Skills Minister John Hayes meets Jaguar Land Rover apprentices

John Hayes visited Jaguar and Landrover apprentices as part of the ‘See Inside Manufacturing’ initiative earlier this week.

The Minister of State for Further Education, Skills and Lifelong Learning visited Halewood Operations to meet some of the company’s first qualified apprentices.

Mr Hayes said: “By inspiring and training the new generation of highly skilled technicians we need to fuel growth and build prosperity, Jaguar Land Rover is setting a fine example to British business.

“To help more firms open their doors to our young people, the Government is funding the biggest and best apprenticeships programme our country has ever seen.”

John Hayes was given a tour of production lines that included the Evoque, a new car which has allowed the company to hire 1,500 new employees.

Richard Else, Operations Director at Jaguar Land Rover, Halewood, said: “The automotive industry has a critical role to play in supporting a manufacturing led economic recovery. Our business is experiencing a period of growth thanks to investment and innovation and we need to ensure that we have the next generation of engineers lined up to carry us forward.”

Mr Else added: “Initiatives such as ‘See Inside Manufacturing’, will help us to get the message out that manufacturing is an exciting industry, excellent career choice, with high quality training and a bright future.”

Mr. Hayes also visited the Land Rover Experience Centre and Jaguar Land Rover Education Business Centre, meeting more than 30 local school children who were visiting the company.

‘See Inside Manufacturing’ is a collaborative initative designed to promote British manufacturing and dispel the myth that companies no longer ‘make anything’.

Free meals for hard-hit students at Newham College

Denise Brown-Sackey, Principal of Newham College

Newham College is giving out around 1,500 free meals to students each week in a bid to tackle cuts in government grants.

Managers have said that hundreds of learners would be unable to study at the college if they were not given luncheon vouchers.

Denise Brown-Sackey, Principal of Newham College, said: “The lunch is making a big difference. We want east Londoners to take part in a learning revolution and it’s one of our options to help young people in difficult financial times.

“We’ve put a lot of thought into the nutritional balance of the food and I’m pleased that to date we’ve provided over 5,000 meals to our young students.”

The scheme was implemented in September following an Association of Colleges (AoC) survey that blamed the scrapping of Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) for a drop in student numbers.

The meals, which benefit more than 1,000 students,  are available to all learners under 18-years-old and to under 16s using the College for part of their school work.

Hundreds of 12 week apprenticeships advertised on NAS website are ‘under review’

The apprenticeship programmes delivered by the hotelier De Vere are under review and “likely to change” as part of an assessment into provision and standards.

The National Apprenticeship Service (NAS) is looking into every short apprenticeship, alongside the Skills Funding Agency (SFA), following the introduction of Specification of Apprenticeship Standards for England (SASE).

However, news of the review into De Vere follows an investigation by FE Week into programmes on NAS’ vacancy site.

More than 700 De Vere vacancies of either 12 week (customer service) or 16 week (professional cookery) are currently available to view online, taking place at a number of nationwide De Vere Academies.

The De Vere Academy of Hospitality advert says they aim “to inspire and create talented hospitality industry stars of the future through the provision of work-based learning.”

It is “open to those aged 16-24 years and no previous experience or academic qualifications are required” and pays £104 per week (the minimum apprenticeship wage) for a 40 hour week over five days.

While acknowledging that programmes delivered by De Vere do not meet the requirements of SASE, the National Apprenticeship Service say they do provide “appropriate and valuable provision for young people” who want to work in the hospitality sector.

A statement from NAS, issued to FE Week this morning (Friday), said: “We have already indicated to De Vere that their programme does not meet the comprehensive standards for apprenticeship programmes.

“However, we believe their programme provides appropriate and valuable provision for young people who want to work in the sector.”

It also added: “We intend to work with De Vere and the Sector Skills Council for the hospitality sector, People 1st, to develop a tailored ‘Access to Apprenticeship’ pathway designed to meet the specific needs of employers in the sector that will offer a high quality opportunity to young people wanting to work in the sector.

“While we work together to identify an alternative source of funding we will continue to support De Vere and the young people and employers involved in the programme.

“All live De Vere vacancies posted on the apprenticeship vacancy site will indicate that the provision is under review and is likely to change.”

At the time of going to press, the reference to “under review and likely to change” could not be found.

