Verity Hancock, principal, Leicester College

From a meeting of minds at university in London almost 100 years ago an education leader was born.

Verity Hancock, now principal at Leicester College, said her grandmothers, both just a generation ahead of working down the mine pits, studied together in the 1920s.

This special friendship led to her parents meeting when they were just two years old and, despite hating each other as teens, they eventually married in their thirties.

“My grandmothers were very unusual — they were trailblazers,” says the 45-year-old who recognises the influence of her ancestral roots. “They didn’t come from privileged backgrounds and one went on to become Bolton’s first female librarian and the other a teacher.”

“My own parents were very educated, intelligent and they were all about happiness and confidence —they expected us to work hard and do well but weren’t pushy.”

Perhaps it was this attitude that spawned such a successful career for Verity who eventually became executive director of the Skills Funding Agency and personally developed the National Careers Advice Service before taking her current role at one of the UK’s largest colleges — and with no former teaching experience.

Her journey upwards began with a place to read law at Oxford University on condition she got just two E grades after an impressive entrance paper.

“I was very competitive with my parents,” she says. “They both went to Oxford so I thought why can’t I?”

Of course Verity, who grew up in Bishop’s Stortford, Hertfordshire, was never going to get just two Es. After attending her local comprehensive school, Herts and Essex High School, she scored an A in English literature, a B in history and a C in Latin.

“Latin was very, very hard,” she admits.

“It wasn’t like a language, it was more like maths and if I was sat there on a Sunday evening and heard the music from the Southbank Show and I still hadn’t completed my exercises I knew I was in trouble.”

Verity remembers a happy childhood with her younger sister, her mother, a modern languages teacher, and father, an administrator for the colonial service in Africa before working for an awarding body.  Her formative years were full of thousands of books, trips to castles, stately homes and churches, and they were a very musical family.

But on going to Oxford the choral singer and flute player quickly became disillusioned and realised she had no passion or empathy for law.

Education can make or break people’s happiness”

“I worked hard and got a 2.1 but came out knowing I would never think about law again,” she recalls. “I loved Oxford but I really had no careers information, advice or guidance which is one reason it was always something I was interested in.”

She decided to go back to her roots and returned to City & Guilds where she’d toiled as a teenager adding up marks in the basement. In her first proper job she spent several months in exams teams and decided she wasn’t going to leave.

“It was like a united nations — a very diverse work team which I loved,” she says.

She worked in the engineering and motoring division and ended up staying four years, tailor-making qualifications for big employers, but she realised she was ambitious and wanted to manage people.

“It was so hierarchical — and I realised I had to go somewhere else,” she says.

She moved to become a manager at the Training and Enterprise Council movement and over four years fostered a love of North London working across secondary schools and colleges in Harrow and Brent, getting big groups of employers to come into schools and work with youngsters.

“Employers got to understand a lot of young people who they might have had preconceptions of, particularly those from black and ethnic minority backgrounds who they’d been fed stories about being really behind and ill-disciplined. They soon realised many of these were bright, able and really articulate and the type of children they’d want to employ,” she says.

“I remember one young man who said he spent 80 per cent of his school time avoiding violence but he soon became really enthusiastic about becoming a lawyer or an accountant and wanted to carry on the path of education.”

It is this work Verity feels most proud of and led to her interest in the strategic role colleges could play within communities. In 2001 and at the age of just 33 she went for an executive director role at the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) which had just been set up.

“I rather daringly went for the job and got it much to the surprise of many,” she recalls.

“It felt fantastic — I was the youngest of 47 executive directors and I could bring energy and enthusiasm.”

Education is one of the only things that matters”

After another stint of four years she was asked to run the central London office and be the deputy director for London which led to her becoming regional director of the East Midlands. It was around this time she met her artist husband, Mark, and soon fell pregnant with Theo who is now three-and-a-half years old.

While she was on maternity leave LSC finished and the Skills Funding Agency was created.

“I missed a huge chunk of change,” she says.

