Download your free copy of the FE Week 16-page special report on the PAYE proposal in the government’s apprenticeship funding consultation, sponsored by Pearson.

Click here to download (10mb)

——————————————————————————————–

Introduction

Time has been called on a consultation into the most radical reform proposals for apprenticeship funding in generations.

The government have confirmed around 350 responses from across the FE skills sector have entered the ring, contributing their views on three possible models for future funding arrangements, which the government hopes will attract more employers to the apprenticeships programme.

The first was a model of direct payment to the employer, the second would allow employers to claim back spending on apprentices through tax credits, and the third would leave funding in the hands of training providers.

Allowing firms to claim back costs through the Pay As You Earn (PAYE) system was always going to be the most divisive option.

It was clear from the moment this was proposed through former Dragon’s Den investor Doug Richard’s review, in December last year, that we might have a split decision.

That is why we decided to focus this week’s 16 page hard-hitting supplement on the fight of the 21st century — at least

in the FE world — over tax credits proposals.

It’s the option FE Week understands has the support of Skills Minister Matthew Hancock, although he was unable to comment while the results of the consultation, which closed on Tuesday, October 1, were still being compiled.

But acting as referee, FE Week has drawn together here some ‘fors’ and ‘againsts’ in debate over use of the PAYE system.

So, seconds out, round one — and in the “red” anti-PAYE corner we have training providers worried about losing control of finances, and organisations representing small businesses, who fear it will put small and medium-sized enterprises off taking on trainees, because of possible added paperwork.

However, there are also several big hitters in the “green” pro-tax credits corner, including the Confederation of British Industry, which insists the simplicity and familiarity of PAYE would attract more businesses to apprenticeships.

The funding model the government eventually settles on will be a key factor influencing the fate of cross-party efforts to drive apprenticeships to new heights.

Latest education roles from

School Operations Partner

School Operations Partner

London Diocesan Board for Schools

Director of Adult Learning – Newham College London

Director of Adult Learning – Newham College London

FEA

Assistant Principal – Construction & Engineering

Assistant Principal – Construction & Engineering

Middlesbrough College Group

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer

Concordia Multi Academy Trust

More Supplements

College pulls statement about its future after failing to get DfE sign off

The now-retracted Havant and South Downs College press release claimed it has a ‘strong and independent future’

Josh Mellor
Josh Mellor

Brenda McLeish quits Learning Curve Group

McLeish has also resigned from the board of AELP

FE Week Reporter
FE Week Reporter

Sixth form college teacher banned for life over sexual messages to student

Leaders 'shocked and saddened' but 'confident this was a one-off'

Anviksha Patel
Anviksha Patel

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. garrie owens

    Just reflecting on the recent poor ofsted inspections of employers own apprenticeship provision and wondering is this model going to significantly going to impact on the quality of apprenticeships. Moving to a price vs content tender model will this mean that the apprenticeship will be delivered by the lowest priced bidder?
    The thought of having to tender with multiple organisations and having a mutliple contract and price model across apprentichip provision is only add cost to the training provider