The SASE was published in January, which is when NAS and SFA began their review.

It was also followed by the publication of the Statement on the Quality of Apprenticeship Delivery Models by NAS in August (click here).

The statement said the review will “closely consider the circumstances of each programme with the college or training provider” which will help them “fully understand the delivery model and make a judgement on whether provision meets the comprehensive standards” which have been established for apprenticeships.

It added: “These standards include SASE, the requirements of the Apprenticeship Framework approved by the relevant Issuing Authority, the Quality of Apprenticeships Delivery Model and the Funding Requirements.

“It is anticipated that through this review we will determine some provision, while not meeting these standards, still provides appropriate and valuable training for young people who would otherwise not be in education, training or employment.”

However, NAS has warned that it will remove funding from providers which fail to meet the required standard.

The statement continued: “We will work with the providers and employers of such provision, and where appropriate with the YPLA and SFA, to secure suitable alternative funding where that is appropriate.

“Throughout the review, our priority will be to remove apprenticeship funding from provision which fails to meet the required standard, while maintaining provision that supports young people into employment or training, as well as giving them the opportunity to progress onto an apprenticeship programme.”

FE Week approached De Vere on Tuesday and is awaiting a response.

Employers use apprentices for ‘cheap labour’

Colleges and training providers say employers should pay towards apprentice training programmes.

A survey conducted by Lsect asked if employers should continue to be allowed to contribute nothing towards the training for their apprentices.

Nearly three quarters of the people who replied – 73 per cent – said the employer should pay something towards training their employees.

Fiona Davis, funding and registry manager at Boston College, said: “Some employers are seen as using apprentices for cheap labour and this will only increase if the employer no longer has to make a financial contribution to the training.”

She said that a small contribution from the employee may make them more likely to complete a course, but if the apprentice is on minimum wage to expect them to fund the apprenticeship is unaffordable.

Funding for apprenticeship training has been a source of controversy following the government’s further education reform programme.

The employer is expected to make a 50 per cent contribution to the fees but they are currently allowed to make no contribution at all.

This means that in some cases the learner will be expected to fund their own training.

Apprentices over the age of 24 are going to be charged for studying their first level 3 qualification and loans will be offered to those who cannot afford to pay fees upfront.

The maximum loan that can be taken for studying is £4,000 but there is no limit to what colleges can charge for the qualifications.

Attempt to ‘simplify’ funding may prove barrier to FE loans

A consultation on proposals for a further education loans system is set to close today (October 21).

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) has said the proposals, which would charge apprentices and adult learners at Level 3 and above up to £4,000, will “be determined in a simple and straightforward way”.

The maximum loan amount available for each course would be decided by a new set of simplified funding rates, which are due to be fully implemented by the Skills Funding Agency in 2013/14.

However, a survey conducted by Lsect has shown that the sector is concerned that the proposals will in fact complicate funding for learners aged 19 and above.

In one hour there were 35 responses to the online survey, of which 60 per cent said they thought simplification would not be achieved.

In comparison less than 9 per cent said they thought the changes would make funding easier.

Arthur Smith, MIS Manager at Stafford College, said: “Every time anyone has simplified anything in FE things have only got more complex. For 15 years the bureaucratic burden has been talked about with a view to reducing it… and nothing but extra work for less funding has been achieved.”

Some respondents said a simplified model could never be suitable for managing adult funding.

Philip Smith, User Support & Reporting Coordinator at Leicester College, said: “Effective funding methodologies can’t be simple, especially for 19+ funding. What they need to be is clear and understandable.”

Martin Kennedy, Office Supervisor at Truro & Penwith College Business Centre, added: “Changes in funding always end up more complex, as they go through several drafts and the last one rarely bears any resemblance to the first.  Just look at the appalling chaos of the Specification for Apprenticeship Standards in England (SASE) and the number of missed deadlines and confusion that still surrounds it.”

Tim Porter, 16 – 24 LLDD Commissioning Support Officer at Somerset County Council, added: “I think there are too many organisations with vested interests for this to ever be fully achieved.”

Others said that the funding rates could end up being too simple and damage the success of the loans system.

Donald Lush, Manager at the Harington Scheme, said:  “I think that it’s high risk.  My view of the proposed simplification (so far) is that it is oversimplified and may need to be revisited because of the unintended consequences of this.”

