SFA publishes new way to measure performance for 2013/14, just days after providers submit final data

New minimum standards guidance for post-19 training was published today, revealing a shake-up in how the Skills Funding Agency measures qualification success rates (QSRs).

It comes just days after providers submitted their ILR 14 returns amid reports of ongoing problems with the Hub, which is due to fully replace the online data collection (OLDC) next month.

Providers’ QSR performances will be based on data submitted in ILR 14 and, as reported by FE Week, the hub broke down at a critical time at least twice since it started being used in July. The SFA previously acknowledged problems in August for R12 returns and in September, when the hub broke down on the deadline day for R13.

Nevertheless, previously, providers’ QSRs were divided up into three categories — long, for courses of 24 weeks or more, short, for courses lasting two weeks to 24 weeks, and very short, those less than two weeks.

Today, the government guidance said the categories had been “simplified” — into 13 qualification types, including apprenticeship frameworks (which continue to have a 55 per cent success rate threshold), A-level (which continues at 75 per cent), AS-level (which continues at 63 per cent), awards, certificates, diplomas, English for speakers of other languages, Functional Skills and GCSE maths and English.

There will also be categories for other GCSEs, other non-regulated qualifications, other regulated qualifications and QCF units.

Providers face the SFA’s intervention process, including a visit from the FE commissioner for colleges, if they fail to reach the QSR thresholds.

The QSR document out today also revealed that the SFA was ready to look at including other data within its minimum standards that has already been the subject of a consultation.

“It is our intention to explore how we can include other measures within Minimum Standards from 2014 to 2015 following the recent consultation on Outcome Based Success Measures,” it said.

“This will take a wider view of success and recognise whether individuals make progress into further learning or into / within work.”

It added: “We expect colleges, training organisations and employers to review their results and proactively identify and address under performance and/or areas for improvement.”

 

Source: http://bit.ly/1tBTAa1

 

Webinar advert

EFA funding rate to be revealed in January, director confirms

The 2015/16 funding rate for 16 to 18-year-olds will not be announced until January, an Education Funding Agency (EFA) director has confirmed.

Last year providers were warned in December that the EFA funding rate for 18-year-olds would be cut by 17.5 per cent, but they weren’t told what the top line figure for 16 and 17-year-olds would be until March, when it was announced it would remain at £4,000 per learner.

Providers have now been told they will have to wait until January to learn how much they will get for each student for 2015/16.

In a letter to providers, the EFA’s director for young people Peter Mucklow (pictured) said: “There will be no additional changes to the funding factors within the national funding formula for 2015/16. We hope to provide stability in funding rates for 2015/16.

“We plan to confirm the national funding rate in January 2015, informed by final data on academic year 2013 to 2014 (2013/14) student numbers and early data on 2014 to 2015 academic year (2014/15) student numbers.

“However, we can confirm now that the funding rates for disadvantaged students without GCSE Grade C or above in English or mathematics are unchanged at £480 per subject for full time students and the equivalent reduced rates for part time students.

“In 2014/15 we implemented a reduction in funding for 18-year olds (other than those with high needs) on full time programmes and provided some short-term protection for the change in that year.

“The reduction in funding for 18-year-olds will continue to apply in 2015/16 and there will be no further transitional protection applied.

“Transitional protection from the Spending Review 2010 decisions to equalise school sixth form funding with other institutions and to reduce funding for enrichment also comes to an end in 2014/15 and so will not apply in 2015/16.”

The letter asked providers to take the letter, along with their own “financial health” into account when planning for 2015/16, and added that notification of allocations would come in February in most cases.

It says: “In planning their offer to young people for 2015/16 institutions will wish to take into account the information in this letter, their financial health and cost pressures, and the wider local environment including the continued demographic downturn across England in numbers of 16-year-olds.

“We recognise the importance of early information on funding to allow institutions to plan effectively. We are planning this year to bring forward the notification of allocations to institutions to February 2015 wherever possible.

“The main exceptions are likely to be commercial and charitable providers (CCPs) and any other FE institutions where allocations are based on R06 data received by EFA in February, where the allocations will be sent out in early March.