“I came back as executive director of capacity and infrastructure with the SFA but I missed the forming and storming which was weird. We then moved to Leicester 18 months ago and it was then I started to think about doing something a little bit different.”

The ambitious director next made her way into the position of principal at Leicester, which has more than 26,000 learners.

“I haven’t worked in a college — I’ve been a college governor and worked with colleges but not in one.  I feel it’s very much incumbent on me to gain credibility and I’m conscious that most people expect you to have come up through the ranks.”

But she admits she is “confident, has the leadership, financial skills and knowledge to make it work”. “I’m not complacent but not full of total trepidation.”

Education, she says, is “one of the only things that matters”.

“Education can make or break people’s happiness throughout their lives. I’ve seen the core benefits it gave my family for generations. It isn’t just about earning money it’s about happiness and education values. It can make the difference between a good life and a bad life and everyone deserves the chance to experience the good.”

As she works fulltime Mark looks after Theo two days a week and so weekends are all about family time, going to the countryside, walking and friends.

Verity’s work ethic is set to continue in her new role.

“I expect to work very hard as principal. I’m looking forward to the responsibility of steering the ship — I’m really excited,” she says.

It’s a personal thing

What’s your favourite book? 

The Shining Levels by John Wyatt

What did you want to be when you were younger?

A mountaineer or a musician

What do you do to switch off from work?

I know far too much about the Octonauts from watching CBeebies with my toddler. I also like walking

If you could invite anyone to a dinner party, living or dead, who would it be?

Fairport Convention — I’m a bit of an old hippy really

What would your super power be? 

To teleport without having to get on any form of transport

Traineeship plan revealed

Plans for a new training scheme to equip young people with “the confidence, skills and experience needed to find work” has been announced.

FE minister Matthew Hancock has revealed a potential traineeship model, which could be in place by September 2013, and would see 16 to 24-year-olds not in education or struggling to find work complete “flexible and tailor-made” work preparation sessions, a high-quality work placement and help if they have not achieved a GCSE grade C in English and maths.

It was in June 2012, at the CBI Jobs Summit, that the government first referred to plans to pilot traineeships for “the teenagers who aren’t ready for an apprenticeship”. The Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, said then that “more detail will be coming soon”.

Mr Hancock is now urging employers and training providers to help shape the initiative’s progression by giving their opinions on the plans.

We are introducing traineeships to help young people with the skills they need to get a job, and hold down a job.

More than 700 people tuned into an FE Week ministerial webinar with Mr Hancock on Thursday, with participants encouraged to pose questions and hear the minister’s views on the plan for traineeships.

John Evans, vice-principal at Swindon College, asked: “What is the difference between a traineeship and the already launched 16-19 study programmes as the reported models are exactly the same. This will further confuse the current offer to young people?”

Mr Hancock said: “The traineeship is aimed at 16 to 24-year-olds, not just 16 to 19-year-olds. Also it is an option within a study programme and is particularly aimed at those who don’t have strong English and maths.”

The discussion document about traineeships asks 12 questions about what a traineeship programme for 16 to 18-year-olds on study programmes, and the young unemployed (19 to 24-year-olds), should look like.

Mr Hancock said: “We are introducing traineeships to help young people with the skills they need to get a job, and hold down a job.

“That’s vital for our economy to compete in the global race. And it’s a question of fairness. Traineeships will give young people the helping hand and experience they need to compete for apprenticeships and good jobs.”

The Department for Education (DfE) devised an outline for traineeships, expected to last around six months, after a CBI annual education and skills survey showed that 61 per cent of employers thought many young people lacked “work-related skills and attitudes which they needed to sustain employment”.

The DfE said in the third quarter of 2012 there were 206,000 16 to 18-year-olds and 821,000 19 to 24-year-olds not in education, employment or training (NEET) and evidence showed these young people are more likely than their peers to suffer unemployment, low pay, poor health and depression.

Professor Alison Wolf, who wrote a report for the government on the subject, said: “In my Review I argued that the government needed to address this issue as a matter of urgency, and I am delighted to see that they are indeed doing so.”

