David Way, chief operating officer, National Apprenticeship Service

At 22, David Way found himself at a crossroads. Having recently completed a Masters degree, he had two job offers on the table – a graduate traineeship at the Department for Employment and an industrial relations role at an engineering firm in Peterborough.

He went for the former, he says – somewhat sheepishly – on the basis that he was far more interested in “making a difference to peoples’ lives” than helping turn out diesel engines. While quick to add that engineering can make a difference to peoples’ lives (something he will be sure to stress to the manufacturing summit he’s speaking at later this month, he jokes), he has never regretted his decision.

It started him on a path that has included senior jobs in the Department for Employment, the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) and the National Apprenticeship Service (NAS), where he is Chief Operating Officer.

The common thread running through his career is about helping people achieve their potential. What continues to drives him, he says, is the “belief that everyone has got some sort of creativity or talent that sometimes needs nurturing…” – something he learned early on in his own education.

Raised in the market town of Bridgwater in Somerset, Way came “top of everything” in primary school and flew through the 11 plus examination.

But grammar school took some getting used to. Conscious of being the first in his family to have any experience of “homework or exams,” (his parents were both factory workers with no formal qualifications), Way’s confidence – and his academic performance – began to wane.

“I just lost my way for a while,” he recalls. “It took me quite a few years to find my feet, and what I remember vividly was that one teacher taking a bit of interest in me…and suddenly I blossomed again.”

Having rediscovered his passion for learning, Way went on to study Economics and Technology at City University, followed by an MA in Industrial Relations at the London School of Economics (LSE).

To me, the key to irreversible growth of apprenticeships is quality.”

Within months of joining the Department for Employment, he was running a job centre in Bognor Regis. Five years on, he was strategy director at the Employment Service.

In 1990, following the end of his first marriage, Way decided to relocate to Wales, where he ran the employment service and became involved with a project helping Romania, which was just emerging from a communist regime – and experiencing high levels of unemployment as a result – to develop a business sector.

Seeing how another country coped with unemployment – and sharing his expertise about how it might be done better, was both fascinating and humbling, he says. “They [the job centre employees] opened the doors at 9am and people formed a queue. And at 6pm they closed the door and people just left.

There was no systematic approach to helping people and so to be able to tell them how they might be able to cope…and sharing that learning with fellow human beings who are in a less fortunate situation that yourselves… that was great.”

In 1998, Way relocated to the West Midlands, as director for the Department for Trade and Industry (DTI) where, two years later, he found himself involved in another high profile project.

As part of the Rover taskforce – which had the mission of saving the British car manufacturer from collapse – he found his life “being played out on the Today programme” every morning.

“I would get up, the news was about what we were doing, go to the meeting, eat bacon rolls…discuss and negotiate what the funding package might look like and how that would be spent,” he recalls. “You wouldn’t want to be dealing with the collapse of a big company like that but it was of such importance to the region and to be involved in it was really energising. But just very surreal, dealing with the main item on the news every day.”

An increasing desire to get closer to “real employers, real people and make a real difference” led him to join the Learning and Skills Council in 2001, as executive director for the Black Country where he faced the challenge of raising education standards and investment in training in an area characterized at the time by “poverty and lack of aspirations.”

Way – who was awarded a CBE for his work with young people last year – admits he is often close to tears at learners’ awards ceremonies.

One memory that sticks in his mind, is presenting a certificate to a checkout operator – a woman in her 30s – at a local supermarket. “I gave her this certificate for training and it was the first certificate she had ever had in her life and she broke down in tears because she was so proud of what she had achieved.”

The episode took him back to his own experience as a teenager, and the teacher who took him under his wing and helped him find his way again. “If you take an interest in someone, encourage and support them, find the things they are good at…who knows what they are capable of?” he says.

If his 35 years in employment and skills have taught him one thing, it is that “small steps” can lead to big gains. People can feel “overwhelmed and intimidated” by too much learning, especially if it means changes to their lifestyle.

The most effective way of reaching people is to take learning to them “in the local community or village hall” or find role models who can do it for you, he says.

