Beatrix Groves, president, Institute for Learning

“I did it all back to front, upside-down and mostly part-time,” says Institute for Learning (IfL) president Beatrix Groves, known to friends as Bea, on how she ended up with a degree and a career in teaching.

She came to the profession late, having “absolutely detested” the Catholic single sex secondary school she attended, where discipline ruled. Despite doing well in her O levels, she left as soon she as she could, joining the civil service as a record branch clerk.

While she hated working at the local social security office, updating national insurance records and authorising benefit payments, there was no question of changing path. The DHSS was one of the biggest employers on the Tyneside estate where she lived, and besides — having not enjoyed school — the idea of continuing her education seemed like “a ridiculously stupid idea.”

But being laid off by the civil service in the mid 1980s, and becoming one of “Mrs Thatcher’s great four million,” unemployed, came as a shock and Groves spent the next five years in and out (and it was mostly out) of work. While she was determined not to fall into the trap of “getting up late, swanning around the house and going back to bed again,” the experience was dispiriting. “I always assumed, as I was always told at school, that if I got my O levels, I’d be fine,” she recalls. “But that wasn’t the case at all; no matter how well-qualified you were it didn’t mean you were immune from unemployment.”

At the same time, she was struggling with issues in her personal life. Born male, but having felt, since childhood, that she was meant to be female, Groves had started dressing as a woman in secret, but the pretence was starting to take its toll. “It’s a bit like knowing you are left-handed but someone has told you to be right-handed and you’re scared to use your left hand so you carry on using your right until it gets to the point where it’s driving you crazy,” she says.

Discovering the Workers Educational Association (WEA) — the UK’s largest voluntary-sector provider of adult education — helped enormously. Having been picked on constantly at school for being ‘different,’ Groves learnt that education didn’t necessarily have to be “hostile” and that – much to her surprise – people were actually interested in what she had to stay.

Evening classes in music appreciation led to a teaching qualification at North Tyneside College, and by the middle of the 1990s, Groves had a string of qualifications (including a first class degree in education and philosophy) and a flourishing portfolio career in teaching, which typically meant juggling at least half a dozen contracts at different institutions, at any one time.

I couldn’t carry on pretending for the rest of my life”

Groves set up the Association of Part Time Tutors (APTT) in 1995 and (while admitting to being a “former sceptic”), joined the IfL a decade later – just before membership became compulsory  on the basis that “it was better to be looking out than looking in.”

One of the things that motivated her to stand for its council — and later IfL president — was her decision, in 2008, to ‘come out’ in women’s clothing. “I remember looking at myself in the mirror and thinking to myself, ‘I can’t carry on pretending for the rest of my life.’ I don’t think it was me saying to myself that I had to be a woman from now on, it was more that I couldn’t keep it a secret any more. I couldn’t keep on lying on a constant basis.”

While confronting years of secrecy and telling her family, friends and partner, initially drove her into depression, it has proved a positive move in the long-term. For around a year, she dressed in women’s clothing some of the time (and usually only in informal circumstances), and in 2009, made the decision to “go full-time.”

But going to employers — and there were over a dozen of them, all with varying levels of commitment to their equality and diversity policies — wasn’t easy. “Some of them [her employers] hadn’t got a clue how to deal with it because they just didn’t see it coming, which is alarming to a certain extent,” says Groves. “For some it was a big rigmarole and for some it was, ‘Oh, you’ve got to meet with the chief executive and talk this through.’ Some were better than others but at the end of the day it proved that mostly the bureaucracy worked alright. Mostly.”

Telling students was far easier; having planned to return to work as Bea (Groves was previously known as Bob) after the summer holiday, she found most students were completely unfazed.” I thought when I turned up for the first session I would have no-one in my class and my career would be over,” she recalls. “And it didn’t happen. In fact, I’ve discovered that 99 per cent of adult students I come across are just as nice to me today as they ever were and just take me as they come. They’re concerned with how good I am at teaching them, not what I am wearing…but I’m still astonished every time I come in. Four years on, every time I do, I think ‘I must be doing something right.’”