Graham Hoyle, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, said: “The development of traineeships represents a hugely significant step forward in ensuring young people currently without a job or training opportunity are better equipped to find either an apprenticeship or other type of worthwhile employment.”

Martin Doel, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said: “We have been arguing for some time for a pre-apprenticeship ‘offer’ to young people, a mixture of training and work experience that makes them attractive to employers and competitive for apprenticeships or for other jobs with training. We therefore welcome this consultation and the thinking that underlies the questions that it poses.”

The government said its aim was to make traineeships the “preferred route” for those aspiring to apprenticeships who needed additional training.

Intensive traineeships were also being proposed for those with no work experience and very few qualifications.

Traineeships for 16 to 19-year-olds are proposed to be delivered as part of study programmes and for 19 to 24-year-olds training providers will be able to make use of the Adult Skills Budget.

You can send your views to traineeships.discussion@education.gsi.gov.uk” by February 8, 2013.

————————————————————————————————————–

Editorial : Time for traineeships

The sector, myself included, has broadly welcomed the plans to introduce a scheme to support young people into work and apprenticeships.

This is not surprising given the raising of the participation age to 18 by 2015, and current high levels of youth unemployment.

However, why has it taken 197 days since the government first mentioned plans for traineeships, before publishing this ‘discussion document’?

It is important that lessons are learned from past schemes (like entry to employment) and current ones (such as access to apprenticeships).

Typically, it’s the lack of an employer that’s the problem.

So in the short discussion and implementation time left, it’s critical employers not only help devise the programme, but also take advantage of it.

Nick Linford, editor

Uncertainty warning over apprentice loans

The Shadow FE Minister has described it as “deeply alarming” that government-commissioned research says apprentices do not understand how they would be affected by FE loans.

Gordon Marsden (right) spoke out after the Department of Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) revealed a report commissioned to assess how 24+ Advanced Learner Loans would affect course uptake. The loans system, due to go ahead in a few months, was introduced after study grants for learners aged over 24 were scrapped as part of austerity measures.

Mr Marsden said the research, based on findings from focus groups with Muslims, 40+ learners, apprentices and learners with disabilities, “starkly highlights the fact they (the government) have no idea what introducing loans for adult apprentices could do to either employer demand or learner behaviour”.

Under a section titled ‘likely behaviour from 2013 onward’ the report said: “Apprentices in this sample were relatively unconcerned about the impact that removal of the subsidy would have on people in their situations, but this was largely due to the fact that they assumed that employers would continue to fund courses. They did not know this for sure, however, and many eventually wondered whether apprentices would have to pay for their courses if employers did not.”

It continued: “On balance it was difficult to establish what apprentices — younger and older — are likely to do from 2013 onwards because of the lack of information about what employers would do.”

 starkly highlights the fact they (the government) have no idea what introducing loans for adult apprentices could do to either employer demand or learner behaviour”.

Mr Marsden said: “With the new system merely months away, FE Minister Matthew Hancock and BIS Ministers urgently need to engage with this issue and ensure there is not a significant drop in 24+ apprenticeship numbers.”

FE Week reported in its last edition how Mr Marsden criticised the government for not commissioning a national marketing campaign to fully inform people of the new loans system.

A BIS spokesperson said: “While some (apprentices) are understandably unsure until they have seen the details and discussed with their employers, the research did suggest that many were likely to accept this and use a 24+ Advanced Learning Loan, particularly younger groups.”

The recent BIS-commissioned report found that 24+ Advanced Learner Loans were most likely to put off older learners from studying as they were more “savvy” with money and saw study more as “nice to have”, rather than a necessity.

The University and College Union (UCU) expressed their concern over this, warning that the increased costs might exclude older and poorer people from studying.

UCU general secretary Sally Hunt said: “The government’s excuse to cut funding for adults to concentrate resources on the younger generation completely falls down when you study this report. At a time of high unemployment ministers should be looking to make it easier for people to retrain and study at college instead of coming up with new ways to price them out.”

