Holt review finds employers ‘clueless’ on apprenticeships

The businessman behind a review into apprenticeships has spoken of the “cluelessness” surrounding the programme among employers.

Jason Holt has been tasked by the government to take charge of an employer-led review into how businesses can be encouraged to hire an apprentice.

Mr Holt, chief executive of Holts Group of Companies, was given the role in early February and has since been gathering evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) about what the government can be doing to reduce bureaucracy and simplify the process for recruiting and training new apprentices.

In an update on the progress of his review, Mr Holt told FE Week that there are three areas that he is currently investigating.

He said: “One is very much around the issue of awareness from the employer point of view; there’s a sense of cluelessness out there, which is unbelievable.

“Such as not being aware of what an apprenticeship is or where to begin in looking where to recruit an apprentice.”

Mr Holt also said there is an issue with schools. He said: “They are focused on an academic route and the opportunities for apprenticeships aren’t something that’s clearly defined. However, engaging schools with colleges and employers is something that I’m looking to investigate.”

The final area of investigation, he says, is “the process”, adding: “Where’s the best place to broker the marriage between an apprentice and an employer?

“Is it better at a local level or through the National Apprenticeship Service?”

Mr Holt also revealed that he is “getting to the end of the evidence gathering phase now”, but there is still time to submit views.

One of the ways Mr Holt is gathering evidence is through an online survey, which will stay open until the end of April.

He said: “The final phase is putting it together and testing recommendations with various business focus groups. So I’m beginning to form ideas, but they haven’t been fully formed just yet.”

The recommendations, Mr Holt expects, will go to ministers sometime in May.

Meanwhile, the government has revealed there is no current launch date for a separate employer-led review, which is due to assess quality of apprenticeships.

At the time of announcing Mr Holt’s review in February, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills signalled the separate review would be “launched shortly”, but no further announcement has been made.

A BIS spokesperson said: “It is important sufficient preparatory work is undertaken and that a suitable lead reviewer is secured, so as to ensure the review is as effective as possible. The review will take place alongside the extensive measures already undertaken and work currently underway to raise standards and improve quality of apprenticeships.”

Although the final scope and terms of reference for the review will be announced when the review is launched, BIS has given an insight into how it could be formed.

The spokesperson added: “The broad purpose of the review will be to take a medium-long term look at the future of apprenticeship standards in England; aiming to identify best practice and ensure every apprenticeship delivers professionally recognised qualifications which employers need, to world class benchmarks, and ensure that government is maximising the impact of public investment in apprenticeships.”

Survey says employers must pay

Majority of colleges and training providers support minimum fee for apprenticeships

A minimum employer fee for apprentices aged 19 or above has been supported by professionals in the further education (FE) sector, according to a new survey.

The research, conducted by Lsect, funding consultancy and publisher of FE Week, shows that of those who had a view, 60 per cent of respondents said they thought it would be a “quite good” or “very good” idea if the government introduced a minimum fee for 19+ apprenticeships.

Allan Lewis, managing director of Education and Training Associates Ltd, said: “It will create a level playing field and encourage greater commitment from employers towards the programme and its delivery.

“Hopefully it would lead to increased support to learners and increased monitoring of their progress by employers to achieve the outcomes.”

The survey had 194 respondents including senior managers of private training providers, union representatives, as well as MIS managers, principals and vice principals from FE colleges.

Mick Fletcher, a visiting Research Fellow at the Institute of Education and consultant, said: “There is little evidence of employer contributions in cash or kind.

“If employers want to ‘own’ skills they should pay their share, not seek to redirect taxpayers’ money to cover their own costs.”

The minimum fee could involve a variable but standard level of funding contribution, set by government, which colleges and training providers would have to collect from employers for any new apprentice aged 19 and above.

The fee could also be collected from the employer after the college or training provider has drawn down funding from its Skills Funding Agency (SFA) allocation.

Nick Linford, managing editor of FE Week, says it is “implausible” to expect that high quality training could be delivered without charging the employer.

Speaking at an evidence session held by the Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) Select Committee for their inquiry into apprenticeships last week, he said: “I think the only way to go, really, is down the route of minimum fees.

“If the government expects to get high quality the only way is for the employer to contribute and I think the government plays a huge role in changing the culture of employers to put their hand in their pocket and pay for it.

“Employers will expect a lot more when they pay for it and you know they’ll want it and use it well when they’re paying for it.”

Martin Doel, chief executive of the Association of Colleges (AoC) added during an earlier evidence session: “We need to get to grips with the employer contribution.”