You can respond to the Lsect survey via SurveyMonkey here: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/FE-loans

FE Week will be publishing the results of the consultation as they become available.

Responses to the BIS consultation can be made addressed to Andrew King via email (feloans@bis.gsi.gov.uk) by the end of today. You may also wish to leave a comment on the FE Week website below.

Number of adult apprenticeships expected to more than triple

The number of apprenticephip starts aged 25 and above is expected to soar in the latest Statistical First Release (SFR) due next Thursday.

Based on the June 2011 SFR, if the same number of starts in February to April 2010 are repeated in May to July 2011, more than 50,000 will have started taking the full year figure to over 170,000.

Nick Linford, Managing Director of Lsect and Managing Editor of FE Week, said: “I’m expecting the 25+ apprenticeship starts figure for 2010/11 to exceed 170,000, which would represent a more than tripling of the 49,100 starts in 2010/11.

“Given an increase in adult apprenticeships of this magnitued was uplanned, and that many of these learners will have already been in employment, it is inevitable that the Government will have tough questions to answer about value for money.”

The final quarter figures, when published on Thursday, will add to the the record 326,700 new apprenticeship starts that were reported between August 2010 and April 2011 in the June 2011 SFR (click here)

As a means of chasing government targets for expansion of apprenticeships, 25+ provision makes perfect sense.  In every other respect it is probably not a good idea and dilutes an already ‘confused’
apprenticeship brand/offer.”

Professor Ewart Keep, from Cardiff University, said that the figures will likely show a dilution in the apprenticeship brand.

“Post-25 age apprenticeships, in almost every other country, would be regarded as adult training/re-training, not as apprenticeships, as this term/form of training is restricted to initial Vocational Education Training,” he said.

“As a means of chasing government targets for expansion of apprenticeships, 25+ provision makes perfect sense.  In every other respect it is probably not a good idea and dilutes an already ‘confused’ apprenticeship brand/offer.  I have no problem with offering training/re-training to the post-25 age group, but it isn’t really an apprenticeship in any meaningful sense.”

The expected rise in adult apprenticeships has been attributed, in part, to the increasing number of training schemes being run at supermarkets.

In June, FE Week reported that Morrisons have started over 18,000 25+ Level 2 retail apprenticeships in 2010/11, nearly all of which are taken up by existing employees (click here).

Julian Bailey, Head of Media Relations at Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc, said: “We think apprenticeships are important for new and existing staff as a way of developing and enhancing skills.”

We have not been able to agree at this time any additional funding for new 25+ Apprenticeship starts.”

FE Week and The Mail on Sunday has also reported on Asda (click here), who plan to deliver 25,000 new apprenticeships to existing employees only.

Many of these employees are expected to be above the age of 25.

A wholly owned subsidiary of City & Guilds was allocated more than £8 million by the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) to deliver the apprenticeships at Asda.

A spokesperson from the SFA said: “We would hope that employers and providers do not move this extra resource into significantly expanding their Intermediate Apprenticeships (Level 2) for 25-year-olds and over.”

The Agency has hinted that they won’t provide any additional funding in an attempt to reduce the growth in 25+ apprenticeships.

A document published by the SFA in June (click here) states: “We have not been able to agree at this time any additional funding for new 25+ Apprenticeship starts.”

“Although we are aware that freedoms and flexibilities allow providers to move money within their Adult Skills Budget, we expect the providers who are awarded growth to spend this as per the business cases submitted with the account teams.”

It later adds: “We want the sector to continue to focus on growth for those aged 19-24.”

Mr Keep said that a key statistic in the SFR next week should be the ratio between the number of young people wanting an apprenticeship, and the number of actual apprenticeship places available.

“At present, demand seems to be outstripping supply at an alarming level,” he said.

“With youth unemployment rising, EMAs vanishing (so earning and learning may be the only way to fund skill acquisition) and the cost of HE going up, more and more young people will want an apprenticeship place.  The problem that the government faces is that employers are free agents, and provide as many or as few opportunities for training as they choose.  I see few signs that employers are rising to the challenge that has been set them.”

The coalition government has smashed apprenticeship targets by giving providers greater freedom over funding provision.

This in turn has fuelled the surge in apprenticeships for learners aged 25 and above.