Her decision to stand as IfL president was driven at least in part, by a desire to show that “trans people could do anything,” she says. And having gone in “with reform in mind,” member voice has been a key priority, particularly around the issue of micro-management. “Everything is standardised and templated and conforms to a policy somewhere along the line which means that the levels of professionalism have shrunk dramatically…but if the IFL wants to make its members become more professional we can only do that if we can do something about micro management – and that is incredibly difficult in a land where Ofsted rules,” she says.

The benefits of uniformity have “strangled the possibility of individual identity and action,” she says – an issue she feels strongly about, both in her personal and professional life. “I’m not dressing like this for amusement. It is an expression of identity…which is about valuing people’s contributions, their own ways of doing things, respecting who they are and looking at the positive aspects of what they can contribute…I have taught in so many different places, met so many different people, and worked with so many different organisations over the years and then there is the whole business with having to struggle with gender identity… my assumption is that people say, ‘She’s been through the mill, she must know what she is talking about.’”

It’s a personal thing

What’s your favourite book? 

Eagle in the Snow, by Wallace Breem

What did you want to be when you were younger?

A train driver – don’t all kids of my generation?

What do you do to switch off from work?

Go comatose in front of the TV

If you could invite anyone to a dinner party, living or dead, who would it be?

Ludwig Wittgenstein

What would your super power be? 

Telepathy

Call for education to ‘split’ at 14

Former education secretary and father of the national curriculum Lord Baker has called for a back-to-basics revamp of England’s education system.

The Conservative peer outlined his view that 14-year-olds were given the choice of four pathways at separate institutions in his new book 14 – 18: A New Vision for Secondary Education.

These are liberal arts for academic subjects, technical for specialisms such as engineering, sports and creative arts, or a career course where students would specialise in subjects such as plumbing or catering at FE colleges.

“I think there should be an assessment at 14 to see where your interests lie and the student, with input from parents and teachers, should say which direction they want to take,” Lord Baker, founder of University Technical Colleges (UTCs), told FE Week.

He said more emphasis should be put into developing technical and career skills and the different colleges that would develop under his vision would work to get employers on-board to provide work placements and universities to inspire credibility.

In a year when the government has raised the school leaver age to 17 rising to 18 by 2015, and with FE colleges given the go ahead to recruit directly from schools from the age of 14, he said he felt the FE sector needed to “specialise more” and to stop trying to cater for “such a huge range”.

“I think colleges need a basic reform — I’m a great fan of them but their strength is in selling courses — very few attempt to round an education,” said Lord Baker, adding that the national curriculum should stop at 14 with pupils continuing to study core subjects such as English and maths until they were 18.

“One of the problems with FE colleges is they try to cater for such a huge range of activity. I think they should specialise more.”

He also warned of the “dangers” of FE colleges recruiting pupils at 14.

“I think the danger is every secondary head in the country will recommend their most difficult students to FE colleges,”
he said.

“I think that’s already happening because the policy of government is to squeeze vocational qualifications out of pre-16 education.”

He also conceded the age of 14 could be seen as too young to specialise, but said that in Austria, where specialisms are followed at the age of 14, there was some of the “lowest youth unemployment in the world”.

“This is merely the starting point. I hope I’ve started a great debate but it’ll be up to someone else to pick up the baton and run with it,” said former Home Secretary Lord Baker.

Maggie Galliers, Association of Colleges president, said Lord Baker’s book was “useful” for a “push for a higher status technical route,” but urged caution over its recommendations because it gave no mention of costs.

Lord Baker’s book, 14-18: A New Vision for Secondary Education, is priced at £14.99 and was released on Thursday, January 24.

Redefine apprenticeships, says thinktank

Apprenticeships should be redefined as “intensive three-year training programmes” to help curb the 31 per cent A-levels drop-out rate, new research revealed.

The Policy Exchange thinktank released a report with several recommendations and said there needed to be “a clear alternative route offering high quality technical or vocational provision”. It named apprenticeships as a “key part” of this.

The report, written by Dr Owen Corrigan, said taxpayers lose around £300m a-year with a third of A-level students dropping out when “vocationally-oriented programmes of study may have been more suitable for them”.

