Rushanara Ali, shadow junior education minister

As Rushanara Ali’s staff show me into her parliamentary office, they seem understandably disorientated by her sudden change of focus from international development to education and young people.

But shadow minister Ali is unfazed by the results of Labour’s most recent reshuffle.

She seems to be in her element with her new shadow ministerial brief and once she begins talking on the subject, it’s difficult to interrupt.

She is, she tells me, “completely obsessed” with education’s power to influence social mobility.

The 38-year-old MP for Bethnal Green and Bow credits her own education in London’s East End with her position today.

“I went to some great schools, I was really lucky actually,” she says, looking particularly to her secondary school, Whitechapel’s Mulberry School for Girls.

“The teachers were very, very ambitious for their kids, it was just brilliant.

“They had a very strong sense that it didn’t matter what your background was, you could go anywhere if you put the work in and if you were ambitious and determined.”

The first Bangladesh-born person to enter UK parliament, Ali came to England when she was six.

“I remember it being grey and cold,” she says.

At college you get a real insight into the different points people are starting at and where they end up”

“I had a lot of family out there [in Bangladesh] — grandparents, aunts and uncles, a large extended family so arriving here was very different.”

When Ali’s family moved to England in the early 1980s, the London Bangladeshi community was less established, making the contrast between her life in Bangladesh and her new life in Tower Hamlets, East London, more apparent.

“If you have an upbringing in a country that’s completely different, childhood memories tend to stick,” she says.

“Like all children you miss where you’ve come from but very quickly you adjust to life.”

Education formed a key part of her family life, as her parents were “very supportive” although in different ways.

“My mother was very, very strict and everything was about studying, whereas my father was much more laid back, his attitude was that you should do what you’re interested in, which was a good balance actually,” explains Ali. “It was very much a case of ‘education, education, education’ from a very early age.

“There was a discipline of not wasting time, so when we arrived in England, as well as going to school, my mother was absolutely obsessed with us learning Arabic, English and Bengali — she had her programme and she was determined we would get through the education system and there was no getting away from her.

“All the hours would be taken up in some form of education — in the weekday evenings, it was school and then it was more classes.”

Grinning broadly, and clearly not resenting the time dedicated to her education, she adds: “I think the only playtime we had was on a Saturday and Sunday afternoon, it was pretty intense.

“So I credit my education and pathway to both my parents, but particularly my mother because she was determined that all her children but particularly her daughters, got a good education.

“But she probably didn’t know what she was getting herself into when I stood for parliament.”

Ali went on to study at Tower Hamlets College where she returned to become a governor before she was nominated to stand for election in 2010, and this, she says has made her “a passionate advocate of the FE system”.

“When I got to Tower Hamlets College, I was meeting a lot of people who’d gone back to college as mature students,” she says.

“So that was a really powerful influence for me because if you’re in a school sixth form, you’re with the similar age group, but at college you get a real insight into the different points people are starting at and where they end up.”

She left the East End to study politics, philosophy and economics at St John’s College, Oxford, but returned in her holidays to conduct research for renowned sociologist and social activist Michael Young, talking to youth workers and young people.

On finishing university, Ali found she was drawn towards human rights law, but, not really wanting to study for and also finance a law degree, she instead got a job with the then-MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, Oona King, who was also on the international development select committee.

Now, 15 years on, she has come to occupy that constituency seat herself, something she says she’s “incredibly proud of”.

“It’s hugely exciting, but a big responsibility, I think if it’s your home seat, if it’s the place you grew up in you have a special connection, you know a lot of people in the area,” explains Ali.

“The insights you get from a long span of your lifetime really help you to get across where the blockages are, where the problems occur and how those can be overcome.

“Also, I think what’s great is that when I say to young people ‘I went to your school’ or ‘I went to your college’ it doesn’t feel as detached for them.”Ali, along with fellow Labour politicians Shabana Mahmood and Yasmin Qureshi, was one of the first female Muslim MPs in the UK.

She was also the first person in her family to go to university and the first student from her school to go to Oxford. With so many firsts on her CV, questions about being a ‘role model’ are difficult to avoid.

“I think in terms of when I decided to go to university, it was about what I wanted to do, it wasn’t really about what then it symbolises,” explains Ali.