His work with NAS has deepened his belief in the power of passing on knowledge and skills. But the last six months – when The National Apprenticeship Service has repeatedly come under fire for its role in funding and co-ordinating short, low-skill apprenticeships – have not been easy.

While he has felt at times that there was a need to balance the negative media coverage, a need for “another side” to be heard, the experience has taught him not to be too defensive, he says.

He admits that the NAS was not used to facing criticism but says that while “passionate about getting it right,” perfection just isn’t realistic. “I think we have learnt that what we absolutely need to do is to recognise that if you are delivering apprenticeships through 1,000 providers with 400,000 apprentices at any one time, not every single one of those experiences or those transactions is going to be 100%.”

But he is keen to stress that the NAS is keen to listen and that, having been in existence for just three years, there is still a lot to learn.

“What I really think we are trying to achieve is sort of critical mass of high-quality apprenticeships, so that there will be no possibility that in the future people will look back at 2012 and say that was the high water point.

To me, the key to irreversible growth of apprenticeships is quality. If we get half a million young people who had such a great experience of apprenticeships, they want it for their friends and their children, and employers want it for other employees…then we’ll have really achieved something.”

 

Apprenticeships: a little bit of advice

It’s a mess.  Anyone who thinks the current or proposed system for providing information advice and guidance (IAG) to young people is fit for purpose is either a fool or a knave.

Ask young people!! Or ask Lord Browne whose report provided the basis of the new tuition fees regime and had a remarkable amount to say on this.

Contrast Alison Wolf who avoided the subject entirely in her report on vocational education,  although in conversation did say “don’t take me there” when asked what she would be saying about IAG in her report.

Schools get a real hammering when it comes to advice and guidance. Research by the Sutton Trust shows that half of young people consider the advice and guidance that they received before making choices to be inadequate. Other reports have highlighted that careers professionals have a low status within schools; they lack understanding of the range of options available to pupils and do not have enough time to advise them in depth.

I challenged a large group of advisors at a conference last year to identify which degree subjects had the lowest rate of employment after six months and not one knew the answer.

My particular concern is the way that vocational pathways, and apprenticeships in particular are simply not getting across as schools intensify their obsession with academic league tables”

Back to Browne, he said: “Students need access to high quality information, advice and guidance in order to make the best choices. Improvements are needed.

Providing students with clearer information about employment outcomes will close the gap between the skills taught by the higher education system and what employers need.  Institutions have a responsibility to help students make the right choices as well.

“Every school will be required to make individualised careers advice available to its pupils. The advice will be delivered by certified professionals who are well informed, benefit from continued training and professional development and whose status in schools is respected and valued.”

What evidence do we have that this is going to happen?  I have direct experience of what is happening across a range of schools and it isn’t pretty.

I also see some rather questionable operators seeking a commercial opportunity by offering IAG services into schools.

My particular concern is the way that vocational pathways, and apprenticeships in particular are simply not getting across as schools intensify their obsession with academic league tables, and as we all know, make life very hard for those who wish to present their pupils with alternatives to university.

It is time that the post-16 providers – both FE and private –  and accreditation bodies worked together to provide an advisory and guidance service that ensures that young people hear the message about quality vocational pathways.

And if they can’t talk to the schools, they should talk over the schools direct to young people, using social media and all the other communications platforms that, for example, the National Apprenticeship Service (NAS) seems incapable of exploiting.

We know that talking directly to young people works if you use their channels and their language.

The success of notgoingtouni is directly attributable to this mastery of the media and this approach provides a roadmap for providing IAG.

A sequential combination of online information, moderated guidance through online careers-oriented forums, and direct one-to-one support through mentoring – online or face to face – would undoubtedly be successful.

Is anyone listening?

Peter Cobrin is National Education Director for www.notgoingtouni.co.uk

 

Innovative curriculum helps progression to apprenticeships

The chance to develop vital skills and experience before starting an Apprenticeship can give would be apprentices a real head start.

The National Apprenticeship’s Access to Apprenticeship programme and the Sector Skills Council’s Pre Apprenticeship developments highlight the importance of preparing learners for their Apprenticeship.