Minimum employer fees were addressed in the “Independent review of fees and co-funding in Further Education in England” carried out by Christopher Banks CBE in July 2010.

“Any failure to collect the minimum fee would be reported and could lead to “clawback” of funding by the Government in an annual reconciliation process,” it states.

“In this way, the minimum fee approach would act as a stronger fees target system, where there is a real penalty for colleges and training providers, in terms of losing funding through clawback, if they fail to bring in the minimum fee.”

The Lsect survey also showed that of those who expressed a view about the issue, 40 per cent had reservations about introducing a minimum employer fee.

Breda Leyne, learning and development consultant at Cogito Development Projects, said: “Although I agree employers might value something they have paid for better in truth the need now is to get young people into some kind of work environment and that might need to have employers incentivised.”

The survey also asked professionals what they thought of the 12 month minimum duration introduced for apprentices aged 16 to 18.

Almost 90 per cent of respondents who had a view said the prescribed length of time was a “quite good” or “very good” idea, while just over 10 per cent thought it was a bad idea.

The survey also asked respondents what they thought of the rapid increase in apprentices aged 25 and above.

Of those who had a view, 54 per cent said they were not supportive of the growth in adult apprenticeships.

Click here for a more in-depth look at the survey results.

Innovation Code criticised for not going far enough

A new flexible provision to deliver programmes tackling localised skills needs has been introduced in the FE sector.

The Innovation Code, which formed part of the commitments featured within New Challenges, New Chances, is now live.

Although the Code has been widely well received, sector membership bodies have told FE Week that they hoped it would go further.

As set out by the Skills Funding Agency, it features six learning aims, which can be used to develop and deliver provision, in conjunction with local business and employers, which addresses current or future skills needs.

It comes following recommendations in Baroness Sharp’s report, issued in November, on colleges in their communities, A Dynamic Nucleus.

Association of Colleges’ (AoC) director of policy, Joy Mercer, said: “While the innovation code was one of the recommendations of Baroness Sharp’s report A Dynamic Nucleus, AoC and members of the commission had a wider vision.

“It was hoped the project would allow colleges to meet a whole range of needs in the community, for example working with people who face mental health problems, or rough sleepers who may be otherwise excluded.”

But, Mrs Mercer added: “However, this is a move in the right direction. This new system gives the flexibility to meet employment and skills needs in the community by developing a qualification after, rather than before, the learning begins.

“So, in this climate, it will be beneficial for students and colleges who are doing their best to meet the needs of their economy in the locality.

“We see this as the first step toward colleges being able to respond to the needs of the communities within which they already play a crucial role.”

Providers seeking to use the Code must be on the Agency’s Register of Training Organisations and the provision needs to be delivered within their existing allocation; there is no additional funding for using the Code.
However, there is no formal application process, nor do providers need to seek permission to use the Code.

According to the Agency, the Code can be applied for up to 12 months and providers will need to work with an Ofqual-recognised awarding organisation, so the provision can be migrated onto the Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF).

The 157 Group, although supportive of the Code, has questioned the funding mechanism.

A spokesperson said: “157 Group is fully supportive of any freedoms and flexibilities implemented to enable innovation to flourish within the sector. “However, it is unfortunate that funding can only be given under the Code for qualifications that can be linked to the QCF.”

David Hughes, chief executive of National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE), said the Code will show how useful it can be to jobseekers.

He said: “We know there are colleges and providers already wanting to use this new flexibility.

“I was with a college recently who wanted to provide essential learning that local people needed to help them get jobs locally.

“We know that without the Code these people wouldn’t have been able to access the learning they needed to get those jobs.”

FE Week mini-mascot (Edition 25)

Follow the adventures of FE Week’s biggest and smallest fan!

Mostly this week I have been doing a spot of bank holiday gardening”

And also you can follow our FE Week mini-mascot on Twitter @daniellinford

Youth unemployment falls by 9,000

The number of unemployed young people fell by 9,000 in the three months leading up to February 2012, Labour Market Statistics have shown.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has revealed there were 1.03 million unemployed 16 to 24 year-olds in the UK.

Excluding people in full time education, there were 719,000 unemployed 16 to 24 year-olds in the three months leading up to February 2012, down by 11,000 on the previous quarter.

However the ONS figures also show that the number of 16 to 24 year-olds in a job fell by 13,000 to 3.63 million.

The Labour Market Statistics show that the total number of unemployed people in the UK fell by 35,000 in the three months leading up to February 2012,, the first quarterly fall in unemployment since the three months leading up to May 2011.

