Response to careers guidance ‘disappoints’

The Association of Colleges is “disappointed” by the government’s response to the education select committee’s report on careers advice in schools.

The report, published last Monday, concluded that the quality of advice had deteriorated since schools took over provision from local authorities and Connexions last September, a move it called “regrettable”.

In its response, the government argued that the changes needed more time to “bed in and evolve” as the committee’s inquiry was conducted after the new system had only been in place for one term.

The association’s director of education policy, Joy Mercer, said: “We can understand why the government’s response . . .  is one of ‘wait and see’ at this early stage . . . but are disappointed that it did not take some of its practical advice to make careers guidance truly available to all young people.”

She pointed to the committee’s suggestion that all schools should publish and review their careers plan each year, a move the government rejected as it “would re-introduce bureaucracy of the kind we have tried so hard to remove”.

Since taking over the responsibility for careers advice, many schools have been accused of restricting advice on other FE providers and filling their own sixth forms.

Ms Mercer said: “The government needs to find new ways of encouraging co-operation between all the providers, schools and colleges, and the labour market, to ensure that the best interests of young people and adults are the primary aim.”

The government response said it was concerned to ensure schools acted impartially and had highlighted the need for schools to work with other providers in the careers statutory guidance.

“This is so important to our economy that there need to be clear incentives,” said Ms Mercer. The UK has a major youth unemployment problem and our concern is that Government is not acknowledging that careers advice is unsatisfactory, and isn’t recognising the mismatch in what parents and school teachers believe employers want from young recruits.”

An Ofsted review of careers guidance is due to be reported in the summer. The government said it would consider the committee report alongside Ofsted’s findings and those of the National Careers Council, “rather than rushing into any immediate changes at a time when schools are still evolving their careers programmes to best meet their new responsibilities”.

Ms Mercer said the association also awaited the Ofsted review, but renewed its January call for the inspectorate to examine careers advice during its routine inspections of schools.

Having consulted Ofsted, the committee found the current inspection framework was “not a credible accountability check on the provision of careers guidance by individual schools”.

The government response said careers guidance was an important area for Ofsted, and added: “Ofsted will draw on the findings of the thematic survey and will consider if any changes are required to its inspection frameworks.”

Fears eased on funding

The Association for Employment and Learning Providers has secured access to extra funding for independent providers whose allocations have been drastically cut.

The association said it had “intense discussions” with the Education Funding Agency (EFA) after dozens of worried members made contact when their allocations were reduced between 20 and 30 per cent. The cuts followed a change in the funding mechanism.

The Department for Education (DfE) has now agreed to provide extra money for providers who had more learners than predicted this year.

Paul Warner, the association’s director of employment and skills (pictured right), said: “The latest commitments from the EFA to reward providers for strong performance are a real step forward from where we were a month ago.”

Previously, funding calculations were made on a per qualification basis, using providers’ predictions of how many students they would recruit. Under the new mechanism, they will be worked out on a per student basis, using the previous year’s intake.

The association estimated that of the independent providers who got in touch, around two-thirds experienced average cuts of 20 to 30 per cent. About a third were not adversely affected or got a modest rise.

In a letter to Graham Hoyle, the association’s chief executive, the funding agency’s national director for children and young people, Peter Mucklow, said it was predicted that this measure would reduce under-delivery “significantly”.

A DfE spokesperson said: “Our reforms will mean that the amount of funding a provider receives will be based on the number of students they’ve actually recruited in previous years, rather than over-optimistic projections.

“We are also giving more funding to private sector providers and charities who recruit more students than planned so that they can meet the needs of all young people.”

The association’s Countdown newsletter reported that the amount put aside to fund potential growth was more than was needed for the whole of last year, meaning that “whilst this is, as ever, subject to affordability . . . high-performing providers can have a degree of confidence that over-performance will be funded”.

It added that it was hoped the new funding formula would also help to prevent clawbacks at the end of the year, instead freeing up the funding of over-delivery as the year progressed.

The DfE also said that the former funding system had “acted as a perverse incentive for schools to enter students for easier qualifications” and that funding providers per student “will free them up to deliver demanding and innovative courses”.

Questions remain on Tech Bacc

Government plans for a Technical Baccalaureate (Tech Bacc) have received a lukewarm welcome from the FE sector, amid questions about its substance and timing.

The Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) and the Association of Colleges (AoC) described the new qualification, which will count towards college and sixth form league tables, as “a step in the right direction” towards raising the profile of vocational education.