And skills gaps affected one-in-five businesses with technical holes being found in more than 50 per cent of those workplaces. Fifty two per cent of employers anticipated difficulties filling roles in science technology engineering and mathematics in the next three years.

“This report advances the case for building a high quality technical and vocational route through the education system from 14 to 19 as an alternative to traditional academic education,” said the report.

“To guarantee its brand and desirability as a progression destination, and to stimulate more employers to offer this type of training, apprenticeships should be redefined in stronger and clearer terms as an intensive three-year training programme with significant educational and workplace learning requirements.”

The report makes 22 recommendations, including that an element of payment-by-results was reintroduced to “ensure all providers help learners make the right decisions and encourage them to achieve”.

FE Minister Matthew Hancock said: “We strongly agree that vocational education needs transforming for young people to succeed in today’s job market.

“That’s why we have such a vigorous reform programme. We are reforming apprenticeships, introducing traineeships and overhauling the system to recognise only high quality vocational courses that lead directly to a skilled trade or profession.”

Shadow Education Secretary Stephen Twigg said: “Britain risks losing the global race on skills. We need to be as strong as Germany and Switzerland on vocational education, and as competitive as Singapore and Japan on maths.”

Nevertheless, Dr Corrigan’s report also called for a stronger inspection of technical courses by Ofsted and the establishment of a dedicated vocational commissioning body to sit within the Department for Education (DfE) – planning better provision for these subjects.

He said university technical colleges (UTCs) and employment-focused studio schools were “reinvigorating the landscape with high levels of employer engagement”.

Technical education providers should document all employer contributions to their curriculum, have their facilities accredited, should be served notices to improve if
they fail to meet quality standards and Ofsted should inspect information, advice
and guidance (IAG) at schools while non-school providers should be incentivised to produce IAG.

Achievement rates for all 16 to 19 providers should be included in the annual DfE performance tables and the report backed plans for a TechBacc qualification to reward students taking high-quality vocational courses alongside core academic skills.

Critics hit out at A-level reform plans

FE groups across the sector have condemned education secretary Michael Gove’s proposal to overhaul A-levels.

Mr Gove said from 2015 pupils will take exams at the end of two-year courses with AS-levels remaining but as stand-alone exams. A group of leading universities will play a bigger role in maintaining standards.

But various teaching associations and unions have rejected his proposals, with the University and College Union (UCU) saying it “entrenched elitism” into the education system making A levels “simply about university entrance”.

UCU general secretary, Sally Hunt, said: “In the absence of good alternative qualifications young people will feel they have to continue with A-levels and many will fail.

“The secretary of state appears driven to replicate his own schooldays for all. While that era and set of qualifications may have suited him very well, they will not satisfy the varied needs of today’s pupils.”

Motivations for the move emerged in a letter to exam regulator Ofqual. Mr Gove said A-levels in their current form did not help students to develop a “deep understanding” of their subjects. Instead modular units will be scrapped, with the qualification returning to exams taken at the end of a two-year course.

Julian Gravatt, assistant chief executive of the Association of Colleges (AoC), said in FE and sixth form colleges there was “overwhelming support” for the retention of an AS/A2 structure because of the role that AS levels have in “bridging the gap” from GCSEs and in informing university admissions officers and employers.

The Department for Education has given Ofqual and awarding organisations an extra year to develop the new A-level qualifications but AoC said they were “concerned” that there appeared to be a plan to introduce new subjects in stages which “will cause confusion for students” starting sixth form in 2015.

Mr Gravatt added: “There is a question of whether the department will be providing sufficient funding to enable schools and colleges to teach a broader, harder set of qualifications.”

Toni Fazaeli, chief executive of The Institute for Learning (IfL) said: “We are concerned about reforms that remove the freedom for professional teachers to exercise their judgement about the most appropriate form of assessment for their learners, which will differ by subject.”

IfL also said they feared exams at the end of two years, without modular assessment or the ability to retake assessments, would “narrow participation” at A level and have a “damaging effect” on learner retention and achievement.

“What flexibility will there be for those who have missed periods of education through difficult circumstances – illness, disability or caring for a family member?”

Brian Lightman of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) said: “This is a classic case of fixing something that isn’t broken.”