“But you are very aware, just like women in parliament, the first intake of women in parliament would have been very aware of the fact that there are others who would look to them — that happens.” And, she admits, role models have their place in “demystifying” aspirational places like university or parliament. “Certainly when I went to Oxford, one of my friends went to Cambridge and I think we were probably the only two in the borough who did, and that was important because our teachers could say to their kids ‘you should not see Cambridge and Oxford and all the Russell Group universities and so on as places you can’t get to’,” she says.

“That’s why I’m really keen that there are more people from diverse backgrounds who go into politics because then it becomes self-evident, it becomes normal and these places become places that anyone can feel that they can get into if they do the work.”

Perhaps the reason Ali seems so poised to make a smooth transition to her new brief is that she sees them as part of the same continuum of improving people’s lives and social equality.

“A lot of people say this I know, but education really is the key to all the other things that happen in the community or in a country, and that’s certainly what I saw in the east end of London,” she explains.

“For many people, the transformation of education has really transformed their lives. And that’s a very powerful story.”

It’s a personal thing

 

What’s your favourite book?

The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood. It takes me back to my FE College, actually, I had these amazing English literature teachers Mary Jones and Helen Coxidge, and it was brilliantly taught

If you could invite anybody to a dinner part, living or dead, who would it be?

Nelson Mandela

What’s your pet hate?

There are probably lots of things but I can’t think of anything off of the top of my head

What do you do to switch off from work?

Friends, reading novels, family, films — although I rarely get time to go to the cinema now

What did you want to be when you grew up?

I actually wanted to be a teacher when I was 10 or 11, then I realised how hard it was — but there’s still time. Then I wanted to be an archaeologist. I think that had something to do with Indiana Jones

 

Councils ‘not tracking’ 16 to 18s

Skills Minister Matthew Hancock (pictured) has criticised a dozen councils for failing to track 16 to 18-year-olds’ employment status.

Mr Hancock wrote to each of the councils following the publication of Department for Education (DfE) statistics showing the number of 16 to 17-year-olds in each area in work, training or education, along with those who were and were not unaccounted for.

Skills Minister Matthew Hancock

The government has not released data for 18-year-olds, but FE Week understands it is the combined data for 16, 17 and 18-year-olds which caused concern over these councils.

Mr Hancock said: “These new figures show a worrying variation in how well councils track participation in education and training among 16 and 17-year-olds.

“I have written to authorities we have particular concerns about to remind them of their duty to collect this crucial information.”

Councils’ responses included blaming issues with computer systems, or social and geographical challenges specific to their area, while a few acknowledged the problem and said they were working on it.

Several councils said there had been problems in transferring the responsibility for collecting the data from the Connexions service, which was closed by the government in 2012.

A few, including Stoke-on-Trent, questioned the statistics, saying they did not match their own data.

A DfE spokesperson said the figures took the academic age of the young people, counting those who were 16, 17 and 18 on September 1, meaning some 19-year-olds would also be included, which was a different method to that used by Stoke-on-Trent Council.

The responses of the 12 local authorities are below.

1. Birmingham City Council

A spokesperson said: “We are currently in the process of responding to the minister regarding his letter.”

 

2. Borough of Poole Council
Vicky Wales, head of children, young people and learning, said: “The transfer from one provider of service to another [Connexions Services to the council’s Children’s Services] has led to a situation where robust data on individual young people was not consistently available.

“This has presented considerable challenges in the first year of operation including a high level of young people where information on the young person’s education, employment and training situation was not known. We are aware that other local authorities have experienced similar challenges during such a transition.”

Councillor Janet Walton, cabinet portfolio holder for children and families, said: “This situation is one which has been of concern to the council and we have a comprehensive plan to enable us in future years to track the progress of individual young people.”

 

3. Derby City Council

Councillor Martin Rawson, cabinet member for children and young people, said: “We recognise the current figures in relation to young people not in education, employment or training are not what we would hope.

“The council transferred its database which captures these figures earlier this year, and this has resulted in a gap between actual performance and the data which can be submitted.

“We place high importance on tracking the outcomes for young people and we continue to work hard to ensure our data reflects this.”

 

4. Derbyshire County Council

Councillor Damien Greenhalgh, deputy cabinet member for children and young people, said: “There were some initial teething problems with the upgrades to the system which meant we were not able to track what was happening with complete accuracy for a short period of time. However we are confident now that the system failures have been rectified.”

He added: “We are confident the latest figures due to be published in the next few weeks will be a true reflection of what our young people are doing in Derbyshire.”