To complete a Tech Bacc, learners would need a “high quality” level three vocational qualification, a core maths level three qualification, which would include AS -level maths, and an extended written project.

A government statement said that a list of approved vocational qualifications would be released near the end of the year, with further details on the maths element “in due course”.

The Tech Bacc will be introduced for courses beginning in September next year, but will not count towards performance tables until January 2017.

Brian Lightman, ASCL general secretary, said it could redress the imbalance between academic and vocational courses, but warned that introducing it as a performance indicator, rather than as a specific qualification, risked undermining its credibility.

“What we need is not a vocational alternative to university, but a genuine baccalaureate that encompasses a legitimate set of qualifications in their own right that can provide parallel routes to excellence leading to careers, further qualifications or higher education for students of all abilities,” he said.

“This is the way we will start to break down the false divide between academic and vocational qualifications that is so damaging to our economy.”

Deborah Ribchester, AoC senior policy manager, said: “We fear the September 2014 timetable for the introduction of this new performance measure may be too tight and are concerned that not all of the three key elements proposed have yet been finalised.”

Dr Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, agreed, adding that it was “worrying” that vocational and academic qualifications would continue to be separate.

She also called for the Tech Bacc to be allocated UCAS points, to create parity with A-levels for learners wanting to go to university.

Lynne Sedgmore, executive director of the 157 Group, said the new qualification represented a step towards ensuring vocational qualifications and A-levels were valued equally.

Chris Jones, chief executive at City & Guilds, which is updating its own trademarked TechBac qualification that it offered in the early 1990s, said: “It is essential that we provide young people with another option to a purely academic education. We need to equip them with both the vocational and rounded skills that employers need.”

Featured image caption: An FE Week cartoon from December when Labour accused the government of stealing its plans for a Tech Bacc

‘I had my medal when I heard the noise’

As Elaine Battson collected her bag after a successful Boston Marathon, she thought the explosions she heard were fireworks to celebrate the end of the event.

But within minutes, the Institute for Learning’s director of finance discovered that the April 8 event had been bombed.

“I’d gone through the finishing line, got my medal and was waiting at a baggage place when I heard the noises. I turned around to see smoke coming from down the same road as me,” she told FE Week.

“I got chatting to a man who told me what had happened, that it was definitely a bomb. I felt freaked — it was just unbelievable.”

As the story of the co-ordinated blasts that claimed the lives of three and seriously injured more than 100 was relayed across the globe, the 47-year-old  avid runner who has completed 74 marathons in a decade, made her way back to her hotel.

Initially she hadn’t noticed that anything was different.

However, it soon became obvious that people were looking “more worried than they should be”.

“There were suddenly lots of police and army around. They were shutting shops and everything was closing — it was all anyone was talking about,” she said.

“The hotel staff just tied to look after us and keep us going.”

She didn’t feel scared — even though she was in the city on her own — but she did sleep fully clothed and with a packed suitcase next to her bed in case she was forced to evacuate in the middle of the night.

I turned around to see smoke coming from down the same road as me”

“People back home were more worried than I was — around 20 got in touch to check I was OK,” said Ms Battson, a member of Hackney’s Victoria Park Harriers running club who has completed 24 marathons in the past year.

She flew home the next day having spent the rest of her time in Boston in her hotel room watching the news. But she will return.

“It’s such a great place to visit. I’m determined to return to show some support for the city,” she said.

And the incident hasn’t deterred her from her aim of completing 100 marathons, with this month’s London marathon the most recent under her belt.

She said: “London was very special — lots of people were showing their support for those in Boston. They were wearing black ribbons and t-shirts saying: ‘For Boston’.”

Restaurant worker Krystle Campbell, 29, Chinese graduate student Lu Lingzi, 23, and eight-year-old Martin Richard died in the bombings.

Brothers Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, who originate from Chechnya, are believed to be responsible. The 19-year-old was captured after a huge manhunt in which his elder brother died.

He faces one count of using a weapon of mass destruction and one count of malicious destruction of property resulting in death.

Featured image caption: Elaine Battson, director of finance at IfL, at the Boston marathon finishing line just moments before the bombs went off

Minister ‘cancels’ on traineeships

Providers have been kept waiting at least another week for the government to outline its plan for traineeships.

Skills Minister Matthew Hancock had been advertised as attending an event in Manchester on Wednesday, April 24, at which he would unveil the scheme. But the launch was cancelled at the 11th hour.

Traineeships, due to start next academic year, were proposed by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg in June to help young people gain work-related skills and attitudes.

Mr Hancock was unable to attend the Manchester launch, which was pencilled in just as youth unemployment figures nudged the one million mark.