Meanwhile there were more than 29 million people with a job aged 16 and above, an increase of 53,000 from the previous quarter.

(Read the Statistical Bulletin published by the Office for National Statistics here.)

Kensington and Chelsea student makes judge’s head turn on BBC’s The Voice UK

Excitement was at fever pitch at Kensington and Chelsea College after student Ruth-Ann St Luce impressed some of the biggest names in the music industry to secure her spot on BBC1’s prime time show ‘The Voice’.

Ruth was watched by more than 8 million people on Saturday night as she performed a moving rendition of Leona Lewis’s ‘Run’ to an all-star panel of Tom Jones, Jessie J, will.i.am and Danny O’Donoghue.

Unlike other talent shows the celebrity panel sit facing away from the acts and can only hear them. If the stars like what they hear, they have to hit their buzzer and turn their chair around – at which point they get to see the person.

Within moments of taking to the stage 18-year-old Ruth inspired global superstar, Jessie J to turn her chair.

Clearly moved by the teenager’s audition Jessie J said: “I couldn’t sing like that when I was that age. I am here to work on someone that I think could be phenomenal and I think she is definitely that.”

Now a firm contender in the fight to be crowned the UK’s next great voice, Ruth is getting ready for her once in a lifetime opportunity to be coached by Jessie J as she battles to win the show.

Ruth, who is studying for her Level 2 diploma in music, said: “I am just so overwhelmed right now…all my dreams are full of being a successful artist – I feel like it’s meant to be.”

The talented singer has already shown her versatility and star quality in several college music performances in front of industry names including award winning English rap star Akala.

Head of music at the college, Paul Hall said: “Ruth is a shining example of what can be achieved with the right attitude, dogged determination and a thirst to learn. She has an incredible talent and everyone at the college knows she has what it takes to go all the way.”

English and mathematics in apprenticeships

New Challenges, New Chances’ has made it clear that English and Mathematics remain key elements of the Apprenticeship Framework. Whilst there are some who may feel uncomfortable with the change in terminology there are many others who recognise the importance of providing a single uncomplicated message about what these skills are and why proficiency in them is so crucial.

As The Wolf Report – the Review of Vocational Education – described it …qualifications for the critical labour market skills of mathematics and English have been subject to serial redesign, especially in the case of qualifications for students on ‘vocational’ programmes.

Now there is no longer any debate, the transition phase provided by John Hayes is coming to an end, and in August Key Skills will finally be replaced by Functional English and Functional Mathematics. I am aware that many providers are concerned with this change as they see the Functional Skills as much more extensive in terms of teaching and learning requirements, much more complex in terms of their assessment demands and therefore much more threatening in terms of levels of achievement and performance.

English and Mathematics skills are essential elements of a skilled individual”

However, in the context of apprenticeships those young people who have previously found little value in the academic side of English and Mathematics as subjects have the ideal opportunity to understand their importance as skills in a vocational context that is meaningful to, and valued by, them. In terms of developing English and Mathematics in apprenticeships, context is all and there are many case studies and examples of effective practice that highlight how best to develop, engage and motivate the most reluctant of learners.

The real challenge and the great unknown are unlikely to be the teaching and learning but rather the appropriateness and the applicability of the assessment regimes of the Functional Skills qualifications. Whilst in many ways Key Skills and Functional Skills are congruent in terms of teaching and learning, they are not in respect of the approaches to assessment that are on offer. Each awarding organisation has been given the opportunity to develop their own solutions that meet the Ofqual qualification criteria rather than adhere to a centrally developed assessment regime that is identical for all.

This means that for the first time within the apprenticeship framework there is a real opportunity for providers to select assessment regimes that match the rhythm and structure of their programmes as well as seeking out an awarding organisation that better reflects and responds to their needs.

So whilst we can expect some nervousness in the sector in the first instance I am confident that sooner rather than later the professionalism of providers, together with the market demands placed on AOs, will shape approaches to assessment that will meet the needs of those delivering Functional Skills in the context of apprenticeships.

There is concern in some quarters that the Government is about to make all apprenticeship frameworks irrespective of level have a minimum requirement of a Level 2 in Functional Skills or A*-C GCSEs. This is not my understanding; New Challenges, New Chances makes it clear that whilst a Level 2 achievement in English and Mathematics should be the aspiration for all young people in education and training, there is no intention of changing frameworks at this time.

Indeed the introduction of modular, or stepping stone, qualifications is designed to create a more realistic and viable journey towards Functional Skills and GCSEs for those who continue to find English and Mathematics a potential barrier to progression.