‘NCFE Progression to Apprenticeship’ qualifications can be delivered to support learners and help equip them to make the most of their Apprenticeship right from the start.

By preparing learners before they start a full Apprenticeship, they’re more confident and better prepared for their chosen Apprenticeship study route.

The NCFE qualification in Learning to Learn is one of the Progression to Apprenticeship routes we offer.  However, becoming skilled in the art of learning is certainly a controversial idea which can divide opinion in the education sector.

Is it truly necessary to acquire a capacity to learn; an ability that is seen as innate and instinctive? Or alternatively, does the skill of learning need cultivating?

Surely equipping people with the personal and study skills they need to get the most out of their learning experience can only be a positive thing?

At NCFE, we believe that an individual’s “learning muscles” can indeed be exercised and expanded to enhance achievement. That’s why we worked with Gateshead College to develop the NCFE Level 1 and 2 Awards in Learning to Learn.

Our Learning to Learn qualifications help new students master the essential skills they need for their learner journey; gain confidence by achieving a qualification at an early stage of their studies; experience a high quality standard induction to help them become a more effective and motivated learner and most importantly, reach their full potential.

Learning to Learn also offers an excellent opportunity for would-be apprentices to prepare for learning in the workplace.

The qualifications can also be delivered alongside other Progression to Apprenticeships qualifications such as our Occupational Studies suite, Developing Effective Thinking Skills and Employability Skills, to support young people to get the most out of their chosen study route. Having developed a wide, transferable skills base, apprentices will begin their Apprenticeship more confident and better prepared.

Overall, we believe that more effective learning really can be taught! Improving a young person’s learning prowess promotes engagement, provides individualised support and raises success and achievement.

Learners become prepared for their main course of study and any shortfall in learning can be addressed at an early stage. No learner comes to college as the finished article, so therefore we need to do all we can to ensure their learning experience is a positive one.

Whether it’s to support Access to Apprenticeship programmes or any other Apprenticeship pathway offer, we recognise that there’s no ‘one size fits all’.

We work flexibly with you to develop your own NCFE Progression to Apprenticeship package so that you can support your learners in the way you feel best.

David Grailey is chief executive of NCFE [advertisement]

 

Apprenticeships are in need of innovation

The government’s commitment to promoting and funding more Apprenticeships has been welcomed by those who are working hard to tackle youth unemployment.

Skills minister John Hayes set out his vision for Apprenticeships, saying that by increasing routes to learning we could “seed opportunities for thousands of Britons and build the economically successful and socially just nation we crave”.

We applaud this vision – but to achieve it, all of us involved in delivering skills and training to young people now need to play our part and think innovatively about how to integrate employment and skills.

Recent reports suggesting that Apprenticeships are not being taken up by the under 25s and those out of work are concerning. And it’s self-evident that to optimise the value of Apprenticeships in addressing the unprecedented challenge presented by youth unemployment, training provision must recognise and respond to the needs of young, unemployed people.

Last year, the government implemented the biggest change to the welfare to work sector in ten years, providing a single, personalised structure for all customer groups and superseding the complicated raft of national programmes previously on offer.

As a provider of the government’s Work Programme, it is also clear to us at Working Links that organisations such as ourselves are in the perfect position to help the youngest benefit claimants prepare for and secure Apprenticeships, ensuring that coveted apprentice slots are going to those who need them most – young people without jobs.

Just after Work Programme launched, we commissioned and published the results of research into employer and young person attitudes towards Apprenticeships. Our results showed that the vast majority of young people were worried about their job prospects. The research also revealed four out of five employers believed that Apprenticeships would help reduce youth unemployment and that an overwhelming number of employers felt that an Apprenticeship gave young people the skills they need to find lasting work.

More controversially, traditional views regarding the skills that employers look for when hiring young people were challenged by the report. Of the employers surveyed, 86 per cent said they look for potential rather than experience when hiring young people and cited soft skills such as ‘a good attitude’ and ‘enthusiasm and motivation’ as key qualities in a potential work ready candidate.