John Hayes, Minister of State for Further Education, Skills and Lifelong Learning said at the Conservative Party Conference 2011: “The government has put apprenticeships at the heart of our programme for skills. Apprenticeships are growing beyond labour’s wildest dreams.

“We’ve already delivered 100,000 new places and we will create 250,000 more apprenticeships over this parliament.”

Further analysis and a link to the SFR will be published here on October 27 shortly after 9.30am.

FE Week hosts House of Commons debate on FE Loans

The Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) are planning to replace funding with loans, for classroom and workplace adults (24+) learners studying Level 3 and above. Their consultation (click here to download) closes on Friday, so FE Week held a debate at the Houses of Commons to discuss the pros and cons.

The proposals for a loans system in further education (FE) were met with caution, and hostility by some. The attendees appreciated the current state of the British economy, as well as the government drive to cut spending and the overwhelming deficit. But the key question was whether introducing loans to FE from 2013/14 was the right policy.

The debate included contributions from Adrian Barley (Chair of the BIS Select Committee), Gordon Marsden (Shadow Minister for FE and Skills), representitives from the University and College Union (UCU), Daniel Khan (Chief Executive of Open College Network London Region) and Denise Brown-Sackey (Principal of Newham College).

The biggest issues surrounded how untested the proposals were and how no-one could predict the consequences of implementing such a significant loans system.

Gordon Marsden, MP for Blackpool South and Shadow Minister for Further Education, Skills and Regional Growth

Gordon Marsden said: “It hasn’t been tried yet. Whether it will be a good idea may become apparent as we go down the route.”

Adrian Barley added: “I think it’s fair to say that in effect this is an experiment and we don’t know what the consequences will be. And there will be many unintended consequences. And it’s very difficult to fully anticipate the way it will work out.”

Liz Shannon, Head of Parliamentary and External Affairs at UCU, said: “We aren’t in favour of having loans in this way. This entire consultation is going on in a bubble, and people aren’t really aware of it.”

 

Caireen Mitchell (Westminster Kingsway College), Denise Brown-Sackey (Newham College) and Liz Shannon (UCU)

Denise Brown-Sackey, Principal at Newham College of FE, said that she was concerned with how an FE loans system would affect her organisation’s ability to recruit adults.

Ms Brown-Sackey said: “I just think it’s an untested model. We need to look at some statistical analysis to see how many Level 3 learner progress onto higher education (HE), and I’d suggest that if it’s a high number of learners you start to have the notion that people are not going to take on the 4 years’ worth of debt to be educated to a degree.”

The proposals, if put into effect, would mean that learners apply for a loan to meet the upfront contribution costs of their course.

Students would receive up to £4,000, and this would be paid by government directly to the FE provider. The loan amount would vary depending on the funding rate of the course or qualification, and learners would only be required to pay the money back once they are earning £21,000 or more.

Any remaining debt would be written off after 30 years.

The whole notion of encouraging learners to take on debt for education is counter intuitive for the government policy on debt.”

The proposals echo the current loans system used in HE, a move which some argue is already controversial and unsuitable for FE.

Mr Barley said: “They’re modelling on the basis of what might be an optimistic assumption of payback of loans in HE. It could well be that if that is extended to FE and part-time courses, then if they go into lower income occupations there will be a higher rate of default of non-payment.”

Shane Chowen, former VP for FE at the NUS and FE Policy Consultant

Shane Chowen, an independent policy consultant, said that he was concerned with how many political figures were talking about FE learners as if they were in HE.

Mr Chowen said: “They use words like mobile, that people are free and that they’re empowered. The reality is that FE learners and nothing like HE learners. They’re not mobile.”

The FE loans system is a difficult proposition, but one many can sympathise with given the country’s bleak economic standing.

Mr Barley said: “It’s a clear demonstration, as with the funding of HE, that this is a finance driven set of proposals. It’s not based on a core educational, philosophical basis, or indeed an economic needs basis.”

Mr Marsden said: “Who knows what the circumstances will be in 2013/14. The present circumstances I would suggest are as adverse as they could possibly be in terms of setting a context for this introduction. So I do think there’s a real issue there.”

“The government is going on the philosophical basis of ‘nudge’ for many of the things they’re trying to do. Not having top down decision making, but putting in frame policies that nudge people in a particular direction,” Mr Marsden added.

