The review into FE funding announced just two days ago by the skills minister might not actually go ahead – at least if remarks made by her boss are to be understood.
Anne Milton announced the review in the House of Commons on March 19, but the education secretary Damian Hinds, whom she reports to, refused to acknowledge it at a committee meeting this morning – casting considerable doubt on whether or not it’s a going concern.
Emma Hardy, the MP for Hull West and Hessle, asked for more information on the review at a meeting of the education select committee, after warning that successive funding cuts had had a grave effect on FE provision.
“Clearly there is a problem with funding for FE. On Monday your department announced a review of FE funding,” she said. “What are the timescales for this and how will it feed into the ongoing post-18 review?”
His response baffled the MPs who were present.
“I didn’t announce a review on Monday,” he said.
He spoke generally about the importance of maintaining a “resilient” FE sector.
“We said quite rightly that we always need to be looking at the resilience of the sector – different parts of the education system including FE colleges,” he said. “The comprehensive spending review will come when it comes and that will be in 2019, but we do know already that with the growth of apprenticeships funding, colleges will get a big slice of that, T-levels will also provide funding.”
Ms Hardy then cut in, saying: “Thank you, so it appears there isn’t a plan to review FE funding.”
Mr Hinds did not correct her, and FE Week asked the the Department for Education for urgent clarification.
They said the review would be going ahead – but it would only be “internal” rather than “external” of the department.
Ms Milton announced the review during education questions on Monday, after she was asked what the DfE had made of “recent trends” in education funding for 16- to 19-year-olds.
Alongside the post-18 review of education funding, she said “we are also looking at the efficiency and resilience of the FE sector”.
“We need to make sure that existing and forecast funding and regulatory structures meet the costs of high-quality, first-class provision,” she continued.
“I’ve asked my officials to assess how far the current funding system meets the costs of high-quality provision in the further education sector and will update the House shortly.”
Your thoughts