A spokesperson for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said the minister’s attendance at the event had never been confirmed.

She said he had pulled out after he had been called to an “unrelated meeting at No 10”.

The event, organised by the UK Commission for Employment and Skills, went ahead without the minister, but pressure is mounting within the FE sector for an announcement on traineeships.

Figures released this month by the Office for National Statistics showed that 979,000 16 to 24-year-olds were out of work in the three months from December to February, a 20,000 increase on the three months from September to November.

Shadow Skills Minister Gordon Marsden said: “It is deeply concerning that the government still hasn’t launched the final proposals for its traineeships programme, not least given it is now 11 months since Nick Clegg first announced the policy.

“This month’s rise in youth unemployment further underlines the importance of the government getting this policy right.

“FE colleges and training providers need urgent clarity if they are expected to deliver this new provision come September.”

A spokesperson at the Department for Education said the launch would take place “shortly”.

“We received an excellent response to the discussion paper we published in January, with more than 450 responses from employers, providers and other organisations,” he said.

“We are continuing to work through the final details of the traineeships programme, drawing on all of these helpful responses. We will publish further information about the programme shortly.”

Principal defiant after Ofsted grade four

Third poor inspection for City College Coventry’s Paul Taylor

The principal of the latest big city college to be labelled inadequate by Ofsted has told of his determination to stay on and “put things right”.

After 16 years in the job and two previous poor inspections, Paul Taylor, at City College Coventry, was hit with the grade four result across each inspection headline field.

The 8,000-learner college was also given grade fours throughout the main findings board, including apprenticeships and 19+ learning programmes.

It got grade three overall results at previous inspections in March 2010 and May 2007, but its highest mark this time was a single grade two for teaching, learning and assessment on independent living and life skills.

“I’ve thought long and hard about what’s happened,” said Mr Taylor (pictured).

“I’ve thought: ‘Shall I go?’. But I couldn’t leave the college with those grades. If I walk away I’ll regret it forever.

“I’m very confident we will put things right. At the end of the day we have to accept where we are and face up to it.”

City College Coventry is the third big city college to have been given a grade four in recent weeks.

Last month, City of Liverpool College got grade fours in every headline inspection field, four years after it was praised as outstanding.

And, more recently, City of Bristol College fell from good to inadequate, with grade fours in all but leadership and management, where it was seen to be in need of improvement.

If I walk away I’ll regret it forever.”

Coventry’s Ofsted report, published on April 23 following inspection in March, was critical of below average achievement, low course completion, poor attendance and punctuality.

It said: “Quality assurance systems are ineffective. They have failed to prevent the decline in success rates and have not brought about the necessary improvements across the college, particularly in teaching, learning and assessment.”

It added: “Leadership and management throughout the college are not effective in bringing about sustained improvement in all areas.”

But Mr Taylor said the inspectors’ final grading was “unexpected” because self-assessment indicated the college would get a grade three overall — and a grade two for teaching, learning and assessment.

“Where we got it really wrong was on teaching, learning and assessment. Our own assessment regime was telling us they were good, so it was quite a severe drop,” he said.

“We assessed standards wrongly because we weren’t focusing enough on the learning aspect.”

However, Mr Taylor said he was implementing changes to improve the college, which, according to agency figures, had a turnover of £20.3m for the year ending July 31, 2011.

One change, a new system to monitor attendance and trigger action to deal with students who did not turn up, was not in place in time for the inspection.  Staff training would also be assessed and addressed, “before the end of June with a view to a clean start in September”, he said.

Mr Taylor added: “Generally we need to tidy up on all our systems and become more consistent and focused. But we don’t just want to implement an action plan — we want to put in place a significant culture change.”

——————————————————————————–

Editorial: Misplaced sentiment

City College Coventry is not the first college to receive a grade four inspection result from Ofsted recently, nor will it be the last.

However, three things make this outcome stand out from the seemingly growing crowd.

Firstly, this was no average grade four. All 16 outcomes in the record of main findings were inadequate.

Secondly, and unlike other overall grade four results, this was not an exceptional result.

The college had already had two poor inspection results.

Thirdly, current principal Paul Taylor has been at the helm for 16 years and during all of those inspections.

So the defence of being new in post is not available for him, unlike principals at other grade four colleges.

But Mr Taylor is staying put because if he walks away he’ll “regret it forever”.

It’s an honourable sentiment, but a misplaced one.

What about the tens of thousands of people in Coventry who over the years, according to Ofsted, have received a less than good educational experience?