I know that there are those who would like to remove the English and Mathematics components from the apprenticeship framework. Their thesis is: why should the workplace address the failures of the school system? The answer to that is simple: English and Mathematics skills are essential elements of a skilled individual and these skills need to be developed in a place, at a time and in a way that has greatest benefit for and impact on the individual – for many young people that place, time and way is through an apprenticeship.

Barry Brooks
Group Strategy Director, Tribal

This expert piece appears in our special Apprenticeships Supplement. Click the banner below to download it!

Putting the HE in FE at AoC Conference

Caroline Neville, Senior Policy Adviser, BIS         Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, Vince Cable

Debate surrounding the introduction of FE loans for adult learners has been a prominent part of the sector in recent months.

And at the Association of Colleges’ (AoC) Annual HE in FE Conference at Holiday Inn London Kings Cross last month it was no different.

After all, the impact of the system, introduced for the 2013/14 academic year, with learners applying from next March if they are over 24 and studying at level 3 or higher, on a students’ progression into higher education is somewhat unknown.

This unfamiliar territory was addressed at the conference by Caroline Neville, senior policy advisor at the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) – although she assured delegates that work is being carried out to align the HE and FE systems.

She said: “If you going to have to take a loan out for your Level 3 and Level 4 and then you’re going to go on and secure other responsibilities in terms of HE loans, that might put you off.

“We don’t yet know the impact, but there has been an enormous amount of work I have to say.

“I very often sit next to the lead on loans in further education who works hand in glove with HE colleagues to try to make sure the two systems are aligned.

“They are not the same. But there are important considerations to ensure you haven’t got a loan system for FE that is totally different in its criteria for HE.

“There has been research in terms of focus groups and lots of research face-to-face and survey research on when the policy is explained, what would your decision be? It’s only research but it has been encouraging.”

Mrs Neville said ministers have asked for Access to HE enrolments to be “very closely” monitored by the Department, particularly “because it’s aimed at mature students to see if there’s an impact on enrolments”.

She also said that a task group has been set up to monitor the “unintended consequences” of the introduction of FE loans.

Sir Alan Langlands, Chief Executive, HEFCE         Andy Youell, Director of Standards and Development, HESA

“Very interestingly, after years of decline, the last couple of years, certainly two years, enrolments to Access have had a 22 per cent increase I think.

“I accept the recession and all of those things will mean more people may come to college, but you would want to continue to support Access,” she added.

The subject was also addressed by the Business Secretary, Dr Vince Cable, who described the FE loan system as “breaking new ground”.

He added: “We don’t know how it’s going to work.

“But I think it’s important in principle to recognise that people dong vocational training at that level should be treated in the same way as those doing an academic degree and that will involve over the next couple of years.”

Away from FE loans, another discussion point at the conference was the core and margin places.

Last month, Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) announced that more than half of student places, with tuition fees of less than £7,500,had been handed to FE colleges.

A total of 20,000 were divided between 190 universities and colleges – with 9,643 places distributed between 35 higher education institutions (HEIs) and 10,354 places between 155 FE colleges.

Although Sir Alan Langlands, the chief executive of HEFCE, could not say how many places would be available in the future, he did confirm that the system is “not just for Christmas.”

He said: “The margin for this year, the redistribution of 20,000 students, is not somehow just a pulse that will move through the system and stop.

“This is forever. So my takeaway message is core and margin 12/13 is not just for Christmas, it’s something to take into the future.”

Dr Cable also brought up the subject during his conference address, when he said: “What we have tried to do in government is to try to free up the higher and further education system from regulatory controls at the centre.

“One of the mechanisms is the core margin which is taking places away from higher education institutions and opening them up to bids from some universities, the lower end of the cost range, and FE colleges.

“This year was the first experience of that.”

There are contradictions in the current policy environment in higher education”

Discussions at the conference also evolved around the need for HE and FE to work with each other, despite areas of competition.

Sir Langlands said: “The current changes and uncertainties in HE and FE policy do give rise to tensions.

“We have a strong and a diverse tertiary education system in this country and we need to work through these tensions.

“Sometimes that means competition at the boundary between higher and further education and other times that means collaboration.”

He later added: “The job of HEFCE and the other national agencies is that HE in FE has to be handled on a level playing field with other provision.

“That doesn’t always come naturally.

“There are contradictions in the current policy environment in higher education and contradictions in the boundary between HE and FE.

“I guess the overall message is let’s not to be too fussy in just patrolling these boundaries but try to get across these boundaries,” he said.