 

5. Gloucestershire County Council

Stewart King, lead commissioner for education and skills, said: “We are confused by the letter from the Minister for Skills. The Department has published statistics on participation of 16 and 17-year-olds in education and training. They show an improving picture for Gloucestershire with participation rising sharply over the past year and the proportion of young people whose position is ‘not known’ falling to 3.5 per cent, well below the national average of 4 per cent.

“We have been working closely with schools, colleges and providers to track young people and have made great progress in the past six months to improve data sharing and record what young people are doing. Data for 18 year olds has yet to be published.”

 

6. Herefordshire Council

Jo Davidson, director of children’s wellbeing, said: “We are concerned about the number of young people who are not participating in education, employment and training post-16 in Herefordshire. We are also concerned about the number of those who we don’t know about.

“The council has taken action to address these concerns. Following advice and support from other local authorities, a task group set up earlier this year has worked with local providers of education, employment and training to improve procedures and processes.

“The process of gathering data is now robustly performance-managed and we aim to be among the top local authority performers by this time next year.”

 

7. Lincolnshire County Council

Councillor Patricia Bradwell, executive councillor for children’s services, said it had been required to track just ‘vulnerable’ 16 to 18–year-olds following the demise of the Connexions advice service — but more recently the government said local authorities had to “engage with all young people not engaged in learning or employment”.

“So for a period of one year contact was lost with some 16 to 18-year-olds who did not fall into the category of ‘vulnerable’. Like other authorities we are trying to catch up on this lost data, but trends clearly show we are making great strides,” she said.

“What’s confusing about the letter we received is that the authorities listed seem to be those who have seen an increase in unknowns among this age group over the last year which would of course cause concern. Yet in Lincolnshire, we are definitely turning the corner and significantly reducing the unknowns.”

 

8. Shropshire Council

Councillor Ann Hartley, cabinet member for children’s services — transformation and safeguarding, said: “In June, the percentage of 16 and 17-year-olds who would be classed as ‘unknown’ in participation terms stood at 5.1 per cent in Shropshire. This is where we have focused our resources in order that those young people who are classified as Neet have the support to engage with education or training. It is increasingly challenging to track the 18 and 19-year-olds, which do constitute a high proportion of the not known figures overall, as they are a more transient group.”

 

9. South Gloucestershire Council

A council spokesperson said: “For many years South Gloucestershire has had high rates of participation in education, employment and training (EET) by young people.

“The duty to follow up these young people to ascertain their EET status and to provide support transferred from an external provider back to South Gloucestershire Council in April 2013.

“We have experienced a number of issues as a result of the transition of both staff and data and the setting up of new management information systems. These have now been resolved and we expect future reports to be a more accurate indication of how young people are doing in South Gloucestershire. This issue remains a high priority for the council.”

 

10. Stoke-on-Trent City Council

Dave Perrett, assistant director of Learning Services, said: “Unfortunately, there are errors in the letter which attribute the wrong figures for Stoke-on-Trent to 16 to 18-year-olds. We are performing well when it comes to properly tracking this age group, beating both the national and West Midlands averages with an encouraging figure of only 3.2 per cent unaccounted for.”

 

11. Tower Hamlets Council

A council spokesperson said: “The minister’s measures do not take into account the unique challenges faced by inner-city boroughs when comparing local authorities nationally.

Tower Hamlets has one of the most dynamic communities in the country with high levels of private rented accommodation and resident churn. These present unique challenges for tracking young people not shared by other boroughs across the country.”

 

12. Waltham Forest Council

Unavailable for comment

 

 

Escaping the prison education past

Prisons came under fire in a speech by Ofsted’s FE and skills director Matthew Coffey, who pointed out how not one of the 78 prisons inspected since 2009 had been graded as outstanding. His criticisms held little, if anything, for Dr Paul Philips to disagree with.

My own college won a contract to deliver offender learning just last year and this coincided with the change from Offender Learning and Skills Service (Olass) 3 methodology to Olass 4.

The changes were dramatic and moved teaching and learning onto a level playing field with FE.

Simultaneously, the whole issue of ‘through the gate’ activity was examined to ensure that offenders were able and ready for work when they completed their sentences, with appropriate qualifications and a real chance of entering the work force.

But the challenges are great because success is dependent on a significant number of parameters.

If I start with the teaching and learning angle then it is imperative that learners are stretched and challenged, and work to develop skills in our staff is well underway.