Careers advice was also called into question. The young people surveyed felt that they are not getting enough advice from schools about vocational qualifications such as Apprenticeships – only 24 per cent of young people were given advice on Apprenticeships, while 70 per cent received information about college courses.

It’s clear that both employers and the government see Apprenticeships as crucial to reducing youth unemployment and recognise the positive impact these schemes have on society. We’re working with the government to help realise this vision and help young people into a future of sustainable employment. An integration of the Apprenticeships and the Work Programme will not only help ensure better life chances for the young unemployed, but will further improve the service offered by the Work Programme to young people.

We’re already trialling a project in the South West of England to do just that – a pilot programme that is helping young people who are unemployed to gain the valuable pre-employment skills they need to successfully enter into an Apprenticeship. The pilot is up and running in Plymouth and is about to roll out across the region.

Working Links will share the learning from the pilot with government, employers and other key stakeholders to help develop a workable, nationwide programme that successfully integrates Apprenticeships, the Work Programme and the needs of employers, large and small.

 As we pause to evaluate the importance of Apprenticeships in National Apprenticeship Week, we must remember that collaborative working really is key to achieving the government’s vision of securing a better future for the next generation.

Mike Lee, Director, Skills and Young People at Working Links

 

How do we incentivise the employers?

The key word is already in Apprenticeships.

We need to be doing more to ‘entice’ SMEs and other employers to take on Apprentices and even more importantly, offer real Apprenticeships that are based on ‘real’ jobs.

In our submission to the BIS Inquiry on Apprenticeships we will be emphasising a number of key points.

Firstly we welcome any growth in the numbers of 16 to 18 year old Apprenticeships, particularly in the current climate, but we would like to see as great a focus on the 19 to 24 year olds who are struggling to find employment or training opportunities.

Secondly, we need to see more evidence of recruiting apprentices to ‘real’ jobs. A number of training providers need to show more evidence of job outcomes; it is simply not good enough that in the past some apprentices have been recruited for seasonal work and short employment contracts.

We support the employer ownership agenda; employers need to be taking greater responsibility for investment in training if they want to meet their own skills needs.

However, at the same time, government needs to work harder to push the right messages to employers and to reduce bureaucracy as much as possible to incentivise co-operation.

we believe a rebate on tax or National Insurance would work better than a cash payment.”

There should be a bigger drive and push to convince SMEs of the value and ROI of taking on apprentices but we believe NAS’ Apprenticeship Week will be doing just that and we look forward to the media coverage.

Last but not least there needs to be more clarity on what does and does not constitute a 50 per cent contribution for 19 to 24 year old Apprenticeships as this is being interpreted differently by every provider.

Some financial incentives for employers might help, but in this difficult economic time we believe a rebate on tax or National Insurance would work better than a cash payment.

All in all we feel that NAS was started up with good intentions, but has a stretch to do to improve on quality, position Apprenticeships strongly in the market place and convince employers of the true worth and value of apprentices.

Lynne Sedgmore is Executive Director for the 157 Group

The National Audit Office passes judgement on adult apprenticeships

The National Audit Office (NAO) has published its ‘Adult Apprenticeships’ report today, which looks into “whether the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) is obtaining value for money from the Apprenticeships programme”.

FE Week took a look at some of the key findings in the NAO report.

Value for money

Adult apprenticeships offer good value for money, but the government needs to focus its resources on industries which offer the best economic returns, the NAO claims.

The independent body says the BIS needs to “set its sights higher” on the apprenticeship programme, despite exceeding all previous expansion targets.

Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, said: “The apprenticeships programme has been providing a good return for public spending.

“Nevertheless, the Department should set its sights higher in order to get better value from the £0.5 billion and rising now spent on adult apprenticeships each year.”

The apprenticeship programme has increased by 140 per cent during the last five years, of which 68 per cent were learners aged 25 or above.

Previous recruitment targets set by government were smashed, at least in part, by the 182,100 new adult apprenticeship starts in 2010/11.

The NAO report criticised both BIS and the National Apprenticeship Service (NAS) for not targeting the qualifications, frameworks or age groups which will have the biggest impact on the economy.