BIS’s research concluded that younger people (between 24 and 29 years old) were most motivated to take up opportunities in FE as they thought more in the short-term and did not feel loans would put them off a course.

Provider contract to be cut short amid debt claim

The Skills Funding Agency is tearing up an £800,000 training contract with a Hertfordshire-based provider amid claim the firm owes at least one subcontractor nearly £18,000.

Train 4 Work Ltd, which was allocated the contract under the agency’s Adult Skills Budget for 2012/13, was “formally notified” of the move more than two months ago.

The reason behind the termination of the contract remains unclear as FE Week was unable to contact the firm and the agency failed to say why it was taking action.

Due to operational issues within their organisation Train 4 Work was unable to pass on the agreed level of funding to Integer at the time the training programmes took place, but it has since made attempts to settle its debts.

However, Train 4 Work is understood to have suffered “operational issues,” while one former subcontractor said it was looking at having to write off the firm’s debt.

Mark Mayhew is listed on LinkedIn as the firm’s managing director — a position he has held since December 2010, it says. However, FE Week was unable to contact him.

The UK Register of Training Providers lists Peter Wilson as programme manager. He told FE Week he left the firm in June last year, but declined to comment further.

A joint statement from the agency and the National Apprenticeship Service (NAS) said: “The Skills Funding Agency took the decision to give three months’ notice to terminate the contract between the chief executive of skills funding and Train 4 Work Ltd.

“The provider was formally notified on November 1, 2012, and accordingly the contract will terminate on January 31, 2013. We do not comment on details of contractual arrangements between the agency and a provider.”

It added: “Our priority is to ensure minimal disruption to apprentices, learners and employers.

“The agency and NAS are working with Train 4 Work Ltd to ensure that all learners and apprentices are transferred to an alternative provider.”

Train 4 Work, formed in 2007, was last inspected by Ofsted in October 2010 at which point it had 312 Train to Gain learners and got a satisfactory grading.

An inspection the previous year resulted in an inadequate grading and saw the agency’s predecessor, the Learning and Skills Council, withdrew funding for new learners.

Improvements registered during a monitoring visit in January 2010 saw funding restored.

During its most recent inspection, Train 4 Work operated with three subcontractors in Oxfordshire-based security experts Skillsbank, Cornwall-based spectator safety firm Integer Training and the health and social care-related Three Counties Training, in Worcestershire.

A spokesperson for Integer Training said: “We sub contracted from Train 4 Work in 2010/11.

“Due to operational issues within their organisation Train 4 Work was unable to pass on the agreed level of funding to Integer at the time the training programmes took place, but it has since made attempts to settle its debts.

“The outstanding balance of £17,776.45 may well have to be written off.”

A Skillsbank spokesperson said it dealt with Train 4 Work for two years, ending in 2010 but declined to comment further, and FE Week could not contact Three Counties
Training.

The joint statement from the agency and NAS added: “We are contacting all affected apprentices, learners and employers to inform them of the situation and offer support and commitment as required.

“Any concerned employers, apprentices and learners can contact the agency at sfaemployerenquiries@skillsfundingagency.bis.gov.uk”

Pearson puts 560 staff at jobs risk

Hundreds of FE workers are facing redundancy after Pearson announced it was planning to close an adult education branch of the business with a loss of £120m.

Pearson in Practice, which is built around Melorio, a company bought by Pearson two years ago for £99.3m, is launching a 90-day consultation on the firm’s future.

Changes to apprenticeships, including a shift from programmes delivered by training providers toward programmes delivered by employers, were said to be behind the move.

“We believe Pearson in Practice no longer has a sustainable business model,” said a Pearson spokesperson.

Representatives for Pearson in Practice’s 560 members of staff are being appointed for the consultation.

Pearson in Practice has been in close dialogue with the agency and NAS to provide reassurance on the planned closure, which will take place pending an orderly wind-down period.

It is understood that 5,000 learners will be affected, but Pearson said it was “fully committed to supporting all Pearson in Practice learner and apprentices to complete their courses on their current timetables whether with Pearson in Practice or, if it is more appropriate, through transferring them to another training provider.”

