancer Research UK as well I felt compelled to do it,” said Matthew.

Matthew and Gary go toe-to-toe to raise money for Cancer Research UK
Matthew and Gary go toe-to-toe to raise money for Cancer Research UK

“I thought being pushed to the limit and experiencing some pain is nothing compared to what people go through when dealing with cancer so that really spurred me on throughout the whole challenge.”

And mother-in-law Pat was particularly proud.

She said: “He did such a great job and it was a really thoughtful one for him to do. Because my husband died of cancer it was really close to my heart and that was why we as a family wanted to show all of our support to Matthew.”

Matthew said: “To raise that much money for cancer is really something and to know that I played a part in it gives me real pride. I hope it all makes a difference.”

Throughout Matthew’s journey, Shipley College staff sponsored the father-of-five and his students even helped him come up with his ‘Raging Pig’ ring name.

Shipley College principal Nav Chohan said: “Matthew has shown some real grit and determination in taking on this boxing challenge. He is a truly inspirational person and a credit to the college, so we paid for sponsorship of his vest to show our support.”

Matthew’s fight took place on March 28 at The Venue, Halifax.

Main pic: Matthew Green (left) after winning his charity bout in aid of Cancer Research Uk

Photos taken by: Adam Tate

Lewisham Southwark College students’ union president wins NUS election

Lewisham Southwark College students’ union president Shakira Martin was today elected as the next National Union of Students (NUS) vice president for FE.

Trainee teacher Ms Martin (pictured) was elected by delegates at the NUS national conference in Liverpool this afternoon beating Sheffield College students’ union and NUS national executive committee member Amy Smith and Leeds College students’ union member Craig Clements.

It comes after Megan Dunn, the current vice president for higher education, won an earlier vote to become the new national president of the NUS.

Both winners will take up their full-time, paid sabbatical posts in the summer. Ms Martin replaces Joe Vinson and Ms Dunn replaces Toni Pearce.

Ms Dunn said: “Whatever government is in power after next month’s election, it won’t be easy, so we have to be ready to stand up alongside each other and say enough is enough. We need action in union meetings, university boardrooms and in parliament.

“I want to put more effort into supporting campus unions, and transforming our national movement to support the work that you do.

“I’m really proud to have been given this opportunity to build a movement around a vision for apprentices not just with a rise in the minimum wage but with a living wage.

“The end of the false choice between further education and higher education – with the focus on how someone wants to learn and what they want to study rather than what they can afford or what they are told is worthwhile.”

See FE Week edition 136, dated Monday, April 27, for more from the NUS conference.