The concept of encouraging student debt, however, is a less than perfect solution for tackling the government’s own debt problems.

It’s almost every year that we hear of some kind of horror story where ‘x’ number of people don’t get their loans on time, and that causes all sorts of problems for people paying rent.”

Ms Brown-Sackey said: “The whole notion of encouraging learners to take on debt for education is counter intuitive for the government policy on debt. This government talks constantly about how we’ve got to get the national debt down, and then trying to get learners to increase their personal debt for education and training.”

She added that the majority of the country’s current skill gaps revolved around Level 3 qualifications, and that implementing an FE loans system from this level and upwards was “counter intuitive”.

Ms Brown-Sackey said: “If you’re turning off your potential adult workforce at Level 3, and preventing them in the education and training market because of the amount of debt they’re going to take on, how are you going to get your workforce qualified to Level 3?”

There are other concerns with the government’s proposals though. The consultation states that the Student Loans Company (SLC) will be responsible for loan applications, assessment, the payment to colleges, and the repayments from learners.

Mr Chowen added that he was also concerned with the administrative capacity of the SLC to deal with such a loans system.

“It’s almost every year that we hear of some kind of horror story where ‘x’ number of people don’t get their loans on time, and that causes all sorts of problems for people paying rent.”

Professor Daniel Khan, Chief Executive of the Open College Network London Region

Professor Daniel Khan came armed with  London registration data for the Level 3 Access to HE Diploma in 2009/10. He pointed out that of the 6,882 registrations, 47% were for people age 25 and over. Of these, 72% were female, adding to concerns that the policy of introducing loans for these qualifications would disproportionately affect women.

As the debate concluded attendees expressed their expectation that many of these points would be raised with BIS.  It’ll be a radically different FE landscape in 2013/14, that’s for sure.

Responses to the BIS consultation can be made addressed to Andrew King via email (feloans@bis.gsi.gov.uk) by 21 October 2011. You may also wish to leave a comment on the FE Week website below.

Geoff Russell, CEO, Skills Funding Agency

One crisp Monday morning, back in 2009, Geoff Russell found himself sitting in the government’s Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills, with a shiny new Blackberry in his hand.

The previous Friday, he’d had a call about “a finance job somewhere in Whitehall”, but he wasn’t exactly sure what the job involved. “I was looking at the BBC website when I spotted that I had been appointed the chief executive of the Learning and Skills Council (LSC), which is actually how I found out about it, because no one had actually got round to telling me,” he recalls.

Russell, who is far more candid and witty than his reputation suggests, admits he turned to Google for help. “I hadn’t the faintest idea what the LSC was, let alone what further education was,” he says, laughing.

He may make light of it now, but he couldn’t have taken on the role at a more difficult time. His predecessor, Mark Haysom, had just resigned after the college capital funding fiasco and the quango was due to be disbanded to make way for two new organisations – the Young People’s Learning Agency (YPLA) and the Skills Funding Agency (SFA).

A self- confessed workaholic, Russell went into overdrive working “every single day, every single hour that I wasn’t sleeping.” He even started taking taxis to and from the office so to fit in more Blackberry time (funded out of his own pocket, he adds quickly, when his press manager starts eyeballing him). “I have never done anything so difficult in my life,” he says. “It was the biggest quango in the country, had five million customers, pushed out £50m a day doing all the education of 16-year-olds and it had also been abolished. So it needed to be fixed, run and then shut down… so it was about making sure all those people had a home and that the LSC came to a smooth landing while at the same time, the YPLA and the SFA had a safe take-off.”

In the public sector, they rarely measure what they deliver and they haven’t the faintest idea what it costs – so it is quite hard to measure performance.”

But with over 30 years experience in financial management in both the public and private sectors, Russell seemed well-equipped for the challenge. Raised in Canada, he relocated to the UK in 1988, when he was working with the accountancy giant KPMG. While he discovered early on in his career that he was a “pretty crappy accountant,” fortunately he was a good people manager, something he attributes to his subsequent career success.

Two years after arriving in the UK, Russell was offered a job in the Treasury looking after financial management policy in Whitehall, which proved to be a big culture shock. “I really wondered what sort of fantasy land I was in,” he says. “In the public sector, they rarely measure what they deliver and they haven’t the faintest idea what it costs – so it is quite hard to measure performance.”