Dr Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers & Lecturers (ATL), said: “Michael Gove misses the point that only a very elite group of students benefited from an intensive regime that determined their future on the results of one set of exams.”

Contract suspended after ‘missing data’

A troubled provider’s £4.5m contract with the Skills Funding Agency has been suspended after “errors and missing data” were uncovered in its learner paperwork.

Mymar Training Limited, which has indicated plans to close having failed to “secure sufficient funds for the future,” gave the agency incomplete and incorrect funding claims.

The agency said the problem could amount to a breach of contract and warned the firm, based in Plymouth, that it could be asked to pay back taxpayers’ money.

Mymar’s problems come less than a month after sister firm Walwyn Trust went into administration.

A joint statement from the agency and National Apprenticeship Service (NAS) said: “We have worked extensively with Mymar Training Limited to try to develop a quality apprenticeship programme that meets our statutory standards and offers a good experience for apprentices.

“The agency has been informed by Mymar that it was unable to secure sufficient funds for the future and therefore has announced its planned closure.

“The agency has been in discussion with Mymar as sufficient evidence to support errors and missing data in their funding claims hadn’t been received by the agency.

“The agency has suspended all future payments until sufficient evidence is received by the agency.

“If this evidence is not received, this constitutes a breach of contract.

“The agency will seek to recover any funding that is found to have not been delivered in accordance with contractual requirements.”

Mymar’s phoneline goes to answerphone and FE Week was unable to contact its chief executive who according to LinkedIn, has been Bill Haynes since September 2011. The website also listed him as current chairman of Ekode Holdings and former chief executive of Verridian PLC.

An email on Thursday, January 17, leaked to FE Week by a former Mymar employee, that appears to be from Mr Haynes, said Mymar was ceasing trading with “immediate effect” and that staff would not be paid.

It added: “Sadly and surprisingly we heard yesterday that the SFA were no longer willing to support our position and withdrew the financial support plan, thereby effectively removing our total income by clawing back the entire payment due for the month, consequently rendering the business insolvent.

“The money received from investors is simply not enough and without the support of an SFA plan for structured repayment we are unable to attract more.”

The correspondence drew a strong response from the agency whose joint statement with NAS said: “The responsibility for ensuring Mymar meets its obligations to employees rests solely with the company itself and any suggestion the failure to pay staff is due to agency actions is entirely refuted.”

It added: “We have written to learners to advise that we are working to place them with alternative providers, and where necessary employers, so they can complete their learning.

“NAS is using its apprenticeship vacancies system to help find quality opportunities for those who were on an apprenticeship programme with Mymar and Walwyn Trust.

“The agency will be arranging the collection of all learner portfolios from Mymar.

“Any concerned apprentices, parents or guardians can contact the agency’s e-mail address: mymar@skillsfundingagency.bis.gov.uk

“For any enquiries regarding any payments due, learners, parents and guardians are encouraged to contact their local Job Centre Plus.”

AoC in India : Down to business

The AoC India UK delegation arrived safely in New Delhi by early evening yesterday, just in time for the first official meeting of the programme.

The programme kicked off with an introduction to Sannam S4, who have been appointed by AoC India to manage the market entry of member colleges in India.

From left: Edward Dixon, Chief Operating Officer, Adrian Mutton, Chief Executive Officer, John Philip, Country Adviser for Aoc In India (and holding this week’s edition of FE Week), Cindrela Arthur, Head of Events, Lakshmi Iyer, Head of Education, Tanushree Ray, Office Manager, Krishna Kumar, Head of Research and Partnerships (and Head of Skills Sector)

Sannam S4 are a “specialist, single-window provider of market entry and business development services in India.” Their client list ranges from several UK universities to multi-national organisations such as T K Maxx and Unilever. The meeting for many was an opportunity to finally meet with the organisation and its staff that will play a critical role in the success of AoC India.

Before a tour of the offices that Sannam S4 will provide AoC India to operate from, we were given an introduction to Sannam S4 and an overview of the “high-level” strategy for AoC India.

500 million will need equipping with skills over the next five years.”

Whilst member colleges have committed to invest in this project, and have now appointed an indian based organisation to assist. One of the biggest challenges appears to be the flexibility of the UK Border Agency and the development of a sound product offer from the UK.