“This means that any business cases (excluding high needs) for changes to funding due to exceptional circumstances will be dealt with in March/April 2015 after allocations have been issued.”

Boles makes U-turn on apprenticeship grading

New apprenticeship frameworks will no longer be forced to include pass, merit and distinction gradings, the Skills Minister has revealed.

Skills Minister Nick Boles told FE Week he would be assessing whether apprenticeships should be graded on a “case by case” basis.

The U-turn by the new Minister follows “very strong representations” by the sector, Mr Boles said.

Concerns were first raised when the implementation plan for apprenticeship reform, published under previous Skills Minister Matthew Hancock in October 2013, said all elements of every apprenticeship framework would have to be graded at pass, merit or distinction.

In March 2014 Mr Hancock said only the end result would be graded but Mr Boles has now said there may be some areas where it is “inappropriate” to grade apprentices’ work at all and instead a simple pass or fail should be offered.

Mr Boles spoke to FE Week following publication today of ‘Guidance for developers of apprenticeship standards and related assessment plans’, which stated that the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) had “agreed a compromise position which ensured grading was applied where it could be”.

However, the document stated: “In a small number of cases it may not be possible to grade any aspect of the apprenticeship due to assessments within the apprenticeship being aligned with external organisations or regulations which do not incorporate grading.”

It added BIS would consider requests not to grade an apprenticeship where assessments were aligned with professional registration, regulation or a licence to practise, but would only make exemptions for specific standards, not for an entire sector or industry.

Standard developers wishing to request an exemption form grading should contact their relationship manager, it said.

The document also suggested that a merit grade may not be required.

“A pass grade in any apprenticeship must demonstrate full competency against the standard you have set and there will need to be at least one grade above pass to recognise exceptional performance.”

Mr Boles said: “It’s still very much a strong preference that as many can be graded are graded.”

But he said, in cases involving “very strongly regulated activities” or “particular safety aspects”, he would be willing to make an exception.

He said: “There have been very strong representations that grading is inappropriate – because bluntly does anyone want to know that somebody responsible for their safety in an aeroplane was a good and somebody else was a distinction?”

He added: “You want to know that everybody has met all of the standards fully.”

FE Week understands that some frameworks connected to the maritime industry are among the first to be allowed go without grading.

“We’ve made the odd exception and we’ll make the odd one where the arguments are good enough,” Mr Boles said.

“Case by case, we’re willing to take arguments but the broad thrust is that where at all possible we want graded because we want the qualifications to be like other qualifications, which are graded.”

Picture: Nick Boles with BSkyB interns Kiran Hussain, aged 18 and Priscilla Ossai, 21, in the Sky Sports studios, where he spoke to FE Week

More than 700 employers to set standards for 76 apprenticeships

More than 700 employers will design 76 new apprenticeships in professions ranging from policing, the Armed Forces and TV production to welding and boat building, the Government has announced.

It will bring the total number of employers involved in designing apprenticeships as part of the Government’s trailblazers scheme to more than 1,000.

A Government spokesperson said the third wave of trailblazers would involve employers from across 37 more sectors designing “new apprenticeships to best meet the skills needs of their industries”.

Business Secretary Vince Cable said: “Across the country apprenticeships are a driving force behind getting young people the skills that employers want and the economy needs.

“Our reforms have empowered businesses large and small to design and deliver world-beating apprenticeships that offer a real route to a successful career.”

Employers including PwC, BAE Systems and Greater Manchester Fire & Rescue will work with organisations from across their industries to develop the new apprenticeships.

Employers involved in the earlier phases of the trailblazers scheme will develop a further 47 apprenticeships.

During a visit to Sky, one of 18 employers working together to design new apprenticeships in television production and broadcasting as part of the new phase of trailblazers, Skills Minister Nick Boles said: “There has never been a better time to do an apprenticeship. Apprenticeships give you the experience and top-quality training you need to get the career you want.

“I’m thrilled to be working with UK companies including Jaguar Land Rover and Grant Thornton to make our apprenticeship system the best it can be.”

