Hackney Community College and Tower Hamlets College have today confirmed that they will merge from August this year.

FE Week reported last month that talks had started to create a “single, larger and more sustainable college” which will see both colleges keep their individual existing campuses, names and branding.

After the decision was confirmed today, it was announced that Gerry McDonald, principal of Tower Hamlets College, will be the body’s new chief executive.

Both colleges have also agreed that a fixed-term, part-time merger adviser role will be taken up by Ian Ashman, current principal of Hackney Community College, until the end of December.

The position has been set up to “help and support the management teams in the successful implementation of the merger,” a spokesperson said.

The merger will involve a joint institution of around 17,000 students and apprentices, and 800 staff.

A college spokesperson said the new board of governors will be made up of an equal number of governors from the two existing colleges, with a new, independent chair.

The governance structure of the merged college will take on a new name and the spokesperson told FE Week: “We are currently consulting on a new name which will need to be approved by the Secretary of State ahead of the merger on August 1.”

Current Tower Hamlets College chair, Professor Martin Earwicker, and Hackney Community College chair, Tom Mautner JP, said: “This merger, a partnership of equals, brings together two very strong organisations, which play vital roles in their local communities and the wider region.

“While we will maintain the local names and identities of Hackney Community College and Tower Hamlets College, the merger will create a much stronger organisation, which will continue to meet the skills needs of local people, employers and our communities, for the foreseeable future.”

This comes ahead of the government-led London area reviews and after two other large London colleges, City and Islington College and Westminster Kingsway College, confirmed last month they would be merging.

This afternoon the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) sent colleges and training providers their eagerly anticipated funding allocations for next year.

As outlined in the Skills Funding letter for 2016-17, the new Adult Education Budget is to be kept for the next four years at £1.5bn, allowing for the SFA to end the cycle of annual cuts. Priority areas such as apprenticeships and traineeships see automatic provider allocation increases and advanced learner loan facilities, which will be also available for 19 to 23-year-olds for the first time next year, also automatically increase.

The SFA statement to providers reads: “We have now issued provider allocations for the 2016/17 funding year, which includes:

– Maintaining contract values at 2015/2016 (as at January 2016) for the newly formed adult education budget

– 19% increase on delivery over the 12 months from December 2014 to November 2015 for 19+ apprenticeships allocations

– 3% increase on delivery over the 12 months from December 2014 to November 2015 for 16-18 apprenticeship allocations

– 24% increase on delivery over the 12 months from December 2014 to November 2015 for SFA-funded 16-18 traineeship allocations

– 29% increase on advanced learner loan facilities, from current commitments

 

As reported in FE Week, the allocations had been held up by the Budget last week.

The Skills Funding Agency go on to say: “We have made great progress, with the support of our stakeholders, in simplifying the funding system, so far we have:

– begun work on preparing the sector for the devolution of the adult skills budget by publishing the Adult Education Budget: Changing Context and Arrangements for 2016 to 2017

– enabled grant funded providers to use their adult education budget more freely and flexibly in line with local priorities by allocating these funds as a block grant

– started to work with areas with devolution deals to help support their dialogue with their local providers about what will be delivered in 2016/17

– used a simple allocations methodology across all funding streams

– reviewed and rationalised the way we present our funding rules documents, early feedback suggests that this has been well received by our providers – Some 74% of respondents approved of the extent to which our funding rules have removed bureaucracy and simplified the funding system, which remains the same as last year.

– streamlined performance management arrangements for 2015 to 2016

– We have given colleges and other training organisations more flexibility to respond to the needs of their local area, using eligible qualifications and/or their components or bespoke, locally designed or tailored training provision (for example, employability skills and confidence-building).”

The SFA continued: “Over the next few years, we will be changing the basis of our allocation methodology in support of the government’s plans to devolve the adult education budget to local areas: this may result in changes to individual provider allocations over that period. Providers will need to plan for this. We are working with our Funding Reform and Localism Steering Group to develop proposals for how the allocations methodology will change.