Pearson chief executive John Fallon said: “We very much regret the decision to plan for closure, but we believe we have explored and exhausted all alternatives.

“Our focus in the coming months will be on working with our partners in the further education sector and industry to ensure minimum disruption to learners who are currently enrolled in one of our programmes.”

The announcement came on Monday, January 7, and will affect Pearson in Practice Technology Limited and Pearson Skills Based Learning Limited.

It will see Pearson writing off £120m, but the firm will still have a presence in the UK adult training market through TQ Holdings — a Derbyshire-based vocational and technical education provider to the defence, engineering, oil and gas and construction sectors — which it acquired in late 2011.

It is also a shareholder in Gas Logic, which provides adult training in the energy sector, and owns Pearson Work Based Learning, which last year helped deliver 170,000 apprenticeships in the UK and abroad through brands including BTec and LCCI.

“The cost of closure and impairment is expected to be around £120m and will be reflected as a loss on disposal in Pearson’s 2012 statutory accounts,” said the Pearson spokesperson.

He added: “We will continue to provide training and support for young adults who wish to develop skills and enter the UK workforce through our qualifications and curriculum businesses,particularly Pearson Work Based Learning.”

Pearson in Practice was renamed last year having previously been called Zenos, formerly a Melorio firm.

The renaming followed criticism of the apprenticeship scheme delivered by Zenos in the Panorama programme The Great Apprentice Scandal, broadcast on BBC One.

The ICT apprenticeships delivered by Zenos were said to be entirely classroom-based and could not guarantee learners a job at the end.

A joint statement on the Pearson in Practice announcement was issued by the Skills Funding Agency and National Apprenticeship Service (NAS).

It said: “Pearson in Practice has been in close dialogue with the agency and NAS to provide reassurance on the planned closure, which will take place pending an orderly wind-down period.

“Learners and apprentices will be kept fully informed as these discussions progress.”

It added: “Any affected parents, guardians, learners, apprentices or employers can contact Pearson in Practice directly.”

New chair Stott starts with AoC

new governors’ chair has been appointed at the Association of Colleges after John Bingham stepped down following six years at the helm.

The Yorkshire-born telecommunications and IT specialist has been replaced by Carole Stott, chair of governors at London’s City Lit.

Association chief executive Martin Doel said: “A great deal has been achieved in the time of John’s stewardship. He was a guiding light for all of us during his time as chair.

“He brought with him deep experience and knowledge of the sector that he built up as an establishing member of the Yorkshire and Humberside Association of Colleges, and national board member from 2001.”

Mr Bingham has stepped down from the association board and has also left the governors’ board at South Yorkshire’s Thomas Rotherham College, which he also chaired, after 20 years’ service.

“While John will undoubtedly be missed by the organisation, we will continue to offer the best of services with his successor Carole Stott, who comes to us with years of experience of chairing the board of governors at City Lit,” added Mr Doel.

Ms Stott, who has been on the association governors’ board since 2008, is a qualified teacher who has taught in further education, schools and university.

She was chief executive of the National Open College Network for five years from 1999 and was a director at Credit Works from 2004 to 2012.

She currently sits on the governors’ board at the City of Bath College and has been City Lit governors’ chair since 1999. It won an outstanding grade following Ofsted inspection in 2011.

“I believe absolutely in the importance of further and adult education as a powerful force for good, capable of transforming people’s lives and promoting economic and social vitality,” said Ms Stott.

“The position of association chair offers a great opportunity to play a key role in this important and diverse sector, which touches the lives of many people and communities.”

City Lit principal Mark Malcomson said: “We are truly delighted with Carole’s appointment.

“She has been an exceptional chair of City Lit and seen us achieve Ofsted outstanding and Investors in People Gold. The association and its members are very lucky to have Carole representing us.”

Fears over new apprenticeship code

A new code of conduct at the National Apprenticeship Service (NAS) for dealing with queries about providers has sparked concerns that “subjective and third-hand” official advice could be dished out.
The Service Standard sets out how NAS handles calls from employers looking into apprenticeships.