The report states: “The Department needs robust evidence to identify which qualifications are having most impact and where the additionality delivered against public funding is greatest.

“The Department should use this information to decide where to target its resources. It has recently announced its intention to do so, though has yet to publish details.”

It later adds: “It has recently announced its intention to do so, though has yet to publish details.”

More than 80 per cent of the total  expansion in apprenticeships between 2006/07 and 2010/11 was covered by 10 occupations, with health and social care, customer service and retail coming out on top.

Meanwhile, engineering apprenticeships contributed just 2 per cent to the five year growth across all age groups.

Funding rates unreliable

The funding rates used to pay training providers for delivering an apprenticeship is not based on robust information, according to the NAO.

The NAO says the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) and NAS have set tariffs without “reliable evidence” to support estimated training costs.

The ‘Adult Apprenticeships’ report states: “The Agency and the Service currently set tariffs without sufficiently robust information on the cost of provision.

“This may mean that some frameworks have become more financially attractive to offer than others.”

The NAO say both the SFA and NAS are unable to judge the extent to which providers may be generating significant profits or losses as a result of inaccurate  rates.

Skewed funding rates on individual frameworks has led to some employers not paying the expected contributions towards training providers’ costs.

The report states: “Employers pay apprentices’ wages and deliver on-the-job training, but some are not paying the expected contributions towards training providers’ costs.

“Employers are required to contribute towards the cost of adult apprenticeships, and the funding rates paid to providers assume employers contribute at least half of the training costs, either in cash or ‘in kind’.

“However, evidence suggests that some employers do not pay the required contributions.”

The report references a survey, conducted in 2009, which found that 43 per cent of providers choose not to collect fees from employers.

“With full contributions from employers, government funding could deliver more or higher quality apprenticeships for the same cost,” the report states.

Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, said: “It [BIS] needs to target resources more effectively; confirm the training provided is in addition to what would have been provided without public support; and make sure that the funding system is informed by robust information on the cost of delivery.”

The unknown level of ‘dead-weight’

The value of adult apprenticeships is being exposed to significant dead-weight, according to the NAO.

The NAO says “optimistic” figures produced by the BIS assume all of the training delivered by apprenticeships would not have occurred without public support.

The criticism follows statistics by BIS, reported in March 2011, which estimate that adult apprenticeships deliver a return of roughly £28 for every £1 of public spending.

The NAO says the programme produces a return closer to £18 when considering all levels of an apprenticeship.

“The difference between our figures and those of the Department reflects the sensitivity of the calculations to the underlying assumptions, in particular our respective assessments of the available evidence on the potential wider impact of the training on the productivity of the workforce,” the report states.

The NAO says BIS has failed to assess the level of additionality (the extent to which public funding results in training that would “not otherwise have occurred) being delivered by the apprenticeship programme.

The report states: “The Department assumes that, for economic returns to apprenticeships, all public funding achieves additionality, but lacks data to support this; therefore any reduction in additionality would result in an equivalent reduction in the economic returns.”

The NAO says BIS has an evaluation in progress which will help them to measure the additionality of the apprenticeship programme, with results available in early 2012.

One in five adult apprenticeships lasted less than six months

A growing number of adult apprenticeships are being delivered in under half a year, the NAO has revealed.

The report says 34,600 apprenticeships were delivered by providers in less than six months in 2010/11, making up nearly a fifth of completions for learners aged 25 and above.

A further 6,200 ( three per cent of adult completions) were found to be less than three months long.

The NAO says the rapid expansion of the apprenticeship programme “presents risks that need to be managed.”

“In four of the top ten fastest-expanding subjects around a quarter or more apprentices completed in six months or less (2010/11),” the report states.

“In one of the fastest-growing subjects, IT and telecoms professionals, over two-thirds (68 per cent) completed in under six months.”

The SFA and NAS are currently investigating 87 providers thought to be delivering ‘short duration’ apprenticeships and have said they will be checking to see if providers are complying with their contractual obligations, and will close down provision if necessary.