“In the funding statement and covering letter issued to providers with their funding allocation, we have signalled that apprenticeship allocations from April 2017 may be subject to change as new starts begin to come through the Digital Apprenticeship Service.  It is important that providers factor this into their planning.  More information on the apprenticeship levy operating model will be published in April.

“We have recently opened applications for growth in line with performance point 2 in our performance management rules 2015 to 2016. We will also be publishing soon criteria for a targeted growth exercise on apprenticeships that we are going to run, ahead of the start of the 2016/17 funding year (related to 2016/17 allocations).”

Commenting on the announcement, Martin Doel, Chief Executive of the Association of Colleges, told FE Week: “It’s good to see the Spending Review commitments being confirmed in year one of the settlement.  After years of damaging cuts these allocations give colleges a firmer base to build on in maintaining services to their students, communities and employers.  It would be even better if the allocations had been earlier and if they could be made on a multiple year basis.”

Stewart Segal, Chief Executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers said: “The increase for adult apprenticeships is very welcome and is further recognition that apprenticeships are regarded as an all-age programme. It will help to reverse the decline in starts we have seen so far this year for the 19-24 age group. Providers will also be pleased that they have an opportunity to offer more traineeship opportunities for young people as the programme is proving to be an effective stepping stone to an apprenticeship and sustainable employment.”

If you have a view on the allocations for 2016/17 please leave a comment below.

FE Week’s second Annual Apprenticeship Conference (AAC) saw more than 900 delegates fill Birmingham’s International Convention Centre for three days from March 16 to 18 to hear the latest on the government’s apprenticeship reforms.

With speakers including sector leaders, key civil servants, government advisers, awarding bodies and apprentices themselves, the conference covered just about every aspect of the apprenticeship programme – except, perhaps, concrete answers from the government on some of the big questions.

David Hill, the first of two Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) representatives, opened the event with an overview of the government’s reforms.

His colleague, Keith Smith (pictured left), the newly appointed head of levy implementation at BIS, revealed a few more tantalising glimpses of how the levy system – the cornerstone of the apprenticeship reforms – would operate.

The levy system will “change how you do business”, Mr Smith said, with providers contracting directly with employers and no longer able to rely on the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) to give them certainty over their budgets.

More detail would be available in April, Mr Smith said, including “a bit about how the system is going to work for those small businesses, and how we see the service for small business developing over time”.

However, some of that detail came a little earlier than April – at the end of the second day, to be precise.

During a Q&A session Nadhim Zahawi (picture below), co-chair of the apprenticeship delivery board, dropped the bombshell that only levy-paying companies will have access to the new funding system when it is launched in April 2017.

“The core offering that we will be launching in April 2017 will effectively be delivering the levy for the two per cent levy payers, while maintaining stability in the rest of the system,” Mr Zahawi, who is also apprenticeship adviser to Prime Minister David Cameron, said.

Sue Husband, the SFA’s director of apprenticeships and delivery service, then confirmed that “non-levy paying companies will still have access to government funding” once the levy has been launched.

This lack of detailed information from government about the reforms led a number of speakers to express their concern and frustration.

During a panel discussion at the end of the first day, Graham Taylor, principal of New College Swindon, called the new system “far too complex, unnecessary waste, increased bureaucracy”.

Stewart Segal, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, criticised the complexity of the system, adding that “the fact is that we’re here only a year way from a complete change and we’re low on details”.

Iain Wright (pictured left), MP and chair of the BIS select committee, was strongest in his criticism. He hit out on Thursday morning, accusing the government of “making this up as they go along”.

“They have announced the policy and now are frantically thinking: ‘How on earth are we going to do this?’” he said.

His comments echoed those made by shadow skills minister Gordon Marsden earlier in the day.

“There’s absolutely no detail frighteningly so close to the implementation date,” he said.

In his keynote speech on the Friday morning, former business secretary Sir Vince Cable added to the criticism.

“What the government has done is to come up with a big idea hoping that the details will sort themselves out. I’m not sure that’s true!” he said.

Elsewhere, Sir Michael Wilshaw – whose speech on Thursday morning was perhaps one of the most hotly-anticipated of the event – was on fighting form as he defended his recent comments about the FE sector.