In quite a few cases we have inherited brilliant, dynamic individuals who have a real focus on developing learners to achieve their potential.

In others, it is like stepping back to the FE world of the 1980s, so there is plenty of work to be done.

Teaching and learning is the focus, but for it to happen all the other parts of the jigsaw need to be in place.

It is essential that prisoners are released from their cells to attend on time, it is imperative that the prison governor and his or her team are equally enthused about offender learning and, simultaneously, we must ensure that we have the resources to develop state-of-the-art learning.

For obvious reasons technology is not always at the forefront of prison resources.

The biggest issue from my perspective is that of supporting prisoners in learning. One should not underestimate the level of additional support that prisons need to succeed.

Sadly, many of them have not had anywhere near the opportunities in life that we have been privileged to receive.

There is a need to invest in this particular area of work if we are to reap the benefits.

In the first year of our contract we were allocated around 5 per cent of our overall budget for additional support, some £600,000 — we used £1.2m just to stand still.

Now, in the second year of our contract we are not allowed to use more of this type of money than the previous year.

Our experience is that only 20 per cent of offenders disclose that they have a learning difficulty and furthermore there is no money to develop strategies to employ and train staff with specialist skills, strategies and technologies that are needed to address the challenges of these complex learners once they are in main education.

I am passionate about offender learning and regularly challenge the Skills Funding Agency [SFA] and others on providing resources to make this area of provision outstanding.

We are nevertheless sadly dealing with a large hidden disability in mental health across these learners which does impact upon concentration span and communication.

I find it astonishing that this issue is well-researched and known about within the prison estate, but is largely ignored through educational reform.

Key data indicates that more than 70 per cent of prisoners have mental health problems (Inspector of Prisons for Scotland, 2006).

So in response to Mr Coffey’s comments, I cannot actually disagree — we do need more accountability by prison establishments, we do need more attention to maths and English and we do need to rapidly improve teaching and learning.

Equally I already have some prisons who are exemplary in every respect and are good, journeying to outstanding. In others, the task will be bigger.

Putting it into context, Ofsted needs to influence government to invest in this key area of work and recognise the learning support needs.

Let us hope Ofsted, the SFA, the prison regime and FE work together with central government to respond robustly. We are not complacent, we do need investment.

Dr Paul Philips OBE, principal, Weston College, North Somerset

Yorkshire provider loses £500k funding over audit ‘concerns’

A West Yorkshire training provider is to have its £500,000 Skills Funding Agency contract terminated after an audit raised concern about learner records and financial dealings.

The agency confirmed to FE Week that its agreement with iCOCO Training, based in Cleckheaton, would end in early December.

However, an agency spokesperson said it was “not conducting any investigation into any matters relating to iCOCO Training”.

She said: “The decision was made following concerns about the quality of learners’ records and financial claims submitted to the agency by iCOCO that came to light during a recent audit.

“The provider was formally notified on September 10 and accordingly the contract will terminate on December 9.”

The provider offers training courses for hairdressing, customer services, business administration, child care and beauty therapy.

The agency said either party could terminate the contract with three months’ notice, without the need to give a reason.

“All learners have now been transferred to either Kirklees College or Calderdale College in order to complete their learning,” said its spokesperson.

Allisonne Reilly, managing director of iCOCO, declined to comment.

Colleges under fire in social mobility commission report

A hard-hitting report by the government’s social mobility commission has attacked college performance and recommended funding for employment outcomes rather than recruitment.

The Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission’s 348-page document concluded: “Current policies are likely to be insufficient to address entrenched and unacceptably high levels of youth unemployment and inactivity.”

It had used damning Ofsted statistics to paint a bleak picture of colleges while calling for a wide range of changes.

Among its ten recommendations was that “colleges in the future be paid by the results they achieve for their students in the labour market and not the numbers they recruit”.

It received short shrift from Malcolm Trobe, deputy general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders.

He said: “There are number of factors that influence how well students fare in the labour market, the obvious ones being the local economy and the career they aspire to.

“While colleges do all they can to prepare students for the world of work, they cannot be held responsible for finding jobs for them and it is unreasonable to suggest that this be used to hold them to account.”

It further suggested a “participation payment” for young people doing traineeships.