It outlines how NAS aims to put small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in touch with suitable providers.

It was launched along with a nationwide radio advertising campaign promoting apprenticeships and news the government was extending the £1,500 Apprenticeship Grant for Employers of 16 to 24-year-olds (AGE 16-24) to March 2014.

Ofsted ratings are not the favoured criteria of SMEs who usually ask about how a provider has helped another SME in their sector.”

However, the Service Standard has alarmed many in the FE sector by stating that a single “most appropriate college or training provider” would be put forward.

It says NAS would choose which providers to refer on the basis of, among others, employer needs, specialisation, success rates and track record.

Paul Eeles, chief executive at EMFEC (formerly East Midlands Further Education Council) said: “It is important the criteria used are only based on evidence of college and provider performance, rather than subjective views and third-hand understanding of provision.

“It may be beneficial for NAS to publish these criteria for the college and provider community.”

Association of Colleges director of policy Joy Mercer said it would be “monitoring” the NAS summary system and how provides its recommendations “to ensure it gives all colleges an equal opportunity”.

She said: “In some cases where there is a single provider highlighted there may only be one in a very specific field. But where there is a number of providers who fit the bill we would expect the SME to be made aware of all the potential providers.”

And Victor Farlie, executive chair of the London Work Based Learning Alliance, said he wanted to see the selection criteria “strengthened”

He said: “Providers with Ofsted 2 grade for leadership and management should be given first crack at referrals, and secondly no subcontractors.

“The latter point is a hot potato in London as so much of the volume growth — particularly among FE colleges — has been generated this way.

“Basically, we want quality to be the driving influence on referrals and service delivery.”

An AELP (Association of Employment and Learning Providers) spokesperson said: “Naturally, good quality providers will want to be assured that they are getting a fair crack of the whip on the referrals being made.”

A NAS spokesperson said employers would be told about how many providers met its requirements.

“If more than one provider meets their criteria we will mention this, but most often employers ask us for one name,” he said.

“To get to the fewest providers we will ask the employer to tell us what is most important to them, which might be for example where the provider’s physical premises are or what its success rates are.

“No information will be withheld from the employer – we’re facilitating the employer to make an informed choice.”

He added: “Ofsted ratings are not the favoured criteria of SMEs who usually ask about how a provider has helped another SME in their sector.”

No more funding for qualifications, warns SFA

Providers and employers could be set to lose funding for qualifications in a clampdown on awarding organisations that don’t register to an official learner record service.

The Skills Funding Agency wants all Ofqual-recognised awarding organisations to sign the Personal Learning Record (PLR) Awarding Organisation Agreement.

It told them all in September last year they had to sign up, and has now published a list of those yet to do so.

Going forward, we will continue to keep the issue of signing up to the PLR under review.”

The agency warned that if awarding organisations didn’t sign, funding for their qualifications “will cease from August 1”.

The situation would mean there was no agency cash for providers and employers in offering the qualifications of awarding organisations that hadn’t signed.

A statement on the agency website said: “On September 28, 2012, the chief executive of Skills Funding wrote to colleges and training organisations to advise them about the implementation of the PLR.

“This confirmed that Ofqual-recognised awarding organisations that had not signed the PLR Awarding Organisation Agreement and begun to upload achievement data would cease to be funded for new starts on their qualifications with effect from August 1, 2013.”

The PLR, managed by the Learning Records Service, launched in 2008 and enables the sharing of learner and achievement data across the education and skills sector.

The agency said 136 awarding bodies had met the requirement to be on the system by November last year.

But more than 100 qualifications — of those listed in the SFA’s spreadsheet entitled QCF Qualifications confirmed for public funding as part of the single adult skills budget (2012/13) — were identified by FE Week as at risk.

These were run by the 14 awarding bodies the agency named as yet to sign the PLR agreement.

They included the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII), WSET (Wine and Spirit Education) Awards and the Institute of Commercial Management (ICM).