“It’s not a bias, it’s a criticism of what we see – and have seen for a number of years,” he said.

Alongside these arguments about the pace of reforms and standards, the conference also provided the opportunity to hear from the apprentices themselves.

Shakira Martin (pictured right), vice president for further education at the National Union of Students, exhorted the government to include apprentices in its reforms, calling for the apprentice voice to be “integrated” into the new Institute for Apprenticeships.

This was followed by Laura-Jane Rawlings, founder and chief executive of Youth Employment UK, who gave a compelling reason for including the apprentice voice in reforms.

“How the hell can pale, male and stale know what it’s like to be 16?” she asked.

[slideshow_deploy id=’46141′]

 

Issues with colleges’ “long-standing unsustainable debt” have been highlighted by the FE Commissioner as a key cause of hold-ups with post-16 education and skills area reviews.

Dr David Collins (pictured above) made the point in a letter, dated March 18 but published online by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills today, that went out to all chairs and principals of “corporations and FE institutions”.

It said the area reviews had so far been “a remarkably smooth process with corporations engaging fully in the new collaborative approach to provision”.

But he conceded: “Wave one has taken longer in some cases to come to a conclusion than was hoped, complicated by the devolution agenda and the fact that some of the more difficult areas were included.

“Communications within colleges with staff, unions and students as to the process and the benefits for learners and employers has been variable and could clearly be improved,” said Dr Collins.

He added that “the long-standing unsustainable debt positions of a few colleges have created delays while new solutions have been sought”.

FE Week revealed that wave one of the area reviews was running behind schedule in early January.

We reported that, according to the government’s own published guidance, reviews in Birmingham and Solihull, Greater Manchester, and Sheffield City region, which began in early September, ought to have been wrapping up in February.

However, they appeared to be barely half-way through the process.

The government’s guidance on post-16 education and training area reviews, published in September last year, also gave a “typical timescale” for a review of around three to four months.

However, a spokesperson for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) told FE Week on January 5 that they only expected the first areas “to be moving to analysis of options and recommendations over the next month or two”.

The other areas involved with the first wave of area reviews are Tees Valley, Sussex, Solent, and West Yorkshire.

FE Week understands the final steering group meeting for the Birmingham and Solihull review was held at the start of March — but the conclusions drawn from this have not been made public.

Dr Collins singled out boards of governors at colleges for praise in his letter published today.

“Credit must go in particular to the governing bodies and chairs of the various institutions, who have taken on board a significant amount of extra work and have been prepared to put the interests of learners and employers ahead of those colleges for which they are responsible.

“Without their hard work and commitment relatively little would have been achieved.”

The FE Commissioner also recognised the major role being played in the area review process by local enterprise partnerships and local authorities.

A spokesperson for the Association of Colleges (AoC), said: “Dr David Collins acknowledges in his letter to chairs and principals that there have been some delays with Wave 1 of the area reviews.

“It is good that he recognises some areas where the process needs to be improved.”

BIS was unable to comment on the letter ahead of publication.

Coleg Cambria student Libby Gillard is the winner of this year’s FE Week and Me Photography Competition.

The 19-year-old, who is taking A-levels in psychology, graphic design and photography, was one of 10 entrants shortlisted in the photography student category.

After being told she had won, Libby said: “Oh wow I can’t believe it, it’s amazing, thank you so much. I’m really happy about it, I never expected to get to the top 10 let alone win.

“It is a big shock especially to be chosen from so many entries, it is incredible.”

More than 700 entries flooded in for this year’s competition, in partnership with NCFE, which needed to depict learning environments in the FE and skills sector.

Of her photo, ‘What Lies Beneath’ (pictured), Libby said: “Emotions are often kept underneath the surface but here they are brought above, portraying the many emotions and situations experienced as a student.

“I am passionate about photography and I’m going to study it at Chester University in September and then carry it on and pursue it as a career. My favourite type of photography is macrophotography and portraits hence my entry this year.”