Mrs Neville, meanwhile, described “higher vocational education” as a “developing and important area”, adding: “Developing in it has a long history…and important in terms of the nation’s needs; the needs of the economy, balancing the economy, and social mobility.”

Mrs Neville also said that the recent HE White Paper was “the first time that further education was mentioned in a significant way”.

She said: “HEFCE’s publications have been very high profile in terms of further education’s role.

“White Papers have tended to be about universities and of course this was too, but it also made that very strong point about diversity of provision going forward and the role of further education was acknowledged.”

Dr Cable said the HE in FE “issue is an important one” for two reasons.

He said: “It relates to something I’ve been committed to since I took up this job and that’s breaking down the boundaries between higher and further education and between academic and vocational, although they are not exactly the same issue, they overlap to some degree.

“There was an unfortunate apartheid in post school education, a sense of hierarchy that I thought was unhealthy, and what we are trying to do is re-balance and give vocational education its proper value and further education its proper value.

“Part of that is ensuring the boundary between higher and further education becomes blurred.”

He added: “We want to build in that flexibility into system.

“Many FE colleges are very innovative and thinking of new ways of delivering, taking into account cost convenience and types of pupils, and all my experience in this job is that FE colleges in general are extraordinarily exciting and innovative places and I always get uplifted when I visit one at the things that are happening.”

Another key point of the conference was discussed by Andy Youell, the director of standards and development at Higher Education Statistics Authority (HESA), who gave an update on the Key Information Set (KIS), which will be implemented from September.

He said: “The KIS is a key part of the government’s strategy in terms of opening up the market; providing potential students with objective information to inform decision making.

“Now that students are at the heart of the system and the funding is determined on where the student goes, a student needs solid reliable information on which to base their investment decision.”

He added: “As things currently set out, the KIS should be generated for every undergraduate course of more than one full-time equivalent (FTE); so it can be full-time and it can be part-time courses but anytime that lasts for more than one FTE.”

 

Tracking progression of apprentices to HE

New research is being used to monitor and track the progression of apprentices into higher education (HE).

Led by the University of Greenwich, the research is funded by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) and comes on the back of previous research which has looked at students from 2005/06 and beyond.

Speaking during a breakout session at the conference, Hugh Joslin, project director at the university, said: “Progression rates for vocational learners and apprenticeships are low.

“HEFCE invested millions in lifelong learning networks and in Aim Higher to try and raise progression rate of non-traditional students.

“Some headway has been made, but when we look at progression rates of apprenticeships it’s a good news story, but we still need to do a lot of work.”
The project takes four cohorts of learners and looks at those progressing directly into HE the next year, or leaving it a year or even another year.

Previous studies have suggested the progression rate from FE to HE is around six per cent, but Mr Joslin said: “What we have found for the 2005/06 cohort, tracked over four years, that figure is 13.1 per cent.

“Signs are, when we track again this year and have another four years, that will be increased again – it’s very positive.”

He also explained the North East has the highest rate, with 16.3 per cent progressing to HE, while East of England has the lowest, with nine per cent going into HE in the four years after completing apprenticeships.

Meanwhile, 20 per cent of apprentices who progress into HE live in disadvantaged areas, compared to 15 per cent of young HE entrants. Mr Joslin said: “That gives an important message about social mobility.”

Behind these figures there has been a backdrop of increasing participation in Advanced Level apprenticeships – up 36 per cent between 2005 and 2009.

Despite this, the progression rate is encouraging, with a real terms increase of 24.5 per cent, which “is a positive message about opening up the pathways”, Mr Joslin explained.

Funding for the research has been extended to track the 2009/10 cohort into HE in 2010/11.
The university is also “looking backwards” to see how apprentices have progressed from Level 2 to Level 3, while it will also look at more fields, breakdowns of location and HE in FE.

Hugh Joslin, project director at University of Greenwich

Marathon man at South Cheshire College

A sports tutor has notched up another success in his running career after finishing runner-up in the Stafford Half Marathon.

South Cheshire College lecturer Chris Hollinshead was roared on by supporters in his home town to cross the finish line in one hour, 14 minutes.

The 46-year-old won the event in 2006 but proved he still had the legs to fend off the challenge of some of the young guns who entered the race.

Chris is a member of the Stafford Harriers Running Club and has his sights set on the London marathon in April.

Chris said: “The course is quite undulating so it was tiring but I was very pleased to finish runner up.

“It was a great feeling because a lot of local people came out to support me which means a lot.”