AELP dramatically ditches ETF ownership, effective immediately

Exclusive

The Association of Employment and Learning Providers has washed its hands of the Education and Training Foundation, claiming it is “no longer an organisation run by the FE sector for the sector”.

“We don’t feel the programme being proposed and funded by the DfE supports our membership,” said AELP boss Mark Dawe, who insisted the ETF “can’t have its ownership cake and eat it”.

The decision will send shockwaves through the sector. The ETF, which is mostly funded by the DfE, was designed as a “sector-owned” support body, helping train the people who work in technical and vocational education.

As far as the AELP is concerned, however, it no longer operates as an independent body, so much as an extension of the DfE focusing on the incoming T-levels.

“There is nothing really around apprenticeships and work-based learning, when we are probably going through the most significant change in the sector – particularly with the move from assessing to training and end-point assessment,” Mr Dawe told FE Week.

“There is a desperate need for workforce support development so the most fundamental thing that is needed at a critical time has been removed.”

FE Week can reveal that the move was ratified this afternoon at an ETF board meeting, and that the AELP has removed its representation with immediate effect.

The AELP had two trustees on the ETF’s board – Chris Jeffery, a non-executive director of the Skills Group UK, and John Hyde, the executive chair of Hospitality Industry Training.

David Russell, chief executive of the ETF, said his organisation was “disappointed” by the AELP’s decision and would be “seeking discussions” with both the association’s chair and chief executive to “understand more fully their decision and the reasons for it”.

Other part-owners of the foundation include Holex, the adult community education body, and the Association of Colleges.

Established in October 2013 by former skills minister John Hayes, the ETF recently had its mission reviewed by the DfE, resulting in a “narrower remit”.

Mr Dawe claimed his representatives were not allowed to “have any impact” on the ETF’s focus, “so we do not feel like we should continue as an owner”.

The organisation’s total income in 2016/17 was £32.2 million, which included £29.1m in grants from the DfE.

It is understood the government is now pushing the ETF to focus on the introduction of T-levels – which will mostly be taken at colleges rather than private providers – and other mainstream FE provision.

“The work is now being determined by the DfE and not by the ETF at all – they’ve lost their identity and is not representing the whole sector,” Mr Dawe said.

“When ETF was set up under John Hayes it was about giving it all to the sector and allow it to determine what it needs for its workforce. It was by the sector, for the sector, but it doesn’t feel like that is the case anymore.”

Another factor in the AELP’s decision was the fact that the ETF’s “highly successful” Future Apprenticeships programme is being discontinued.

The scheme was launched to help FE teachers and leaders to make the transition from apprenticeship frameworks to delivery of the new standards.

The cancellation comes “at a time when the levy has got off to a less than auspicious start, there are hundreds of new providers in the apprenticeship market and most of the workforce in the sector is having to change and develop”, the AELP said.

The AELP now wants the DfE to give it some responsibility for providing training and continuing professional development (CPD) to its own members.

Mr Dawe added that he is happy for AELP to work with the ETF on programmes relevant to his members.

Mr Russell said support will continue to be available to work-based learning professionals and providers in the sector, “irrespective of whether AELP makes appointments to our board”.



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. I’m glad the AELP have acted on this, too often the government seek to have their agenda ratified by employers and training providers, when its not political policy but civil servants policy that seems to be their purpose. I have been “used” for this myself and also had to stand down, and I’m glad the AELP representatives have seen through this and stood up to be counted.
    We want the youngsters out of school so we can train them properly at work, with release for relevant theory. The DfE want the youngsters in school or college or university to supposedly train them for work but mostly without the infrastructure to do this. A straight forward conflict of interest. I’m sure they think they know best, but I beg to differ and I employ 700 including 30 trainer/assessors.