As winner of the competition, Libby will receive a prize of a Nikon D5200 Camera Kit and the opportunity to take part in a work shadowing placement with a professional photographer.

“The camera prize is great and I’m really excited for the work shadowing placement, I’ve not done anything like that before,” she said. “It will be really good to get first hand advice from someone actually doing the job professionally and on a day-to-day basis.”

Shane Mann, managing director of Lsect, which publishes FE Week, was one of the judges. He said: “The quality of entries this year was simply quite stunning, and Libby’s portrait was no exception.

“What I really liked was that it depicted the brief perfectly. It speaks volumes about the different emotions that students experience but are often left hidden. With quality like this it is clear to me that Libby will go on to be a fantastic professional photographer.”

 

A college’s own accounts have questioned its “ability to continue as a going concern” after it was set to receive more than £11m in exceptional financial support (EFS) from the Skills Funding Agency (SFA).

Audited 2014/15 accounts for City of Bristol College (CBC) showed that it had received a total of £6,449,000 in EFS up to the end of July 2015, and had arranged a further £5m in EFS for 2015/16.

The document, published on March 4, also showed that the college, which has an SFA allocation of £15.2m and an Education Funding Agency allocation of £18.7m for 2015/16, had an operating deficit, of over £9m, and was set to sell-off some its property in order to pay off its debts.

“The facts above indicate there is a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the group’s and college’s ability to continue as a going concern,” a note on the accounts said.

The revelations came just days after the government made it clear that colleges will no longer have access to EFS following the area reviews, and would in future be allowed to go bust.

A spokesperson for CBC said: “The college has in place a robust financial recovery plan which is being monitored by both the SFA and the FE Commissioner’s office.

“This plan includes a number of asset disposals which will provide the required funds to pay back the exceptional funding support from the SFA.

“We have undergone major changes in the last year, putting in place an experienced and skilled leadership team in which we are confident will deliver a financial and quality turnaround.”

A spokesperson for the SFA said that CBC was making progress on its recovery plan, but “it is unlikely that a college which requires funding by way of exceptional grant will be suitable for funding by the SFA in the long term without significant change being delivered as part of an area review”.

News of CBC’s financial situation came as the SFA published the 2014/15 college accounts, which showed that seven colleges reported deficits, on continuing operations after depreciation of assets at valuation and before exceptional items and tax, of more than £5m.

These included Birmingham Metropolitan College (BMet), which topped the list with a massive £15m deficit.

Cornwall College Group (CCG) was second, with a £9.1m deficit, followed by Lewisham Southwark College (LSC) and New College Nottingham (NCN), with deficits of £6.7m and £6.5m respectively.

BMet’s deficit, made up of an operating loss of £7.7m and restructuring costs of £8.5m, was due to a combination of reduced funding and historical financial underperformance, according to principal Andrew Cleaves.

CCG said that its deficit was due to a number of factors, including costs associated with its merger with Bicton College, which the college had planned for.

LSC principal Carole Kitching said that her college’s deficit was part of an ongoing decline in quality and finances at the college, which she and her team were working to break.

NCN said that its deficit related to the demolition of one of its campuses, and did not impact on NCN’s financial health.

Neither CBC nor the Warwickshire College Group, which had one of the highest deficits in 2013/14, at £5m, were included in the list of college accounts published by the SFA.

The SFA said that this list was the first draft, and that data from colleges not included in this list would be published soon.

Warwickshire College Group said the group’s 2014/15 accounts had not yet been finalised.

Here are the full responses from the colleges:

Birmingham Metropolitan College:

Andrew Cleaves, CEO and principal of Birmingham Metropolitan College (BMet), said: “The FE sector has been through challenging times of late. Like many colleges, BMet has experienced reductions to funding which, alongside historic financial underperformance, contributed to an operating loss of £7.7m in 2014/15, with restructuring costs of £8.5m.

“In 2015, the new college management team took the necessary actions to improve performance and efficiency, reduce unnecessary costs and generate additional funding and cash to aid recovery. This has included selling off unused sites and buildings. BMet is now well set for the future, more resilient and in a much stronger financial position. We have the full support of our funders, the SFA and the FE Commissioner for our plans which are well underway.