Bearing in mind Ofsted boss Sir Michael Wilshaw’s comments about no consequences for failure at FE colleges, and Skills Minister Matthew Hancock’s plans for an axe-wielding FE Commissioner, this latest blow should be seen as a watershed moment for the sector.

What is to be the consequence of what appears repeated failure in leadership at City College Coventry?

Nick Linford, FE Week editor

[download#106]

Michele Sutton, principal, Bradford College

The world of FE is dotted with strong female role models.

There’s Dame Ruth Silver, chair of the Learning and Skills Improvement Service, 157 Group executive director Lynne Sedgmore and, of course, Toni Pearce who has blazed the FE trail to preside over the National Union of Students.

Meanwhile, the Association of Colleges has its third female president, Maggie Galliers — and the story of women at the top will continue after her with Bradford College’s Michele Sutton.

“People often ask what’s helped me” says the college’s principal for the past eight years.

“The support of my family has been really important [she’s a mum-of-two, grandmother-of-two and married to retired chemist Jeff].

“It makes me wonder — am I one of these women who’s had it all? I’ve got a good family life and a good career.”

When Sutton takes up the association’s one-year elected presidency in August, it will be the latest highpoint in a career in which she has repeatedly come out on top. She’s done the work of male bosses without fitting reward or recognition, jumped at the chance to operate in a potentially lethal workplace and more than held her own with big-hitting executives from across the pond.

It all began with a “fancy goods” stall in Doncaster market and two female role models; her grandmother Bertha Smaje and mother Cybil Marcus.

“My mother could sell absolutely anything to anybody. My grandma — she was a formidable lady — was nearly blind, but she’d sit at the end of the stall and direct you to serving people,” says Sutton, 64.

“Throughout my life I’ve seen strong women.”

School too was a female environment as she went to a girls’ grammar. But the local technical college, where she did a secretarial course alongside A-levels and a national diploma in business studies, was far more interesting.

“There was an awful lot of boys there — mining apprentices and apprentices from the big manufacturing industries. For Doncaster, in those days, it looked more interesting than my very staid girls’ grammar,” says Sutton.

Manchester College of Commerce — now Manchester Metropolitan University — was next for a higher national diploma in business studies.

“I ended up in the same economic situation we’ve got today where graduates can’t get a job,” she says.

“I’d had my first child by then and my husband was still a PhD student. We needed money, so I fell back on my secretarial skills.”

A number of secretarial posts followed before a move to Derby with her husband’s first job.

“I got work as a PA to a director of marketing — I mostly did his job and his deputy’s, also a man,” says Sutton.

“I used to think ‘Why am I doing their jobs and I’m called a secretary and not paid very much?’ I wanted to progress because I could see I was better than they were. It was a moment of realisation.”

Despite earlier reservations about teaching, Sutton, by now a mum-of-two, came across an advert for a part-time business studies teacher at Southport College. She got the job and “loved it”.

“My husband then moved to Birmingham with his job and we saw this advert for what was then Handsworth College, now City College Birmingham,” she says.

“I went for interview and all the wiring was out because they’d had a health and safety problem — it was such a mess.

“There was a sense of challenge. It was 90 per cent black and ethnic minority students. But I thought ‘this is somewhere I can make a difference’. I really wanted the job, got it and was there for 14 years.” She started as a full-time lecturer in business studies and ended as vice principal.

It’s at this point that Sutton’s story intertwines with that of arguably the archetypal strong female — Margaret Thatcher.

Following riots in the early 1980s, the then Prime Minister made a tense visit to the college, which had escaped the violence.

If you want to make something happen, then go on and make it happen — don’t wait for everybody else”

“She came, surrounded by security men with guns,” says Sutton, whose Manchester home is shared with Grover — a miniature black and white schnauzer named after late American jazz saxophonist Grover Washington.

“It was a bit uncomfortable because we felt a lot of empathy with our community . . . and her visit was difficult.”

But Handsworth also provided Sutton with her first experience of a female boss in FE.

“Pat Davies was little, formidable and sort of took me on as a protégée,” she says.

“She used to have a hundred good ideas a day that she would ring down to the staffroom. She’d say: ‘Could you pop up here for a moment please?’ And everybody would think: ‘Oh no, what’s she going to ask us now?’

“Some of her ideas were crazy, but some of them we tried and they were innovative. She had ambition, despite the college being in the backstreets of Birmingham.”