It said: “The government should consider introducing a youth credit (or participation payment), conditional on their participation in high quality work-related support and educational programmes, perhaps along the lines of current traineeships (with funding drawn out of the Bursary Fund and Child Benefit for 16 and 17-years-olds and out of Jobseeker’s Allowance for the over-18s).”

And on funding, it said: “Reforms to vocational qualifications look positive, though there remains inadequate information on courses and apprenticeships, and too little support for non-academic routes. There is also excessive complexity in local funding.”

Meanwhile, the commission, chaired by former Labour Health Secretary Alan Milburn, used Ofsted inspections to further criticise the sector.

“Ofsted inspection data lays bare the challenges for the sector, including the fact that at the end of August 2012, 1.5 million learners in the post-16 learning and skills sector were in provision that was rated less than good,” said the report, published on Thursday.

It added: “There is a need to have a far greater focus on improving the quality of further education provision, which is the largest provider of education to those who do not do well at school.”

Lynne Sedgmore, executive director of the 157 Group, hit back at the report’s findings.

She said: “Relying heavily on a snapshot of Ofsted data from more than a year ago does not provide sound enough basis for critiquing the social inclusion that colleges undertake.

“The report is missing the point of the critical work done by colleges that needs to be looked at more closely and comprehensively.

“The rich offering of FE to social mobility has been under-acknowledged in this important report.”

She added: “We support the report’s emphasis on quality as we strive for world class standards while remaining focused on the needs of the learner.

“We have long argued for a more intelligent accountability framework that includes destinations, value added and distance travelled as well as employer and learner feedback.”

The Association of Colleges declined to comment.

———————————————————————–

Editorial: Young deserve better

The social mobility commission’s report should serve as a wake-up call to government, not a bat with which to beat colleges.

The commission is right to point out that, “current policies are likely to be insufficient to address entrenched and unacceptably high levels of youth unemployment and inactivity”.

For example, it is mind-blowing that there is no funding incentive for a traineeship provider to actually progress trainees into work.

It is also shocking that while 16 to 18 apprenticeship funding goes unspent, colleges, as previously reported by FE Week, are turning away potential 16 to 18 trainees in favour of 19 to 23-year-olds because there’s no money left for the younger age group.

And the Skills Funding Agency’s ‘job outcome payment’ for adults is a farce because it can only be paid out to providers when learners either fail their qualifications or walk away early — providing they’ve won employment.

But if your learner passes their qualification and gets a job there’s no such payment.

So there are some simple solutions that the Skills Minister can act on immediately.

Firstly, the ringfence on 16 to 18 apprenticeship funding needs to be loosened to enable colleges to access funding specifically for traineeships.

Secondly, a new single funding system for all 16 to 23-year-old traineeships that incorporates payment by results in 2014/15.

Thirdly, the agency should consult immediately on scrapping its pathetic attempt at a job outcome payment. The sector needs a funding system that fully incentivises positive adult progression.

None of this is particularly difficult and, frankly, it’s too important for all our futures to ignore.

Nick Linford, editor

Commons grilling for Elmfield, Syddall and SFA

Former Elmfield director Ged Syddall and Skills Funding Agency finance director Paul McGuire look set for a “no-holds-barred” grilling by MPs over allegations of apprenticeship malpractice.

It is understood they will be called before the House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Select Committee by the end of next month in light of an investigation into Elmfield by BBC’s Newsnight.

A senior current member of Elmfield staff is also expected to be summoned with Mr Syddall having quit as the firm’s director amid the BBC probe — although it is understood he remains majority shareholder.

The Newsnight report, supported with information uncovered by FE Week, aired on Friday, October 4, and focussed on Elmfield’s dealings with workers at supermarket giant Morrisons.

It was alleged Elmfield received agency money for apprenticeships that employees had declined. Elmfield told Newsnight that investigations had been carried out, uncovering “no evidence of malpractice,” although a further investigation had since been launched.

Committee chair Adrian Bailey told FE Week: “I am putting it to the committee that we invite Mr Sydall, Mr McGuire and a senior member of Elmfield staff to discuss allegations made and the contractual arrangements between Elmfield, Morrisons and the agency.

“I want to find out the extent of Mr Sydall’s current involvement, including details of the proportion of shares he owns in the company.

“Our questioning would be wide-ranging, no-holds-barred and include how much money he’s made from the business and its public funds.”

It would be the second time Mr Syddall has appeared before Mr Bailey’s committee. He gave evidence in April last year, when he said Elmfield’s entire income of £30m in 2011/12 came from public funds. He also defended his own £3m company dividend.