From left: Sunaina Mann, Principal of North East Surrey College of Technology (NESCOT), Andy Wilson, Principal of Wesminster Kingsway College, Sudeshna Chatterjee, Director of South Asia Development at Bournville College, Sue Rimmer, Principal of South Thames College, Clive Hill, Executive Director of Birmingham Metropolitan College, Shane Mann, reporting for FE Week and John Mountford, International Director for the AoC

During the Q&A it became clear that the principals in the room were far from underestimating the challenge of establishing an Indian operation.

The AoC in India delegation pose for a group shot at the Sannam S4 office

Following the introductory meeting it was time for dinner. Many had not had a proper nights sleep for a good couple of days, but it was time to feast on some real Indian food – there was no Chicken Tikka Masala in sight at this restaurant and even the Butter Chicken had a spicy kick to it.

I sat with the CEO of Sannam S4, Adrian Mutton, over dinner and discussed with him the challenges that the UK FE sector faces over the coming few years. Adrian was very clear that the potential revenue generation for colleges is huge.

We continued our conversations over breakfast this morning, it allowed me to probe furthermore about the Indian offer and how business is conducted.

Interview this morning with Adrian Mutton, CEO of Sannam S4, at the Taj Mahal Hotel in New Delhi

After finishing this blog post my next task is to digest all of that information and produce an article for the FE Week – AoC in India supplement – sponsored by NOCN.

The “skills gap” in India is more of a canyon than a gap. The UK are way behind in providing vocational education in India. Its time to play catch-up with the likes of Austrlia, USA, Canada and Germany. Its crazy to think that half of the world’s under 28 population are in India- thats 500 million. These 500 million will need equipping with skills over the next five years. If AoC India were to take only one percent of the market, that would mean UK FE colleges training 5 million Indians over the coming years – GULP!

Picture at the top of the page is of me and Nick writing this blog from the Taj Hotel club, which also has a rather stunning view across New Delhi.

The view from 8th floor in the Taj Club, our on location news room whilst in New Delhi

We’ll be conducting interviews with many of the AoC in India delegation from here tonight, so stay tuned.

Union blasts FE loans

The NUS has branded FE loans a “dangerous policy” and raised a number of questions over the new system ahead of its introduction in August.

Its vice president and spokesperson on FE, Toni Pearce, said the new funding system could hit learner numbers.

Ahead of an anti-loans day next month in which the NUS is urging people to write to their MPs on the issue, she warned of a “major impact on apprenticeship uptake,” unease over FE loans among mature students and claimed the new system could affect Muslim learners.

“We think this is a dangerous policy and will have a major impact on apprenticeship uptake,” said Ms Pearce.

“We feel in this instance it is apprentices who are going to get the worst deal as those apprentices over 24 years will be taking out a loan of up to several thousand pounds to effectively work.”

She added: “We are hearing mature students don’t want to take out loans — these are huge amounts of money.

“If I was in their shoes I would be really concerned about the financial implications — it will really difficult for mature students to access further education.”

She said there was no option to take out a loan under Sharia Law, creating a “huge problem of social integration by limiting the number of Muslims getting into further and higher education”.

However, a spokesperson for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) defended the new loans system saying market research showed their “terms and conditions … are positively received”.

The government currently pays 50 per cent of tuition fees for most further education students aged 25 and over who want to study at level 3 (or above) but from this year anyone aged 24 or over will no longer be entitled to this financial contribution.

They will have to pay the full cost – with learners becoming eligible for a loan for 100 per cent of the tuition.

Shadow FE Minister Gordon Marsden has been critical of the fact new system has not been advertised nationally. And, echoing his concerns, Ms Pearce said colleges were in the dark about loans.

“It’s really dangerous to go so blindly into something now without anyone knowing about it,” she said.

The NUS’s anti loans event next month is called the FE Fees Constituency Lobby Day. It takes place on February 8.

“We were successful last year in getting the government to write-off FE loans for people who then go on to study in higher education,” added Ms Pearce.