“The growth in shorter-duration apprenticeships may reflect increasing take-up of frameworks which require less training, and growing numbers of over-25s, who may be allowed to complete more quickly owing to their prior experience,” the NAO report states.

The NAO report also reveals that the BIS hopes to publish revised data on the length of apprenticeships in February 2012.

The empowering role of apprenticeships

Despite a lot of media coverage of apprenticeships in the last year, not enough has been heard from the apprentices themselves. We know that the Government and employers invest in the apprenticeship programme and that they get a healthy return on their investment. Apprentices also make an investment so it is worth reflecting on the ‘return’ for them.

Last year we carried out a survey of 81 people from across the country, aged 17 to 61, who had been nominated for the Adult Learners’ Week Adult Apprentice of the Year Award, sponsored by Pearson. The results were incredible and show just how worthwhile the increased investment in apprenticeships is for all sorts of people at all stages of their lives.

 For many, the experience has truly transformed their lives: “Doing the apprenticeship has changed my life. I am much more focussed. I am doing a real job in a real workplace gaining the most brilliant experience.” Underlying this is the sense that it has given them a fresh start and has helped them prove to themselves and to others that they are not a failure. “I feel that as a middle-aged woman what I have achieved is remarkable. My journey has not finished – it has only just begun.”

 With FE Loans, the learner/apprentice will be the purchaser, will feel able to shop around, will look for the best offer. Will this be empowering?”

Even more than this, the impact reaches forward into future learning, personal development and family life.  “I am so sorted now, feeling much more positive about myself and my family are more relaxed around me and are proud of me.”

If they are that good then making the case for more investment must be easy and it certainly looks positive with the very welcome and large increase in Government investment. From 2013, those over the age of 24 will need to take out a loan for their apprenticeship and there is a lot of understandable concern about the impact this will have on fairness and equality (see NIACE Adults’ Learning extra January 2012) but perhaps too little thinking about the potential positives.

 Our survey of adult apprentices not only gave evidence of the benefits, it also taught us how important it is to listen to the learner experience. Our respondents had ideas about how to improve quality, how to advise potential apprentices, what worked for them and what might work better for others. In the best examples, learners felt empowered at work, at home and in their communities.

With FE Loans, the learner/apprentice will be the purchaser, will feel able to shop around, will look for the best offer. Will this be empowering?

Will people with the right advice and guidance, with better public information, be able to demand a better quality offer? Will this result in a more personalised learning experience, with curriculum and delivery designed to meet their needs? Will people demand a more blended offer, with more use of technology and distance learning? Any provider of training who can tap into this demand will surely be more successful, just like in any other market-place?

So, here at NIACE we are keen to do more work to capture the apprentice voice, to help empower learners to get more of what they need and to support people to get the best possible information, advice and guidance to be able to be informed customers. It will be fascinating to see if the introduction of FE Loans helps accelerate this.

The final words should go to an apprentice:  “If it wasn’t for my apprenticeship I would still be stuck in a rut with no direction to walk in. Now I have this qualification I feel a new person with limitless possibilities and it has given me back the drive to learn to further myself in my career. I owe my whole career down to one qualification – thank you!”

David Hughes is the CEO of the National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE)

 

FE Week’s Apprenticeship Week Supplement

 

Inside our supplement you will find comments from industry experts such as Lynne Sedgmore, executive director of the 157 Group, Graham Hoyle, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) and David Hughes, chief executive of the National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE). And that’s not all, we’ve produced a huge technical feature with analysis from today’s publication of the latest Statistical First Release (SFR) data.

So there’s plenty to get stuck into. Throughout next week, make sure you stay up to date with National Apprenticeships Week by following the hash tag #NAW2012 on Twitter or by following @feweek online.