Mr Boles also met with software developer apprentice Priscilla Ossai, a prominent figure in the Government’s newly launched Get In. Go Far campaign.

The campaign is working to change the perception of apprenticeships among young people, their parents and teachers by showcasing the variety and quality of apprenticeships on offer today in some of Britain’s biggest and brightest companies.

Graham McWilliam, Sky group director of corporate affairs, said: “At Sky we’re delighted to be supporting the trailblazer programmes. It forms part of our wider commitment to providing apprenticeships across our business — around 150 next year — as well as offering a huge range of other opportunities and training to young people across the UK.”

Steven Read, trainee programmes manager at UK Power Networks which delivers electricity supplies in London and were part of the Energy and Utilities trailblazer under the first phase of the scheme, said: “We are delighted to welcome our first 29 new recruits to the new power distribution craftspeople apprenticeship.

“The trailblazer initiative has allowed employers like us to introduce a common industry standard in the skills we teach to the dedicated men and women who keep Britain’s electricity distribution networks running.

“It is refreshing, as an employer, to be involved in designing and a developing the benchmark against which all our apprentices are trained.”

Trailblazers, which were launched in October last year, allow groups of leading employers within a sector to work together to develop new apprenticeship standards.

The initiative aims to ensure that every apprentice in England is enrolled on a scheme that has been designed and approved by employers.

Lambeth College staff could strike again after rejecting ‘improved’ contract offer

Lambeth College staff who went on a five-week strike earlier this year have rejected “improved” offers over contract changes.

University and College Union (UCU) members walked out indefinitely on June 3 in a dispute over new staff contracts introduced on April 1, which the UCU said would leave staff with longer working hours, less sick pay and less annual leave, before returning to work on July 9.

The UCU confirmed two weeks ago that it had cancelled a ballot for further strike action to allow members to vote on whether they wanted to accept “improved” offers from college bosses.

But a spokesperson said today these had been rejected by 92 per cent of branch members who voted — although it is understood less than 55 per cent of UCU members who work at the college took part in the ballot.

He said: “Members have voted overwhelmingly against the proposals made by management, as is their democratic right. Any sensible employer would be working hard to try and resolve the issue and repair staff relations.

He added: “We will now be seeking approval from the officers for a fresh industrial action ballot.

“In the meantime we hope the college recognises the strength of feeling among staff and agrees to fresh talks aimed at resolving the outstanding issues.”

No date has so far been set for when a ballot for further industrial action could be launched.

The college offered a guarantee that staff taken on before April 1 would have stayed on the original contract until at least September 2017.

Alternatively, existing staff could have accepted a £1,500 “cash incentive” to transfer to the new contract by September 2016.

Both options were dependent on staff agreeing to work an extra hour per week from September — increasing their overall annual working hours from 828 to 864.

After learning that UCU members had rejected both offers, principal Mark Silverman said: “Obviously we are disappointed. The options we proposed were fair, harmonised the two contracts that the UCU branch opposed and provided Lambeth College with a contract that would support the flexible needs of learners and protect the financial viability and long-term sustainability of the college.

“Sadly it’s clear that there is a small minority of staff who seem determined to see the college fail and have little regard for our learners and communities who deserve an outstanding college.

“We have moved from the brink of closure in 2012 to a far stronger position where local people want to come to us to gain qualifications which will help them in their chosen careers.

“The college will focus on supporting our learners and has robust plans in place to do so throughout any industrial action.”

The college was slapped with an Ofsted grade four rating in 2012 but worked its way up to a grade three last year.

Mr Silverman said the new contracts were part of efforts to raise standards at the college.

Colleges losing focus on student success, FE Commissioner warns

Colleges are losing their focus on student success in favour of other activities, FE Commissioner Dr David Collins has warned.

In his third letter to the FE sector, which comes after he visited his 14th college since his interventions began, Dr Collins (pictured) said senior teams were often seen by staff as “invisible”, often in colleges which had been judged inadequate in terms of leadership and management.

Dr Collins has now visited Barnfield College, Bicton College, City of Bristol College, City of Liverpool College, City of Wolverhampton College, K College, LeSoco, Stockport College, Startford-upon-Avon College, Weymouth College, Norton Radstock College, Bournville College, Guildford College and West Cheshire College.