“With that confidence, our focus now is on building a better future for BMet. Our students are at the heart of this and we remain focused on improving their educational experience and giving them the opportunities and support that they need to succeed.

“We are committed to helping more young people and adults get the technical and professional skills they need. We work closely with hundreds of employers across Birmingham and the Black Country, helping them to train and develop the workforce they need now and in the future.

“We are proud of our hard-working students and the expert staff that support them and we are looking to the future with confidence, clear in our role to develop the skills that bring social and economic success.”

Cornwall College Group:

A spokesperson said: “Like the whole FE sector, the Cornwall College Group is dealing with the dual challenge of providing high quality skills education and training within shrinking budgets.

“We were pleased with our recent Ofsted inspection, which graded us as ‘good’ in all categories and provided an external endorsement of our role as ‘a catalyst for raising the skills of the local workforce’.

“We will continue to place offering high quality provision above building high reserves; we are here to help people in our local communities achieve the best they can to support their development and economic growth for the region.

“Four elements have contributed to our current financial position: ‘one-off’ financial treatments and costs associated with merger with Bicton College, increased pensions and restructuring costs, reductions in recruitment and government funding.

“We have always been aware of most of these challenges and the impact on our financial position and have planned accordingly for the next three years. Our financial forecast will move us into surplus for 2016/17 and then over the next three years will re-build levels of reserves without compromising the quality of delivery for our students and employers.”

Lewisham Southwark College:

Carole Kitching, principal of Lewisham Southwark College, said: “As you identify from the published college accounts, Lewisham Southwark College reported an operating deficit of £6.7 million at the end of 2014/15.

“This figure has long been in the ‘public domain’ as it was the key driver in the widely reported Organisational Review at the time. Whilst this review succeeded in reducing pay costs by a similar amount in the short term, recruitment shortfalls at the start of 2015-16 further reduced income and again started to drive up the pay to income ratio to above sector norms.

“The college has continued to make interventions in year to reduce cost again whilst at the same time taking forward plans to grow income, the only really sustainable way to break this cycle.

“What follows are some personal reflections on this journey.

“The college has faced significant challenges over the past three or four years and there are great ongoing challenges in reversing the downward spiral the college has found itself in. As is almost always the case, declining quality and declining finances combined to create a “perfect storm”.

“My role, alongside the new permanent team is to reverse that decline. At the centre of the strategy is restoring the college to the heart of its communities in Lewisham and in Southwark – rebuilding confidence with improvements in teaching and learning and relevance of curriculum and re-engaging with our students, employers, parents, community groups and, of course, our Boroughs. Two Ofsted monitoring visit reports in the past seven months have provided some external validation that we are making progress.

“This is not an easy task but a very rewarding one. By earning the right to our improving reputation we are building up student recruitment again, the lynchpin of any successful turnaround. Pride, the pride of staff in doing a great job and the pride of students in their achievements and in their college are key ingredients. The college recently won Training Provider of the Year 2016 and one of our apprentices Apprentice of the Year in the Creative and Cultural Skills Annual Awards and the boost to morale was humbling to witness.

“Reversing the fortunes of a college such as Lewisham Southwark is not for the faint-hearted.

“The current climate is not supportive of even the most outstanding and financially robust colleges. Whilst it is absolutely right that there should be scrutiny and accountability of how public money is spent the layers of intervention for colleges in difficulties are an industry in themselves and it is a fine balance to take the right actions, make the right interventions, keep accelerating the pace of change and be able to report on this in detail and at length to different agencies.

“There are no secrets about what makes for a successful and sustainable college, no holy grail to distract us. A strong governing board, great teaching and training, a relevant curriculum that engages employers and HEIs, strong recruitment resulting in good class sizes, efficient and effective deployment of staff, decision making that is centred on student need and an organisation that works holistically, not in silos. Colleges have always coped with moving goalposts but there are times when it feels as though the goalposts have been removed altogether and perhaps even that scoring goals is no longer the sure-fire way to win the game.

