A college that didn’t make it on to the government’s new Register of Apprenticeship Training Providers has received an ‘outstanding’ grade for its apprenticeship provision – in what was otherwise a relatively quiet week for the FE sector.
The list of providers that will be eligible to deliver apprenticeships from May was published last month by the Skills Funding Agency – however, a large number of major providers of apprenticeships somehow missed out, including at least 18 colleges.
That number included Hartlepool College, with a spokesperson telling Week at the time they were “genuinely stunned” the college, with an apprenticeship allocation of almost £2.9 million, had not made it onto RoATP.
Yet Ofsted has now given the college a grade one for its apprenticeship provision, in an overall ‘good’ new report.
When invited to comment on this, Darren Hankey, principal of Hartlepool College, told FE Week: “Hartlepool College has a long and well-established of providing high quality apprenticeships. We are still shocked at the recent decision to not be allowed on to the RoATP.
“It looks as though there are many other colleges in our situation“, which he added begged the question “if the process used was fit for purpose?”. When previously questioned over this issue, a Department for Education said: “All those that applied to be on the register of training providers were given a clear set of criteria in order to receive funds for apprenticeship training, ensuring they are high quality and capable of delivering the training that young people deserve.”
Inspectors found in the report on Hartlepool College that apprentices receive “excellent support” from their teachers, and make “outstanding progress”.
It added: “Apprentices show high levels of respect for others, and are confident and articulate. They develop a high level of personal, technical and employability skills that employers need, and almost all apprentices make positive and measurable contributions to their workplace.”
The college, which trained nearly 5,000 learners last contract year, received a grade two overall following its previous inspection in 2014.
Just four other FE and skills providers had Ofsted reports published this week, including CTS Training, which slumped from ‘good’ to ‘requires improvement’ in a report published April 3.
Inspectors found that too few learners at the private provider make the progress “of which they are capable” due to “insufficient planning for learning that is based on the identified individual needs of learners”.
The Ofsted report added that leaders at the Sheffield and Rotherham-based provider do not have a “coherent strategy” to drive improvements in English and maths across the company for staff and learners.
The provider trained nearly 3,000 learners over last contract year. To improve, inspectors said the provider needs to ensure that all tutors “understand how to use information about the needs of each learner in order to plan learning activities that support them to make good progress”.
Meanwhile, WEBS Training Limited, in Nottingham, maintained its ‘good’ rating, in a report published April 4.
Inspectors said most apprentices “successfully complete all elements of the apprenticeship framework within the planned period”, and almost all “continue to work for their employer after they have completed their studies”.
They added that leaders have taken “decisive action” to resolve most of the weaknesses identified at the last inspection in 2015.
However, in a few cases, managers at the 300-learner provider “do not provide detailed enough feedback to trainers following observations about how they can improve their practice”.
Employer provider Walsall NHS Trust, which trained just 110 learners last contract year, received a grade three. Inspectors reported that self-assessment and quality improvement planning at the provider is “not robust enough to help managers to secure and sustain high-quality provision”.
They added that the board has not yet set “clear performance indicators” for the apprenticeship programme to hold managers better to account.
Bromley London Borough Council also received a ‘requires improvement’, the same grade it achieved at its previous inspection in 2015.
To improve, leaders must “ensure that they devote more of their time to the consistent application of comprehensive and rigorous arrangements to judge the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, and improve it”.
Two short inspections were also published this week, with E.Quality Training Limited in Staffordshire, and Manchester City Council retaining their grade two ratings.
And Citroen U.K. Limited was found to be making “significant progress” in its second monitoring visit since an ‘inadequate’ Ofsted report in May 2016.
|GFE Colleges||Inspected||Published||Grade||Previous grade|
|Hartlepool College of Further Education||07/03/2017||07/04/2017||2||2|
|Independent Learning Providers||Inspected||Published||Grade||Previous grade|
|Webs Training Limited||07/03/2017||04/04/2017||2||2|
|Adult and Community Learning||Inspected||Published||Grade||Previous grade|
|Bromley London Borough Council||07/02/2017||03/04/2017||3||3|
|Employer providers||Inspected||Published||Grade||Previous grade|
|Walsall NHS Trust||07/03/2017||06/04/2017||3||NA|
|Citroen U.K. Limited||01/03/2017||03/04/2017||M||M|
|Short inspections (remains grade 2)||Inspected||Published|
|E.Quality Training Limited||15/03/2017||07/04/2017|
|Manchester City Council||27/02/2017||04/04/2017|