Meanwhile, Ofsted — whose inadequate grading of Elmfield in July prompted an agency notice of serious breach and a ban on new learners, along with Mr Syddall’s resignation as chief executive — carried out a two-day monitoring visit last month. It was carried out at least three months early, at the request of Skills Minister Matthew Hancock, and the resulting report, published this month, told of “reasonable” and also “significant” progress in key areas.

An Elmfield spokesperson said: “We are pleased to see that we have been able to demonstrate progress in all areas of our work examined by Ofsted in a very short space of time.”

The monitoring report, which unlike full inspection reports gives no overall grade, saw the agency lift its blanket ban on new Elmfield apprentices. But the notice of serious breach remains in place.

A spokesperson for the agency, which is still investigating apprenticeship malpractice claims against Elmfield, said: “We will assess any request from Elmfield to start new apprenticeships on a case by case basis.”

Morrisons stopped contracting with Elmfield in August, when NCG (formerly Newcastle College Group) took over the apprenticeship training contract. Neither Morrisons nor NCG are accused of any wrongdoing.

Niace demands Pupil Premium cash for family learning

The National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (Niace) wants Pupil Premium cash from the government to fund a huge expansion in family learning across the country.

It unveiled a report today, called Family Learning Works, outlining how family education programmes improved child and adult numeracy, literacy and other key skills.

Family programmes aim to encourage family members to learn together, providing learning to both adults and children and provide progression for the adult to other learning.

They are usually delivered by teachers from FE colleges, local authorities, or charities at primary schools.

And David Hughes, Niace chief executive, has called on the government to encourage schools to spend their Pupil Premiums on family learning.

The national Pupil Premium budget was £1.875bn in 2013-14, with schools — who have freedom to spend the funding how they want — attracting £900 per disadvantaged child.

Niace would like at least 2.3 per cent of this money diverted to family learning, which would amount to £45m in England.

Mr Hughes said: “Across the country, there are examples of family learning programmes which have transformed the prospects for adults and children. But these programmes need to be the norm in every school and community.

“There is funding available to pay for this through the Pupil Premium. Family learning must be part of a national strategy, formed of local partnerships, to give adults and children from all walks of life the opportunities to become learners and reap the wide benefits of learning.”

The government launched the Pupil Premium scheme in April 2011 to help reduce inequalities between children eligible for free school meals and their peers.

Lady Howarth chaired the Niace inquiry that produced the report. She said: “Evidence shows family learning could increase the overall level of children’s development by as much as 15 per cent for those from disadvantaged groups.

“It could, in one generation, change the lives of a whole generation. We would be foolish to miss such an opportunity.”

The report called for family learning to become a key element of future government planning for improving post-16 education and adult employment prospects.

It stated: “We want family learning to be seen as an effective use of school funding, to ensure the parents and carers of children, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, are offered high-quality learning opportunities.

“In addition, we want to see family learning integrated into strategies to engage those furthest from the labour market and improve employability where, evidence shows, learning can be hugely effective — perhaps more so than any other single intervention.”

Nine in court over alleged A4e fraud

Nine former employees of welfare to work provider A4e have appeared in court charged with fraud.

The six women and three men face more than 50 counts between them, including forgery, possessing an article for use in fraud and conspiracy to defraud.

Among the accused is a former contract manager, a former administrator and seven former recruiters who were employed across three A4E offices in South East England.

It is alleged that they forged documentation to support fraudulent claims to the Department for Work and Pensions for reward payments, under the Aspire to Inspire programme, which ended in July 2011. The allegations date from February 2009 and follow an investigation by the Thames Valley Police Economic Crime Unit.

A Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson said: “Under the terms of the contract, payments were made when the scheme successfully placed individuals in employment.

“It is alleged that many of the reward payments related either to people who never attended A4E or to clients whom A4E had not successfully placed in employment. The contract was to deliver motivation and training and to assist people to find employment.”

The nine defendants appeared at Slough Magistrates’ Court on Monday, October 14, where they spoke only to confirm their details. No pleas were entered.

District Judge Tan Ikram granted them each unconditional bail to appear at Reading Crown Court on Monday, October 28.

An A4e spokesperson said: “The investigation by Thames Valley Police relates to alleged incidents which date back to 2009 and were uncovered by A4e’s own internal controls.