“The government also pledged an extra £50m to student financial support adults in further education so we are now asking people to again lobby their local constituency politician. This is all part of the same campaign,” said Ms Pearce.

A BIS spokesperson said: “Students, including apprentices will not be expected to pay anything up front for their course and will only repay their loan once they have completed the course and are earning above £21,000. Market research shows that the terms and conditions of 24+ Advanced Learning Loans are positively received. It also shows that the quality of the course and the future benefits to the individual are the most important factors when deciding to invest in training.”

Careers advice ‘getting worse,’ warns government education committee

The quality and quantity of young people’s career advice is not good enough and is getting worse, a government review has found.

A “deterioration” in guidance since the service became the responsibility of schools in September was identified by the Education Select Committee, whose report on careers guidance was released today.

The committee chair, Graham Stuart MP, questioned the advice of schools who, he said, “put their own interests ahead of that of their pupils, restrict access to other education providers and make the filling of their sixth form places more of a priority than their statutory duty to provide independent and impartial advice and guidance for pupils.”

We have concerns about the consistency, quality, independence and impartiality of careers guidance now being offered to young people”

The review, announced in June, looked at how careers guidance was affected by the Education Act 2011.

The Act saw provision of the service shift from the duty of local authorities, delivered by Connexions, to schools.

“We have concerns about the consistency, quality, independence and impartiality of careers guidance now being offered to young people,” said the committee report, which referred to the transfer of responsibility for careers guidance to schools as “regrettable”.

“We heard evidence that there is already a worrying deterioration in the overall level of provision for young people.

“Urgent steps need to be taken by the government to ensure that young people’s needs are met.

“Too many schools lack the skills, incentives or capacity to fulfil the duty put upon them without a number of changes being made.

“Young people deserve better than the service they are likely to receive under the current arrangements.”

The committee heard from a number of education sector big-hitters, including FE Minister Matthew Hancock and Dr Deirdre Hughes, chair of the National Careers Council, who said there was a potential loss of £28bn to the UK economy if young people were not given the right career guidance.

Mr Stuart MP said: “We found that the quality and quantity of guidance for young people is deteriorating just when it is most needed.

“We want face-to-face guidance to be available to all young people as an integral part of a good quality careers service. They deserve and should receive far better support than current arrangements generally allow.”

He also called for the National Careers Service (NCS), which he described as “a great innovation for adults,” to be extended to support schools.

“The NCS must also be adequately funded to deliver this critical service for young people. Schools can’t simply be left to get on with it,” added Mr Stuart, who called for schools to produce annual careers plans to “ensure they can be held accountable for what they do”.

See the next edition of FE Week for reaction to the education committee’s findings.

Government plans new team to exploit international education opportunities

During a trip to India to promote vocational education the Skills Minister has announced that the government will establish a 10 person team in Westminster to ‘capatalise on the growth of demand for UK education from abroad.’

The Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) announcement comes ahead of the government’s education sector industrial strategy due to be published in early 2013.

Matthew Hancock said: “It is essential that we realise the potential of the largely untapped resource that is our education exports. There is a fast-growing demand for high-quality education, and we are lucky to have a dynamic and entrepreneurial sector that is well placed to contribute.

Education UK will specifically target fast-growing markets such as India and the Middle East”

“We are in a global race and other countries are presenting attractive and co-ordinated offers, so Education UK is a vital step in bringing together the UK sector to drive its international engagement, particularly on high-value opportunities.”

The  press release goes on to say: “Education UK will specifically target fast-growing markets such as India and the Middle East. The UK has an excellent reputation for education internationally, but isn’t currently exploiting this to the full.

“Education UK will work on:

  • Researching, identifying and helping to develop trading opportunities for UK exports
  • Supporting UK providers to respond effectively to targeted international opportunities, by fostering the development of UK consortia for specific opportunities and helping them to prepare and promote bids
  • Ensuring large-scale complex commercial opportunities, which the UK is not currently well-equipped to respond to, are effectively pursued so UK organisations win the business.”

Education UK is a joint BIS and United Kingdom Trade & Investment (UKTI) initiative and the 10 person team will be based at 1 Victoria Street in London.

The FE Week team is ‘on location’ in India, and our blog can be followed and read here.