Sutton, who was appointed an OBE for services to further education and community cohesion in 2009, adds: “She allowed me to think women could get on and inspired me to think: ‘If you want to make something happen, then go on and make it happen — don’t wait for everybody else.’ You have to believe in yourself and your institution.”

And the institution believed in Sutton, sending her off to the US to do a masters in human resource development.

She says: “It was typically American in that everybody on the course was a vice president from places like Disney, GM, Bank of Nova Scotia — really big names. I turned up from a college in Birmingham thinking: ‘What am I doing here?’

“But it was a fantastic experience. The staff and the students were considered equal and it was all very democratic.”

Sutton, chair of the Leeds City Regional Skills Network and of the West Yorkshire Colleges Consortium, adds: “After that I was ready to be a principal, but I’d been at Handsworth for 14 years and thought wouldn’t somebody say ‘but can you do it somewhere else?’. So I decided to go for a sideways move to what was then Manchester City College.”

She spent five years there as vice principal, before taking over the top job at Rochdale’s Hopwood Hall College in 1999.

In 2004 she took over at Bradford where perhaps one of her biggest hurdles has been to hide a personal smile behind her professional image.

“My husband wanted to continue his education after retiring and so he came here as a student and did a masters in visual arts. We never really met — he had his own gang, women mainly,” she jokes.

“He got on well with the staff and created his own world in art and design. The really weird thing was shaking his hand on the stage when he graduated.”

So college life permeates Sutton family life, but then maybe the fact that she seems to live and breathe FE is the reason she’s the next association president.

“I’m passionate about the value that FE colleges — whatever their size or type — bring to individuals, communities, business and the wider economy,” said Sutton after her election.

But what’s the betting on another strong female role model, elected or appointed, in FE anytime soon?

————————————————————————

It’s a personal thing

What’s your favourite book?
The Secret Garden, by Frances Hodgson Burnett

What did you want to be when you were younger?
A performer in musical theatre

What do you do to switch off from work?
Read, listen to music, take the dog for a walk and spend time with my grandchildren

If you could invite anyone to a dinner party, living or dead, who would it be?
BB King and Boudica

What would your super power be?
Cleaning my house with a snap of my fingers 

A big dip in funding concerns FE leaders

FE bosses have urged the government to address a growing dip in funding for 16 to 19-year-olds that could “stymie” talent.

In a letter to Education Secretary  Michael Gove, leaders of organisations representing heads and college principals claimed that funding will slump from £4,645 for every 16 to 19-year-old in 2011/12 to less than £4,400 by 2015.

Brian Lightman, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), Martin Doel, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, David Igoe, chief executive of the Sixth Form Colleges’ Forum and Nick Lewis, general secretary of Principals Professional Council (PPC) said the cuts could lead to popular subjects being scrapped, increased class sizes and reductions in teaching time, tutorial and pastoral support.

“At a time when the age for participation in education is being raised [to 17 in 2013 and 18 in 2015] and when social mobility is a flagship government policy, it makes no sense for frontline provision to be jeopardised by these funding cuts,” Mr Lightman told FE Week.

“This is why we have written to the Sectary of State urging him to work with us to ensure that the young people in our schools and colleges are not let down, and that these worthwhile policies, which ASCL strongly supports, do not fail.”

We are concerned that the 16 to 19 funding dip could stymie the best endeavours of schools and colleges”

The letter claimed that income per pupil under 16 in secondary schools was £5,620 in 2011/2012 — £1,000 more than for 16 to 19-year-olds — while in the same year the average fee per university student was £8,414.

It warned the disparity would cause “significant and adverse consequences for 16 to 19 education”, and pressed the government to act before the next Comprehensive Spending Review.

It said: “We are concerned that the 16 to 19 funding dip could stymie the best endeavours of schools and colleges to cultivate the potential talents of young people.

“The next comprehensive spending review should re-evaluate the resources needed for a good education for all 16 to 19-year-olds in state education.”

It added: “The 16 to 19 funding dip has appeared as an unwelcome anomaly. An anomaly that we believe should be removed.”

Mike Hopkins, chair of PPC, told FE Week: “This government should demonstrate its dedication and support for skills as a priority by increasing fair funding for all.”

The group said it “welcomed” the opportunity to work with the government in “helping to determine the resources needed to achieve these aims and how these resources are then best deployed”.

A Department for Education spokesperson said the government was spending £7.5 billion this year on education and training for 16-19 year olds.

“Work on the next Spending Review Period is on-going and no decisions have been taken,” said the spokesperson.

“As the participation age increases, we are providing funding to ensure schools and colleges can offer places in education or training to all young people who want them,” she added.