He went back to KMPG after a couple of years, as a partner. But with new blood rising up the ranks, he sensed changes were afoot and decided to leave – which is when the LSC role came up.

Russell says he only planned to do a year in the job, but after being sat on by various government officials, agreed to stay on. “I was going round the country saying ‘Don’t worry it’s going to be alright’ to everyone and people started saying to me ‘It’s alright for you, you’re buggering off in April, aren’t you?’ So I felt a bit guilty about that…”

Behind Russell’s self-effacing, easy manner, there is a sense that he would like to say more or even, perhaps, that he has a mischievous side. The UK has the most complicated education system in the world, he says, at one point. “They try and simplify it and I have decided that actually what they do is this thing called ‘complification…’ he breaks off, with a mock-complaint that his press manager is giving him “significant looks.”

And while “things have got progressively more sane” since the LSC closed (he no longer works 18-hour days for one), there are still challenges. Government officials, for starters. “The culture change for someone like me from the private sector, who is used to making decisions rapidly based on, generally, an urgent need, always on imperfect information, without having to ask 16 people… I’m not saying that’s wrong, because that’s the way government works, but it’s hugely frustrating for me, who is not used to working that way,” he says.

But he is positive about moving from the “crisis management” involved in shutting down the LSC to a new “lighter, simpler, less bureaucractic” remit at the SFA. While there is currently a price list of some 10,000 courses, by 2013/14 this will have been reduced to just 30, he says. And a single adult skills funding pot should also make life easier for everyone in the sector, he says.

He bats off accusations that the implementation of this long-awaited simplified funding system has been delayed, saying he is not aware of “any specific commitment as to when we would bring in the new system.”
The SFA is actually running a kind of dress rehearsal at the moment (which he calls “shadow running”), he says, whereby providers will be told how much funding they would have got under the new system, so they can make plans for next year. “If you think about it, if you have a price list of 10,000 and you suddenly compress it down to 30, there are going to be some winners and losers. I’m a relatively impatient person, and I would like to put this system in tomorrow, but you can’t blow up the system even with good intentions. One of the comments we consistently got from the consultation was ‘you need to give us time to adjust, you need to communicate very clearly,’ so we have published quite clearly what we intend to do quite a long time in advance.”

Communication is clearly something Russell prides himself on, and he is well known in the sector for his weekly ‘what I’ve been up to’ emails to staff. But, he says, not everyone is so keen to hear about his weekend away or what his dogs have been up to. “I’ve had emails from quite junior people saying, “That is just drivel. How could you say that?’ And I always write them back and say, ‘Well, I’m sorry you think it was drivel, but actually that’s my life.’ Sometimes I might have to say that 200 people are leaving the organisation or bad things are happening. Some people say, ‘How can you sit there and talk about your dogs and then go on to talk about horrible things in the organisation?’ but the point is… if anyone in this organisation feels that they can write me an email and tell me what they think about the business or themselves or my dogs, that’s the kind of culture I want. I want an open culture where we say what we think.”

 it’s a cliché, to say that you transform people’s lives – but you really do.”

Also unpopular with some staff is his ambition to introduce performance related pay, he says. Some of them have told him, straight out, that they think it is divisive. “And I say, ‘yes it is. It is dividing people who are good and people who need to improve’… because we are an operational organisation it is easier to measure what our people deliver, so to my mind, it is not very healthy to have to pay two people the same amount, one working really hard and the other not doing very much. I think that’s divisive, and I’d rather annoy the people who aren’t doing very much than annoy the people who are contributing.”

While he has no firm plans to move on just yet, if the right opportunity came along, he would consider it, he says coyly, before adding that, earlier this year, he was asked to apply for a job running a university. I tell him I could see him running a new, privately-funded university. “No comment,” barks his press officer, rather too jovially and I wonder if I’ve struck gold.

The biggest reward of working in FE, says Russell, is going out to speak to learners. “I live pretty close to my emotions and some of the stories… I can barely tell this one,” he says, and for a horrible moment, it looks as if he might cry. He goes on to tell a story about a Polish student he met in Leicester who arrived in the UK three years ago with no English and has just been accepted into Oxford. “I have heard stories like that over and over and over again and yes, it’s a cliché, to say that you transform people’s lives – but you really do.”