It will come as no surprise to you when I say funding agencies embark on a complete reworking of their funding rules only with trepidation.

Introducing a new funding system for the further education sector was never going to be an easy task. As I take up my new job as Interim Chief Executive of Skills Funding it feels, more than ever, that the time is right to move on from a complex system that’s creaking from the multiple patches we’ve applied to accommodate new policy over the years.

My ambition is clear: to reduce unnecessary funding complexity and allow colleges and training organisations flexibility so that they can respond to the needs of learners, employers and communities. I want to remove bureaucratic burdens and central control so the sector can maximise its contribution to economic recovery. For without doubt, it is colleges and training organisations that are in the best possible place to identify, interpret and respond to the needs of learners when resources are at a premium. It’s about value, but it’s also about quality, getting the best possible outcome for the learner with the resources available.

So a new single streamlined funding system will replace the previous multiple systems. Simplified funding rates will reduce the number from thousands to around 60; a single earnings methodology will eliminate the risks and complexities of differences between colleges and other training organisations; and a switch from guided learning hours to credits will reduce audit complexity.

For the first time, in response to your comments about our guidance documents, we have produced a single document that sets out the Funding Rules and evidence requirements for the 2012/13 funding year. You will see we have – quite deliberately – exchanged funding guidance for funding rules. Because we want to be really clear, remove ambiguity and eradicate unhelpful phrases such as ‘providers might’ or ‘providers will decide’ and exchange these for ‘providers must’.

We have done away with the additional guidance notes during the year and the ‘forest’ of supporting documents. I hope that you can see a new language and approach that are designed to save time in interpreting guidance at the point of delivery and at audit.

So, really important changes for colleges and training organisations which we hope will be welcomed. But more important than the facts of a new funding system to me is the way we have worked together over the last year to develop the new system. The Agency has been supported, challenged and advised by a sector-led Technical Advisory Group, chaired by David Lawrence from Easton College. I am determined that we will work more closely with the sector, ask the right questions, listen better and respond to what you tell us. And when the time for talking is over, we will act with clarity and confidence because we will have a position the sector believes in.

I am determined that we will work more closely with the sector, ask the right questions, listen better and respond to what you tell us.”

Shadow working of the funding system has already begun and colleges and training organisations are putting in a great deal of time and effort testing and trialling the new arrangements. Their feedback will be invaluable in helping us refine the system and in checking it is operating smoothly. It is this engagement that will ensure that the final system is fit for purpose. We are road-testing something new and one aspect of the system is the rates that we have set for testing purposes. At the end of the summer we will take stock of the feedback and issues raised before finalising the number and value of rates in January 2013.

We have now put out our second Provider Survey, building on last year’s exercise, and we need feedback through this channel on how well you think the Agency is performing. You can also post comment on Twitter using the hash tag #fedebate.

I cannot promise we will always do exactly what you would like but what I will say is that through our dialogue we will foster a mutual understanding that gives us all a stronger voice and tells the story of the difference further education and skills makes to economic and social renewal.

I believe FE is truly remarkable and our reputation goes before us. Let’s use the freedom and flexibility of a new funding era to make skills work for everyone.


By Kim Thorneywork

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Hi Kim, I’m not quite sure where you get 60 rates from? What you’re forgetting is that a learner with an award going on to a cert will have to have their funding reduced, thus creating another defacto rate. And if not all of the award units can be counted towards the cert this rate could be different for each learner in the class… The upshot is there will still be thousands of rates as far as providers are concerned. Personally I favour “per credit” funding that removes the loadband cliff edges and seems pretty straightforward to explain.
    Whilst I welcome talk of collaboration and dialogue there’s been precious little evidence that it is any more than talk. None of the very reasonable suggestions to changes to the 12/13 rules made by the sector were implemented between the publication of the first and second versions and no reasons were given as to why not. We’ve been used to getting little response for quite a few years now, so to show us you’ve changed there will need to be a real push to communicate with providers more effectively.

  2. PeterW

    The current funding system is not at all complicated. However, as the Shadow funding is not available for apprenticeship yet, we don’t what the new rates will be and how they will be calculated.