“Arguably the long-standing sector pride in its agility and its underlying compliance in implementing just about any government change thrown at us has not stood us in good stead. Our university colleagues have not put up with this and are probably stronger for it.

“Local area reviews are a chance to fix things and redefine the sector as something the government actually wants and needs, or our last chance saloon, depending on your viewpoint.

“Radical change often requires radical solutions, challenging the orthodoxy of political intervention in order to secure the opportunity to transform the life chances of our students and communities. If you are not prepared to stand up and speak out for the rights of your students you do not deserve the privilege of leading a college.”

 

Telford College of Arts and Technology:

Jo Lomax, interim principal at Telford College of Arts and Technology, said: “These are challenging times in the FE sector, particularly for colleges with a large adult education provision, where funding has fallen significantly.

“Here at TCAT, we have one of the largest adult education provisions in the Midlands, so there is no doubt that we have been disproportionately affected by the succession of cuts, and changes to Government funding priorities.

“We are currently working closely with the FE Commissioner to help us overcome difficulties that we are facing, and are in the process of reducing staff numbers for the third occasion over the past two years.”

Stockport College:

Simon Andrews, Principal and Chief Executive, stated: “The college has had financial difficulties since the collapse of the then LSCs Capital Build programme, continued funding cuts, and the impact of a failed inspection in 2013.

“The deficit in 2014-15 was due in large part to a number of one offs as the college implemented its recovery plan.

“The underline deficit was in fact an improvement on the previous year. The college is now well on the road to recovery. We are in the middle of an ambitious scheme with partners to sell the college campus and to rebuild a new efficient building in the town centre.

“Added to that we are working through proposals with the area-based review team and the combined authority to form a new bigger college which will be financially resilient and will provide high quality education and training for the local community and beyond’.

Lincoln College:

A Lincoln College spokesperson said: “The accounts published by the SFA reflect our consolidated group accounts and include the first 18-months of Lincoln College International’s operations in The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

“The mobilisation of our KSA colleges included exceptional costs that are currently the subject of negotiations with Colleges of Excellence in KSA.

“As we have stated previously, both Lincoln College and Lincoln College International are forecasting surplus end-of-year positions.

“International development remains an important strand of Lincoln College Group’s financial strategy to reduce our reliance on central government funding. The investment in our academic activities in China and KSA are strategic long-term activities, not financial quick fixes.”

Derby College:

A spokesperson for Derby College said: “The deficit is after a significant number of one-off items which do not reflect on the underlying performance of the college.

“These costs include the costs of restructuring and redundancy (£1,083,000). In addition, due to the significant profit of disposal that we achieved in the year we were able to look at the carrying value of assets that are being held for resale and write them down to a more realistic disposal figure and make appropriate provision for any dilapidation costs associated with subsequent disposal.

“Both of these adjustments did not impact on the cashflow of the college, but were prudent accounting adjustments agreed as part of the year-end audit process.

“Overall the college made a bottom line surplus of £2,556,000 in 2014/15 after the final tranche of disposal of property that was no longer part of our core educational offer. We also improved our cash inflow in the year by £535,000.

“Our underlying operating position was in surplus again. All our financial objectives were achieved to secure sound financial health, including receiving confirmation from the SFA of an overall satisfactory rating, and an outstanding grading for our gearing ratio.

“Today’s position of improved financial health for Derby College can be credited to Mandie Stravino, the chief executive appointed in October 2012 and tasked with, amongst other things, turning finances around. In 2011-12, the college had a £2,200,000 underlying operating deficit and since then we have seen an improving financial position with the last two years achieving positive underlying operating surpluses in excess of budgets.”

Greenwich Community College:

Sam Parrett, principal and chief executive of Bromley College and Greenwich Community College said: “Greenwich Community College has been in a difficult financial position for some years and as a result, was placed in administered status by the FE Commissioner in January 2015. The reasons for this have been well-documented and are a matter of public record.

“Following this, and to avoid closure of the college, the decision to create a federation between Bromley College and GCC was agreed by both Boards of Governors from January 2016.

