The Church of England offensive in FE colleges must be resisted

20 Jun 2021, 6:00

The Church’s proposals have little to do with education and more to do with reversing its declining numbers among young people, write Chris Higgins and Keith Sharpe

The Church of England is on a missionary offensive in our FE colleges. This is the thrust of a recent report, Vocation, Transformation and Hope: a vision for the Church of England’s engagement with further education, fronted by the bishop of Winchester, Tim Dakin.

How is it that the “bishop for higher and further education” can produce a report that has so little to say about the realities of education and so much to say about how the church might increase its membership?

The report rather gives the game away by acknowledging that the aim of engaging with FE colleges is to “build a younger and more diverse church” and that “colleges can, especially, be a way to engage with what is often a missing generation… There is genuine potential here to help revitalise the local church in the long term.”

It appears the Church of England views FE colleges as a potential source of new recruits, rather than the pluralistic communities of learners and educators that they are.

The lord bishop of Durham confirmed this strategy, stating in the recent Queen’s Speech debate: “We as a church recognise that we must become younger and more diverse. Engaging in further education needs to be at the core of what we do.”

He added that the church is “committed to an ongoing working partnership with the secretary of state and the government to explore these issues together”.

The report laments the fact that, unlike HE, no Christian church now operates an FE institution, and suggests the establishment of a church “FE Colleges Group”.

Even more worryingly, this latest report follows a report published in 2020 called Faith in Higher Education – A Church of England vision, also under Bishop Dakin, which states that the church’s approach to further and higher education is theological, not educational.

That report declares that education and wisdom are achieved by “aligning all our ways – our thinking, acting, belonging – with those of God”.

Most strikingly, it adds “sustained theological attention is needed on the distinct questions of the content of any particular discipline

Most strikingly, it adds “sustained theological attention is needed on the distinct questions of the content of any particular discipline or field, the methodologies with which these are examined and interpreted, and the curriculum through which it is taught”.

In the 21st century, no educational institution should be subject to the constraints of theological doctrine.

One proposal being considered by the Church of England is that “each diocese should engage with further education and sixth-form colleges in its strategic planning and an appropriate member of the bishop’s staff should have responsibility for linking diocesan strategy with FE and sixth-form college activity”.

But fewer than one per cent of college students are members of their particular church. Meanwhile, governors of FE colleges are charged with developing an independent strategy for the benefit of all their students.

Another proposal in the report is to provide house-for-duty posts and to “reimagine chaplaincy provision”. This neglects the fact that FE colleges already have a cadre of professionally qualified and committed staff who work diligently to enhance the welfare and wellbeing of students of all backgrounds, abilities and aspirations.

Support for all students’ wellbeing is fundamental to the pluralistic life of our FE colleges and the communities they serve.

While, of course, most individual chaplains are well-intentioned, a “cuckoo-in-the-nest” chaplaincy whose first loyalty is towards a particular church would privilege a very small minority of staff and students. This would undermine every college’s purpose of building a community in which people of all faiths or none have equal opportunity.

The potential for conflict between the doctrinal beliefs of chaplains – for example, on same-sex marriage, other faiths or LGBT+ rights – and the inclusive support provided by the professional pastoral support teams in FE would also be ever present.

Support for further education from any source is, of course, to be welcomed, but the Church of England’s latest proposals have little to do with education and skills and much to do with reversing its own declining numbers amongst young people.

That’s why the specific proposals in this report must be resisted.



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply to Rev. David Campbell Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 Comments

  1. John Ricketts

    Church membership is in decline, and one can see why moves such as this are being proposed.

    There are loads of churches still open for business. It is surely up to church leadership to get people into them.

    John Ricketts
    Gloucestershire Humanists

  2. Mike Hill

    Of course what the CofE views and this repor,t failed to mention is that there are already 14 faith FE Colleges doing very well thank you in England and Wales and would you believe, able to function without the wild doctrinal beliefs of their chaplains and Principals. The ACVIC catholic colleges (the majority Outstanding) have been serving their communities, providing education to learners of all faiths or non – indeed the vast majority of students at these colleges are not catholic, for a number of decades. With a sensible, balanced approach and dialogue with all, we are able to function as Chruch/Order led institutions perfectly adapted to the 21st century

  3. John Dowdle

    As a retired College Lecturer, I am in full agreement with the authors of this article.
    One thing I always noticed with FE students was their enjoyment of the fact that they were treated like adults in FE Colleges, rather than as children still in school.
    What next: business-sponsored lecturers or political party sponsored lecturers?
    What is being proposed by these clerics represents a highly slippery slope which can only descend into our society becoming undermined to the point where our FE Colleges become just another offshoot of religious enterprises, similar to the situation in Iran.
    Keep religion out of our FE Colleges !!!

  4. Rev. David Campbell

    This rather thinly-argued article just further condemns the reality that our institutes of higher learning are only for people with “correct-think” (if I might borrow from Mr. Orwell’s language). Colleges 50-70 years ago were places where open discussions on life, religion, politics could be held – it is where young people hammered out their life’s direction. Now that they are largely held by strongly left-leaning individuals – many of whom demanded access to colleges in the past chanting “Freedom of Ideas” – The ones who demanded freedom of ideas now forbid freedom of ideas. Oh, how the mighty have fallen … to new lows of hypocrisy. People and groups who would dare challenge the LGBT and BLM or other movements are simply refused access. Oh, and forbid that anyone would speak who actually believed in God! Apparently, they do not want to have open discourse as many might come to realise that the Emperor has no new clothes on at all. Oh, the hypocrisy is mind-numbing. My hat is off to the CoE! Shame on you who would call yourselves educators! I am glad your lot was not running my university when I attended! I learned to disagree with people but listen to their views. I also converted to Christianity then as well as graduated with undergraduate and graduate degrees in mechanical engineering.

  5. John Reilly

    As a long-standing atheist (50 years) and ex-College Principal (11 years) I am wondering if Professor Higgins and Mr Sharpe are concerned “only” by the influence of Christian churches on FE colleges? Perhaps they could comment?