“We referred the matter to the DWP, which then referred the allegations to the police.

“The alleged incidents all relate to old paper-based contracts which used systems that have since been replaced.

“We are fully co-operating with the police to ensure the investigation can be concluded quickly and are therefore unable to comment further on an ongoing enquiry.”

Ines Cano-Uribe, contract manager, aged 37, of Madrid, Spain, was charged with one count of forgery and one count of conspiracy to defraud

Zabar Khalil, administrator, 34, of Dolphin Road, Slough, was charged with five counts of forgery and one count of conspiracy to defraud.

Charles McDonald, recruiter, 43, of Derwent Road, Egham, was charged with seven counts of forgery, one count of possessing an article for use in fraud and two counts of making articles for use in fraud.

Nikki Foster, recruiter, 30, of High Tree Drive, Reading, was charged with 10 counts of forgery.

Julie Grimes, recruiter, 50, of Monks Way, Staines, was charged with 10 counts of forgery.

Aditi Singh, recruiter, 30, of Elmshott Lane, Slough, was charged with three counts of forgery and one count of possession of an article for use in fraud.

Bindiya Dholiwar, recruiter, 27, of Reddington Drive, Slough, was charged with seven counts of forgery.

Dean Lloyd, recruiter, 36, of Rochfords, Coffee Hall, Milton Keynes, was charged with 13 counts of forgery.

Yasmin Ahmad, recruiter, 38, of Colchester Road, Southend-on-Sea, was charged with two counts of forgery.

[Proceeding]

Minister in Elite tag ‘hint’ after Premier Colleges launch

A “new breed of elite colleges” appears to have been hinted at in the same week as a group of providers have branded themselves Premier Colleges.

Skills Minister Matthew Hancock mentioned the word “elite” four times in a recent speech about the future of colleges.

And it is understood Mr Hancock is considering official use of the term ‘elite college’ for the best performing, which could require a particular specialism or a high level of employer engagement.

However, a spokesperson at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills declined to comment on whether there were plans for such a new college brand.

But Mr Hancock’s comments have sparked concerns about FE appearing to become an elitist sector, with 157 Group executive director Lynne Sedgmore saying she was “very cautious” about the term.

Nevertheless, Mr Hancock’s reference to “elite colleges” came during a speech to the Edge Foundation on Tuesday, where he explained his vision for the future of FE.

In his speech, Mr Hancock said: “I want to see the emergence of a new breed of elite colleges, which lead the nation — indeed lead the world — in their area. I want to talk to you today about what reform looks like.

“About what we’ve done so far and what we’re changing. And in particular, the role colleges can play — including as elite institutions, leaders in their communities.”

Lynne Sedgmore, executive director of the 157 Group, said: “FE colleges are absolutely dedicated to maintaining the highest possible standards.

“But I’m very cautious about using the word elite — with all its connotations about exclusiveness — in a sector that is fundamentally based on social mobility, social inclusion and creating opportunities for all.”

The minister’s comments came as Skills Show sponsors grouped together to brand themselves Premier Colleges.

A Skills Show spokesperson told FE Week: “A select group of 20 of the UK’s leading and highly responsive colleges and a university, with vocational education and training at the heart of their businesses, have joined forces to form a new working association called Premier Colleges”.

The Skills Show’s new premier sponsor, include:

  • Bedford College
  • Birmingham Metropolitan College
  • Bournville College
  • Burton & South Derbyshire College
  • Central Campus – Sandwell College
  • City of Wolverhampton College
  • Derby College
  • Dudley College
  • North Warwickshire & Hinckley College
  • Oxford & Cherwell Valley College
  • Peterborough Regional College
  • Solihull College
  • South and City College Birmingham
  • South Leicestershire College
  • South Staffordshire College
  • Stephenson College
  • Stoke on Trent College
  • University College Birmingham
  • Walsall College
  • Warwickshire College

All but three of the sponsors are from the Midlands.

The spokesperson added: “The colleges involved in the Premier Colleges group have not been selected — they have voluntarily invested in the [Skills] show as a public demonstration of what they contribute to FE and their commitment to the promotion of the sector,” she said.

She added: “All colleges in the group collectively cover a wide geographical area — beyond the Midlands — and all have supporting The Skills Show as a key motivation, among others that are largely specific to their individual colleges.”

The national Skills Show is being held at the NEC Birmingham on November 14 to 16.