He said senior leadership teams should provide “a sense of common purpose and teamwork that centres on the experience and success of the learner”.

But he added: “Given the multiple demands on time and resources, sifting out what is really important and at the heart of the institution – student success – seems to be lost sometimes in the pursuit of tangential activity at the expense of the core business.”

Dr Collins also said some colleges were failing to check their performance against other institutions and seek better practice.

He said the best college leadership teams were aware of what was happening in the sector and beyond, and a “deep understanding and solid relationship with business”, but that “in many of the colleges I have visited to date, this has been missing”.

He added: “A key characteristic has been that they have been inward-looking rather than outward-facing.”

He also called on colleges to address the balance when it comes to the skills of their senior leadership teams.

He said: “In the best colleges, senior leadership teams have the range of skills, qualifications and experience to ensure the delivery of high-quality provision while being sufficiently self-confident to implement change or ask for help if needed.

“In a number of colleges where an intervention has taken place there have been highly-skilled individuals at senior levels but the balance hasn’t always been right. Financial expertise in particular has often been missing and there has been a reluctance to seek help from elsewhere.”

Skills Minister Nick Boles said: “A great number of colleges have made significant steps in improving the quality of their provision. However, the FE commissioner rightly highlights that there is more work to do.

“I would encourage all colleges who need to improve performance to look to those who have demonstrated strong leadership, a clear outward looking vision and who nurture and celebrate the success of both staff and learners.

“That way we can help make sure the entire sector is delivering to the highest possible standards.”

Professor Alison Wolf given peerage

Vocational education expert and academic Alison Wolf is to join the House of Lords, it has been announced.

Professor Wolf, who authored the ground-breaking 2011 report on vocational education which informed much of current government skills policy, was nominated for a life peerage by Prime Minister David Cameron.

And it has been announced today that Mr Cameron’s recommendation has been accepted by The Queen and that Professor Wolf will join the upper house as a cross-bench Peer, meaning she will sit without party political affiliation.

In a statement issued by King’s College, Professor Wolf said: “I am delighted, and obviously very honoured. I’m looking forward to using it do the things I believe in.”

A spokesperson for 10 Downing Street said: “The Queen has been pleased to confer a peerage of the United Kingdom for Life on Sir Jonathan Evans KCB, Sir Robert Rogers KCB, Professor Alison Wolf CBE and Sir Andrew Green KCMG. All four are expected to sit on the Cross Bench.

“These individuals have been nominated personally by the Prime Minister for their public service.”

Professor Wolf is a professor of public sector management at King’s College London and a key adviser to the government, which has adopted her principle of study programmes for learners aged 16 to 19 among other policies.

After graduating from Oxford with a degree in politics, philosophy and economics in the early 1970s, Professor Wolf moved to America, initially continuing her studies and moonlighting as a journalist.

She ended up working for the National Institute of Education and the US Government, advising on educational matters, before returning to the UK in the mid-1980s.

In the early 1990s, Professor Wolf secured Nuffield Foundation funding for research into the evaluation of GNVQs, which took her back to a policy role and into the media spotlight.

She eventually worked for the Institute of Education before joining King’s College and being invited to advise the government.

Award winning app manages muck raking

An app that up to 100 learners from the Rural Business School at Cornwallbased Duchy College helped develop has won an award at the Soil Association’s annual conference.

The Farm Manure Management Application helps farmers assess the amount and variety of manure needed to grow their crops.

The app, developed by learners from a variety of courses at the Rural Business School, was voted as the most pioneering idea in farming and growing across the UK in 2014.

Dr Stephen Roderick, the app’s project manager at the college, said: “We’ve already received over 500 downloads for an app that we feel can make a real difference for farmers. Technology, like this, can improve the efficiency and overall profitability of farms.

“The app is free to download and use.”

Pic from Left: Chris Hodgeson, of Rothamsted Research, Becky Wilson and Claire Reigate, who presented the app on behalf of the college to the Soil Association’s annual conference

EMPRA_banner-for-web