Download a Hi Res version of the supplement: Click here (25mb)

Download a Low Res version of the supplement: Click here (4mb)

You can also read and comment on individual articles online:

Safeguarding the definition of apprenticeships ~ Graham Hoyle, CEO at AELP

How do we incentivise the employers? ~ Lynne Sedgemore, Executive Director at 157 Group

The empowering role of apprenticeships ~ David Hughes, CEO of NIACE

Apprenticeships are in need of innovation ~ Mike Lee, Director, Skills and Young People at Working Links

Apprenticeships: a little bit of advice ~ Peter Cobrin, National Education Director for www.notgoingtouni.co.uk

Innovative curriculum helps progression to apprenticeships ~ David Graily, CEO of NCFE

Interview with David Way ~ Chief Operating Officer of NAS

Interview with Ross Varnam ~ Autobody repair apprentice and WorldSkills silver medalist

FE Week’s Apprenticeship Week Event Calendar

FE Week’s analysis of the latest apprenticeship figures for England

Apprenticeship Week, get involved on twitter

Safeguarding the definition of apprenticeships

The debate around apprenticeships over the last few months, which has now prompted a Commons select committee inquiry, was originally sparked by FE Week’s coverage of ‘short-course’ apprenticeships and we know that the publication is able to talk knowledgably about the subject, even if we may not always agree with its opinions.

However I cannot extend the same compliment to some of the other comment which I have seen on the matter.

First and foremost some observers seem to hold a traditional and therefore inaccurate view of what an apprenticeship actually is.

That is why the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP), which represents providers who deliver over 70 per cent of apprenticeships in England, is using its submission to the select committee to firstly secure a clear, universal definition of an apprenticeship.  We set out our proposed definition in our well-received position paper to ministers last autumn, namely:

“An apprenticeship is a competence based skill development programme, designed and endorsed by employers for their employees, which combines independently accredited work based learning, off-the-job training and relevant experience in the job.”

This definition implies an acceptance, as allowed since Modern Apprenticeships were introduced in 1994, that apprenticeships can be for employees of any age in response to employers’ needs although we fully understand current policy prioritising towards young people.

It means therefore that it is incorrect to simply think of apprenticeships as a means of job creation for young people.

Protecting the brand

We support the coalition government’s ambitions to see more apprentices complete at levels 3 and 4.

However, all levels of apprenticeships offer high quality training which brings extensive benefits to both the employer and the apprentice.

Whilst we would encourage progression to level 3 apprenticeships wherever possible, it must be recognised that in many occupations and sectors a level 2 apprenticeship is the most appropriate level of qualification, offering the right quality, skills, knowledge and benefits to the apprentices and their employers.

Opinion-formers and policymakers in their well-meaning attempts to defend the apprenticeship ‘brand’ would be in our view misguided if they sought to deny a valued qualification that employers ultimately own and protect.

This is not to say that employers have or should have free rein to call any type of workforce training an apprenticeship when public money is involved.

Proper apprenticeships should be subject to the same audit scrutiny, Ofsted inspection regimes and SASE compliance with the sector skills council playing an important role as custodians of standards.

This is very pertinent to the current pilot being proposed for the ‘Employer Ownership of Skills Development’ where apprenticeships may well feature in some of the employer bids.

Our select committee submission refers to previous AELP proposals on how apprenticeships should be funded by the state, employers and learners, bearing in mind that loans are on the horizon.

With the government announcement that apprenticeships for 16-18 year olds must last a full 12 months and the additional costs of Functional Skills to be added, it is unfortunate that the funding rate for this age group has been cut by 2per cent. Quality provision comes at a cost.

At a time when the government is trying to grow the number of young people starting apprenticeships, this rate cut will surely create a tension between increasing volumes and maintaining quality.

Role of the NAS

National Apprenticeship Week comes under the remit of the National Apprenticeship Service (NAS) and we support the marketing initiatives that the agency is undertaking to promote the programme to employers, particularly those to raise awareness among SMEs.

The National Careers Service may be coming on stream in April but AELP believes that NAS can play a particularly valuable role in schools, explaining to young people, their teachers and parents that apprenticeships offer a high quality vocational training that will suit many young people better than the traditional academic route after the age of 16.

With success rates at 74 per cent, and rising, our apprenticeships are something we should be proud of and celebrate.

Graham Hoyle is the CEO of the Association of Empoyment and Learning Providers (AELP)