A spokesperson for CII, whose qualifications include a level three certificate in equity release and a level four diploma in regulated financial planning, said: “The vast majority of our students do not fit the standard model of being on FE courses with training providers drawing down government funding.

“Going forward, we will continue to keep the issue of signing up to the PLR under review.”

Nobody from WSET Awards, whose qualifications include a level one award in spirits and a level three award in wines and spirits, was available for comment.

A spokesperson for ICM said: “The majority of our 700-plus approved centres are overseas with less than 10 per cent of centres based in the UK.

“The process of gaining recognition of our courses also involves gaining external support from the university sector rather than from the more traditional sources, for example from Sector Skills Councils.

“And our understanding is that the majority of funding is now available at the lower levels — predominantly levels one and two — and ICM offers the majority of our qualifications at levels four and above.”

 

Government reveals plans for traineeships

Plans for a new training scheme to equip young people with the “confidence, skills and experience needed to find work” has been announced.

FE minister Matthew Hancock today revealed a potential traineeship model, which could be in place by September 2013, and would see 16 to 24-year-olds not in education or struggling to find work complete “flexible and tailor-made” work preparation sessions, a high-quality work placement and help if they have not achieved a GCSE grade C in English and maths.

It was in June 2012, at the CBI Jobs Summit, that the government first referred to plans to pilot traineeships for “the teenagers who aren’t ready for an apprenticeship”. The Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, said then that “more detail will be coming soon”. Click here for the speech.

Mr Hancock is now urging employers and training providers to help shape the initiative’s progression by giving their opinions on the plans.

The discussion document (click here to download) asks 12 questions about what a traineeship programme for 16-18 year-olds on study programmes, and the young unemployed (19-24 year-olds), should look like.

Source: Traineeships discussion paper, page 12

More than 500 people have registered to attend an FE Week  ministerial webinar with Mr Hancock from 2.40pm to 3.10pm today, with participants encouraged to pose questions and hear the minister’s views on the plan for traineeships. Register here. “We want to support everyone in our country to reach their personal best,” said Mr Hancock.

“To do that, we are introducing traineeships to help young people with the skills they need to get a job, and hold down a job.

“That’s vital for our economy to compete in the global race. And it’s a question of fairness. Traineeships will give young people the helping hand and experience they need to compete for apprenticeships and good jobs.”

The Department for Education (DfE) devised an outline for traineeships, expected to last around six months, after a CBI annual education and skills survey showed that almost two-thirds – 61 per cent – of employers thought many young people lacked “work related skills and attitudes which they needed to sustain employment”.

We have been arguing for some time for a pre-Apprenticeship ‘offer’ to young people”

The DfE said in the third quarter of 2012 there were 206,000 16 to 18-year-olds and 821,000 19 to 24-year-olds not in education, employment or training (NEET) and evidence showed these young people are more likely than their peers to suffer unemployment, low pay, poor health and depression.

Professor Alison Wolf wrote a report for the government on the subject which said young people “move in and out of education and short-term employment churning between the two in an attempt to find either a course which offers a real chance for progress, or a permanent job, and finding neither.”

Graham Hoyle, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, said: “The development of traineeships represents a hugely significant step forward in ensuring young people currently without a job or training opportunity are better equipped to find either an Apprenticeship or other type of worthwhile employment.”

Martin Doel, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said: “We have been arguing for some time for a pre-Apprenticeship ‘offer’ to young people, a mixture of training and work experience that makes them attractive to employers and competitive for Apprenticeships or for other jobs with training. We therefore welcome this consultation and the thinking that underlies the questions that it poses.”

The government said its aim was to make traineeships the “preferred route for young people who aspire to apprenticeships or other jobs who needed additional training to reach their goals.”

Intensive traineeships are also being proposed for those with no work experience and very few qualifications.

Traineeships for 16 to 19-year-olds are proposed as part of Study Programmes and for 19 to 24-year-olds training providers will be able to make use of the Adult Skills Budget.

The document states: “You can join the discussion by sending your views to traineeships.discussion@education.gsi.gov.uk” by February 8.”