“With this partnership now in place, Bromley College is working with GCC to address the financial deficit and to secure its future going forward as part of a larger and more financially resilient organisation in line with the recommendations from the FE Commissioner and the Minister.

New College Nottingham:

 

New College Nottingham is due to respond on Tuesday (March 22).

South Thames College:

South Thames College did not respond to FE Week’s request for a response.

 

The apprenticeship levy is a “revenue raising measure” for the Treasury, former business secretary Sir Vince Cable has said.

During his speech at FE Week’s Annual Apprenticeship Conference yesterday, Sir Vince also said the levy was a “good concept” but the detail was “incredibly hazy”.

“I get the impression they [the Treasury] think they can squeeze resources out of BIS [Department for Business, Innovation and Skills] and the apprenticeship levy, I fear, may simply be a revenue raising measure,” Sir Vince said.

“The more it’s a revenue raising measure, the more businesses will be disillusioned, the more businesses will cynically gain in the system – and who would blame them?” he warned.

“I think what we need reassurance on is that this is a genuine mechanism for supporting training and apprenticeship particularly.”

Sir Vince said he had set the levy “in train” during his time in office, from 2010 to 2015 as part of the coalition government, “but it’s turning out rather differently from what I envisaged”.

“We’ve got a good concept that could work, but the detail is incredibly hazy,” he told the audience.

“What the government has done is to come up with a big idea hoping that the details will sort themselves out. I’m not sure that’s true!” he continued.

The more it’s a revenue raising measure, the more businesses will be disillusioned

Sir Vince said he was “worried rather than alarmed” about the levy, and had “several questions” about it.

“Firstly, where is all the money going?” he asked.

If all of the estimated £3bn that the levy is expected to raise “was being ploughed back into training for the companies that took it seriously, I would be enthusiastic about it,” he said.

However, he said he feared the government would use some of the levy money to support training for non-levy paying companies, “so you’ll have cross-subsidy, with an overall reduction in the government contribution”.

“If that is happening then that’s a backwards step not a forwards step,” Sir Vince said.

He also expressed concern that the levy would not boost training levels.

Levy-paying companies may “simply switch from providing training on their own account as they do at the moment, to switching it under the voucher scheme and we have no net increase,” he said.

Sir Vince also described Sir Michael Wilshaw’s recent comments about the FE sector as “very, very unhelpful”.

“I saw this in government, the snobbery of the British establishment towards FE had to be seen to be believed,” he added.

He also warned that forced mergers through the area reviews were in danger of taking the sector “backwards rather than forwards”.

Ofsted’s FE and skills data dashboard is to close just two years after it was launched.

The announcement was made by the inspectorate on its website on March 15.

Yet the dashboard, which was designed to help governors and members of the public keep a check on the performance of providers, was only launched in May 2014.

An Ofsted spokesperson told FE Week that it “regularly reviews its outputs to ensure they are relevant, effective and good value for money”.

He added: “The FE and skills data dashboard was developed two years ago to help leaders and governors manage the performance of FE and skills providers.

“Since then, new products have been made available to the sector, both within and outside government. These provide similar information about FE and skills providers, so we have concluded that the data dashboard is no longer required.”

The Department for Education’s new school comparison tool was opened to the public as a beta service last week.

The spokesperson added: “It can be used to compare performance data across schools, and to check individual schools, using a similar graphical presentation to the data dashboard.”

He continued: “Performance data for further education and skills providers can be accessed using the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) national success rates tables.”

The announcement on Ofsted’s website yesterday stated that the “data dashboards will not be updated with 2015 data”.

“However, the current dashboards will be available until September 30, 2016, after which the dashboard website will close down,” it added.

Ofsted also said: “Users of the FE and skills data dashboard will be able to save the webpages, taking care with the context tab, which contains a filter on the ‘Priorities for industry development’ table.

“The removal of the website will mean that we will no longer hold the dashboards and we will be unable to provide these to users.”

It comes after FE Week reported in May 2014 that governors would be given “greater access to performance information on their institutions through the launch of the dashboard”.